@tubefan1234 so what?are you just saying that in hopes of gettin thumbs up?are you just being a dumbass tryin to start a argument OR just to feel good?BF3 has more better destruction then MW3
Yea its cool but not as cool as they made it out to be, bfbc2 is way better in terms of leveling a map! 4 frostbite 2 we should be able to really destroy a map but of course we can't ..shit can't even bring down have the structures and bushes and some trees. In my opinion it could be a lot better...shit the whole game could be!
one of the reasons why I dislike fps is the walking animation in 1st person view, I mean LOOK AT THAT! Even in a game known for its graphics has terrible walking animation, that "soldier" walks like someone who desperately needs the bathroom or my grandmother sleepwalking, it's just terrible
Why are there always these lame "X is better than Y" comparisons? BC2 destruction and BF3 destruction are both cool. Granted, you could completely demolish buildings in BC2 and kill the people inside them but then again, it's not BF3. They are different games. Both are good at what they do.
@randomguy9898 I'm sure Battlefield 4 will have total destruction like BC2 did. kinda like with BC you could only destroy the walls and then in BC2 you where able to drop them down. BF3 has a lot more Buildings too, BF4 will have a bunch of building with more destruction.
@j0th yes but DICE constantly bragged about the destruction that the Frostbite 2 engine brings to BF3 yet most of the destruction seems like it's added as an aesthetic thing. NOT being able to destroy certain buildings attracts campers to such buildings.
@M0t0rBreath89 yes, I feel like one of the reasons BF3 doesn't have total destruction if because they are barely learning about the Frostbite 2 engine, so I'm pretty sure in Battlefield 4 almost all if not all the building will be able to collapse. =]
Definitely.. In bc2 you could almost blew every wall you see but in BF3 it's not the case. Destructible walls seem very limited in BF3 and it feels like destruction in bf3 is just for eye candy.
Now if i could drive through the streets of bf3 without running over a mine..
LtDjOwns 1 week ago
@tubefan1234 so what?are you just saying that in hopes of gettin thumbs up?are you just being a dumbass tryin to start a argument OR just to feel good?BF3 has more better destruction then MW3
Furiful1 1 week ago
Console version of BF3, Y U NEARLY NO HAVE DESTRUCTIBLE ENVIRONMENT?
Stupious 1 month ago
I wish Vanilla BF3 had this much destruction.
J0V11 1 month ago
In a before and after shot of call of duty, the only difference you will see is.......... will need more time to think about this one....
desidog11 1 month ago 5
Thumps up if u were her because of theibornstellar
XxRaOuDixX 1 month ago
N4G.com
The site of loser fanboys...
SignifiedSix11 1 month ago
Directed here by News For Gamers - n4g.com!
jlt08fab 1 month ago
Thumbs up if you came here because of N4G!
sambrar97 1 month ago 6
Hoi gois, just wonderin where all the views are coming from!
TheBillandGaryShow 1 month ago
@TheBillandGaryShow
Your video is up on N4G.
ccchhriss 1 month ago
@ccchhriss Thank you.
TheBillandGaryShow 1 month ago
@TheBillandGaryShow n4g
josedewish2011 1 month ago
@TheBillandGaryShow N4G.com
JoshBurningham 1 month ago
@TheBillandGaryShow and on gamepur, rejoice forever alone guy!
