FDNY guys at the scene said Building 7 was "on fire from top to bottom" and had a giant scoop taken out of the side from one of the towers collapsing. Any firefighter that tries to say the FDNY was involved in bringing down the towers has absolutely no shame. We only get 1 life and you people are wasting it on this?
@NefariousEquivocator if bombs were placed while the buildings were on fire it had to have been FDNY guys. and not ONE GUY who placed any bombs in the towers has come forward with a guilty conscience in almost 10 years? the allegations of 9/11 truthers are just not possible at all
@Etsuvol, I have no idea where you get your information on 9/11 but I can say I have never heard anyone accuse firefighters of planting bombs.
What A/E 9/11 truth and Firefighters for 9/11 truth is asking for is an investigation according to national standards and one that holds people accountable.
NO ONE has been held accountable for 9/11, just promotions for those who kept quite and didn't ask questions.
@NefariousEquivocator Nobody is conducting further investigations because what Truthers want investigated is physically impossible. Every Truther question only yields more questions. Why even crash planes into buildings that already had explosives in them? Nothing about Truther theories on 9/11 makes any sense.
@etsuVol "why even crash planes' ??? They were trying to make it look like a terrorist attack but anyone with open eyes and an open mind can see there was more to it then just that, not just "truthers" as you call them.
You have had nothing but weak rediculous strawman arguments that make absolutely no sense.
@NefariousEquivocator I'm not the one making weak, ridiculous arguments...anybody saying explosives brought down the towers or WTC 7 are. If they just wanted to make it look like a terrorist attack why not use only the explosives like in the 1993 WTC attack? Like I keep saying, the claims made by anybody questioning a combination of plane crash and fires bringing the towers down is proposing the impossible. Explosives that can withstand plane impact plus fire for over an hour? No way.
Oh come on! The official 911 story is true. Bush & Cheney were totally honest about 911 & laws of physics were suspended on 9/11. This firefiighter & all the other truthers are being too logical. 3 little fires brought down building 7 & it came down looking JUST LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, but it wasn't. The twin towers came down because of hot jet fuel. DON'T BELIEVE YOUR OWN EYES & STOP TRYING TO BE SO LOGICAL! You were given the official story. This wasn't like the other false-flag attacks.
* 41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11: "a Cover-up," "Terribly Flawed," "Laced with Contradictions," "a Joke"
SOURCE: PatriotsQuestion911.(com) - Remove ()s to view link.
Zero (by a Nobel Prize Winner) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA
-----------------------------------
* 84% of New Yorker's Reject the Official 9/11 Story - Saying there is a cover up.
In 2006 CBS and NY Times ran an extensive poll with these results@
* Undeniable - 100% Proof of Molten Steel and Explosives. @ watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU
Neither fires nor a collapse could create molten steel. Even NIST admitted that the temperatures needed to create molten metal and merge steel together - could not have happened due to the official explanation of the collapse
Debunkers skip what they cannot explain:
A straight forward video of NIST discussing this, and the irrefutable evidence of Molten Steel. I hope you actually check into both sides of the debate
If it was demolition, and since the collapses started at the plane impact points, only 2 cases are possible: the demo charges were placed beforehand and the planes hit the exact spots, or the planes hit the towers and the charges were then carried up 80 stories and placed. Both of these are IMPOSSIBLE and LAUGHABLE. Plus, since there is video of the Tower lobby during the collapse we know there were no explosions at ground level, despite what witnesses say they heard. Truthers are disgusting.
Richard Gage and Steven Jones will be proved wrong though I still honor them for their work. Molecular disassociation brought down the towers. Structural steel cannot rust unless certain molecules are eliminated from them first, turning them to iron. Pictures show steel beams in the rubble completely rusted. Totally impossible unless some type of technology hitherto unknown in conventional science was utilized.
The truth shall prevail and there will be a new New World Order.
42BYnot 1 year ago
FDNY guys at the scene said Building 7 was "on fire from top to bottom" and had a giant scoop taken out of the side from one of the towers collapsing. Any firefighter that tries to say the FDNY was involved in bringing down the towers has absolutely no shame. We only get 1 life and you people are wasting it on this?
etsuVol 1 year ago
estuVol you are way off.
No one is accusing FDNY of being involved.
NefariousEquivocator 1 year ago 10
@NefariousEquivocator if bombs were placed while the buildings were on fire it had to have been FDNY guys. and not ONE GUY who placed any bombs in the towers has come forward with a guilty conscience in almost 10 years? the allegations of 9/11 truthers are just not possible at all
etsuVol 1 year ago
@Etsuvol, I have no idea where you get your information on 9/11 but I can say I have never heard anyone accuse firefighters of planting bombs.
What A/E 9/11 truth and Firefighters for 9/11 truth is asking for is an investigation according to national standards and one that holds people accountable.
