People that criticize something just for their own perverse pleasure are just an insignificant fact of society. They are to society what waste product is to the human body. Just try to not let any stick to you! :) and ignore the rest.
@den2003 lol you make it sound like Wankel invented the eccentric shaft. The eccentric shaft was probably invented shortly after someone decided they needed to combine a wheel and leverage. Assuming leverage was discovered before the wheel (since it is a more basic concept) I can conclude that the eccentric shaft was invented shortly,in the grander scheme, after the wheel. The Wankel rotary engine began life as simply a rotary pump. It was then modified to pump air and fuel instead of water.
The previous comment was not meant to detract from the accomplishments involved with the design and ultimate function of this engine. This type of engine has been designed for years with varying degrees of success (mostly the lack there of). I commend you on your ability to implement modern materials and manufacturing processes to make it functional. just an Idea: ceramic coating the rotor circumference, and exposure porting for maximum exposure beyond desired phase initiation.
attn: TheCummuted - it's not advised to run any type of fuel other than 1.Hydrocarbon 2. Methanol or 3. Ethanol based fuels because the excess water production involved would rapidly deteriorate the carbon based internals. The wear issue is the main contributing factor to these engines not being used in the consumer market. The lifespan of the internal sealing/mating surfaces does not permit extended operating times, thereby causing decreased compression, phase isolation, and many others.
@TheCommuted that may be true but there is still no2 or NO as a byproduct but i think someone shold make a catalist that can breakdown the other byproducts and recyle them into a tank of water to create a liquid exaust where it can be treated: ie for normal petrol cars get me
Great idea and really nice fabrication! I have always thought that this, or something similar, could be done. It's nuts to have pistons changing directions when you can have something like THIS- Awesome!
Please ignore the doofuses who make snide comments here. You might be onto something big.
Have you considered using a rotor that's not round? This would reduce the acceleration rates of that sliding valve (similar to what high performance camshaft makers do, to reduce acceleration damage). In addition, the housing might also be non-round just after the sliding valve, to make a 'squish' area to improve combustion.
Really nice work! You obviously have a lot of thought time and money in this project! Have you considered adding a faster burning fuel like hho gas to get cleaner faster burn?
it wont work at high rpms becaue you would need a stronger spring so the real problem would be spring constant vs rpm and of course use calc to optimize but good idea needs a large improvement maybe for generators in poor countries you sould put use to that cheep motors :)
@th3dig1tal0n3 exactly. Reciprocating engines have their problems, but they do have the advantage of being a positive displacement pump. All of these rotary designs rely on surface reactions of the pressure and high velocity flow rates to work. Now it's great for power density, but very poor for efficiency. Wankel type rotaries suffer for this reason.
@Polybun I believe engines with external combustion chambers are the road to efficiency. This design might be low on torque, but is prime candidate for external combustion chamber rotary hybrid. I believe simplicity and high power density will be the prime mover towards enhancing this design.
Very interesting. Surely the Mazda rotary issue of economy still hampers this project like anything with a port transfer system ie 2 stroke bikes? Great to see someone design and build something new. How is the wear for the graphite vane seals? Love the ability to switch them as needed too. And to all the negative comments- put up or shut up losers. Whadda you built??!!
To all you knockers! What have you ever developed ?? Bugger all I'll bet ! Big with the mouth aint you? If you haven't got anything good to say about some one trying to improve tings keep your Fucking big mouths shut! Ass holes!!!
nice work dude thumbs up.. its just has an unfortunate simularity to a queef...sorry had to bring that up have you cosidered a ethenol fuel you get extra funding from the alternative fuel sector.................. keep up the good ideas the world will be better for it
this looks/ acts like the engine angelo di pietro designs (engineair pty ltd). except that his has multiple uhm.. fingers. or vanes. whatchamacallit. im not an engineer. but yeah.
I love the simplicity of the design but worry how its lopsidedness will perform with extremely high rpms. Have you considered using steam power instead? Steam offers high torque with low rpm, as well as far more flexibilty in terms of which fuel is used. Cheers.
@Fenrisulfir - I think some people have already adapted the GPL to open source hardware, maybe he should see what the BeagleBoard or Arduino guys did.
it not exactly the same as a rotory because it runs in a cylindrical bore,a rotor has aoffset rounded triangle shaped rotor and automatically seals combusts then pushes burnt gas through the exhaust port.i think i have a better idea if i can find the right fluid/gas that doesnt include burning.
Ok,, Soo This is No Longer The Triangle Rotor,, But Circle in A Cicular Engine,,, HOW EFFICIENT IS IT< In Contrast To The Triangular Rotor Engine?, :?
