If you see my video "Future Dreams" just near the end you would see the table of bosons, aranged in a similar fashion to that of elements in periodic table, A photon is smaller than electron, it would be impossible for a particle to magically loose size and mass to be come photon, but would be more logical for it to be still travelling, but releasing a photon from itself. Photons together form the larger heavier bosons.
@zanaelf Hi again my friend. Schrodinger, in 1923, had already suggested that 'particles' were some form of standing waves. However, whilst it was accepted that this appeared to have some veracity, there were found to be problems with the fact that the speed of light is not a constant for all electromagnetic wavelengths and also, if I remember correctly, values many times greater than expected needed to be accommodated in the formulae. contd.
@MrFrancisH I agree with the point they are not constant , not because of the wave behaviour alone. , but there size. Different sizes creates different wavelengths which create different colours.
@zanaelf Cont'd. In my uploads I intended to clarify that, since matter can only be Energy, and that Energy possibly electromagnetic, then 'Mass' is nothing other than how particles behave in relation to adjacent Matter and to the Universe in general. Gravity being simply the refraction of the Matter Wave. i.e. A Spacetime
distortion or warp as per Einstein.
Wave Mechanics has gone a little way down this path but has 'chickened-out' taking the theory to a logical conclusion.
@MrFrancisH hmm,I do apologise I disagree on that as it would not make Infinity like a fractal Infinite but finite which means at the end of the universe is nothing, and from the smallest known particle which you accept as a particle nothing, if this is the case, the universe would collapse on itself and cancel out forever into absolute nothing with no existence of energy as well. The"mass" isnt nothing,it appears as nothing because it is too tiny for earth humanity physically measure,mass not 0
@zanaelf Please allow for my excentricities. My uploads 1 to 6 (I think) lay down my interpretation of Gravity with a nodding aqaintance to what constitutes Matter. I continually stress that I dislike the term Particle. Since Dirac predicted that an high energy photon can convert to both an Electron and a Positron (anti-matter), and this was proved photographically in a Wilson Cloud Chamber, I have held that all matter is only energy. Whether this energy can continue forever I don't know.
"Part 3 6 Platonic Solids, Photons, God Particle, Infinity, There is no God" video in my channel gives a basic theorectical model,I feel I need to do a video to elaborate more such as the information I have on my facebook, liveournal. I would do this some time later, wheh I have some time :-)
@zanaelf Hi, my friend. Will look at your video mentioned, re. God.
I think that the interpretation of exactly what, or whom, God is, causes most of the disagreements between the different Faiths and also between those who have a Religious belief and Atheists.
Any human capacity to understand relies either on our experience of the World directly, or, say, from shared Scientific knowledge.
I am a Christian and my point of contact tends to be the humanity of Christ. No man understands all.
Hi zanelf, thanks for your comment. Since posting this video I have tried to visualize the electron when it exists in both its bound and free states. The thought has occurred to me that if the electron 'evolved' from the splitting of a photon into one of two circularly polarised waves, as potentially suggested by Dirac's theories, then in the bound state around the Nucleus it might exist as circularly polarised or standing Helical wave. Not an answer, but rope like, as you visualise the photon?
@MrFrancisH Thank you very much for the responce :-) I do apologise but I model the photon to be that it creates the electrons and other charged universe particles and is the source . Yes I picture the behaviour of the photon to act as a rope through space-time :-)
@zanaelf Hi again. If I had the facilities which the recognised Scientists have, I would place all my efforts into the analysis of the Electromagnetic, and whatever, 'Wave Functions' which may explain how 'matter', i.e. Energy, reacts with other matter. On top of my 'refraction of the matter wave' to explain Gravity, we have Electrostatic and Magnetic attraction and repulsion. A wave can carry an enormous amount of information content. e.g. Frequency, plane or polarised, amplitude etc., etc.
@MrFrancisH Thank you very much, the problem is that people look at the wave and not its composition, nothing cannot create something , it is only transferred and transformed, like the law of conservation of energy. Energy is vibration and the behaviour. If photon is energy. If photon existed as energy only, it would not be pulled or its path of travel effected by gravity, and travel in strait line, but it is thus it has substance as it is attracted by gravity, as well has its own gravitational
The photon is quantum universe containing smaller particles that move in vortex torus structure., its spin is not like it is known, but flows in vortex , like that of the gravitation fields of galaxies, stars and planets. The energy If you look at E=mc2 one cannot remove the (m) part and say that it exists as nothing but flowing energy. Photons themselves have a mass and can be formulated in equation.
