They left egypt after the jews race mixed their land and made them slaves then God helped them and they left Egypt and then they came actually to America.First Americans were white thats why they have found rune stones in viking that have the 10 commandments on them here.Middle eastern Israel is not site of acient hebrew migration.Its a lie.Indians were slaves to the vikings here.They stayed and we left back to europe thats who Hernando Cortez seemed to be their white god and he took over so.
Land of milk and honey can not be related to middle eastern Israel.That isnt actually Israel.King Davids Empire was in what is known today as America.
Just as I have always believed Israel never was in the middle east.LOL.Their goes the American original; Idian theory.Original Americans left and now have came back.This is way you see egyption style relics in mexico and why Cortez was excepted so well.America was and always has been Israel it was reborn in 1776 not 1948 Shocker lol.Yep.
Eurocentric propaganda (lies)! Eurocentric (Albino) barbarian, are you hoping that your great great great grandmother was the bitch of my great great great grandfather? Even the Eurocentric/Nordic Channel, I mean the History Channel denies such outrageuos claims by Eurocentrics like you. Don't forget to make a video about the Nordic theory; that the worst barbarians of Europe, the Vikings, came to our Continent in the 10th Century, and didn't pillage, kill, and infect the Natives.
@slavsyarus1 haha disagree i think the worst mistake is not genociding the indians in the americas we had a good thing going for a while but injuns breed like rats and are the cause of all mexicos shortcomming.
@luis30531 Spanish Moor (half Albino) bend over for your British (Albino) Masters. ha ha Do you think the most pale of all Albinos, (the Nordic race) likes the Mediterranean race? ha ha It's as laughable as watching Russians ( the Slavic race) dress as Nazis. Actually most Mexicans are Natives and not Mestizos, dumbass. That mestizo crap has nothing to do with Natives mixing with the ugly Spanish Moors. Rather is a cultural thing, clothes, language, and so on... and not blood mixing.
@NativeWarriorXib no we Mediterranean and Nordic get along its the Slavics and Arabs we dont like. and in the northern Mexican Mestizos have been geneticaly tested to be 60% Caucasian and the rest native while to southern Mestizos the darker ones that are 90% of immigrants to the US are only 35-40% caucasian. they and full caste indians migrate to the US because White and true Mestizos dont like inferrior indians. almost the same story in the rest of Ibero America
@MaskedTehGamer Why are they not civilized? Every race managed to build a civilization. But sub-Saharan Africans are the only exception. They are more related to gorillas than to humans.
The genetic mutation affecting the OCA2 gene in your chromosomes resulted in the creation of a switch which literally turned off' the ability to produce brown eyes and it is NOT at least 12,000 years old either cracker. its 6000 years old. But I can understand why the crackers that control population genetics choose to say this mutation happened 6000-12,000 tears ago..Others say 10,000-6000 years ago and this is because then cracker is a cogenital liar! YOU have existed no longer than 6000 yrs
I live in the NE US. Why would it be odd to think Europeans came here when Europe is closer than Asia, where NAs came from? Heck, it was a shorter walk across the edge of the ice sheets and paleolithic Europeans also had boats. To think it impossible is just silly. If Asiatics made it here then it's entirely reasonable that Eurpeans, with superior tech, could make an even shorter voyage. THINK, PEOPLE! THINK!!!
Let me tell you brain dead delusional people who the stone age people of Europe were! LOL They are the Khoisan people! The San and Khoi BLACK AFRICANS (SAN BUSHMAN) or what you call "grimaldi man" AND today's San and Khoi people are identical to their ancient skeletal remains that have been found in Europe whichare their descendants! The white man is NOT indigeanous to Europe but rather from ASIA! And your ancestorsmigrated into Europe from the place of their evolution WHICH IS ASIA!
@MsBlackmagic13 The first "white" people originated in the Caucasus mountains. OCA2 shows ot originate their around the time Gobekli Tepe was inhabited. They migrated in all directions from there, as evidenced by DNA studies. And no black Africans ever made it to Europe until they were imported as slaves. Not a day sooner.
The Windover bog mummies have been found to be BLACK Australoids which makes perfect sense since the indigenous people of the Americas were "homo sapiens" with no 48 chromosome APE DNA and no 42 chromosome MONKEY blood from Austrailia, sub saharan Africa, southern asia, and the southern pacific rim! There was not ONE cracker or his mogoloid cousin in site! The cracker did not even EXIST at this time! and the OLDEST remains of ANY cracker ever found are in your homeland of Asia @ 1800 BCE LOL
@MsBlackmagic13 Wow, where the Hell did you find that info? The OCA2 gene is at least 12000 years old and originated in Eastern Turkey. Find out what OCA2 is then come back here.....educated.
@Fjallgeirr LOL.. Alfonso Torre Blanco researcher at the Faculty of Sciences of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico say, MUJER DEL PEÑON DE LOS BAÑOS; The research techniques were applied to obtain the mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA) to monitor racial affinity in terms of migration especially likely in the order determined geoclimatic=ASIA and she has the lineage A the most common in Mesoamerica, just like WOMAN de las palmas
Radiocarbon tests of carbonized plant remains where artifacts were unearthed last May along the Savannah River in Allendale County by University of South Carolina archaeologist Dr. Albert Goodyear indicate that the sediments containing these artifacts are at least 50,000 years old,and the date keeps getting earlier, there were some vikings that were here but they inter-married, look at the way the first Americans were kept alive their first winters, they got likked for doing it..par for course
this of course, doesn't excuse the crimes of the white race. white people make me so sick. i am not personally affected by these crimes, but you cannot hide history from the world. It is not just blacks and natives that hate you anymore, it is anyone that can read a book. We all hate you. go back to your caves.
The Windover Bog mummy DNA findings are an unreliable source. Its ironic that the media has coverage over the Bog Mummies of Florida, yet they leave out the mtDNA findings of Wizards Beach, On-your-knees cave, and Hourglass cave. These three mummies are all older than the Florida Bog, and they have Native American haplogroups B, C, and D.
Do u see any skin or hair on "them thar bones"? We don't know the skin color of any ancient peoples. We do know that when Modern Europeans arrived in the Americas, they didn't recognize any of the Natives as like them, so they unabashedly slaughtered them. Many of the Eastern tribes were completely obliterated. Can we stop looking for "I am superior" points and start recognizing that we have more in common. The time is coming when we will really need one another.
Also, if these Solutrean connection theorists are trying to claim that Europeans were here first, they are going to have a difficult time trying to explain why the Negroid morphology exists in the ancient remains of South Americans. The remains of one woman, dubbed Luzia, along with a man dubbed with the acronym SR-1, both of whom are older that Penon Woman and have Negroid morphology. The fact of the matter is that these ancient people were the ancestors of modern American Indians.
@akichita87 .... those statues look just as much like many of the indigenous people down there. I am an American living in Central America and I can tell you the people that live here look like those statues. I know Blacks like to stretch anything they can to show Blacks were once civilized, but you are making a serious stretch on this one. The only real African thing (other than AIDS) that has come out of Africa is voodoo.
I am not trying to imply that "paleo-americans" were ancient Africans, nor ancient Europeans. I am just trying to point out the cranial morphological differences among ancient Americans. There is too much diversity between their appearancances to pre-maturely conclude that they were ancient seafarers from across the atlantic. The only reliable evidence that I have come across thus far is from the genetic findings, which suggest that modern Amerindians are their descendents.
@akichita87 well there is something alot of people seem to ignore . . . . humans can come from a myriad of locations
I know it seems like a white supremisist thing to say, but there is no reason humans couldnt have traveled from asia, europe, and africa
the only reason people provide for why they couldnt, is the assumption that humans before now had no technology (seriously you ask the history channel they will probably claim that the technology to make the empire state building didnt exsist)
@Ralokone I can see how this can come off as ethnocentrism. It is a highly sensitive topic, but I think we should all put aside our bias, and search for the truth. Yes, I suppose it is possible for people to have come from across the Atlantic during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), which ended around 13,000 years ago. However, I don't see the connection between this and the Solutrean culture, which evidently ended around 19,000 years ago, far too early.
@akichita87 I think a far more likely, and far more interesting theory is that either the humans of the native americas devided into far more racial groups than previously thought quicker than thought, possibly developing parallelt technologies (it would be interesting if the technologies were developed by the wrong race)
and it is far more interesting an idea that humans come from all over the place
@akichita87 also in the related videos there is "the Religion of White Supremacy"
also on a somewhat unrelated note, I was reading about a mayan temple with carvings of elephants in it, and there are turks and all sorks of people claiming to be the source of mayan culture because of this
but all I can think is that . . . . well . . . .mammoths roamed america not so long ago
@akichita87 "Luzia Woman" was a big lie by a Brazilian anthropologist, who later accepted the similarity between "Luzia" and the "Botocudos" of Brazil. What do you expect from an anthropologist who only sees white and black people! He didn't even know the characteristics of the Native People of Brazil. He only accepted his error after 3 anthropologist put him in his place (Rolando Gonzalez-Jose, Frank Williams and William Armelagos). Afrocentrics till this day take his lie, seriously!
