Beacus he possessed Leoric and took his body. The solestone is Diablo. First before this game an arcangel slaind Diablo and burried his solestone deep under the ground and build a Monastary above it. And after many hundred years it was forgotten that DIablos solestone was under the Monastary so King Leoric ( King Leoric is the guy in the 3 cinematic) wanted to live there and he had a son don't know his name let's call him Son of leoric. Son of leoric got possessed by Diablo.
Diablo possessed Son of Leoric in his dreams. Diablo filled his dreams with big monsters and many other things.
Diablo also showed Son of Leoric the way to the soulstone in his dreams. And after a while Son of Leoric walked down to where the soulstone was the freed the soulstone and put it in his forehead. And there Diablo was free once again of no that was the first time he was freed. And the was down to Diablo is called ''The Catacombs'' and he filled them with all the monsters from
Son of Leoric's dreams and walked down to hell. And when you slain him he removes the soulstone and the person that was possessed will come back to his normal form and that was Leoric's son that was possessed. But there is still one more thing Diablo let the hero slain him beacuse he knew that the hero would do what he did remove the soulstone and put in his own forehead. The hero thought that he was strong enough to hold back Diablo but Diablo was stronger than the hero so he took
control over the hero and now Diablo is stronger beacuse he has a stronger body. IF Diablo would try to pessess the hero it would not work beacuse his too strong but Son of leaoric was weak so he possessed him instead and that why he turn into a human at the ending beacuse that's Leoric's son. And I think that I did not explain that thing with the hero. Diablo saw that the hero was strong but not stronger then himself he could kill him if he wanted but he did'nt cuz he knew that he
To be honest, I kind of prefer game cinematics from the late nineties to early 200s, because the stiff animation and soft textures had its own kind of charm, and they generally utilized atmosphere much better. Nowadays, everything is too slick and overproduced, and it comes across as if they're trying to tell the whole story in movie form rather than just set the general ambience/mood/style of the game.
It is true that the main sense of danger and, indeed, horror came from the cinema of past Diablo games. The chills you got from the first, the sense of impending doom, mystery and darkness you got from the second. People's bodies serrated as you traveled the citadel; the dark forests, the book of the countess. Though D2 also had Act 2 -- very bright and colorful. D3 will likely have both as well -- and we've only really seen class trailers, not in game cinemas as of yet.
This is also seen in act V, where we see the beautiful mountain peak full of pure snow. Many are wounded, but the city still stands. It is only until you exit outside the world that you see that it is just that -- a world that was once beautiful, but ravaged by a prime evil. It is likely that having a very colorful or beautiful scene, only to transition into what it becomes when a prime evil touches it, could bring the world to life, showing terrible consequences.
@DoomGamer3000 u missunterstood something in the diablo story; bloodraven was one of the rogues in the camp and was corrupted by the evils (diablo II).. and the false summoner is explained in the diablo books.. the wanderer is the hero from diablo I who fights with himself against diablo. cuz diablo is trying to get control of him just because "our hero" ramed the soulstone of diablo into his head. at the end diablo wins and our hero gets diablo himself.. the dark wanderer
Nostalgia indeed my friend. Good old times. I remember having 7 years old and playing this shit on old play station. It's dark and eerie atmosphere still remains unmatched.
@jughead18sp not just diablo 1 movie.. have u read the diablo books ? man its crazy story I swear.. they should make several film episodes to the whole story. like star wars.. diablo episode 1 Lol
@mwhighlander I'm with ya there. The original development team for Diablo had vision and they knew their baby well, but like all things it had to end. Personally, I'm in much anticipation at the next Guild Wars set to release next year; the reason I bring it up is that some original devs from Diablo now work for ArenaNet (the dev team behind Guild Wars). Genuinely looking to bring innovation to a watered-down copycat genre (the MMO).
I will say that despite the crappily rendered graphics of D3 (IMO), the actual live action looks quite remarkable--particularly the special effects from spells and gruesome death animations. And I still think the game ought to be fun in keeping with certain key elements that helped Diablo stand the test of time: randomized loot, randomized dungeon crawling, simple yet fun & rewarding game play, intricate character customization to diversify each class, and of course the intriguing depth of lore.
@RunaroundStar Good. Go play D1 over and over again then. And leave D3 for those of us who like actual art design in our games beyond using the colors black, red and grey over and over again.
