9/11 Probability Files: The Miracle Pilots (Part 1)

[spawnofstardust]

im still pretty pissed the truth hasn't come out about this. it wasn't holograms, come on people, that's just putting the veil on it thicker. it's obvious what happened & why but "THEY" will neVer come out & say it of course.

[tdebat]

According to John Lear (lear jets) a pilot doing this would be a real trick.

[reebok3d]

in your vid go to @1:35 look at the right wing, it disappears then reappears a second later..

the planes were HOLOGRAMS!!!

search youtube... type in 911 holograms...

no BS, look at all the different clips of the planes hittin the towers, they glitch in all of them...

[TalessiansReality]

@reebok3d I'm not a fan of the hologram plane theory. Regardless, my theory focuses on the probability of two airlines (or flying objects) hitting each separate tower on the first try. The probability tells it all for me.

[reebok3d]

@TalessiansReality that is true, the probability tells it all, what are the odds of two planes hitn like they did... its cause they were holograms... did you look at the clip in this vid that you put up? it clearly shows the wing glitch, even other vids that show that same plane from a different angle show the wind disappear... so what do you really think happened then? they were remote controlled?? cause if they were remore controlled... how do you explain the glitches?

[TalessiansReality]

@reebok3d I've looked over the video. I do not see any disappearing wing. I do see the wing change as the plane changes angle. I have watched airplanes take off and land for many years when I was younger, the plane's characteristics are totally within realism and look and appear very real to me. In fact, the pilot did a great job (whoever it was). I mean this was good flyin. But if my views change, I will report it. You make a video on it maybe. Explain it.

[LiquidR1Ryder]

@TalessiansReality

Not sure how you can possibly miss the disappearing wing, it's in numerous videos. The wing simply vanishes into thin air. I was against the hologram theory until I carefully watched it over and over again, the wing completely missing in several frames of video.

[GeorgeAlexanderOz]

Zero agreement with the collapse statement. Nada. The planes did not cause the collapse. The fuel did not cause the columns to melt. Read Judy Wood's "Where Did The Towers Go?". Highly recommended. Without reading it, no informed decision is possible. It's a must.

[GeorgeAlexanderOz]

Happy New Year from Berlin, Germany.

[GeorgeAlexanderOz]

Good approach. There is an inconsistency in your argument. If you grant the pilots the capability to professionally fly the aircraft according to assumption 2, assumption 1 can't be appropriate. Their intention is more effective and thus affects assumption 1. With effective intention, flying an aircraft is to a lesser degree like throwing dice.

[GeorgeAlexanderOz]

@GeorgeAlexanderOz The real capability of the pilots would bring the flight closer to throwing dice. However, the number of outcomes would become huge, since the probable crash area would expand to the flight range with the fuel available, a crash right after taking over the aircraft included. Assumptions 1 and 2 are in a delicate way interdependent. The pilots must not be too good, but they must be good enough to at least reach New York for the dice to be thrown on the right table.

[GeorgeAlexanderOz]

@GeorgeAlexanderOz Assumption 3 also depends on the skill of the pilots, i.e. assumption 2. More experienced pilots would to a lesser degree need a rehearsal.

Assumption 4 is inaccurate. The smoke column from a successfull strike makes the second flight somewhat easier.

But WTF, I can live with the assumptions for the sake of argument. However, if you plan to write a peer-reviewed paper on that, these things must be considered.

[TalessiansReality]

@GeorgeAlexanderOz Assumption #1 says that my list of 22 possible outcomes are all "likely." From that diagram. I don't see how piloting skill affects that.

[GeorgeAlexanderOz]

@TalessiansReality In reality, piloting skills do effect the outcome. I understand that you postulate the outcomes all be equally likely. Be it so, for the sake of demonstration.

The odds you call are nowhere near the real number, but your idea is still fine.

[Mandems96]

nicely said

[CP91311]

An accelerated stall is a stall that occurs while the aircraft is experiencing a load factor higher than 1 (1g), for example while turning or pulling up from a dive. In these conditions, the aircraft stalls at higher speeds than the normal stall speed (which always refers to straight and level flight. Do the math?

[FarahWonderland7]

Good points.

[blakespower]

oh cool you did post a video today.

[JustAMan400]

That is to easy, they programmed the the G.P.S. , they had simulator games that would show people how to program the control panel to an exact location.

[KageKeeper]

I love this mathematical approach to this. I knew taking statistics was going to help me someday. Thanks so much Paris! <3

[ARTILECT4U]

WHAT'S THE ODD's???

[ARTILECT4U]

WHAT'S THE ODD's???

[ARTILECT4U]

WHAT'S THE ODD's???

[ARTILECT4U]

WHAT'S THE ODD's???

[ARTILECT4U]

WHAT'S THE ODD's???

[TalessiansReality]

@ARTILECT4U Coming in Part 2

[chemtrails70794]

@TalessiansReality

Other parts are not needed - as well as they didnt need any 767´s to bring the towers down with the speed of free fall. collect money,build an exact copy of one of the towers,hammer it with 10 767´s and the world will see that nothing will collapse in the way it did.

better watch out for the day theyre hijackig a us submarine,with their boxcutters and a snorkel...

[ARTILECT4U]

I FEEL SO BAD...you never mentioned the third tower...that fell DOWN for SYMPATHY!!!

[TalessiansReality]

@ARTILECT4U Tower 7 fell down because it was laughing hysterically at the lunacy going on. That's my guess.

[drummer4hire12]

@TalessiansReality ....lol

[ARTILECT4U]

@TalessiansReality good guess....HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!

aloha & shalom

[MarsHasLife]

@ARTILECT4U "The Fire Burned it down... "

[robran53]

The airplanes did not bring the towers down. The buildings did not collapse or implode upon themselves. They were blown up, exploded.

Go back and look at the videos of their 'collapse'. The tops of the towers were pulverized immediately. The towers fell at near free-fall speed - an impossibilty in a floor collapsing on lower floors. Were the planes actually real? I believe they were real planes - but were remotely controlled - a technology that has been around for over 30 years.

[TalessiansReality]

@robran53 Wait for Parts 2 and 3.

[itsadeadmansparty]

@robran53 I bet all planes can be remotely controlled, what you think about that? what if the onboard system was infected with a virus? or remotely controlled? hypothetically speaking of course, i bet its possible. this video rocks

[robran53]

@itsadeadmansparty It's not just theoretically possible - it's an established decades-old technology. I think Paris understands that fact.

[itsadeadmansparty]

@robran53 I just wanted to say I agreed with you, and I am thinking your idea wouldve been the easiest way to send the plane astray.

take care too

[itsadeadmansparty]

Paris Paris, you are so good at drawing, I have seen all your videos, you draw soo good!

[peacefulpatriots]

I have seen some very convincing stuff showing NO Planes.

[snifflesofdeath]

@peacefulpatriots i one2 go to there