Hit n miss engines did the same thing when they did not need to fire. A true hit n miss held the exhaust valve open and only closed it when it needed to fire, however under load the engine would fire more consistently. As a result the engines were light on fuel consumption. (2:04 to 2:18) I like the idea and commend you for trying and succeeding.
That sounds REAL intimidating. They must've used sound dubbing or something, cuz the RX-7 Vin Diesel drove did not sound like that rotary queef going on there. HAHA!!! xD
Any ICE is going to suffer from the same thermal in eff. Find a way to use the energy from the hot exhaust gasses. That is where most of the eff looses are taking place.
excellent design prototype.very easy to balance and seal.i think it might need forced induction to get air to go in or the direct injection of oxygen and fuel.the only issue it might have is thermal efficiency if the mixture is not compressed this might create more heat than momentum but this will definitely work one day
I hate to pour cold water on your ideas but the technology to replace the internal combustion engine has already been implimented in the form of hybrid cars it is only a matter of time before cars like the "lightning GT"(a full electric that can charge in the time it takes to sip a cup of coffie, and costs peneys operate) completely take over the market!!!
I don't know where you're getting your information, but it doesn't correspond well with the reality of EV technology. Here's an example for you, Raser Technology touted a 100 MPG Hummer. However, it takes 100kWh of power to recharge this (3X that it takes to run your house). So when the equivalent cost of this energy is considered, the Hummer gets 8.7 MPG. BTW, their hybrid ICE provides only half the power that they need.
Oh please. If you'd like to remove the electrodes from your rod for a moment, you can see a much better ICE at mce-5 . com
This is only ONE of the top 50+ exciting ICE technologies in current development. You may also want to google Scuderi to see another that's been in development for many years. It has some interesting tech, but will never be practical in my opinion.
it would appear to suffer from the same problem as all other rotary type internal combustion engines and that would be the seal. when viewed in two dimensions the seal doesn't appear to be all that great and when viewed in three dimensions the seal is much worse, the more you try to fix the seal the more friction becomes a factor which is exactly why rotary engines never got put into common use but for those of you who like them Norton is making a rotary engine motorcycle that might intrigue you
@runescapeownsnubs so your saying Rx-7 is powerless? Hey buddy i am done with college already and ive had 3 cars and a gsxr, so don't tell me what I do and don't know.. your probally atleast 10 years old who plays runescape still.
and yes I played runescape before (In second grade)
I have an RX-7 with a 13b and it has so much power, i never said an rx7 is powerless, i'm saying this model is powerless it does like 1rpm and is pretty much useless for anything. it might be able to blow some bubbles, and i'm not meaning to offend anyone
Actually, the Wenkel is massively more complicated, as it also incorporated some aspects of a reciprocating mechanism, as opposed to this design which is purely a rotating piston.
When I was in high school my power tech teacher had a model of a rotary engine. That was the coolest thing I ever seen! Even how they worked. Didn't Mazda put rotary engines in their cars?
(1)the rotary engine-complet and ready for production.
(2)Cleaning machine for cleaning the engines from inside.
(3)the magical glass of shading (for cars and buildings).
(4)the replacement for the cam-shaft system in the engines So,any body who wishes to by one or more of these inventions,for the aim of producing it or them for the welfwre oof all huminity,not only for profit, individually or companies,from any spot of this planet,,let him...
---2--...that there would be prizes and gifts and and and...etc..the story is so long..but to make a long story short:Today I thank my God that I am still alive after a period of time which I was facing death every moment,,,not day,,for years,,
What I want to say here is :this invention is originally mine and it was stolen by Hussain Kamel(son -in -law of Saddam) but the fool stupid men of Saddam sold them(they were 4 ideas) incomplet.Here I am calling anybody who wants to legally buy the ...
I am Amir Toma,a very simple mechanic,at the present time I live in Canada-Ontario-windsor. I worked on the idea of the rotary engine since 1978,and (that was a great mistake then in Iraq)I presented the -incomplete- papers of of the design to the Information Office of the Republican Palace of Saddam Hussain in 1984 according to an advertisement on the T.V.of Baghdad encouraging inventors and designers to present their ideas and innovations,with promises .....
Lol, the timing belt is $40, spending 14 hours to tear appart half the car and put it back together is another $800, that is why people don't replace them. I doubt this will be more efficient than the modern rotary design for whole slew of reasons since it is almost the same design except it has recipricating parts, doesn't use combustion pressure to maintain a seal and has very long sealing paths. I doubt it will maintain power at an efficient rpm for very long. Stated for constructive purposes
Most new ideas go absolutely nowhere, and this one may very well join those ranks. But if we were to let that deter us, then innovation would surely die. Also, this design draws allot from prior art, and it's possible that some future work can in turn benefit from some of these ideas.
