He was a very experienced pilot delivering plane to a buyer, Prevailing head winds picked up in route. He was being tracked by airline pilots, and was working with the engine manufacture to figure out the right fuel mixture for maximum efficiency, as well as communicating with the coast guard and ATC. That is why the Coast Guard was exactly at the place the pilot predicted he would run out of fuel, 13 miles short on a 2,400 mile crossing.
@ButterOnMyBiscuit You do realise once upon a time, and even today, aircraft as small as a 172 are flown to Australia/NZ. There are companies still doing it and a lot of guys I work with did it when they were younger.
@ButterOnMyBiscuit Big difference between a calculated risk and being an idiot! Unless you never leave your bedroom you take (albeit smaller) risks every day. How else is this airplane supposed to get delivered? It is something done all the time. If you see one traffic accident will you quit driving forever? He had a 99% chance of success, but the winds changed. Stuff happens! Better to live life than hide from it!
@N137LA Lots come over that way now, the problem is it is still sometimes more expensive. Having the thing put back together and certified by CASA costs a small fortune.
@gnarkillkicksass Yeah but at the same time, its much more of a logical/ safer way of shipping an aircraft overseas. Even if he could have made it with enough fuel, twin piston aircraft, or piston aircraft in general, don't nearly have the reliability and safety level as a turbine aircraft. Plus, 5,000' MSL? Can't glide much when your engines fail.
@N137LA Safer yes and now days more cost effective but for the last 30 years the majority of light a/c were ferried across the Pacific. It was easier and more cost effective back then hence more logical to owners and operators. and not as dangerous as most think. It mustn't have been pleasant though having a big fuel bladder on board, I know a guy who ditched twice, once at night. Apparently the USCG sent a C-130 out that made a flare path for him and dropped a raft with a strobe nearby.
@gnarkillkicksass As a pilot myself, I would never attempt such a flight in a piston aircraft. But your right; a lot of people do in fact ferry aircraft across the Pacific and Atlantic. In 1985, a man at my local airport, flew his Taylorcraft L-2M across the Atlantic Ocean.
Go air dales
Me3xe45 1 month ago
Everything planning aside, excellently preformed ditching.
zimsplat 3 months ago
He was a very experienced pilot delivering plane to a buyer, Prevailing head winds picked up in route. He was being tracked by airline pilots, and was working with the engine manufacture to figure out the right fuel mixture for maximum efficiency, as well as communicating with the coast guard and ATC. That is why the Coast Guard was exactly at the place the pilot predicted he would run out of fuel, 13 miles short on a 2,400 mile crossing.
sehr56 4 months ago 2
Comment removed
7GolfAlpha 4 months ago
Cali to Hawaii is a ferry ride now?
it takes 5 hours by commercial jet going about 500 mph....
how fast is a Cessna? 205 mph with a 1000-1500 mile range
hawaii is over 2,000 miles away
pilot is an idiot
ButterOnMyBiscuit 4 months ago 3
@ButterOnMyBiscuit It's not that he is an idiot. He was ferrying the airplane and messed up on some fuel calculations... so a bit of an idiot :)
Thefeed 4 months ago 2
@Thefeed LOL, just a bit of an idiot...very good! Gotta hate those pesky head winds when it comes to fuel calcs, live and learn, glad he is okay.
timmonst70 4 months ago
@ButterOnMyBiscuit You do realise once upon a time, and even today, aircraft as small as a 172 are flown to Australia/NZ. There are companies still doing it and a lot of guys I work with did it when they were younger.
gnarkillkicksass 4 months ago
@ButterOnMyBiscuit Big difference between a calculated risk and being an idiot! Unless you never leave your bedroom you take (albeit smaller) risks every day. How else is this airplane supposed to get delivered? It is something done all the time. If you see one traffic accident will you quit driving forever? He had a 99% chance of success, but the winds changed. Stuff happens! Better to live life than hide from it!
h2otek 1 month ago
I want this job I want to ferry pilot over exteem distance, load up extra tanks,
mayamachine 4 months ago
Lost the airplane for 13 miles... That guy must be hating on himself right now!
pedroca2424 4 months ago
That could have gone much differently. :)
l80sman104 4 months ago
Poor planning, great water landing.
xr650lguy 4 months ago
Why the hell would you take a Cessna 310 from Monterey, CA to Hawaii?
7GolfAlpha 4 months ago 5
@7GolfAlpha exactly what i'm thinking..
lovUSAhj 4 months ago
@7GolfAlpha haha I know right. I don't know much about planes but that sounds BURLY!
kemicon 4 months ago
To get to the other side.
myleftbrain 4 months ago
@7GolfAlpha because You cant ship meth by Fed Ex.
supressorgrid 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@7GolfAlpha Ok, so lets get this straight; 1978 Cessna T310R, KMRY- PHTO (2319 miles direct) , cruise speed, 180 knots (or 207 mph), with 203 gallons, (possibly more)? About 21 GPH: 9.6 hours, about 2,000 mile range, (more with winds aloft in favor)? Pretty damn close, if you ask me.
7GolfAlpha 4 months ago 2
@7GolfAlpha How else are they moved there? Hell, 172s etc used to be FLOWN across the Pacific to deliver them to Australia. Some still are.
gnarkillkicksass 4 months ago
@gnarkillkicksass How about taking the wings off and shipping it over in a shipping crate?
N137LA 4 months ago
@N137LA Lots come over that way now, the problem is it is still sometimes more expensive. Having the thing put back together and certified by CASA costs a small fortune.
gnarkillkicksass 4 months ago
@gnarkillkicksass Yeah but at the same time, its much more of a logical/ safer way of shipping an aircraft overseas. Even if he could have made it with enough fuel, twin piston aircraft, or piston aircraft in general, don't nearly have the reliability and safety level as a turbine aircraft. Plus, 5,000' MSL? Can't glide much when your engines fail.
N137LA 4 months ago
@N137LA Safer yes and now days more cost effective but for the last 30 years the majority of light a/c were ferried across the Pacific. It was easier and more cost effective back then hence more logical to owners and operators. and not as dangerous as most think. It mustn't have been pleasant though having a big fuel bladder on board, I know a guy who ditched twice, once at night. Apparently the USCG sent a C-130 out that made a flare path for him and dropped a raft with a strobe nearby.
gnarkillkicksass 4 months ago
@gnarkillkicksass As a pilot myself, I would never attempt such a flight in a piston aircraft. But your right; a lot of people do in fact ferry aircraft across the Pacific and Atlantic. In 1985, a man at my local airport, flew his Taylorcraft L-2M across the Atlantic Ocean.
N137LA 4 months ago
Rescue divers are trained to stay with the basket to be sure it is stabilized during the retraction....then drop off.
skipde 4 months ago
A modern day Sullenberger!
farmerfranck 4 months ago
@farmerfranck cuz that was so long ago...
64wing 4 months ago
Pretty choppy seas....really nice job flying.
delloo 4 months ago
@delloo
Considering its open ocean, its pretty calm.
HDaviator 4 months ago
@delloo nice flying???!!!? right up until the part where he ran out of fuel!!! entirely pilot error
hunterTS4 4 months ago
Crazy stuff, but nice to see the pilot made it out alright!
AmericanAviator 4 months ago
God bless the US Coast Guard and their Rescue Swimers!
RegularGuy76 4 months ago
Hrm, not sure. Maybe to add some weight during the initial lift so it doesn't swing like crazy?
LoudestHoward 4 months ago
Why did the rescue diver cling to the basket momentarily?
NoClassic 4 months ago