@RunaroundStar I've honestly disappeared from anything Diablo 3 over the past year. I've made my decision about the game. The new creators of Diablo simply don't have what I want in mind.
@mwhighlander Then go play D1 over and over again and leave D3 for people who actually appreciate real art design in their games instead of 'lulz blizz u must make everyting black and red, dark liek my SOOUULL!11!!'
@Burzghash00 I think there's something wrong with you that you feel so hurt because Blizzard has decided to take Diablo far away from its original direction.
@mwhighlander I don't feel hurt at all. I'm incredibly content with the direction they've taken it in.
I think there's something wrong with you that you feel so hurt because Blizzard has decided to take Diablo "far away from its original direction."
(Hint: You haven't seen the full game and have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe you can come back and comment when it's actually from an informed stance.)
@Burzghash00 I am quite content too with --->My Opinion<--- on the game. I have no interest in what I've seen when I was heavily following the game development. If you find the game appealing then all the better for you. There are other more interesting games on my "waiting" list I'd rather play. You don't have to sound so hostile.
The goal here was for the hero to defeat diablo and contain him because if he doesn't he will come back and to do it he had to put diablo's soul stone into him.. the second game clearly shows how to defeat the diablo (to break the stone in hell forge..) the reason why they didn't say this in the first is because they didn't think ahead or they wanted to make more money on this series.. (the reason for the worldstone could be the same..) since the world stone is destroyed new story is capable..
@LamentedxSoul well wow and diablo do not go together.. the concept of paying monthly could not work with diablo.(if they start making it a online game with new events every month it may have possibility but diablo is not that kind of a game.)
so the best way is to make another game to gain more players.(diablo 2 was a huge and they could have just end it at LOD but they gave us an ending with many ideas for new diablo game. if they didn't want to gain more money out of it why continue?
@lljohnballzll Hell, why not? Diablo was a great game from the start and was hoping that they'd make a second one right after I beat it lol. Although I don't get how d3 is going to work... With the prime-evils dead, who is going to take their places?
@LamentedxSoul well they are not really dead... remember what tyreal said? the world is going to change for the better or for the worse. so probably they can just say that the new world has new diablo who is more powerful than before.
@lljohnballzll or the forces of heaven.. remember the diablo books about the nephalem.. it was said that the heaven and the hell are fighting against each other since beginning of time. sanctuary was made by archangel inarius brother of tyrael. he and the daughter of mephisto so the normal humans called nephalem.. they were able to be stronger than heaven and hell.. thats why hell AND heaven trys to take the human on their side.. to finish the war.
@lljohnballzll and Im sure in diablo III we get more of the story between hell and heaven. diablo II and I was just a fight between the human and hell.. and maybe III will be the final war between hell and heaven.. would be great if we can see the angiris council.. Im excited about diablo III not just the game and graphics.. about the storyline. we see many old friends in the trailer.. cain and diablo. and maybe a comeback of mephisto cuz he is famous in the war.. more than baal!
@LamentedxSoul Actually, the Prime Evils haven't died in the sense that we mortals (we humans) die, they've simply been sent to the abyss without a soul stone to keep them anchored; essentially banishing them from Sanctuary. However, with the destruction of the World Stone there's no boundary between worlds and nothing to keep the forces of Hel at bay.
Also, it's been verified by a Blizzard rep that the final demon in the cinematic that had originally unveiled D3 was indeed Diablo himself.
@lljohnballzll Believe it or not, many people devote their lives to careers and creating things, which they put a personal willingness and care to without some superficial incentive behind it like money. I realize that can be difficult to believe with capitalism's very meaning being money and people being brain washed into thinking that their every reason for being and life source revolves around the economy, but it's true.
@CiniCraft you ARE the man ,i never played 'diablo' or 'orcs and humans' because ,i never had D.O.S. installed as my operating system so this is the first time i can see those cinematics
i feel both one and three are stupid due to him being such a strong warrior why would he fall to insanity and also why would he be so stupid as to think he alone could contain Diablo the lord of terror so i think ending storie two is the best but choose for your self
I love Diablo i really do but the ending i have always thought was just a tad retarded...Now there are two stories about the ending one is the warrior though he could contain Diablos power and two is the horror and evil took over his mind and took control of his body without him knowing it untill it was to late and ending up with Diablo having a new host...now that i think about it there are three stories and the third not unlike the secend he whent insane and smashed a rock into his head...