@Luigi84289 I am not sure what you're stance is on this subject, but there are multiple theories. Do you believe in the multiple migration theory, the Solutrean Connection theory, Clovis First, etc...? I believe in the traditional model that there was a single migration of Siberian peoples and that the morphological differences between ancient and modern Amerindians can be explained by severe environmental factors, genetic drift, bottle neck, and isolation.
Kinnewick Man. Clovis People. Clovis (radiocarbon dated between 11,600-11,000 years before the present), Folsom (10,800-10,000 years BP), Portales (9,800-8,000 years BP), and Archaic (7,000-5,000 years BP) period occupations.
the latest studies show that the ice-free corridor didn't exist until around 12,000 years ago - too late to have served as the route for the very first people to come to America.
a rock overhang in Pennsylvania called Meadowcroft, where a 30-year campaign of excavation suggests that hunters may have reached the Northeast 3,000 or 4,000 years before the Clovis era.
Instead of a single leaf-shaped Clovis spearhead, ice age Siberian hunters made projectiles that were bristling with rows of tiny razor-like blades embedded in wooden shafts. that meant no Siberian hunters armed with Clovis technology had walked to the Americas.
You missed the point of my arguement. If haplogroups A and B are the most common haplogroups among Native North Americans, then why are they both almost nonexistent in Chinese, Mongolian, and Japanese peoples? It shouldn't be suprising that a haplogroup like X, went missing among Siberian peoples, like A and B did.
The case isn't closed on this yet. Just because haplogroup X is found in Americas and in Europe that doesn't mean that Europeans crossed the Atlantic. First of all, haplogroup X is rare everywhere. Its rare in Europeans, and its rare in Amerindians. It has been found among Asian peoples, in particular Altaic peoples. Haplogroup A is the most common haplogroup among Native North Americans, yet it is rare among Siberian peoples such as the Mongolians and the Chinese.
First skull. Look at the eye sockets lower outside corners. That is the zygomatic bones. Notice the rim is tilted forward. That is the Native American feature which caucasians do not have. Notice the lower jaw is semicircular and not narrow. This also is a Native American feature. This is a Native American skull
Yes, the evidence exists that Paleoamericans had a caucasoid morphology, that doesn't mean that Europeans crossed over the Atlantic. What people don't get is that the Mongoloid morphology, the trait that East Asian and Native American peoples exhibit, is very young compared to the other two human morphologies, Caucasoid and Negroid. The earliest Americans, known as Paleoamericans, were the Proto-Mongoloid peoples of todays American Indian and Asian peoples.
Paleoamericans (i.e. Penon woman, kennewick man) are the ancestors of modern Native Americans. DNA studies have proven this already. The haplogroup x found in amerindians is also found to be ancestral among siberian peoples in Central Asia, indians brought X into America themselves. The earliest Mongoloid peoples are found in North America, not Asia, suggesting an origin in America, and an ancestral/descendant relationship between Paleoamericans and modern Amerindians.
This theory explains why we find bloodgroup A in the native population of North America....In South America it's 100(!)% bloodgroup 0 .The two parts of America discovered from different people.......The north from ice-specialized hunters from Siberia and Europe and the south from an other asian population.....
This theory explains why we find in bloodgroup in the native population of North America....In South America it's 100(!)% bloodgroup 0 .The two parts of America discovered from different people.......The north from ice-specialized hunters from Siberia and Europe and the south from an other asian population.....
The German Phallus (photo)was found in same area cave as Lion man& Waterbird & dated to 30,000 bce. Lion man & Water Bird found on many artifacts in West Virginia.Water Bird is the symbol that is same as the Phallus symbol on this WV artifact.
The Lion Man and Water Bird are the oldest sculptured artifacts in the world accepted by established archaeology.
These same symbols can be found on the West Virginia artifacts many times they are the main symbols most often seen.
So I guess that's why the Europeans were also able to dominate every single country in Africa and reach the apex of civilization while Africans continued to swing off jungle vines?
Most bigots disagree but the scientific community agrees, there is only one human race. IDC if you don't believe me. My family goes back millions of years, my grandma was Lucy, she was not Homo Sapien Sapien she was Australopithecus afarensis.
I know times are hard and you're probably struggling financially, economically, and with family but Don't let hate, get the best of you. Blacks and whites are not different species. Blacks and whites can breed new HomoSapien Sapiens, FACT!
Most bigots disagree but the scientific community agrees, there is only one human (((((Species))))). IDC if you don't believe me. My family goes back millions of years, my grandma was Lucy, she was not Homo Sapien Sapien she was Australopithecus afarensis.
I'll reiterate my earlier posts. Pinon woman is not the oldest remain in the americas. Several others, such as Santa Lagao (SR-1) man and Luzia (woman) date from 12,700-13,400 y.o. These two were negroid in cranial morphology (i.e. Melanasian). Also, Pinon woman, and others like her were most likely close relatives of Polynesians. Recent mtDNA evidence suggests that modern Amerindians are descendents of these early peoples, because mtDNA of these early remains have shown haplos B, C, and D.
..I HEARD AN OLD INDIAN MAN ONCE REPLY TO A QUESTION..."OLD INDIAN MAN YOU HAVE BEEN ALIVE FOR 90 YEARS AND SEEN THE ADVANCES AND TECHNOLOGY WHITE MAN HAS MADE WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT?"...INDIAN MAN SAID:"B4 WHITE MAN CAME HERE, THERE WERE PLEANTY OF BUFFALO AND BEAVERS.ETC..CLEAN RIVER WATER...WOMEN DO ALL WORK WHILE MAN HUNTS AND FISHES ALL DAY AND HAS SEX ALL NIGHT.ONLY WHITE MAN IS STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK HE CAN IMPROVE THE SYSTEM"..LOL
@ViolentVikingStorm If you want watch David Wilcock of Project Camelot. He doesn't buy the out of Africa Theory and he teaches that the White Race was the last race put here by Aliens, and he also teaches that this Earth only produced Black People, all the other races came from other planets. He says where all human, I don't buy his teaching, but my research shows 8000 BCE for whites and 6000 BCE for Asians from Natural and Sexual Selection. He puts the reverse dates for their arrival.
@ViolentVikingStorm took it, but that was then. If you guys grow out of your need to control everything, I'm sure the world will share it's resources with you, ask the Church Missionaries at that time how peacefully the natives American and Africans where before Columbus, that book is called The Story of Civilization, check Vol. 6. I actually think some Europeans must have crossed the ocean before Columbus, just as long as they don't use the concept as a way of excusing how horrible America was.
@ViolentVikingStorm I'm not saying that's all you guys do, but this is why you guys rule the world. Read "Guns Germs and Steel", and then Read "Black Athena", and while your at it Read "The Peoples History of the United States. If you want my opinion on why Rich whites lie to everybody, it's so we don't realize that South America and Africa have all the resources and if left alone would naturally be the riches continents. I understand that the Vikings are born in Ice and didn't have food so they
@ViolentVikingStorm 5th. Did the colonizers from Europe report meeting white Tribes or did they report meeting people that where cooper color? And finally, even if white people where the 1st on the continent it wouldn't excuse all the horrible things they did. History is written by the winners, so we know we don't have all the facts on the past. The rich whites lie to their "own" people so you guys will side with them, when you should've side with us. Whites are advance in War, not Civilization.
@ViolentVikingStrom, A Jaw bone, let me know when they find a full skeleton. Have you ever hear of Piltdown man it was a hoax, google it. 2nd. Watch DNA proves Chinese are from Africa. 3rd. Watch Tim Wise On White Privilege (Clip), Racism isn't an accident of man, it was created. Herodotus a Greek Historian in about 400 BCE says that Ethiopian men are the best looking, just his opinion, but proof people don't automatically hate each other for looking different. 4th. WatchThe First Europeans.
White skin appears in 8,000 BCE, Asian Skin appears in 6,000 BCE. Look it up. SOY Ketia's Oxnard lecture (search on you tube) shows that a "Cascasian skull found in Africa in 60,000 BCE, was actually not European as we say, because that's 10,000 yrs before they left Africa. In other words bone can't tell you what color a person was. The first people everywhere where Black African, skin color adaptation hit 8000 BCE and then with mixing and migrating Asian Skin appears 2000 years later.
@divp169 Check out this video. "Out of africa theory going down the tubes on you tube" Pretty good evidence on debunking your so called Out of Africa theory which doesn't make a bit of sense. Also, Kennewick man is white and thats exactly why The Umatilla, who have taken the lead on the issue, intend immediate reburial in a secret location. The remains now lie in a federal repository awaiting resolution. The fucking Indians sued because they know it was a white person and they want to hide it.