Both 2-strokes, and Wankels have higher specific power. This design is all about efficiency, and I expect specific fuel consumption to be second to none once the seals are perfected. Throttle response is excellend due to the unique vane modulation scheme which effectively eliminates throttling. Sound is one measure of engine efficiency. An engine that's expelling hot, loud, high-pressure gasses, is throwing away energy out the exhaust pipe. These models operate without mufflers.
Are you talking polluting efficiency or non polluting/ hehe, piston engines can get up to 3 times the efficiency they do now, if emmissions weren't an issue. The other issue of having a lower specific power is larger engine volume/unit power, not displacement, just package size. Non throttling is good. Seals: a minor sounding issue can become quite the headache. TOTALLY agree on the sound = wasted energy. Thanks for the reply, kudos on the nopatent. Parallels linux :)
Avesome! Thanx for all creative people for supporting evolution of technology. Shame on those people and companys who make it difficoult for them to release their invention to public. Dont give up, youre not alone.
People that criticize something just for their own perverse pleasure are just an insignificant fact of society. They are to society what waste product is to the human body. Just try to not let any stick to you! :) and ignore the rest.
jcisbell 3 weeks ago
@jcisbell very well said.
Elevationary 12 hours ago
Nice machining...
willo996 1 month ago
watch?v=jErlH8odWcw
TheEEEShow 2 months ago
Peak Oil ha ha ha
largespliff 3 months ago
What kind of efficeincy does this engine have? And whats the rev range?
roflolmaogas 4 months ago
This has to be the best Engine i have seen so far with limited Friction.....
Elevationary 4 months ago
Very nice work! The World needs more people like you! Keep up the good work! Well done!
corres78 6 months ago
They sound funny!
MalcomseXatYaMasHous 7 months ago
Great work! Keep it up!
piginasack 8 months ago
Seems like the inventor started with a wankle, then removed the triangles, keeping the eccentric shaft.
den2003 8 months ago
@den2003 lol you make it sound like Wankel invented the eccentric shaft. The eccentric shaft was probably invented shortly after someone decided they needed to combine a wheel and leverage. Assuming leverage was discovered before the wheel (since it is a more basic concept) I can conclude that the eccentric shaft was invented shortly,in the grander scheme, after the wheel. The Wankel rotary engine began life as simply a rotary pump. It was then modified to pump air and fuel instead of water.
JohnxWaynexGacy 6 months ago
Nice
hrflikk 9 months ago
Freaking awesome! I love human potential!
jablonsky67 9 months ago
The previous comment was not meant to detract from the accomplishments involved with the design and ultimate function of this engine. This type of engine has been designed for years with varying degrees of success (mostly the lack there of). I commend you on your ability to implement modern materials and manufacturing processes to make it functional. just an Idea: ceramic coating the rotor circumference, and exposure porting for maximum exposure beyond desired phase initiation.
SirCuddles2006 9 months ago
attn: TheCummuted - it's not advised to run any type of fuel other than 1.Hydrocarbon 2. Methanol or 3. Ethanol based fuels because the excess water production involved would rapidly deteriorate the carbon based internals. The wear issue is the main contributing factor to these engines not being used in the consumer market. The lifespan of the internal sealing/mating surfaces does not permit extended operating times, thereby causing decreased compression, phase isolation, and many others.
SirCuddles2006 9 months ago
Amazing job man,well done.what about a ledge on the rotor to act as a piston top and catch more combustion force?
thenakedangler 10 months ago
If you ran this on ammonia there would be only water vapor as a byproduct. It may need high compression to get the ammonia to ignite.
TheCommuted 10 months ago
@TheCommuted that may be true but there is still no2 or NO as a byproduct but i think someone shold make a catalist that can breakdown the other byproducts and recyle them into a tank of water to create a liquid exaust where it can be treated: ie for normal petrol cars get me
fatqwert200 6 months ago
@fatqwert200 Weight becomes an extreme issue when you're trying to lug gallons of water around.
MrFreemaan 6 months ago
I have one question if you use springs wouldn't that get something live valve float at high rpms?
togo002 10 months ago
i literally lol'd at 0:17
ViolentEncounter 10 months ago
Great idea and really nice fabrication! I have always thought that this, or something similar, could be done. It's nuts to have pistons changing directions when you can have something like THIS- Awesome!
terracer 10 months ago
amazing
great job man i have been designing something like this for ages but i havent actually started work on it yet
so yeah im really impressed
WickedZZzY 10 months ago
i amazed that the one who insulting this beautiful invention is the one who have the most positive rates !!
strange world !!!!
