Added: 4 years ago
From: Klarkster
Views: 109,030
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (5,626)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol ok

  • The Creation Museum.... hard evidence of how religious delusion retards the development of mankind.

  • Makes me think sometimes genocide is a viable option.

  • What a load of rubbish

  • Makes me ashamed to be American

  • ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)

  • @Mogley52 You, sir, are a moron.

  • NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.

  • IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

  • DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.

  • NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM

  • @Mogley52 You do not have a clue about the process of evolution through natural selection. You are truly making a fool of yourself with this string of comments.

  • THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation. Also read my Internet article, ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH! According to a Newsweek article quoting a NASA scientist, in the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (now meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil.

  • Oh my God.

    How fucking stupid do you have to be to belive in creationism...

    Seriously the Genesis is just a story. It doesn't answer how the world was created, it just points out that God was at the beggining of all. And why not since causation denies the self provoked event. But to belive that God just went"bam-horse, bam-human"and said"Eyyy" like Fonzie is just silly. Creationists You don't help, moreover you only make your religion and its followers(including me)look like idiots!Stop!

  • There's a lot less facts in evolution? Seriously!!!!!!!!

    We only have 1 life so please don't waste it believing in some nob in the sky.

  • @ColdShaunUK  As a scientist i thought i am going to hit something when i heard her saying this! The ignorance is just unbelievable!

  • @waketheoblivious <---- window licking spasticated inbred fuckwitt.

  • Pardon me?!

    "Many of them [Dinosaurs] were quite peaceful. Docile."

    Unless you've just stepped out of your Time Machine to relay that nugget of information, sir, please shut the fuck up.

  • I do this for everyone with an IQ over 60: *FACEPALM*

  • Fucking hell - is this an April Fool's day prank? No one could be gullible enough to believe any of this nonsense

  • I thought I read somewhere where this museum is or will be getting some public funding through taxes. Isn't this technically a religous museum, and churches don't get public funding, at least that I'm aware of. I also think I read somewhere that someone who visited the museum, an atheist, said that there were not many dates given in the building. Is this right? Has anyone actually visited the museum? If one was to go into a 'real' science and history museum, dates are found all over the place.

  • @musicholickgp And I realize that some things are sometimes hard to date; specific dates may be hard to get sometimes, and especially perhaps the farther back something goes, but getting an idea for how old or long ago something occured is something that both scientists and historians try to figure out. I was skimming through a Lutheran textbook saying how dinosaurs lived a long time ago, but it never said how long ago they lived or how long they lived for.

  • This made me want to cry

  • YABBADABAH DOOOH!

  • Do they show Fred Flinstones, Barney Rubles and their wives Wilma and Betty in the museum? What about Dino??? HA HA HA HA! RIDICULOUS!

  • 1:40

    And that is Digimon in a nutshell.

  • What has this world come too....

  • Wow... does Kentucky really need any further dumbing down?

  • I'm ashamed to live within a 30 minute drive of this place.

  • @capitanzach burn it to the ground. for man!

  • @inconsp1cuous1515 Your hatred isn't any better than the Christian's hatred.

  • @Blomsterbob2K Those are our tax dollars at work. The museum is ran by Answers in Genesis -- a tax exempt organization. So the American tax payer is funding miseducation on a grand scale. So I'll hate and wanna burn that shit to the ground all I fucking want.

  • @inconsp1cuous1515 Why would you burn it down? Whenever he is having a bad day he can drive there, have a good laugh and feel better about himself.

  • @capitanzach YesI can understand you feelin ashamed, while USA is on the forefront on many technologies imagine what it would be like if religion wasn't hobbling young minds so much?,,

    HUBBLE replacement would be out past the solar system and man maybe living on mars, all sorts of tech would be withing reach.

  • Petersburg, Kentucky BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Idiocracy abounds.

  • Creation Science.... one of the great oxymorons of our age.