Just too bad color separates any people that were here first. We're related to anyone and everyone who came over first or last whether people here like it or not.
Thanks for the input, however, I must disagree with you about haplogroup x not being found in Siberia. "More recently, haplogroups A, B, C, D, and X..., have all been reported in an Altai population from southern Siberia (Derenko et al. 2001), where archaelogical sites dating to at least 20,000 yr B.P. are found (Goebel 1999)." (mitochondrial dna haplogroups of Paleoamericans in North America, circa 2005).
this is white brainwashing, first they kill indians, take the land now they want to take our identity. europeans are filthy pagan baarbarians, the only place they can call home is EUROPE where they aktually have a birthright. Kennick man and other so called white skulls is scientific racism at its best. Indians OWN this entire hemisphere and we will take back my land and finlly put u white savages in ur place. This is NOT ur land.
As a Native American myself, I'd have to say that you are not representing native peoples in a positive way. There is no need for racial smearing. You end up sounding no better off than a white supremist.
@akichita87 ummm ok well while our mother(earth) is being raped...what do u want us to do about it???im over here tryin to start a revolution u over here fuckin it up...now kick rocks...ive been raped of my culture and language..and i see other cultures have theirs...so suck a fuckn dick..watch a cowboy movie and see how they talk about us
@thiizzman510 i agree...history is "his-story" and can not be proven entirely, and notice at the end they said migrations...if you migrating their is no permanent spot...but some not all white only want to hear what they want and therefore they pay a lot of money for mock research to prove that they are better than any other culture...funny they never get the hint know one cares
No, the Ainu are not Caucasian, they don't even share similar haplotypes. In fact, modern American Indians are more closely related to Caucasians than Caucasians are to ancient south east Asians. Crazy huh?
Also, Penon woman is not the oldest remain found in the Americas. Luzia and Santana do Riacho I (SR-I) are two remains dated at 12,600 and 13,400 years old. They were found in South America, and have been found to resemble Australian Aboriginees and Africans.
@akichita87 Yea I know the Ainu aren't Caucasian. I meant like I was questioning this video's false information. Wow, well that really makes this video invalid then! ;] Either way, what matters is that the Natives established themselves on this landmass, and quite a few created sophisticated societies, were those ancient Siberians were the 1st ones to cross or not...
@JohnnyK98k Yes it is a lie. Know your history this is bullshit. Why do you think a computer is doing the talking. Im sure Caucasians would like to feel like they where on this EARTH 1st but they where NOT! The whole world knows this.
Incorrect. Many anthropologists and scientist know this as a fact. It is taught in Universities and schools everywhere in the world. It's even shown on TV on channels like discovery:
watch?v=a2OIfcA6hWw
Or, read it in a book... The truth is, you're denying facts. You don't want to believe that Europeans did in fact come to the Americas first. Are you jealous? You shouldn't be. If you are, thats quite sad. Continue living your life blind folded. :)
True. But there are many more paleo-anthropologists, archeaologists, and historians that disagree with this theory. The idea that the Solutreans influenced Clovis spear point technology is, in the words of the U.S.s' leading expert in Solutrean culture, Lawrence Straus, "ludicrous". "The first problem is that Clovis began no earlier than 13,500 years ago, whereas the Solutrean ended by 19,700." (Dr. James Chatter, Ancient Encounters, p. 261).
Most anthropologists and geneticists agree that these early peoples, known as Paleo-Americans, were decendents of people related to the Polynesians and Australian Aboriginees.
that's why you red indians are trying so desperately to sue the scientists who want to do DNA studies and halt the process that's already begun and shown that neither the morphology nor the skull shapes belong to you Siberian invaders. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Ultimate FAIL
DNA studies have been conducted on several Paleo-Americans throughout the Americas, none of them showing a strong relationship to European ancestery. In the words of Dr. James Chatters, he said that DNA has been successfully extracted from at least a dozen Paleo-Am. from North America, showing haplogroup B, C, and D (paraphrased from Ancient Encounters).
WRONG! Haplogroups A, B and C are found in modern American Indians, and are comparable to those of North East Asians (AKA Orientals) and yet Haplogroup X, which constitutes over 25% of the genetic make up of the Great Lakes Indians is purely Europeans. RACIST! LIAR~!
Second of all, the only haplogroup that even remotely ties Europe to America is X, which geneticists have already found to have originated in Central Asia. Also, X is found in the Altai region among Mongoloid peoples.
And who are you to call me racist? You hypocrite. All I am doing is presenting the truth. On the contrary, it seems like people like you are so desperate to try and prove that whites are the master race, and everybody should accept it.
if you had done any research, you would also know that the original people of Central Asia (AKA Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan etc...) where WHITE, Caucasian people. The area didn't receive an influx of Mongoloid blood until the 5th-6th centuries when Turks and various Altaic people came from Mongolia and either killed or absorbed, earlier Iraniac speaking populations of Khwarazmians, Sarmatians, Kushans, Scythians etc...
Thus WRONG and I leave that master race to a RACIST LIKE YOU!
In conclusion, I have to say that Europeans have a beautiful culture. I don't see why you, and others like you, are trying to step on everybody else's culture in order to prove it.
Haplogroup X did not originate among the people of Kazakhstan, and the other aforemention groups. The timeline for the divergence of X is several of thousands of years older than the modern Caucasian complex. You have no scientifict backing in trying to assert that it originated among Caucasians.
"More recently, haplogroups A, B, C, D, and X... have all been reported in an Altai population from southern Siberia (Derenko, 2001), where archaelogical sites dating to at least 20,000 yr B.P. are found. The ancestors of this population represent the only known surviving... source for peopling of the New World via a single migration. The region of southern Siberia, the hypothesized origin location of two of the most common Native American Y-chromosome haplotypes."
@akichita87 Some of your info is off. X is not found in Siberia. it is found with Semitic people. Also the majority of the mongol gene pool is found in South America, not North America with no actual evidence of any land bridge. This has always been only theory. We do, however, have evidence of great sailing nations in ancient history:)
"...the origin of two of the most common Native Am. Y-chrom. haplotypes, might have provided the staging point for both the migration that introduced all five haplogroups into the Americas and haplogroups A, C, and D into eastern Siberia."
"The present study provides no support for the hypotheses that the first Americans (Paleoamericans) were not the direct ancestors of modern Native Americans" (David Smith, Ripan Malhi, Jason Eshlemah, Fredericka Kaestle, Brian Kemp, 2005)
F.Y.I. Solutrean culture ended around 15,000 years ago, Clovis culture began no earlier than 8,000 years ago. Second, Clovis is not the oldest culture in the Americas. Third, the oldest remains are found in S. America and resemble African and Aboriginee peoples (i.e. Luzia, 13,000 yrs old). Fourth, DNA testing has been conducted on both North and South Paleo-Americans, revealing haplogroups B,C, D, and N (which are not European, but S.E. Asian). Fifth, haplo B, C, and D exist in Amerindians.
Its interesting that when an ancient skeleton that resembles Polynesians is found, the white supremists jump on it to add fuel to their ethnocentrism. Why don't we see as much hype about the fact that the ancient remains found in south america (which are much older than those found in North America) closely resemble Australian Aboriginees and African peoples?
Bull S***. From the 40 or so Paleo. South Am skulls studied by anthropologists James Chatters and Walter Neves, they agree that Paleo-S Americans are morphologically similar to Africans and Aboriginees. Source: Ancient Encounters by James C. Chatters.
@akichita87 nope ,uzia had been debunked they were paleo indians Botocudo afro clowns love to claim they were black but that just isnt true.ill send you a link as a pm ok..she is not even the oldest skull anymore =]
@crypter27 WRONG New radiocarbon dating of Clovis-culture materials shows that this group inhabited the Americas a little later and for a shorter period of time than previously believed. Archaeological evidence of human occupation in South America also dates to the same time as the Clovis-culture materials. This suggests that people were living in the Americas before the Clovis people arrived.
@crypter27 and if your interested in this history you will be called a white supremists...apparantly your also a white supremist if you think it is unfair that your paying taxes so other people don't have to because they are supposedly the first people here...you can't want to know your history or hey your a white supremist....heck if your proud of anything to do with your race your a white supremist...and well it is perfectly ok to call you a cracker too!
@lucy9359 So your'e a white supremists if you think the income tax & the welfare state is unconstitutional & your'e a white supremist if the facts support a politically inceorrect truth you know how stupid that sounds?
@MrPa1310 If that is how you feel then I suggest you go and have DNA profiling done and prove you only have Mexican blood and absolutely no Spanish in you what so ever or your disqualified like 90% of you...Oh ya and after that you may need to go back to Asia or over your Mongolion blood...other wise were staying!
