Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (262)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thanks, Andrew, for your concise, and amusing, history lesson.

  • I wish ratings weren't disabled because I really liked this video.

  • You idiotic Neocons don't care for the constitution at all until it suits you. You sir, are a hypocrite and a fool; and it shows. @007CTHULHU007

  • @normalkuriboh You don't even know what the word neocon means. In the context of your sentence you are referring to Democrats as Neocons.

  • @Robbob9933 Neocon means Neoconservative. Yes, I do know what it means. I assumed he was a neocon because

    A) He is watching Andrew Klavan- A flaming Neocon

    B) He is somehow comparing Ron Paul to Chamberlin, like they are somehow similar. He is obviously an interventionist, fan of undeclared wars, and nation-builder.

    Of course these aren't exactly party specific, but again- Andrew Klavan.

    If you couldn't see that you are obviously also an idiot.

  • @normalkuriboh Neocon is only a shortend version of neoconservative. Neoconservstive IS NOT the definition of Neocon. Neoconservitism is the polar opposite of modern liberalism which in turn is the polar opposite of traditional liberalism. Only democrats and modern liberals look to the Constitution when it suits their needs. Neocons/ervatives look to the Constitution and the document governing the land.

  • @Robbob9933 Wrong again. That would be equating Neocons with classical liberals, which is a joke. Libertarians are classical liberals; Neocons are warmongerers. Neocons are interventionists. Undeclared wars are unconstitutional. Classical liberals were concerned with liberty. Neocons are concerned with international vigilantism and things like the Patriot Act. You know; security over liberty. Don't pretend like you value the Constitution at all if you support anything Neocons support.

  • @normalkuriboh (1/2)Classical Liberals are about preserving indivudual liberty, small government, and are opposed to social welfare. Modern liberals follow Marxist, Leninist, Maoist, Hitleresque, and Mousillinic teachings. Modern Conservatives are basicly Mousillinic. Congress does not have to use the words Declaration of War, all they have to to is authorize the President to take action. Iraq 1 and 2 + Afganastan are Constitutional in nature.

  • @normalkuriboh (2,2) Both Bush's sought Congressional approval before shot 1 was fired by us. By your understanding, Obama is a Neocon for interveining in Lybia and his desire to intervein in Syria. The Patriot Act is an abonination to the Constitution. It passed both houses with overwealming support of Dems and Reps. If you are for ANY social or corporate welfare, you are against the Constitution.

  • @Robbob9933 Yes. I know. I said that. You are completely off though by your invocation of Hitler, Lenin, Mousillini, and then Marx (For some reason). You are invoking groups that are on the opposite side of the political spectrum, aside from their love of big government (Except for Marx, he hated it).

  • @normalkuriboh Mousillini would have totally approved of the corporate bailouts.  I observed OWS in NY and they would have made Hitler proud with their Jew baiting and assulting. All of the people I mentioned had Socialist Philosophies. Fasism is corporate socialism.

  • @Robbob9933 Socialism is workers' ownership of the means of production. The Soviet Union was not socialism, as even Lenin knew. Fascism is the merger of corporation and state. One thing i would advise against is the throwing around of words carelessly. The word Socialism hardly even means anything anymore in America because of this idiocy. I live in Texas, and my parents are a part of the Tea Party; I have been to the rallies. The amount of racism is sickening. It's not all bad, but mostly...wow

  • @normalkuriboh There is a difference between socialism and socialist. Socialism is the political manifistation while socialists are those who believe, practice, promote, etc... socialism. You can be a socialist in the absence of socialism. The entire philosophy of wealth redistribution is socialistic in nature. Reward without effort and the class warfare mentality are also socialistic ideal Essentially socialism is predicated upon jealousy.

  • @normalkuriboh As to your Tea Party comment. Several left and right leaning orgainzations have major rewards for anyone who can produce verifiable audio and video that can pass forensic analysis of any Tea Party gathering where racism is tolerated much less encouraged. No one has stepped forward. Depicting Omaba as the modern Batman Joker character is not racist. The only thing racist with Obama is the pass he has been given by the press.

  • "racism is tolerated much less encouraged." Robbob9933

    How do you feel about Rush Limbaugh saying Obama is our "man-child president of color"?

    GLenn Beck saying Obama's only agenda is reparations and that he hates white people and white culture and Jesse Peterson claiming Obama hates white people? All on Fox.. Coulter saying Obama's first accomplishment was being born 1/2 black? If you check my birthers are racists video - you'll find plenty of iconic racism from conservative sites.

  • @HopeForPeaceNow (1/?) Most of what you are attibuting to media personalities stem from Obama's relationship with Rev, Jeramiah Wright. No one but no no one attends a church on an at least weekly basis (according to Obama) without agreeing what comes from the pulpit. Rev Wright hates white people just as the KKK. Anti white vile was and is part and parcel of Wright's sermons. Obama spent 20 years soaking up that hate vs challanging and leaving.

