O'Reilly really got his facts wrong today. While he may be right about NBC, he was off base about Rick Santelli. Santelli never said he was reschooled, Cramer said he was reschooled. If O'reilly wants to trash Santelli, I'm turning off FOX!!! I will be watching the channel Santelli's at!
Fuck you Bill!!! Tom Brokaw is such a better news person than Bill. All Bill does is attack the far left, and never the far right! Fair & Balanced, my ass!!!
Bill O'Reilly is f***ing NUTS!!!! MSNBC and Keith Olbermann rules. The reign of FOX News and ultra-right conservatives is over. It is time for moderate level-headed independence and commonsense to take over. IT IS PAST DUE!
the best cure for liberalism is getting a job and leaving your parents basement.
When you achieve both of the above feel free to criticize me. But while my tax money goes to you, keep quiet and read a book that doesn't have communist in the title.
O'Rielly only seems far right to everyone who has been watching PBS or NBC or any other uber liberal orginization. If you know who O'Rielly is, you would understand that he is CENTER. Just review his ideas and talking points. For a true right person, he is TOO left. I guess when you are lost so far left, anything towards center looks right to you...
If you think Bill O'Reilly is centre you clearly have no idea about politics. He's about as conservative as people come. Pro-guns, pro-life, anti-immigration, anti-atheist. These are all right wing characteristics.
any idiot that looks at bill oreillys ratings and attributes that to him being a great journalist is clearly flawed in intelligence. just becuase mcdonalds sells 1000 hamburgers a day, doesnt mean they are the best food to eat. just because walmart employs millions of people doesnt mean its a great job to have. you mindless idiots on the fox news bangwagon need a better form of logic to use as evidence of fox being "fair and balanced".
O'Rielly claims to report the truth and that he is an advocate for fair treatment among the media and that his ratings are high because he is honest and he does convey the truth of specific circumstances when no other host will. If McDonalds claimed to be the healtiest place to eat and in turn sells 1000 hamburgers a day and Walmart claimed to be the best place to work and therefore it employs millions of people, then your analogy would be accurate. But clearly, they do not claim these things.
As Mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.
All Bill OReilly and Ann Coulter ever do is bitch about the "liberal media". Ironic coming from someone who has a TV show, radio program, and writes books...
I'm curious. Liberal in Europe means balanced, open minded, democratic. It's about being open to a wider community and broadening your understanding to cater for differences as opposed of forcing people to be the same.
However, Liberal in US means coward, hypocrite, weak.
Ship them to the U.S. Im an American, and you are exactly right. Liberal is assumed to mean socialist and secular equals atheist. But ask yourself, what is the opposite of a liberal society...? and what is the opposite of a secular society...?
I imagine the opposite of a liberal society is one that has no tolerance for anybody who is different from the 'norms' dictated from the top. Which sounds a great like Nazi Germany.
While I imagine a non-secular society to be one that has has no tolerance for anybody who is different from the religion dictated from the top. So that sounds like Taliban Afghanistan.
Yo just stop it. I'm sick and tired of Europeans assuming that nutcases like Bill O'Reilly speak for the American people. That's like me saying that Pim Fortuyn spoke for all Dutch people, except 10 times worse.
I'm sorry if my comments offended you. But you'll have to take into the context that six months ago I had spent a month in the US being bombarded from all sides (TV, papers and work colleagues) with the concept that 'Liberal' was an insult.
Since then the rhetoric has died down somewhat. Presumably because somebody must have made a joke out of it. I believe it was Barack Obama who was facing the 'Liberal' taunt; mostly from Fox News and it's affiliates.
O'Reilly is basically the same as Olbermann, just on the right instead of the left. Bill-o loves to just talk to right wingers that parrot his point of view, ditto Olbermann w/ his leftists.
Bill O'Reilly is actually one of the few logical and thoughtful ppl in the media. He always presents evidence along w/ his ideas. Sounds a hell of a lot more logical than some liberal saying over and over again tha George Bush is evil or some other anti-american garbage w/out any facts.
People are allowed to be on the left. If NBC is left, it's no worse than Fox being on the right. O'Reilly attacks more people than anyone, and has the nerve to criticize others for it.