@lucy9359 oh but wait se i thought mongolions were from asain, arent they asain natives hahaha. you fucking idiot. im native American with little spanish blood which im ok with i love my spanish people. but hey, i born on native land with native people with native blood. what do you got to say about that. wannabe. i choose what i wanna be labeled as and i say im native American as my race but as my culture and nationality im mexican and spanish and im proud.
@MrPa1310 a wanna be what? I don't get it why would I be any less than happy to be exactly who I am? I have a job I love I married a man who is kind to me I have 3 beautiful daughters...I live in a safe neighbourhood in Canada with towering pine trees to look out my window at walking trails in my back yard...I wake up to birds singing every morning...I have a lot to be thankful for I am not wanna be anything...I thank God each day for the life he gave me...I am blessed!
@lucy9359 sounds like you have a great life. i did not know that. i did not know that married moms have youtube accounts or i would of been more respectful.
@MrPa1310 well I have it for work because I am a researcher...and on that note...I thank you for deciding to be respectful...may I suggest however that you do that any way in light of the young single woman who are on here...It is a great thing to show them respect also...I wouldn't have liked being swore at when I was 20 any more than I do at 40 and I think most people in general prefer not to be swore at or called names!
for monitoring racial affinity in terms of likely migration especially in certain lineages geoclimatic order: A, B, C and D are distinguished by mitochondrial DNA mutations that originally occurred in Asian descent and she has "a" which indicates its origin Asia.
this just tells me that these people came from europe and they became native americans just like some of the people came from asia and became native american
There is even more evidence that the first Europeans were Native Americans. (Basque/Razna/Illyric)The first Caucasians in Europe (Hellenic/Latin/Celtic)merely 7000 years ago. The remains found at Medowcroft, PA are without doubt Native American and are 16,000 years old. Amerind remains 43,000 years old have been found in Brazil, new finds in Chile and Bolivia are even older. (before Caucasians existed). The Ainu are descended from the Dogon people NOT Caucasians!
@tekkentoni18 Funny how you call Them "native" it is accepted fact that indians came from mongolia over the berring land bridge so the are NOT "native" to north america. Looks like the term "first nations" is also a lie by these mogols that claim to be something they are not !
@bigrigbob2010 It is also accepted fact that Europeans came from Africa if you go back far enough. So why do we call them "Native" to Europe? Native Americans are "native" to North America because they were the FIRST humans to inhabit the lands and did so for such a long time that they physically adapted to the environment just as Europeans adapted to theirs (White skin, light hair, etc..) Native Americans are not "mongols" you ignorant.
@SixtiesFan90 Wrong again. There are only three races in the world. Caucasians are indigenous to the American Continent, Japan, France, Spain. Mongoloids are indigenous to Russia, Asia Turkey, Greece. Negroids are indigenous to Africa.
I was born in Virginia and my pastor in my church years ago taught this as truth even before their was a Youtube.
Phantom14ify 1 month ago
@Phantom14ify Good man!
DemocracyCountsx 1 month ago
@DemocracyCountsx Thanks but its a secret I guess to much and most I guess.
Phantom14ify 1 month ago
They left egypt after the jews race mixed their land and made them slaves then God helped them and they left Egypt and then they came actually to America.First Americans were white thats why they have found rune stones in viking that have the 10 commandments on them here.Middle eastern Israel is not site of acient hebrew migration.Its a lie.Indians were slaves to the vikings here.They stayed and we left back to europe thats who Hernando Cortez seemed to be their white god and he took over so.
Phantom14ify 1 month ago
Land of milk and honey can not be related to middle eastern Israel.That isnt actually Israel.King Davids Empire was in what is known today as America.
Phantom14ify 1 month ago
Just as I have always believed Israel never was in the middle east.LOL.Their goes the American original; Idian theory.Original Americans left and now have came back.This is way you see egyption style relics in mexico and why Cortez was excepted so well.America was and always has been Israel it was reborn in 1776 not 1948 Shocker lol.Yep.
Phantom14ify 1 month ago
This is going to piss off a lot of people.
fabioeoch 2 months ago
hahaha im native American and white and damn proud. fuck the afrocentrics who claim the olmecs.
MrPa1310 4 months ago 9
......interesting
MrPa1310 4 months ago
Why would anyone care?
Weesnauh 4 months ago
@Weesnauh Truth
Luigi84289 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Eurocentric propaganda (lies)! Eurocentric (Albino) barbarian, are you hoping that your great great great grandmother was the bitch of my great great great grandfather? Even the Eurocentric/Nordic Channel, I mean the History Channel denies such outrageuos claims by Eurocentrics like you. Don't forget to make a video about the Nordic theory; that the worst barbarians of Europe, the Vikings, came to our Continent in the 10th Century, and didn't pillage, kill, and infect the Natives.
NativeWarriorXib 4 months ago
thx for uploading the truth
EagleMarine2012 4 months ago
@slavsyarus1 haha disagree i think the worst mistake is not genociding the indians in the americas we had a good thing going for a while but injuns breed like rats and are the cause of all mexicos shortcomming.
luis30531 4 months ago
@luis30531 Spanish Moor (half Albino) bend over for your British (Albino) Masters. ha ha Do you think the most pale of all Albinos, (the Nordic race) likes the Mediterranean race? ha ha It's as laughable as watching Russians ( the Slavic race) dress as Nazis. Actually most Mexicans are Natives and not Mestizos, dumbass. That mestizo crap has nothing to do with Natives mixing with the ugly Spanish Moors. Rather is a cultural thing, clothes, language, and so on... and not blood mixing.
NativeWarriorXib 4 months ago
@NativeWarriorXib no we Mediterranean and Nordic get along its the Slavics and Arabs we dont like. and in the northern Mexican Mestizos have been geneticaly tested to be 60% Caucasian and the rest native while to southern Mestizos the darker ones that are 90% of immigrants to the US are only 35-40% caucasian. they and full caste indians migrate to the US because White and true Mestizos dont like inferrior indians. almost the same story in the rest of Ibero America
luis30531 3 months ago
@luis30531
there are no "inferior" races
MaskedTehGamer 3 months ago
@MaskedTehGamer really? explain then why every majority black nation is 3rd world?
TribalSocialism 2 months ago
@TribalSocialism
Because they are not civilized.
MaskedTehGamer 2 months ago
@MaskedTehGamer Why are they not civilized? Every race managed to build a civilization. But sub-Saharan Africans are the only exception. They are more related to gorillas than to humans.
hardstyle905 1 month ago
actualy most mexicans are mestizo, half white so with out us europeans mexicans nor Mexico would exist
luis30531 5 months ago
There was no ancient "White" migrations! Stone age Europeans weren't white in the modern sense. You're being dishonest.
LigaFantasma 5 months ago
The genetic mutation affecting the OCA2 gene in your chromosomes resulted in the creation of a switch which literally turned off' the ability to produce brown eyes and it is NOT at least 12,000 years old either cracker. its 6000 years old. But I can understand why the crackers that control population genetics choose to say this mutation happened 6000-12,000 tears ago..Others say 10,000-6000 years ago and this is because then cracker is a cogenital liar! YOU have existed no longer than 6000 yrs
MsBlackmagic13 6 months ago
I live in the NE US. Why would it be odd to think Europeans came here when Europe is closer than Asia, where NAs came from? Heck, it was a shorter walk across the edge of the ice sheets and paleolithic Europeans also had boats. To think it impossible is just silly. If Asiatics made it here then it's entirely reasonable that Eurpeans, with superior tech, could make an even shorter voyage. THINK, PEOPLE! THINK!!!
gvman3670 6 months ago
Let me tell you brain dead delusional people who the stone age people of Europe were! LOL They are the Khoisan people! The San and Khoi BLACK AFRICANS (SAN BUSHMAN) or what you call "grimaldi man" AND today's San and Khoi people are identical to their ancient skeletal remains that have been found in Europe whichare their descendants! The white man is NOT indigeanous to Europe but rather from ASIA! And your ancestorsmigrated into Europe from the place of their evolution WHICH IS ASIA!
MsBlackmagic13 6 months ago
@MsBlackmagic13 The first "white" people originated in the Caucasus mountains. OCA2 shows ot originate their around the time Gobekli Tepe was inhabited. They migrated in all directions from there, as evidenced by DNA studies. And no black Africans ever made it to Europe until they were imported as slaves. Not a day sooner.
gvman3670 6 months ago
The Windover bog mummies have been found to be BLACK Australoids which makes perfect sense since the indigenous people of the Americas were "homo sapiens" with no 48 chromosome APE DNA and no 42 chromosome MONKEY blood from Austrailia, sub saharan Africa, southern asia, and the southern pacific rim! There was not ONE cracker or his mogoloid cousin in site! The cracker did not even EXIST at this time! and the OLDEST remains of ANY cracker ever found are in your homeland of Asia @ 1800 BCE LOL
MsBlackmagic13 6 months ago
@MsBlackmagic13 Wow, where the Hell did you find that info? The OCA2 gene is at least 12000 years old and originated in Eastern Turkey. Find out what OCA2 is then come back here.....educated.
gvman3670 6 months ago
This is very interesting and warrants more research.
bwild61 6 months ago
quetzlcoatl? Culcukan?
killerrey 6 months ago
why do people always assume because one race or the other was here whenever ... that they are the parents off all who came after ????
chiefy67 7 months ago
ice age tribe=basque people...yup dna proves it!!!
