Added: 2 years ago
From: chiquitheaven
Views: 165,561
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,559)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Under Marcos Philippines stayed ranked economically no.3 in the region compared to its asian neighbors behind the japon and inchik, when Marcos took over in 1965 our position at no.3 he continued for 21 years all until his illegal ousting and the trickery of the media & journalism buddies, friends & classmates of that Idiot good for nothing journalist turned senator of Tarlac Buboy Benigno Aquino, Marcos is a career Public servant from his days serving in Uniform AFP, & his ascent to Presidency

  • and this bitch is still living freely in the philippines? she had to be rotting in jail.

  • @roquintos yes i hate the Aquinos and all their supporters I like a LOYAList a performer of the Philippines who dawned the Philippine Army Uniform and served to defedn the shores of Philippines agains the Japon as a Volunteer not like aquino who is a journalist turned senator by way of his money and his parents of tarlac, People certainly fooled and tricked us to believing the Marcos's were bad people when infact they are GREAT fuck the Media, even Kings & Queens stole to be powerful in Europe !

  • her husband was a damn thief, and she an evil witch. and while the people starved, fucking bastards.

  • @roquintos ya your right alot of people stole from Marcos and Imelda, if not for the Marcos's Philippines would be a more wealthy advanced country by now heavilsy supported by the allied countries of Spain and U.K. as the United States also supported Marcos for 21 years until his illegal ousting in 1986, bur even then the Great Strong Democratic U.S.A. harbor Marcos in Hawaii 50th state with intentions 2 overthrow Cory by coup atempt and reinstall Marcos&Family I hate thos bastard inchik Aquinos

  • gold lover imelda mahiya ka pati si marcos dinamay mo at imelda baka yung ibig sabihin na beautiful ni marcos lahat ng bibilhin mo ay ikagaganda ng bansa baka ginawa mo lang all you by is beauty baka all you buy must be prosperity to country. ang totoo lang sinabi ni imelda ay rich si marcos kasi dahil sa treasure na nakita nya habang gerilya siya

  • @iota1962 ACTUALLY WHEN MARCOS TOOK OVER IN 1965 PINAS WAS RANKED ECONOMICALLY NO.3 BEHIND THE JAPON AND INCHIK, MARCOS KEPT PHILIPPINE RANKED NO.3 FOR 21YRS UNTIL HIS ILLEGAL OUSTING IN 1986, THAT IS ANOTHER REASON WHY MARCOS WAS HARBORED BY THE U.S.A. IN THE FIFTYTH STATE OF HAWAII AND SO MANY COUP ATTEMPTS AGAINST CORY TO OUST HER AND RE INSTALL MARCOS BACK TO POWER UNFORTUNATELY THE CIA WAS NOT ABLE TO WITH ENIRLE AND RAMOS ADVISING CORY, IN THE WHOLE SCENARIO ENRILE MADE OUT THE BEST IN IT!

  • I like marcus... I HATE IMELDA! GREEDY IMELDA!

  • @imperialtalents I WOULD LIKE TO ADD, THAT IMELDA CAN NEVER BE TO GREEDY, THE SIMPLE FACT IS THAT SHE AUTOMATICALLY INHERITED OR MARRIED INTO MONEY, SOMETIMES PEOPLE CANT EVEN EXPLAIN THE VAST AMOUNTS OF MONEY THE MARCOS HAVE IN U.S. DOLLARS NOT PHILIPPINE PESO, WHEN INFACT MARCOS MONEY IS WAY PAST ANY WB OR IMF OR PHILIPPINE SO CALLED TREASUREY, MARCOS MONEY IS MARCOS MONEY, IMELDA CAN SPEND &SPEND TILL SHE DIES &STILL WILL HAVE MONEY i SAY PUT HER IN CHARGE OF PHILIPPINES IF U WANT2 GO SUMWER!

  • WELL for my observation FUK THE SYSTEM MEDIA manipulating other people as of this month i asked what marcos is they said he steal ph treasure but i dont belive

  • sabi ng lolo ko, mas maganda daw pamamalakad ni ni Marcos noon..low crime kasi takot ang mga tao gumawa ng hindi maganda kasi lagot kay Marcos, ibig sabihin kinakatakutan..at kung kurakot man cla atleast cla lang nangu2rakot! |Eh ngaun..!! halos lahat na kurakot! cmula pangulo, senators, governors, kahit Brgy officials kurakot na din! so cmula ugat hanggang bunga na! kaya wala na acnso ang pinas!!

  • Shit president , shit wife , no morals or shit morals whatever you

    prefer . The " best president  ' , loved by his people so much he escaped via the roog and an American puppet helicopter . ! Zanga Zanga my people love me . ! Ha Ha

  • @XLENDIBAY1 I agree Marcos is the best President and yes If your a communist you should just kill yourself by chocking on an American hotdog !

  • **ITS ACTUALLY THE BEST PRESIDENT PHILIPPINE EVER HAD---just simply bcoz the status of our country was better in comparison to our asian neighbors and in the world in general**

  • si imelda ang ULO nang nakawan sa kanya nag simula sakanya nag simula maging makasarili ang pilipino siya ang may dahilan inuna niya ang sarili 2 trilion $ pera nang pinas noon kung pag sasamahin yung gold raming account si marcos

  • @darkzoneo144 Yes I agree Imelda never stole any money not even money of the Philippines, its sad to say that the journalism buddies and friends of Fake senator of tarlac Baboy Ninoy Aquino tried to fool or trick people into believing the Freedom is more important than, Marcos teaching of strictness, adherence to Martial Law and Loyalty these things needed to compete agains the top country of Japan at the time who have people of high integrity, Loyalty, strictnees and way of life of the Japon!

