Lyndon LaRouche, supporter of centralized banking?

[2634Bets]

I recently started reading LaRouche material and noticed straight away the very things you point out in your vid - White male bashing, especially of the Founders is rife within his writings but what can one expect when he has surrounded himself with veiled marxist Jews. LaRouche gives some truths but uses it as bait to lead the unsteady away from the right path. He's a paid shill plain and simple.

[MetalHeadViking]

Great vid man!

[kingneddy]

can i ask,who would you recommend ?i was told this about larouche & thats how i found this vid.

[hellsunicorn]

@kingneddy If you're going in anti-FED directions, G. Edward Griffin and a few other members of the John Birch Society have been the most consistent on economics, though if you tend more towards leftist politics, they'll probably turn you off. I used to be a Pat Buchanan supporter until I fully understood the problems with Nixon's further modification of the already existing currency problem. The best thing to do is read thoroughly and look for things that you might not like.

[kingneddy]

@hellsunicorn thanks.ye i love g edward griffin. the john birch society...wasnt larry p mcdonald the man murdered on flight 007? my fav researcher right now is bill cooper.he says pat buchanan is a member of the mystery schools(masonry) & a socialist.

ps..im not right or left wing. im in d middle :)

[phospholipasec]

This quote actually seems to be illegitimate after searching the biography on google books. Goes to show you that there's a lot of disinfo and slandering going about regarding Hamilton. All claims of him being an undermining or subversive element to united states sovereignty need to be substantiated. good luck. For now, I can only say that I doubt the "founder of the central bank" (the United States Bank) had in mind a model then that was similar to the central banks operating today.

[hellsunicorn]

@phospholipasec I don't require any slanderous quotes about Hamilton being a Rothschild spook to tell me that the kind of banking system that he supports and his approach to deficit spending breed corruption, or that Hamilton was a mad imperialist who was willing to conquer a good portion of South America in the name of heading off a fictitious foe in the French. There is plenty of stuff that came straight out of Hamilton's mouth that puts me at odds with him.

[phospholipasec]

“Alexander Hamilton married into the Rothschild family December 14, 1780, Alexander Hamilton was born Alexander Levine, of Jewish lineage, in St. Croix, the West Indies. After changing his name and his geographical situs, he married Elizabeth Schuyler.. [The Intimate Life of Alexander Hamilton, by Allan Hamilton 1910]

[AnonymousWhitePerson]

The fundamental source of all your errors, sophisms, and false reasonings, is a total ignorance of the natural rights of mankind!

Were you once to become acquainted with these, you could never entertain a thought, that all men are not, by nature, entitled to a parity of privileges.

[AnonymousWhitePerson]

Aaron Burr was a British agent.

[phospholipasec]

to understand that he is not only trying to help people, but he is trying to work with the Ruling class... read: "the secrets of the inner elites" by LaRouche on the web. It's crazy but it may be our ticket to a glimpse of the inside.

My point: LaRouche is on the inside. He is apart of the French Grand Lodge; a supportive of Rome Not a support of Jesuits (though he'd never say that aloud). He is a gate keeper; but that's how it must be. Man, myth, ruling class, and benevolence in harmony.

[hellsunicorn]

@phospholipasec Here is my principle problem with what you are putting forth. While I don't necessarily share the idea of fully destroying class (this is a communist idea), I have no allegiance with Rome. I have often wondered whether the Roman Curia and the Jesuits were at war with each other, but even if they are, the enemy of my enemy is not neccesarily my friend. And central banking is not something that I'm prepared to support.

[phospholipasec]

LaRouche is likely apart of the french Grand Masonic Lodge. He is supportive of the vatican (not likely the Jesuits, though he'd never say that). If you read his article "the secrets of the inner-elites", you'll see he advocates definitely an oligarchic republic of some form. He knows you can't dislodge the ruling class. But he knows likewise that among the rulers and the evil ones, there are wise and benevolent men that are "humanistic" as he would say.

[phospholipasec]

Have you ever thought that LaRouche is just playing the political game? You can't just remove the ruling class. He is talking about re-arranging the banking industry to make it more just and protective of the people. He may be in favor of "central banks", but he wants to impose restrictions on it and protect people from the burden of speculation. LaRouche also is supportive of the vatican.

Isn't it possible he's trying to devise a system of compromise where in the people are more protected?

[AnonymousWhitePerson]

Once the Bank expired in 1812, the Financial Oligarchy of Great Britain declared War on the United States in order to get the United States into Debt and leverage it through Debt.

