I think you have to add the satire warning because fundamentalist religious people who are on a crusade from god, are one of the few groups that defy any attempt at satire.
For the longest time I thought Edward Current was serious, and he's more sane then some of the people he mocks.
I'm an evolutionary biologist, and there are several things in this video that are wrong. Very very wrong. Not everything evolves into humans you dumb cunt. How dare you make a video that would say such ignorant things. I do however, obviously agree that religion is utter nonsense, and some things in the video are correct. It's still a shit video.
It's hard to be as ridiculous as the real religious stuff, but this is pretty hilarious. Couldn't stop chuckling. Wanted to do a face palm, but had to keep watching.
@Adamillionaire123 Well, HE doesn't have an invisible friend. So who's the FUNNY guy here? You pawned yourself on so many levels with your post, it's not even funny...eh, what ever!
@Adamillionaire123 We came from perturbations and quantum fluctuations of space time. Remember it is A Crash Course of Evolution so nothing is a close approximation. This video and your belief in god is what are humorous. Stop believing in the Stone Age and Bronze Age philosophies that the majority of the world believes in.
This is some hilarious stuff. I just watched the Gravity crash course, and wasn't disappointed with either one. Do you take suggestions? If you don't, then you are a non-gravity-worshiping nazi! Either way, you did one in physics and now biology, how about something on light or maybe quantum... uh, QED or something. I mean really, do they expect us to believe that magic mumbo-jumbo they are doing?
It's sad there is no distinction between videos like this and actual creationist videos. They live with an all or nothing mentality. Either you believe all the bullshit or you don't believe anything at all.
Some people really have no sense of humor and satire. This is obviously a parody of all the creationist "arguments"! And creationists are so totally stupid that they are unable to read any science book on astronomy and evolution, so just repeat what they heard from a creationist "experts"!
Wait a minute, what about crocoduck, and banana "argument"! ? ;-)
@chattiestspike2 I'm not sure i understand your question. I've seen enough of your videos to know what you stand for. And by the way... i'm still sorry that so many people use the type of ignorant argument you present in this video.
Nothing better than satire that is so good every other comment I read seems to think you are serious. Is there an actual gene for satire detection? Like it is a skill only about half of us have? I mean it has to be. There are just way too many people that can't grasp it on Youtube for it to be. What's more hilarious is the religious consider this stuff so ridiculous they think you owned yourself, yet they believe in Noah's Ark. Pro Tip: If it is ridiculous, don't just believe it is true.
@chattiestspike2 in case you havent figured it out...have you figured out that only evolutionists and atheists misunderstood this video???no wonder why they are evolutionists(or atheists) ...just like you...
@giska1000 that's incorrect in two ways. First off, most atheists and "evolutionists" understood that this was satire while a few of them thought I was a creationist strawmanning evolution. Second off, a few creationists thought I was a creationist as well.
@chattiestspike2 ummm..i can only see here dumb ass evolutionists and atheists that shows(beside lack of basic knowledge and education) also...lack of sense of humor....
@giska1000 Look who's talking about the lack of basic knowledge and education. Also I think you're the one who has no sense of humor. Since you're probably creationist, when someone makes fun of your stupid statements you can clearly find yourself offended. Evolutionists have basic education and knowledge (as opposed to some fool) otherwise they would not be scientists in the first place.
@ExtremeMadnessX ahah umm....kid....1.i am IDrs...and even if i was creationist so what?? 2.you are little noob..classic jobless you tube wannabe ,,scientist,, ...and 3. AH AHA HAHAH AAA HAAAAA....evolutionists have ,,basic knowledge,, and ,,thats why they are scientists,, ???ok....kid....dont you ever reply to me again you little ignorant piece of shit....ok?? :))) until you finish your kindergarten,then elementary school,and highschool...and after that at least try to get BSc...dont talk to me
@giska1000 Oh yes, intelligent design as not the same as creationism (because ID is a true "science" LOL). Yeah right! I did not even say that I am a scientist, I unlike you am not ignorant and total asshole who ignores scientific findings and discoveries. And evolution has long been proved, are constantly re-prove, experiments in laboratories and in nature and can be monitored in real time. At least I'm not in kindergarten, unlike you!People like you should be declared as mentally retarded!
@ExtremeMadnessX umm kid you are an extreme idiot....first of all...i am BSc and MSc in(biology,microbiology,biochemistry and genetics) and diploma owner in philosophy and history...so PLEASE dont talk to me about science little kid :))) ...and i can bet that you newer saw any scientific article in your life...you only saw some articles from talkorigins or physorg and sites like that...including wikipedia...LOL...-.- ...and this last segment of ,,evolution being proved,,...yeah...i dont need...
@ExtremeMadnessX ..to reply to you anymore..since you as an ignorant kid...dont even know what evolution means...not to mention if i ask you when is it proved or observed you wont even be able to show one example....:))) ehhhh...poor kids...
@giska1000 So smart guy explain what evolution means, and what have you heard about evolution. Here's the simplest examples with an animal that lives for example in the polar circle. Animal breeding dozen pups, of which several of which they have fur density as well as a mother, a few pups through mutation rarely got fur, and two cubs are born with an even denser fur.
@ExtremeMadnessX first dont teach me about evolution ok?i think that with BSc and MSc degrees in biology,microbiology,genetics and biochemistry i know what evolution is and what evolution means....but evolution...true evolution would be progress over time...(no its not change over time like you want to think)....so examples you gave are NOTHING more than variation within specie ....variation or minor change due to adaptation in certain environment is observable fact knows from the very first day
@giska1000 uh huh... I just read your comments about what you think is wrong with evolution. I must say, with a BSc and MSc in biology, microbiology, genetics and biochemistry, you sure are a complete idiot. An utter moron. Now I feel very confident in saying this because because based on what you just said, you don't have those degrees or at the very least don't deserve those degrees.
If you DO have those degrees, then you are just flat out being dishonest.
@chattiestspike2 uh huh... I just read your comments about what you think is wrong with evolution. I must say, with a BSc and MSc in biology, microbiology, genetics and biochemistry, you sure are a complete idiot. An utter moron.
...ummm..well..first of all you dont have to go to personal insults and accusations when you dont know me dear friend..and 2nd..you better prepare some proof for every claim you making for evolution....i alredy know every argument ...well.. ,,aegument,, that comes...
@chattiestspike2 ..from evolutionists....so dont worry...everything i say or claim is backed up by latest...very latestr scientific research....so everything i say here...you can ask me to give you articles or even videos(like for example video and article from Dr Craig Venter about ,,darwins tree of life,, and ,,common ancestor,, being OUTDATED MYTH AND one big ball of bullshit) ...
you don't have those degrees or at the very least don't deserve those degrees.
@chattiestspike2 ...why??maybe because i rejected absurd theory of evolution....oh and btw does John Sanford..world leading geneticist,inventor of gene gun and over 30 other patterns,an professor from Cornell University deserve his PhD ??because he was darwinist himself....now he is YEC...hmmm...is he dumb and he dont have PhD too???and xxxx other scientists and professors that reject theory of evolution???oh...and one good news...for me of course...:)) i ll send you article that from june 8th..
@chattiestspike2 ..or 9th i think...in which GENETIC ENTROPY IS CONFIRMED...:))) just like John Sanford in his book in 2005 said....DNA declining .it cannot be older than...well...15 000 years at its best...according to John Sanford..:))))
see.. there you go. what the fuck definition of biological evolution are you playing with? Sounds like a creationist definition to me which conveniently fits sorta well with your thermodynamics crap.
...ummm...ahahaha..funny thing is..this is how ALL ...
@chattiestspike2 ..professors,scientists and evolutionists without any degree here in europe say about evolution...PROGRESS over time....dont you say to me that now it became ,,change,, over time...OF COURSE THAT EVERYONE KNOWS THAT EVERYTHING CHANGES over time..dont be fool....but evolution plays with progress....dont you say to me that bactaria just ,,changed,, into 1.6 to 1.8 million KNOWN species in the world today..:))) it had to PROGRESS...
@giska1000 "true evolution would be progress over time...(no its not change over time like you want to think)"
see.. there you go. what the fuck definition of biological evolution are you playing with? Sounds like a creationist definition to me which conveniently fits sorta well with your thermodynamics crap. No it's not "progress," it IS changes over time. These changes are often beneficial. Progress means there's an end goal. There's no end goal with evolution.
@chattiestspike2 No it's not "progress," it IS changes over time. These changes are often beneficial. Progress means there's an end goal. There's no end goal with evolution.ž
..ahaha...funny thing is..this is not DARWINIAN theory of evolution...but whatever...i will concentrate on this BENEFICIAL thing...name me any ,,beneficial,, mutation or ,,change,, can you??(btw i alredy know what you ll say but just for the sake of formality) :))) cmon lets go....??