  • So where's your facts that God physically exists? Sorry but that isn't a fact. That's a belief. Nothing what you're saying is true. In FACT you're nothing more than an individual who suffers from extreme delusions. You need to get psychological help before you end up killing someone.

  • @TheAntiV <------------- suffers mindfucked insanity 

  • @waketheoblivious

    Ad-hominem.

  • Science prides itself in facts. God's warnings are not a threat, they are fact. History has demonstrated God's warnings to be fact, repeatedly. Two types of people, those who know, what I AM saying is True and those who no, what I AM saying is True.

  • @waketheoblivious Your alleged "god" is nothing but a man made myth. Get over yourself.

  • @waketheoblivious

    Piltdown man was exposed by scientists. The fact that it took forty years is certainly no shining example of science in action, but it does show that science corrects errors.

    The tooth was never held in high regard by scientists. Osborn, who described it, was unsure whether it came from a hominid or from another kind of ape, and others were skeptical that it even belonged to a primate.

  • @waketheoblivious

    Sorry but there is no evidence that Lucy was manipulated using plaster.

    There's also no evidence that Peking man were no mingled fossils.

    Concerning Ocre man, there is not enough of the fossil to make its identity clear. It is still uncertain whether the fragment is hominid or equine. It is a misrepresentation to call it misidentified when there was never a consensus on its identification in the first place.

  • A French Jesuit Priest manufactured the Piltdown Man Hoax (1913-53) used to by pass schoolboard objection to teaching science fiction as fact. That same Jesuit Priest then sustained the Illusion with the diabolical Peking Man as another fraudulent "missing link" to sustain the Evil Illusion. Evolution has never legitimately met the scientific standard of "irrefutable evidence". In short, evolution is for idiots, morons and insane Atheists/Satanists.

  • @waketheoblivious

    Preconceptions are an unavoidable problem in just about any investigation, but they are less so in science because first, different scientists often have different preconceptions, and second, the physical evidence must always be accounted for. Many scientists from America and Europe did not accept Piltdown Man uncritically, and the hoax unraveled when the fossils could not be reconciled with other hominid fossil finds.

  • @waketheoblivious

    One hoax cannot indicate the inferiority of conventional archeology, because creationists have several of their own, including Paluxy footprints, the Calaveras skull, Moab and Malachite Man, and others. More telling is how people deal with these hoaxes. When Piltdown was exposed, it stopped being used as evidence. The creationist hoaxes, however, can still be found cited as if they were real. Piltdown has been over and done with for decades.

  • @waketheoblivious

    Sorry but the only thing you've revealed is that creationism has never met any scientific standard whatsoever. Unlike evolution, creationists don't follow the scientific method and make conclusions before collecting facts. Evolutionist scientists collect facts first before making conclusions.

  • @waketheoblivious

    Where's your evidence that he meant the Judeo-Christian God when he said "invisible hand?" Adam Smith was an economist and a philosopher. How the hell do you scientifically prove an economic theory scientifically true? What you just said makes no sense.

  • @TheAntiV <---------- Fucking ignoramus

  • @waketheoblivious

    Ad-hominems won't help you.

  • @TheAntiV

    Science proved the existence of God over 250+ years ago you complete and total fucking ignoramus.

  • @waketheoblivious

    We're not proving the existence of God. We're discussing creationism. Try to stay on track.

  • @TheAntiV

    The degree of ignorance which you have publicly displayed, falls in the category of mindfucked insanity. You are a perfect example of what happens when someone has their fundamental commitment to the truth wired to a light switch of convenience.

  • @waketheoblivious

    Yeah because believing that the Earth is 6000 years old and that we are all the inbred descendants from just two people is the epitome of a mind that is clearly sane right?

  • Hmm, though i do have to admit, one thing that makes me jealous of americans is their houses

  • there's a lot less facts on evolution than in religion?? did i just step into the twilight zone?

  • HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, oh wait..... they are serious ;(

  • This is why nobody respects America. Creationists need to get out of the Dark Ages and catch up with the rest of us who are in the 21st century.