During the 19th century, 80% of the world's commerce was carried on British vessels controlled by the CROWN, the Corporation of London (City of London).

Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is now held by the CROWN (City of London Banks). The Crown is the International Monetary Fund.

[AnonymousWhitePerson]

The 1st and 2nd Bank of the United States was the nation's 1st and 2nd National Banks, perhaps the most sucessful bank in history.

Drafted first in 1792, Hamilton's Bank aided the US in paying for the Revolutionary War. The premise of the War of 1812 was for the Financial Oligarchy of London to get the United States into Debt and leverage it through Debt.

Once the bank's charter expired, James Madison, the Architect of the Constitution Renewed it in 1816 so as to pay for the War of 1812.

[AnonymousWhitePerson]

"Hamilton was the greatest constructive mind in all our history and I shall come pretty near saying... in the history of modern statesment in any country.

-Henry Cabot Lodge."

Hamilton is really a colossus... without numbers, he is a host unto himself.

-Thomas Jefferson

[hellsunicorn]

Keep two things in mind here DS. I do not support the JP Morgan/Rockefeller cartel, so on this area we have common ground. Where we differ is that I am not going to trade one form of empire for another, which is what La Rouche wants to do.

The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend.

[DreadfulSolemnity]

Definitely, Neither do I.

But the destruction of the National Bank in 1832 is what enabled JP Morgan/Rockefeller to control and buy up the goverment, and turn it into their personal Empire. 5 years later in 1837, the United States experienced the Banking Panic of 1837.

[DreadfulSolemnity]

Jefferson wanted to retain the United States as a rural bucolic Feudal Utopia, a Slave-Holder's Paradise.

[hellsunicorn]

Jefferson was a deist, frankly that sort of nonsense doesn't surprise me from him, or from Thomas Paine for that matter. Patrick Henry is my preferred founder, although genetically I am closer in lineage to the Carroll family, who were unfortunately tied in with the Jesuits.

[DreadfulSolemnity]

Alexander Hamilton was born in the Caribbean and his mother was probably part Jewish. Your comment about AIPAC reminded me of that. He was one of the earliest and strongest advocates for the full emancipation of slaves, co-founding the first abolitionist party.

[hellsunicorn]

And the Scottish Presbyterian Church was supporting the same thing long before, unfortunately for Hamilton he was too in love with centralized power to be consistent in his adherence to the Calvinist roots that founded the American revolution. God has no mercy for tyrants, even if they do some moral good by their fellow man alongside their ill ways.

[DreadfulSolemnity]

You may dislike Alexander Hamilton but the Rockefellers boastfully hold Aaron Burr's treasonous pistols that killed Hamilton on display in the executive Conference Room of JP Morgan Chase, symbolizing the death of his National Bank and its replacement by their Federal Reserve JP Morgan Cartel.

[hellsunicorn]

I'm not friend of the Rockefeller clan, but I am definitely a strong detractor of Hamilton. They are all cut from the same vain as far as I'm concerned, imperialist to the core. One a misguided nationalist, the other a shady internationalist (by your testimony), both of which have subjected this nation to the oppression of fiat currency, war and corruption.

I have no interest in anything under either the Rothschild banner or the Free Mason banner.

[DreadfulSolemnity]

Aaron Burr was a British Agent.

He later fled to London where he become friends with Jeremy Bentham of the British Foreign Office.

Rockefeller family also are British agents, much like Henry Kissinger, who frequently spoke several times before Chatham House in London at the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

[DreadfulSolemnity]

The Second Report on Public Credit: Report on a National Bank by Alexander Hamilton

Otherwise, the United States would have been a weak, effete, backwards, moldering, pauperised, pitiful, deindustrialized collection of disparate States and swamps with absolutely no power, easily destroyed by the British Empire

[hellsunicorn]

Uh, that weak, effete, backwards, moldering, pauperised, pitiful, deindustrialized collection of disparate States and swamps with absolutely no power kicked the British out of this land, in much the same way that Switzerland successfully ousted tyranny from it's land through a national militia.

Burr may not have been a savory fellow, but America under Hamilton would have become an Empire much like Britain, which is what it is now. You can not seek power without it corrupting you.

[DreadfulSolemnity]

Aaron Burr was a filthy despicable Traitor, who actually tried to carve the United States into two seperate countries by detaching the Louisana Territory, and creating a "Northern Confederacy" right from the office of the Vice Presidency after killing Alexander Hamilton. Burr then wrote back to British Foreign Secretary, Anthony Merry of his plan, enlisting the aid of King George III.