TheBasqueLand 7 months ago
Thank You for #sharing ! Truth #FTW
Fjallgeirr 7 months ago 4
@Fjallgeirr LOL.. Alfonso Torre Blanco researcher at the Faculty of Sciences of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico say, MUJER DEL PEÑON DE LOS BAÑOS; The research techniques were applied to obtain the mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA) to monitor racial affinity in terms of migration especially likely in the order determined geoclimatic=ASIA and she has the lineage A the most common in Mesoamerica, just like WOMAN de las palmas
watch?v=pbuqe3_ggmc
exupipus 7 months ago
Radiocarbon tests of carbonized plant remains where artifacts were unearthed last May along the Savannah River in Allendale County by University of South Carolina archaeologist Dr. Albert Goodyear indicate that the sediments containing these artifacts are at least 50,000 years old,and the date keeps getting earlier, there were some vikings that were here but they inter-married, look at the way the first Americans were kept alive their first winters, they got likked for doing it..par for course
Superdave1ize 7 months ago
this of course, doesn't excuse the crimes of the white race. white people make me so sick. i am not personally affected by these crimes, but you cannot hide history from the world. It is not just blacks and natives that hate you anymore, it is anyone that can read a book. We all hate you. go back to your caves.
hslayerm 8 months ago
@hslayerm well if that isn't racist, I don't know what is. Please delete your youtube profile, you are to stupid and naive, even for the internet.
mafiaslicka 7 months ago
its very foolish to think that Columbus was the"first"ever European settler in N.A
EagleMarine2012 10 months ago
@p0r110
The Windover Bog mummy DNA findings are an unreliable source. Its ironic that the media has coverage over the Bog Mummies of Florida, yet they leave out the mtDNA findings of Wizards Beach, On-your-knees cave, and Hourglass cave. These three mummies are all older than the Florida Bog, and they have Native American haplogroups B, C, and D.
akichita87 10 months ago
Do u see any skin or hair on "them thar bones"? We don't know the skin color of any ancient peoples. We do know that when Modern Europeans arrived in the Americas, they didn't recognize any of the Natives as like them, so they unabashedly slaughtered them. Many of the Eastern tribes were completely obliterated. Can we stop looking for "I am superior" points and start recognizing that we have more in common. The time is coming when we will really need one another.
celainea 11 months ago
Also, if these Solutrean connection theorists are trying to claim that Europeans were here first, they are going to have a difficult time trying to explain why the Negroid morphology exists in the ancient remains of South Americans. The remains of one woman, dubbed Luzia, along with a man dubbed with the acronym SR-1, both of whom are older that Penon Woman and have Negroid morphology. The fact of the matter is that these ancient people were the ancestors of modern American Indians.
akichita87 11 months ago 2
@akichita87 .... those statues look just as much like many of the indigenous people down there. I am an American living in Central America and I can tell you the people that live here look like those statues. I know Blacks like to stretch anything they can to show Blacks were once civilized, but you are making a serious stretch on this one. The only real African thing (other than AIDS) that has come out of Africa is voodoo.
Beelzabubalicious 7 months ago
@Beelzabubalicious
I am not trying to imply that "paleo-americans" were ancient Africans, nor ancient Europeans. I am just trying to point out the cranial morphological differences among ancient Americans. There is too much diversity between their appearancances to pre-maturely conclude that they were ancient seafarers from across the atlantic. The only reliable evidence that I have come across thus far is from the genetic findings, which suggest that modern Amerindians are their descendents.
akichita87 6 months ago in playlist White Supremacy
@akichita87 well there is something alot of people seem to ignore . . . . humans can come from a myriad of locations
I know it seems like a white supremisist thing to say, but there is no reason humans couldnt have traveled from asia, europe, and africa
the only reason people provide for why they couldnt, is the assumption that humans before now had no technology (seriously you ask the history channel they will probably claim that the technology to make the empire state building didnt exsist)
Ralokone 6 months ago
@Ralokone I can see how this can come off as ethnocentrism. It is a highly sensitive topic, but I think we should all put aside our bias, and search for the truth. Yes, I suppose it is possible for people to have come from across the Atlantic during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), which ended around 13,000 years ago. However, I don't see the connection between this and the Solutrean culture, which evidently ended around 19,000 years ago, far too early.
akichita87 6 months ago
@akichita87 I think a far more likely, and far more interesting theory is that either the humans of the native americas devided into far more racial groups than previously thought quicker than thought, possibly developing parallelt technologies (it would be interesting if the technologies were developed by the wrong race)
and it is far more interesting an idea that humans come from all over the place
not just humans coming from a single source
Ralokone 6 months ago
@akichita87 also in the related videos there is "the Religion of White Supremacy"
also on a somewhat unrelated note, I was reading about a mayan temple with carvings of elephants in it, and there are turks and all sorks of people claiming to be the source of mayan culture because of this
but all I can think is that . . . . well . . . .mammoths roamed america not so long ago
Ralokone 6 months ago
@akichita87 whatever the truth . . . .ti seems to be far more interesting than what was previously though
Ralokone 6 months ago
@akichita87 "Luzia Woman" was a big lie by a Brazilian anthropologist, who later accepted the similarity between "Luzia" and the "Botocudos" of Brazil. What do you expect from an anthropologist who only sees white and black people! He didn't even know the characteristics of the Native People of Brazil. He only accepted his error after 3 anthropologist put him in his place (Rolando Gonzalez-Jose, Frank Williams and William Armelagos). Afrocentrics till this day take his lie, seriously!
NativeWarriorXib 4 months ago
@akichita87 Native Americans didn't come to the new world as negroids. That's the dumbest thing I've ever read.
Luigi84289 3 months ago
@akichita87 People don't completely change race in 6500 years.
Luigi84289 3 months ago
@Luigi84289 I am not sure what you're stance is on this subject, but there are multiple theories. Do you believe in the multiple migration theory, the Solutrean Connection theory, Clovis First, etc...? I believe in the traditional model that there was a single migration of Siberian peoples and that the morphological differences between ancient and modern Amerindians can be explained by severe environmental factors, genetic drift, bottle neck, and isolation.
akichita87 3 months ago
i have walk in the foot prints of my people in stone we have always been here ( tsa la gi a ni wo di )
runingblackbear 1 year ago
Kennewick Man - Clovis/Solutrean - Haplogroup X
/watch?v=lIkkA8STBDI
3:00-4:00
sophiah88 1 year ago
Kinnewick Man. Clovis People. Clovis (radiocarbon dated between 11,600-11,000 years before the present), Folsom (10,800-10,000 years BP), Portales (9,800-8,000 years BP), and Archaic (7,000-5,000 years BP) period occupations.
the latest studies show that the ice-free corridor didn't exist until around 12,000 years ago - too late to have served as the route for the very first people to come to America.
rense. com/general59/frist. htm
sophiah88 1 year ago
@sophiah88
a rock overhang in Pennsylvania called Meadowcroft, where a 30-year campaign of excavation suggests that hunters may have reached the Northeast 3,000 or 4,000 years before the Clovis era.
Instead of a single leaf-shaped Clovis spearhead, ice age Siberian hunters made projectiles that were bristling with rows of tiny razor-like blades embedded in wooden shafts. that meant no Siberian hunters armed with Clovis technology had walked to the Americas.
rense. com/general59/frist. htm
sophiah88 1 year ago
this is not true at all bullshit. the mexicans are native here we are the maya
MrPa1310 1 year ago
mexicans? fucking idiot, their were no mexicans or mayans here before the solutreans and when there was, they didn't even exist in N.A.
TheNewMusicNetwork 1 year ago 2
@TheNewMusicNetwork you're fucking idiot were indigenous to this continent !