  • @HopeForPeaceNow (2/?) If you call this guild by association, na think again. I shold have said this in part 1. Why is it that those on the left insist that ANYONE right of them justify or explain anything said by anyone. If you actullay listened to them and not White House of Media Matters talking points, you would have to context of those statements. But I will close with this, the birthers have it all wrong.

  • @HopeForPeaceNow (3/3) Place of birth has nothing to do with "a Natural Born Citizen".

    There were two bodies of law explecitly referenced in the ennumerated powers. One of these, the 'laws of nations' the other referencing high seas (commonly referred to as Admiraly Law). In the Laws of nations there is the definition of Natural Born that would surprise everyone including the birthers. The intent of natural born clause was to prevent someone not American from holding this office.

  • What constitutional provision grants Congress authority to force people to buy health insurance? I believe that would be the general welfare clause (Article 1, Section 8).

  • @451ianDragonist Do you know that Christianity is correct? The world around us reveals that G-d DOES exist, and the historical evidence reveals that Jesus Christ really did come to this earth and there is overwhelming evidence that Jesus Christ really did physically rise from the dead. Jesus is coming again and the signs of the end times that were foretold in the Bible are coming to pass.

  • @marionetemanJ Jesus also said to care for the poor. If he were a real person and alive today, he'd be burned as a socialist by the right wing. Does that mean anything to you?

  • Besides! The Europeans WOULD know what's best for a country they will NEVER have to:

    Set foot in

    Have to live under it's power

    Have to pay it's taxes

    Be defended by the country

    Live in

    Vote in

    Have the voted in leaders make decisions that affect their lives

    So c'mon, we should listen to the people who have 0 power here and are separated by an ocean.

  • "Assorted men wearing wigs" - LOL

  • Comment removed

  • ..then Ban you from the video, so you can't reply back with any more sane rational thoughts and Facts.

    Beware the Paul Cattle. Don't let them lead you astray with their wannabe-Constitutionalist claims and ...outright propaganda.

    Ron Paul would TRULY have done better running as a Democrat challenging Obama. Two nuts in a shell. He would steal votes from Obama. If he runs, however it will be out of crazy old man SPITE and everyone would hate him and his CATTLE forever if Obama won because of it.

  • So...we have plagues of these Paul CATTLE roaming Conservative videos making asinine comments now, because they see the word Conservative and think it means "mentally unstable incredibly naive old man thoughts".

    Converse with these morons at your own risk..risk of being insulted. That's about all they do. Just like arguing with the most stupid of liberals it is with every one I've conversed with..and they always lose and get mad..if it's their video commentary they whine, delete your comments..

  • In fact I've seen Paul Cattle that have been worse than liberals banning me from video commentary just for speaking the Truth that they cannot argue with. Paul Cattle have wordplay. That's all they have. They claim every Conservative that doesn't support Paul is a "Neocon". Let me tell everyone what that is. A "Neocon" is a democrat turned socially liberal Republican. That's IT. Paul Cattle have tried to turn it a meaning it does not mean and never has meant so they can LABEL like liberal fools.

  • ....who Paul's supporter/cattle base are. Let's see..the KKK, Neo Nazi's, Conspiracy NUTS(of all types ESPECIALLY 9/11 inside job flakes), and drug using/addled morons that think of nothing, but legalizing whatever substance they use...doesn't matter if the world goes to HELL in a hand basket if they get to have their DOPE legally for once. God Damn morons.

    That is Ron Paul's base. Remember this fellow TRUE Conservatives when arguing with these Asshats. They are as mindless as liberals.

  • @007CTHULHU007 I'd have to disagree with you on the "base"......

    A good portion of his followers are from crappy socialist-leaning countries, like Norway, Finland, Australia, the UK, Canada, and most of Europe, because most of them want the US's financial support for their socialist misreably economically failing countries like Greece and Italy. They also want the protection of the US without actually having the US around.

    TL:DR

    Ron Cattle are about 30% Europeans that know whats best for YOU.

  • I've seen some Euro-Trash supporting him, but not so many on blowtube.

    They certainly wouldn't have us around anymore in Europe or Asia as Paul would draw in ALL our troops like the old fart fool he is. Probably causing disaster on a global scale after a time. China would try to take back Taiwan...North Korea could get antsy due to no more U.S. on the boarder...ALL muslims countries would be immensely happy that we had an old naive fool in office...and attack. Ron Chamberlain.

