Added: 3 years ago
From: ciaranmv
Views: 56,238
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (235)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What a bunch of babies.

    The movie was the weakest of the lot but it was still a good time.

  • longest 5 seconds of my life

  • I don't get the criticisms about the fridge scene. I thought that was the most original clever unexpected part of the movie!

    The CGI ants really annoyed me. Their group behavior was unbearably unconvincing.

  • hahaha.... WHAT LOL?

  • They should have used Indy's age as a plot point but failed to.

    Instead, they pretend he was still 42.

  • @gukonni No they didn't. His age was a subject that was brought up quite a few times.

  • The most glaring problem in this film was pretending that Indy was still 42 and not 62. They thought they could pull it off. They thought that maybe if they added the fridge scene and the monkey scene and the other ones that they could increase our tolerance level for suspension of disbelief, but it backfired on them.

  • Maybe it should've been about some Nazi's trying to resurrect Hitler or something with the fruit from The Garden of Eden or the Blood of Lazarus or something like that or Indy trying to fight off an invasion after finding Atlantis or something (even though Atlantis has been done)

  • The nuke thing wasn't that bad IMO. But why the focus on those damn CG gophers? They kept showing them in the intro like what the hell? Mutts was kinda meh as well. Wish they did this like 10 years ago so Ford was a bit more spry for the role. And the alien thing was a bit weird since all of the other movies focused on religious/mystical stuff

  • 0:24 "my eyes! they burn!!"

  • I liked Crystal Skull, but "This is intolerable!" is friggin' hilarious.

  • lol temple of doom didnt have nazis and these movies were never meant for kids hence the 14A/PG13 rating ...duh its a fucking fictional movie based of the serials of the 1930-50's. Crystal Skullss HAD to be set in the 50's given Ford's and thus Indy's age. What was popular in the late 50's???? Sci Fi, ALiens! and Outer space, look it up and stop bitching about a movie. So you don't like it , who cares ..!!! get a life people lol

  • @dreamcaster4eva2011 Cmon its only a bad movie, with no mistery (you know whats gonna happen with the alien plot from the begining), no tramps nor emotive proofs moment, the bad guys doesnt kill people and Indy sare his starring leather position with a kid with no character....you doesnt have to be very intelligent to refuse this film. The other films was the elite of filming etertaining industrie in its respective years of production..in 2008 i can tell you at least 7 films far best than Indy4

  • @neofit0 I have no idea what you just wrote, I'm sorry I'm not trying to be mean or anything but I can't understand your typing.

  • Yeah

  • a pseudomovie with no soul...you can create a imaginative work with sourcer men and the Indy concept, but in here there wasnt work,..they did what they already know to do mix cg/fx cut and shoot with no new style no good script no effor nor adventure intention..only easy ideas like monkeys cg, copy paste soundtrack, or bad gags and embarrasing situations, there wasnt complicity at all with the viewer..they only did the movie for the easyest clients the childs

  • I'm a big fan of the first 3 films. As far as I'm conserned, Indy 4 is Harrison's "Never Say Never Again". You know.. the Connary /Speilberg Bond flick attempt. The one that should never be mentioned! So much so that it's not even part of the Bond movies box sets. Its a Shame that Lucas didn't have the good taste to do the same with Indy 4! To tell the truth, I went to see Indy 4 at the flicks and came away feeling, I had been robbed. I still feel my self cringing about Mutt the monkey boy!

  • I laughed at 0:23

  • that was 32 seconds

  • wow i have this movie record on my dvr

  • I left the theatre long befor Mutt the munkey boy! started his CGI vine swinging shit! I had to get up and go when , they arived in the very fake looking jungle set and ford is tossed a rubber snake, to get him out of quick sand! I dont think he realy ever made it out of that quick sand. hmmm!

  • I was hoping that mutt would say what u looking at daddy-o hahahahaha it's funny

  • 'THIS IS INTOLERABLE' well indiana jone's four sucked and always will, in The Last Crusade at the end there is a reason he rode into the sun set to siginal the end of the series. INTOLERABLE !! that sums it up.

