Inside Natures Giants Episode 4 The Giraffe Part 1/5 HQ

[HumanCompound]

Please, dont mention evolution :D aint got a silnge proofs for that!

[TheLoserKingdom]

@HumanCompound The evidence is overwhelming. What is your idea of evolution?

[DrOprahVonPenishat]

Sadly it died recently at a British wildlife park.... when we shot it in the head.

[R0B0stairs]

looks like a giant deer at 7:00 anyone care to enlighten me?

[RicksterMedina]

3:46 anal rape

[MyWebsite2006]

Evolution is a myth.

[SwordPlay2]

@MyWebsite2006 Your simple statement shows your ignorance. You reject evolution not because you've poured over the evidence and concluded that its false, you reject it because it (most likely) it interferes with your worldview/religous/ spiritual beliefs. Because of this, you clasp you hands over your ears and ignore the truth so you can continue to live in your lovely bubble of ignorance. an important fallacy, just because you don't understand something, it doesn't mean its bullshit.

[geostigmaX9]

@MyWebsite2006 yea all this proof doesnt seem to ad up, and im a biologists

[magmablood2]

@MyWebsite2006 I agree with you, I do think that we suddenly appeared and were made by a magical fairy man in the sky......nah just kidding, your statement is bullshit. Quit worshiping a magical man who was created by people in a time where humans believed in magic. 

[Nymphelyn]

"Inside Nature's Giants - S1..."

This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement from claimants including:

National Geographic Channel

National Geographic Channel

Discovery Communications

[littleperrie1234]

i subscribed keep these vids comin

[Katazka]

It almost seems like Old Dick here has some sort of problem with God. Oh wait, it's cause he's a cunt. My bad.

[NoWarningable]

@Katazka how can he have a problem with something that doesn't exist. Oh wait my bad, Ive been feuding with the Easter bunny for years now.

[Katazka]

@NoWarningable And yet, he still does.

[NoWarningable]

@Katazka He doesn't have a problem with God, he has a problem with people who deny genuine and obvious evidence of Darwinian Evolution. He explains some fantastic and very difficult to dispute evidence that there was no great engineer of life.

[TheSpankymonkey]

@NoWarningable - Don't feel alone, i have been hating on that bunny for decades now. Floppy eared cunt.

[ladgefull]

They're basically hacking up animals and saying there is no God.

I hope the fucking Police have got an eye on them?

[ExtremeBogom]

@ladgefull

You have to realise that it's because of surgery, that we know how our body works, how people have died, and ultimately trained surgeons to operate on cancers and other disease etc etc.

If you were to stop this, or if surgery would have been banned from day 1, we would have been much less aware of how the body works.

[ladgefull]

@ExtremeBogom

Barry Shitpeas And Co , 04.58.

[gamesisfunny]

@ladgefull dude :) they are doing it for medical purposes. to learn about evolution and how animal bodys works. i think it's very interresting. they don't kill it. they take the oppertunity to learn about it when it died. this is a tv show you know. they have full rights of this and it's not a crime.

[ladgefull]

@gamesisfunny

Barry Shitpeas and Co - 04.59 - 05.42

[gamesisfunny]

@ladgefull yeah what? they are teaching us animal anatomy i think it's intereseting and awesome. i learn so much by watching this what am i supposed to see between 4.59-5.42 i don't get it? this is science

[ladgefull]

@gamesisfunny

Not this video

Youtube - Barry Shitpeas and Co and look at the bit between 04.59 05.42 .For a so called man of science , you are rather stupid.

[gamesisfunny]

@ladgefull well what i am arguing is that this video is nothing bad man :) some others may be but this is just fine

[ladgefull]

@gamesisfunny

I give up , I think it's fine to , I was making a joke.

[gamesisfunny]

@ladgefull lol

[TheSpankymonkey]

@ladgefull - They are doing no such thing. You might find it fine to bastardise the actions of others, however it would you serve you better in life to shut the fuck up.

[alexisation]

Just image what you can do with that tongue and were to stick it

[ben31584]

I'm studying biology, and I get to disect a full grown giraffe on monday! It' s gonna be one hell of a mess. Can't wait! :-D

[respectbluder]

@ben31584 how did it turn out

[ben31584]

@respectbluder Well....kinda interesting. But the giraffe was dead for a week or so and stored without cooling. So I spent a lot of time fighting with the urge to puke myself inside out while stripping runny flesh from the bones with a way too small knife. Had to throw away my clothes afterwards, cause they'll never get daisyfresh again. Apart from that it was quite cool.

