You forgot (hot) fusion! Imagine the hydrogen in a single bathtub of water supplying your energy needs for the next 30 years! Also, are you gay? cuz I think you're cute ....and rather intelligent. :)
Well, then we pretty much agree. I agree on them seeing the shift and wanting control and also wanting to get all the use out of that oil on the ground unfortunately politically and economically. I also agree we should have the power over our energy, Nicola Tesla comes to mind. We should focus on safe energy for sure. I mean we put a man on the moon so...
While I think you make some good points overall I have to strongly disagree here. Let me explain. Solar, wind, water etc should be used in tandem and intergrated. And the fact that you think conservation in tandem with these is useless, well I think you are totally wrong. Even 70 years ago there were carborators that could get 70 miles per gallon. Think about the likelihood of now that being much higher. It would cut use and emmissions drastically.
And lets not forget while we integrate these safe uses oif energy research will take the forefront and what is solar, wind and water is now would be quickly surpassed. I think we have to see the facts that it's not that safer power could not be developed to make the shift but that corporate powers that be don't want the shift. It would take power away from those whole hold it now and to them thats a no no...
Oh, no. cCrporate powers do see the shift coming, but the want to be in charge of that shift. That way, the energy companies can always have a stranglehold over their costumers. Power over energy should rest in the hands of the populace, a municipal power.
It's not that I think alternative energy is useless, I think t need to be better developed, or when the oil runs out in 20 years, we are all fucked.
Regarding nuclear, half of the supposed waste, plutonium, could be fissioned for more energy. Nuclear also doesn't emit any CO2, except for the petrol used in mining it. It's not renewable, but it would at least allow more time for research.
Maybe one day we'll gather solar energy with satellities in orbit and transmit it back to earth, perhaps with lasers or microwaves. The light is much more intense up there.
why that funny background music? why gay as a tag?
rodstartube 4 years ago
You forgot (hot) fusion! Imagine the hydrogen in a single bathtub of water supplying your energy needs for the next 30 years! Also, are you gay? cuz I think you're cute ....and rather intelligent. :)
10mintwo 4 years ago
Fusion has its own bag full of problems, so I didnät really hit on it. And, of course I'm gay!
AzrielSivad 4 years ago
Very well thought out video. I would like to vote for covering Utah in solar panels at this point.
AdviceToMyClones 4 years ago
It is quite a useless state. We'll just have to air lift the tabernacle, a tomb of God.
AzrielSivad 4 years ago
Well, then we pretty much agree. I agree on them seeing the shift and wanting control and also wanting to get all the use out of that oil on the ground unfortunately politically and economically. I also agree we should have the power over our energy, Nicola Tesla comes to mind. We should focus on safe energy for sure. I mean we put a man on the moon so...
antidote7 4 years ago
Glad we agree. Tesla kicks Edison's ass any day. We put en on the moon using hydrocarbons.
AzrielSivad 4 years ago
While I think you make some good points overall I have to strongly disagree here. Let me explain. Solar, wind, water etc should be used in tandem and intergrated. And the fact that you think conservation in tandem with these is useless, well I think you are totally wrong. Even 70 years ago there were carborators that could get 70 miles per gallon. Think about the likelihood of now that being much higher. It would cut use and emmissions drastically.
antidote7 4 years ago
And lets not forget while we integrate these safe uses oif energy research will take the forefront and what is solar, wind and water is now would be quickly surpassed. I think we have to see the facts that it's not that safer power could not be developed to make the shift but that corporate powers that be don't want the shift. It would take power away from those whole hold it now and to them thats a no no...
antidote7 4 years ago
Oh, no. cCrporate powers do see the shift coming, but the want to be in charge of that shift. That way, the energy companies can always have a stranglehold over their costumers. Power over energy should rest in the hands of the populace, a municipal power.
It's not that I think alternative energy is useless, I think t need to be better developed, or when the oil runs out in 20 years, we are all fucked.
AzrielSivad 4 years ago
Intersting.
Regarding nuclear, half of the supposed waste, plutonium, could be fissioned for more energy. Nuclear also doesn't emit any CO2, except for the petrol used in mining it. It's not renewable, but it would at least allow more time for research.
Maybe one day we'll gather solar energy with satellities in orbit and transmit it back to earth, perhaps with lasers or microwaves. The light is much more intense up there.
theinquisitor 4 years ago