  • I knew it was going to suck before I even walked in the theater, but my girlfriend dragged my ass to go see it. I almost walked out as soon as I saw the aliens..

  • thank you Sean Connery

  • Jonesy!

  • even THIS much of the movie is intolerable

  • that was great and i dont even hate 4 that much

  • @FthePo9ers dude, i watched the indy movies when i was like 5 and loved them...and i think the aliens made the 4th movie awesome. and dnt u think they were getting tired of Nazis? and they couldnt do Nazis because World War 2 was ovr and during that time the Cold War was starting so yeah i think some people liked it

  • That was 32 seconds.

  • anyone else notice that this was not 5 seconds?

  • THIS IS INTOLERABLE!!!!!!!!!!

  • JONESEY!

  • Sean pretty much sums it up right there!

    THIS IS INTOLERABLE!

  • @WafflezDay XD Got that right XD ^^

  • Sean Connery at the end pretty much sums up how we all felt as the credits rolled on Crystal Skull

  • Great nice title now you wasted 27seconda of my life ! Gf..

  • 5 seconds? More like 32

  • george lucas's grubby finger prints are all over this travesty.

  • Jonesy Jonesy Jonesy.........nachos :P

  • how does that fucking kid get so many big roles? he fucking sucks...

  • squeal boy!

  • the film was 'intolerable' 

  • I actually quite enjoyed the movie...although I can certainly understand why people did not. Hopefully if they make a fifth one (before Harrison Ford is wearing Depends) they can get a better script and get rid of the CGI. Unfortunately that would probably involve the now clinically insane George Lucas being confined to an institution. It sounds like he's having a hard time finding a good story. George, anybody with even a passing interest in archaeology could find a good story. Seriously.

  • i liked the part when he said JONESY!

  • why was the movie bad?

  • Who else lol'd at Sean Connery's "This is intolerable!"?

  • @HokutoAnsatsuken ME! ME! ME!

  • I never knew what that "George Lucas and Steven Spielberg are raping Indiana Jones" South Park thing meant until I watched this movie.

  • 0:13.

    FAIL. (At least he got punched which kinda makes up for it)

  • Comment removed

  • @filmflim you fucking dickhead. That's why it's in the fucking clip you moron.

  • George Lucas has the most annoying hateful Anti-fans of any film maker. Will all you nerds please shut the hell up?!!!

  • "This is intolerable!"

  • worst one of the seris and the aliens fucked it all up

  • @donnalea11

    WHY aliens? Indy and B-Movie: Bot very good bedfellows.

  • THEY'RE RAPING HIM!!!

  • way too long, it was more like 12 seconds

  • oh that's okay, this one was fine but i consider that they made the fourth just to say "you know the good old times"

    i don't blame them for making this film, i was happy to see Indy again, but the three others was much better, i agree!

  • I stopped watching after the first three, somewhat like what I did with Star Wars. I think the economy is to blame for the murder of these franchise movies. Companys need to put out a winner so they make an unessecary addition to an already great trilogy. They use minimal plot line and maximum CGI and star power. Love Indiana but this movie was a boring, can see it from a mile away, nazi free sleepfest.

  • The ending was fucking stupid... it's all like ''hey i'm an alien and I am escaping back to mars. the end''

  • THIS IS INTOLERABLE.

  • Speilberg didn't want to do this movie.

  • idk if there is a line in there that says: "this is a waste of time" or something like that but that woulda been a fitting 5 second video.

  • haha love the ending scene from the Last Crusade. summed up the movie pretty well

  • I am too scared to watch this film, as an avid fan of the old ones

  • @DasFunkwagen if a fan, dont watch it. Im still trying to get over the experience.

  • 0:15- 0:17 OWNED!

  • THIS IS INTOLERABLE! XD

  • @DragonSporks CONNERY SPEAKS TRUTH.

  • jonesy jonesy jonesy ATOMIC BOMB Jonsey!

  • thumbs up if steven spielberg raped your childhood with this movie

  • @snakekiller110 i don't get it. the movie was still indiana jones, who cares if it was aliens? and the lost ark full of evil spirits made more sense? just watch the damn movie and enjoy the classic whip-cracking, punch-sounding, wise-cracking action we all want to see.