Bill Oreilly is the poorest excuse of a human being that has ever been. What's sad is people watch this idiot! Wake up America. Imus has more class in his little finger than Oreilly has in his whole body!!!!
Anyone who think Joe Scarborough and Tucker Carlson are liberals, needs his/her head examined. O'Reilly calls himself an independent, but he's really a NeoCon suckup. What do O'Reilly and Goldberg have to say about exploding budget deficits? What do they have to say about billions of $ on a war meant to appease the NeoCons? What do they have to say about outsourcing jobs? Jackshit. They're NeoCons pretending to be conservatives. No one with functioning central nervous system is fooled.
Therefore Bill O'Reilly = NEOLiberal. O'Reilly's problem is that he's a phony. Every time he's called on his bullshit, he incorrectly claims that he's an independent. I can tolerate other people's ideas, and I also have the right to say that people who are illogical (like O'Reilly) have some pretty fucked-up ideas. You know, you can disagree with something and still tolerate it.
And besides Ckcorbett, I'm not a liberal. I'm a centrist. You know, those people who DON'T suscribe to idiotic ideologies that suppress dissent and intelligent debate?
O'Reilly and Goldberg are unbelievable. What a pair of douchebags they are. They defend a baseless war (itself a diversion from the REAL War on Terrorism) by saying that the only reason we hear about the troubles in Iraq is somehow because the "Liberal" media chooses to cover it. In other words, ignorance is bliss; that by ignoring facts over in Iraq, it makes the situation better. How do these two jackasses make money?
Bill O'Reilly makes money bc he is actually one of the few logical and thoughtful ppl in the media. He always presents evidence along w/ his ideas. Sounds a hell of a lot more logical than some liberal saying over and over that George Bush is evil and trying to take over the world.
Actually, no he isn't. Nor does he present solid evidence with his ideas. Joe Scarborough on the other hand is logical and thoughtful, as is Lou Dobbs and Pat Buchanan. They've also criticized the president when they've seen him make unwise decisions. And guess what? They're CONSERVATIVES. This notion that criticizing the president makes you a "liberal" is a flawed notion.
Actually, no he isn't. Nor does he present solid evidence with his ideas. Joe Scarborough on the other hand is logical and thoughtful, as is Lou Dobbs and Pat Buchanan, and they present solid evidence with their ideas. They've also criticized the president when they've seen him make unwise decisions. And guess what? They're CONSERVATIVES. This notion that criticizing the president makes you a "liberal" is a flawed notion.
It's always so embarrassing listening to someone try to defend the Republican party. There are three critical elements necessary to remain loyal to this catastrophic mess ignorance, anger and greed. You party and your pundits speak volumes of you social retardation and desperation.
Consider this, using O'Reilly, Hannity, Coulter, Savage, Limbaugh ET AL to bolster your argument! Connect the knuckle draggers. Why don't you just tattoo a big "L" on your forehead?
If the media truly had a liberal bias, the Bush Administration would never have been able to bamboozle the American public into this disastrous misadventure in Iraq. There is a shift taking place now, finally, but that's because the PUBLIC is fed up with Republicans and their conservative lapdogs like O'Reilly. The news media is merely responding to that anger.
MURDOCH must be worried that the republican party is toast for the next six years. No republican majority in the house, senate, and the whitheouse come 2008.
Who the fuck cares if there was or wasnt "ONE CONSERVATIVE" on NBC. They repor tthe fucking news Bill. Fox News has ZERO liberals. BILL O CALLING A NEWS ORGANIZATION BIAS IS THE MOST IRONIC STATEMENT EVER SPOKEN. FUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK.
Actually, they have one full time liberal commentator. And that's Alan Colmes, and he's paired by another partisan conservative anyways (Sean Hannity). As for Fox commentators who are liberal, they have Lauren Ingram and Laura Schwartz; paired with about a million other conservatives. And that's what Bill O'Reilly likes to deem as fair and balanced...