Because the warrior wanted to fight the demon within his body. He thought that as long as he took control of Diablo, he won't roam anywhere else spreading his terror. However, it was Diablo's plan all along to enter the warrior and possess him because he wanted to take control of a body that was stronger than the one he was formerly in.
@Hyruku12 cuz just killing diablo kills him not really lol.. as u might seen after our hero took the soulstone away diablos body falled apart.. and all we saw was another human body with a whole in his head.. so its clear that diablo once entrapped many people to be at sanctuary. with destroying the soulstone in hells forge u might have killed diablo or made it impossible for him to enter sanctuary.. thats for what everybodys waiting.. how could diablo returned? (diablo III)
when i was little i was always confused this with Warcraft 1, 'cause they look so familliar in cinematics. I assume that those 2 games are made by a exactly same team. Diablo 2 just never get a same hype like first, but it's still a good game.
No, the games wheren't made by the same team, as Blizz North was a dev Blizzard had Vivendi buy, the cinematics team was probably the same for all Blizzard games though.
this cinematic is dark and spooky. fuck diablo 3 is like a fantasy rpg with all the flashy shit and all the glitters and all the bling. its more cartoony
sir diablo 3 looks awesome so far and it still DOES look gloomy and dark.
atleast diablo 3 isn't looking out to look like flyff/ro or something. Think about it. Could you imagine a cutsey chibi diablo/baal/meph?
the screenshots/movies that are already released look great and the world still does look like it's typical dark/gloomy self. so why you think it looks cartoony/glittery i don't know.
they should do a remake of 1&2 using the unreal3 engine and have havok physics. (hell, let's get some guys and make a homebrew version!!! who's with me?)
this is my guess for diablo 3 since it didnt say bals soullstone was destroyed baal is going to return and resseruct his brothers and cause a massive army of hell to take over the entire Diablo world unless Tyreal didnt die in the catatrophic explosion he has a few tricks up his sleeve to kick ass
Hmmm, lets see here, I save the world from the devil incarnate, he has a shiny gem sticking out of his head, the other guy that was just possessed by him lies dying on the floor, I... Take said crystal and shove it in my... head? At what point did this seem a good idea? It wasn't necessary for him to do it...
And if I think about this deeply, this is one of the few good reason why tyreal should've been there to guide the hero. Or if the hero only knew about how to perfectly destroying the stone, there's no point in shoving that hard stone in his head. Ouch!
When you think about it, it really takes...err...balls to shove a crystal into your head. Even worse, a crystal of that size and shape and with the devil in it! :D
this game made me sleep with the lights on:S
PieterDave 1 month ago
i never played this game, but i can imagine these would've given me horrible nightmares if i played them back then, as a kid
z3roo0 4 months ago
why does diablo crumble and turn into a human at the ending?
T1000HD 4 months ago
@T1000HD
Beacus he possessed Leoric and took his body. The solestone is Diablo. First before this game an arcangel slaind Diablo and burried his solestone deep under the ground and build a Monastary above it. And after many hundred years it was forgotten that DIablos solestone was under the Monastary so King Leoric ( King Leoric is the guy in the 3 cinematic) wanted to live there and he had a son don't know his name let's call him Son of leoric. Son of leoric got possessed by Diablo.
MrTarik834 4 months ago
@T1000HD
Diablo possessed Son of Leoric in his dreams. Diablo filled his dreams with big monsters and many other things.