MrPa1310 1 year ago
@TheNewMusicNetwork
You missed the point of my arguement. If haplogroups A and B are the most common haplogroups among Native North Americans, then why are they both almost nonexistent in Chinese, Mongolian, and Japanese peoples? It shouldn't be suprising that a haplogroup like X, went missing among Siberian peoples, like A and B did.
akichita87 1 year ago
Comment removed
brian8793 1 year ago
the MTDNA is haplogroup X which is primarely european dna not asiatic.
case closed
TheNewMusicNetwork 1 year ago
@TheNewMusicNetwork
The case isn't closed on this yet. Just because haplogroup X is found in Americas and in Europe that doesn't mean that Europeans crossed the Atlantic. First of all, haplogroup X is rare everywhere. Its rare in Europeans, and its rare in Amerindians. It has been found among Asian peoples, in particular Altaic peoples. Haplogroup A is the most common haplogroup among Native North Americans, yet it is rare among Siberian peoples such as the Mongolians and the Chinese.
akichita87 1 year ago
@akichita87 Geeee why do you think it's rare in asians????? Because those that came over wiped out or took solutrean slaves.
Funny how it's quite common in modern day europeans.
TheNewMusicNetwork 1 year ago
First skull. Look at the eye sockets lower outside corners. That is the zygomatic bones. Notice the rim is tilted forward. That is the Native American feature which caucasians do not have. Notice the lower jaw is semicircular and not narrow. This also is a Native American feature. This is a Native American skull
hunt458 1 year ago
@hunt458 oh yes, and we should just ignore the tons of scientific studies proving it is caucosoid and go with you. Um, no.
princessjw1977 1 year ago
@princessjw1977
Yes, the evidence exists that Paleoamericans had a caucasoid morphology, that doesn't mean that Europeans crossed over the Atlantic. What people don't get is that the Mongoloid morphology, the trait that East Asian and Native American peoples exhibit, is very young compared to the other two human morphologies, Caucasoid and Negroid. The earliest Americans, known as Paleoamericans, were the Proto-Mongoloid peoples of todays American Indian and Asian peoples.
akichita87 11 months ago
Paleoamericans (i.e. Penon woman, kennewick man) are the ancestors of modern Native Americans. DNA studies have proven this already. The haplogroup x found in amerindians is also found to be ancestral among siberian peoples in Central Asia, indians brought X into America themselves. The earliest Mongoloid peoples are found in North America, not Asia, suggesting an origin in America, and an ancestral/descendant relationship between Paleoamericans and modern Amerindians.
akichita87 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This theory explains why we find bloodgroup A in the native population of North America....In South America it's 100(!)% bloodgroup 0 .The two parts of America discovered from different people.......The north from ice-specialized hunters from Siberia and Europe and the south from an other asian population.....
xx2icyxx 1 year ago
This theory explains why we find in bloodgroup in the native population of North America....In South America it's 100(!)% bloodgroup 0 .The two parts of America discovered from different people.......The north from ice-specialized hunters from Siberia and Europe and the south from an other asian population.....
xx2icyxx 1 year ago
"That's why now you're going back to this hubby-dubby 'we are all one,' nonsense."
"We are all one" is not hubby dubby! What blood type are you? BLUE!
cutejoker69 1 year ago
TY for agreeing with me!
Blacks and whites are not different species. Blacks and whites can breed new HomoSapien Sapiens, FACT!
cutejoker69 1 year ago
The German Phallus (photo)was found in same area cave as Lion man& Waterbird & dated to 30,000 bce. Lion man & Water Bird found on many artifacts in West Virginia.Water Bird is the symbol that is same as the Phallus symbol on this WV artifact.
The Lion Man and Water Bird are the oldest sculptured artifacts in the world accepted by established archaeology.
These same symbols can be found on the West Virginia artifacts many times they are the main symbols most often seen.
pangeawv. com/
sophiah88 1 year ago
Yeah, but you know why they didn't survive?
They had little dicks and weak sperm! Evolution wins again.
cutejoker69 1 year ago
@cutejoker69
So I guess that's why the Europeans were also able to dominate every single country in Africa and reach the apex of civilization while Africans continued to swing off jungle vines?
That's evolution too, right?
Reazzurro90 1 year ago
@Reazzurro90
There is only one Human race Homo Sapien Sapiens.
cutejoker69 1 year ago
@cutejoker69
Apparently you've never taken Anthropology. Homo Sapien is a species, not a race.
Reazzurro90 1 year ago
@Reazzurro90
Most bigots disagree but the scientific community agrees, there is only one human race. IDC if you don't believe me. My family goes back millions of years, my grandma was Lucy, she was not Homo Sapien Sapien she was Australopithecus afarensis.
I know times are hard and you're probably struggling financially, economically, and with family but Don't let hate, get the best of you. Blacks and whites are not different species. Blacks and whites can breed new HomoSapien Sapiens, FACT!
cutejoker69 1 year ago
@cutejoker69
But what I said was absolutely true, wasn't it? That's why now you're going back to this hubby-dubby 'we are all one,' nonsense.
At any rate, the fact that Whites and Blacks can procreate together makes them a single species, not a single race.
Anthropology 101 dear.
Reazzurro90 1 year ago
@Reazzurro90
Let me correct myself
Most bigots disagree but the scientific community agrees, there is only one human (((((Species))))). IDC if you don't believe me. My family goes back millions of years, my grandma was Lucy, she was not Homo Sapien Sapien she was Australopithecus afarensis.
cutejoker69 1 year ago
I'll reiterate my earlier posts. Pinon woman is not the oldest remain in the americas. Several others, such as Santa Lagao (SR-1) man and Luzia (woman) date from 12,700-13,400 y.o. These two were negroid in cranial morphology (i.e. Melanasian). Also, Pinon woman, and others like her were most likely close relatives of Polynesians. Recent mtDNA evidence suggests that modern Amerindians are descendents of these early peoples, because mtDNA of these early remains have shown haplos B, C, and D.
akichita87 1 year ago
..I HEARD AN OLD INDIAN MAN ONCE REPLY TO A QUESTION..."OLD INDIAN MAN YOU HAVE BEEN ALIVE FOR 90 YEARS AND SEEN THE ADVANCES AND TECHNOLOGY WHITE MAN HAS MADE WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT?"...INDIAN MAN SAID:"B4 WHITE MAN CAME HERE, THERE WERE PLEANTY OF BUFFALO AND BEAVERS.ETC..CLEAN RIVER WATER...WOMEN DO ALL WORK WHILE MAN HUNTS AND FISHES ALL DAY AND HAS SEX ALL NIGHT.ONLY WHITE MAN IS STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK HE CAN IMPROVE THE SYSTEM"..LOL
thiizzman510 1 year ago
@ViolentVikingStorm If you want watch David Wilcock of Project Camelot. He doesn't buy the out of Africa Theory and he teaches that the White Race was the last race put here by Aliens, and he also teaches that this Earth only produced Black People, all the other races came from other planets. He says where all human, I don't buy his teaching, but my research shows 8000 BCE for whites and 6000 BCE for Asians from Natural and Sexual Selection. He puts the reverse dates for their arrival.
divp169 1 year ago
@ViolentVikingStorm took it, but that was then. If you guys grow out of your need to control everything, I'm sure the world will share it's resources with you, ask the Church Missionaries at that time how peacefully the natives American and Africans where before Columbus, that book is called The Story of Civilization, check Vol. 6. I actually think some Europeans must have crossed the ocean before Columbus, just as long as they don't use the concept as a way of excusing how horrible America was.
divp169 1 year ago
@ViolentVikingStorm I'm not saying that's all you guys do, but this is why you guys rule the world. Read "Guns Germs and Steel", and then Read "Black Athena", and while your at it Read "The Peoples History of the United States. If you want my opinion on why Rich whites lie to everybody, it's so we don't realize that South America and Africa have all the resources and if left alone would naturally be the riches continents. I understand that the Vikings are born in Ice and didn't have food so they
divp169 1 year ago
@ViolentVikingStorm 5th. Did the colonizers from Europe report meeting white Tribes or did they report meeting people that where cooper color? And finally, even if white people where the 1st on the continent it wouldn't excuse all the horrible things they did. History is written by the winners, so we know we don't have all the facts on the past. The rich whites lie to their "own" people so you guys will side with them, when you should've side with us. Whites are advance in War, not Civilization.
divp169 1 year ago
@ViolentVikingStrom, A Jaw bone, let me know when they find a full skeleton. Have you ever hear of Piltdown man it was a hoax, google it. 2nd. Watch DNA proves Chinese are from Africa. 3rd. Watch Tim Wise On White Privilege (Clip), Racism isn't an accident of man, it was created. Herodotus a Greek Historian in about 400 BCE says that Ethiopian men are the best looking, just his opinion, but proof people don't automatically hate each other for looking different. 4th. WatchThe First Europeans.
divp169 1 year ago
Who gives a fuck? We're all sheeple.