Right, they pair weak and ugly (Literally. See Colmes) Liberals with much smarter Conservatives but not for the purpose of making anything "Fair and Balanced". Just makes the Libs look weak.
wow thats original and intelligent. thats what people like me call a logical fallacy, or for people like you, just plain stupid. do you even know anything about politics or Bush. no you don't. you watched the daily show several
times so you think you know everything about politics. and back to your comment. fyi, msnbc has 2 conservatives, joe scarborough and tucker carlson. and fox has alan colmes, a liberal. and least get your facts straight, asshole.
yes it does. outwitting the likes of you is a hobby of mine, you fallacious moron. i hope you are happy sitting on your mothers couch watching the daily show when stewart announces that giuliani/mccain/romney wins. enjoy the meatloaf that your parents serve you tonight. i hope they don't ask why you're still living with them at 30.
How is Joe Scarbough (sp) a liberal? And aparently O'Reilly thinks being liberal is a bad thing and un-patriotic. Now if he is going to question Tom Brokaws patriotism I will have to fight him. Back to Joe, he is a realistic republican and he doesn't like seing the people that represent what he believes turning the country in the wrong direction. O'Reilly's ratings are down and everybody on MSNBC(Olbermann the most) ratings are going up.
Also, the Today Show is a news show in the sense that it reports the news. Unlike the cable networks, however, they do not analyze it. So the argument that Lauer, Viera, Curry, and Roker are liberals is irrelevant. I mean seriously, Bill, you're arguing that a weatherman is a liberal?
Tony Snow apologized to David Gregory for calling him partisan because he knew what he said was wrong. Gregory had been quoting the Iraq Study Group Report when Snow called him a partisan, which was an outrageous claim and warranted an apology.
Foxs uses the word "Liberal" as if it's a bad thing, you americans always amaze me.
dave19941000 1 year ago
If Fox was on the ball they would hire Santelli!!!!!
itsoktoaskaquestion 2 years ago
O'Reilly really got his facts wrong today. While he may be right about NBC, he was off base about Rick Santelli. Santelli never said he was reschooled, Cramer said he was reschooled. If O'reilly wants to trash Santelli, I'm turning off FOX!!! I will be watching the channel Santelli's at!
itsoktoaskaquestion 2 years ago
Jane Hall is a moron!
MyLifeRules76 2 years ago 2
Oh, come on!
NBC = Fox and Fox = NBC
O'Reilly = Olbermann and Olbermann = O'Reilly
They aren't news channels. They are full of pathetic low-brow shows, for pathetic low-brow simpletons.
RPFS2008 3 years ago
Fuck you Bill!!! Tom Brokaw is such a better news person than Bill. All Bill does is attack the far left, and never the far right! Fair & Balanced, my ass!!!
deshy88umkc 3 years ago
He's grasping at ratings...
Bill's a farthole...
Bolgernow 3 years ago
and he gets them. He is the number one watched primetime news program
broncfan23 3 years ago
Not so in the 25-40 "sweet spot" demographic...
MSNBC gets them now, he used to have em...
Bolgernow 3 years ago
Bill O'Reilly is f***ing NUTS!!!! MSNBC and Keith Olbermann rules. The reign of FOX News and ultra-right conservatives is over. It is time for moderate level-headed independence and commonsense to take over. IT IS PAST DUE!
dij7878 3 years ago
dij, olbermann is shit and you are so stupid to think he is worth anything.
AlanCom1 3 years ago 2
lol. idiot.
marxy2 3 years ago
@marx
the best cure for liberalism is getting a job and leaving your parents basement.
When you achieve both of the above feel free to criticize me. But while my tax money goes to you, keep quiet and read a book that doesn't have communist in the title.
AlanCom1 3 years ago 3
so its ok for fox to cater for far right, neo conservative racism but not for nbc to present the counter arguments to it
darraghbuckley27 3 years ago
O'Rielly only seems far right to everyone who has been watching PBS or NBC or any other uber liberal orginization. If you know who O'Rielly is, you would understand that he is CENTER. Just review his ideas and talking points. For a true right person, he is TOO left. I guess when you are lost so far left, anything towards center looks right to you...
r33accord 3 years ago
If you think Bill O'Reilly is centre you clearly have no idea about politics. He's about as conservative as people come. Pro-guns, pro-life, anti-immigration, anti-atheist. These are all right wing characteristics.