  • I agree with Dr. Jones Senior. (About the actual movie. This vid is awesome.)

  • You said it Sean!

  • pappa jones

    

  • That last part was classic! Very funny, nice work.

  • Ray Winstone FTW!!!!

  • First 3 are all you need to watch. The 4th was purely a mistake.

  • pause at 0:23

  • Beautiful video and shows a great point :)

  • even the opening music sounds outdated. should have done a slight updated remix. the way it is gets me thinking "really?" what now?

  • that were some loooooong seconds :P

  • People need to relax about this film!!! it's just a movie not gospel. Of course they had to set the film in the 1950's because it's been 20 years since the third film. Harrison Ford is older so Indy is older. Regardless of the bad guys it's Harrison Ford that makes Indiana Jones work so well.

    But as a fan of the movie I have to say this was funny :D

  • @stubsfahey87 It's not that they had a problem with making it in the 1950s with an old Indiana Jones. In fact I think that was a really great element to it and added a lot of "old man" humor. What was stupid was that this focused on aliens, a completely irrelevant subject for the jones franchise which is solely about discovering religious historical artifacts (ten commandments, holy grail, Indian stones) and many of the gags were already used in the mummy and national treasure movies.

  • @stubsfahey87 no you need to quit stating the obvious and apologizing for this piece of shit!

  • @FthePo9ers Nazis? They can say "oh Indy just aged four times faster than normal and it was only 1940" no, twenty years later, RUSSIANS! Nazis are dead in 1957. "der furhur" is dead! He shot himself!

  • the movie sucked. i'm not exactly sure why. it just seems like they threw the whole thing together as they went along like "ok, tomorrow we'll shoot shia swinging through the trees like tarzan."

  • am i the only one that noticed that it was more than 5 seconds?? Just saying

  • lol This is intolerable

  • The monkey scene, in addition to watching Shia Le how ever you spell his name swing on branches was just disgusting. As a truly avid fan of the Indy movies, this was bad. It's like Lucas and Spielberg decided to make an Indy movie for kids.. With the aliens, the CGI, the fridge scene... It just sucks.

    And to be completely honest... Indy is not Indy without Nazis.

  • @FthePo9ers...

    speak for yourself...

    just because don't have nazis and have aliens dosen't means that suck...

    father saw all the movies and he loved all of them speciali this one...

    and the fridge scene was awesome,so stop hating and go see james rolfe newest top 10 and take a shame in you face you hater...

  • @igorfranklin83 well put fellow film fan

  • @FthePo9ers i blame Lucas he convinced Spielberg, theres an interview where Spielberg admits to not initially wanting to make another indy film. its just Lucas being money hungry as always

  • @FthePo9ers I hated how it turned into alien Sci-fi...

  • @FthePo9ers I liked the movie alot the part of the nuke and ape was sheit, that was embarresing , otherwise i thought this film was very good, the old film whit the nazi is ofc much better.

  • @FthePo9ers He did fine without Nazi's in Temple of Doom, though. In my opinion.

  • @FthePo9ers they couldnt make the movie with nazis cuz it wouldnt fit in the timeline.

  • @FthePo9ers Agreed. This one blew. Big. Stinking. Chunks.

  • @FthePo9ers Yeah, because "Temple Of Doom" was FILLED with Nazis. It is also a good thing that nothing else stupid or illogical in the original films. It isn't like Indy survived falling out of an airplane using an inflatable raft or somehow lived through going over a cliff with a friggin' tank, those things would've been stupid. And, as we all know, the Indiana Jones series is for mature audiences, no kid shit in here. So many adult moments like eating bugs and animal brains, and the slapstick.

  • @ReallyGoodJoe Couldn't have said it better myself. Most people hated this movie only because of the CGI. Hello people, get with the times, there's new technology today. Besides, I saw NOTHING in this movie that fits in a kid's film.