@the reason why i say photons are source particles of all particles in this brane of this quantum universe using electrons is on how a lightbulb works. Electrons release photons when excited/photosythesis is the opposite reaction of this.
The original theory for splitting was, I believe, anticipated By Dirac in 1928. This was experimentally photographed by Anderson in 1932. Clearly seen on one photograph are the curved paths of the Electron and the Positron (antimatter). The paths originate from a sheet of lead where the 'impact' of the photon with an Atom Nucleus occur and curve in opposite directions due to a magnetic field applied across a Wilson Cloud Chamber. The 10 minute upload on Utube limits info. content.
ifa high energy hit the magnetic wave and a antimatter comes out shouldnt that cause an explosion as big as 10 nuclear bombs because the antimatter will hit matter?
Hi, Deltaforce. I cannot remember replying to this, apologies. I sometimes email. Please see my latest reply to wijecat otherwise I would need to duplicate parts of my answer to you. Now, when the photon splits its energy is taken to be at least 1.02 Mev in order to produce two particles of 0.51 Mev. The production is due to close 'contact' or proximity to the Nucleus of an Atom. The positron life is very short due to the abundance of free natural electrons. Re-bonding is of the same nom. Energy
Yes, but I'm not trying to explain phase convertors and to add any more to the cicuit diagram shown would have complicated it for non electrical people.
I should have made it more clear as regards the three Vectors rotating to project three sine waves but this answer may help a little.
If you see my video "Future Dreams" just near the end you would see the table of bosons, aranged in a similar fashion to that of elements in periodic table, A photon is smaller than electron, it would be impossible for a particle to magically loose size and mass to be come photon, but would be more logical for it to be still travelling, but releasing a photon from itself. Photons together form the larger heavier bosons.
zanaelf 1 year ago
@zanaelf Hi again my friend. Schrodinger, in 1923, had already suggested that 'particles' were some form of standing waves. However, whilst it was accepted that this appeared to have some veracity, there were found to be problems with the fact that the speed of light is not a constant for all electromagnetic wavelengths and also, if I remember correctly, values many times greater than expected needed to be accommodated in the formulae. contd.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@MrFrancisH I agree with the point they are not constant , not because of the wave behaviour alone. , but there size. Different sizes creates different wavelengths which create different colours.
zanaelf 1 year ago
@zanaelf Cont'd. In my uploads I intended to clarify that, since matter can only be Energy, and that Energy possibly electromagnetic, then 'Mass' is nothing other than how particles behave in relation to adjacent Matter and to the Universe in general. Gravity being simply the refraction of the Matter Wave. i.e. A Spacetime
distortion or warp as per Einstein.
Wave Mechanics has gone a little way down this path but has 'chickened-out' taking the theory to a logical conclusion.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@MrFrancisH hmm,I do apologise I disagree on that as it would not make Infinity like a fractal Infinite but finite which means at the end of the universe is nothing, and from the smallest known particle which you accept as a particle nothing, if this is the case, the universe would collapse on itself and cancel out forever into absolute nothing with no existence of energy as well. The"mass" isnt nothing,it appears as nothing because it is too tiny for earth humanity physically measure,mass not 0
zanaelf 1 year ago
@zanaelf Please allow for my excentricities. My uploads 1 to 6 (I think) lay down my interpretation of Gravity with a nodding aqaintance to what constitutes Matter. I continually stress that I dislike the term Particle. Since Dirac predicted that an high energy photon can convert to both an Electron and a Positron (anti-matter), and this was proved photographically in a Wilson Cloud Chamber, I have held that all matter is only energy. Whether this energy can continue forever I don't know.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
"Part 3 6 Platonic Solids, Photons, God Particle, Infinity, There is no God" video in my channel gives a basic theorectical model,I feel I need to do a video to elaborate more such as the information I have on my facebook, liveournal. I would do this some time later, wheh I have some time :-)
zanaelf 1 year ago
@zanaelf Hi, my friend. Will look at your video mentioned, re. God.
I think that the interpretation of exactly what, or whom, God is, causes most of the disagreements between the different Faiths and also between those who have a Religious belief and Atheists.
Any human capacity to understand relies either on our experience of the World directly, or, say, from shared Scientific knowledge.