[holymackerel013]

I had the opportunity to let a giraffe eat from my hands recently. It's tongue was huge. It was a really nice moment for me to even get near one of these great animals.

[UkPR0]

african bush

[omier2]

do i get to do this at school???

[AceofDlamonds]

idiots....animals die in zoos all the time....not so unusual

[shababsta]

nomnomnomnomnomnomnomn 

[magmablood2]

@DMEN03 Your brain is full of ignorance....

[TheBellaTenenbaum]

He sure would make a nice purse...

[DNAunion]

Yeah, I voted it down.

Why both to post the video if you are going to cover it with a "Click here to watch in high definition" message, that also covers the whole video window in a hazy, mikly color, making it had to see what's going on? Post the God damn video regularly, asshole.

[khal3687]

@DNAunion just click the little speech bubble button

[schwantes4]

First, before 'scientifically' proving evolution, what about the microscopic pathways of the nerve? Since it was the first time it was dissected how can you with all the technology, just decided not to investigate it microscopically before announcing to the captive young ears that the designer was not so intelligent?

[drche420]

@schwantes4

This is not the first time a giraffe has been dissected.

And evolution is a fact.

[schwantes4]

@drche420 I thought I heard in the video that this was the first time...and thanks for sharing your strong conviction. I m just tired of so much arrogance in all sides of the issue.

[drche420]

@schwantes4

It may have been the first time on tv or something, but do you really think that all the animal vets ever lived never dissected a giraffe, ever? Its ludacrous.

Strong conviction? Look up the word fact, then research evolution. Then you'll agree.

[DMEN03]

@drche420 how is it a fact? what is the origin? explain speech

[drche420]

@DMEN03

Evolution = Change over time = Fact. The Theory of Evolution , however, is model that describes the process of how this change occured and is still occuring. The exact details of the process of evolution is debated constantly, but the evolution itself has a been a widely known fact for hundreds of years. Please, try gettin your information from a nonbiased source. (Biased source = Fox News = Creationist Website = SACS)

[puncheex]

@schwantes4: I gather form the discussion that while this is the first time it has been dissected whole since the 1830s, that it is no mystery to them; I deduce that it has been examined microscopically enough to know that it hold no special mysteries from the same nerve in all other tetrapods. The "captive young ears" are students of animal science; they are being taught not only the specifics of their trade but the overlying theories that determine what they may expect to find in general.

[puncheex]

... What exactly do you suggest they should be learning? Kipling's Just So stories?

Sorry. This is a class in science, not in pop culture.

[schwantes4]

@puncheex I think that before the students blend facts with interpretations they have the right to be exposed to both theories, and as Dawkins himself admits, the source of DNA information could be preexistent intelligence.( just not God) This is more like a religion than a science demonstration for me. How can you be a scientist when you assume your theory is the only one that is not ridiculous.

[puncheex]

@schwantes4: But creationism is not a theory. It doesn't predict findings, it's "experiments" are not repeatable and it is not falsifiable. Please demonstrate to me how creationism could have been presented at this dissection in order to make any point except the trivial.

A scientist is one that goes where the evidence leads. It can explain the odd nerve, the neck and the tall legs, the arrangement of the lungs and the heart muscle. Creationism cannot. And you said "ridiculous", not me.

[SumthinMstBAvailable]

Such A Beautiful Animal.

[EllysaE]

omg that yellow ligament would taste so good.

[puncheex]

@EllysaE: Yeah, like one of those rubber doggy bones.

[EllysaE]

@puncheex noo it would taste like the rubbery part on a porkchop. Lækker!

[MilitantOldLady]

eeeeeeyyy.....i like Mark Eveans more when he builds cars and planes more then when he plays with dead animals :D

[billythomas18]

does any1 know if this will be on dvd and when?

[drche420]

@billythomas18

dude, you're connected to the internet

[xxxGRENADESxxx]

So they killed it to do that?!

[majooismajor]

NO!

They would never kill it to study it .... when it dies in a zoo ... they take the opportunity to disect it

lots of african animals r very endangered or r hard to breed or kept for its beauty in zoo's ...

so they would never kill it ...but when it dies they use it to learn :)

[bioshockfan14]

no it died accidentally ... same as with the crocodile ... the crocodile could not digest anything because something stuck and died from hunger ...i think

[Biankito]

Very educational, thank you for sharing this!