PunkRox1977 3 years ago
LOL @ oreilly being centre ROFL
marxy2 3 years ago
any idiot that looks at bill oreillys ratings and attributes that to him being a great journalist is clearly flawed in intelligence. just becuase mcdonalds sells 1000 hamburgers a day, doesnt mean they are the best food to eat. just because walmart employs millions of people doesnt mean its a great job to have. you mindless idiots on the fox news bangwagon need a better form of logic to use as evidence of fox being "fair and balanced".
GstateBALLER925 3 years ago
O'Rielly claims to report the truth and that he is an advocate for fair treatment among the media and that his ratings are high because he is honest and he does convey the truth of specific circumstances when no other host will. If McDonalds claimed to be the healtiest place to eat and in turn sells 1000 hamburgers a day and Walmart claimed to be the best place to work and therefore it employs millions of people, then your analogy would be accurate. But clearly, they do not claim these things.
r33accord 3 years ago 2
oreilly lets goldberg interrupt him, and then he interrupts jane hall, and doesnt let her get in on the discussion.
BAYYtalibanGOhard 3 years ago
As Mankind becomes more liberal, they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protections of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations of justice and liberality.
George Washington
cammcharg 4 years ago
Did they make the business decision to go left?
Yes...and NO.
yes its a business decision. But they didn't decide...it just happened... Maybe they woke the fuck up!
We have the power to make a difference. Just like the US does in Iraq, but our priorities are not with the Iraqis. At least I don't think so.
YangPile 4 years ago
O'Reilly is CRAZY, he needs strong medication.
Christoffeltje 4 years ago
All Bill OReilly and Ann Coulter ever do is bitch about the "liberal media". Ironic coming from someone who has a TV show, radio program, and writes books...
mongo420420 4 years ago
Actually... given how RIGHT WING Fox is... maybe having a liberal 'left' wing news channel might be a good balance!
ascolti 4 years ago
I'm curious. Liberal in Europe means balanced, open minded, democratic. It's about being open to a wider community and broadening your understanding to cater for differences as opposed of forcing people to be the same.
However, Liberal in US means coward, hypocrite, weak.
Where do we ship the dictionaries?
ascolti 4 years ago
Ship them to the U.S. Im an American, and you are exactly right. Liberal is assumed to mean socialist and secular equals atheist. But ask yourself, what is the opposite of a liberal society...? and what is the opposite of a secular society...?
chrismacy55 4 years ago
OK. I'll take up that challenge.
I imagine the opposite of a liberal society is one that has no tolerance for anybody who is different from the 'norms' dictated from the top. Which sounds a great like Nazi Germany.
While I imagine a non-secular society to be one that has has no tolerance for anybody who is different from the religion dictated from the top. So that sounds like Taliban Afghanistan.
ascolti 4 years ago
Yo just stop it. I'm sick and tired of Europeans assuming that nutcases like Bill O'Reilly speak for the American people. That's like me saying that Pim Fortuyn spoke for all Dutch people, except 10 times worse.
mmace91 4 years ago
I'm sorry if my comments offended you. But you'll have to take into the context that six months ago I had spent a month in the US being bombarded from all sides (TV, papers and work colleagues) with the concept that 'Liberal' was an insult.
Since then the rhetoric has died down somewhat. Presumably because somebody must have made a joke out of it. I believe it was Barack Obama who was facing the 'Liberal' taunt; mostly from Fox News and it's affiliates.
ascolti 4 years ago
BILL IS A JACKASS!!!
HELLFIRE8282 4 years ago
O'Reilly is basically the same as Olbermann, just on the right instead of the left. Bill-o loves to just talk to right wingers that parrot his point of view, ditto Olbermann w/ his leftists.
mowm88 4 years ago
Don't talk about Ann Curry you bastard!
Glennandrews 4 years ago
Isn't being called "liberal" a compliment?
pandaboy1010 4 years ago
There is more "spin" on the factor then in a tornado, O'Smarmy is pathetic!
