PUMP / COMPRESSOR Super-Efficient Mechanism

[sacr3]

Terrible because of the Gear system, RPMs around 7000 on this thing would be equivilant to 3000-4000 on a normal combustion engine. So no, you'd get less power and the more moving parts and gears means more to replace when damaged.

[1crazyfocker]

you math well is not even math, 2nd your system is geared so it takes less torque to to pump but higher rpms, a simple way to prover your false bold claims is a side by side compareson, with a geared crank (make it a true comparison) and this old idea, but in reality the best water pump crank evermade was the speed changing geared pump, as you turned the handle, the gear ratio changed, so that 15% or turn reset the piston then the remaning 85% of the rotation went into raising the water/piston

[sCUNThorPENIS]

Once this is up-geared you'll find your invention is a high-friction pile of horse-wankery.

In fact it sucks such big donkey balls that your mum wants it to drive a giant dildo up her chuff.

To pleasure her it would need to be powered by a fusion engine the size of Jupiter and would consume 10 Suns per second of anal thrusting.

[siggiepop]

FOR FUCKS SAKE, MOTORIZE IT!! Stop this hang cranking bullshit !!!!

[AmoebicChipJester]

Tabag XD

[chevguy502]

i agree with you 100% that this will never replace the internal combustion type engine but it could be lubricated with an oil pump and gears would not wear out and there are no splines in there they are gear teeth. i believe what will kill it is the imbalance of the invention when there is high impact or vibration it squeezes out the lubrication between teeth and causes brinelling in the gear face

[chevguy502]

agreed and not to mention it will be out of balance a regular combustion engine with bearings and a crankshaft will never be replaced by this there is too much vibration

[USEPartyPeople]

@klandertje i know what u mean. Dont even watch his other videos because they are all just terrible.

The key to energy efficiency is the least amount of resistance possible. not stupid confusing random gears like this guy has.

[isreal194]

i dont understand how an engine set up like this is more efficient then a normal 4 stroke engine?

Is there less friction within the components compared to a normal 4 stroke engine?

Can it run at high RPM?

Dose it perform better?

[boo66]

klandertje.. the principle seems to be that it converts much more of the rotary motion to reciprocal motion than a conventianal crank, which produces roughly SHM.

The friction is a separate issue, which would depend on the application of the principle.

So... aaargh too!!

:o)

[klandertje]

:S it seems, I don't see how it converts more of the rotary motion into reciprocal motion. I even see less reciprocal motion than a normal a conventional crank. Each turn on a conventional cranck is one pump motion. it seems to be somewhere between 2 and 3 revolutions for a single pump action. there's no advantage there.

Secondly you can see the hand operating not one but both axles to get the cranck past the upper point

[hellohal3]

5 stars

[wodnik0123]

good idea !