Diablo also showed Son of Leoric the way to the soulstone in his dreams. And after a while Son of Leoric walked down to where the soulstone was the freed the soulstone and put it in his forehead. And there Diablo was free once again of no that was the first time he was freed. And the was down to Diablo is called ''The Catacombs'' and he filled them with all the monsters from
MrTarik834 4 months ago
@T1000HD
Son of Leoric's dreams and walked down to hell. And when you slain him he removes the soulstone and the person that was possessed will come back to his normal form and that was Leoric's son that was possessed. But there is still one more thing Diablo let the hero slain him beacuse he knew that the hero would do what he did remove the soulstone and put in his own forehead. The hero thought that he was strong enough to hold back Diablo but Diablo was stronger than the hero so he took
MrTarik834 4 months ago
@T1000HD
control over the hero and now Diablo is stronger beacuse he has a stronger body. IF Diablo would try to pessess the hero it would not work beacuse his too strong but Son of leaoric was weak so he possessed him instead and that why he turn into a human at the ending beacuse that's Leoric's son. And I think that I did not explain that thing with the hero. Diablo saw that the hero was strong but not stronger then himself he could kill him if he wanted but he did'nt cuz he knew that he
MrTarik834 4 months ago
To be honest, I kind of prefer game cinematics from the late nineties to early 200s, because the stiff animation and soft textures had its own kind of charm, and they generally utilized atmosphere much better. Nowadays, everything is too slick and overproduced, and it comes across as if they're trying to tell the whole story in movie form rather than just set the general ambience/mood/style of the game.
RebellionLord 4 months ago
they should remake this...at least with better graphics
iceflar 5 months ago
@iceflar Just imagine. They should do that with a lot of games.
ThatWhiteGuy74 4 months ago
@ThatWhiteGuy74 true and those game are problie worth it
iceflar 4 months ago
things we wont see in our life time
1)diablo 1,2 remakes
2)diablo 3
onimas1 5 months ago
@onimas1 um there is supposed to be diablo 3 coming out sometime...there is gameplay footage n stuff
Marioiswicked 5 months ago
@onimas1 We will see Diablo 3... check the site, bro.
ThatWhiteGuy74 4 months ago
Dated graphics, but the intro still holds up.
dragonstormx 6 months ago
Okay, the butcher and Lazerous scenes I've never seen in the game. How can I view this IN GAME?
Or were they removed?
Velheim1334 6 months ago
@Velheim1334 Playing single player.
NY1love 5 months ago
never seen that short clip with the butcher there
erbgorre 6 months ago
Blizzard's crew should watch theses trailers over and over before making a crappy game like D3, Not even matt uleman gonna work for them now!
ShiningforceHero 6 months ago
Please do not judge a game that is not even out yet. It's not what intelligent people do, it's what trolls and the ignorant attempt.
RPGOmen 6 months ago
@RPGOmen im not ranting about the gameplay,
all i am saying is that Theses cinematics give you a feel of epicness and Gothicness that D3 surely lacks.
when you watch anyone of the videos made by blizzard its not gothic at all and way to bright
ShiningforceHero 6 months ago
@ShiningforceHero
It is true that the main sense of danger and, indeed, horror came from the cinema of past Diablo games. The chills you got from the first, the sense of impending doom, mystery and darkness you got from the second. People's bodies serrated as you traveled the citadel; the dark forests, the book of the countess. Though D2 also had Act 2 -- very bright and colorful. D3 will likely have both as well -- and we've only really seen class trailers, not in game cinemas as of yet.
RPGOmen 6 months ago
@ShiningforceHero
(part 2)
This is also seen in act V, where we see the beautiful mountain peak full of pure snow. Many are wounded, but the city still stands. It is only until you exit outside the world that you see that it is just that -- a world that was once beautiful, but ravaged by a prime evil. It is likely that having a very colorful or beautiful scene, only to transition into what it becomes when a prime evil touches it, could bring the world to life, showing terrible consequences.
RPGOmen 6 months ago
Warrior - Wanderer; Rouge - Bloodraven; Wizard - The false Summoner
DoomGamer3000 7 months ago
@DoomGamer3000 That... sounds about right actually. Damn, never thought about that
deaderdeadbpu 7 months ago
@DoomGamer3000 u missunterstood something in the diablo story; bloodraven was one of the rogues in the camp and was corrupted by the evils (diablo II).. and the false summoner is explained in the diablo books.. the wanderer is the hero from diablo I who fights with himself against diablo. cuz diablo is trying to get control of him just because "our hero" ramed the soulstone of diablo into his head. at the end diablo wins and our hero gets diablo himself.. the dark wanderer
ujayu 4 months ago
1 Guy didnt defeat diablo on normal....
Fatalty123 7 months ago
great graphics
macattack172 7 months ago
Where is the wanderer?????
244jovan 7 months ago
@244jovan The fellow jamming the stone in his head at the end is the wanderer.
Crusader2010 7 months ago
Nostalgia indeed my friend. Good old times. I remember having 7 years old and playing this shit on old play station. It's dark and eerie atmosphere still remains unmatched.