The United States won the Revolutionary War with the help of France, through the aid of Lafayette.

[hellsunicorn]

That help was only necessitated by the treason of Benedict Arnold, furthermore, I don't I need to go into the Jesuit factor in France's involvement in the war.

Furthermore, the deists that took over at the Constitutional Convention made possible what we have now by not disallowing office holders to hold foreign titles such as knight, lord, esquire, et cetera. This paved the way to AIPAC having such a strong influence on our foreign policy.

[DreadfulSolemnity]

Do consider that the Bank of the United States was a National Bank, not a private Central Banking Cartel, which lasted in its first incarnation from 1792 until 1812, expiring until James Madison renewed it in 1816 as the Second Bank of the United States in order to Pay off the Debt for the War of 1812.

When the Bank was vetoed out of existence by Andrew Jackson in 1832 for Van Buren's Manhattan Bank, the United States immediately experienced the Banking Panic of 1837.

[DreadfulSolemnity]

Frederick Engels was an agent of the British Foreign Office who controlled Karl Marx's production of his treatise, the Communist Manifesto.

[FatLibertarian]

Lyndon Larouche is a democrat. Big government crack whore. He's odd though, and difficult to figure out. I do like some of their vids with their economist John Hoefoel. (Sp?)

[hellsunicorn]

My objections to Larouche are actually the same as my criticisms towards Friedman. He has some good ideas, but having any kind of central bank is EXTREMELY problematic. But Larouche's lavish praise of Alexander Hamilton just turned me off completely.

[chewbaca1989]

I like LaRouche, he's a statesman. I don't understand his banking policies.

[hellsunicorn]

He does have some positive qualities, but I really don't like his banking policies at all. I can't waste too much time on someone who is that much in love with Alexander Hamilton either.

[Zamolxx]

Your opinion on LaRouche is based on nothing. Have you ever listened to his webcasts? Have you ever herd his actions for the break down crisis, in order to avert a second New Dark Age. He exposed time and time again environmentalist fascist policies and deals, accusing George Soros, Prince Philip, the WIld life fund, the WTO, the anglo-dutch liberal banking financial system, Obama nazi health care reform,the plan for depopulation,the food crisis,NATO,the bailouts,and other forms of conspiracies

[Zamolxx]

The hamiltonian system is not a monetarist system. It's the only system that makes a republic sovereign , in which the people have control over their currency trough their representatives (parliament/government), unlike a central bank, that does not answer to anyone and loans money to the state, in the hamiltonian system or credit system, a bill is passed in congress, and the national bank is supervised by the treasury department.

[weirdjoei]

I'd like to see some of this as well...

[McCren]

Peña Esclusa was neutralized by Venezuelan´s Intelligence hours before the Attempted, in a house where they are celebrating a religious ceremony. Chavez in the beggining was helped by British people according to Larouche. Once he reached the presidency in venezuela he refused to become a puppet (Chavez told the story without name the british), from that moment he becomes a Dictator, "Populitst", Monster, Children Eater, etc...

[McCren]

I agree totally with you.. plus He's linked to the sect who tried to murder Jhon Paul II in Venezuela early 80's , also Ronald Reagan, all of this trough the Schiller Institute created by his wife, who was the sponsor of "Tradition, Family and Property" (TFP) a very famous conservative sect in LatinAmerica. The TFP leader in Venezuela (named Peña Esclusa) is today the extremist wing opponent to Hugo Chavez.

[hellsunicorn]

Wow, I had no idea he was backing Chavez's opposition. I'm no fan of Chavez and I have little love for the Vatican, but I had a feeling that La Rouche was tied into some shady stuff.

Can you give me some websites or book names that I can get a hold of so I can educate myself on La Rouche's activities in South America?

[weirdjoei]

Gold cannot support the current world population, and production needed, and is already hoarded by the hydra you speak of, to the point were we would be under their usurious control in the first place.

And adherence to market cycles, and all that bullshit will kill people during a financial meltdown.

Crying about big government will kill people, we need to start acting like adult human beings and stand up to bankers, and oligarchs. populous opinion kills, and this country is proof.

[weirdjoei]

What is sound money? The Gold Standard is imperialistic, it's not "fiat" money, it's who is issuing the money, and if it's the bankers, and not the government, then that's imperialism. Your argument is inherently flawed by that confusion.

