this is amazing. im just writing a research design to test theory of mind and though id check some videos.could it be that perhaps the complexity of the story is what is hard for the child to understand (follow the sequences) and not so much the actual thinking of the mom? im trying to eliminate confounding variables on my research...
The first story is very artifical and requires a great understanding of semantics and its relationship with the application of pragmatics. he is so youuunnnggg!
The first thing he said is juice, now he trusted the authorative figure who represents his parents and trusted. Why would she make ribbons come out the box? From 0-6 years children are like sponges..Their knowledge is acquired by those around them..I am still a bit perplexed by the first situation where the woman put ribbons in the juice box? That is not reality. Now he would look dumb if he is in the store saying where's the ribbons in the juice box..lol.. Perversion of innocent induced here..
@sensualwisdom570 I think you're overestimating the possible effects of this experiment, they wouldn't teach or impress the child with anything that either couldn't be corrected or would have long term detrimental social effects on the child, that would be unethical...
@Abunchanada what is the trolling??? It is unethical too teache a child that ribbons come out of a juice box..Why implant something that needs too be corrected..I thought as psychologists/psyciatrists we are too eradicate such type formed behaviors not instill them, especially in children..Again a perversion of innocence..I am taking this for more or less than what it is, making the child a dunce...Would you like a cup of Waiting for Superman? yea
The whole point is to figure out how to children thinks, that they are egocentric : which means that they believe everyone thinks and sees the same things as they do. They're not destroying a child's innocence. They are trying to prove a theory, Either way, how would making ribbons come out of a juice box make a child less innocent? It's not like the ribbons will harm the child. I don't think the child thinks that ribbons always come out of juice boxes just because it did once
@lavieennoire no, I beg to differ. The child must have been taught that juice comes out of the box just like any other person would think would come out of a juice box. For an authorative figure too try too make the child think any different I believe again is an attempt too perverse their innocence because they are taking advantage. The child is saying what he has been taught. If he was not taught that juice comes out of the box he would have said I dont know. Why attempt to teach ribbons?
@sensualwisdom570 they are not attempting to teach ribbons, if they ask him a few months later he will answer correctly. He doesn't go home and say he doesn't want the juice box because there are ribbons in them.
@annefien Again, I beg to differ, the young boy said juice then she displayed ribbons. You claim that he will not mimic this nonsensical taunt. So why would he say "Jess" would think there are ribbons in the box. Jean Piaget Schemata and stages display the neurological abilities and how they are displayed at different ages. Why try to manipulate? Would you like a cup of "Waiting for Superman" as well to go with the muffins?
this is amazing. im just writing a research design to test theory of mind and though id check some videos.could it be that perhaps the complexity of the story is what is hard for the child to understand (follow the sequences) and not so much the actual thinking of the mom? im trying to eliminate confounding variables on my research...
alinecalves 2 months ago
@Zmaster4000 I must just say something to you. I LOVE you for putting this up. THANK YOU! :)
ZeusDeusEx 2 months ago
nevermind
LiHonora196 2 months ago
badass
NPMerilyn358 3 months ago
pretty good
NWMiranda297 3 months ago
Innocence+Dumbness = 3-4 years old Kid.
Innocence+Intelligence= Godliness!
raghu2096 4 months ago
absolutely great:)
EaSiCerulVerde 10 months ago
has anyone found the Smarties False belief task? I have been looking for it everywhere and still cannot find it....
nyk323 10 months ago
i'm assuming a lot of us are just here because of psyc100..
tarrybear333 11 months ago
The mean monkey lady has the most annoying voice ever.
MerlinTheDraconic 11 months ago
The first story is very artifical and requires a great understanding of semantics and its relationship with the application of pragmatics. he is so youuunnnggg!
ninecastles 1 year ago
The first thing he said is juice, now he trusted the authorative figure who represents his parents and trusted. Why would she make ribbons come out the box? From 0-6 years children are like sponges..Their knowledge is acquired by those around them..I am still a bit perplexed by the first situation where the woman put ribbons in the juice box? That is not reality. Now he would look dumb if he is in the store saying where's the ribbons in the juice box..lol.. Perversion of innocent induced here..
sensualwisdom570 1 year ago
@sensualwisdom570 I think you're overestimating the possible effects of this experiment, they wouldn't teach or impress the child with anything that either couldn't be corrected or would have long term detrimental social effects on the child, that would be unethical...
or you could be trollin
Abunchanada 1 year ago
@Abunchanada what is the trolling??? It is unethical too teache a child that ribbons come out of a juice box..Why implant something that needs too be corrected..I thought as psychologists/psyciatrists we are too eradicate such type formed behaviors not instill them, especially in children..Again a perversion of innocence..I am taking this for more or less than what it is, making the child a dunce...Would you like a cup of Waiting for Superman? yea
sensualwisdom570 1 year ago
@sensualwisdom570
The whole point is to figure out how to children thinks, that they are egocentric : which means that they believe everyone thinks and sees the same things as they do. They're not destroying a child's innocence. They are trying to prove a theory, Either way, how would making ribbons come out of a juice box make a child less innocent? It's not like the ribbons will harm the child. I don't think the child thinks that ribbons always come out of juice boxes just because it did once
lavieennoire 1 year ago
@lavieennoire no, I beg to differ. The child must have been taught that juice comes out of the box just like any other person would think would come out of a juice box. For an authorative figure too try too make the child think any different I believe again is an attempt too perverse their innocence because they are taking advantage. The child is saying what he has been taught. If he was not taught that juice comes out of the box he would have said I dont know. Why attempt to teach ribbons?
sensualwisdom570 1 year ago
@sensualwisdom570 they are not attempting to teach ribbons, if they ask him a few months later he will answer correctly. He doesn't go home and say he doesn't want the juice box because there are ribbons in them.
annefien 5 months ago
@annefien Again, I beg to differ, the young boy said juice then she displayed ribbons. You claim that he will not mimic this nonsensical taunt. So why would he say "Jess" would think there are ribbons in the box. Jean Piaget Schemata and stages display the neurological abilities and how they are displayed at different ages. Why try to manipulate? Would you like a cup of "Waiting for Superman" as well to go with the muffins?
sensualwisdom570 4 months ago
@lavieennoire jus ignore the hater man, he jus be trollin
Abunchanada 1 year ago