POFkennoth 7 months ago
I truly hope they add those eery sound tracks from D1 in D3
rtr01 7 months ago
they should make diablo 1 a movie.
and when they do, dont do it like they did tekken
jughead18sp 7 months ago
@jughead18sp not just diablo 1 movie.. have u read the diablo books ? man its crazy story I swear.. they should make several film episodes to the whole story. like star wars.. diablo episode 1 Lol
ujayu 4 months ago
i ve never seen the 2nd one, awesome
chelo88888 8 months ago
Soulstone - headshoot!!!
244jovan 8 months ago
Soulstone: Apply directly to forehead.
CragHack19 9 months ago 27
@CragHack19 lmaoooo
first time i was like...wtf why would u try to contain the f*** strongest demon known -,-
den i realize it had to be so he wouldnt escape lol....guess dat stone wasnt so useful eh>?
TheMexican02 8 months ago
The music of Diablo 1 is EPIC
DieSuperMelone 1 year ago 3
There is a reason why people fell in love with Diablo 1 and hate D3 art style.
We love dark gritty, not the colorful and fun to look at.
mwhighlander 1 year ago 17
@mwhighlander I'm with ya there. The original development team for Diablo had vision and they knew their baby well, but like all things it had to end. Personally, I'm in much anticipation at the next Guild Wars set to release next year; the reason I bring it up is that some original devs from Diablo now work for ArenaNet (the dev team behind Guild Wars). Genuinely looking to bring innovation to a watered-down copycat genre (the MMO).
EternalSage07 1 year ago
I will say that despite the crappily rendered graphics of D3 (IMO), the actual live action looks quite remarkable--particularly the special effects from spells and gruesome death animations. And I still think the game ought to be fun in keeping with certain key elements that helped Diablo stand the test of time: randomized loot, randomized dungeon crawling, simple yet fun & rewarding game play, intricate character customization to diversify each class, and of course the intriguing depth of lore.
EternalSage07 1 year ago
@mwhighlander YES! Have you seen the new trailer for Diablo 3? It looks like Warcraft or a Pixar movie.
RunaroundStar 1 month ago
@RunaroundStar Good. Go play D1 over and over again then. And leave D3 for those of us who like actual art design in our games beyond using the colors black, red and grey over and over again.
Burzghash00 1 month ago
@Burzghash00 So you like unoriginal basic art design like every other fantasy rpg/dungeon crawler and with a colorful childish feel?
RunaroundStar 1 month ago
@RunaroundStar I've honestly disappeared from anything Diablo 3 over the past year. I've made my decision about the game. The new creators of Diablo simply don't have what I want in mind.
mwhighlander 1 month ago
@mwhighlander Then go play D1 over and over again and leave D3 for people who actually appreciate real art design in their games instead of 'lulz blizz u must make everyting black and red, dark liek my SOOUULL!11!!'
Burzghash00 1 month ago
@Burzghash00 I think there's something wrong with you that you feel so hurt because Blizzard has decided to take Diablo far away from its original direction.
mwhighlander 1 month ago
@mwhighlander I don't feel hurt at all. I'm incredibly content with the direction they've taken it in.
I think there's something wrong with you that you feel so hurt because Blizzard has decided to take Diablo "far away from its original direction."
(Hint: You haven't seen the full game and have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe you can come back and comment when it's actually from an informed stance.)
Burzghash00 1 month ago
@Burzghash00 I am quite content too with --->My Opinion<--- on the game. I have no interest in what I've seen when I was heavily following the game development. If you find the game appealing then all the better for you. There are other more interesting games on my "waiting" list I'd rather play. You don't have to sound so hostile.
mwhighlander 1 month ago
the first 1 in diablo 1 beats all of diablo 2
MrWalalaa 1 year ago
The goal here was for the hero to defeat diablo and contain him because if he doesn't he will come back and to do it he had to put diablo's soul stone into him.. the second game clearly shows how to defeat the diablo (to break the stone in hell forge..) the reason why they didn't say this in the first is because they didn't think ahead or they wanted to make more money on this series.. (the reason for the worldstone could be the same..) since the world stone is destroyed new story is capable..
lljohnballzll 1 year ago
@lljohnballzll Nah dude if they really wanted money from diablo they would have pulled a "wow" and make it a monthly fee lol.