@giska1000 I'll give you a tip- next time you want to claim to have all that credibility to up the chances that people will believe what you say just because YOU say it.. well.. don't. That's not how the world works. Maybe that's how YOU work and you're just following other creationists' footsteps.
Say that you're a student of biology so at least you can say you are still learning. You will at least have an excuse why you would be saying such stupid things.
@ExtremeMadnessX ...of mans life....but to believe that one specie ..or kind...can transform into another more complex kind is absurd..its science fiction ....every change you see amongst species happens withing DNA...loss of recombination,or sometimes in duplication of DNA genome...it newer progress and increases...because DNA works only with available information and of course as before 3 days DNA genetic entropy is CONFIRMED just as John Sanford in his 2005th book alredy explained....we know
@ExtremeMadnessX ..today that DNA just like EVERYTHING ELSE obeys 2nd law of thermodyns. and it declining..and it DECLINED eversince it came inot existence....btw specie...hmmm..what do you mean by spoecie???
Coyne and H. Allen Orr published a detailed book titled Speciation, in which they noted that biologists have not been able to agree on a definition of "species" because no single definition fits every case.
@ExtremeMadnessX For example, a definition applicable to living, sexually reproducing organisms might make no sense when applied to fossils or bacteria. In fact, there are more than 25 definitions of "species." What definition is best?
..hhmmm..??we dont even know what specie is...because we have now over 25 different definition of what specie is but none of them fulfills criteria to be accepted as true...:))) so kid..how can you talk about ,,new specie,, when you dont even know what it means?
@giska1000 You really have too much free time, all these examples that you mentioned, scientists have long discussed. Evolution does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because it is not a closed system, life uses an external power source (the Sun) is transmitted through the food chain that begins with photosynthesis in plants.
@ExtremeMadnessX Evolution does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because it is not a closed system
...first of all...it is WITHIN closed system...the universe...2nd
It is commonly argued that the spectacular increase in order which has occurred on Earth does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because the Earth is an open system, and anything can happen in an open system as long as the entropy increases outside the system compensate...
@ExtremeMadnessX ...the entropy decreases inside the system. However, if we define "X-entropy" to be the entropy associated with any diffusing component X (for example, X might be heat), and, since entropy measures disorder, "X-order" to be the negative of X-entropy, a closer look at the equations for entropy change shows that they not only say that the X-order cannot increase in a closed system, but that they also say that in an open system the X-order...
@ExtremeMadnessX ...cannot increase faster than it is imported through the boundary. Thus the equations for entropy change do not support the illogical "compensation" idea; instead, they illustrate the tautology that "if an increase in order is extremely improbable when a system is closed, it is still extremely improbable when the system is open, unless something is entering which makes it not extremely improbable".....
@ExtremeMadnessX ...Thus, unless we are willing to argue that the influx of solar energy into the Earth makes the appearance of spaceships, computers and the Internet not extremely improbable, we have to conclude that the second law has in fact been violated here.
so my friend...if you think that by ,,adding energy,, (without something to control and utilize it) you can overcome 2nd law of thermodyns. and somehow survive amount of Sun heat and UV lights....you are more than foolish.....
@giska1000 And when we have the definition of species here is one example from my old biology textbooks from elementary school: The very nature are constantly occurring changes which affect the living world. If a separate long-term small groups of individuals of certain species due to unequal processes (mutation, selection and other factors) that occur between individuals at different venues groups are increasingly differ.
@giska1000 When the separation between groups of individuals differences so great that they can not reproduce with each other, we say that the separate groups of individuals through the process of speciation are gradually becoming new species.
@ExtremeMadnessX When the separation between groups of individuals differences so great that they can not reproduce with each other, we say that the separate groups of individuals through the process of speciation are gradually becoming new species.
.....Theoretically, reproductive barriers arise when geographically separated populations diverge genetically. But Coyne describes five "cases of real-time speciation" that involve a different mechanism: chromosome doubling, or "polyploidy."
@ExtremeMadnessX 43 This usually follows hybridization between two existing plant species. Most hybrids are sterile because their mismatched chromosomes can't separate properly to produce fertile pollen and ovaries; occasionally,however, the chromosomes in a hybrid spontaneously double, producing two perfectly matched sets and making reproduction possible. The result is a fertile plant that is reproductively isolated from the two parents -- a new species, according to the BSC.
@ExtremeMadnessX 43 This usually follows hybridization between two existing plant species. Most hybrids are sterile because their mismatched chromosomes can't separate properly to produce fertile pollen and ovaries; occasionally,however, the chromosomes in a hybrid spontaneously double, producing two perfectly matched sets and making reproduction possible. The result is a fertile plant that is reproductively isolated from the two parents -- a new species, according to the BSC.
@ExtremeMadnessX But speciation by polyploidy ("secondary speciation") has been observed only in plants. It does not provide evidence for Darwin's theory that species originate through natural selection, nor for the neo-Darwinian theory of speciation by geographic separation and genetic divergence. Indeed, according to evolutionary biologist Douglas J. Futuyma....
@giska1000 only in plants huh? Ever heard of the ring species of salamanders in california? That's speciation which is NOT in plants. what now homeboy?
@ExtremeMadnessX ... polyploidy "does not confer major new morphological characteristics... [and] does not cause the evolution of new genera" or higher levels in the biological hierarchy.
So secondary speciation does not solve Darwin's problem. Only primary speciation -- the splitting of one species into two by natural selection --
@giska1000 Polyploidy answers the question of where "new genetic information" can come from. You wanted new information, Polyploidy is one of those way.
@ExtremeMadnessX -- would be capable of producing the branching-tree pattern of Darwinian evolution. But no one has ever observed primary speciation. Evolution's smoking gun has never been found
Or has it?
In Why Evolution Is True, Coyne claims that primary speciation was observed in an experiment reported in 1998. Curiously, Coyne did not mention it in the 2004 book he co-authored with Orr, but his 2009 account of it is worth quoting in full:
@chattiestspike2 ahahah cmon chattiestspike...ring species of salamanders come to mind....well of course they will....you dont have anything else beside this....but...lets not forget that this is not proof for evolution less than it is proof for ID...:))
We have degree regarding complexity. Viruses are wildly mutational. However, that is not true of more complex species.
@chattiestspike2 ...The more complex the species, the more static the genome. Things we learn, about the genetic variability of viruses in reality aren't valid for more complex species. The empirical evidence speaks for itself.
Ring species are easy to explain explain via ID using a substitution model.
DNA replication, for biological inheritance, is a process occurring in all living organisms to copy their DNA. This process is "replication" ....
@chattiestspike2 ..in that each strand of the original double-stranded DNA molecule serves as a template for the reproduction of the complementary strand. Hence, following DNA replication, two identical DNA molecules have been produced from a single double-stranded DNA molecule. Cellular proofreading and error toe-checking mechanisms ensure near perfect fidelity for DNA replication. If DNA replication gets out sync, it can prevent two species from reproducing.
@chattiestspike2 In phylogenetics, matching DNA sequences is often accomplished by firstly obtaining a nucleotide or protein sequence alignment, and then taking the bases or amino acids at corresponding positions in the alignment as the characters. While A, T, C, and G represent a particular nucleotide at a position, there are also letters that represent ambiguity.
@chattiestspike2 Of all the molecules sampled, there is more than one kind of nucleotide at that position. Sequences achieved by this might look like AGCGGAGCTTA and GCCGTAGACGC.
Assuming AGCGGAGCTTA is a DNA code necessary for reproduction (the complete substitution model would be much longer). If environmental adaptation has impacted the species at the DNA level and the DNA sequence AGCGGAGCTTA....
@chattiestspike2 ...has mutated to ATCGGAACTTA, making the Ensatina escholtzii incapable of interbreeding with its common ancestor at the other end of the ring (genetically unidentical), the mutation for all practical purposes was destructive as macroevolution never progresses beyond this point. It would evidently take an intelligent designer to complete the process.
Basically, we are still looking for an adequate demonstration of evolution in terms of being able to produce ....
@chattiestspike2 ...some sort of novel complex phenotype structure with function based on changes at the cellular level (genetic or epigenetic) from simpler lifeforms. Any test would have to show that the genetic structure wasn't the result of a minor genetic mutation. There are several challenges of degree regarding complexity.
We have degree regarding adaptation. Creationists also expect species to adapt to their environments just as evolutionists do.
@chattiestspike2 Are there limits to the degree of adaptation? Is the salamander going to develop new structures based on complex cellular changes so that we will no longer recognize it as a salamander (showing progressive complexity)? Or is this example of a ring species the limit of adaptation and genetic drift? If you answer the questions you will have no empirical evidence.