Andrew Jackson tore down a national bank, and handed it directly to the financiers you wouldnt want to stick it to, and that was the heart of the empire, the same empire today, the city of London.

[hellsunicorn]

Fiat currency enables the concept of "perpetual war", credit has no end provided the illusion is maintained. Gold reserves can run out, even after the standard has been degraded as it was under Roosevelt.

People have a right to a stable currency that is worth as much yesterday as it will be tomorrow, fiat money DOES NOT accomplish this.

[hellsunicorn]

The bankers and the government are supposed to be bound by rule of law, but neither do this in practice, so putting one's sympathies in one or the other is an act of confusion.

Cutting off the head of a hydra accomplishes nothing, as another will grow back in its place. The heart of any one person to manipulate currency. Which is easier to manipulate? Gold or Paper/Credit?

[weirdjoei]

Also read Article I section 10, it serves as a restriction on states and money, the Constitution itself is Hamiltonian in the sense that the Credit is BORROWED on behalf of the Federal Government to issue currency, as stated in Article I section 8. And to Coin money, and regulate it, as well as measure, and weigh, and regulate foreign coin.

It's a credit system, not an Austrian British gold standard. Funded by the Rockefellers heavily, and even admitted to being avowed devotees to such.

[hellsunicorn]

On my profile it states that I am an anti-Federalist, ergo my principle sympathies lay with Patrick Henry, Andrew Jackson, and to a lesser extent Thomas Jefferson.

I concur with a general concept of regulated currency, but not with fiat currency, which is the essence of modern imperialism. La Rouche's idolizing of FDR further confirms an imperialistic tilt, and I'm not going to back a pseudo-imperialist agenda simply to stick it to a certain group of bankers.

[weirdjoei]

Know your history, and use common sense. Without gov't monopoly over money, it's controlled by financiers, they knew this.

It was a national bank, used to increase the wealth of the nation itself, by building infrastructure, to create a land based stronghold, against merritime power of the British Empire.

It worked during the Civil War to, with the transcontinental railroad , using Hamiltonian principles by Lincoln, and Henry C. Carey.

It's amazing how little history people actually know.

[weirdjoei]

Alexander Hamilton along with Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, Henry Knox, and others were members of the Society of Cincinnati, named after Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus, who preserved the Republic of Rome as a "dictator", then returned to his farm, which reflected is selfless service to the Republic.

This was the elite of the Revolution, who were the greatest patriots, who overstepped the bounds, to save the most impossible mission they sought to accomplish, defeating the world empire...

[Psychogenius018]

I like LaRouche because I find him entertaining they way humorously trashes the banksters but I don't trust him either. I have repeatedly asked LaRouchies why he is so enamored of Hamilton when Hamilton proposed and created a private central bank owned by the very "slimemold" banking families that he so hates. Their responses have been only to BLOCK ME. I don't understand his FDR fetish either in light of the recent books written by FDR's progeny,it seems FDR was just another bankster puppet.

[hellsunicorn]

It's tough to really trust any of the well known dissenters anymore. I'm finding myself more and more in disagreement with just about everyone out there. Everybody outside of the core-libertarian philosophy has fond memories of FDR, the same guy who put Japanese-Americans into concentration camps because of their race.

[DanielHubb360]

NO, no. When it comes to the "american system"

you have to look at it in history. It is all about national soverignty. You need to hear their arguments guy. Whatch their videos.

He was put in jail by them for 5 years.

[SonichuFan4Ever]

He was put in jail for tax and charity fraud, then pardoned by Bill Clinton.

[econogate]

Maybe you might learn something from all of these people, that they are examples of people that have shares of the bigger picture, but not entire solutions. Maybe that worldview can provide something of use to people as examples of limited or compartmentalized thinking? Also, couldn't their arguments be used to further flesh out information gleaned from any source? IN other words one could use a Chomskyian view or a Foucaultian view or a Illichian view or Larouchian view for clarifications' sake

[littleredbirdy]

Ron Paul has great ideas but he does not understand one important thing, 9/11 did not happen because of our involvement in the Middle East. Sure, that added fuel to the fire, but look up a man by the name of Sayyid Qutb.

Other than his pointing the finger at American foreign policy as the sole cause of terrorism on American soil he is brilliant.

[ybworld]

Private parties contol the gov't. Our votes do not count, therefore it is now in the best interests of the banks to propose a national central bank, controlled by the gov't because they have the formula, and can control the gov't at will. If the bailout passes in its original form, if you find pork barrel, restriction of liberties, fraud, scandal, theft, in the bailout bill, the proof will be there for you to see. If the market dives another 1000 points, you will see proof again.