HigherPlanes 1 year ago
nice conspiracy theory i also like the argument backed up by, the media cover up. funny and uninteresting
xodiachild 1 year ago
awesome conspiracy theory
xodiachild 1 year ago
White skin appears in 8,000 BCE, Asian Skin appears in 6,000 BCE. Look it up. SOY Ketia's Oxnard lecture (search on you tube) shows that a "Cascasian skull found in Africa in 60,000 BCE, was actually not European as we say, because that's 10,000 yrs before they left Africa. In other words bone can't tell you what color a person was. The first people everywhere where Black African, skin color adaptation hit 8000 BCE and then with mixing and migrating Asian Skin appears 2000 years later.
divp169 1 year ago
@divp169 Check out this video. "Out of africa theory going down the tubes on you tube" Pretty good evidence on debunking your so called Out of Africa theory which doesn't make a bit of sense. Also, Kennewick man is white and thats exactly why The Umatilla, who have taken the lead on the issue, intend immediate reburial in a secret location. The remains now lie in a federal repository awaiting resolution. The fucking Indians sued because they know it was a white person and they want to hide it.
ViolentVikingStrom 1 year ago
Interested video
Thanks for sharing thumbs up
MRignorantkiller 1 year ago 2
Just too bad color separates any people that were here first. We're related to anyone and everyone who came over first or last whether people here like it or not.
kittycorp 1 year ago
@kittycorp
Thanks for the input, however, I must disagree with you about haplogroup x not being found in Siberia. "More recently, haplogroups A, B, C, D, and X..., have all been reported in an Altai population from southern Siberia (Derenko et al. 2001), where archaelogical sites dating to at least 20,000 yr B.P. are found (Goebel 1999)." (mitochondrial dna haplogroups of Paleoamericans in North America, circa 2005).
akichita87 1 year ago
this is white brainwashing, first they kill indians, take the land now they want to take our identity. europeans are filthy pagan baarbarians, the only place they can call home is EUROPE where they aktually have a birthright. Kennick man and other so called white skulls is scientific racism at its best. Indians OWN this entire hemisphere and we will take back my land and finlly put u white savages in ur place. This is NOT ur land.
lndianer 1 year ago
@lndianer See it for yourself @ Clovis People Not First Americans, Study Shows
b0rnt0shine 1 year ago 4
sounds like a lame excuse for white people to say they were here first....get off my fuckin land whitey...native pride!!
thiizzman510 1 year ago
@thiizzman510
As a Native American myself, I'd have to say that you are not representing native peoples in a positive way. There is no need for racial smearing. You end up sounding no better off than a white supremist.
akichita87 1 year ago
@akichita87 ummm ok well while our mother(earth) is being raped...what do u want us to do about it???im over here tryin to start a revolution u over here fuckin it up...now kick rocks...ive been raped of my culture and language..and i see other cultures have theirs...so suck a fuckn dick..watch a cowboy movie and see how they talk about us
thiizzman510 1 year ago
@thiizzman510 i agree...history is "his-story" and can not be proven entirely, and notice at the end they said migrations...if you migrating their is no permanent spot...but some not all white only want to hear what they want and therefore they pay a lot of money for mock research to prove that they are better than any other culture...funny they never get the hint know one cares
TaureanRuler 1 year ago
This is so funny its sick...
Genoside5 1 year ago
The Ainu Indigenous people of Japan are not Caucasian?
DarkAngelrace 1 year ago
@DarkAngelrace
No, the Ainu are not Caucasian, they don't even share similar haplotypes. In fact, modern American Indians are more closely related to Caucasians than Caucasians are to ancient south east Asians. Crazy huh?
Also, Penon woman is not the oldest remain found in the Americas. Luzia and Santana do Riacho I (SR-I) are two remains dated at 12,600 and 13,400 years old. They were found in South America, and have been found to resemble Australian Aboriginees and Africans.
akichita87 1 year ago
@akichita87 Yea I know the Ainu aren't Caucasian. I meant like I was questioning this video's false information. Wow, well that really makes this video invalid then! ;] Either way, what matters is that the Natives established themselves on this landmass, and quite a few created sophisticated societies, were those ancient Siberians were the 1st ones to cross or not...
DarkAngelrace 1 year ago
@akichita87 Thanks for providing truth to these comments..
Genoside5 1 year ago
Comment removed
shitonMOHAMMAD 1 year ago
This is a fucking lie!
Genoside5 1 year ago
@Genoside5
Nope. Not a lie. Sorry.
JohnnyK98k 1 year ago
@JohnnyK98k Yes it is a lie. Know your history this is bullshit. Why do you think a computer is doing the talking. Im sure Caucasians would like to feel like they where on this EARTH 1st but they where NOT! The whole world knows this.
Genoside5 1 year ago
@Genoside5
Incorrect. Many anthropologists and scientist know this as a fact. It is taught in Universities and schools everywhere in the world. It's even shown on TV on channels like discovery:
watch?v=a2OIfcA6hWw
Or, read it in a book... The truth is, you're denying facts. You don't want to believe that Europeans did in fact come to the Americas first. Are you jealous? You shouldn't be. If you are, thats quite sad. Continue living your life blind folded. :)
JohnnyK98k 1 year ago
@JohnnyK98k
True. But there are many more paleo-anthropologists, archeaologists, and historians that disagree with this theory. The idea that the Solutreans influenced Clovis spear point technology is, in the words of the U.S.s' leading expert in Solutrean culture, Lawrence Straus, "ludicrous". "The first problem is that Clovis began no earlier than 13,500 years ago, whereas the Solutrean ended by 19,700." (Dr. James Chatter, Ancient Encounters, p. 261).
akichita87 1 year ago
@JohnnyK98k
Most anthropologists and geneticists agree that these early peoples, known as Paleo-Americans, were decendents of people related to the Polynesians and Australian Aboriginees.
akichita87 1 year ago
Comment removed
shitonMOHAMMAD 1 year ago
@Genoside5
somebody's JEALOUS!!!
that's why you red indians are trying so desperately to sue the scientists who want to do DNA studies and halt the process that's already begun and shown that neither the morphology nor the skull shapes belong to you Siberian invaders. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Ultimate FAIL
shitonMOHAMMAD 1 year ago
@shitonMOHAMMAD
DNA studies have been conducted on several Paleo-Americans throughout the Americas, none of them showing a strong relationship to European ancestery. In the words of Dr. James Chatters, he said that DNA has been successfully extracted from at least a dozen Paleo-Am. from North America, showing haplogroup B, C, and D (paraphrased from Ancient Encounters).
akichita87 1 year ago
@akichita87
WRONG! Haplogroups A, B and C are found in modern American Indians, and are comparable to those of North East Asians (AKA Orientals) and yet Haplogroup X, which constitutes over 25% of the genetic make up of the Great Lakes Indians is purely Europeans. RACIST! LIAR~!
shitonMOHAMMAD 1 year ago
@shitonMOHAMMAD
Second of all, the only haplogroup that even remotely ties Europe to America is X, which geneticists have already found to have originated in Central Asia. Also, X is found in the Altai region among Mongoloid peoples.
And who are you to call me racist? You hypocrite. All I am doing is presenting the truth. On the contrary, it seems like people like you are so desperate to try and prove that whites are the master race, and everybody should accept it.
akichita87 1 year ago
@akichita87
if you had done any research, you would also know that the original people of Central Asia (AKA Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan etc...) where WHITE, Caucasian people. The area didn't receive an influx of Mongoloid blood until the 5th-6th centuries when Turks and various Altaic people came from Mongolia and either killed or absorbed, earlier Iraniac speaking populations of Khwarazmians, Sarmatians, Kushans, Scythians etc...
Thus WRONG and I leave that master race to a RACIST LIKE YOU!
shitonMOHAMMAD 1 year ago
@shitonMOHAMMAD
In conclusion, I have to say that Europeans have a beautiful culture. I don't see why you, and others like you, are trying to step on everybody else's culture in order to prove it.
akichita87 1 year ago
@akichita87
blowing smoke up people's ass won't hid ethe fact that you're an obious RACIST, you have proven it on countless forums already
shitonMOHAMMAD 1 year ago
@shitonMOHAMMAD
So, I guess my sources are RACIST too, huh?
Haplogroup X did not originate among the people of Kazakhstan, and the other aforemention groups. The timeline for the divergence of X is several of thousands of years older than the modern Caucasian complex. You have no scientifict backing in trying to assert that it originated among Caucasians.
akichita87 1 year ago
@shitonMOHAMMAD
"More recently, haplogroups A, B, C, D, and X... have all been reported in an Altai population from southern Siberia (Derenko, 2001), where archaelogical sites dating to at least 20,000 yr B.P. are found. The ancestors of this population represent the only known surviving... source for peopling of the New World via a single migration. The region of southern Siberia, the hypothesized origin location of two of the most common Native American Y-chromosome haplotypes."
akichita87 1 year ago
@akichita87 Some of your info is off. X is not found in Siberia. it is found with Semitic people. Also the majority of the mongol gene pool is found in South America, not North America with no actual evidence of any land bridge. This has always been only theory. We do, however, have evidence of great sailing nations in ancient history:)
kittycorp 1 year ago
@shitonMOHAMMAD
"...the origin of two of the most common Native Am. Y-chrom. haplotypes, might have provided the staging point for both the migration that introduced all five haplogroups into the Americas and haplogroups A, C, and D into eastern Siberia."