@chattiestspike2 The theory of common ancestry has to show a mechanism to derive complexity from simpler organisms. Vertebrates are extraordinarily complex at all levels of organization. How did they achieve this? What are the cellular mechanisms?
(i hope that you ll actually use...,,beneficial mutations,, and natural selection(but wait you dont have anything else beside that LOL) and then...i ll easily destroy your arguments) ...so???
@gregrutz ahahaha gregrutz you kidding me??first of all....its like asking YOU to prove that God doesent exist....are you normal??no one cant ,,disprove,, evolution because even if you find tomorrow t-rex and head of modern man in its mouth..you still wont ,,disprove,, evolution because it just cannot be rejected by materialists,naturalists and of course...atheists....even if its disproven long ago by REAL SCIENCE...(including natural selection as driving force,survival of the fittest and .....
@giska1000 Evolution is easy to prove wrong. Find a bunny fossil with the dinosaur fossils. Find a dinosaur fossil with the Cambrian marine animals. Find a bird with mammal DNA. Find a human fossil with the dinosaurs, not some fake footprints.
Atheists?!? Most Biologists accept God, all of them accept Evolution.
@gregrutz ....random mutation)...all of these are proven to be wrong....speedy toads-cane toads are among best known organisms that disproved n.selection as driving force...e.coli one of the best microorganisms that proved ,,survival of the fittest,, just like flavobacterium and other organisms...so now you have survival of the slowest,kindest...survival of the less fit...blablabla...and i wont even mention RANDOM MUTATION...that is...BAD...every mutation is harmful and very few of them are ....
@giska1000 It is funny how Darwin showed how evolution works with out even knowing about DNA or mutations. DNA is one of the best proofs FOR Evolution. The markers on DNA would not be the way they are unless evolution was true.
@gregrutz ...neutral ...and we say neutral ONLY because they dont cause such harm as these ,,harmful ones,, ..:))) you dont even have mutation that can cause increase of DNA information and complexity...John Sanford..leading geneticist,former darwinist and atheist now christian and YEC disproved primary axiom and everything from his book from 2005 about DNA entropy and declining genome is alredy confirmed even by mainstream scientific community 4.5 days ago if you want article i ll give it to yu
@gregrutz ahahahaha kid..like i said,you,dhorpatan and thesciencefoundation are on my ignore list...ntil you finish elementary school and then go to h.school and maybe even try to go to colleg...i wont speak with you kid...:))) so please dont reply to me :))) btw every comment you posted here is 100% of pure nonsense and ignorance....just typically.... you...:)))
@giska1000 Wow bro.. I don't want to sound arrogant or anything. But you are not texting to your best friend here. You write like a 12 years old teenager texting. And you make much less sense than a 12 years old would.
You should not be talking about "nonsense" nor "ignorance" except about your own.
@Filiforme umm ignirant child,i know about that crap you dumb ass americans like to bring out about ,,bad english,,...but i dont understand how low can some nation be,you all forget to check out channel,and see if someone is from english speaking country or not...i am fortunately from EUROPE,my languages are greek,serbian,german,swedish and italian...these are alnguages we use here,we dont use english,so my english is bad because im only using it here on you tube little dumb ass ;)...just sayin
@chattiestspike2 whaT??Its a fact,dont tell me you didnt knew that america is country with dumbest people in world?Matter fo fact,you all have even books released about stupidity of americans,you know about that last survey where over 70% of americans didnt knew how much would it take for earth to revolve around sun one time???I mean,really,check out,your education really is FAR BEHIND our european system of education....:) i am not arrogant,its truth..i am just annoyed by your own arrogance...
@giska1000 The reason I say that is because you come across as if you seriously think you are BETTER than us. Do you think that? Do you think you are better than Americans?
@chattiestspike2 what??Of course i am,we are better than americans,remember you are mix of trash and prisoners we sent in ,,new world,, when our jails were preocupied...dont get me wrong,but...you know that you americans are mongrels or immigrants...you are all intermixed little koktel of who knows how many nations and races...and..you all,at least caucasians of course,came from our balls...europe is superior to every other continent,its known fact...from every single aspect....now...
@chattiestspike2 ..you can say i am nazi,i am hateful persoin etc..but no i am not..i just speak the facts...without EU there is no america,nor any other civilised,well mannered country with technology and economic power...not to mention education...oh..and...if you think that we are not superior,and if you think that our system is not superior..then i challenge ysou to come to live in europe...if you at least become a buss driver...with all your education and ,,knowledge,, here in our system...
@chattiestspike2 ..you are not from any royal pure blooded european family..so of course we are here superior than you are there...and one question?WTF is wrong with you rhair?I mean,man you are a man..not a woman,cut that hair,or make some nice hairstyle you loook like marge simpson with that hair....
@chattiestspike2 ..and your conceit,even if we all know how dumb you americans are....trust me,there is an old saying here ,,What is shame for wise man,fool finds pride in it,, ....so you all coming here and attack everyone who disagrees with you,and ONLY ARGUMENT AGAISNT ME was always ,,ahh you are some kid,because your grammar sucks,,...etc...i mean,how dumb can someone be to say my grammar suchs,without even checking my channel,and where am from?Maybe because you are all so dumb and think...
@chattiestspike2 ..that america is only country in the world....i definitely think its that...:D <ou all americans think that north america is WHOLE WORLD,and nothing else exsist,and english is only language in th eworld...right?:)So i wont speak with dumb asses who accuse me for my grammar anymore,until they learn german,greek,serbian,sweddish or finland language...at least...so i can judge their grammar then..:) bye bye...
@giska1000 Wow... you have got to be one of the most judgmental pricks I've come across on youtube. But see, the difference between us is that I'm not going to judge Europe off of someone like you. I'm not going to say that ALL Europeans are arrogant prideful assholes just because of someone like you. You clearly don't know a lot about America and you probably think that there isn't a dumb demographic in your "greatest and most beautiful place on earth." I think YOU are a prick. End of story.
@chattiestspike2 ...then you are legend.....ok?Btw when you said i am prick,you know very well these are facts..i am royal blood,from well educated family of scientists,i am pure european,and you are mongrel,which is sad,because look at america today...when you did this what you did..intermixed with all kinds of races and immigrants..you alredy went in 3 fucking motherholes ..look at your economy,education,health care,percentage of unemployed..etc...and whats even worse..kenbyan muslim runs ...
@chattiestspike2 ..your country...:)...i mean...should i meantion places like deotrit?and so many other places full of crimes,gangs,crackheads,low lifes...uneducated fools...lunatics...i mean...tell me chattie..how many languages for example you know??
@chattiestspike2 what?Ok,if you have some argument against what i just said..then say it...compare Europe with usa man...are you serious...we are far superior than any other continent...just compare everything...everything what you want..compare our influence,and the fact that you all came from our balls(balls of our scum-criminals,prostitutes,and people who lived ,,on the other side of the law,,) and then we sent you there,and your founders were...trashj of europe....you know it...
@chattiestspike2 if by ,,social misfit,, you mean they hang out,and they want to hang out only with other europeans...then yes...we want to hang out with other europeans...greek,serbian,spanish,german,swiss,sweddish,italian,polish,czech,russian...etc...we all want to hang out with each other,wuropeans wit europeans..if you think this is ,,socially misfit,, then yes..we are socially misfit ....and look what happens with ,,socially fit,, people like yourself...:)
@Filiforme hey little filthy worm,talk to me when you learn one of these languages i mentioned,since you dont like my english grammar..(oh and dont just tell me that english is only language you know,because according to our EU constitution here,if you dont know at least 2 different languages beside your mother language,you are half iliterate) :)....
@giska1000 Stop making stupid and hateful generalizations..... Nobody is interested in your misplaced sense of superiority.... go do something useful with your life.
@SIC66SIC66 while im alredy doing it,you are just another low life american,its sad,because ....i wish to see you here in europe..you would be useful to clean bathrooms,wash windows,or something like that...but i dont believe that you even have enough education even for jobs like this...(yes,here in europe,without at least diploma,and knowing at least 3 different languages you cannot even wash windows,or bathrooms,or drive buss...etc..:) come and see)..
@gregrutz EVERY CHANGE IN DNA INCREASED THE INFORMATION !
...see what i mean...the rest i wont even comment,especially comment about nylonase in which evolution newer happened at all but flavobacterium just deactivted previous DNA genome info. while activating nylon eating enzyme....now...flavobacterium gained new fnction....eating nylon....but it loss previous information and it cannot live under normal circumstances now i.e ,,pay the price,, ...this is microvoltion....i.e vriation :))))
@gregrutz ...and if you think that this is evolution observed...then you also can say that mediterranean european parent with black hair and black eyes gave birth to another mediterranean european with black hair and blue eyes is alredy ,,evolution,, observed....:))) so you evolved from black haired black eyed european to black haired blue eyed european...again...you gained blue eys,but its because mutation in the 86th intron of the HERC2 gene reduced expression of OCA2 .....
