New 5x5 Parity Algorithm

[808darkhands]

thanks buddy !

[superflymonky]

fucking balls im in a similar case except the fact (being the red-blue and yellow-blue edges) they face on the same sides except the red-blue wing edges are opposite facing if you can check out my channel and please comment witha link on how i can solve please help me

[luckysolve]

(Rr)2 (Ff)2 U2 r2 U2 (Ff)2 (Rr)2 will also work for the same thing

[2StrokeDirtBikeRider]

Thanks!

[Mataulemetru]

a bit useless with the flipping algo

[Nonor828]

THANK YOU!!

[megacubeguy]

thanks

[Easycoreissexy]

very cool



[JLohman711]

Thank You! Solving my new 5x5 and I had this exact parity case on my last 2 edges.

[beemer252025]

It's an hperm

[sebucwerd]

omg it's 2 gen!!!!!

[vgybhu765]

TYSM !!! finally, now i got all the parity algorithms memorized! this was the hardest one to find. thanks :)

[jasonlee7777]

can i use double layer turn for this algorithm?

[modernwarfare2noob]

thank you!!!! you made it possible for me 2 solve the 5x5 for the first time!!

[pacificaspieler]

really cool algo! thx 5*

[JDoucette]

Isn't this the same as on bigcubes . com / 5x5x5 / lastedges . html for the 1st of 2 "double wing swaps" algorithms: (Uu)2 (Rr)2 F2 u2 F2 (Rr)2 (Uu)2 (except I solve it with the cube oriented as you do). I think of it as swaping the 4 inner pieces, not swapping the 2 center pieces. I believe this algorithm is faster.

[RJA10001]

I was looking everywhere for this !I thought "oh this will just be another dumb algorithm I won't need but it IS!!!

[ThieflordZ5]

Dang, that's really neat.

BTW, you can also do it with Rw and Rw2, it also swaps the UR and UL Tredge (3 paired edges)

[Tips4Cube]

theres a faster one for the 4x4

[thekirbderekson]

nice job buddy, i've come accross it too, it is called an orientation parity, one mistake it flip flops oppisite corners in the plane of the parity, and oppsoite edges in the plane of the parity the corners flip front to back , the edges fli left to right.

[marvinerzz]

alg is good, but it's not a parity(in my opinion). it's just another one of those common combinations of edges that are very irritating, but occurs very rarely. thanks for the alg though. BTW, its not very easy to memorize, sorry coz i'm a dumbass.LOL

[Antall18]

thx a lot i finally know this one

[gegerrrr22]

Thankss!! You Rock!!! GbU

[muldimedia25]

klasse danke suche seid einer stunde nach diesem griff

5 sterne von mir

[jsn1der]

this alg is very silimlar to an alternative H perm for doing bigger cubes permutation alg and one handed too.

[darkangel2347]

I have tested this alg for a 7x7. And here's the results. Use slices 5,6,7: Swap slice 4. Use slices 6,7: Swap slices 3,4,5. Use slice 5: Swap slices 3,5: Use slice 6: Swap slices 2,6. Use slices 5,7: Swap slices 2,4,6. Use slices 5,6: Swap slices 2,3,5,6. A real time saver on a 7x7.

[Chrisbordenca]

Nice job man!

[zipdog12]

Wow, this certainly beats having to use two long parity algs...I'm going to learn this one thanks!

[4EverTrying]

Great algorithm. It applies to all big cubes and it does not change the colors of the centers (or even move the centers) at all.

However, note that you are not switching the two center-center pieces, but the two pairs of complimentary edge pieces.

Good job. This algorithm is very useful for all kinds of cubes!

[magichristo]

lol this algorithm doesnt work for me. sorry

[darkangel2347]

I have used this alg for a 5x5 cube and it is a real time and frustration saver for me.

[coolcuber32]

helped w/ 7x7

[fruble1]

Lol,you've misspelled it....;).

[ice4fire6]

Nice:)

[AbGretsch]

lol you droped it.... :)

[billytim7]

i found that in 5 min

[fergieboy10]

good job a lot of people care

(sarcasim ; )

[skullskates09]

thx

[yogonu]

Nice alg easy to memorize too.

[Randysh3r3]

i get it alot

[thepinoys]

thanks!

[rubiksflakes4547]

that's not parity. :B

[Henkeace]

yes it is a parity error on the edges

[xkiesterx]

you don't need to do just little r turns. you can turn both slices, r and R, with the r moves. it will flip both corners but that shouldn't matter unless you're waiting to solve this partiy until the 3x3 stage.

[fanwuq]

z Uu2 Rr2 F2 u2 F2 Rr2 Uu2

is the same. I like this one though. It is longer but 2 gen.

[UKSpeedCuber]

That isn't 2 gen is it? Your turning three faces so it would be 3 gen.

[SuperMoo332]

whats the "3rd" face then

[seanoreilly111]

thats not really a parity, if your smart with your edge swaping then you will never run into this

[ottowaton]

ya really

[GoogleElixr]

hey i tried that but i need to figure out how to switch the wings not the centers any ideas?

[Arycke]

Yes, the algorithm to switch JUST the wing edges is (with the two edges you want to switch in the upper right hand side and lower right hand side with them vertical like this: 000x0 00000 00000 00000 000x0

with the x's being the wing edges you wish to switch) l' 2U l' 2U 2F l' 2F r 2U r' 2U 2l. If you want a video explanation as well, watch Rob's video on how to solve the 5x5 (the parity video). Hope this helps!!

[Arycke]

oops about that last one lol, the first row is the first row on the top (if you are looking at the top) and the last one is the bottom heh. sorry bout that lol

[toOma30]

Thank you master i solve 5x5 :D

[tommyv331992]

nice, short and easy to remember.

it will come in handy, but i haven't ran into that parity yet.

[tommyv331992]

haha speak of the devil, i just did.

[Burnokkk]

Hi. Lol

[ImaginaryHuman072889]

nice algorithm, but to be totally correct, you should add another U2 at the end of it

[aceyave]

What Kinda Of Cube Ya Using??

[taco2606]

eastsheen?

[Mixolydian87]

I hate your voice.

[HBMAN1995]

I hate your guts.

[whauk]

i would use this alg:

(Uu)2 (Rr)2 F2 u2 F2 (Rr)2 (Uu)2

[ben1996123]

your voice is annoying

[adnan971]

lol

[mikebansain]

oops, nvm what I said, this is already an algorithm, i got confused with the color's and which sides they are on.

[coopersacatfilms]

It is the same case, just a different algorithm.

[Danielleclain]

hi

i saw your video , but could you please explain more how you figure it out?

i'd like to understand it to create my owns alg.thanks you very much

[ciscou]

This is NOT a parity case. You can handle this situation with any 3x3x3 algorithm that switches 2 opposite edges, like a T permutation (moving 2 external layers)

[mikebansain]

ya and also you can avoid this case by simply switching the outer layers and doing a different algorithm. but good find nevertheless

[runnerban]

hmm just like the 3x3 h perm i use for one handed solves but hats still very simple

[esquimalt1]

the r's don't have to be lower case it will still do it