[ybworld]

Larouche is a Nutbag.

[TheresNoTimeLikeNow]

This guy is full of himself and a disinformationalist DO DO your homework check out Larouch's economic proposals, he is a wise & informed man who knows his history. See Masters of the Universe & Ring of Power & Pleiadian Message 1-4 Humans seem to only research a few hundred years back & feel they know history. Start really researching our origins & why we are like we are today. For starters see Network Were in a lot of Trouble. & When will we have had Enough? Really show us where we are. PEACE

[ludachris475]

Alexander Hamilton was an American patriot.

In fact he was assassinated by a Traitor, Vice President, Aaron Burr, who led a secession of New England states and devised a plot with the British Monarchy to divide the United States into two nations composed of the Lousiana Territory and that of the landeshoheit from the Appalachians to the Atlantic.

[ArcLight105]

There is Lyndon LaRouche the economist, and the three man shooter team Lyndon LaRouche. On conspiracy theories, LaRouche needs to keep his mouth shut, but on economics, the guy is dead on.

[sheikadi]

this guy is so sad.

I wonder if he has gone to college yet.

[Ascendyourthinking]

Lastly, the congress represents the people, and the congress is also the government.

So with the shaping and organizing that Hamilton, Franklin, and others enacted against Jackson and the rest of his racist bigot grouping at the convention, a nation was born free of any Oligarchical Family influence via currency generation.

This is why google research is deserving of the abysmal IQ distinction!

[TheresNoTimeLikeNow]

Please inform me as to when the congress last in truth represented the people vs the corporations. It is known globally that the US has the best democracy that money can buy.

A bunch of compromised bought off white haired old men for the most part too old to even care about americas tomorrow they have sold us out just as the media have they stand by & r duplicit complicit inthe systematic demise of america and we its people. Hard to find anyone in politics you can trust sv 4 RON PAUL & KUCINICH

[Ascendyourthinking]

Thereisnotimelikenow

Trusting those who defy reason is not an act for those who wish surrvival for a time. The foundation for a successful outcomming, though it's not promised, flows from one realising lasting action, as opposed to spectator status, should characterize how they see themselves and respond on history's stage. So my good friend are you an actor, or is a seat in the roman colliseum your stage?

[Ascendyourthinking]

Internet research, check.

Unsubstantiated research on Hamilton, check.

No original source documentation,check.

Congratulations! You have accomplished the notable task of doing your IQ a disservice, by alerting the world of it's abysmal standing!

By the way, Hamilton did not propose central banking, he proposed national banking!

Even more damning to your botched attempt at research, is the fact it was with Hamilton's influence that we have the utterance of currency generated via the congress!

[AlienHead00481]

Who is your organisation to talk on the behalf of great men like FDR and Hamilton? If either men were alive today do you think for a second they would be alligned with the LaRouche movement; or maybe [just maybe] they would have addressed changes as it effected the national interest.

The changes and advances which have occured since world war two are numerous, in particular natural resources aren't in the abundance they once were and with a significant global popualtion increase....

[AlienHead00481]

cont.

...we sould be mindful of what we use instead of automatically defending old habits. Is it to much to ask to be mindful and not waste energy and to also attribute to the expansion of the environment for future generations?

[ludachris475]

Exactly, Alexander Hamilton proposed National Banking in contrast to the feudal Venetian Central Banking System we have today in the Federal Reserve.

[jacobins3000]

Is this a joke?

Neo-cons like Noam Chomsky are beholden to banker culture? Marx was controlled by capitalist bankers? what the fuck are you talking about?

[jakewayd]

There's nothing wrong with central banking so long as the government doesn't disallow the creation of private, competing currencies. The FBI and Secret Service illegally confiscated Liberty Dollar gold late last year. LaRouche also thinks FDR was a helluva guy, but FDR stole private citizens' gold! FDR also locked up law-abiding German-Americans and Japanese-Americans. Roosevelt, another Dutch piece of shit, was a proponent of LaRouche's oft-remarked upon British-Dutch Liberal Banking cartel.

[1samothrace77]

hellsunicorn your assumption that a central bank is negative is based on the fact that a central bank is a private entity if it were run exclusively by the government what would be your objections then. but you are right in stating that larouche is not calling for a removal of the fed as the US central bank which would make him a pariah in mainstream thinking although not factually incorrect.

