Would be a huge win to include this feature in the main product line of SAP BPM, but it seems it got silent around this project.
However...Research Project?
Solutions like this already exist, e.g. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM could push events for any process activiy at runtime for processing in their CEP engine.
@fitzecarraldo76: Actually some of the functionality is going to be included in a NW Feature Pack. It'll look different but it's as good as it gets for the moment.
This is unbelievable. Last week i got this link ipad2reward (dot) info from my friend. Normally i don't believe any of this shit. Just participate in some kind of iPad2 Test program and get iPad2 for free. The word "Free" doesn't really exist in this world. The day after i tried give my email their and joined the program. And you know what! A Brand New iPad2 is in my hand now. I can't really believe this. And you don't have to believe me. But 3 friends of mine even got that thing before me.
At the moment, it is mainly technology. NW BPM does not (yet) enable event sending out of the box. Also, we have not tested our implementation for performance. In terms of skills, the person to define the CEP models still needs to be fairly technical at this point. Process definition stays as is, no problems here. And budget, well budget is always a problem in the end, I guess. I would raise maintenance as an issue also, as the monitoring model is independent of the process model and may break.
This is really good. This is how business should run. What are the main obstacles for implementing this technology? Budget constraints, Processes definition constraints, Technology constraints, Skills constraints?
Would be a huge win to include this feature in the main product line of SAP BPM, but it seems it got silent around this project.
However...Research Project?
Solutions like this already exist, e.g. TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM could push events for any process activiy at runtime for processing in their CEP engine.
fitzecarraldo76 4 months ago
@fitzecarraldo76: Actually some of the functionality is going to be included in a NW Feature Pack. It'll look different but it's as good as it gets for the moment.
FamerlorDragon 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is unbelievable. Last week i got this link ipad2reward (dot) info from my friend. Normally i don't believe any of this shit. Just participate in some kind of iPad2 Test program and get iPad2 for free. The word "Free" doesn't really exist in this world. The day after i tried give my email their and joined the program. And you know what! A Brand New iPad2 is in my hand now. I can't really believe this. And you don't have to believe me. But 3 friends of mine even got that thing before me.
finickyweapon241258 10 months ago
At the moment, it is mainly technology. NW BPM does not (yet) enable event sending out of the box. Also, we have not tested our implementation for performance. In terms of skills, the person to define the CEP models still needs to be fairly technical at this point. Process definition stays as is, no problems here. And budget, well budget is always a problem in the end, I guess. I would raise maintenance as an issue also, as the monitoring model is independent of the process model and may break.
christianjaniesch 1 year ago
This is really good. This is how business should run. What are the main obstacles for implementing this technology? Budget constraints, Processes definition constraints, Technology constraints, Skills constraints?
cweffer 1 year ago