@gregrutz ....with subsequent reduction in melanin production.... which again means...you LOST to ,,gain,, something...same goes with ,,antibiotic resistnce,, ...HIV immunity and every other ,,beneficial,, mutation...:)) you lose some information and become neutral to certain things,, but even tho if its positive(to be neutrl at certain diseases) you still will suffer consequences of losing information (which gave you ,,resistance,, to something) :D ...rest i wnt even comment....-.-
@gregrutz oh and btw...gregrutz..stop being ridiculous...you know very well that salamanders are still same kind of animal with certain divergence of genome....KIND is much better term than ,,specie,, because specie has 25 different definitions and none of them satisfys criteria to be fully accepted as any biologist will say to you :)))....
@giska1000 Same KIND? Yes! Dogs make dogs. Apes make apes. That is why humans are still apes. And all apes are still monkeys. And all monkeys are still primates. And all primates are still mammals. And all mammals are still tetrapods. And all tetrapods are still vertebrates. You can't outgrow you ancestry.
@chattiestspike2 A whole sequence of mutations would have to be identified and determined along these lines. You can apply any and all scientific methods to this salamander outside its natural habitat and it will still remain a salamander. Species are static and they stay that way.
...chattie i know that you know that ring species ....its not proof for evolution...cmon..we talk about salamanders here...and btw believe it or not this is proof for IDrs and creatrion (better known term KINDS)....
@chattiestspike2 ..if you want i ll explain it to you...but anyway...i want to hear from YOU do you thinkl that there are ,,beneficial,, mutations and if there are...can natural selection actually work ...ok????(btw i hope that you are in touch with latest scientific research,and if you are you prolly heard of the fact that natural selection as driving force is disproved ...especially by speedy toads-cane toads) ...not to mention ,,survival of the fittest,, ...but we ll get to that subject...:)
@ExtremeMadnessX We can even see the origin of a new, ecologically diverse bacterial species, all within a single laboratory flask. Paul Rainey and his colleagues at Oxford University placed a strain of the bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens in a small vessel containing nutrient broth, and simply watched it. (It's surprising but true that such a vessel actually contains diverse environments. Oxygen concentration, for example, is highest on the top and lowest on the bottom.)
@ExtremeMadnessX Within ten days--no more than a few hundred generations--the ancestral free-floating 'smooth' bacterium had evolved into two additional forms occupying different parts of the beaker.
One, called 'wrinkly spreader,' formed a mat on top of the broth. The other, called 'fuzzy spreader,' formed a carpet on the bottom. The smooth ancestral type persisted in the liquid environment in the middle. Each of the two new forms was genetically different from the ancestor...
@ExtremeMadnessX ...having evolved through mutation and natural selection to reproduce best in their respective environments. Here, then, is not only evolution but speciation occurring in the lab: the ancestral form produced, and coexisted with, two ecologically different descendants, and in bacteria such forms are considered distinct species. Over a very short time, natural selection in Pseudomonas yielded a small-scale 'adaptive radiation,' ....
@ExtremeMadnessX ...the equivalent of how animals or plants form species when they encounter new environments on an oceanic island.
But Coyne omits the fact that when the ecologically different forms were placed back into the same environment, they "suffered a rapid loss of diversity," according to Rainey. In bacteria, an ecologically distinct population (called an "ecotype") may constitute a separate species, but only if the distinction is permanent.
@ExtremeMadnessX As evolutionary microbiologist Frederick Cohan wrote in 2002, species in bacteria "are ecologically distinct from one another; and they are irreversibly separate."47 The rapid reversal of ecological distinctions when the bacterial populations in Rainey's experiment were put back into the same environment refutes Coyne's claim that the experiment demonstrated the origin of a new species.
Exaggerating the evidence to prop up Darwinism is not new. In the Galapagos finches...
@ExtremeMadnessX ...average beak depth reverted to normal after the drought ended. There was no net evolution, much less speciation. Yet Coyne writes in Why Evolution Is True that "everything we require of evolution by natural selection was amply documented" by the finch studies. Since scientific theories stand or fall on the evidence, Coyne's tendency to exaggerate the evidence does not speak well for the theory he is defending....
@ExtremeMadnessX ...When a 1999 booklet published by The U. S. National Academy of Sciences called the change in finch beaks "a particularly compelling example of speciation," Berkeley law professor and Darwin critic Phillip E. Johnson wrote in The Wall Street Journal: "When our leading scientists have to resort to the sort of distortion that would land a stock promoter in jail, you know they are in trouble.
@giska1000 you say Americans came from your balls but, technically, we ALL came from monkey balls sooo......
poop631 3 weeks ago
Oh Chattiespike.....I never say Lol in comments cuz I never Lol but ....for this video.....Lol
ProofPleez 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS ADMITS TO INTELLIGENT DESIGN?
SEARCH: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
VIEW: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
WATCH: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
KNOW: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
SHARE: Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design.
Dawkins: Civilisation with high level of technology from elsewhere in universe seeded self replicating molecules on this planet?
mat2112moneychangers 2 months ago
I think you have to add the satire warning because fundamentalist religious people who are on a crusade from god, are one of the few groups that defy any attempt at satire.
For the longest time I thought Edward Current was serious, and he's more sane then some of the people he mocks.
Craigmw45 6 months ago
This was hilarious. Although, I'm not quite sure why you needed to addendum the satire part, if any one thought it wasn't, well...that's just silly.
JSTStorm 6 months ago
@JSTStorm lots of atheists thought this was actually a creationist video. unfortunately, it was necessary for me to say that lol
chattiestspike2 6 months ago
Don't use communism an example unless you know the difference between Socialism and Communism.
Graw2314 6 months ago
@Graw2314 Don't act like a smug twat if you don't know the difference between satire and retards.
ChocoboKillerKanyo 6 months ago
@Graw2314 everything in that video with exception of rectal rituals and cannibalism came from actual creationists. Tell them not to use communism.
chattiestspike2 6 months ago
Awesome video!
We should burn all these evilutionists on a cross! :D
ILIYYILI 7 months ago
I'm an evolutionary biologist, and there are several things in this video that are wrong. Very very wrong. Not everything evolves into humans you dumb cunt. How dare you make a video that would say such ignorant things. I do however, obviously agree that religion is utter nonsense, and some things in the video are correct. It's still a shit video.
zelstar20 7 months ago
@zelstar20 I think you're going to have to elaborate on your unsubstantiated claim. Because your comment makes no sense. Don't you read?
chattiestspike2 7 months ago 2
@zelstar20 That may be true but doesn't change the fact that evolution leads to gay marriage! THink about it! It makes perfect sense!
reafdaw01 6 months ago
@zelstar20 calm yourself, it's a parody.
dodgeysmith1 5 months ago
It's hard to be as ridiculous as the real religious stuff, but this is pretty hilarious. Couldn't stop chuckling. Wanted to do a face palm, but had to keep watching.
GreatG0dOm 7 months ago
@Adamillionaire123 Well, HE doesn't have an invisible friend. So who's the FUNNY guy here? You pawned yourself on so many levels with your post, it's not even funny...eh, what ever!
ronnystoehr 7 months ago
@Adamillionaire123 We came from perturbations and quantum fluctuations of space time. Remember it is A Crash Course of Evolution so nothing is a close approximation. This video and your belief in god is what are humorous. Stop believing in the Stone Age and Bronze Age philosophies that the majority of the world believes in.
ttopperr 7 months ago
An excellent bit of "Poe".
You had me going up until about 30 seconds from the end. I guess I should have read the description first.
deedubya286 7 months ago
@Adamillionaire123 you know it! Zeuss is the one true God brother.
groovyengineer 7 months ago
Ha, how many are giving a thumb’s up because they think its satire and how many are giving a thumbs up because they think this is real?
Usersname1983 7 months ago
@Adamillionaire123 I think this is damn past hilarious. You're just asserting that God is the truth.
chattiestspike2 7 months ago
This is some hilarious stuff. I just watched the Gravity crash course, and wasn't disappointed with either one. Do you take suggestions? If you don't, then you are a non-gravity-worshiping nazi! Either way, you did one in physics and now biology, how about something on light or maybe quantum... uh, QED or something. I mean really, do they expect us to believe that magic mumbo-jumbo they are doing?
CraniumOnEmpty 7 months ago
I'll agree to pornography, and Double RR…sometimes…when she's in the mood for it.