  • @zeppaify yeah you're rite even if im just 15 i belive on marcoses PEOPLE ARE JUST IGNORANT NOWADAYS because i think media rule the ph thats why it sucks

  • @darkzoneo144 hello if you goto this video (Ferdinand Marcos And Imelda Marcos Downfall Part 2) read a few of page one comments by "Amoreden1" and on page 3, 4, 5

    comments by (SYZygy588) they are also very informative if not a great reading from some Loyalists here on youtube. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you! Oh and yes becoz we have latin blood or Spanish blood not only are Filipino bound by Chis Mis but if we dont wise-up, media is a great server of fooling many people to dumbness!

  • tanong ko lang anu ba ang pinatayo ni Cory na pinapakinabangan ng bayan ngaun?

  • Bulag lang ang magsabing magnanakaw si Marcos.

    Patunayan niyo muna bago kayo magsalita mga unghang!

  • exactly yes..marcos is good..

    imelda marcos and fredinadand is the best tandem..in the history of the republic of the philippines...

  • your husband is mag nanakaw ...swapang sa pera at pati na ikaw Puta imelda..

  • @bluegreen988 STUPID MARCOS NEVER STEAL GOLD OR MONIES FROM FILIPINOS, YOU STUPID U.K. IGNORAMOUS, HIPPOTAMOUS, MARCOS CANNOT STEAL MONEY FROM VERY MANY LOTS OF VERY POOR, POOR, POOR, 3RD WORLD FILIPINOS, TO ACQUIRE HIS WEALTH, THINK FOR A MOMMENT, WHAT THE OPPOSITION COMMUNISTS, NPA AND INCHIK AQUINOS TELL YOU, THAT MARCOS STOLE THE MONEY FROM PHILIPPINE PEOPLE, NOW TELL ME WHERE DID FILIPINOS ACQUIRE GOLD AND WEALTH WHERE DID THEY HIDE IT UNDER THEIR PILLOWS, STUPIDO MARCOS MONEY IS MAROCS'S !

  • @zeppaify oy tangang kupal ..kahit ano sabihin mo si Marcos ay mag nanakaw bobo..mandayara every election sa pinas..matakaw sa pera..

  • @bluegreen988 GAGA no gold mines in Philippines produce cut rubbies and gold bricks Gago, that is not treasures of Roxas, all those are already confescated by the govt. during that time the Marcos is the govt. so if there is anything it will go to the Govt. even if it is Marcos, so there is no way Marcos's stole from Filipinos such as a Roxas since he is not the owner of treasures on Philippine land that is not his, so if there is really any treasure Roxas cannot keep it, he was lieing anyway !

  • @bluegreen988 Yes I watch the documentary, and as with many documentaries situated and also propagandaed to go against the Marcos's once again they present many conclusions but when it is time to produce the evidence in a court of law, when waiting what happen no evididencia nothing so of course the Marcos's will win in a court of law, so if Roxas is not truthful then he deserves to have penalty, punishment or beaten just like the NPA or criminal communistas, even in England they torture people!

  • Yes I agree Marcos;s never steal from the Filipino people, the media act like that every Filipino is hiding thousands of dollars under neath their pillows, and the Marcos went to each home or bank account and got all the wealth of the people, as if the country is not a 3rd world country infact if not for the Marcos's the Philippines would have failed even faster by the early 70's if not 4 martial law and marcos strong relation ship and partnrership with U.S.A. the country who make the internet

  • @bluegreen988 YOUR THE PUTA, AND WHERE DID THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND GET HER GOLD AND RICHES FROM, YES FROM STEALING IT FROM OTHER COUNTRIES BEFORE THATS HOW THE ROYALTY GET THEIR WEALTH BY WAR ING AND GOING TO OTHER POOR COUNTRIES AND GETTING THEIR GOLD, THATS HOW THE ROYALS RECIEVE THEIR WEALTH & YOU LIVE IN U.K, AND YOU DONT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THE BRITISH COLONIES, GAGA, INSTEAD OF CALLING YOUR OWN PEOPLE, BANSA PUTA, THINK ABOUT THE WORLD AND BE PRACTICAL, PPL LIKE YOU DESTROY OUR POWN COUNTRY!

  • @bluegreen988 Yes I agree, lots of Whit England U.K. Royals steal from poor black, brown &even Balikbayanas as yourself who now live in England, do you see or hear people talk about how the Royals or your royals steal from countries before when they are colonies, for instance Jamaica is an English colony which the British siphon all the goods materials etc. etc. out of it, to make England and the Royals rich, what did the Royals do 2 England make it a Top country &you use the word Nanakaw GAGA!

  • @bluegreen988 yes I AGREE BRITIAN AND THE U.S. ARE SOLID AND SIDE BY SIDE COUNTRIES THEY ARE ONE OF THE STRONGEST RELATIONSHIPS AND PARTNERSHIPS, BEFORE WHEN MARCOS IS IN CHARGE OF PINAS THE U.S. MILITARY AND BRITISH MILITARY COME AND DO JOINT OPERATIONS AND TRAINING IN PHILIPPINES, THE U.S. PROTECT THE BORDERS OF PHILIPPINES AND THE BRITISH ALSO COME BY AND VISIT, NOTICE THAT THERE ARE SO MANY BRITISH WHITE MALES LOOKING FOR FILIPINAS, OR PUTAS, WELL NOW YOU KNOW AND KNOWING IS HALF THE BATTLE!

  • @bluegreen988 yes I agree your a Puta From U.K. that is why you went there hahhahahaha!

  • @bluegreen988 Yes I agree since Marcos left Philippines has been a failing country it is not even in the top 3 ranked economically since Marcos left, hahahhaha maybe its me but when Marcos was illegally ousted the brother country of the United States of America who backed Marcos harbored the Marcos family in the 50ty th state of Hawaii, hahahahha maybe if Philippines is also a British Colony before they would have sent Marcos to Hawaii also since Hawaii was also a territory or land owned by u.k.

