I think the most promising PRT I have seen is the one inside Masdar Institute in Abu Dhabi. It is very convenient and driving on the normal road without the need of tracks or guide beam. UN Sec General Ban Ki Moon tried the vehicle.
and HOW this prevent's traffic jams if everybody just leaves theyre cars and move into Pods? same thing only now there is no way of passing each other or getting down in case of failure?
@prohumets Instead of people controlling the vehicle a computer controls it. That way vehicles can move at a consistent speed even though they are close to each other.
@mdao3000 We have heard of a bicycle. But with a PRT, they can go where bicycles can't go. PRT pods can travel into buildings thru certain doors. PRT routes can trave along Interstate highways. Bicycles are not allowed on Interstate highways.
The pods only go one way, which will lead to unnecessarily long journey times - to be an efficient and flexible system, I'm sure you need to be able to travel both ways. I think ULTRA seems better, though this is prettier!
@davidmcnaught ULTra uses batteries in every vehicle, leading to a higher cost per vehicle, whereas other systems use a third rail. Personally, I think the third rail is a cheaper and more sensible option because vehicles never have to charge up. And with one way loops, the time added to go a few hundred extra meters really isn't that much to consider, especially since the riders are sitting comfortably in little cars.
The reason why WVU's system, which has been doing this for close to 40 years, is ignored is simple.
A) Because its located in West Virginia
B) Because its located in West Virginia
and
C) See A and B
Boeing designed and made the system for WVU back in the early 70's, when energy efficiency was 'hip' and 'cool'. Then when we were allowed to have cheap energy prices again from the arabs we largely forgot about PRT and transit systems. Now that its popular again, its also being reinvented.
WVU has had a system almost like this since the 70's created by Boeing. Our cars travel both ways though. So, I do not see how this system is the first of its kind.
I used to like PRT's pod design better than ULTra, but ULTra is far more practical. PRT uses rail which is more costly to maintain than the tires used by ULTra
see the station in the right bottom corner? say ur there, and want to go to the bottom upper corner, ud have to travel a LONG way in the other direction, and then doubleback on urself >.>
@SatoTM2 Looks close enough to walk in sunny weather, but if it's pouring down rain... I don't think it'd be that long a distance, either: at ~25mph, a two-mile loop takes ~5 mins. In Redmond at 4pm, it can take longer than that--no matter what surface transportation method you choose.
I was the executive producer on both this Cities21/Bettercampus video and the ultra prt video. There are no copying issues. Yes, some of the script was recycled.
Yet heathrow Pods is the only true system that is going today.
MrSquareart 2 weeks ago
miPod
malcolmry 7 months ago
i'm saving this video to my favorites...awesome.
BatusaiJack 11 months ago
I think the most promising PRT I have seen is the one inside Masdar Institute in Abu Dhabi. It is very convenient and driving on the normal road without the need of tracks or guide beam. UN Sec General Ban Ki Moon tried the vehicle.
jag3965 1 year ago
and HOW this prevent's traffic jams if everybody just leaves theyre cars and move into Pods? same thing only now there is no way of passing each other or getting down in case of failure?
prohumets 1 year ago
@prohumets Instead of people controlling the vehicle a computer controls it. That way vehicles can move at a consistent speed even though they are close to each other.
robertweinberg1993 5 months ago
So apparently Americans haven't heard of a bicycle
mdao3000 1 year ago
@mdao3000 We have heard of a bicycle. But with a PRT, they can go where bicycles can't go. PRT pods can travel into buildings thru certain doors. PRT routes can trave along Interstate highways. Bicycles are not allowed on Interstate highways.
Streetcar1743 1 month ago
that man is very 'special'...
jamwithmates123 1 year ago
The pods only go one way, which will lead to unnecessarily long journey times - to be an efficient and flexible system, I'm sure you need to be able to travel both ways. I think ULTRA seems better, though this is prettier!
davidmcnaught 1 year ago
@davidmcnaught ULTra uses batteries in every vehicle, leading to a higher cost per vehicle, whereas other systems use a third rail. Personally, I think the third rail is a cheaper and more sensible option because vehicles never have to charge up. And with one way loops, the time added to go a few hundred extra meters really isn't that much to consider, especially since the riders are sitting comfortably in little cars.
jeffsandychelsea 5 months ago
The reason why WVU's system, which has been doing this for close to 40 years, is ignored is simple.
A) Because its located in West Virginia
B) Because its located in West Virginia
and
C) See A and B
Boeing designed and made the system for WVU back in the early 70's, when energy efficiency was 'hip' and 'cool'. Then when we were allowed to have cheap energy prices again from the arabs we largely forgot about PRT and transit systems. Now that its popular again, its also being reinvented.
Vendetta73 1 year ago
this is just like Malaysia's monorail!
except, there is no driver, and its divided into small pods
tri400 1 year ago
WVU has had a system almost like this since the 70's created by Boeing. Our cars travel both ways though. So, I do not see how this system is the first of its kind.
fdsa9846 1 year ago
@fdsa9846 how does it travel both ways?
astrialkil 6 months ago
Dear All,
I have some questions about psychology:
(1) Why do we love space-age architecture?
(2) Why do we like to travel in space-age transportation system, suah as Microsoft Campus PRT?
(3) If Microsoft Campus PRT can floating in the air, will this attractive to passengers?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!! :)
applesweeter 1 year ago
I used to like PRT's pod design better than ULTra, but ULTra is far more practical. PRT uses rail which is more costly to maintain than the tires used by ULTra
kmarinas86 2 years ago
freeze ar 0:34
see the station in the right bottom corner? say ur there, and want to go to the bottom upper corner, ud have to travel a LONG way in the other direction, and then doubleback on urself >.>
SatoTM2 2 years ago
@SatoTM2 Looks close enough to walk in sunny weather, but if it's pouring down rain... I don't think it'd be that long a distance, either: at ~25mph, a two-mile loop takes ~5 mins. In Redmond at 4pm, it can take longer than that--no matter what surface transportation method you choose.
cincushin 1 year ago
@SatoTM2 use a second loop going the opposite direction across the street !
astrialkil 6 months ago
This is cool, but ULTra is so much better.
wishingstar22 2 years ago
I've had visions of this system.
FATGIRLSRHOT 2 years ago
this sounds a lot like the ULTra video...
sammydenyc 2 years ago
It is a COPY of it!
seeder122 2 years ago
I was the executive producer on both this Cities21/Bettercampus video and the ultra prt video. There are no copying issues. Yes, some of the script was recycled.
esbielab 2 years ago
es ist einfach genial
NikolaPantic93 2 years ago
those vehicles look really ugly
IntercityAPT 2 years ago
woah shit this is like futuristic
Freedom21stCenturi 2 years ago
cool idea ^^
madmax10101 3 years ago
I have seen this 109 times and would like to see more then this.
747K 4 years ago