TheGoodInventor 10 months ago
Very nice, but it makes such a funny sound, wobawobawobawobawobaw XD
otoakki 10 months ago
Please ignore the doofuses who make snide comments here. You might be onto something big.
Have you considered using a rotor that's not round? This would reduce the acceleration rates of that sliding valve (similar to what high performance camshaft makers do, to reduce acceleration damage). In addition, the housing might also be non-round just after the sliding valve, to make a 'squish' area to improve combustion.
Don't give up, and please repost your progress.
Jeff
57Fastjeff 10 months ago
I wonder how its going to hold up, it looks like almost the entire engine is a bearing surface.
jrkepler 11 months ago
Do you know the efficiency or friction losses, using compressed air. It looks really good.
Peter
peterno01 11 months ago
WABWABWABWABWABWAB BURP!!!!!!!!!1
TheRealFobican 11 months ago
Really nice work! You obviously have a lot of thought time and money in this project! Have you considered adding a faster burning fuel like hho gas to get cleaner faster burn?
HybridWaterMan2 11 months ago
I find especially the throttling system to be very interesting. And very nice to see in operation as well.
mynith 11 months ago
very nice. and it makes me wonder why we don't put piston-style air compressors on traditional engines. i wish you luck in the future.
jonathanstensberg 11 months ago
Sounds like my '71 Honda CL70 (single piston/70cc) with the exhaust off.
Rangerscott69 1 year ago
0:18 made me lahghf :]
holygroundscoffee 1 year ago
it wont work at high rpms becaue you would need a stronger spring so the real problem would be spring constant vs rpm and of course use calc to optimize but good idea needs a large improvement maybe for generators in poor countries you sould put use to that cheep motors :)
fatqwert200 1 year ago
i like your model engine looks good
crashoveride11 1 year ago
Fascinating concept. Has there been any progress recently?
mguyvig 1 year ago
that was fantastic
good luck
TheGoodInventor 1 year ago
Oh good, another engine with very poor effiency because it relies on indirect transfer of the energy produce during combustion.
Polybun 1 year ago
@Polybun Indirect? Like pressure pushing down on piston?
th3dig1tal0n3 1 year ago
@th3dig1tal0n3 exactly. Reciprocating engines have their problems, but they do have the advantage of being a positive displacement pump. All of these rotary designs rely on surface reactions of the pressure and high velocity flow rates to work. Now it's great for power density, but very poor for efficiency. Wankel type rotaries suffer for this reason.
Polybun 1 year ago
@Polybun I believe engines with external combustion chambers are the road to efficiency. This design might be low on torque, but is prime candidate for external combustion chamber rotary hybrid. I believe simplicity and high power density will be the prime mover towards enhancing this design.
th3dig1tal0n3 1 year ago
but the valve its going to sufer to much wear dont you think?
legendario13 1 year ago
Very interesting. Surely the Mazda rotary issue of economy still hampers this project like anything with a port transfer system ie 2 stroke bikes? Great to see someone design and build something new. How is the wear for the graphite vane seals? Love the ability to switch them as needed too. And to all the negative comments- put up or shut up losers. Whadda you built??!!
fordv8man 1 year ago
To all you knockers! What have you ever developed ?? Bugger all I'll bet ! Big with the mouth aint you? If you haven't got anything good to say about some one trying to improve tings keep your Fucking big mouths shut! Ass holes!!!
brownhole13 1 year ago 45
Who ever is bitching about the sound is stupid as hell it is small version of what it would be if in an actual car.
JMFC04 1 year ago
if cars start sounding like this im just going to kill myself
sqweem 1 year ago
@sqweem
Go on do it !!
brownhole13 1 year ago
nice work dude thumbs up.. its just has an unfortunate simularity to a queef...sorry had to bring that up have you cosidered a ethenol fuel you get extra funding from the alternative fuel sector.................. keep up the good ideas the world will be better for it
Agnola 1 year ago
thaks for sharing this information is been of great help
arturo710 1 year ago
lovely engineering mate , i salute you .
twinman009 1 year ago
this looks/ acts like the engine angelo di pietro designs (engineair pty ltd). except that his has multiple uhm.. fingers. or vanes. whatchamacallit. im not an engineer. but yeah.
thekaizer666 1 year ago
How cool would it be to wind the core with wire and make this a hybrid gas/electric motor with the same driveshaft!
maxneu 1 year ago
@maxneu No
TehRacooonODoom 1 year ago
Great concept. Are you planning to develop this working prototype further?
flyby2300 1 year ago
what kind of equipment would you need to shape thoes metal parts? also what kind of metal would that be made out of?
nohj1000000 1 year ago
good idea
Otaku35 1 year ago
somebody spent alot of time machining that
donwonjon420 1 year ago
I love the simplicity of the design but worry how its lopsidedness will perform with extremely high rpms. Have you considered using steam power instead? Steam offers high torque with low rpm, as well as far more flexibilty in terms of which fuel is used. Cheers.
moobijoo 1 year ago
How's the vibration level at full throttle?