  • ...look Chamberlain up if you are too young or too high(Paul supporters) to remember who this was. It's no an exaggeration. In fact it may be UNDER exaggeration considering the Global politics Paul wants to ignore and in doing so likely assist the start of the next World War..perhaps the last if nukes are involved. Yes and while ignoring the world with one side of his old addled brain he proposes to revert to the failed Gold Standard while we are the National Currency....riiiight. I will...cont.

  • Beware of Ron Paul Nuts preaching against TRUE Conservatives. This is a phenomenon I've observed recently. Paul Cattle are NOT Conservatives to start with...not by the common definition of the word as us Real Conservatives know it. In fact Paul Cattle support a man that has passed ONE bill out of 630+ Bills he sponsored as a member of Congress..Ron Paul.

    A crazy old ISOLATONIST man...no not "non-interventionism" don't be a PUTZ. A crazy old man that is our 21st Century Neville Chamberlain...cont

  • Democrats may be all things which Klavan describes but Republicans pay lip service to the constitution. Klavan tells only half the truth

    Here are your choices for the 2012 presidency. It's pretty clear.

    ht tp://non-intervention.co m/1018/iowa%e2%80%99s-choice-d­r-paul-or-u-s-bankruptcy-more-­wars-and-many-more-dead-soldie­rs-and-marines/

  • George Washington died because, after developing a sore throat, his physician decided he should be bled through the neck, which in turn caused his throat to swell and he suffocated, a long and painful death.

    It is obvious that nothing from this time should be construed as a statement against the necessity of making modern medicine available to everyone.

    Besides, George was the Highest Ranking in attendance, and he had an elementary education. Just Saying.

  • @emugrogan I can see the constitution was in place there to stop histrory repeating itself. In year 1215 the magna carta The Great Charter of the Liberties of England, and of the Liberties of the Forest was also part of the basics of the constitution.Through out time people have fought for there freedom and from govenments and tyrants who ruled them with an iron fist. History repeats itself, it always has done and the only way to stop is to learn from it.

  • @emugrogan 550 BC: Slavery in persian was band and cyrus the great followed this ban to varying degrees and that was avery long time ago. but in rome and greece there where slave revolts and people fighting for there freedom, there so much to learn from past governments and old laws that give people there right and stop the endless war for freedom and controle

  • The implication that the outdated Constitutional standard of infinitely small government is somehow relevant to UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE today is asinine.

    POLITICAL CREATIONISM is what your suggesting. The Constitution is over 200 years old. It is not the exact word of god. The population of the United States was 3 million when the Constitution was drafted, It is now 300 million. The standard your proposing is irrational.

  • There was a time when politicians could be held to account under the Constitution. With Leftists stacking our courts with people who think the Constitution is "just a document"... the Rule of Law is fading fast.

    After being found illegally bringing Chinese cash to the 1996 Clinton/Gore re-election campaign, Al Gore famously quipped that there is no more "controlling authority" to compel him and his ilk to obey the Constitution.

    He meant you. You forgot your duty.

  • In fact, up until the 1950s the Constitution was treated as THE LAW.

    Legislators actually had to demonstrate that the laws they passed were allowed by the Constitution. Remember women's Right to Vote? The Supreme Court correctly ruled it was not a Constitutionally protected Right because it was not in the Constitution. It had to be added.

    How about the Right to Keep and Bear Arms? The Supreme Court correctly stated that if a short shotgun has combat use, it is Constitutionally protected.

  • The Alien and Sedition Acts created after the Constitution was a direct violation of these principles. In fact, up until the 1950s the Constitution was treated like a mere document.

    Abraham Lincoln enacted policies against slavery despite the Supreme Court's objections.

    FDR enacted New Deal policies even after the Supreme Court Packing problem, and did so even though the Court knocked anything down.

    Again, a lot of Mr.Klavan's statements make sense... if you don't know the whole story.

  • Woah this history is horrible, even looking beyond the humor. The Articles of Confederation were made in 1777 by the Continental Congress but the actual Constitution was made after the war ended, by the Federalists and Hamilton who wanted BIG Federal Government. Only half of the Constitutional Convention had actually served on the Continental Congress, and only 8 actually signed the Declaration of Independence. Thankfully remaining Revolutionaries ensured the Bill of Rights. But I liked the vid!

  • @4evaFranyify I almost decided the same, but took a step back and decided to become a motivational speaker and political commentator instead. Meddling with politics actually does entail corruptness, regardless if you want it or not.

  • Neither gradual nor silent.

  • How I WISH WE COULD HAVE STUDENTS VIEW THESE VIDEOS IN HIS SERIES! Also VOTING adults!!!! WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!

  • All good points made in the video, but there are other ways to gain power besides writing laws:

    Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws.

    Mayer Amschel Rothschild

    and that's what the big banks have. They don't even have a constitution to limit their power or an electorate to answer to.

  • "I dont understand what your saying and cant respond." - Is my new watch statement.