I am a Christian and my point of contact tends to be the humanity of Christ. No man understands all.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@MrFrancisH Hello Thank you very much for the reply, yup many apologies if I offended you, as I never meant to , and I am not man ((^_^))
zanaelf 1 year ago
@zanaelf No offence taken at all. I thought it wiser to explain my background such that my 'take' on reality could be understood.
Best regards, Frank.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
Hi zanelf, thanks for your comment. Since posting this video I have tried to visualize the electron when it exists in both its bound and free states. The thought has occurred to me that if the electron 'evolved' from the splitting of a photon into one of two circularly polarised waves, as potentially suggested by Dirac's theories, then in the bound state around the Nucleus it might exist as circularly polarised or standing Helical wave. Not an answer, but rope like, as you visualise the photon?
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@MrFrancisH Thank you very much for the responce :-) I do apologise but I model the photon to be that it creates the electrons and other charged universe particles and is the source . Yes I picture the behaviour of the photon to act as a rope through space-time :-)
zanaelf 1 year ago
@zanaelf Hi again. If I had the facilities which the recognised Scientists have, I would place all my efforts into the analysis of the Electromagnetic, and whatever, 'Wave Functions' which may explain how 'matter', i.e. Energy, reacts with other matter. On top of my 'refraction of the matter wave' to explain Gravity, we have Electrostatic and Magnetic attraction and repulsion. A wave can carry an enormous amount of information content. e.g. Frequency, plane or polarised, amplitude etc., etc.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@MrFrancisH Thank you very much, the problem is that people look at the wave and not its composition, nothing cannot create something , it is only transferred and transformed, like the law of conservation of energy. Energy is vibration and the behaviour. If photon is energy. If photon existed as energy only, it would not be pulled or its path of travel effected by gravity, and travel in strait line, but it is thus it has substance as it is attracted by gravity, as well has its own gravitational
zanaelf 1 year ago
The photon is quantum universe containing smaller particles that move in vortex torus structure., its spin is not like it is known, but flows in vortex , like that of the gravitation fields of galaxies, stars and planets. The energy If you look at E=mc2 one cannot remove the (m) part and say that it exists as nothing but flowing energy. Photons themselves have a mass and can be formulated in equation.
zanaelf 1 year ago
@the reason why i say photons are source particles of all particles in this brane of this quantum universe using electrons is on how a lightbulb works. Electrons release photons when excited/photosythesis is the opposite reaction of this.
zanaelf 1 year ago
hmm ((^_^)) interesting, photons are quantum universes, and are more rope-like than wave like due to there quantum nature in quantum entanglement.
zanaelf 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 Similarly to above, may we discuss this shortly.
Regards, Frank.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
@KOlive2043 Thanks, a fair comment but perhaps we could discuss this further.
I feel that the results of some experiments point to a totally simple electron.
Will contact you after looking at your other comments.
Very best regards. Frank.
MrFrancisH 1 year ago
The original theory for splitting was, I believe, anticipated By Dirac in 1928. This was experimentally photographed by Anderson in 1932. Clearly seen on one photograph are the curved paths of the Electron and the Positron (antimatter). The paths originate from a sheet of lead where the 'impact' of the photon with an Atom Nucleus occur and curve in opposite directions due to a magnetic field applied across a Wilson Cloud Chamber. The 10 minute upload on Utube limits info. content.
MrFrancisH 2 years ago
ifa high energy hit the magnetic wave and a antimatter comes out shouldnt that cause an explosion as big as 10 nuclear bombs because the antimatter will hit matter?
deltaforce 2 years ago
Hi, Deltaforce. I cannot remember replying to this, apologies. I sometimes email. Please see my latest reply to wijecat otherwise I would need to duplicate parts of my answer to you. Now, when the photon splits its energy is taken to be at least 1.02 Mev in order to produce two particles of 0.51 Mev. The production is due to close 'contact' or proximity to the Nucleus of an Atom. The positron life is very short due to the abundance of free natural electrons. Re-bonding is of the same nom. Energy
MrFrancisH 2 years ago
Yes, but I'm not trying to explain phase convertors and to add any more to the cicuit diagram shown would have complicated it for non electrical people.
I should have made it more clear as regards the three Vectors rotating to project three sine waves but this answer may help a little.
Thanks for the comment.
MrFrancisH 2 years ago