  • @bluegreen988 did you watch the surigao treasure documentary titled Gintong Pamana? Tapos watch the yamashita treasure, marcos tortured roxas for the gold he found in baguio. i think that if the phils. was teeming with gold & we had a sophisticated gold culture & craftmanship, someone else must've gotten to it. i think the japanese may have excavated phil. treasure by the bulk, hid them & marcos may have stolen some of what was recovered, ie. roxas, torturing roxas.

  • continued-

    at you get if you are a enemy of the state or country or deemed a threat to the sworn in govt. your pentalty is what you get, many more millions of people did not complain or come fwd only a few out of millions those who were guilty and sin

  • continued-

    is father loosers and failures, seriously if that guy didnt have last name of Aquino no one would even pay him a 2nd glance he is by far the useless son of a bitch known to man !

  • continued-

    debating about Marcos is futile, America harbor Marcos in Hawaii Marcos is not like sadam, kadafffi, or even hitler, Marcos is most like the Germans Scientists who were hurried to america because they are worth something !!

  • continued-

    a military guy who knows how to keep things classified for the country when all the media is trying to make a news and sell newspapers while comprimising Pinas itself!

  • continued-

    Marcos building and Imeldas beautifuying we were on our way until the opposition derailed progress and advancement

  • continued-

    and downs of the markets including the price of oil during that time such as today but the opposition picks and choses what they print, say or publish against Marcos before !

  • I agree bigjoe and to Thudothwacker Marcos is the best since 1965 !

  • I agree bigjoe and to Thudothwacker Marcos money is not all suseptable to garnish because it is their money the bulk of it.!

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Over the years, Marcos' hand was strengthened by the support of countries around him including the only one that counts as in the United States of America including the colleges as Berkley found inside of it. After declaring martial law in 1972. Alot of the Communists who were active were identified and neutralized by the authority of Marcos and the aid of U.S. counter intelligence agents in the country. NPA communists and Oppositionists came back after Marcos was illegaly ousted in 1986 !

  • I agree In 1983, opposition leader Benigno Aquino Jr. was assassinated & funded by his own Family Members at the Manila International Airport. There is no available evidence to suggests that Imelda Marcos and General Fabian C. Ver planned the killing, but it is possible others out of the country had Aquino killed.This caused popular dissatisfaction with Marcos' rule as NPA and Communists/Oppsotionists wanted to pilfer the publics wealth, leading 2 widespread protests against Marcos Philippines

  • I agree Big Joe putting the wealthy and rich and competent in charge of Philippines will get it back to the top, especially if they got the connections globally. that their may be the chief contributor to the whole failed system since Marcos's illegal ousting in 1986 !

  • Comment removed

  • 1935 constitution Art 7 Sec 10.2 clearly states "In case of invasion, insurrection, or rebellion or imminent danger thereof, when the public safety requires it, he may suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, or place the Philippines or any part thereof under Martial Law" So tell me... who invaded the Philippines hmm? The people? The only reason he claimed Martial Law was because of the MNLF issue along with the other rebels then. But were they in Manila then?

  • @bigjoe777 Martial Law can be done regionally, provincially, or nationally, depending on the situation at stake. With the Rebels centered around areas AWAY from the capital... he could have had those areas under Martial Law. And Besides the only reason he installed martial law was so that the constant bickering of his critics, the demoralization of his troops, and the idea of a Superficial Military Policing state ensures him a sense of so called security. He just didn't know the adverse effects.

  • @bigjoe777 From then on during Martial Law, 2 factions sprung up... the people that sided with his regime and those that were against him. Mostly critics and sympathizers to democracy were usually the targets of house arrest. Martial Law stopped the demoralization of his troops since, they were no longer stationed to fight the rebels... they were stationed for more policing efforts in heavily congested areas in the Philippines. Despotism, Nepotism, & Monopoly. These reigned heavily under himthen

  • @bigjoe777

    As always either you twist the facts, omit part of it or simply have a poor reading skills.

    I guess your puppet master failed to mentions the following: riots; storming of Malacanang(1st quater storm); Pope Paul VI assassination attempt; rebellion and bombings.

    Does Art. 7 Sec. 10.2 stated "ONLY" through an "INVASION" a president can declare a Martial Law?

    Stop insulting your self. #LOL

    Your gibber won't win you any sensible debate.

  • @bigjoe777 "I guess your puppet master failed to mentions the following: riots; storming of Malacanang(1st quater storm); Pope Paul VI assassination attempt; rebellion and bombings" Your insight on these matters sound more like deliberate questions more than actual occurrences. Riots? Storming of the Mal.? Pope Paul VI? Rebel operations? You're seriously not being specific on these matters. These can be either national to world events? Mal. storming? Yes, how is it a conspiracy? explain it :D

  • if Marcos is a mad man then bigjoe your a mad monkey

    Marcos will not be the president as early as 1965 if he is does not posses the

    qualification and caliber set to be a leader

    for instance back in the old days citizens choose

    leaders in Pinas based on their qualifications not like today

  • by their acting or singing capability.

    And by the way a mad man doens score top scores at his college

    for written and oral examinations

    Jesus Christ when will you all wake up and realize the mistakes of the past!

  • BIGJOE I THINK YOU NEED TO KNOW THAT IF MARCOS WAS SHOT AT THE MARINES WOULD DEFEND THE PRESIDENT, THE ARMY IS POLITICAL THEY DONT KNOW WHO THEY WILL BACK, THAT IS WHY NOT ALL ARMY WAS DEFECTED TO THE TRAITORS ENRILE & RAMOS, BOTH PHILIPPINE MARINE BAT. ARE STILL LOYAL TO MARCOS IF MARCOS ORDERED THE SHOOTING NOT ONLY WOULD HAVE MARCOS REGAIN PHILIPINES AND PUT BACK TO MARTIAL LAW BUT THE U.S. GOVT WOULD HAVE ATTACKED THE CROWD TOO TO MAKE SURE MARCOS IS STILL IN POWER AND NOT BRING HIM 2 HAWAII

  • HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLO !!!!!!!!!!!!! OUT THERE !!!