Sealy57 1 year ago
Great Work!
But not to copyright it might be not the best way because anyone can just copyright it.
Maybe you can put it under the GPL (general public licence) so everyone who made further developments has to publish his changes.
The GPL is usually for Software like linux but maybe its adaptable.
Fenrisulfir 1 year ago
@Fenrisulfir - I think some people have already adapted the GPL to open source hardware, maybe he should see what the BeagleBoard or Arduino guys did.
cyborgtroy 1 year ago
that is sweet man! someone could make some major money off those. ive always been a fan of rotarys. therre pretty legit
losiraminator 1 year ago
Is this that MYT engine?
vancouverbluz1 1 year ago
whoever copyrights this will make some big time bank one day lol
Tj1056 1 year ago
So this engine would run on a mixture to provide minimal lubrication?
BNSF5608 1 year ago
it not exactly the same as a rotory because it runs in a cylindrical bore,a rotor has aoffset rounded triangle shaped rotor and automatically seals combusts then pushes burnt gas through the exhaust port.i think i have a better idea if i can find the right fluid/gas that doesnt include burning.
560287144602817 1 year ago
isnt this basically the same as a wankel rotary engine?
MrGingeybabe 1 year ago
Ok,, Soo This is No Longer The Triangle Rotor,, But Circle in A Cicular Engine,,, HOW EFFICIENT IS IT< In Contrast To The Triangular Rotor Engine?, :?
phigo4kins 1 year ago
this is like a rotary compressor
chabbalato 1 year ago
great design, congratulations
freakcoda 1 year ago
sounds like your mom on a lonely night
iroc464 1 year ago
cooling?
dolebanana12 1 year ago 4
awesome!!!
commando7144 1 year ago
I want a car that sounds like that.
shawbros 1 year ago
plututututututoot!
grimnight 1 year ago
Hit n miss engines did the same thing when they did not need to fire. A true hit n miss held the exhaust valve open and only closed it when it needed to fire, however under load the engine would fire more consistently. As a result the engines were light on fuel consumption. (2:04 to 2:18) I like the idea and commend you for trying and succeeding.
weirdmindofesh 1 year ago
That sounds REAL intimidating. They must've used sound dubbing or something, cuz the RX-7 Vin Diesel drove did not sound like that rotary queef going on there. HAHA!!! xD
adamlesh 1 year ago
Is that a shaft from a normal rotary engine.
rainerfilm 1 year ago
Any ICE is going to suffer from the same thermal in eff. Find a way to use the energy from the hot exhaust gasses. That is where most of the eff looses are taking place.
cheerdiver 1 year ago
Beautiful ! Good job !
urosh911 1 year ago
hehe its a block :D
ThomasXp 1 year ago
sounds funny lol
WZW1982 1 year ago
Nice job.
asteen75 1 year ago
Too noisy?...too dirty?...and the valve gear seems to have to much friction?..longevity???
andgate2000 1 year ago
the idea is good, but the valve that divides the combustion and intake area would not be able to take the strain of combustion,
it would definately run smoother than a standard rotary engine.
if its possible to make a different partion that is stronger yet with little friction then this engine would work briliantly :D
wish i had the tools to make my own engine :(
sidewayzskillz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That thing would feel great if you inserted your PENIS into it. :-)
waterfordjim 1 year ago
@waterfordjim
Yeah, give it a go
Stevieboy130664 1 year ago
sounds like a 2 stroke lol
stealthcorvette 1 year ago
Maybe because it ignites every stroke?
jorenvonk 1 year ago
i love the way you expose the combustion using transparent materials ^^
thus i dont really get how that 'valve' works :/
alos i wanna know 'how do you manage to develop those parts?' are you employeed in a research facility or doing it all yourself?