  • "Venti half calf Mocha Frappachinos". LMAO :)

  • In my country, I am a called a nazi because liberals are right wing in the Netherlands. In America, I would be a healthy republican who loves his country and constitution.

  • @DutchPetriot The meaning of words are inconsistent when we cross borders.

  • "Because if they were found with pens, they would be hanged by the british."

    best line of the whole thing.

  • Wow you just blew everyones mind man. I love your work.

  • Not that I don't agree with Mr Klavan, but the FED does have the power to do anything it wants. Especially when it comes to controlling you. Ah, but the constitution protects you, you say? No actually it doesn't. As a 14th amendment citizen you are subject to the jurisdiction of the FED. Meaning all their penal codes (Many of which ignore the Constitution.) are now law as far as you're concerned. You will never be free as long as you're a US citizen. Ironic?

  • This shit is for real. "...the gradual and silent encroachment of those in power..."

    Get it through your skulls.

    We need term limits!!!!!

  • our constitution is in shreds and continues to be shredded further. The founding fathers are rolling over in their graves we speak

  • Why are half the vids feezing? Sucks!

  • In the name of Allah, The beneficent the merciful.

    Quran:

    {Surah-97- the majesty (qadr) -vs-1}

    Surely we revealed it on the grand night.

    2-and what will make you comprehend what the grand night is?

    3-the grand night is better than a thousand months.

    4-the angels and the spirit (gibreel) descend in it by the permission of their lord for every affair,

    5-peace! It is till the break of the morning.

  • @quranresponse A l l ah is evil.

  • @quranresponse Allah the moon god is a false idol of those that forgot God.

    John (14:6)

    Jesus saith unto him I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

  • The LIB DEM OBAMABOT IDIOTS have a strong Aversion to the TRUTH and FACTS!!

  • Liberals think they can do whatever they want with the Constitution. Republicans say, "We like the Constitution, just not this part or that part." Pundits lie and distort.

    The Constitution is in need of updating. Either that or the way we interpret it is in need of updating. The Revolution, Civil War, Industrial Age, Depression, WWII, Vietnam, Watergate, and 9/11 have shaped this nation into a very different one from the fledging union of British colonies in which the Constitution was penned.

  • @boston1804 why dont we just keep it the way it is and think the way they thought when they wrote it

  • ...Dude..

  • Lol, crinkly brown wig men.

  • After the fall of the U.S.S.R., the little country of Belarus wrote up a Constitution.

    They elected Lukashenko President in 1994. In 1996 Lukashenko set the Constitution aside, stating "I'm doing a great job for Belarus, and we need no more elections or a Constitution."

    He is still in power today. The Belarusan average wage is $40 per month.

    Government governs best that governs the least.

  • @ricknorth77 Belarus just got a bailout from Russia! YAY!

  • @ricknorth77 Can you imagine Ali Bama trying that? lol Millions of Americans would be rushing the white house, dragging him out by his big ears and taking down anybody who tried to stop them.

  • @ricknorth77

    'Government governs best that governs the least.'

    Yep, no Republican is worthy of that honour. (despite Klavan's gross distortion of the two party system)

  • @ricknorth77 that just sucks. i dont have anything constructive or thought provoking. just... damn.

  • I always like what PJ media puts out, but for once I have to say you may not go far enough. First, Republicans have encroached on the same rights Democrats are now. Second, this encroachment has been debated since before the constitution was written, so we shoud not think the constitution was a consensus...it was a compromise. My recommendation, vote both parties and out and support the LIbertarian party. Feel free to bash readers, but think about it.

  • @muldurag

    I used to as well, until I realised they are nothing but blind advocates of Republicanism. -One half of the problem in DC.

  • Most of the people in the USA didn't want to go to war in Iraq and no war was ever declared by Congress. So where was bullet head here, the scum at PJ Media or the average braindead teabagger in 2002-3? 98% of them supported the war & the "Patriot Act" and called opponents appeasers and/or traitors. So this arsehead has 0 credibility when it comes to lecturing anyone about the Constitution. But irony is lost on the simple minded.

  • @Jakealopester Most people didn't want to go to war in Iraq? PLEASE cite your LEGITIMATE source liar! I know I won't hear back from you b/c you're lying like all good liberals do. The truth is your enemie!

    You didn't support the Patriot Act witch thwarted 14 attacks on U.S. soil & aircraft? Better be mad at Obama then b/c it expired 3 months ago & Obama extended it for another 3 years. LMAO! Bet ya didn't know that now did ya big mouth?

    Democrats ARE apeasers & traitors. They HATE America.

  • @flyboymd82 yes but the patriot act also took liberties from u i will quote BENJAMIN FRANKLIN for u "any man that will give up liberties for a little safety deserves neither liberty or safety".

