Lord of the Flies shows correctly how humanity, devoid of God's moral law descends into animal behaviors..and can be nothing more...the point his book to the chagrin of his contemporary evolutionists didn't like...after all we are always evolving into better creatures....really!!
lord of the flies=the devil ; flies tend to flock to things that are dead and decaying . and since simon feels and sees things to others don't , he feels the devil speak to him through the pig basically telling him , that everyone is born with an innate human evil - savagery, for example - that's taking over the other's .
@ FireFlysNeverDie. The title does not mean what that guy says. The lord of the flys is the pigs head that they put on a stick for the beast. The flys were surrounding it. That was what my teacher told us and we are one chapter away from finishing the book.
If you want to take the title's meaning even further, it's the literal translation from Beelzebub. So it goes more with what Lord of the flies was talking about.
I don't think that is the point of the paint. I think it's just supposed to represent "savagery". In the book, Ralph makes a bigger deal about the face paint and compares them to savages a lot more. Ralph represents civilization while Jack represents savagery. That's all the face paint is.
@FireFlysNeverDie Pree much, the lord of the flies, is a theoretical "devil" that lives within each human. In the book, the monster was perceived, and wasnt actual or tangible. Once Simon discovers this, he has a meeting with the "Lord of the Flies" where it is revealed to him that the monster is actually the savagery within us. And when Simon goes to tell the the oother boys, he, ahem, fails, for certain reasons :P
@morganmae2013 Not just the title, the whole symbolism of the book that explains how evil is inside of everyone. The 1963 movie didn´t show the talk between Simon and the Lord of the flies, but at least they showed the pigs head.
@MsExplosiveSocks what you mean? simon ses the real beast and was about to tell the rest and relife them from theire fear? it is in the movie, what is missing?
@Gaprielll He means when he has like a hallucination because of his epilepsy and speaks to it, about the savagery within us and that the real beast is what Jack's group is becoming. But I guess that would have been too hard to show in the movie :/
So you're saying the pig's head should talk with '90's CGI or a puppet; There is a reason why in the 1963 version the scene between Simon and the Lord of the flies was absent. That's just something my English teacher was joking about. :}
Where the part where they kill SIMON!!!
MrGuasaveno 1 week ago
Ah 240p we meet again :P
ADHDfox 3 weeks ago
we don't want your meat LOL
XD
297bunny 3 weeks ago
This doesn´t have anything to do with the book man, u r so going to fail if u do it about the movie.
Bopsman 3 weeks ago
Yep a bunch of kids sitting and playing in their underwear
Steelers630 2 months ago
2:32... ok this part is hilarious..and the twin reaction..XD
sephiaRezzar 2 months ago
Thumbs up if you watching this because you dont want to read the book fir english...
caidblades 4 months ago 15
@caidblades just so yu know its not the same
benthekid13 4 months ago
5:52 this is how the circle pit was invented.
MrSkullman858 5 months ago in playlist More videos from LordoftheFliesmovie
Where's Percival? he's my favorite character D:
TheDoremi40 5 months ago
shouldn't ralph be blonde or at least have light hair?
zczczcful 6 months ago
piggy reminds me of a young drew carrey.... 0.o
babybumbleebeex3 6 months ago 3
@babybumbleebeex3 I agree..
kagssegal 6 months ago
@babybumbleebeex3 I thought I was the only one who thought that lol
ThePlasticBowl 4 months ago in playlist More videos from LordoftheFliesmovie
Lol i love the way at 5:17 Ralph says we don't want your meat! and then he looks at Piggy who is devouring the piece of meat ! haha
CrazyInLove16xx 6 months ago
wow. this movie is a disappointment.
jane29jeng 6 months ago
Lord of the Flies shows correctly how humanity, devoid of God's moral law descends into animal behaviors..and can be nothing more...the point his book to the chagrin of his contemporary evolutionists didn't like...after all we are always evolving into better creatures....really!!
1927Norma 7 months ago
I love jacks voice o.0
sannef100 7 months ago 5
Why does the pig start with his eyes and mouth closed and then later on it's eyes are open and it's tongue is hanging out? That's sick!!
Xshinz123X 8 months ago
lord of the flies=the devil ; flies tend to flock to things that are dead and decaying . and since simon feels and sees things to others don't , he feels the devil speak to him through the pig basically telling him , that everyone is born with an innate human evil - savagery, for example - that's taking over the other's .
AliyahWasHeree 8 months ago
smmhh : SAVAGESS ! they turned n2 savagess !
BROWNGURL1213 8 months ago
What if the pigs blood had HIV and they all got aids for using it as make-up...