[dave777blaster]

This guy has no  clue who Larouche is he certainly isn't a shill for the banking industry i can tell you that

[rarelibra]

hellsunicorn - then WHO do you trust? WHO can reverse the bullshit going on in the world right now?

[stupidtreehugger]

Instead of arguing whether the glass is half full of sewage or not MAKE YOUR LIST OF WITNESSES TO TRUTH! e.g. video.google: Greg Palast Blood for No Oil, JFK II, Agenda 21 Codex Alimentarius The Money Masters The Truth About Vaccines The Clinton Chronicles The Future of Food The Hidden Agenda Kay Griggs Noreen Gosch Naomi Klein Naomi Wolf FBI Chief Ted Gunderson John Pilger Adam Curtis John Perkins Robert Fisk The Marijuana Conspiracy Mike Ruppert Catherine Austin Fipps Lyndsey Williams

[stupidtreehugger]

Leuren Moret Peter Kawaje William Rodriquez

Noreen Gosch FEMA Concentration Camps Extermination Agency

The Great Conspiracy,Outfoxed, False Flag Operations,

Operation Gladio Operation Northwoods

Francesco Cossiga John Tailor Gatto Bob Carter Sen Inhofe Ken Robinson

Mary Tocco Dr Blaylock Dr Mercola Dr Meryl Nass

Gary Null Dr Robert C Becks, Bruce Malone Bruce Lipton John Cairn Frank Sherwin Dr Bill Haag Dr Thomas J Kindell Dr D Russel Humphries Prof Walter Veith Dr Stanley Monteith

[stupidtreehugger]

Bill Schnoebelen

Kent Hovind Fritz Schaefer, Zeitgeist, Zeitgeist Refuted, Expelled,

Theft by deception - Deciphering the Federal Income Tax,

How to Keep 100% of Your Earnings,

Press For Truth, We Were Also Killed, Alex Jones, Vatican Rule

[ibykus1981]

Wow, someone is cuckoo. Hamilton was anti-british system. This is something anyone who picked up any of the works of the founding fathers might know. Here is an amazing thought, go to the original sources and please don't be liberal, because liberals are dirty creatures, much like other defenders of free trade and other perverse behaviour. This message was brought to you by your friendly neighbour Brit.

[whoisinchargehere]

Sorry to tell ya that WE ALL are part of the problem. You can tie anyone to anything even if the thread is no thicker than a hair. But if you seriously want to see things improve stop with an us vs them mentality. Instead co-opt the thoughts/ideas of others that you like and leave the rest. Each person is operating from their own perspective (including LL) and you may not believe/trust him but put your feelings aside and listen/think/act. Dont waste time demonizing perceived enemies. Produce!

[beatbrain]

the problem is THEY created this US vs THEM mentality not people, people are generally good and do not want to cause problems and harm to others, but under these circumstances the put us under so much stress that people act out, it's normal...

They created this US vs THEM mentality since the days of the Kings & Queens... WE were the peasants and still are! they call us human resources!that's sad

Haven't you ever seen Robin Hood, he took from the rich gave to the poor, that's a good man

[whoisinchargehere]

Beatbrain-

You are right that the us/them paradigm is largely constructed (at least exaggerated) by those who want control by being the 'solution' (military, government). But our contribution to the process does nothing but feed the elite power over the masses by providing fodder to scare people. You are also right that most people are good, but Americans are currently too absorbed with self-interest (selfishness) to give a damn. And really is that more 'right' than elite self-interest?

[beatbrain]

I guess I can see where your coming from man

I think we should be informed and ready to act though

[holycrapone]

whoisinchargehere:

When you say "Americans are currently too absorbed with self-interest (selfishness) to give a damn" you must be watching too much TV. If our government disgusts you, please realize that it isn't "the people." For the most part, we're a good group of struggling, hard-working, hoping, praying, actively participating to try to resurrect our government. Who of you can say your "government" is perfect? I thought so.

[whoisinchargehere]

holycrapone

I am American, I dont have cable TV

The gov is a pack of criminals (on both sides of the aisle) who need to be brought to justice. Not all of them are aware of their complicity and many are good people trying their best. But the system is broken and although most citizens know this they are too busy being distracted by TV, football, NASCAR, both working 40+ hours to pay bills, living for the weekend, and so on. WE ALL NEED TO STOP, THINK, and ACT in the interest of ALL not the self

[allymetoo]

For any intelligent people it is evident, to quickly get the feeling , that something is going wrong with his political ideologies, for instance that fact that he elevates Roosevelt to the same Level of Liberal Achievement with Lincoln.

