Police have no CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to protect YOU!

[bubbiesdad]

'You don't need a gun, the GOVERNMENT will protect you." Police dispatcher should have been fired and jailed.

[Ariodude]

What case is this anyways??

[THAWK3]

@Ariodude

Google "Police have no constitutional duty to protect you" and the new york times should be the first link.

[glennboy28]

but isnt it there job to uphold the law and prrotect the citizens

[THAWK3]

@glennboy28

Job?

No, we are talking obligations here.They have none.

Look,"Law" is just a mans legal opinion= "Statutes".Tell me how an unsigned piece of paper created an obligation on my body?

All govt. is is a transfer of wealth scheme under the guise of(but it's SO transparent)an open protection racket.You pay or get shot.And if they fail in protecting you.....sorry we owe you no duty-hence the racket,cause they won't let you hire somebody else for protection.

[glennboy28]

@glennboy28 no see i thought police were paid to stop crime from happening not if they feel like stopping crime

[THAWK3]

@glennboy28

Then why is there inner-city drug violence....no,no ask any cop-they will tell you they have full discretion.

Why else would they let people go sometimes when they have a little weed on them.

But seriously dude, you can't argue with observational reality-this is the end result.

[IRSFRAUDEXPOSED]

Im guessen they dont owe you no protection but only themselves is because we have the same right we are the police aka the militia we the armed citizenry are to defended our state . in a local setting the sheriff may have deputies who work on a official level not as a ONLY people.

They have no obligation just as we dont ?

[THAWK3]

Think like this-How does an unsigned piece of paper create any obligation?

[almartin77]

There are no courts in America that will decide a case against it's own interest. Can you say corruption? The courts are morally debased.

[THAWK3]

Look,the only reason why they are govt. is because they owe a duty for protection-it's a reciprocal obligation with a citizen.They offer a duty of protection,in return for our duty of alligence,which is what a citizen is.BUT-if they openly admit they have NO DUTY TO PROTECT YOU,then how could you be a citizen,cause according to the Supreme Court "Opinion" a citizen is a member of the body politic who gives alligence for protection-WITHOUT THOSE 2 RECIPROCAL OBLIGATIONS,THERE IS NO "STATE"!!!

[andrewbnkjv]

Boo ya. Buy a gun, teach safety. Watch old Yeller with your kids if you have to.

[andrewbnkjv]

Wow, great perspective.