DAVIDINTEL 4 years ago
Bill O'Reilly is actually one of the few logical and thoughtful ppl in the media. He always presents evidence along w/ his ideas. Sounds a hell of a lot more logical than some liberal saying over and over again tha George Bush is evil or some other anti-american garbage w/out any facts.
jsk032284 4 years ago
People are allowed to be on the left. If NBC is left, it's no worse than Fox being on the right. O'Reilly attacks more people than anyone, and has the nerve to criticize others for it.
rexspe 4 years ago
count the number of times bill interrupts bernie and then contrast that with the number of times he interrupts jane
ghduisehrirui 4 years ago
Jane Hall definitely slammed O'Reilly on multiple points-haha. Fox News complaining about fair news coverage? is this a joke?
LoPardo2002 4 years ago
Bill Oreilly is the poorest excuse of a human being that has ever been. What's sad is people watch this idiot! Wake up America. Imus has more class in his little finger than Oreilly has in his whole body!!!!
poodle55 4 years ago
you sound like a poorer excuse for a human being.
ckcorbett 4 years ago
Anyone who think Joe Scarborough and Tucker Carlson are liberals, needs his/her head examined. O'Reilly calls himself an independent, but he's really a NeoCon suckup. What do O'Reilly and Goldberg have to say about exploding budget deficits? What do they have to say about billions of $ on a war meant to appease the NeoCons? What do they have to say about outsourcing jobs? Jackshit. They're NeoCons pretending to be conservatives. No one with functioning central nervous system is fooled.
Ericster2006 5 years ago
You sound like a NEOLiberal, who cant seem to tolerate any idea that is not in line with yours.
ckcorbett 4 years ago
Therefore Bill O'Reilly = NEOLiberal. O'Reilly's problem is that he's a phony. Every time he's called on his bullshit, he incorrectly claims that he's an independent. I can tolerate other people's ideas, and I also have the right to say that people who are illogical (like O'Reilly) have some pretty fucked-up ideas. You know, you can disagree with something and still tolerate it.
Ericster2006 4 years ago
And besides Ckcorbett, I'm not a liberal. I'm a centrist. You know, those people who DON'T suscribe to idiotic ideologies that suppress dissent and intelligent debate?
Ericster2006 4 years ago
Nicely stated each time Ericster2006
asraiSOA 4 years ago
Thanks asraiSOA.
Ericster2006 4 years ago
O'Reilly and Goldberg are unbelievable. What a pair of douchebags they are. They defend a baseless war (itself a diversion from the REAL War on Terrorism) by saying that the only reason we hear about the troubles in Iraq is somehow because the "Liberal" media chooses to cover it. In other words, ignorance is bliss; that by ignoring facts over in Iraq, it makes the situation better. How do these two jackasses make money?
Ericster2006 5 years ago
Bill O'Reilly makes money bc he is actually one of the few logical and thoughtful ppl in the media. He always presents evidence along w/ his ideas. Sounds a hell of a lot more logical than some liberal saying over and over that George Bush is evil and trying to take over the world.
jsk032284 4 years ago
Actually, no he isn't. Nor does he present solid evidence with his ideas. Joe Scarborough on the other hand is logical and thoughtful, as is Lou Dobbs and Pat Buchanan. They've also criticized the president when they've seen him make unwise decisions. And guess what? They're CONSERVATIVES. This notion that criticizing the president makes you a "liberal" is a flawed notion.
Ericster2006 4 years ago
Actually, no he isn't. Nor does he present solid evidence with his ideas. Joe Scarborough on the other hand is logical and thoughtful, as is Lou Dobbs and Pat Buchanan, and they present solid evidence with their ideas. They've also criticized the president when they've seen him make unwise decisions. And guess what? They're CONSERVATIVES. This notion that criticizing the president makes you a "liberal" is a flawed notion.
Ericster2006 4 years ago
It's always so embarrassing listening to someone try to defend the Republican party. There are three critical elements necessary to remain loyal to this catastrophic mess ignorance, anger and greed. You party and your pundits speak volumes of you social retardation and desperation.