00D00 7 months ago 5
It's sad there is no distinction between videos like this and actual creationist videos. They live with an all or nothing mentality. Either you believe all the bullshit or you don't believe anything at all.
Miranox2 8 months ago
because we all know that EVOLUTION AND ATHEISM ARE THE SAME THING!
lol
Jacckkkkkkk 8 months ago
Comment removed
RosauraGlezRam 8 months ago
Comment removed
dimthelighta 8 months ago
@dimthelighta are you a lying whore from satan?
chattiestspike2 8 months ago
Comment removed
dimthelighta 8 months ago
@dimthelighta this is satire bromeister :D
chattiestspike2 8 months ago
Comment removed
dimthelighta 8 months ago
Yup, that is what they know, about 2 minutes of crap.
gregrutz 8 months ago
You know what is really sad? I was about 45 seconds in before I realized you were making fun of creationists.
I don't know if that means I am slow naturally, or if creationism presented in any form makes one's brain functions slow down.
jadedimp 8 months ago
@jadedimp It means I succeeded :D
chattiestspike2 8 months ago 6
@chattiestspike2 Oh man, right around "true story" my "not sure if srz face" borked. I found your channel through the Lapkine vids. Subbed..
LionidasL10 8 months ago
LOL your parody videos are so funny, especially the conspiracy one.
CircusOfBedlam 8 months ago
LOOL this was a good one XDD. Now, let's see how many creationist will go on ranting about it
rotcivzag 8 months ago
ohhhh you forget my fauvorits ... sadism and incest!
azulalivia 8 months ago
Some people really have no sense of humor and satire. This is obviously a parody of all the creationist "arguments"! And creationists are so totally stupid that they are unable to read any science book on astronomy and evolution, so just repeat what they heard from a creationist "experts"!
Wait a minute, what about crocoduck, and banana "argument"! ? ;-)
ExtremeMadnessX 8 months ago
Holy shit, this is brilliant. I...I think I love you.
OgreVI 8 months ago
@OgreVI lol thanks :D
chattiestspike2 8 months ago
Is there a "Love" button?
Venaloid 9 months ago
@Venaloid there is but it's not on youtube
chattiestspike2 9 months ago
So many fails... i'm sorry so many people refuse to see the truth. It's sad.
Geronamid 9 months ago
@Geronamid are you a lying whore from satan?
chattiestspike2 9 months ago
@chattiestspike2 I'm not sure i understand your question. I've seen enough of your videos to know what you stand for. And by the way... i'm still sorry that so many people use the type of ignorant argument you present in this video.
Geronamid 9 months ago
@Geronamid oh ok lol I thought you were saying I was the one failing. my apologies :D
btw I ask "ARE YOU A LYING WHORE FROM SATAN???" to all the people thinking those are my strawman argument. Just as a gag.
chattiestspike2 9 months ago
Great, now the creationists are going to point to this video as "proof of creationism"
mikedamat 9 months ago 3
Haha when your vid said 50 billion years... I checked description and saw "Satire"
Thumb up! :D
bulletmunchr 9 months ago
Yea you might want to point out at the beginning its sarcasm for the those apparently who can't read and/or are less then intelligent.
NetraAmorosi 9 months ago
I am ashamed i didnt find this channel till now
Thanks for the ROFLOLs
captaindisguise 9 months ago
Is there an anti-Poe horizon where any idiot can recognize the satire?
tctheunbeliever 9 months ago
AHHAHAHAAHA
Jacckkkkkkk 9 months ago
AMAZING at RR level xD
AmazedAtheist 9 months ago
lol ha
ThinkMinding 9 months ago
RR !!!
krissy4nik 9 months ago
what is evolution again? =D
girlpalooza 9 months ago
this is great! lmao
nick888ph 9 months ago
Nothing better than satire that is so good every other comment I read seems to think you are serious. Is there an actual gene for satire detection? Like it is a skill only about half of us have? I mean it has to be. There are just way too many people that can't grasp it on Youtube for it to be. What's more hilarious is the religious consider this stuff so ridiculous they think you owned yourself, yet they believe in Noah's Ark. Pro Tip: If it is ridiculous, don't just believe it is true.
Reip187 9 months ago
Where do I sign up to become a lying whore for satan?
DeathofSpeech 10 months ago
SO MUCH IGNORANCE
(in the uploader)
dougmoerhoffman 10 months ago
@dougmoerhoffman gasp!!!?!?!? Are you a lying whore from satan?
chattiestspike2 10 months ago
@chattiestspike2 not at all. what gives?
dougmoerhoffman 10 months ago
@dougmoerhoffman did you read the description??? GASP!!!
chattiestspike2 10 months ago
@chattiestspike2 Oh yes.
dougmoerhoffman 10 months ago
@chattiestspike2 in case you havent figured it out...have you figured out that only evolutionists and atheists misunderstood this video???no wonder why they are evolutionists(or atheists) ...just like you...
giska1000 9 months ago
@giska1000 that's incorrect in two ways. First off, most atheists and "evolutionists" understood that this was satire while a few of them thought I was a creationist strawmanning evolution. Second off, a few creationists thought I was a creationist as well.
chattiestspike2 9 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ummm..i can only see here dumb ass evolutionists and atheists that shows(beside lack of basic knowledge and education) also...lack of sense of humor....
giska1000 9 months ago
@giska1000 Look who's talking about the lack of basic knowledge and education. Also I think you're the one who has no sense of humor. Since you're probably creationist, when someone makes fun of your stupid statements you can clearly find yourself offended. Evolutionists have basic education and knowledge (as opposed to some fool) otherwise they would not be scientists in the first place.
ExtremeMadnessX 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ahah umm....kid....1.i am IDrs...and even if i was creationist so what?? 2.you are little noob..classic jobless you tube wannabe ,,scientist,, ...and 3. AH AHA HAHAH AAA HAAAAA....evolutionists have ,,basic knowledge,, and ,,thats why they are scientists,, ???ok....kid....dont you ever reply to me again you little ignorant piece of shit....ok?? :))) until you finish your kindergarten,then elementary school,and highschool...and after that at least try to get BSc...dont talk to me
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 Oh yes, intelligent design as not the same as creationism (because ID is a true "science" LOL). Yeah right! I did not even say that I am a scientist, I unlike you am not ignorant and total asshole who ignores scientific findings and discoveries. And evolution has long been proved, are constantly re-prove, experiments in laboratories and in nature and can be monitored in real time. At least I'm not in kindergarten, unlike you!People like you should be declared as mentally retarded!
ExtremeMadnessX 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX umm kid you are an extreme idiot....first of all...i am BSc and MSc in(biology,microbiology,biochemistry and genetics) and diploma owner in philosophy and history...so PLEASE dont talk to me about science little kid :))) ...and i can bet that you newer saw any scientific article in your life...you only saw some articles from talkorigins or physorg and sites like that...including wikipedia...LOL...-.- ...and this last segment of ,,evolution being proved,,...yeah...i dont need...
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ..to reply to you anymore..since you as an ignorant kid...dont even know what evolution means...not to mention if i ask you when is it proved or observed you wont even be able to show one example....:))) ehhhh...poor kids...
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 So smart guy explain what evolution means, and what have you heard about evolution. Here's the simplest examples with an animal that lives for example in the polar circle. Animal breeding dozen pups, of which several of which they have fur density as well as a mother, a few pups through mutation rarely got fur, and two cubs are born with an even denser fur.
ExtremeMadnessX 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX first dont teach me about evolution ok?i think that with BSc and MSc degrees in biology,microbiology,genetics and biochemistry i know what evolution is and what evolution means....but evolution...true evolution would be progress over time...(no its not change over time like you want to think)....so examples you gave are NOTHING more than variation within specie ....variation or minor change due to adaptation in certain environment is observable fact knows from the very first day
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 uh huh... I just read your comments about what you think is wrong with evolution. I must say, with a BSc and MSc in biology, microbiology, genetics and biochemistry, you sure are a complete idiot. An utter moron. Now I feel very confident in saying this because because based on what you just said, you don't have those degrees or at the very least don't deserve those degrees.
If you DO have those degrees, then you are just flat out being dishonest.
chattiestspike2 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 uh huh... I just read your comments about what you think is wrong with evolution. I must say, with a BSc and MSc in biology, microbiology, genetics and biochemistry, you sure are a complete idiot. An utter moron.
...ummm..well..first of all you dont have to go to personal insults and accusations when you dont know me dear friend..and 2nd..you better prepare some proof for every claim you making for evolution....i alredy know every argument ...well.. ,,aegument,, that comes...
