It really helps your videos, thank you. However, I get really frustrated because all the instructions dont use problems that Im trying to work out in my homework. Like always and like the examples in my text, the examples are easy, and unlike the ones Im trying to solve. For example, In the denominator of the radical I have 8ab^3c^2 (^ meaning to the power of), and the numerator is 12a^3b^3c. Can you please simplify one like this?
Great video again. How about one on radicals where maybe simplification is less obvious, such as sqr rt (2) X sgr rt (28), where you can break sgr rt (28) into sgr rt (14X2), and than simply the two sgr rt (2) to just have 2. Just an idea. Sorry about my bad short hand notation.
(2) X sgr rt (28), you didn't go far enough, it would be 2 x sgr rt (4) x sgr rt (7), the sgr rt (4) would become 2 and you would have 4 x sgr rt (7),,
it was just an example...my point was for him to do an example where you have 2 radicals that do not reduce on their on, but can be reduced by breaking them individually within the radical.
It really helps your videos, thank you. However, I get really frustrated because all the instructions dont use problems that Im trying to work out in my homework. Like always and like the examples in my text, the examples are easy, and unlike the ones Im trying to solve. For example, In the denominator of the radical I have 8ab^3c^2 (^ meaning to the power of), and the numerator is 12a^3b^3c. Can you please simplify one like this?
kacertj 1 month ago
Rebecca Black disliked this video because she failed this part on her test.
1989Firecracker 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have iphone or ipad and you want to calculate integrals check this app:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
bebefore3 3 months ago in playlist Βίντεο από MathTV
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have iphone or ipad and you want to calculate integrals check this app:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
bebefore3 3 months ago in playlist Βίντεο από MathTV
Try a 4th part including a radical denominator.
Fun fun fun!
42KaKa 1 year ago
so much better, straight forward like a man should. the teacher i had like to play little girly games instead of teaching.
ezcondition 2 years ago
no worries we wont weaken
BozGoalie 2 years ago
You're making things a lot easier by every video. Thank you.
WrestlenAnimal797 2 years ago 6
Great video again. How about one on radicals where maybe simplification is less obvious, such as sqr rt (2) X sgr rt (28), where you can break sgr rt (28) into sgr rt (14X2), and than simply the two sgr rt (2) to just have 2. Just an idea. Sorry about my bad short hand notation.
friendlyfire53 2 years ago 3
(2) X sgr rt (28), you didn't go far enough, it would be 2 x sgr rt (4) x sgr rt (7), the sgr rt (4) would become 2 and you would have 4 x sgr rt (7),,
greywolf424 2 years ago
it was just an example...my point was for him to do an example where you have 2 radicals that do not reduce on their on, but can be reduced by breaking them individually within the radical.
friendlyfire53 2 years ago
If you notice, that's what I did when I split 28 into 4 and 7..... he does it as well.
greywolf424 2 years ago