  • @flyboymd82 if they don't like america ... they can get out !!!

  • @flyboymd82 you need to turn off Faux news.....you sound like a nut job

  • @MrTurnersClass What did he say that made him a 'nut job'?? Everything he said is FACT. Appeasing Illegal immigrants, appeasing muslims, appeasing gays, appeasing minorities, appeasing prisoners, apologizing all over the world for America, blaming America first for everything. WTF DON'T they appease?

    You're the brainwashed nutjob.

  • @MrTurnersClass You need to turn off CNN news.....you sound like a nut job. You just watched a video of the core democrats in power basically ignoring the existence of the constitution. WAKE UP. YOUR PARTY DOESN'T WANT YOU TO BE FREE. THEY WANT YOUR MONEY AND POWER OVER YOU.

  • @trexilll my party ignores the constitution....i do believe the patriot act was passed under George W. Bush....and he's all yours....and that was the most blatant disreguard of the constitution EVER. Turn off the Faux news and try thinking for yourself...

  • @MrTurnersClass And while we're on the subject, I don't watch Fox news, either. In fact, I don't own a television set. Most of the political news I get comes from Politico.com, some from a BBC app on my iPhone, and chit-chat with republican/democrat loonies.

  • @MrTurnersClass I'm not a Republican and I don't like Bush or his politics. Way to be an assumptive democrat! I'm libertarian, and I think the Dems/Reps are two sides of the same coin: power. The dems want us all to be one happy communist family and the reps want us all to think and be like them. Screw both of you. LIBERTY!

  • @MrTurnersClass I see you ran away from this topic..as most uninformed liberals do when they can't take being shown for what they are..liars..ignorants.

    Why do "asshats"/liberals harp on people that watch a stable truthful News Network such as FOX news? Because they tell the truth and NOTHING hurts a liberal like the Truth of the situation. Other networks are COMPLETELY controlled by liberals/ex-hippies.

    It makes sense for liberals with their low IQ's to attack the ONE network that is honest.

  • ..and they attack and use the "You must watch Faux news" like it's an insult. Yes I watch FOX news...so f'ing what? You must watch ANY of the other news networks on T.V. and Cable as they are all liberal/socialist leaning in the extreme as is READILY APPARENT to ANYONE that wishes to observe.Their bias is plain to see as the nose on your face.FOX, however I have rarely if ever seen true bias even to flaming liberal fools on their News broadcasts.The FOX "shows" are of course tilted conservative.

  • ..as ALL other video broadcasting news agencies have liberal "shows" and liberal "entertainment"/movies made special from Hollow wood.

    I tire of the IDIOTIC chant of the stupid liberal's "You must watch FOX news naaaaah" whining ignorance. If a liberal had an open mind they would see why MOST people prefer FOX cable news. They tell the damnable whole truth in their news stories. They don't lie, misdirect, insult, or make excuses for people they report on. Including fool liberal politicians.

  • @007CTHULHU007 You forget that liberals and muslims find it insulting when someone corrects them or tells the truth about what they really do. You can't live in a free society without insulting a liberal or muslim.

  • @JustBecauseTheySaySo I did forget to mention that. Thanks for pointing it out. I've said such in other commentary, however.:D

    It's true, aye.Liberals/socialists cannot STAND for the truth. It interferes with their Imagination Land where fiction is fact and falsehoods are truth.

    Just my explanation of islam in my channel commentary would drive them insane with anger at my anti-multiculturalism(which is a failed policy in socialistic America hating Europe, because it's true). I love truth myself.

  • @007CTHULHU007 The truth is they are ALL garbage. Fox used to have freedom watch but since it's cancelled there's not much left really worth it. The others may be even worse depending on the topic,program. RT has some good shows but not all.

    I wouldn't try to defend yourself watching Fox , rather try to explain that your ideas come from THINKING about the problems yourself. Democrats are sheeple, they believe whatever their leaders tell them, that's the weak spot.

  • @TWSceptic Media? FOX is not liberal tilted if you're talking about televised News Media.The "others" are COMPLETELY biased liberals/socialists and some of them are even finally ADMITTING the obvious it by showing their support for this incompetent imbecile Obama.

    I never "defend yourself watching FOX". I am not a drone. I acquire factual information from many sources. History being a main source.

    Liberals are borderline cultist in my mind due to their self imposed absurd ignorance.

  • @007CTHULHU007 Im the ex hippie???? Have you seen your pic lately? Right.....

  • @MrTurnersClass Long hair does not mean liberal..nor does it mean anything other than I have long hair. The ladies love to play with it after sex...along with other things.

    Long hair does NOT equal a liberal or ex-hippie.It's the classic "Judging a book by it's cover." children's tale. I wear a black biker's jacket a good amount of time as well.. I suppose that makes me a thug biker too eh?pfft.

