But is it worth it, just by looking at the positions of the curves? @5:03 you could have an extra 1million trees/pa planted, but you have to give (2.7+1.0)million tax credits - and the 'deadweight' loss only looks like (1.0 million * $10)/2. That looks like $37m forgone for an imputed added benefit (from higher consumption) of $5million.
But is it worth it, just by looking at the positions of the curves? @5:03 you could have an extra 1million trees/pa planted, but you have to give (2.7+1.0)million tax credits - and the 'deadweight' loss only looks like (1.0 million * $10)/2. That looks like $37m forgone for an imputed added benefit (from higher consumption) of $5million.
paul1964uk 1 month ago
Instead of adding the $10/tree to the demand curve, could you also deduct it from the marginal cost curve?
c1earwater 1 month ago
Accidentes chistoso
mai2xs 1 month ago
first, sorry I had to say it!
TheVisualCoder 1 month ago
@TheVisualCoder comon this is for education, post something useful NOOB!
Dragonicafan 1 month ago
@Dragonicafan
sorry your right, im a huge fan of free education myself soooo yeah lets all listen and learn :3
TheVisualCoder 1 month ago