  • Also the BBC report was a set up, with the only scientist interviewed being an evolutionary Biologist. So once again the public only get to hear one side of the story. If there is only one horse in a race it comes home a certain winner.

  • The BBC report is totally wrong as always. The Bible being true does not mean that Biology, Physics etc have got it wrong for hundreds of years. That statement is absurd. It does mean that objective scientific research has been compromised since darwin's day due to the twisitng of science to accomodate the ludicrous evolutionary theory.

  • @jeepsterrr - How exactly is evolution ludicrous?

    £10 says you have no idea what evolution states.

  • @Leonis1989 Well I will happily supply my address for you to send the money to. I have a degree in Biology and a Dip Ed. I teach in an international school and have been teaching for 27 years. There is no mechanism for a single cell to become to anything other than a single cell. That is still the case 152 years after the publication of the origin of species. "Evolution" is a slippery word. Genetic mutations do occur. Natural selection occurs but it does not make anything more comple

  • @jeepsterrr - I hardly believe you have a degree....in anything.

    But nonetheless, would you care to tell me what defines a genomes 'complexity'? Is it the increase of base pairs? The variation of sequencing or alterations to morphological structures? Because we have examples of all 3.

    And please, try to avoid creationist buzz words like 'information', 'complex', 'kind' or 'type' or any others without defining them.

  • @jeepsterrr "There is no mechanism for a single cell to become to anything other than a single cell." => yes we do, only you deny them cuz you refuse to believe they exist unless you see them with your own eyes. You are demanding to see something that takes at least in the scale of thousands of years, and demand to see it within a human lifespan. That's wrong.

  • @jeepsterrr You are a deeply ignorant person. That you are a teacher is a disgrace to civilisation.

    You talk as though multicellular life is a sudden event, and with a biology degree you must know that isn't the case.

    Mechanism? Try ‘Evolution of Biological Information’, Thomas Schneider, Journal of Nuclaic Acid Research, Oxford University, July 2000.

    It's open access, there is no excuse for ignorance.

  • @gamesbok I refrained from replying until I dug up a copy of the paper in question. Firstly, Schneider has tried to propose mechanisms by which certain things may have happened. That is totally different from having any hard evidence that it did happen that way. Stephen Meyer in his work "signature in the cell" points out numerous problems with Scheider's work. As for multicellular life appearing suddenly. It did. It is called the Cambrian Explosion.

  • @jeepsterrr As for the gap between unicellular and multicellular organisms the (really) short answer is: choanoflagellates (colony forming single celled organisms that are strikingly similar to cells found in sponges called choanocytes).

    We have multi-cells from 600m years ago, and if Gagon and Mitchigan work out, 2.1Bn years.

    Myers isn’t published, Schneider is. Myers is still chasing his ‘specified complexity’, a concept he cannot define and certainly cannot measure.

  • @gamesbok This is just typical of the baseless assumptions evolutionists make. It is totally unscientific to assume that Choanocytes have evolved from Choanoflagettes just because of similarity. Similarity only suggests evolution in the mind of someone who wants to believe in evolution.

  • @jeepsterrr I didn't say that Choanocytes did evolve from Choanoflagettes Evolution is a proven face, so it's not an assumption.

    The point is that multicellular organisms existed long before the Cambrian, and you're wrong once again.

    The most glaring problem with Meyer's hypothesis is that it lacks a mechanism, a problem that evolution does not face.

  • @jeepsterrr "Similarity only suggests evolution if one wants to believe in evolution." => Micro-evolution is a fact, and macro-evolution is simply micro-evolution repeated over a much longer time scale. U are basically demanding to see a macro-evolution within a human lifespan and evolution theory itself states that's impossible. Analogy is imagine I claim trees cannot grow from seeds to over 20 meters long and I demand u to prove me wrong, yet I only accept what i can see directly.

