ZAPRUDER FAKERY 2 - John Costella Part 12

[jasrogg]

Hear those old men argue.They are bickering about an event that happened 50 years ago.Someday and ill bet its sooner than later There will be Kennedy Assassination reenactments.And with virtual reality getting better.You will be able to actually see where the bullets come from.Make no mistake this is a hobby for older middle class white men.Its like sailing toy boats.We have now shown truly how inept we are.We dont even stand up for a murder victim.The POWERS that be are 2 big and r 2 far ahead!

[marycatherinedarden]

taking occams razor into account, it makes more logical simple sense for the government to want jfk dead than for a single man to carry out the act without previous detection. occams razor is frequently only half understood and it is proven false in frequent circumstances...the simplest explanation is not always the real truth and who has ever measured the difference in complexity between the explanation of why a man would assassinate jfk vs the explanation of the shadow government doing it?

[paraconti]

The truth is always simple. This is making the truth waaay too complicated. The Warren Commission's report and Dale Myers' work is clearly the most simple explanation and easily understood by even laymen.

[reefergladness]

i wish the fucker(s) in the audience would shut the fuck up and let john talk

[LordBalto]

@reefergladness That's David Lifton, who's done more to expose the truth than you ever will.

[reefergladness]

@LordBalto i don't care if it's the ghost of jim garrison - he's still rude.. 

[LordBalto]

@reefergladness Yes, Lifton is annoying, but you have to realize this is a symposium, not a broad public event. There are something like 20 people in the room.

[proudfootz]

Having difficulty following interaction with audience as the speakers are not using microphones.

[trey1833]

It's because conspiracy people are having to change tactics because modern forensics are interpreting the film as evidence of one shooter...so now the Zapruter film must be a fake.

[kruns11]

@trey1833 well it is though. i mean look at it.

[n0gar]

I believe in conspiracy, but I do find it strange that when something cannot be fully disputed, they change tactics. HOWEVER, when it is led or comes from Fetzer, I don't believe a word out of his mouth. If anything, he is probably sent to throw a wrench in the whole thing. I read a book of his and he asks a lot of questions and suggest a lot of things, but he does not answer many questions. The CIA always get info from work on the INSIDE, so I think Fetzer is getting info. He's a fool.

[LordBalto]

@trey1833 That is just plain not true. Modern forensics are interpreting the film as, at the very least, modified to a large extent, and at worst, a complete fraud. The darkening of the back of the head is so obvious, when I first saw it I thought it was dirt floating around in the camera. .

[DoubleR666]

why would they change the sign in the first place ? IF the sign was altered in the Z-film, why ? to hide what ?

[n0gar]

The only thing it could are bullets.

[huskyjerk]

@DoubleR666 The timing of the first shot(s), and perhaps the origin of the first shot. What if, as some have suggested, the first shot penetrated the windshield? Without a sign there to block our view, we'd then see debri fly off the windshield, hence, killing the one shooter from the rear theory.

[GratedTopping]

@DoubleR666 From what I heard suggested in some video from somewhere, the sign had a bullet hole in it --- however they were pointing it out in the Zapruder film, so some would say they had an earlier, unaltered Zapruder film.