NO ONE has been held accountable for 9/11, just promotions for those who kept quite and didn't ask questions.
NefariousEquivocator 1 year ago 9
@NefariousEquivocator Nobody is conducting further investigations because what Truthers want investigated is physically impossible. Every Truther question only yields more questions. Why even crash planes into buildings that already had explosives in them? Nothing about Truther theories on 9/11 makes any sense.
etsuVol 1 year ago
@etsuVol "why even crash planes' ??? They were trying to make it look like a terrorist attack but anyone with open eyes and an open mind can see there was more to it then just that, not just "truthers" as you call them.
You have had nothing but weak rediculous strawman arguments that make absolutely no sense.
NefariousEquivocator 1 year ago 15
@NefariousEquivocator I'm not the one making weak, ridiculous arguments...anybody saying explosives brought down the towers or WTC 7 are. If they just wanted to make it look like a terrorist attack why not use only the explosives like in the 1993 WTC attack? Like I keep saying, the claims made by anybody questioning a combination of plane crash and fires bringing the towers down is proposing the impossible. Explosives that can withstand plane impact plus fire for over an hour? No way.
etsuVol 1 year ago
Yes we should spend our life listening to what the government and mainstream media tell us, and focus on the real enemy which is the Arabs!!!
How dare you question and research!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How dare these hundreds of firemen sign on!!
How dare 1200 Arch's and Engineers sign a petition!!
MayabongExperience 1 year ago 27
This is a fantastic presentation by Mr. Erik Lawyer.
If only All Americans could hear this.
GruesomeTruth 1 year ago 62
Oh come on! The official 911 story is true. Bush & Cheney were totally honest about 911 & laws of physics were suspended on 9/11. This firefiighter & all the other truthers are being too logical. 3 little fires brought down building 7 & it came down looking JUST LIKE A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, but it wasn't. The twin towers came down because of hot jet fuel. DON'T BELIEVE YOUR OWN EYES & STOP TRYING TO BE SO LOGICAL! You were given the official story. This wasn't like the other false-flag attacks.
RestoreConstitution8 1 year ago 5
Im trying to figure out if your being cute, or you dont believe that some one brought down the buildings
darrellmellissa 1 year ago
* 41 U.S. Counter-Terrorism and Intelligence Agency Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11: "a Cover-up," "Terribly Flawed," "Laced with Contradictions," "a Joke"
SOURCE: PatriotsQuestion911.(com) - Remove ()s to view link.
Zero (by a Nobel Prize Winner) @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA
-----------------------------------
* 84% of New Yorker's Reject the Official 9/11 Story - Saying there is a cover up.
In 2006 CBS and NY Times ran an extensive poll with these results@
Tinyurl(dot)com/yek5c5s
DoYouCareAboutTruth 1 year ago
If you really care about your country please check these out
Undeniable - 100% Proof of Molten Steel . Temperatures neither fires nor the collapse could produce. @ watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU
911 Connect the Dots is a great 18 min video @ watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE
Nobel Prize Winner's Video on 9/11 @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA
Verifiable Science and Physics - 911 @ watch?v=K2Mor7udxJI&
Thermite Scientifically Confirmed in 911 @ watch?v=Vy1oPmuZZ98&
Click on the Peer Reviewed Primary Article in the description!
DoYouCareAboutTruth 1 year ago
* Undeniable - 100% Proof of Molten Steel and Explosives. @ watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU
Neither fires nor a collapse could create molten steel. Even NIST admitted that the temperatures needed to create molten metal and merge steel together - could not have happened due to the official explanation of the collapse
Debunkers skip what they cannot explain:
A straight forward video of NIST discussing this, and the irrefutable evidence of Molten Steel. I hope you actually check into both sides of the debate
DoYouCareAboutTruth 1 year ago 3
If it was demolition, and since the collapses started at the plane impact points, only 2 cases are possible: the demo charges were placed beforehand and the planes hit the exact spots, or the planes hit the towers and the charges were then carried up 80 stories and placed. Both of these are IMPOSSIBLE and LAUGHABLE. Plus, since there is video of the Tower lobby during the collapse we know there were no explosions at ground level, despite what witnesses say they heard. Truthers are disgusting.
etsuVol 1 year ago
Richard Gage and Steven Jones will be proved wrong though I still honor them for their work. Molecular disassociation brought down the towers. Structural steel cannot rust unless certain molecules are eliminated from them first, turning them to iron. Pictures show steel beams in the rubble completely rusted. Totally impossible unless some type of technology hitherto unknown in conventional science was utilized.
JZJYRWO 2 years ago
@JZJYRWO
with all due respect, this kind of steel is known to us in the trades as 'red iron'.
besides, lots of steel components have rust on them by the time they are welded in place.
That's good you respect Mr Gage and Dr Jones.
peace
Research0digo 1 year ago