  • @acdcfan014 No no no, most people hated the movie because they could not connect with it or get into it. People are allowed to like it, thats true, but they are also allowed to dislike it and tell people they disliked it and not get harrassed by people like you lying and saying they disliked it due to CGI.

  • @ReallyGoodJoe Temple Of Doom is terrible, too.

  • @ReallyGoodJoe lol don't forget when he killed that guy with a giant shish kaboob in the intro of ToD

  • @FthePo9ers Shia LaBeef swinging around with monkeys was indeed disgusting. So disgusting, in fact, that I left the theater with vomit all over my shoes. And, you know, whenever I think of a kids movie, I think of an alien killing some Russian lady, a nuclear explosion sending an older man in a fridge flying through the air and violently hitting the ground, and CGI ants eating a man alive. Yep, Indy 4 was SO a kids movie, it is disgusting. I think I'm gonna spew again just thinking about it.....

  • @ReallyGoodJoe Calm down dear, calm down.

  • @ReallyGoodJoe talk about overreacting.

  • @ReallyGoodJoe troll, get a live

  • @FthePo9ers Temple of Doom didn't have Nazis.

  • Comment removed

  • @MrEvil37 and the TOD was chronologically before Raiders.

  • I would call it a worthless CGI crapfest but that would be unfair to movies like The Mummy Part 3: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor.

  • "But i liked the alien thing. If you think about it, its far more plausible than some magic stone, the ark of the covenant or the holy grail. That shit is just all made up. Aliens are actually real."

    Brilliant.

  • @oldskool2485 wtf you have no proof aliens are real LOL

  • @BadStart

    yes he was quoting someone else douche

  • @BadStart and you have no proof they aren't. at least this guy's is more probable. think about it. you know probabilities right? passed 4th grade?

  • George Lucas is probably one of the biggest sell-outs ever. First the Phantom Menace, and than this pile of shit. He should seriously stop making movies now.

  • @chrism60561 you want to try and make one? or are you just conforming to what a few people say? let me guess, avatar was the greatest film you've ever seen? Oh, and did you know that the first star wars was shot on a budget smaller i probably make in 4 months? (that's not a lot by the way).

  • @Mike28115 The guy is a business man first and a film-maker second. His last couple films are CGI filled pieces of crap. He did indeed sell out my good friend.

    P.S. Avatar was ok, but nominating it for best picture, give me a break.

  • @chrism60561 He doesn`y sell out, there is nothing wrong with CGU, he always liked digial technology, also the PT was AWESOME and if he was a bisnessman first, thanwhy did he do everything hinself, and did he have so much senate scenes, and boring Clone stories, why dodn`t he jusy not tell how Palpatine raise to power, ad show action, he is an artist first but yes he needs mobney to makr his movues..

  • Wow this film was so terrible. George Lucas you sold out a great story line for too much CG.

  • eer it's totally different in tone and feel and is quite frankly poor in comparison.

  • Bueno, los 5 segundos se alargan un poco, pero es un buen resumen :P

    jajajaja!

  • Sean Connery should have been in this one too. I miss him calling Indy "Junior."

  • @videogameguy24

    And son of Indiana (whateverhisnamewas) would say "Grandpa?"

    Well I thought it was pretty decent. It was Indiana Jones... With Aliens.

  • @videogameguy24 After seeing the movie a few times, I think we all know why Connery passed on this movie.

  • To be fair it was a cool film for the most part. Some bits were a bit sloppy. But i liked the alien thing. If you think about it, its far more plausible than some magic stone, the ark of the covenant or the holy grail. That shit is just all made up. Aliens are actually real. Unless your one of those bizarre people who think we are alone in the entire universe.

  • Dude i happen to think this is one of the best indy films, it has all the classic indy moments, its not some stupid young just playing indy its Harrison and if u watch this one and then Raiders...there are pretty much the same...yeah there was CGI...but its like Lucas and Spielberg wanted to do what they couldn't do 20 years ago... of course people say "it was absurd" well if you actually watch the movie i think Lucas and Spielberg where well aware that they were being absurd

  • well, the biggest problem most people had with the fourth movie was the whole alian ( or interdimesional beings) thing. I thought it was okay, but what i missed most was Indy shooting people. Raiders has that asome bar shootout scene, and The Crystal Skull had him shoot a bazooca... ONCE!

