Is it not part of individual freedoms which you seam to value so much the individual freedom of women to be independent, have a career and participate in society on equal footing with men if she so chooses? Or are you only here talking about men's personal freedoms?
I'm barely more than half a minute into your "lecture," and I can already spot your logical fallacies. At around 0:43, you claim patriarchy is "the natural order and actual structure of the universe." You must not have much knowledge of biology, because there are tons of species where the females are dominant or much stronger than the male.
How about this: Everyone is an individual with their own potential, and whoever uses that potential deserves to be successful, regardless of gender?
There are no individuals. All of life conists of the Yin and Yang, the seen and the unseen, the feminine and the masculine.
How about this. We are here to propagate and preserve the species while on our spiritual journey. Indivisuals do not propagate and nurture the species, only males and females do.
P.S. There aren't tons of species where females are dominent. Watch a few more of the videos--there's a concept involved.
@mensaction If that's what you believe, then there's no point debating with you. If you think everything all boils down to that and that people are only defined by such binary terms as "male" and "female," then perhaps you should open your mind. I believe there is a natural balance of life (the ecology), but it's up to us to reach our full potential instead of letting it dictate us.
Yes there are. Ants, hyenas, anglerfish, bees, many spiders, praying mantises and meerkats to name a few.
@NintendoArielle Thanks for your comments. Since you seem to be well steeped in biology then you know that design denotes function. Those with wombs have a different function than those with testes.
You are using the Western material and feminine approach to knowledge by looking at the external world. Truth is found in the inner world. It is the unseen that controls the seen in all things.
@mensaction Yes, wombs and testicles are different, but those are merely our physical parts. Why should our purpose be measured solely by if we have a womb or testicles?
Once again, my point is that we are not defined only by our genders. While I agree that there is a "yin and yang" of sorts, it's really a metaphor for balance, such as what we find in ecology. Aside from being scientifically-minded, I'm also a philosophical person, so I don't let my physical ("material") aspects define me.
@mensaction If that were the case, we wouldn't see women who don't want to have babies, or men who like to crossdress. Things aren't as black and white as you make them out to be.
@mensaction There is no "deviation" from "truth," because there is no one "truth." Your "truth" is different from my "truth," and a random person we grab off the street will also have a different "truth." Why are you so narcissistic as to believe that your "truth" is the only one that's true?
@mensaction So then you admit there is no whole truth. Thus, you're admitting that what you say isn't the "truth." And doesn't my "truth" contradict yours?
There is no set truth in our beliefs and morals. You may believe what you want, but that doesn't mean it's everyone's truth. I haven't watched all your videos, but from what I can tell, you assert that it's "unnatural" to live in a way that opposes your particular viewpoint. That is, once again, narcissistic.
Is it not part of individual freedoms which you seam to value so much the individual freedom of women to be independent, have a career and participate in society on equal footing with men if she so chooses? Or are you only here talking about men's personal freedoms?
Venefica82 1 year ago
I'm barely more than half a minute into your "lecture," and I can already spot your logical fallacies. At around 0:43, you claim patriarchy is "the natural order and actual structure of the universe." You must not have much knowledge of biology, because there are tons of species where the females are dominant or much stronger than the male.
How about this: Everyone is an individual with their own potential, and whoever uses that potential deserves to be successful, regardless of gender?
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle
There are no individuals. All of life conists of the Yin and Yang, the seen and the unseen, the feminine and the masculine.
How about this. We are here to propagate and preserve the species while on our spiritual journey. Indivisuals do not propagate and nurture the species, only males and females do.
P.S. There aren't tons of species where females are dominent. Watch a few more of the videos--there's a concept involved.
mensaction 1 year ago
@mensaction If that's what you believe, then there's no point debating with you. If you think everything all boils down to that and that people are only defined by such binary terms as "male" and "female," then perhaps you should open your mind. I believe there is a natural balance of life (the ecology), but it's up to us to reach our full potential instead of letting it dictate us.
Yes there are. Ants, hyenas, anglerfish, bees, many spiders, praying mantises and meerkats to name a few.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle Thanks for your comments. Since you seem to be well steeped in biology then you know that design denotes function. Those with wombs have a different function than those with testes.
You are using the Western material and feminine approach to knowledge by looking at the external world. Truth is found in the inner world. It is the unseen that controls the seen in all things.
I will leave you with that thought at this time.
Be well.
E.G.
mensaction 1 year ago
@mensaction Yes, wombs and testicles are different, but those are merely our physical parts. Why should our purpose be measured solely by if we have a womb or testicles?
Once again, my point is that we are not defined only by our genders. While I agree that there is a "yin and yang" of sorts, it's really a metaphor for balance, such as what we find in ecology. Aside from being scientifically-minded, I'm also a philosophical person, so I don't let my physical ("material") aspects define me.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle
We are notthe function of our gender; our gender is the function of who we are.
E.G.
mensaction 1 year ago
@mensaction If that were the case, we wouldn't see women who don't want to have babies, or men who like to crossdress. Things aren't as black and white as you make them out to be.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle Truth is black and white. Deviations from truth comes in shades of gray.
mensaction 1 year ago
@mensaction There is no "deviation" from "truth," because there is no one "truth." Your "truth" is different from my "truth," and a random person we grab off the street will also have a different "truth." Why are you so narcissistic as to believe that your "truth" is the only one that's true?
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle Every one has a piece of the truth; no one has the whole truth. Nevertheless, there is truth.
mensaction 1 year ago
@mensaction So then you admit there is no whole truth. Thus, you're admitting that what you say isn't the "truth." And doesn't my "truth" contradict yours?
There is no set truth in our beliefs and morals. You may believe what you want, but that doesn't mean it's everyone's truth. I haven't watched all your videos, but from what I can tell, you assert that it's "unnatural" to live in a way that opposes your particular viewpoint. That is, once again, narcissistic.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
Hope to see more video from you Elder George. I've visit your website, read your articles, watch some of your video and I've have learn a lot.
Keep up the good work sir.
UMP45 3 years ago