OttomanDrifter91 1 year ago
Tight display rotation man
FilmPA 1 year ago
How much hydrogen does it require to run a small version?
onecraftydude 2 years ago
keep up nthe great work,
google STEORN and check there magnetic moter...
we need yr help working on fuelless engines..
research and see what can u contribute!
animus999 2 years ago
cool cool
keep posting
MRJOSEPHKING1971 2 years ago
excellent design prototype.very easy to balance and seal.i think it might need forced induction to get air to go in or the direct injection of oxygen and fuel.the only issue it might have is thermal efficiency if the mixture is not compressed this might create more heat than momentum but this will definitely work one day
saif1002 2 years ago
the prob with rotary is no torque so you need rpm and there goes your mpg. its a dead horse. kick ass machining and engeneering though.
Aarius1972 2 years ago
I dont know why you got so many thumbs down, you're spot on correct.
gullf1sk 2 years ago
thats pretty neat lil motor
morganman102 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sounds like a wet fart.
xIIIIII1IIIIIIx 2 years ago 80
@xIIIIII1IIIIIIx Between what I heard and what you wrote I almost fell out of my chair and on the floor.
onyxone144 1 year ago
@xIIIIII1IIIIIIx yeah at 0.18
jeppoification 1 year ago
@xIIIIII1IIIIIIx
you are a moron :)
WickedZZzY 10 months ago
The compression ratio is very important.
This engine has a small compression ratio.
Wankel engine, compression is 13 / 1.
Renwysocki 2 years ago
not triangle but do the job no˝piston rings ˝
oksard100 2 years ago
so is that really what it sounds like?
also what is the max RPM it can hit?
oldschoolbugs 2 years ago
Dear oldschool,
This is what it sounds like in this crude
version. RotaryICEman got it this far. He
has put other versions aside for now.
I can guarantee that in it's most perfect
final version, it will produce about 1/3
faster RPM that a two cylinder four stroke.
It will also have a muffler.
Electrorod1 2 years ago
thats cool thanks man
oldschoolbugs 2 years ago
I hate to pour cold water on your ideas but the technology to replace the internal combustion engine has already been implimented in the form of hybrid cars it is only a matter of time before cars like the "lightning GT"(a full electric that can charge in the time it takes to sip a cup of coffie, and costs peneys operate) completely take over the market!!!
madbackyardscientist 2 years ago
I don't know where you're getting your information, but it doesn't correspond well with the reality of EV technology. Here's an example for you, Raser Technology touted a 100 MPG Hummer. However, it takes 100kWh of power to recharge this (3X that it takes to run your house). So when the equivalent cost of this energy is considered, the Hummer gets 8.7 MPG. BTW, their hybrid ICE provides only half the power that they need.
archileach 2 years ago
Well madback. You like cold water, as you
have no hot ideas. A hybrid is 1/2 ICE so
an improvement to it improves hybrids.
There is no such viable technology , such as you speak, and most of the electricity
comes from coal and nukes, costs more
than pennies, can't deliver that much that
quick and no electric power storage device could absorb it that fast, and
what about cost of this GT. I suppose Frankenstien told you this dribble.
Electrorod1 2 years ago
sorry fellows but a guy called Ralph Sarich tried making these in the 70's his company is still going it's called Orbital engine co.
o0LiLSnake0o 2 years ago
ever feel like youve been here before, and right as you figure it out you wake up a baby, it take another 40 years to start again?I do
gonzofann 2 years ago
I think I'm gonna stick with my mechanically fuel injected engine that has grandfather rights.
Sadetree 2 years ago
It will suprise you how simple the problems that this version points out,
can be overcome. It can be sealed
with two small and easy improvements.
This design is not a piston, it is a true
eccentric rotary engine. It lacks the rolling
and sliding action that an advanced version will use, that will put it far ahead of anything out there.
Electrorod1 2 years ago
This is public domain now and can't be patented. It can be improved.
The Bourke is a great concept, This may
prove better.
Beings this is a two stage two lung machine, they balance when set 180 degrees apart.
Electrorod1 2 years ago
Russel Bourke's engine is also public domain technology, and while interesting, their are many better ICEs out there.
archileach 2 years ago
What are the better ICEs out there? You have no clue. You have no facts. You have
a warped imagination, is all. Admit you
read too many comic books.