  • @zeppaify WOW BIG SHOT SI BIGJOE NAMAN, SHE ACTS IF LIKE SHE HAS SEEN EVERYTHING, MARCOS IF HE ORDERED THE SHOOTINGS TO THE 2 BATTALIONS

  • OF PHILIPPINE MARINES STILL IN HIS POWER WOULD HAVE ENDED THE DEMON-STRATORS DAYS, AND THIS IDIOTS FORGETS THAT ENRILE AND RAMOS DIDNT DEFECT TO AQUINO THEY ACTUALLY ARE THE ONES WHO STARTED EDSA IF YOU ARE A REAL FILIPINO THEN YOU WOULD KNOW YOUR HISOTRY AND TIME LINE IGNORAMOUS

  • Comment removed

  • Dr. Werner Von Braun's WAS THE HEAD OR TOP MAN FOR THE U.S. NASA, ROCKET, AND JET ENGINE THE FATHER OF AMERICAN HIGHTECHNOLOGY, WHEN HE WAS DONE OR WHEN YOUR COUNTRY FELT HE WAS DONE....IT WAS TIME TO PULL A STEVE JOBS ON HIM BECAUSE THEY DIDNT NEED HIM GOING ELSE WHERE HELPING ANYONE

  • ENRILE & RAMOS START EDSA, AND WHERE WAS CORY?SHE WAS IN CEBU SHE TOOK A FLIGHT BACK SO SHE COULD TAKE PART IN THE FESTIVITIES OF THE ILLEGAL OUSTING OF MARCOS NOW YOUR TIMELINE KNOW YOUR CHRNONOLOGICAL AND LOGICAL ORDER AFTER THAT RAMOS AND ENRILE TRIED SO MANY TIMES TO DE THROWN HER SO THEY CAN BE IN POWER THEMSLEVES !

  • @zeppaify WHY DO YOU TYPE IN UPPER CASE ARE YOU SHOUTING IF YOU ARE I WILL TYPE IN UPPER CASE ALSO TO GET MY POINT ACROSS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @zeppaify I WENT TO SEE THE CAUSE OF DEATH FOR DR. WERNER VON BRAUN AND STEVE JOB'S THEY BOTH DIED BEFORE THEY HIT THEIR LATE 60'S INTERESTING !!

  • ELSE, STEVE JOBS IS THE INVENTOR OF THE MOBILE GPS TRACKING DEVISE THAT HUMANS CHOOSE TO HAVE ON THEIR PERSONS, NOT THE OTHER WHERE IT IS SURGICALLY PUT IN YOUR SKIN, THE GOVT. WANTS CONTROL OF HIS COMPANY AS WELL AS MICROSOFT DO YOU DOUBT THAT

  • GO ASK BILL G. WHY HE DOESNT WORK ANYMORE INSTEAD HAS A FOUNDATION THAT HE WORKS ON DAY IN DAY OUT TRYING TO GIVE HIS GOVT. MONEY AWAY IN DESPITE OF WHERE HE REALLY WANTS TO BE "AS CEO OF MICROSOFT TODAY" BUT HE PLAYED BALL AND WAS SPARED NOT STEVE OH NO NOT GOOD OLD STEVE~!

  • @bigjoe777 BIGJOE, DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT THE U.S. DIDNT MEDAL OR HAVE A SAY SO IN WHO OUR LEADERS ARE OR WHO WE CHOOSE TO BE OUR LEADERS, YOU LIVE IN AMERICA, AND DO YOU REALLY THINK MARCOS CAN BE VIABLE OR BE STRONG WITHOUT THE HELP OF THE UNITED

  • STATES BACKING HIM FOR 21YRS THEY EVEN PUT HIM TO HAWAII WITH INTENTIONS TO REINSTALL HIM INTO POWER, FREEDOM IS A ONLY GOOD IF YOU HAVE MONEY TO BACK IT UP WHEN YOU ARE POOR OR TRYING FOR DEMOCRACY ITS ABOUT MONEY FREEDOMS COME AFTERWARD

  • AS A BLACK PERSON IN AMERICA MAYBE THEY WILL EVEN TELL YOU THAT THEY ARE STILL FIGHTING FOR IT. ALSO I WOULD LIKE TO TELL YOU SOMETHING APPLE STEVE JOBS WAS ASSASSINATED SLOWLY BY YOUR GOVT. WHAT HE DIED OFF THEN GO LOOK AT THE CASUE OF DEATH OF DR. WARREN VON BRAUN THANKS FOR

  • @zeppaify MARCOS SURE WAS HARD CORE HE WOULD BE MY PICK TO RULE PHILIPPINES MAYBE WE WOULD HAVE BEEN SAVED BY HIS GENIUS AND AMERICAN MONEY, TOO BAD THE COMMUNISTS AND OPPOSITIOISTS ILLEGALLY OUSTED HIM....I LIKE MARCOS MORE THAN THE AQUINOS WHO HAD NO REAL TALENT EXCEPT WITH KRIS AQUINO

  • Bigjoe, if you make yourself aware of what is out their you will inturn be practical in your choosing or views of a leader such as Marcos as in my self my understanding of the world is much more diverse and indepth. In this case choosing a practical leader as my choice explains the opinions and reasons why for me Marcos was the best choice since 1965, when you allow yourself to know all the worst case scenarios that can arise your best bet is to stay in the middle & for me that is Marcos era!