LamentedxSoul 1 year ago
Comment removed
lljohnballzll 1 year ago
@LamentedxSoul well wow and diablo do not go together.. the concept of paying monthly could not work with diablo.(if they start making it a online game with new events every month it may have possibility but diablo is not that kind of a game.)
so the best way is to make another game to gain more players.(diablo 2 was a huge and they could have just end it at LOD but they gave us an ending with many ideas for new diablo game. if they didn't want to gain more money out of it why continue?
lljohnballzll 1 year ago
@lljohnballzll Hell, why not? Diablo was a great game from the start and was hoping that they'd make a second one right after I beat it lol. Although I don't get how d3 is going to work... With the prime-evils dead, who is going to take their places?
LamentedxSoul 1 year ago
@LamentedxSoul well they are not really dead... remember what tyreal said? the world is going to change for the better or for the worse. so probably they can just say that the new world has new diablo who is more powerful than before.
lljohnballzll 1 year ago
@lljohnballzll or the forces of heaven.. remember the diablo books about the nephalem.. it was said that the heaven and the hell are fighting against each other since beginning of time. sanctuary was made by archangel inarius brother of tyrael. he and the daughter of mephisto so the normal humans called nephalem.. they were able to be stronger than heaven and hell.. thats why hell AND heaven trys to take the human on their side.. to finish the war.
ujayu 4 months ago
@lljohnballzll and Im sure in diablo III we get more of the story between hell and heaven. diablo II and I was just a fight between the human and hell.. and maybe III will be the final war between hell and heaven.. would be great if we can see the angiris council.. Im excited about diablo III not just the game and graphics.. about the storyline. we see many old friends in the trailer.. cain and diablo. and maybe a comeback of mephisto cuz he is famous in the war.. more than baal!
ujayu 4 months ago
@LamentedxSoul Actually, the Prime Evils haven't died in the sense that we mortals (we humans) die, they've simply been sent to the abyss without a soul stone to keep them anchored; essentially banishing them from Sanctuary. However, with the destruction of the World Stone there's no boundary between worlds and nothing to keep the forces of Hel at bay.
Also, it's been verified by a Blizzard rep that the final demon in the cinematic that had originally unveiled D3 was indeed Diablo himself.
EternalSage07 1 year ago
@EternalSage07 It took a Blizzard rep to reveal that?
KillerDreaming 1 year ago
@LamentedxSoul Diablo is forever
Jayjon81 10 months ago
@lljohnballzll Believe it or not, many people devote their lives to careers and creating things, which they put a personal willingness and care to without some superficial incentive behind it like money. I realize that can be difficult to believe with capitalism's very meaning being money and people being brain washed into thinking that their every reason for being and life source revolves around the economy, but it's true.
EternalSage07 1 year ago 5
Oh sure I'd shove a big crystal into my forehead!
Andreazor 1 year ago
@CiniCraft you ARE the man ,i never played 'diablo' or 'orcs and humans' because ,i never had D.O.S. installed as my operating system so this is the first time i can see those cinematics
xXxXTravisBickleXxXx 1 year ago
That is so stupid..so our heroic knight comes to save us all...and then takes his crystal and tries to gain Diablo's power??? LOL
Luckyrob72 1 year ago
@Luckyrob72 not quite. he takes the crystal in order to contain diablo. obviously it doesn't work out lol
vampirekid5490 1 year ago
@vampirekid5490 lol xD
Luckyrob72 1 year ago
i'm going to have nightmares tonight...
vetusdecus 1 year ago
I have an itch on my head... Oh hey look, a perfect scratching device!... Oh wait!! NOOOooo!!!!!.....
MijnZagen 1 year ago
Is Diablo p2p?
sickpuppiesfan9 1 year ago
@sickpuppiesfan9 nope free if you get the cd
NoobTubre 1 year ago
Lol never played this game im into World of warcraft :D
LucilleBrine 1 year ago
@LucilleBrine diablo has its own story
Vandenidas 1 year ago
@LucilleBrine Try this its alot better. Instead of taking on 2 at a time in tbc (turn based combat) you can take on twenty or more at the same time.