Electrorod1 2 years ago
Oh please. If you'd like to remove the electrodes from your rod for a moment, you can see a much better ICE at mce-5 . com
This is only ONE of the top 50+ exciting ICE technologies in current development. You may also want to google Scuderi to see another that's been in development for many years. It has some interesting tech, but will never be practical in my opinion.
archileach 2 years ago
Wow it sounds like a chopper! I would patented if I were you
leanmeanmarine7 2 years ago
Boop Boop Boop lol fummy sound
nUaSvAy 2 years ago
you need two that counter rotate so the vibrations aren't so bad
ImRichRu 2 years ago
does it run on air?
robotpredator8 2 years ago
it would appear to suffer from the same problem as all other rotary type internal combustion engines and that would be the seal. when viewed in two dimensions the seal doesn't appear to be all that great and when viewed in three dimensions the seal is much worse, the more you try to fix the seal the more friction becomes a factor which is exactly why rotary engines never got put into common use but for those of you who like them Norton is making a rotary engine motorcycle that might intrigue you
burkeyturkey2000 2 years ago
the engine is gonna vibrate my ass through the entire seat off my car
davidzzz94 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Powerless/Pointless
runescapeownsnubs 2 years ago
@runescapeownsnubs
Powerless?
Lol your life and runescape are pointless
redrosecross 2 years ago
Yes.. powerless. And you don't make any sence. Try insulting me when you pass second grade.
runescapeownsnubs 2 years ago 6
@runescapeownsnubs so your saying Rx-7 is powerless? Hey buddy i am done with college already and ive had 3 cars and a gsxr, so don't tell me what I do and don't know.. your probally atleast 10 years old who plays runescape still.
and yes I played runescape before (In second grade)
redrosecross 2 years ago
I have an RX-7 with a 13b and it has so much power, i never said an rx7 is powerless, i'm saying this model is powerless it does like 1rpm and is pretty much useless for anything. it might be able to blow some bubbles, and i'm not meaning to offend anyone
runescapeownsnubs 2 years ago
its a bloody model idiot, the real thing would be bigger faster and better.
photography1990 2 years ago
how many times have you rebuilt your gixxer?
robby844 2 years ago
@robby844
Never... loser...
redrosecross 2 years ago
LMAO then you dont ride her.i feel bad for you.you claim youve done all this BS and have all this money.LMAO
robby844 2 years ago
@runescapeownsnubs maybe you should go back to second grade... and learn how to spell sense...
IHateOnPeopleHella 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wow wow wow at 2:29
TheLaurencekid 2 years ago
It was called a wenkel rotary engine I think...it's been 15 yrs since high school lmao
Rahja76 2 years ago
this works on the same design but the true wankel has a three point rotor as opposed to this engines circular rotor
05mustangguy 2 years ago
Actually, the Wenkel is massively more complicated, as it also incorporated some aspects of a reciprocating mechanism, as opposed to this design which is purely a rotating piston.
FluxAscender 2 years ago
look up the bourke engine.
robby844 2 years ago
When I was in high school my power tech teacher had a model of a rotary engine. That was the coolest thing I ever seen! Even how they worked. Didn't Mazda put rotary engines in their cars?
Rahja76 2 years ago
yes. the most famous being the mazda RX-7 and the RX-8
05mustangguy 2 years ago
correction please ;central street 1389...sorry ,,so sorry...
amirtoma 2 years ago
(4)..contact me legally and lawfully (by post,,,letters,,writing,not any other medium) on :
Canada-Ontario-Windsor of Essex-1389
N8Y 3V3
Amir Toma
amirtoma 2 years ago
---3--..4 ideas of these great inventions:
(1)the rotary engine-complet and ready for production.
(2)Cleaning machine for cleaning the engines from inside.
(3)the magical glass of shading (for cars and buildings).
(4)the replacement for the cam-shaft system in the engines So,any body who wishes to by one or more of these inventions,for the aim of producing it or them for the welfwre oof all huminity,not only for profit, individually or companies,from any spot of this planet,,let him...
amirtoma 2 years ago
---2--...that there would be prizes and gifts and and and...etc..the story is so long..but to make a long story short:Today I thank my God that I am still alive after a period of time which I was facing death every moment,,,not day,,for years,,
What I want to say here is :this invention is originally mine and it was stolen by Hussain Kamel(son -in -law of Saddam) but the fool stupid men of Saddam sold them(they were 4 ideas) incomplet.Here I am calling anybody who wants to legally buy the ...
amirtoma 2 years ago
---1---
Every body hear me,,,
I am Amir Toma,a very simple mechanic,at the present time I live in Canada-Ontario-windsor. I worked on the idea of the rotary engine since 1978,and (that was a great mistake then in Iraq)I presented the -incomplete- papers of of the design to the Information Office of the Republican Palace of Saddam Hussain in 1984 according to an advertisement on the T.V.of Baghdad encouraging inventors and designers to present their ideas and innovations,with promises .....
amirtoma 2 years ago
Add a vapor carburetor and you have it....
robinhooodvsyou 2 years ago
stillbirth
MrPrivyet 2 years ago
Sounds like George Jetson's space car! *laughter*
red33410 2 years ago 2
Good luck maintaining those seals! Orrr! Orrr! Orrr! (seal sounds).
red33410 2 years ago
If you can keep the combustion chamber sealed (as well as fixing the bearing problem) this could be big.
