Law and Economics (by Hans-Hermann Hoppe) - Introduction to Austrian Economics, 11of11

[UnderTheTunk]

Shouldn't we mention another alternative to self-ownership that might occur to egalitarians, namely that no one owns anyone, even himself? Of course, this would be nonsensical as well, seeing as how ownership implies control, and if nobody owned himself all human beings would be total vegetables, incapable of thought or action.

[PSExposed]

Ærgerligt han var så konservativt anlagt ang. immigration. Tak for upload, dog!

[FreddyFuFu]

Universal communism can be implemented if we couple it with implicit universal permission. We just add the rule that everything is permitted until someone complains. Then, the community solves the conflict.

[dieyoung]

Nielsio, you are a valuable an-cap ambassador, we need more like you!

[DieTheDeath]

what's he talking about "agony"? more like bliss.

[amagilly]

sturdy shoulders of a giant

[PJCelis]

I love listening to civilized people.

[davyjames]

Did you record this yourself Nielsio? Thank you either way. Awesomeness!

[Nielsio]

@davyjames No, this was recorded in Denmark in 2005, before I even knew what Austrian Economics was.

[return135]

Hans looks youthful!

[paulvahur]

Thank you again for posting the series, it was good to go over basics again :-)

[truevoice08]

Congratulations! Recording and posting these lectures is a big contribution. Thank you thank you thank you!

[Nielsio]

@truevoice08 Thanks guys.

[truevoice08]

@Nielsio Do you have any plans of posting Defending the Undefendable? Man would that be so cool! Every chapter is just about 13 minutes and carries dynamite arguments. It would be more practical than posting parts of Human Action.

[bonkers45]

@truevoice08

Here it is in mp3: google "defending the undefendable audio" (without the quotes) and it's the first result