  • and then you people wonder why the rest of the world thinks you're stupid

  • THIS MUSEM IS AN AFFRONT TO STUPIDITY

  • Did you notice there was no fact debate in this video? Just a lot of "he said" "she said". Give me scientific fact to support both sides. Instead of propaganda.

  • This gives an idea of the size of the warchest that the evangelical leaders have, and how much they are willing to spend in order to brainswash the docile sheep to keep them donating. I feel sorry not only for the undereducated and ignorant who are conned by this bullshit in the name of religion, but also because this puts a black mark on the intelligence level in the United States to all foreigners.

  • These folks should be tried for deliberately spreading this stupid ideas - i wonder when we will deny the holocaust for fear of offending somebody... fucking superstitious lying bastards! this is a crime against humanity and should be treated as such.

  • Creationists. In case you didn't pick up on it. That was a video of a nice Englishman trying his damnedest not to laugh at you.

  • @xdassinx

    Yes the freedom to laugh at those who exercise their freedom still exists in this country.

    You may have missed that central reality: freedom.

  • @sojoyful Exercise their freedom? You have a right to an opinion, you do NOT have a right to your own fact.

    Facts are facts and that Ken Hamm is a liar and a cheat guilty of fraud is a fact.

    Kenny boy is old enough to remember the bad old days of creationism when the Godly didn't even believe in dinosaurs. And voiced this rather loudly.

    Once it became obvious even to creationists that dinos were real they have tried to lay ownership to them in Christian propaganda.

    Lying for Jesus!

  • All you creationist types can relax now. Evolution has now been proven as scientific fact rather than just a theory. So you can now get on with your lives and put this stupidity to rest!

  • In all the apparent chaos and confusion, there is a very simple combination that solves a myriad of problems. Sustain our fundamental commitment to the truth, which is the basis of the human logic and belief structure and strive to do the "right thing".

    *note, After making a fundamental commitment to the truth (Only Sane Choice) can not arbitrarily dismiss God as a possibility without having breached that fundamental commitment as a fatal logic error. Insane decisions, result in insanity.

  • @waketheoblivious The dismissal of god isn't arbitary.

  • Comment removed

  • @waketheoblivious Where is your evidence for this accusation? Seriously, I would like to see the evidence. Who is carrying out the investigation? What evidence do you have that these people constitute a Nazi organisation?

  • @CarajilloDulce

    Using Federal Communications in the act of perpetrating Organized Crime is a Federal Violation. The activity was reported to Federal and International Authorities. Several who participated openly admitted they were active duty military from various countries around the world (timestamped chat logs). Espionage and Orchestrated Internet Terrorism are considered Criminal. American Servicemen participating, committed Treason, attacking God, Country, Constitution & Humanity.

  • @waketheoblivious Specifically which activity are you referring to, and who reported it? You say people who participated admitted they were actively engaged in military duty... where is this evidence available to be viewed? Are these the same people who you claim are behind the Youtube identities you quoted previously? If so, how do you know who they are? Has there been a court case? If so, please provide an exact reference.

  • @CarajilloDulce

    July 20, 2011 the Queen and Pope were both summoned to appear before an International Tribunal on charges of child trafficking. Ten months earlier Italian authorities had indicted several members of the Vatican Choir and high ranking Vatican Officials on charges of Child Pornagraphy. The evidence provided has to be so compelling it assures a conviction, before a Tribunal's summons or Italian indictment of Vatican personell are issued. News videos document the legal indictments

  • @waketheoblivious Which Queen was summoned to appear on charges of child abuse, and by whom was she summoned? It is not exactly news that child abuse has been happening in the institutions of the Catholic church. I'm not condoning it by any means, just stating how well reported it has been.

  • Given the display of "facts" with no evidence and the use of the phrase "Nazi shill", it does make me wonder if waketheoblivious is associated with, if not another pseudonym for, humanmonkeyrace/humanmonkeyrac­e2/humanmonkeyworld/nasafakedi­t/etc. I would almost say "associated with" is more likely, given waketheoblivious's lack of swearing at people that disagree with him.