SLIPKNOT0fan1 1 month ago
every building in bad company 2 was the same lol, but however you have more of these buildings falling down and ground destruction i suppose.
zerox505 1 month ago
Sooo where is the difference ? :P
I love battlefield :)
3akars 1 month ago
Fact: BC2 was so bad it couldn't outsell MW2.
tubefan1234 1 month ago
@tubefan1234 Nay. Fact: BC2 sold less than MW2, despite being the better of the two.
dudenessesity 1 month ago
Yea its cool but not as cool as they made it out to be, bfbc2 is way better in terms of leveling a map! 4 frostbite 2 we should be able to really destroy a map but of course we can't ..shit can't even bring down have the structures and bushes and some trees. In my opinion it could be a lot better...shit the whole game could be!
hightcd 1 month ago
This is why I love the frostbite engine
Insanityflea1 1 month ago
one of the reasons why I dislike fps is the walking animation in 1st person view, I mean LOOK AT THAT! Even in a game known for its graphics has terrible walking animation, that "soldier" walks like someone who desperately needs the bathroom or my grandmother sleepwalking, it's just terrible
kent80082006 1 month ago
Why are there always these lame "X is better than Y" comparisons? BC2 destruction and BF3 destruction are both cool. Granted, you could completely demolish buildings in BC2 and kill the people inside them but then again, it's not BF3. They are different games. Both are good at what they do.
rlindabury 1 month ago
@rlindabury Yes, both are good at providing practically the same gameplay, but minus the fully destructible buildings.
IPostStuffWhenever 1 month ago
In Call Of Duty you can shoot through plywood... -_-
CoreyClarkYC93 1 month ago
Niggas had to live in there
Bucketloop 1 month ago
BC2 is so much better than BF3, and runs much better on most systems.
I still play BC2 today, and got tired of BF3 pretty quickly. not to mention Origin..
zeonos 1 month ago
BF3: no exterior walls
BC2: what walls?
randomguy9898 1 month ago
@randomguy9898 I'm sure Battlefield 4 will have total destruction like BC2 did. kinda like with BC you could only destroy the walls and then in BC2 you where able to drop them down. BF3 has a lot more Buildings too, BF4 will have a bunch of building with more destruction.
jr4chargers 1 month ago
BFBC2 Destruction: Tactical, Game changer
BC3 Destruction: Less tactical, looks better
RedBlueOmega 1 month ago
@RedBlueOmega Not to be lame, but isn't taking cover tactical?
j0th 1 month ago
@j0th yes but DICE constantly bragged about the destruction that the Frostbite 2 engine brings to BF3 yet most of the destruction seems like it's added as an aesthetic thing. NOT being able to destroy certain buildings attracts campers to such buildings.
RedBlueOmega 1 month ago
Why do I imagine that he's waddling?
deathcommand 1 month ago
It's funny how you compare BF3's destruction w/ that of BC2. BC2 hardly had any buildings.
M0t0rBreath89 1 month ago 35
@M0t0rBreath89 yes, I feel like one of the reasons BF3 doesn't have total destruction if because they are barely learning about the Frostbite 2 engine, so I'm pretty sure in Battlefield 4 almost all if not all the building will be able to collapse. =]
jr4chargers 1 month ago
@M0t0rBreath89 Cause I blew it all up. :)
xOneLimiTx 1 month ago
dam
remixmaster5000 1 month ago
As much as I love the Battlefield 3 destruction, the destruction in Bad Company 2 was so much better. Soooo much better.
Alphanoon 1 month ago 14
@Alphanoon agreed Bad Company 2 was awesome
TheMagma500 1 month ago
@Alphanoon but it had alot less buildings like @M0t0rBreath89 said.
jr4chargers 1 month ago
@Alphanoon
Definitely.. In bc2 you could almost blew every wall you see but in BF3 it's not the case. Destructible walls seem very limited in BF3 and it feels like destruction in bf3 is just for eye candy.
9800GtGameplay 1 month ago
@Alphanoon I can count the buildings in bc2 maps with my fingers ...
3akars 1 month ago
@Alphanoon no, in BC2, the only thing was that they could come down, but in BF3 there IS more destruction
RaNd0mPr0dUcTi0nZs 1 month ago
i love BF3 everything is so dynamic and you can destroy most buildings and stuff
killzall13 1 month ago
Nice video! Really shows the details!
TheLinkinparkdude 1 month ago
Nice.
MichaelBailee 1 month ago