ReverbBrownie 5 years ago
Consider this, using O'Reilly, Hannity, Coulter, Savage, Limbaugh ET AL to bolster your argument! Connect the knuckle draggers. Why don't you just tattoo a big "L" on your forehead?
ReverbBrownie 5 years ago
If the media truly had a liberal bias, the Bush Administration would never have been able to bamboozle the American public into this disastrous misadventure in Iraq. There is a shift taking place now, finally, but that's because the PUBLIC is fed up with Republicans and their conservative lapdogs like O'Reilly. The news media is merely responding to that anger.
Smosher 5 years ago
Kiss my ass, Bill O'Reilly.
Tom Brokaw has more integrity in his left nut than your entire family tree.
RockyTop85 5 years ago
MURDOCH must be worried that the republican party is toast for the next six years. No republican majority in the house, senate, and the whitheouse come 2008.
Djneedle83 5 years ago
You did not present any evidence. Explain.
leeemo 5 years ago
Who the fuck cares if there was or wasnt "ONE CONSERVATIVE" on NBC. They repor tthe fucking news Bill. Fox News has ZERO liberals. BILL O CALLING A NEWS ORGANIZATION BIAS IS THE MOST IRONIC STATEMENT EVER SPOKEN. FUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK.
pwsparrow 5 years ago
Actually, they have one full time liberal commentator. And that's Alan Colmes, and he's paired by another partisan conservative anyways (Sean Hannity). As for Fox commentators who are liberal, they have Lauren Ingram and Laura Schwartz; paired with about a million other conservatives. And that's what Bill O'Reilly likes to deem as fair and balanced...
leeemo 5 years ago
Right, they pair weak and ugly (Literally. See Colmes) Liberals with much smarter Conservatives but not for the purpose of making anything "Fair and Balanced". Just makes the Libs look weak.
pwsparrow 5 years ago
wow thats original and intelligent. thats what people like me call a logical fallacy, or for people like you, just plain stupid. do you even know anything about politics or Bush. no you don't. you watched the daily show several
times so you think you know everything about politics. and back to your comment. fyi, msnbc has 2 conservatives, joe scarborough and tucker carlson. and fox has alan colmes, a liberal. and least get your facts straight, asshole.
offhawaii 5 years ago
Someone's lips must have unpuckered off the conservative power teat.
pwsparrow 5 years ago
wow 'unpuckered" is that the biggest word in your vocabulary?
offhawaii 5 years ago
Does somehow thinking you won an online argument make you more emotionally secure?
pwsparrow 5 years ago
yes it does. outwitting the likes of you is a hobby of mine, you fallacious moron. i hope you are happy sitting on your mothers couch watching the daily show when stewart announces that giuliani/mccain/romney wins. enjoy the meatloaf that your parents serve you tonight. i hope they don't ask why you're still living with them at 30.
offhawaii 5 years ago
I see what you did there.
pwsparrow 5 years ago
actually, i'm in high school so living with my parents is not a negative thing for me [sic]
offhawaii 5 years ago
Bill has the either your with me (FOX) or you are a liberal mentality.
cbrock7 5 years ago
How is Joe Scarbough (sp) a liberal? And aparently O'Reilly thinks being liberal is a bad thing and un-patriotic. Now if he is going to question Tom Brokaws patriotism I will have to fight him. Back to Joe, he is a realistic republican and he doesn't like seing the people that represent what he believes turning the country in the wrong direction. O'Reilly's ratings are down and everybody on MSNBC(Olbermann the most) ratings are going up.
logan31188 5 years ago
Also, the Today Show is a news show in the sense that it reports the news. Unlike the cable networks, however, they do not analyze it. So the argument that Lauer, Viera, Curry, and Roker are liberals is irrelevant. I mean seriously, Bill, you're arguing that a weatherman is a liberal?
golga333 5 years ago
Tony Snow apologized to David Gregory for calling him partisan because he knew what he said was wrong. Gregory had been quoting the Iraq Study Group Report when Snow called him a partisan, which was an outrageous claim and warranted an apology.
golga333 5 years ago