    The ex-hippies now are all short haired and in Congress or the mass media playing hide the socialism.

  • @flyboymd82 where are your sources that democrats are appeasers (spelled with two p's by the way)......better start citing.....

  • @flyboymd82 What did Iraq do to us? (Aside from accept weapons we sold them?)

  • Comedy gold. Superb delivery and presentation, dude.

  • The constitution is being rubbished in order to ease the implementation of Islamic Sharia law.

  • @tygasm Like your head was?

  • i am shocked at the hatred of other people experessed here... people you do not personally know ... people that are exercising their rights that you too have... seriously guys.... your comments are scary full of hate and for what??? just because you dont agree with another person? it's like bigotry is the new "racism du jour" .... sad ...

  • @monkeygirlmom I know, huh.

    

  • @flyboymd82 I get your name now, you're a pilot (or on flight crew) and you were waterboarded by your own military employer 82 times. No wonder you're so suspicious of government.

    So how did they do it? Did they whisk you from your bed in the middle of the night, and put a black bag over your face and then ask you for all sorts of information that didn't have, and then wham... you gasped for air thinking you were drowning?

    And then again, and again, not knowing who your captor was?

  • @flyboymd82 "@DidITweetThat "only when its being attacked by fuck stick idiots like you"?? Hmm. What have I done to attack the Constitution stupid boy?"

    Nothing, I'm jsut "argueing" like you. See gets nowhere with all the insults with Nothin' backing them up.

    Only empty attacks meant to bully.

    So such my balls - dick lick! ;-D

  • @Flyboymd82 - Thanks Ass Licker. If that were the case, they could have just gone to the FISA court and ordered the Wire Taps, like the law before the Patriot Act required. In fact, they could have even gotten them retroactively, so why do you want the US looking into your business whenever they want? So they'll be ready with your clothes and shoe sizes when they bring you to the FEMA Camps?

  • He is right on the money,yet scary that This is not taught in schools!! I had to learn the constitution..today what do they learn?? We need to take back our country..we are sinking & there is no regard for the constitution. God Help US!!

  • Not quite sure what the big deal is about universal health care in the states. Up here in Canada (which is very similar to the U.S.A.) it is deemed important to care for people who are sick and hurting no matter what their background of income level.

  • THESE ARE ALL DEMOCRATS YOU SEE, CHILDREN

  • We need to get rid of those filthy redcoats in washington, again!

  • I remember having to pass a Constitution test to graduate from High School.

  • it is very sad that a lot of Americans haven't even READ their constitution and would believe ANYTHING they hear or see on TV.Dear God please open their brains to truth

  • God bless and protect America... dude.

  • I stand to applaud*!!!

    *conditional on you recognizing that the vast majority of members of EACH party, Dem AND Rep, are power-hungry elitists.

  • The exception and NOT THE RULE.  I guess no one remembers 9/11/2001 to 2008 where we asked to give up freedom to promote.... democracy and freedom.

    Ever heard of the Patriot Act? Guantamo? Water-boarding and "Harsh Interrogation Techniques"? (HIT - great acronym, who came up with that? Cheney? (heh heh heh...)

    Listen Klavan, I think you missed your "civic" lesson on this one. So much so, that I don't even want to waste my time responding to any of your other videos.

  • @DidITweetThat Are...are you fucking stupid?

  • @itachi705 - NO, because if I was going to challenge somones ideas or thoughts, I wouldn't just insult them, because that would be stupid... and unproductive.

    So, do us all a favor and ask a question about what you are so fucking brilliant about, or just stick your balls out there, and tell me what I've got wrong. And then we'll know why they call you numbnuts.

    Thanks dick wipe for your insight.

  • @DidITweetThat lol Waaah, baby gonna cry?

  • @DidITweetThat I find it hilarious that you left wing libnuts trash the Constitution & couldn't give a shit about it UNTIL Muslims want to put a victory Mosque on the 9/11 site you speak of, THEN you(and Obama LOL!)wrap yourselves in it!

    Are you aware the patriot act prevented 13 terror attacks on U.S. soil in those 8 years? Are you aware it expired 4 months ago but OBAMA extended it another 4 years?

    I think YOU missed your "civics" lesson dumbass! Waterboarding isn't torture!

  • @flyboymd82 - Yes I am aware that the 111th congress renewed the Patriot Act & Obama signed it. It still doesn't make it right, only "legal".

    I've always loved the Constitution, and don't use it when convenient, only when it's being attacked by fuck stick idiots like you.

    I don't know how the Patriot Act stopped 13 attacks, we're they all being leveled by Americans? because that's what the Patriot Act authorizes is Spying on Americans... against the Constitution.

    Can I come over & WB you?