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..from evolutionists....so dont worry...everything i say or claim is backed up by latest...very latestr scientific research....so everything i say here...you can ask me to give you articles or even videos(like for example video and article from Dr Craig Venter about ,,darwins tree of life,, and ,,common ancestor,, being OUTDATED MYTH AND one big ball of bullshit) ...
you don't have those degrees or at the very least don't deserve those degrees.
..i dont deserve them....really?
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ...why??maybe because i rejected absurd theory of evolution....oh and btw does John Sanford..world leading geneticist,inventor of gene gun and over 30 other patterns,an professor from Cornell University deserve his PhD ??because he was darwinist himself....now he is YEC...hmmm...is he dumb and he dont have PhD too???and xxxx other scientists and professors that reject theory of evolution???oh...and one good news...for me of course...:)) i ll send you article that from june 8th..
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..or 9th i think...in which GENETIC ENTROPY IS CONFIRMED...:))) just like John Sanford in his book in 2005 said....DNA declining .it cannot be older than...well...15 000 years at its best...according to John Sanford..:))))
see.. there you go. what the fuck definition of biological evolution are you playing with? Sounds like a creationist definition to me which conveniently fits sorta well with your thermodynamics crap.
...ummm...ahahaha..funny thing is..this is how ALL ...
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..professors,scientists and evolutionists without any degree here in europe say about evolution...PROGRESS over time....dont you say to me that now it became ,,change,, over time...OF COURSE THAT EVERYONE KNOWS THAT EVERYTHING CHANGES over time..dont be fool....but evolution plays with progress....dont you say to me that bactaria just ,,changed,, into 1.6 to 1.8 million KNOWN species in the world today..:))) it had to PROGRESS...
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 "true evolution would be progress over time...(no its not change over time like you want to think)"
see.. there you go. what the fuck definition of biological evolution are you playing with? Sounds like a creationist definition to me which conveniently fits sorta well with your thermodynamics crap. No it's not "progress," it IS changes over time. These changes are often beneficial. Progress means there's an end goal. There's no end goal with evolution.
chattiestspike2 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 No it's not "progress," it IS changes over time. These changes are often beneficial. Progress means there's an end goal. There's no end goal with evolution.ž
..ahaha...funny thing is..this is not DARWINIAN theory of evolution...but whatever...i will concentrate on this BENEFICIAL thing...name me any ,,beneficial,, mutation or ,,change,, can you??(btw i alredy know what you ll say but just for the sake of formality) :))) cmon lets go....??
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 I'll give you a tip- next time you want to claim to have all that credibility to up the chances that people will believe what you say just because YOU say it.. well.. don't. That's not how the world works. Maybe that's how YOU work and you're just following other creationists' footsteps.
Say that you're a student of biology so at least you can say you are still learning. You will at least have an excuse why you would be saying such stupid things.
chattiestspike2 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ...of mans life....but to believe that one specie ..or kind...can transform into another more complex kind is absurd..its science fiction ....every change you see amongst species happens withing DNA...loss of recombination,or sometimes in duplication of DNA genome...it newer progress and increases...because DNA works only with available information and of course as before 3 days DNA genetic entropy is CONFIRMED just as John Sanford in his 2005th book alredy explained....we know
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ..today that DNA just like EVERYTHING ELSE obeys 2nd law of thermodyns. and it declining..and it DECLINED eversince it came inot existence....btw specie...hmmm..what do you mean by spoecie???
Coyne and H. Allen Orr published a detailed book titled Speciation, in which they noted that biologists have not been able to agree on a definition of "species" because no single definition fits every case.
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX For example, a definition applicable to living, sexually reproducing organisms might make no sense when applied to fossils or bacteria. In fact, there are more than 25 definitions of "species." What definition is best?
..hhmmm..??we dont even know what specie is...because we have now over 25 different definition of what specie is but none of them fulfills criteria to be accepted as true...:))) so kid..how can you talk about ,,new specie,, when you dont even know what it means?
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 You really have too much free time, all these examples that you mentioned, scientists have long discussed. Evolution does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because it is not a closed system, life uses an external power source (the Sun) is transmitted through the food chain that begins with photosynthesis in plants.
ExtremeMadnessX 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX Evolution does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because it is not a closed system
...first of all...it is WITHIN closed system...the universe...2nd
It is commonly argued that the spectacular increase in order which has occurred on Earth does not violate the second law of thermodynamics because the Earth is an open system, and anything can happen in an open system as long as the entropy increases outside the system compensate...
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ...the entropy decreases inside the system. However, if we define "X-entropy" to be the entropy associated with any diffusing component X (for example, X might be heat), and, since entropy measures disorder, "X-order" to be the negative of X-entropy, a closer look at the equations for entropy change shows that they not only say that the X-order cannot increase in a closed system, but that they also say that in an open system the X-order...
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ...cannot increase faster than it is imported through the boundary. Thus the equations for entropy change do not support the illogical "compensation" idea; instead, they illustrate the tautology that "if an increase in order is extremely improbable when a system is closed, it is still extremely improbable when the system is open, unless something is entering which makes it not extremely improbable".....
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ...Thus, unless we are willing to argue that the influx of solar energy into the Earth makes the appearance of spaceships, computers and the Internet not extremely improbable, we have to conclude that the second law has in fact been violated here.
so my friend...if you think that by ,,adding energy,, (without something to control and utilize it) you can overcome 2nd law of thermodyns. and somehow survive amount of Sun heat and UV lights....you are more than foolish.....
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 And when we have the definition of species here is one example from my old biology textbooks from elementary school: The very nature are constantly occurring changes which affect the living world. If a separate long-term small groups of individuals of certain species due to unequal processes (mutation, selection and other factors) that occur between individuals at different venues groups are increasingly differ.
ExtremeMadnessX 8 months ago
@giska1000 When the separation between groups of individuals differences so great that they can not reproduce with each other, we say that the separate groups of individuals through the process of speciation are gradually becoming new species.
ExtremeMadnessX 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX When the separation between groups of individuals differences so great that they can not reproduce with each other, we say that the separate groups of individuals through the process of speciation are gradually becoming new species.
.....Theoretically, reproductive barriers arise when geographically separated populations diverge genetically. But Coyne describes five "cases of real-time speciation" that involve a different mechanism: chromosome doubling, or "polyploidy."
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX 43 This usually follows hybridization between two existing plant species. Most hybrids are sterile because their mismatched chromosomes can't separate properly to produce fertile pollen and ovaries; occasionally,however, the chromosomes in a hybrid spontaneously double, producing two perfectly matched sets and making reproduction possible. The result is a fertile plant that is reproductively isolated from the two parents -- a new species, according to the BSC.
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX 43 This usually follows hybridization between two existing plant species. Most hybrids are sterile because their mismatched chromosomes can't separate properly to produce fertile pollen and ovaries; occasionally,however, the chromosomes in a hybrid spontaneously double, producing two perfectly matched sets and making reproduction possible. The result is a fertile plant that is reproductively isolated from the two parents -- a new species, according to the BSC.
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX But speciation by polyploidy ("secondary speciation") has been observed only in plants. It does not provide evidence for Darwin's theory that species originate through natural selection, nor for the neo-Darwinian theory of speciation by geographic separation and genetic divergence. Indeed, according to evolutionary biologist Douglas J. Futuyma....
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 only in plants huh? Ever heard of the ring species of salamanders in california? That's speciation which is NOT in plants. what now homeboy?
chattiestspike2 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ... polyploidy "does not confer major new morphological characteristics... [and] does not cause the evolution of new genera" or higher levels in the biological hierarchy.
So secondary speciation does not solve Darwin's problem. Only primary speciation -- the splitting of one species into two by natural selection --
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 Polyploidy answers the question of where "new genetic information" can come from. You wanted new information, Polyploidy is one of those way.
chattiestspike2 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX -- would be capable of producing the branching-tree pattern of Darwinian evolution. But no one has ever observed primary speciation. Evolution's smoking gun has never been found
Or has it?
In Why Evolution Is True, Coyne claims that primary speciation was observed in an experiment reported in 1998. Curiously, Coyne did not mention it in the 2004 book he co-authored with Orr, but his 2009 account of it is worth quoting in full:
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 Primary speciation has been observed. Ring species of salamanders in california come to mind.
chattiestspike2 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ahahah cmon chattiestspike...ring species of salamanders come to mind....well of course they will....you dont have anything else beside this....but...lets not forget that this is not proof for evolution less than it is proof for ID...:))
We have degree regarding complexity. Viruses are wildly mutational. However, that is not true of more complex species.
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ...The more complex the species, the more static the genome. Things we learn, about the genetic variability of viruses in reality aren't valid for more complex species. The empirical evidence speaks for itself.
Ring species are easy to explain explain via ID using a substitution model.