But you still have to fix the fact that it sounds a bubble machine running underwater.
chaz706 2 years ago
can it be moved by air?
how strong is it?
can i use it as a car engine?
robotpredator8 2 years ago
I don't understand why you call it a vane,
when as a compressor it is known as a stationary blade compressor. A vane compressor is yet another type, and very distinguishable.
Electrorod1 2 years ago
Fantastic. You really have your stuff together.
rayunseitig 2 years ago
Very,very nice.Please check out my rotary engine concept. Thanks.
dedwards8708 2 years ago
Replace the vane with a bearing so that it rolls instead of slides.
Your vane wear problem is gone. :D
biggeorge77 2 years ago 3
Exactly, I came to the same conclusion
about ten years ago. My roller-blade
replacement is a ball point pen, using
a roller instead of a ball.
Electrorod1 2 years ago
WONDERFUL WORK !!!
FiasaPower 2 years ago
Looks like it would last much longer than a Wankel. Not as many sharp edges to wear off.
I'd love to see this in application. A Go-kart maybe.
DocWolph 2 years ago
The rotary for mr bubbles!!
ChaseSpeer 2 years ago
Sounds like a Bubble minigun! xD aaaAAAAHhhhhahahahahahahhaa
Latexlennart 2 years ago
If you take a conventional engine and put to run by it's axle (only to demonstrate it's work) , it will sound like it .
FiasaPower 2 years ago
Sounds cool! ^^ (And fun)
Latexlennart 2 years ago
it sounds funy AEHAUEHAUEHAEHAUEhAEUhEUhUAhAUhAEUhAEhEuhEuAEuhAEUhAUEhaEuhu
gtdrifting 2 years ago
Lol, the timing belt is $40, spending 14 hours to tear appart half the car and put it back together is another $800, that is why people don't replace them. I doubt this will be more efficient than the modern rotary design for whole slew of reasons since it is almost the same design except it has recipricating parts, doesn't use combustion pressure to maintain a seal and has very long sealing paths. I doubt it will maintain power at an efficient rpm for very long. Stated for constructive purposes
Kyrasis6 2 years ago
Simply delightful. Congratulations! :)
levogiro 2 years ago
Is this possible to do with some rotary fridge compressors attached together ?
(or something).
robinhooodvsyou 2 years ago
bravo man this thing is amazing wish i had enough patience to build stuff keep up the good work
legato8278 2 years ago
hehehe it makes funny noise hahaha hehehehe hlsdofsldfl
Glendale1901 2 years ago
Most new ideas go absolutely nowhere, and this one may very well join those ranks. But if we were to let that deter us, then innovation would surely die. Also, this design draws allot from prior art, and it's possible that some future work can in turn benefit from some of these ideas.
RotaryICEman 2 years ago
Nice ,we need to get away from rod and piston Now!
will4ward 2 years ago
Thank you.
Any idea of specific power, specific fuel consumption? How about throttle response? The sound is certainly less aggravating than piston engines :)
JPRubber2 2 years ago
Both 2-strokes, and Wankels have higher specific power. This design is all about efficiency, and I expect specific fuel consumption to be second to none once the seals are perfected. Throttle response is excellend due to the unique vane modulation scheme which effectively eliminates throttling. Sound is one measure of engine efficiency. An engine that's expelling hot, loud, high-pressure gasses, is throwing away energy out the exhaust pipe. These models operate without mufflers.
RotaryICEman 2 years ago
Are you talking polluting efficiency or non polluting/ hehe, piston engines can get up to 3 times the efficiency they do now, if emmissions weren't an issue. The other issue of having a lower specific power is larger engine volume/unit power, not displacement, just package size. Non throttling is good. Seals: a minor sounding issue can become quite the headache. TOTALLY agree on the sound = wasted energy. Thanks for the reply, kudos on the nopatent. Parallels linux :)
JPRubber2 2 years ago
Avesome! Thanx for all creative people for supporting evolution of technology. Shame on those people and companys who make it difficoult for them to release their invention to public. Dont give up, youre not alone.
SmokeTatum 2 years ago
Thanks.
RotaryICEman 2 years ago
i compend the enventor of this, and his healthy outlook to being flexible...
ghostcivic99 2 years ago
will this engine run on hydrogen fuel? Make sure you have the bubbler and backfire arrestor ready.
AdMiRaLeDpIeTt 2 years ago