  • Evolution History of Diabolical Frauds, Satanists posing as scientists:

    1913-53 Piltdown Man HOAX, Manufactured Planted Evidence

    Nebraska Man, Discarded Pigs Tooth

    Peking Man, Conglomeration of Co-Mingled Fossils

    Lucy, Manipulated Fossil Using Plaster

    Orce Man, 4 Month Old Donkey Bone

    2009 Ida, Grossly Unsupportable Classification

    2010 Sebida, equivelant of a deceased PetsMart Gerbil

    *Evolution, Satanic science of a preponderance of bullshit in lieu of irrefutable evidence

  • @waketheoblivious Hows that cool aid.

  • @guidi2005 <--------- Satanic Nazi Shill, one of the many who camp Atheism/Satanism videos 24/7 promoting their Evil Godforasaken lifestyle. Many are active duy military from around the world, engaged in an enemy Criminal attack against God, Countries, Religion, Constitution and Humanity. They are filthy evil vile Psychopathic, Egotistical Maniacs, Child Molesting Perverts, Necrophilliacs, Pedophiliacs and Satanic Serial Killers who use the convenient disguise Atheism has to offer.

  • @waketheoblivious Wow... this is one offensive retarded comment even from a religious fundamentalist.

  • @CarajilloDulce

    Fundamental Logic 101. The human logic and belief structure is predicated on a fundamental commitment to the Truth (Only Sane Choice), which inherently expands to include all possibilities. All humanity falls into Two Primary Categories. Those who Sustain their fundamental commitment to the Truth (SANE) and those who Fail their fundamental commitment to the Truth (INSANE). Members from the Two Primary Categories fill the ranks of the immaterial subcategories.

  • @waketheoblivious Who does the predicting? To what are you referring when you speak of truth? When you talk about people who sustain their fundamental commitment to the truth, are these simply people who never knowingly tell lies? What about people who basically tell the truth but would, for example, tell a lie if it meant saving their life or the life of a loved one? Into which of your categories would they fall?

  • @CarajilloDulce

    At times, there is a fine line between right & wrong. The point where light stops & darkness begins, the last bite that satisfies our hunger before the one that determines gluttony. We are responsible for our choices which are all subject to individual Self Interest. All human choices are subject to Self Interest, as are the choices of all living things, that is why there are Laws of Supply & Demand. What is right or wrong can be subject to circumstances. Thy Will be done ....

  • @CarajilloDulce

    We make hundreds to thousands of choices everyday. Some of the choices are unique when they involve the conscience. When we make the conscious choice to deliberately ignore our conscience's objections, we have knowingly done wrong. We know stealing is wrong. We know murder is wrong. We know lying is wrong. Ect. Our will satisfies our ego. Our ego has little to no value. Alter egos, that have a will of their own? Right/wrong Thy Will/our will and we do know the difference.

  • @CarajilloDulce

    Fact - Economics is a Social Science.

    Fact - Adam Smith's Classical Economic Theory, was Scientificly proven true & correct 250+ yrs ago.

    Fact - Adam Smith, deliberately used the metaphor "Invisible Hand" as synonomous with "God".

    If Adam Smith, had used the word God instead of metaphor "Invisble Hand", we'd be asking who was Adam Smith, but the Principle of Self Interest, Laws of Supply & Demand and "Invisible Hand" who created it all would still exist.

  • @CarajilloDulce

    Classical Economic Theory was proven true and correct. Followed by Keynesian Economics which eventually returned to Neo-Classical Economic Theory. Presently, there is discussion of Austrian Theory which will ultimately return to Neo Neo Classical because the Laws of Supply and Demand are Natural Laws that govern the Universe. Ignoring Classical to play Keynesian, Supply Side or Austrian pacifies those who don't disagree 1+1=2 but can't grasp, then 100+100 must = 200.