  • @DidITweetThat "only when its being attacked by fuck stick idiots like you"?? Hmm. What have I done to attack the Constitution stupid boy?

    Seems to me that YOUR party is the ONLY party that attacks it. Obummer even said its a "deeply flawed" document & needs revision. Liberal Democrats are who FORCED unconstitutional socaial healthcare down our throats AGAINST the will of 77%. Dems found abortion in it. They found gay marriage in it, but somehow they say gun rights AREN'T THERE! LMAO!

  • @flyboymd82 The same way buttheads like you got us into Iraq against the will of most of the people? Doesn't the Constitution say something about Congress declaring war or is that obsolete so fascist hawks can have their way

  • @Jakealopester How soon libtards forget. Nearly ALL of the Congress(Dems & Repubs)supported war on Iraq & gave Bush the green light you idiot! Then when it got a little rough the pathetic Democrats wanted to give up, threw it all in Bush's lap & ran like they had nothing to do with it. Typical, spinless, characterless Democrats!

    How about you take a look at a video called "Democrats before the Iraq war"? You can see Peosi, Ried, Kerry, Hillary, Bill, Gore & all the rest calling for war! LOL!

  • @flyboymd82 It sounds like the only education you have is from FOX & talk radio. Scheisskopf, I am not defending the Democrats. But since you seem like a typical stupid right wing pig, the Constitution says that only Congress is supposed to declare war, and they didn't. So if the Constitution means so damn much to you, why aren't you upset over that? Oh right, now you are all libertarians since Obama won, while the same little neo-theo-con twerps spat all over Ron Paul in 2008

  • @Jakealopester Congress authorized the overthrow of Saddam jackass. Since you're such a constitutional scholar, why don't you complain about Kennedy getting 54,000 of our troops killed in Viet Nam? Congress never declared war on them. Gee in fact they never Declared war on North Korea either. Hmm. looks like the DEMOCRATS set that president didn't they filthy scumbag!

    You fucks SPIT on the Constitution unless of course you're using it to defend terrorists & illegal invaders.

    Hypocrite moron.

  • @flyboymd82 We are not talking about Vietnam nor was Bush the only one to do it. But if the Constitution meant so much to you, then you should be outraged that we go to war without even a legal declaration, no matter JFK, Truman or the Bush's. I ain't no stereotype liberal as your 0 dimensional mind imagines, but I knew Iraq was a crock from the word go. So it made me sick to see all you miserable little cretins go to war while getting a tax cut too, real sacrifice there, you risked 0, coward.

  • @Jakealopester Yeah you don't want to admit that your "fascist"(as YOU called it)Democrats started the trend of disregarding the Constitution do you? Lets just overlook that one huh? LOL! Idiot.

    Oh you don't like the middle class getting a tax cut do you? We aren't paying enough for you are we? We all owe you fucking lowlife scum a living don't we? FUCK YOU! I don't owe you SHIT, and I fought in the first gulf war while you were shitting you diapers you little piece of shit. What did U risk?

  • @flyboymd82 People have been disregarding the Constitution from Day 1, that is why we have courts.. You truly are the type of brutal, small minded creep that the right (especially PJ Media) & the military attracts. If you are going to start a war, which helped us into deep deficits, most powers in history don't CUT taxes b4 entering a LONG WAR. How are we supposed to pay for the war if the cretins like you who supported it want a tax cut first? Such logic, everything is some lib con bs to you

  • @Jakealopester Oh so NOW its Okay to disregard the Constitution b/c I just PROVED Democrats only wrap themselves in it when they can use it to hurt this nation?? How typically hypocritical of a libnut!

    I've forgotten more education than you've ever had you little fuckin weasel. I'm sure PWNING the shit outta you with the truth on this thread aren't I? Badmouthing the military as being "stupid" too? Imagine that. Like I said you're all traitors.

    End handouts to Democrat scumbags will do it!

  • @Jakealopester Oh, and I note with great amusment that you had nothing to say about the the video, couldn't cite a reference for your FALSE claim that "most didn't want to go to war with Iraq", 90% of Democrats in Congress authorizing action against Iraq and ignored the fact that Obama extended the Patriot Act. LOL!

    How embarrassing for you ya lying little, brainwashed, propagandist, RAT!

    I'll put my education up against yours ANYTIME. In a battle fo the wits, you're unarmed.

  • @flyboymd82 What is ironic is most of the shites running around today protesting, dressing like 1776 & whining about the Constitution were all for the war in 2002 and then called all the opponents traitors like you just did. What education do you have besides neocon right wing dreck like this? Yes I would love to see some chicken hawks like you get some hot blowback, since you love war so much, (only when someone else is suffering or paying the bills.)