W1llpow3r2 9 months ago 7
Why didn't they chant.
jenny14love 9 months ago
@ FireFlysNeverDie. The title does not mean what that guy says. The lord of the flys is the pigs head that they put on a stick for the beast. The flys were surrounding it. That was what my teacher told us and we are one chapter away from finishing the book.
jenny14love 9 months ago
@jenny14love Yup the pig is the lord of the flies
hellokittypowa1992 9 months ago
@jenny14love
If you want to take the title's meaning even further, it's the literal translation from Beelzebub. So it goes more with what Lord of the flies was talking about.
Neko2Nyan 9 months ago
Where's The Chant!!!!
mspudds22 9 months ago
THE BOY WHOS SHARPING THAT STICK IS PACKING @ 0.21 SEC
crazeyashell24 9 months ago 8
@dasupasin
I don't think that is the point of the paint. I think it's just supposed to represent "savagery". In the book, Ralph makes a bigger deal about the face paint and compares them to savages a lot more. Ralph represents civilization while Jack represents savagery. That's all the face paint is.
Octoberdemons 10 months ago
THAT is supposed to be dazzle paint? You've got to be shitting me. That stands our more then their skin does, and it doesn't confuse the enemy at all
dasupasin 10 months ago
Nice bulge 0:18
Komnenit 10 months ago
Some explain the meaning of the title. I haven't read the book. Please and Thank you! <3
FireFlysNeverDie 10 months ago
@FireFlysNeverDie Pree much, the lord of the flies, is a theoretical "devil" that lives within each human. In the book, the monster was perceived, and wasnt actual or tangible. Once Simon discovers this, he has a meeting with the "Lord of the Flies" where it is revealed to him that the monster is actually the savagery within us. And when Simon goes to tell the the oother boys, he, ahem, fails, for certain reasons :P
xXMcNoobXx 10 months ago
@xXMcNoobXx Thanks to you and sparknotes, I understand this better. :)
FireFlysNeverDie 10 months ago
@FireFlysNeverDie -sigh- really?
manny24lal 9 months ago
@manny24lal JI wanted to know quick at the time. I guess they skipped an important scene. I understand it now.
FireFlysNeverDie 9 months ago
WTF!? WHY ARE THE TWINS WITH JACK?! -rages-
specklesong 10 months ago 8
Cheif- "Go on now."
Henchmen- "THE CHEIF HAS SPOKEN"
DMF330 10 months ago 7
simon has a lightsaber ?!??
elio22bbl 10 months ago 5
i dont think roger should be blonde
THRILLER1009 10 months ago 3
samneric didnt join jacks side during the feast
mutantpinyata4real 10 months ago 2
i think jack's group are girls. they're the one who are wearing make-up. savages! ><
MsP3ACE 10 months ago 4
Wait, Simon doesn't even hear/imagine the pig head as Lord of the Flies talking to him? This is bullshit; I'm not watching the rest of this.
KishonaIsa 11 months ago
lol I thought he said:
Roger the pig XD
Letasiful 11 months ago
that pig head was disgusting
flutegirl1995 11 months ago
why was that kid crawling on all fours in the first place?
shradegear 11 months ago
@shradegear he was the 'pig'
LordOfTheFlies09 11 months ago
They didn't have the scene between Simon and The Lord of the Flies?
That's one of the most important scenes!! Dx
MsExplosiveSocks 11 months ago 83
@MsExplosiveSocks yah seeing how it explains the title of the book
morganmae2013 11 months ago 45
@morganmae2013 Not just the title, the whole symbolism of the book that explains how evil is inside of everyone. The 1963 movie didn´t show the talk between Simon and the Lord of the flies, but at least they showed the pigs head.
Bopsman 3 weeks ago
@MsExplosiveSocks y wut happens?
JuanBautista12 11 months ago
@MsExplosiveSocks The scene is he sees it. Same in the older version that was more accurate to the book, he just stares at it for a few seconds.
sbseanbs 10 months ago
@MsExplosiveSocks ikr this movie is a knock off
MrxDr0pSh0tx 9 months ago
@MsExplosiveSocks what you mean? simon ses the real beast and was about to tell the rest and relife them from theire fear? it is in the movie, what is missing?
Gaprielll 9 months ago
@Gaprielll He means when he has like a hallucination because of his epilepsy and speaks to it, about the savagery within us and that the real beast is what Jack's group is becoming. But I guess that would have been too hard to show in the movie :/
ArsenalGiantsPs3 9 months ago
@MsExplosiveSocks
So you're saying the pig's head should talk with '90's CGI or a puppet; There is a reason why in the 1963 version the scene between Simon and the Lord of the flies was absent. That's just something my English teacher was joking about. :}
penguinsnowfun 3 months ago
@MsExplosiveSocks yep and the guy in the parachute
TheHornyGorrilaz 3 months ago
@MsExplosiveSocks 3:36? kinda
TheAdawg12345 3 months ago
Are those Sam and Eric in min 3:14? They are not suppose to go in their own to join Jack's Tribe
AmorettiFeather 11 months ago 2
Did Jack just invent punk rock? XD
QueenSarafina 11 months ago