They like to intermix political attacks ( backed by real Information ) together with Lies.

Old Intelligence trick, which allows them to:

A) Gain a constant stream of followers and supporters

B) Observe how stupid or intelligent they are.

[LaroucheWatch]

Lyndonlarouchewatch do t blogspot do t co m

Join the cause. Free the minds

[MrDuffy81]

Was hamilton in favor of a centralized bank of the US, which could have benefitted the counrty?

I think that LaRouche is right in saying that the banks shouldn't be private, but run by the government.

Larouhe actually is telling us to follow the policy of FDR. I just spoke on the phone for 2 hours with a guy who I met tonight on YT. He worked for the LaRouche camp from 79 to 96.

LaRouche is telling his people to support Clinton; the CFR NWO power whore.

WTF!! BAD IDEA!!

[ConservativeKen]

Alexander Hamilton is NOTHING like Karl Marx.

To assert that Hamilton is a Marxist because both advocated centralized banking is like asserting that Thomas Jefferson is a communist because only communists support public schools.

I don't trust hellsunicorn because he has faulty reasoning and is too lazy to do real research.

[hellsunicorn]

Centralized Banking is the principle means of implementing the Marxist economic system. I'm not saying that Hamilton was a Marxist, I'm saying that Marx was probably influenced by Hamilton, as well as the other proponents of the British banking model.

Hamilton was an imperialistic thinker, his idea of a great nation was one that could match might of arms through economics. The only unfortunate thing is that Aaron Burr didn't shoot his traitorous ass before the Constitution was ratified.

[utek11]

you seem like a very intelligent guy. Why the corny moniker... hellsunicorn? sounds kinda cheesy bud

[Rickdeckard2020]

Thanks

Some of what LL says is quite suspicious ( advocacy of a new Breton Woods like monetary system, WTF?) but some of what he says makes sense and isnt usual MSM info, so if hes a GK(instead of wrong on some issues) he still offers some interesting info in the mix(as bait?). I examine what's said without taking it at face value(same for Chomsky), keeping in mind it could be disinfo or that important aspects might be left out (part of the truth is often more misleading than a lie)

[Rickdeckard2020]

Im not sure about LL's Breton Woods comment, Ive seen another video (Colonialism vs Nation State) that hints I might not have understood what he meant in his previous comment

[Xandufar]

The key feature of a New Bretton Woods is the reintroduction of fixed exchange rates to eliminate currency speculation. International trade would be much more stable. Crises like the Asian Monetary crisis of 1997, and the ongoing collapse of the dollar would be avoidable.

[ludachris475]

For t'is written: Karl Marx was himself a Central Banker.

Hehe.

[ludachris475]

The room where this was filmed is as dimly lit as a raunchy nightclub. Looks nice.

[ludachris475]

Karl Marx was himself a Central Banker.

[Xandufar]

This is a ridiculous critique. Equating Hamilton to Marx is preposterous, for example. This guy seems to know even less about Lyndon LaRouche than Alexander Hamilton.

[ludachris475]

Yeah, I know, right.

Sounds more like an ad hominem.

[madeconstudent]

even a completely free market banking system would need some sort of central organization.

naturally the successful ones would become bigger and work together with bigger banks.

[Psychogenius018]

Your info about LaRouche being a gatekeeper is interesting, I'll have to look into it. I must say, his praise of FDR has always made me a little nervous.

[hellsunicorn]

He was mixed up with a communist (Trotsky based) group for much of his life, which kind of draws into question his ideology, but definitely disqualifies the accusations that he's an anti-Semite. The fact that he would want to take us back to what got us into this mess in the first place is definitely gatekeeper style disinfo.

[ludachris475]

In what way was Alexander Hamilton's bank of the United States similar to the privately owned Morgan-Rothschild, Federal Reserve central banking cartel?

[hellsunicorn]

The entire concept of a central bank, regardless to who carters it, is that it is created with the intent of growing an Empire. Central banks and fiat currency are most useful to states that engage in war and expansion. The second central bank (which was exactly like Hamilton's) was used for the War of 1812, a war which Charles Carroll of Carrollton rightly opposed because it was imperialistic and in contradiction with the Libertarian ideology of Jefferson and most of the other founders.

[hellsunicorn]

If you want to get into details, the purpose of Hamilton's bank was Nationalistic rather than Internationalist in nature, but the concept of central economic planning is inherent in both systems, thus they are both essentially a cartel. What we are essentially dealing with is debating the trivial differences of a monarchy versus an oligarchy while dismissing a truly free economic system.