  • MARRYING SO CALLED CHINESE OR INCHIK LOOKING CHINESE SPEAKING SLANTED EYES WHO CALL THEMSELVES FILIPINO..THEY SURE DID FOOL MANY INTO BELIEVING THEIR FAKE FREEDOM PROMISES NOW LOOK AT US POORER THAN MARCOS TIMES !

  • ipamigay naman yung mga kayamanan ninyo sa mga naghihirap na halos walang makain, mamatay kayo d rin nyo madala sa libingan,lol

  • @bigjoe777 Imelda might have her mistakes, extravagant to be one of them but I also believe with her own wealth so in that case I am bias just to let you know and that she is also allowed to spend her own monies then to the tune of her own wind, now concerning that she has done less during her seat, I disagree In her office more got done and more things done

  • big joe- realistically there is no corrupt free govt. even the u.s.a. is not error free it is guilty of corruption itself maybe even corruption on a global level if you ask countries not friendly to the

  • u.s.a., pracitally all govt. are corrupt, what you need to make yourself aware of is this, govt. are corrupt so that they can catapult their country on the same level as countries that are doing the same as them, the ultimate disagreement between 2 or more countries can result in war, in war there is rules but we all know its a fight to win cheating included !

  • pera yan ng pinas! heheh joke

  • Big joe- I'd also like to add, if you want the Philippines to move fwd just as I do, put the people who poses the money to pay the debts off and also have the influence, connections &power and wealth to get us (philippines) out of its rut! infact I also want to see jet fighter aircraft back in the Philippine Air Force inventory so that we can defend and patrol the borders of the Philippines just as japan, china, and south korea, and singapore and malaysia &indonesia do as in the time of Marcos!

  • @bigjoe777 Off course not that is correct, when are you talking about, read your comment, what are you referring too? again it is corruption lets examine. Corruption is yet another colorful discriptive default word used by the Opposition

  • , Any thing man made is corruptable: lets 1st establish that, okay now that I have laid the foundation, I will teach, if anything man made is corruptable then religion, business, laws, economics and even politics is corruptable since it is man made knowing this it is easy to say "oh he should of

  • or should of have or this or that!" Then again people can fold or fall to your own delusions of govt and politics I here on youtube strive to keep everything in perspective and NOT REALISTIC but practical key word Practical, if your or we are speaking about a Politicians shouldnt we be practical since we are speaking

  • of a person who is human and can make mistakes or decisions that you and I cannot agree on some or even most times. So practically Marcos is the best since 1965, is a true statement, infact if you look at it economically he kept Pinas ranked no.3 in asia even thou the opposition says that

  • the economy of Philippines slip so on should they also inform you that all economies in the region during the 1970's oil and economic embargo's took effect all over the world but the Media so much anti-Marcos would only pick and choose the words and news to derail or make Marcos look bad, again if you are educated you can do your own

  • Not all decenede on edsa86 to join in the ppl power movement, many are just wathching what is going on and the media is fueling the movement, most filipinos before dont even know why they are out on the streets, its as thou the media is being coached by the opposition before, that is why in my opinion it would

  • be twice as dangerous today because of multi-media and if you want to talk about control the U.S. govt. owns all the satelites in orbit that it uses and can turn them off in case this happens inside U.S. so neuatralize any people power protest and the U.S. has very good to great riot control police, what happened

  • in the Philippines was mistake not a change for the better or freedom when infact the Philippines economy became even worse and the freedom of speech didnt change anything we are still waitign for another Marcos to lead by Iron Fist once again and get this country back on its feet to add more jobs employment so that people can eat !

  • @bigjoe777 Idoicy, in countries that are far advanced such as the United States you dont think they are controlling you or even watching you even closer, your delima is that you believe that Marcos was a bad leader heightened by the medias propaganda, & sought to describe him that way when

  • a key journalist turned senator wanted to run for his seat, off course the U.S. will not allow an Aquino to hold office seat especially when his father was arrested by the allied forces during WW2 for spying for the Japon, and soon after Benigno found to be a communist sympathizer and consipiring with the NPA

  • to over throw the Sworn in govt. of that time, do you really think that the u.s. will support anyother leader to lead Philippines from 1965 to 2011 if not a Marcos who up held the Philippine Soil by going out there and dawning the Philippine Army Uniform to be a real Freedom fighter to fight the Japon off Filipino

  • soil, heck if you believe in socialism then by God your views are hindered and we will never see eye to eye, in this case you can use any supporting accusations that the media use agains the Marcos's after 1970's But we all know that prior to that Marcos is being hailed on and off the television screen, in those times most clips on t.v. you will see are in Black &

  • White prior to when that Pig Journalist Benigno mounted and decided to run for Marcos's seat, even I can tell that and it is very simple, my understanding is this even thou the Americans gave us freedom or so called independence it is very much controlled again see a word you've come to endeer, but reality is every thing is controlled

  • DUDE... HE RULED THE PHILIPPINES CLOSELY ENOUGH LIKE HOW COMMUNISTS CONTROL CHINA!!! although I am quite a belligerent believer in socialism, I however do not accept the idea that people should follow and give everything towards the state that's controlled by a mad dictator! For what reason then did our heroes fight for freedom if we are to return into the grasp of dynastic mediocrity under an iron hand that we call government? Shame on you for calling yourself a Filipino.

  • buy and thats a very big BUT, in the case of Marcos he was a great leader because not only was he able to let Americans dictate to him, he also tested them and believe me Marcos was a great negotiator one that you would want to have to go toe to toe against smart White Americans at that time. He was a genius especially in politics and economics. Nothing seen in times after him another reason why Philippines continues to fall behind economically even now below the rising Vietnamese economy !!