"The present study provides no support for the hypotheses that the first Americans (Paleoamericans) were not the direct ancestors of modern Native Americans" (David Smith, Ripan Malhi, Jason Eshlemah, Fredericka Kaestle, Brian Kemp, 2005)
akichita87 1 year ago
F.Y.I. Solutrean culture ended around 15,000 years ago, Clovis culture began no earlier than 8,000 years ago. Second, Clovis is not the oldest culture in the Americas. Third, the oldest remains are found in S. America and resemble African and Aboriginee peoples (i.e. Luzia, 13,000 yrs old). Fourth, DNA testing has been conducted on both North and South Paleo-Americans, revealing haplogroups B,C, D, and N (which are not European, but S.E. Asian). Fifth, haplo B, C, and D exist in Amerindians.
akichita87 1 year ago
Ancient Egyptians were Aryan
RedFishBlooFish 1 year ago
Its interesting that when an ancient skeleton that resembles Polynesians is found, the white supremists jump on it to add fuel to their ethnocentrism. Why don't we see as much hype about the fact that the ancient remains found in south america (which are much older than those found in North America) closely resemble Australian Aboriginees and African peoples?
akichita87 1 year ago
@akichita87 because they dont.if your talking about luzia then thats been debunked
thunderheart226 1 year ago
@thunderheart226
Bull S***. From the 40 or so Paleo. South Am skulls studied by anthropologists James Chatters and Walter Neves, they agree that Paleo-S Americans are morphologically similar to Africans and Aboriginees. Source: Ancient Encounters by James C. Chatters.
akichita87 1 year ago
@akichita87 nope ,uzia had been debunked they were paleo indians Botocudo afro clowns love to claim they were black but that just isnt true.ill send you a link as a pm ok..she is not even the oldest skull anymore =]
thunderheart226 1 year ago
THE NATIVE AMERICANS CAME HERE THOUSANDS OF YEARS B4 THE THE WHITES .
YoungOmega17 1 year ago
@YoungOmega17 Get educated asshole
redwhitebluefu 1 year ago
It appears we were here first!
crypter27 1 year ago
@crypter27 NOT..NATIVE INDIANS WERE HERE....LOL..U FUCKIN LOOOZER
thiizzman510 1 year ago
@crypter27 THIS IS SO FAKE
thiizzman510 1 year ago
@crypter27 WRONG New radiocarbon dating of Clovis-culture materials shows that this group inhabited the Americas a little later and for a shorter period of time than previously believed. Archaeological evidence of human occupation in South America also dates to the same time as the Clovis-culture materials. This suggests that people were living in the Americas before the Clovis people arrived.
b0rnt0shine 1 year ago 3
@crypter27 See it for yourself @ Clovis People Not First Americans, Study Shows
b0rnt0shine 1 year ago 3
@b0rnt0shine I agree
crypter27 1 year ago 10
@crypter27 I appericaite a VOTE UP ;)
b0rnt0shine 1 year ago 2
@crypter27 and if your interested in this history you will be called a white supremists...apparantly your also a white supremist if you think it is unfair that your paying taxes so other people don't have to because they are supposedly the first people here...you can't want to know your history or hey your a white supremist....heck if your proud of anything to do with your race your a white supremist...and well it is perfectly ok to call you a cracker too!
lucy9359 9 months ago
@lucy9359 So your'e a white supremists if you think the income tax & the welfare state is unconstitutional & your'e a white supremist if the facts support a politically inceorrect truth you know how stupid that sounds?
crypter27 9 months ago
Comment removed
lucy9359 9 months ago
@lucy9359 Sorry its hard to detect sarcasm on a comment section,I'm glad you agree!
crypter27 9 months ago
@lucy9359 you fucks dont belong here go back to Europe us mexicans are native here we were allways here
MrPa1310 8 months ago
@MrPa1310 If that is how you feel then I suggest you go and have DNA profiling done and prove you only have Mexican blood and absolutely no Spanish in you what so ever or your disqualified like 90% of you...Oh ya and after that you may need to go back to Asia or over your Mongolion blood...other wise were staying!
lucy9359 8 months ago
@lucy9359 oh but wait se i thought mongolions were from asain, arent they asain natives hahaha. you fucking idiot. im native American with little spanish blood which im ok with i love my spanish people. but hey, i born on native land with native people with native blood. what do you got to say about that. wannabe. i choose what i wanna be labeled as and i say im native American as my race but as my culture and nationality im mexican and spanish and im proud.
MrPa1310 8 months ago
@MrPa1310 a wanna be what? I don't get it why would I be any less than happy to be exactly who I am? I have a job I love I married a man who is kind to me I have 3 beautiful daughters...I live in a safe neighbourhood in Canada with towering pine trees to look out my window at walking trails in my back yard...I wake up to birds singing every morning...I have a lot to be thankful for I am not wanna be anything...I thank God each day for the life he gave me...I am blessed!
lucy9359 8 months ago
@lucy9359 sounds like you have a great life. i did not know that. i did not know that married moms have youtube accounts or i would of been more respectful.
MrPa1310 8 months ago
@MrPa1310 well I have it for work because I am a researcher...and on that note...I thank you for deciding to be respectful...may I suggest however that you do that any way in light of the young single woman who are on here...It is a great thing to show them respect also...I wouldn't have liked being swore at when I was 20 any more than I do at 40 and I think most people in general prefer not to be swore at or called names!
lucy9359 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
for monitoring racial affinity in terms of likely migration especially in certain lineages geoclimatic order: A, B, C and D are distinguished by mitochondrial DNA mutations that originally occurred in Asian descent and she has "a" which indicates its origin Asia.
exupipus 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
White?lol....
watch?v=pbuqe3_gg mc&playnext=1&videos=o5FsYDI5S F0
1.MAN OF TULUM (mexico): Overtaken by the man almost: 13,600 years.
2.Women of the peñon de los BAÑOS: 12700 years.
exupipus 1 year ago
this just tells me that these people came from europe and they became native americans just like some of the people came from asia and became native american
CHIEF18800 1 year ago
There is even more evidence that the first Europeans were Native Americans. (Basque/Razna/Illyric)The first Caucasians in Europe (Hellenic/Latin/Celtic)merely 7000 years ago. The remains found at Medowcroft, PA are without doubt Native American and are 16,000 years old. Amerind remains 43,000 years old have been found in Brazil, new finds in Chile and Bolivia are even older. (before Caucasians existed). The Ainu are descended from the Dogon people NOT Caucasians!
sawokli7 1 year ago
THIS IS FAKE ONLY THE FIRST PEOPLE IN AMERICA WHERE THE NATIVE AMERICANS THATS WHY THEIR CALLED NATIVE AMERICANS!!!
tekkentoni18 1 year ago
@tekkentoni18 haha really who cares if europeans came to it first. we were the first to permanently settle it.
bloodynachos 1 year ago
@tekkentoni18 Funny how you call Them "native" it is accepted fact that indians came from mongolia over the berring land bridge so the are NOT "native" to north america. Looks like the term "first nations" is also a lie by these mogols that claim to be something they are not !
bigrigbob2010 1 year ago
@bigrigbob2010 It is also accepted fact that Europeans came from Africa if you go back far enough. So why do we call them "Native" to Europe? Native Americans are "native" to North America because they were the FIRST humans to inhabit the lands and did so for such a long time that they physically adapted to the environment just as Europeans adapted to theirs (White skin, light hair, etc..) Native Americans are not "mongols" you ignorant.
xm377Moyocoyatzin 1 year ago
We want our land back from these dirty spics!
Tremleypt 1 year ago
@Tremleypt Hey,fk you.You have no lands ck sucker. Your should of died from disease you filthy dirty bastard,
dad2ujunior 1 year ago
@BetterThanUForSure No none of you are indigenous. You ALL came across the Imakpik at one time or another. EVERY "NATIVE RACE" isn't native at all.
CTastic1 1 year ago
@CTastic1: Well, I guess if that's the case, then nobody can claim to be indigenous anywhere. Right?
SixtiesFan90 1 year ago
@SixtiesFan90 Wrong again. There are only three races in the world. Caucasians are indigenous to the American Continent, Japan, France, Spain. Mongoloids are indigenous to Russia, Asia Turkey, Greece. Negroids are indigenous to Africa.
CTastic1 1 year ago
@CTastic1: I was being sarcastic, bud{Seriously, did you not get this?}. And Japanese being of Caucasian extraction? Now where you did get that from?
SixtiesFan90 1 year ago