Rebal2118 1 year ago
I've never p`layed Diablo in my life, and I don't understand any cinematic, what the hell happened in that town? It's horrible
tincho0501 1 year ago
What he did didn't make sense. I would have just pulled it out and carried the body off. Too hell with that stone, literally!
jay2tails 1 year ago
Haha! the ending is very funny would'nt you agree?
Dklonmy 1 year ago
i feel both one and three are stupid due to him being such a strong warrior why would he fall to insanity and also why would he be so stupid as to think he alone could contain Diablo the lord of terror so i think ending storie two is the best but choose for your self
DukeVolmont 1 year ago
I love Diablo i really do but the ending i have always thought was just a tad retarded...Now there are two stories about the ending one is the warrior though he could contain Diablos power and two is the horror and evil took over his mind and took control of his body without him knowing it untill it was to late and ending up with Diablo having a new host...now that i think about it there are three stories and the third not unlike the secend he whent insane and smashed a rock into his head...
DukeVolmont 1 year ago
The ending was very funny ^^
Dklonmy 2 years ago
I think the last cinimatic was stupid, why would you want to become something your tried to destroy?
Hyruku12 2 years ago 3
you're trying to contain Diablo's power
Loyalistable 2 years ago 21
Because the warrior wanted to fight the demon within his body. He thought that as long as he took control of Diablo, he won't roam anywhere else spreading his terror. However, it was Diablo's plan all along to enter the warrior and possess him because he wanted to take control of a body that was stronger than the one he was formerly in.
Quaiowe 2 years ago 3
@Hyruku12
He had to do it to contain diablo's in his soul stone.
ironmonnkey15 2 years ago
@Hyruku12 cuz just killing diablo kills him not really lol.. as u might seen after our hero took the soulstone away diablos body falled apart.. and all we saw was another human body with a whole in his head.. so its clear that diablo once entrapped many people to be at sanctuary. with destroying the soulstone in hells forge u might have killed diablo or made it impossible for him to enter sanctuary.. thats for what everybodys waiting.. how could diablo returned? (diablo III)
ujayu 4 months ago
fantastic game!
StevoElsupremo 2 years ago 16
the hero could have just throw it in the pit of fire
dullKnife 2 years ago
I think the stone drove him insane just from being near it and holding it. Kind of like the ring on Lord of the Rings.
JarethGT 2 years ago
ah...well atleast he became the strongest diablo so far lol diablo become a wrecking machine on diablo 2 thnx to the dark wanderer :) aka the hero :)
dullKnife 2 years ago
hey that sound when he is taking out the soulstone is the same sound as the starcraft zerg egg.
CaIgaryFIames 2 years ago
isn't nice to have a diamod in your head? :)
IsthisFinland 2 years ago 3
when i was little i was always confused this with Warcraft 1, 'cause they look so familliar in cinematics. I assume that those 2 games are made by a exactly same team. Diablo 2 just never get a same hype like first, but it's still a good game.
SwornReaper 2 years ago
No, the games wheren't made by the same team, as Blizz North was a dev Blizzard had Vivendi buy, the cinematics team was probably the same for all Blizzard games though.
ciobanica 2 years ago
haha, the whole famous game has just 4 min of cinematic . But it was number 1 for me at that time
phuyem 2 years ago
First WoW chinematic has just an intro but its even longer than this game chinematic lol.and its JUST the intro xD
how ever diablo is ok
myttn 2 years ago
this cinematic is dark and spooky. fuck diablo 3 is like a fantasy rpg with all the flashy shit and all the glitters and all the bling. its more cartoony
GabJero 2 years ago
sir diablo 3 looks awesome so far and it still DOES look gloomy and dark.
atleast diablo 3 isn't looking out to look like flyff/ro or something. Think about it. Could you imagine a cutsey chibi diablo/baal/meph?
the screenshots/movies that are already released look great and the world still does look like it's typical dark/gloomy self. so why you think it looks cartoony/glittery i don't know.
feh2 2 years ago
but brotha! diablo 3 gonna well probably need those high tech video cards like red alert 3 which sucks abit but hey depends on the gamer :)
dullKnife 2 years ago
i dont know either LOL
GabJero 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
diablo 3 has no fucking story line.
TheHeavenlyfall 2 years ago
@TheHeavenlyfall
Yea wasn't the story supposed to end with the second diablo? Because I remember blizzard saying that Diablo 2 was the last.
ironmonnkey15 2 years ago
hehe diablo 2 was,is and always will be the shit :))
TheHeavenlyfall 2 years ago
make sense next time
Onkelfoffel 1 year ago
Make sense with what?