  • @Jakealopester Whats Ironic about it? You shitheads on the left ARE traitors and appeasers. You wanted to DEFUND our troops in wartime. You told terrorists how we track them. You hated the Patriot act. You called terrorists "Freedom fighters". You called our troops murderers & terrorists & call true terrorists "Insurgeants". You losers SUCK!

    Did you get upset when Obama trashed the Constitution with socialized healthcare FORCED upon the unwilling majority? How about finding abortion in it? LOL

  • @DidITweetThat BTW, the 13 terror attacs were thwarted by the Patriot Act by wiretapping Americans who were KNOWN to aid terrorists. YES there are a LOT of American Muslims dumbass! LOOK IT UP!

    Sure come on over & WB me again. I already did it in the military. FUCKING TORTURING BASTARDS! LOL! Anything to bash America huh??

    Ask John McCain what torture is ye retard.

  • @restanoc I agree with you about pulling ALL parties, or even INDIVIDUALS in to the argument.

    I love arguing on Facebook with people who call themselves Conservatives, and tell of how they love the Constitution, and then tell me they support Prop 8 in CA and the Immigration Bill in AZ and want to eliminate parts of the 14th amendment.

    I usually ask them, why, if they love this country and constitution so much, haven't they flown a plane into the Washington Monument to prove it.

    Really.

  • @DidITweetThat if i said i loved you would you hold it against me?

  • @DidITweetThat; I'm gonna pass on Prop 8 and the 14th amendment.

    But seriously, there's nothing wrong with the Arizona law. The allegations of unconstitutionality are dead wrong, the "fascist" angle is unfounded, and possible abuse by racist cops is negligible.

    The only legit argument against it is that maybe, perhaps it might impede local law enforcement from doing their regular jobs, but that's still stretching it.

  • I agree with everything Klavan said, although I would do one thing different. If I were trying to bring to the forefront the abuse and the outright disregard of the Constitution that our ancestors wrote, I would show examples from all parties of government, not just Dems. I myself am a Rep., but in todays climate, when trying to spread the truth, it shouldn't come across as biased. It's sad that the state of our country has been so split. Red or Blue, Rep or Dem, we are all American,

  • so the problems we face now and in the future will be felt by all, not just individual parties. We need to come together to make a change, cause if we don't, the freedoms our ancestors fought for will be slowly whittled away, right under our noses, because we as Americans have become to complacent, just because we feel we can't do anything, even if we tried. Rest assured if we don't try, our children will live in a very different place, and not for the better I assure you.

  • @KiraJenLove while I disagree with everything you've said for various reasons, you must at least admit that it is not an enormous leap of faith to see how public healthcare can be construed as Constitutional. It is nowhere near as eggregious as the actor implies that it is.

  • @peacefrog630 Yeah. I can how its an enormous leap of faith.

    The role of government in the general welfare clause, is to PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE. It does not say PROVIDE THE CITIZENS WITH WELFARE.

  • Awesome

  • Comment removed

  • Is this guy serious? Article 1, Section 8 in the *enumerated* powers of congress is: The Congress shall have power To lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence and *general welfare* of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States.

    If this guy is trying to show that politicians are idiots, he shouldn't have to search to hard, but he's clearly mistaken on the law.

  • @peacefrog630 This.

  • @peacefrog630 - I don't think that socialized medicine can be considered to fit under "general welfare". I would see it more as, for example, building a levee for New Orleans or something. People didn't need socialized medicine 200 years ago, and yet people are physiologically the same as they were then. The differences between then and today that contribute to many sick people in this country are sedentary lifestyles, harmful lifestyles, not enough exercise, and poisoned food, water and air.

  • @peacefrog630 - (cont'd) - another thing is that 80% of all illnesses are self-induced, so it seems to be that prevention would be more cost-effective than the expensive "cure" of socialized medicine.

  • Oh well you tried, 37 thousand views is alright but hot for words has boobs :(

  • This is good an true. What is scary is that there is a lack of respect for the rule of law. When just laws are not respected by those in power violence results. That's why the old people in wigs wrote "to establish justice and ensure domestic tranquility". I fear we are in such a period of lawlessness that violence is not far off.

  • love the video Andrew, but your words fall upon deaf ears. The left are not interested in hearing facts that are not created at some starbucks by some left wing NYT's blogger high on his own inflated egotistical self importance. The youth of today are to dumbed down from public school curriculum to even begin to remotely fathom the meaning and value of your words. Decades of liberal effort to stupify (yes thats a word now) to stupify our youth through the public school system have paid off.

  • The Constitution is very specific in stating that the powers of the federal gov't are VERY limited and can not encroach on individual states. this is the way it was intended but not the way it is practiced. this is why today the federal courts are turning over laws which were VOTED IN by the people in AZ and CA, when the federal court really has no such power to do so. that being said, it makes me sick how liberals have no regard for the constitution, unless it benefits them.