  • @syzygy588 Dude, although I agree that he was a natural lawyer and a charismatic manipulator, still I cannot applaud for a man whose own ambitions dictate and inconvenience the lives of many under his delusion of grandeur and power. Instead, he should've focuses all that brain of his into creating a corrupt-free political system and to help eliminate the country's economical problems in the years to come... Now that's a man I'd like to know. By the way... do you know any? Of course not!

  • research at the time and figure out that these accusations were untrue and lies, the Govt. of the United States would not back a person for 21yrs if he was a communist or noticed that he was ruining a country that had the 2 biggest military bases on its soil, Marcos was a outstanding Leader the best in my opinion since again 1965 on up till today. and yes off course Not everyone has flaws! look at the rookie leaders who sat in office after Marcos need I say more.

  • @syzygy588 I agree, I applaud the people who have fought against power monopoly... but I do not applaud the movement for being fanatical with a woman who has done so less during her seat in office? The reason as well as to why the Aquinos fought against the Marcoses was because of land... the Hacienda Louisita when Marcos announce the land distribution system. I did my full research in that event which links the Aquinos so called opposition to the regime. The Aquinos are no different from them.

  • Philippines can sequester any lands it wants, thus stating this shall also render any monies for the fair price of the land, to the owners. This means that the owners will be given money for the property but is and can be acquired easily by the Govt.

  • @bigjoe777 @bigjoe777 as we all know, the govt. and happen as it may be that the Marcos's were in power, has the authority (the Govt.) has the authority to acquire the land, the reasons may vary or may be officially written in many ways but in the end the Govt. of the country can sequester any lands thus providing the owners fair price of the land and can acquire the this land at a minimal time especially in times of war or distress. The govt. in the end can do this without question articulated!

  • @syzygy588 Jesus himself is practical he knew that humans are sinful and so he died for our sins, he was practical, he knew that humans can make mistakes but if you already factor that in then you can deal and get to the business of moving forward. thats why I like Marcos he was not only a great leader but a pracitcal and Philippine 1st in his actions and thoughts and vision !! Marcos Marcos Marcos Again !!

  • astetically (visually) are more evident, common Imelda is known for things you can see just look at this video, what needs to happen is a relaxed scrutunity of her own bank accounts if this is done and she has free reign not only will the inection of monies be felt in Philippines but help out around the world as well, What do you think about that.....

  • @syzygy588 oh really? Since when? I've already checked her so called projects... And this means more dividends to be subjected to the government when the project is done... so in other words, insta-profit for every project she owns. I dunno where you grew up, but from where i'm from, charity here means conditions.

  • @bigjoe777 I think you need to re investigate politics or economics properly, as if you live in a fairy tale land, think in practicaity, the only thing that is honest is religion and sometimes that has questions, so if you think politics is honest please put your research in religion not politics, in a world where poltiicians work with the wealthiest and strongest and most influencial that means their will always be conditions once you make yourself know to these you can understand clearly life!

  • @zeppaify no my friend... Politics and Economics... they are all clean... The ones that are dirty are the people that attend to them. There is no such thing as a clean slate... this I agree. But to think that we'd lose our own humanity for personal gain is more evident that man is slowly turning into something degrading. I can't blame the wealthy and the businessmen for using downhanded ways of getting things done, I blame the people that let them. All the more the people that share their views.

  • @bigjoe777 Politics & Economics is the Framework, but what makes them what they are, Are the people, for example before politics and economics their is religion, the 1st form of poltics & law, As I said earlier since humans corrupt and humans made up Religion, Politics, Economics & law, etc. etc. etc. than these all can be corruptable. Dont blame the people that let them, then you yourself are guilty, do what all people that live on earth do, be pracitcal, I believe Jesus is the same way Noh!

  • @zeppaify dude, it's good to believe in what we believe in, but to do nothing at all and watch as the chaos unfolds makes us more enough responsible for not doing anything about it. Although we may have different views and opinions on matters, talking about them and not doing anything about it is what makes us no different from the people that claim goodness prevails all without even a single action done. Of course people, as you said, are corruptable. But that doesn't mean they're static in it.

  • @bigjoe777 some people are not corruptable that is true, in that case alot of world leaders are assassinated, this is at a higher level of status, let me tone it dwn 2maybe a Private Business CEO or Chairman, what they do is kidnap his daughter, kids, wife etc. if he doesnt comply. But the ones doing it are not business they are crime organized so what happens is that they get that rich individual to comply. The world works in very strategic and corrupt ways. Thats why I like practical leaders

  • @zeppaify Practical leaders? Where? Noy Noy? Bullshit... Cory? Uber Bullshit! Marcos?... have you lost your mind?

    Honestly, the only kind of practical leader now adays would be the ones with a gun stuck behind his back with us holding the trigger or that he'd be a total zealot to the political field, OCB leaders (obssessive compulsive behavior) if that's how I'd like them to be, forever stuck towards keeping by the books... no compromise, no alternate route, pure hard cold justice!

  • @bigjoe777 I LIKE MARCOS TOO, MARCOS IS THE ONLY PERSON THAT WILL HOLD A .45 CALIBER TO PEOPLES HEAD, BUT HE WAS DONE DOING THAT IN WW2...MARCOS IS THE BETTER CHOICE SINCE 1965

    PERIOD !!

  • @sllazzer145 then... what use did our heroes of the revolution fight for when the country they had spilled their blood for is just to be taken over by an oppresive force no less different than the old colonial power?

    A REPUBLIC MUST BE RUN WITH FREEDOM!!! NOT FORCE!!!! IF YOU WAN'T FORCE, GO TO COMMUNISM OR MONARCHY!!!

    WHAT USE IS ELECTIONS WHEN ONE MAN HOLDS THE VOTE? WHAT USE ARE HUMAN RIGHTS WHEN ONE MAN HAS A GUN BEHIND YOUR BACK? WHAT USE ARE YOUR COMMENTS WHEN ONE CONTROLS THE MEDIA?