[jahprophet]

Wow... you really don't understand Hamilton at all. He was the father of 'national' banking, NOT centralized banking. Read his three reports to congress when he was treasury secretary especially his: Report on Manufacturers and Report on National Credit.

Hamilton was THE leading enemy of British imperial and banking policies of his time.

[hellsunicorn]

"National" and "Centralized", when it comes to banking, are two terms that mean exactly the same thing. I've read Hamilton's reports to congress and he is the equivalent of Pol Pot, who stated he was going to bring "true" communism to Cambodia rather than the tyrannical one that came to Russia. You and auftragstaktik have been cattle prodded right into the hands of your enemies by a left-wing gatekeeper.

[auftragstaktik]

Using quotation marks, self-evident assertions and trite little rhymes do not actually constitute an actual argument, Hellsunicorn. Prove it. Why does Hamilton's use of "National" in banking mean "Centralized" in the modern sense of ruling European oligarchies?

[hellsunicorn]

Although I do not believe in killing people in order to affect change unless there is no other alternative, Hamilton's death and the dismantling of his banking system by Thomas Jefferson delayed what is currently happening to this country.

[jahprophet]

That is another "self-evident" assertion. Look, this isn't an insult to you. You just really need to do some more work on Hamilton and you will probably make this discovery for yourself. If your two second google search on LaRouche demonstrates anything, it's a lack of rigor.

[hellsunicorn]

Your assumption that I haven't researched further than a google search indicates a lack or rigor and common sense. There are excerpts of his books online that I have perused, and I've done extensive research into Alexander Hamilton. I am obliged not to waste money on books written by someone who bases his ideology around someone who can be best described as a traitor to America.

[hellsunicorn]

When I say that I wouldn't waste money on his books, I'm talking about LaRouche, not Hamilton. I have a few hard copies of Hamilton's dribble, and I've found reading Immanuel Kant (A true idiot) to be more intellectually stimulating. I didn't come to sympathize with the anti-federalists because I think the label sounds cool, I do so because several aspects of the Federalist ideology were inherently totalitarian.

[anyusmoon1]

Nicely done. Many do not realize that ANTI-Federalist are the true Republicans who desired federalism not nationalism. And of course conversely the Federalists were for nationalism and not the ratified federalism we arrived at following the constititunal convention.

Hamilton was essentially a Monarchist and all but begged Washington to accept title of KING. Thank G*D Washington had strength of character(to reject Hamiltons designs). Same kind of characteristics we see in Dr. Ron Paul.

[hellsunicorn]

On a final note, Article 1 Section 8 has a good deal of useless garbage in it, particularly subsidizing science, arts and the like. It contains the poison of Statism camouflaged behind a few practical necessities of a Federal Legislative Branch. I think there is a reason why LaRouche rhymes with douche.

[hellsunicorn]

Hamilton's involvement in the structuring of the constitution is of little importance to me (I'm sympathetic to the anti-Federalists), and only furthers my view of him as a Judas figure. The problem with the National Bank IS it's structure, so his alleged hatred of the European variety is akin to disliking the way someone else constructs a medieval torture device.

[auftragstaktik]

Remember: It was Hamilton (in large part) who gave you the Constitution of the United States, which gives us the power to buck these ruling oligarchies, in the first place. Who do you think thought up Article I, Section 8? (Yep, that's right ...)

[auftragstaktik]

Though his national-bank may have shared structural similarities with it's so-called European counter-parts, it represented a fundamental and decisive break IN SPIRIT & FUNCTION with other forms of privately controlled central-banking.

[auftragstaktik]

You are mistaken in dismissing Hamilton (and LaRouche by simple association). Remember, Hamilton spent his childhood years growing up on the backward ass-crack of the British Colonial Empire (West Indies); he saw the worst of what imperial financial & trade policies had to offer ... And he HATED it.

[hellsunicorn]

I know little of Tarpley's economic theories, but if he ran on the Larouche ideology, I'd be interested in hearing about his views on the Federal Reserve Bank, Fiat Currency, and the like. The 9/11 stuff is pretty solid, but if he isn't opposing the banking cartels connected in all of this, he is either unaware or himself peddling half-truths.

[logosfabula]

Hi hellsunicorn, I first heard bout Larouche after Webster Tarpley, having been the latter a member of his journal of international economics. What's your opinion about him?