DNA replication, for biological inheritance, is a process occurring in all living organisms to copy their DNA. This process is "replication" ....
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..in that each strand of the original double-stranded DNA molecule serves as a template for the reproduction of the complementary strand. Hence, following DNA replication, two identical DNA molecules have been produced from a single double-stranded DNA molecule. Cellular proofreading and error toe-checking mechanisms ensure near perfect fidelity for DNA replication. If DNA replication gets out sync, it can prevent two species from reproducing.
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 In phylogenetics, matching DNA sequences is often accomplished by firstly obtaining a nucleotide or protein sequence alignment, and then taking the bases or amino acids at corresponding positions in the alignment as the characters. While A, T, C, and G represent a particular nucleotide at a position, there are also letters that represent ambiguity.
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 Of all the molecules sampled, there is more than one kind of nucleotide at that position. Sequences achieved by this might look like AGCGGAGCTTA and GCCGTAGACGC.
Assuming AGCGGAGCTTA is a DNA code necessary for reproduction (the complete substitution model would be much longer). If environmental adaptation has impacted the species at the DNA level and the DNA sequence AGCGGAGCTTA....
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ...has mutated to ATCGGAACTTA, making the Ensatina escholtzii incapable of interbreeding with its common ancestor at the other end of the ring (genetically unidentical), the mutation for all practical purposes was destructive as macroevolution never progresses beyond this point. It would evidently take an intelligent designer to complete the process.
Basically, we are still looking for an adequate demonstration of evolution in terms of being able to produce ....
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ...some sort of novel complex phenotype structure with function based on changes at the cellular level (genetic or epigenetic) from simpler lifeforms. Any test would have to show that the genetic structure wasn't the result of a minor genetic mutation. There are several challenges of degree regarding complexity.
We have degree regarding adaptation. Creationists also expect species to adapt to their environments just as evolutionists do.
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 Are there limits to the degree of adaptation? Is the salamander going to develop new structures based on complex cellular changes so that we will no longer recognize it as a salamander (showing progressive complexity)? Or is this example of a ring species the limit of adaptation and genetic drift? If you answer the questions you will have no empirical evidence.
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 No a salamander it going to evolve into new species. You know, Origin of Species.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 The theory of common ancestry has to show a mechanism to derive complexity from simpler organisms. Vertebrates are extraordinarily complex at all levels of organization. How did they achieve this? What are the cellular mechanisms?
(i hope that you ll actually use...,,beneficial mutations,, and natural selection(but wait you dont have anything else beside that LOL) and then...i ll easily destroy your arguments) ...so???
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 Darwin did show the mechanism for evolution, and he didn't even know about DNA. Let us know when you write a paper proving evolutin wrong.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz ahahaha gregrutz you kidding me??first of all....its like asking YOU to prove that God doesent exist....are you normal??no one cant ,,disprove,, evolution because even if you find tomorrow t-rex and head of modern man in its mouth..you still wont ,,disprove,, evolution because it just cannot be rejected by materialists,naturalists and of course...atheists....even if its disproven long ago by REAL SCIENCE...(including natural selection as driving force,survival of the fittest and .....
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 Evolution is easy to prove wrong. Find a bunny fossil with the dinosaur fossils. Find a dinosaur fossil with the Cambrian marine animals. Find a bird with mammal DNA. Find a human fossil with the dinosaurs, not some fake footprints.
Atheists?!? Most Biologists accept God, all of them accept Evolution.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz ....random mutation)...all of these are proven to be wrong....speedy toads-cane toads are among best known organisms that disproved n.selection as driving force...e.coli one of the best microorganisms that proved ,,survival of the fittest,, just like flavobacterium and other organisms...so now you have survival of the slowest,kindest...survival of the less fit...blablabla...and i wont even mention RANDOM MUTATION...that is...BAD...every mutation is harmful and very few of them are ....
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 It is funny how Darwin showed how evolution works with out even knowing about DNA or mutations. DNA is one of the best proofs FOR Evolution. The markers on DNA would not be the way they are unless evolution was true.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz ...neutral ...and we say neutral ONLY because they dont cause such harm as these ,,harmful ones,, ..:))) you dont even have mutation that can cause increase of DNA information and complexity...John Sanford..leading geneticist,former darwinist and atheist now christian and YEC disproved primary axiom and everything from his book from 2005 about DNA entropy and declining genome is alredy confirmed even by mainstream scientific community 4.5 days ago if you want article i ll give it to yu
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 Bull Shit. Entropy has nothing to do with DNA or evolution.
Any change in the DNA is ''new information''
The earth is millions of years old, Geologists proved that 200 years ago.
And there never was a global flood.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz ahahahaha kid..like i said,you,dhorpatan and thesciencefoundation are on my ignore list...ntil you finish elementary school and then go to h.school and maybe even try to go to colleg...i wont speak with you kid...:))) so please dont reply to me :))) btw every comment you posted here is 100% of pure nonsense and ignorance....just typically.... you...:)))
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 I studied Science in college, you must be home schooled.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@giska1000 Wow bro.. I don't want to sound arrogant or anything. But you are not texting to your best friend here. You write like a 12 years old teenager texting. And you make much less sense than a 12 years old would.
You should not be talking about "nonsense" nor "ignorance" except about your own.
Just sayin'
Filiforme 7 months ago
@Filiforme umm ignirant child,i know about that crap you dumb ass americans like to bring out about ,,bad english,,...but i dont understand how low can some nation be,you all forget to check out channel,and see if someone is from english speaking country or not...i am fortunately from EUROPE,my languages are greek,serbian,german,swedish and italian...these are alnguages we use here,we dont use english,so my english is bad because im only using it here on you tube little dumb ass ;)...just sayin
giska1000 7 months ago
@giska1000 ",i know about that crap you dumb ass americans like to bring out about ..... .i am fortunately from EUROPE"
Any idea how much of a disrespectful dick you sound like when you say things like that?
chattiestspike2 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 whaT??Its a fact,dont tell me you didnt knew that america is country with dumbest people in world?Matter fo fact,you all have even books released about stupidity of americans,you know about that last survey where over 70% of americans didnt knew how much would it take for earth to revolve around sun one time???I mean,really,check out,your education really is FAR BEHIND our european system of education....:) i am not arrogant,its truth..i am just annoyed by your own arrogance...
giska1000 7 months ago
@giska1000 The reason I say that is because you come across as if you seriously think you are BETTER than us. Do you think that? Do you think you are better than Americans?
chattiestspike2 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 what??Of course i am,we are better than americans,remember you are mix of trash and prisoners we sent in ,,new world,, when our jails were preocupied...dont get me wrong,but...you know that you americans are mongrels or immigrants...you are all intermixed little koktel of who knows how many nations and races...and..you all,at least caucasians of course,came from our balls...europe is superior to every other continent,its known fact...from every single aspect....now...
giska1000 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..you can say i am nazi,i am hateful persoin etc..but no i am not..i just speak the facts...without EU there is no america,nor any other civilised,well mannered country with technology and economic power...not to mention education...oh..and...if you think that we are not superior,and if you think that our system is not superior..then i challenge ysou to come to live in europe...if you at least become a buss driver...with all your education and ,,knowledge,, here in our system...
giska1000 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..you are not from any royal pure blooded european family..so of course we are here superior than you are there...and one question?WTF is wrong with you rhair?I mean,man you are a man..not a woman,cut that hair,or make some nice hairstyle you loook like marge simpson with that hair....
giska1000 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..and your conceit,even if we all know how dumb you americans are....trust me,there is an old saying here ,,What is shame for wise man,fool finds pride in it,, ....so you all coming here and attack everyone who disagrees with you,and ONLY ARGUMENT AGAISNT ME was always ,,ahh you are some kid,because your grammar sucks,,...etc...i mean,how dumb can someone be to say my grammar suchs,without even checking my channel,and where am from?Maybe because you are all so dumb and think...
giska1000 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..that america is only country in the world....i definitely think its that...:D <ou all americans think that north america is WHOLE WORLD,and nothing else exsist,and english is only language in th eworld...right?:)So i wont speak with dumb asses who accuse me for my grammar anymore,until they learn german,greek,serbian,sweddish or finland language...at least...so i can judge their grammar then..:) bye bye...
giska1000 7 months ago
@giska1000 Wow... you have got to be one of the most judgmental pricks I've come across on youtube. But see, the difference between us is that I'm not going to judge Europe off of someone like you. I'm not going to say that ALL Europeans are arrogant prideful assholes just because of someone like you. You clearly don't know a lot about America and you probably think that there isn't a dumb demographic in your "greatest and most beautiful place on earth." I think YOU are a prick. End of story.