TheHeavenlyfall 1 year ago
why did albrecht die
D4rkDr4g00n 2 years ago
You would die to if you had a giant hole in your Forhead
04zaz 2 years ago 3
id stick that in my head. become a demon. be kinda cool. control people, spread fear, etc etc etc.
sodumb123 2 years ago
the hero of diablo 1 so stupid he should have thrown the thing at the bottom of the ocean instead of stabbing himself with it
silverrayd 2 years ago
If he threw that crystal, someone may have take it and Diablo would've posses the man's/woman's mind.
He thought he coud handle diablo.
In the other hand, he had no choise.
Hellsing1138 2 years ago
Why not give it to the angels?
darkness007666 2 years ago
if he did that
then a fish would take it
and then Diablo would be a Gay fish
Chomperz32 2 years ago
Fuck, Diablo 3 looks like a fucking cartoon with a non-grim WoW kiddy girl look.
JooKed 2 years ago
thats what I said about diablo 2 when it was coming out
GeneralHasslehoff 2 years ago
They should re-release diablo 1 with more stuff :D
W1ndir 2 years ago 2
they should do a remake of 1&2 using the unreal3 engine and have havok physics. (hell, let's get some guys and make a homebrew version!!! who's with me?)
BillyCauseyjr 2 years ago 3
That'd rule
cynicaldemon 2 years ago
Man, I remember when this first came out ages ago. Caught it on a demo disc. Good times....
FascistFemale 2 years ago
I STILL have the full version, not the expansion, thou.
Hellsing1138 2 years ago
this is my guess for diablo 3 since it didnt say bals soullstone was destroyed baal is going to return and resseruct his brothers and cause a massive army of hell to take over the entire Diablo world unless Tyreal didnt die in the catatrophic explosion he has a few tricks up his sleeve to kick ass
ZombieRedeemer 2 years ago
I DONT GET THAT INTRO SCENE! Is it because i have the battle chest version of D?
crazyiproshow 2 years ago
i find diablo interesting after reading Siggard and Sarkanyle's tale on demonsbane 800 years before Diablo 1
ryubakura27722 2 years ago
hmm I wonder what this soulstone does?
Jeimuzu185 3 years ago
it is were the soul of the prime evils were sealed off if i remember correctly, and corrupted the soulstone by the treachery of Izual
ryubakura27722 2 years ago
the hero was under diablo´s influence.
diablo makes him confusing. so,the hero thought if he shove the crystal in his own head, he could control diablo.
but we know it all better...this isn´t working
DraconiInfernalus 3 years ago 3
Hmmm, lets see here, I save the world from the devil incarnate, he has a shiny gem sticking out of his head, the other guy that was just possessed by him lies dying on the floor, I... Take said crystal and shove it in my... head? At what point did this seem a good idea? It wasn't necessary for him to do it...
lannyboy333 3 years ago
yes it was if the crystal doesnt hve a body it gets destory n diablo returns
Freakypyromanic 3 years ago
for short, a good reason for a sequel.
And if I think about this deeply, this is one of the few good reason why tyreal should've been there to guide the hero. Or if the hero only knew about how to perfectly destroying the stone, there's no point in shoving that hard stone in his head. Ouch!
bastardjustice 2 years ago
If it takes balls to shove a crystal into your head, how come the Rogue did it as well? She a shemale or something?
vOddy75 3 years ago 5
Looooooooool!! No you didn't. Hahaha! ROFL.
outlawstar15a2 3 years ago
so, what, he had no legs at the end? creepy.
persianscomeandgetth 3 years ago
Awesome, brings back memories.
w3stfa11 3 years ago
When you think about it, it really takes...err...balls to shove a crystal into your head. Even worse, a crystal of that size and shape and with the devil in it! :D
FreddeX91 3 years ago
lmao, not just balls, BIG BALLS :)
Nubtrain 3 years ago 2
brass balls.
bastardjustice 2 years ago
Hmmm Never seen the Butcher one even though i have finneshed the game 2 times... Thanks! :D
terrorblades 3 years ago
This Buthcer vid was not used in the game, its more of a deleted scene
Vanguard5xy 3 years ago