[maythegiant]

@drstupid1 -- well if monkeys evolved from a species, that in turn wouldn't be a monkey, right? Otherwise it would be the same species. I guess you could call it a primate, though I'm not sure about that either.

[John27346]

The word monkey does not denote a species, rather a group of species, or more specifically a family of groups of species.

[rjohn19]

Richard, you silly goose- Anyone who has read anything knows the giraffe was created by Ford Prefect.

[drstupid1]

I once had an argument with a "born-again" creationist who was taught that fossil dinosaur skeletons were actually just giraffes that the scientists put back together wrong (deliberately or by accident??). And he claimed he was very well informed about these things. Sadly the only book he would read was the bible and church-related literature. Why are they all so scared about evolution anyway??! We came from monkeys.. DEAL WITH IT!

[newperve]

What part of the giraffe did they mistake for the teeth of a Tyrannosaurus?

[NecrosisOfLight]

Well, we didn't. Our relation to monkeys is more distant cousins then descendant.

[askmyname727]

Exactly !!!

[drstupid1]

sorry... the common ancestor of monkeys (humans) and monkeys is.. guess what.. A MONKEY! Since no fossil record of this beast has been found (yet) there is still debate as to what it would look like. However, if it were alive today it would fit most peoples definition of a monkey. Using the fossils we have and DNA, a hypothetical ancestor has been proposed (you can google it..) .. actually it looks a lot like a lemur. Although we didnt evolve from modern day monkeys, we did evolve from A monkey!

[NecrosisOfLight]

Most people's definition of ignorance is as a synonym for arrogance, that doesn't make it true however

[askmyname727]

i Agree i was saying "Exactly" to your first comment about Creationists.

[vikramkrishnan]

I bet they would claim that Satan put the teeth there, just as he put eggs and other carnivorous reptilian anatomical bits

[KaraRvn]

@drstupid1 Exactly. Can't he just not interpret the book literally, like plenty of other Christians do? I mean, if people can concoct elaborate apologetics about all other aspects of Christianity, why not say, like other branches of that religion, that "six days" wasn't literal?

[blamb1]

@drstupid1 technically I think the expression is "we have a common ancestor with monkeys", or something similar

[volound]

@drstupid1 actually we share a common, but very recent, ancestor with monkeys. that is why monkeys are still here. if we came from them then we would replace them.

saying "we came from monkeys" really doesnt help to educate the morons. it gives them an excuse to be ignorant.

[patrickledford420]

@volound even if we did come from them it doesnt mean they would be gone, look at celocanthes

[volound]

@patrickledford420 we cant come from them and share a common ancestor with them at the same time.

[patrickledford420]

@volound i know that but i was saying if we just decended from them and didnt share a common ancestor they could still be alive today but i know what you are saying

[volound]

@patrickledford420 thats assuming we were separated from them and placed in a different environment and their environment wasnt selective at all, which never happens.

[patrickledford420]

@volound actually that does happen, not much but it does happen. when populations drift into a different enviroment while there is still some in the original enviroment, im guessing you see what im saying

[volound]

@patrickledford420 of course, but evolution doesnt just stop because there is no environmental pressure.

[patrickledford420]

@volound oh yes, i know this but it would go in a different direction in a different enviroment and things like the celocanthe may stay fundamentally the same with only slight change also like crocodiles

[volound]

@patrickledford420 yes. the more drastic the change in environment the more accelerated the evolution, assuming it isnt so drastic that it kills the species or genus. so saying humans came from monkeys is like saying that chihuahuas came from highland terriers. for example.

[patrickledford420]

@volound yes

[7Supernova7]

@drstupid1 why,? because the churches and the religion would loose folowers,, that means less money,,, thats all,, just money

[DMEN03]

@7Supernova7 you've been to the wrong church

[DMEN03]

@drstupid1 you still have time to learn and repent.

[MooMooCow95]

@drstupid1 Actually, the bible does talk about dinosaurs. So whoever this person you were talking to was, they were taught wrong.

[SeanMc]

Mix some of the genes with an egg and we humans can create Peter Crouch again.

[sifhydraulic]

Awesome :D. It's so nice to be subscribed to a fellow atheist with all the videos that interest me greatly.