  • THE HEALTHY EXCHANGE OF WORDS BUT LETS BE PRACTICAL YOU LIVE IN AMERICA IF YOUR PEOPLE WILL GO TO THE STREETS YOUR LOCAL AND MILITARY WILL OPEN FIRE NOT EVEN MARCOS ORDERED THE MILITARY TO FIRE ONTO THE STREETS HE WAS A KIND AND MERCIFUL LEADER. IF HE WAS EVIL HE WOULD HAVE ORDERED THE SHOOTING OF MANY INNOCENT BUY STUPID PEOPLE BUT HE NEVER DID A CLASSY AND ICONIC LEADER TILL THE VERY END.

  • @zeppaify I have been through many places in the philippines... DO NOT TALK TO ME WITH SUCH IMPUDENCE AS THOUGH YOU KNOW WHAT I'VE SEEN AND BEEN THROUGH! As to waht avail would Marcos gain if he ordered his military to open fire at EDSA when already his own troops have speculations as to whether or not they should follow him since one of his chief military pawns (Ramos & Enrile) defected to the Aquino side. And if he had ordered the firing, he'd be put to death when he'd be ousted.

  • @bigjoe777 Ramos and Enrile did not defect. Their plan of the take over was discovered. They hid in Crame and Aguinaldo. Everything was scripted. From the bombing in the early 80's, assassination of Ninoy to snap election. Reasearch 1950's Iran's coup and Mossadeq overthrow. Same premise, timetable and execution.

  • @Thudothwacker So because of this premise alone, you believe Marcos to be a true leader because of this event? So what? Many countries have their own conspiracies, just like JFK, Abraham Lincoln... Even president Magsaysay and Arroyo. Honestly, I sometimes question whether or not the Filipino that support a mad man even have a brain? The more I think about it... I wonder if general public of the nation have?

  • @bigjoe777 The main is point is you have a flawed historical grasp on the subject.

    Mossadeq plans to nationalist their oil fields against the wishes of the British. Marcos has a independent foreign policies, a national industrialisation program and we are a leading nation in South East Asia/Asia.

    After 1986 we lost everything. Our economy revert back to colonial levels: agricultural, cheap labours, exporter of raw materials and importer of finish products.

  • @Thudothwacker If this were so, then how come the economy of the Philippines couldn't cope with the trademarkets around the 70's ? GDP grew at a pace of 4.6 during the 1st fiscal year. it climbed impressively to 8 by 1976.... this would've impressed me... but at what cost? massive authoritarian corruption, despotism, nepotism, political repression, and human rights violations. The rest of that GDP went down hill. If you don't believe me... see the Stock Market records.

  • @bigjoe777 You have to remember the 70's is a very turbulent decade. Oil crisis, middle east wars and Iran hostage. Each incidents has an impact on the Philippines.

    The economic downturn was a orchestrated move by a consortium of Industralists/Bankers/CIA in connivence with the opposition then. To undermine Marcos independent economic policies.

    We became an economic colony of American-European multinational corporations after '86 (Research "neocolonism").

  • @Thudothwacker good reading you know more about Politics and Economics vs. bigjoe who basically knows only what is writte for him to come to his conclusions vs. what is really going on in the world and Philippines as in a whole, its as thou some people are only led to believe what is set fourth in front of them, when infact if you are educated you read all the information, research what is going on around you and then some and factually peice together not only what govts. do but what is grandier

  • @zeppaify Look at @bigjoe777 flip flopping

  • @Thudothwacker This kind of thing is no different from the other countries including the US. You think everyone is out to get the Philippines? Bullshit. You don't even know the grand scheme of things. Everything, from what you claim is a conspiracy is more greater than that. And your so called Marcos is a pawn in all this. Including the president of the US! Because of this blunder we call democracy, we hardly even stand united to even understand the gist of the matter important!

  • @bigjoe777 "Democracy", isn't that the reason why you zealots wants him out.

    He has a plan and a vision of newly industrialise Philippines through his "New society movement".

    Unfortunately some sectors of the society are pretentious(activist/rebels/fa­ux intellects) and ambitious(politicos/elites). Ready to sell the interest of the Republic as long it benefits them.

    The fact is colonialism has taken a new form after WW2. Marcos tried to resist it. But was forcibly expelled from power.

  • @Thudothwacker ""Democracy", isn't that the reason why you zealots wants him out." OF COURSE IT FUCKING IT IS!!!! THAT'S THE POINT OF DEMOCRACY IN THE FIRST PLACE?!!! YOU DON'T HOARD THE ENTIRE SEAT OF POWER TO ONE PERSON?! IF THAT WERE THE CASE, THEN IT'D BE DESPOTISM!!!! WHY BOTHER CALLING IT DEMOCRACY WHEN ONLY ONE MAN HAS THE ONLY SAY IN THE MATTER?

    Honestly, although I approve of the idea of improving our country, I wouldn't do it in the expense of the PEOPLE AND THE NATION!!!

  • @bigjoe777 PART 1

    "Because of this blunder we call democracy" -bigjoe777

    Aren't those your words? LOL

    Do really believe we have a democracy prior to Marcos?

    When the wealth of the land belongs to a few. While the masses are left to fend themselves.

    Every successful nations started from autocratic to democratic phase gradually. As a society became more affluent. So does the application of democratic principle. Example Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia and Singapore to name a few.

  • @Thudothwacker Yes those are my words (unless you have difficulty understanding) And yes, democracy is in itself a blunder as well much as a liberal government system. so how can one call it a Democratic government when the "Liberal" part has been censored and or tampered with? Had he really been the smart man that you claim he is, he'd try his best to implement economic reforms to consolidate and make compromise the agricultural and industrial sectors to lessen revolts and increase statisfction

  • @bigjoe777 You do realised that you're contradicting yourself. LOL!

    Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore were once a police states. Free from the bickering, grandstanding and lobbying usually found in a democratic system.

    Their leaders were able to map their future and accomplished.

    For a democracy to succeed. Progress "MUST" be in place first.

    What is freedom? When people are at the mercy of the few(oligarchies/politicos).

    PS. try using mind mapping to help you organise your thoughts.

  • @Thudothwacker "Because of this blunder we call democracy" - democracy, because of it's liberalism is in itself an unstable form of government when left unchecked and unsupervised. Never the less. the government we have is democratic and thus must remain democratic until congress agrees to change the government. How am I contradicting myself exactly? I'm quite particular about systematic flows and correspondence vis-à-vis on these matters. To disturb this flow without regulation is unlawful.

  • @bigjoe777 what Marcos had done is unlawfully take and overstep government protocols under the guise of Martial Law.

    Because of the limitations of Youtube, i've taken into mind writing down a minimal segment of my otherwise epic-long speeches of my opinions on this matter. Forgive me if my otherwise deliberate attempt to bring you towards my level of comprehension has rendered your understanding of my message on the matter of "democracy" rather... contradictory.

  • @bigjoe777 Under the 1935 constitution Art 7 Sec 10.2

    "President may place the Philippines under Martial Law"

    What constitution are you talking about?

    There are no perfect government. Each have it's share of plus and minus. Democracy has it flaws too: lobbying, politicking, loop holes, etc..

    Save your effort. Comprehension isn't the problem here. It's you and your flawed facts and logic. No need for an epic-long winded essay. The outcome is still the same. Corrupted and baseless.

  • @bigjoe777 What?! Running out of points to rebut, my "PRETENTIOUS" counterpart? Thus resorting to requoting. LOL

    Face it you had been SERVED. Hit the books or keep your absurdity to yourself.

    And PLEASE spare others from your asininity.

    BTW thanks for the laugh!

  • @Thudothwacker ..."Face it you had been SERVED" How is it that I got served with you never explained much these matters? Honestly. Let us deduce these matters of yours if you're unwilling to share. You pointed out the Malacanang storming. In 1970, students in Manila mobilized enormous numbers of people to attend protests against U.S. imperialism and the "rise of fascism" under Marcos. The protests later became known as the First Quarter Storm. Is this your conspiracy? explain this & the rest.

  • @bigjoe777 What are things to explain? Those are the events preceding to the imposition of Martial Law.

    If anyone who needs explaining is you. Where did you get this asinine notion?

    "Martial Law stopped the demoralization of his troops since

    they were no longer stationed to fight the rebels" -bigjoe777 Did Art. 7 Sec. 10.2 stated "ONLY" an "INVASION" can Martial Law be declared?

    Answer and stop diverting.

  • @Thudothwacker "bigjoe777 Did Art. 7 Sec. 10.2 stated "ONLY" an "INVASION" can Martial Law be declared? Answer and stop diverting."

    I mentioned this "Sarcasm was intended there. but seeing as you saw that in a different sense, I can probably understand well now how I can lower my level to yours."

    So I mentioned invasion. intended to mix it well with the idea that Martial Law was made Nation wide so as to befit the reason of Martial Law instated. Sarcasm was applied but wrongly understood.

  • @bigjoe777 "Martial Law was made Nation wide so as to befit the reason of Martial Law instated"

    Let me clarrify (youtube's comment limit is making this difficult to type in limited words) Martial Law was made nationwide so as to befit the idea that there is an "invasion" (an unexpected attack from a foreign foe) but is more or less likely the people speaking up. The implementation of Martial Law has forced order in a country whose rebels were regionally away from the capital.

  • @bigjoe777 So is that how you defend your position? "Sarcasm"

    I am a little bit frustrated from your hideous lame excuse.

    I was expecting more from a intelligencia(faux) to enlighten "ME".

    Allow me to explain to you my highly esteem collegue that

    "Insurrection" and "Invasion" are "NOT" synonymous with one another.

    Voicing out grievances and calling for an overthrow are two different actions.

    Seriously, what part of martial law speech that "invasion" was the reason for the declaration?

  • @Thudothwacker "intelligencia(faux)" Now that's just downright deceptive. So you want me to lie to convince you? two evils don't make a right. (least I become the same evil)

    PS. i wish I never brought up this invasion thing for you since we're deliberately sticking to this and not the actual topic at hand.

    "So is that how you defend your position? "Sarcasm"

    You may think it not so (depending on your level of comprehension.) then consider it a slip of the tongue or a deliberate attempt to

  • @bigjoe777 stress out the situation of Martial Law (after checking out my last message I kind of understand now why you keep bringing up this invasion thing... I forgot to include civil unrest, military coup' d' ta, after the Invasion thing. Damn youtube once again for the word limit. I removed the words off along with another longer sentence on this same thought). My bad on the misunderstanding. unless of course you're going to make another fit based on this again. : I

  • @bigjoe777 For someone with an unrepenting knowledge. Composing a clear concise message within limits. Is an easy task. So........why can't you?

    Yes blame YouTube. LOL!!

    '"invasion" (an unexpected attack from a foreign foe)' -bigjoe777

    With such conviction. No way you can twist that around.

    "downright deceptive" -bigjoe777

    That's "sarcasm 101" for you.

  • @Thudothwacker "For someone with an unrepenting knowledge" Foremost, I didn't state in anyway that I am knowledgeable in everything (such a thing is ludicrously impossible for humans) all the more "Composing a clear concise message within limits. Is an easy task" when you don't have to entail detail into your messages. Such of the matters I'm discussing is quite tedious especially when generalizing the matter just creats a misunderstanding.