  • @CarajilloDulce

    P.S. There is an answer to the following riddle which effictively would defeat a fundamental Principle of Economics and potentially serve as an anti-thesis of the Laws of Supply and Demand, but the answer ironicly supports the very Principle it temporarily defeats. "What is a choice we can choose that is NOT subject to Self Interest, i.e. do NOT receive a psychological or material benefit"?

    Not an easy riddle, took me 20 years to find the answer which is quantifiable, 1.

  • @waketheoblivious So, basically you have chosen not to answer any of my questions regarding your accusations against other Youtube posters. I assume therefore that your allegations are simply unsubstantiated vitriolic outbursts against those individuals because they do not agree with, or have spoken out against, your fundamentalist beliefs. Right and wrong are highly subjective... in your case you obviously feel it is right to insult those who do not agree with you.

  • @CarajilloDulce

    "More evidence of your defamation of character attacks. We are still coming after you."

    - mechanicmike69

    posted 6:15 PM, 11/10/11

    Satanic Buzzard, admitting participation in Organized Crime, Espionage, Internet Terrorism & Treason. A Criminal alleging character defamation, futher proves insanity of Satanic Nazi Shills camping Atheism/Satanism videos 24/7, promoting a Godforsaken lifestyle. A direct enemy attack against God, Countries, Constitution, Religion & Humanity.

  • @waketheoblivious More religiously deluded vitriolic outbursts but still no answers to my questions regarding the authority who is investigating your allegations, associated court cases, and summonses etc..

  • @waketheoblivious

    Wow, you need psychological help.

  • @TheAntiV <----- Complete and total ignoramus

  • @waketheoblivious <--------- fucking insane nutcase who thinks he sees demons.

  • @TheAntiV <----- Complete and total ignoramus

  • @waketheoblivious

    You're not very creative are you?

  • @waketheoblivious Nope, I'm just a regular guy who works to much. nice try though, I enjoyed the read.

  • Evolution too hard to understand? Try creationism!

  • americans will distort the truth and twist reality to suit their own view. this is why america is a cesspool for the uneducated. blur the lines guys

  • -Double Face palm-

  • @waketheoblivious Clowns claiming to be scientists..... that's Kent Hovind!! He's got his own interpretation of a book of (variously translated and interpreted) bronze age myths and anecdotes which he claims to be a factual account of the creation of his remarkable 6000 year young earth. The experiment he claims to have performed to prove his hypothesis (The Hovind Theory) regarding a supposed biblical flood actually disproves the hypothesis. He's a fundamentalist preacher in a lab coat!

  • @CarajilloDulce

    Bet the farm on this fact, Evolution has never provided a legitimate "missing link". One hundred years of teaching a theory introduced with a diabolical HOAX and sustained by diabolical frauds.

  • @waketheoblivious Diabolical hoax.... sustained diabolical frauds.... sounds more like YEEC fundamentalism with an imaginary world flood, a boat load of animals, plants and insects patiently waiting a year, somehow not dying or eating one another, and some celestial deity creating everything in six days by magic. 2000 years of myths and legends passed off as fact without a shred of evidence? Con men like Hovind claiming that children played with dinosaurs and idiots paying to listen to him. Hmm.

  • The hilarious thing is. Evolutionists dont realise at the rate of erosion it is just IMPOSSIBLE for the likes of the grand canyon to be millions of years old. Mount Everest would have eroded to the ground in 14 million years, yet they try to teach us the earth is BILLIONS of years old. Atheists seriously have to question their intelligence.

  • @TheMusicMannBebo What "rate of erosion"? In case you have not noticed, Mount Everest is rising. I guess your imaginary world erosion rate is not happening there. What is causing this world wide constant uniform level of erosion? Is this another desperate attempt by YEEC fundamentalists to prove their interpretation of scripture is true?

  • @CarajilloDulce

    YECs don't understand plate tectonics or the fact it has feck all to do with evolution.

  • @FSEffect What! Plate tectonics not in the bible?

  • "It looks like science." Uh, what? CGI and muppets does not science make.