chattiestspike2 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ...then you are legend.....ok?Btw when you said i am prick,you know very well these are facts..i am royal blood,from well educated family of scientists,i am pure european,and you are mongrel,which is sad,because look at america today...when you did this what you did..intermixed with all kinds of races and immigrants..you alredy went in 3 fucking motherholes ..look at your economy,education,health care,percentage of unemployed..etc...and whats even worse..kenbyan muslim runs ...
giska1000 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..your country...:)...i mean...should i meantion places like deotrit?and so many other places full of crimes,gangs,crackheads,low lifes...uneducated fools...lunatics...i mean...tell me chattie..how many languages for example you know??
giska1000 7 months ago
@giska1000 ... are you for real?
chattiestspike2 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 what?Ok,if you have some argument against what i just said..then say it...compare Europe with usa man...are you serious...we are far superior than any other continent...just compare everything...everything what you want..compare our influence,and the fact that you all came from our balls(balls of our scum-criminals,prostitutes,and people who lived ,,on the other side of the law,,) and then we sent you there,and your founders were...trashj of europe....you know it...
giska1000 7 months ago
@giska1000 lol are all "royal blood" people as socially misfit as you?
chattiestspike2 7 months ago
@chattiestspike2 if by ,,social misfit,, you mean they hang out,and they want to hang out only with other europeans...then yes...we want to hang out with other europeans...greek,serbian,spanish,german,swiss,sweddish,italian,polish,czech,russian...etc...we all want to hang out with each other,wuropeans wit europeans..if you think this is ,,socially misfit,, then yes..we are socially misfit ....and look what happens with ,,socially fit,, people like yourself...:)
giska1000 7 months ago
@giska1000 You're not helping your image by insulting others you know? You only make yourself look bad. Shall we just call it quits?
Filiforme 7 months ago
@Filiforme hey little filthy worm,talk to me when you learn one of these languages i mentioned,since you dont like my english grammar..(oh and dont just tell me that english is only language you know,because according to our EU constitution here,if you dont know at least 2 different languages beside your mother language,you are half iliterate) :)....
giska1000 7 months ago
@giska1000 Stop making stupid and hateful generalizations..... Nobody is interested in your misplaced sense of superiority.... go do something useful with your life.
SIC66SIC66 7 months ago
@SIC66SIC66 while im alredy doing it,you are just another low life american,its sad,because ....i wish to see you here in europe..you would be useful to clean bathrooms,wash windows,or something like that...but i dont believe that you even have enough education even for jobs like this...(yes,here in europe,without at least diploma,and knowing at least 3 different languages you cannot even wash windows,or bathrooms,or drive buss...etc..:) come and see)..
giska1000 7 months ago
@giska1000 If you weren't SO MASSIVLY ignorant you would have clicked on my name and saw I AM from Europe, I am from the Netherlands.
You just showed AGAIN how much of an idiot you are, please stop wasting your and our lives with this crap.. Or do you like looking like a fool?
SIC66SIC66 7 months ago
@giska1000 Oh I see you are a lost cause... Keep on with the hostile attitude, its gonna lead you to happiness.
Filiforme 7 months ago
@giska1000 ''you dont even have mutation that can cause increase of DNA information ''
EVERY CHANGE IN DNA INCREASED THE INFORMATION !
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz EVERY CHANGE IN DNA INCREASED THE INFORMATION !
...see what i mean...the rest i wont even comment,especially comment about nylonase in which evolution newer happened at all but flavobacterium just deactivted previous DNA genome info. while activating nylon eating enzyme....now...flavobacterium gained new fnction....eating nylon....but it loss previous information and it cannot live under normal circumstances now i.e ,,pay the price,, ...this is microvoltion....i.e vriation :))))
giska1000 8 months ago
@gregrutz ...and if you think that this is evolution observed...then you also can say that mediterranean european parent with black hair and black eyes gave birth to another mediterranean european with black hair and blue eyes is alredy ,,evolution,, observed....:))) so you evolved from black haired black eyed european to black haired blue eyed european...again...you gained blue eys,but its because mutation in the 86th intron of the HERC2 gene reduced expression of OCA2 .....
giska1000 8 months ago
@gregrutz ....with subsequent reduction in melanin production.... which again means...you LOST to ,,gain,, something...same goes with ,,antibiotic resistnce,, ...HIV immunity and every other ,,beneficial,, mutation...:)) you lose some information and become neutral to certain things,, but even tho if its positive(to be neutrl at certain diseases) you still will suffer consequences of losing information (which gave you ,,resistance,, to something) :D ...rest i wnt even comment....-.-
giska1000 8 months ago
@giska1000 Sorry, I was talking about Evolution. The process Darwin proved without even knowing what caused variation in Species.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@giska1000 DNA entorpy?!? Entorpy has to do with heat flow, not DNA.
The fossils record show animals and plants becoming more complex, I guess you are wrong.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@gregrutz oh and btw...gregrutz..stop being ridiculous...you know very well that salamanders are still same kind of animal with certain divergence of genome....KIND is much better term than ,,specie,, because specie has 25 different definitions and none of them satisfys criteria to be fully accepted as any biologist will say to you :)))....
giska1000 8 months ago
gregrutz 8 months ago
@giska1000 ''The theory of common ancestry has to show a mechanism to derive complexity from simpler organisms''
DARWIN DID THAT 150 YEARS AGO, TRY AND KEEP UP WITH SCIENCE.
gregrutz 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 A whole sequence of mutations would have to be identified and determined along these lines. You can apply any and all scientific methods to this salamander outside its natural habitat and it will still remain a salamander. Species are static and they stay that way.
...chattie i know that you know that ring species ....its not proof for evolution...cmon..we talk about salamanders here...and btw believe it or not this is proof for IDrs and creatrion (better known term KINDS)....
giska1000 8 months ago
@chattiestspike2 ..if you want i ll explain it to you...but anyway...i want to hear from YOU do you thinkl that there are ,,beneficial,, mutations and if there are...can natural selection actually work ...ok????(btw i hope that you are in touch with latest scientific research,and if you are you prolly heard of the fact that natural selection as driving force is disproved ...especially by speedy toads-cane toads) ...not to mention ,,survival of the fittest,, ...but we ll get to that subject...:)
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX We can even see the origin of a new, ecologically diverse bacterial species, all within a single laboratory flask. Paul Rainey and his colleagues at Oxford University placed a strain of the bacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens in a small vessel containing nutrient broth, and simply watched it. (It's surprising but true that such a vessel actually contains diverse environments. Oxygen concentration, for example, is highest on the top and lowest on the bottom.)
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX Within ten days--no more than a few hundred generations--the ancestral free-floating 'smooth' bacterium had evolved into two additional forms occupying different parts of the beaker.
One, called 'wrinkly spreader,' formed a mat on top of the broth. The other, called 'fuzzy spreader,' formed a carpet on the bottom. The smooth ancestral type persisted in the liquid environment in the middle. Each of the two new forms was genetically different from the ancestor...
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ...having evolved through mutation and natural selection to reproduce best in their respective environments. Here, then, is not only evolution but speciation occurring in the lab: the ancestral form produced, and coexisted with, two ecologically different descendants, and in bacteria such forms are considered distinct species. Over a very short time, natural selection in Pseudomonas yielded a small-scale 'adaptive radiation,' ....
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ...the equivalent of how animals or plants form species when they encounter new environments on an oceanic island.
But Coyne omits the fact that when the ecologically different forms were placed back into the same environment, they "suffered a rapid loss of diversity," according to Rainey. In bacteria, an ecologically distinct population (called an "ecotype") may constitute a separate species, but only if the distinction is permanent.
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX As evolutionary microbiologist Frederick Cohan wrote in 2002, species in bacteria "are ecologically distinct from one another; and they are irreversibly separate."47 The rapid reversal of ecological distinctions when the bacterial populations in Rainey's experiment were put back into the same environment refutes Coyne's claim that the experiment demonstrated the origin of a new species.
Exaggerating the evidence to prop up Darwinism is not new. In the Galapagos finches...
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ...average beak depth reverted to normal after the drought ended. There was no net evolution, much less speciation. Yet Coyne writes in Why Evolution Is True that "everything we require of evolution by natural selection was amply documented" by the finch studies. Since scientific theories stand or fall on the evidence, Coyne's tendency to exaggerate the evidence does not speak well for the theory he is defending....
giska1000 8 months ago
@ExtremeMadnessX ...When a 1999 booklet published by The U. S. National Academy of Sciences called the change in finch beaks "a particularly compelling example of speciation," Berkeley law professor and Darwin critic Phillip E. Johnson wrote in The Wall Street Journal: "When our leading scientists have to resort to the sort of distortion that would land a stock promoter in jail, you know they are in trouble.
giska1000 8 months ago