  • My god I forgot how shit this film is.

  • I liked the movie.

  • hahaha the ending is hysterical^^

  • Indiana Jones and the aliens was a shit film

  • That Film Really was Utter Shit.

  • They definitely lost the noir/graphic novel palette that they stuck to in the first films. You know, the deep reds, sepia, etc. There was certainly a lack of shadows in this film to add mood. It was too glossy and "Hollywood." The original films were supposed to look tough and gritty. Hell, they probably just had a much larger budget on this one than the previous films.

  • @mooreentstudios

    I disagree, as the first three films were set in the thirties, they were a tribute to the B-movies and serials from that time, as such they reflected that tone. Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was set in the fifties, it and therefore intended to be a tribute to the B-movies of that era which happened to be sci-fi, hence the more polished feel.

  • @simeoneous

    *...set in the fifties and was therefore...

    I'm a spaz.

  • @simeoneous

    This is very true. And, once you look at it that way, it's actually not that bad. But I still feel the film was lacking the charm and aesthetic of in-camera effects and hand painted mattes. Something I hope to see return in the possible 5th installment - Spielberg's said himself that he wishes to return to those traditions.

  • Yes I agree there was too much CGI, way too much. The problem is everything that happened in movies since Crusade meant with this one they felt they had to bring it up to date to compete.

    There was still some of the old magic in there and to be honest but I'm a lot older now. If Kingdom had come out in '91 when I was 11, I would have probably enjoyed it just as much and feel as nostalgic about it as the first three.

  • @mooreentstudios i agree with the decrease in reds, but the majority was shot in the green of south america. So idk. Maybe the gritty sepia made Harrison look too old to be in the movie.

  • @mooreentstudios no shit dude. pretty much all the remakes have been this way

  • @mooreentstudios Thank you. That was the first thing I noticed about this film, and I'm glad someone else picked up on it, too.

  • When they were making this movie Spielberg kept saying how he wanted the 'look' of it to be just like the original films in regaurds to the colour palette, lighting etc.

    You can see when it shows that bit from Last Crusade at the end how much they failed.

  • They wanted to keep a feel of 'what if Indiana Jones was in the 50's...", hence the cartoonish and colorish look of the film.

  • Nah, they were just too over reliant on processed shots and filmed too much of it on sets rather than going on location.

    It's not all their fault though, apparently the whole jungle car chase was supposed to be done for real but a hurricaine hit the area so the whole thing had to be greenscreened in the end. Kinda makes you wonder what might have been.

  • this should've ended @ 0:15.i like my 5 second videos to be shorter.

  • JONESY

    lol

  • JONESEYY!!! :D

  • Shaun connery made this video LOL

  • lol jonesey! jonesey! indy!

  • THIS IS INTOLERABLE!

  • To all that didn't like indy 4:"WHY?" It was a great movie. All of you tell me why u didnt like it. I just dont understand.

  • This is awful.

  • it WAS a lead refridgerator after all... :p

  • omfg your stupid...

  • Comment removed

  • yup like everything in indiana jones movies are believable......shut up

  • Hey, fuck you buddy. The reason people didn't like Indy 4 wasn't because of believebility, it was because it didn't fit with the other movies, and featured pointless, unfunny gags.

    Are you going to defend spiderman 3 next?

  • So what if people like movies that fall short of your expectations? Most people liked Spidey 3 and Indy 4, they just don't spend their lives on forums like you do. Suck it.  LaurenceRoques got the most +'s on this page, so that goes to show you that they liked the new movie.

  • Oh dear god, the only people who like spidey 4 are the people who don't give a shit about it. Don't you dare defend that thing. Sure it had some great action, but every waking moment I had watching what they did to venom made me want to puke. And who the hell is "LaurenceRoques"?

    Oh, and I don't think youtube comments count as a forum.

    Its not that the movie just fell short, it fell short, and then fell into an abyss of stupidity. Watch indy 4 with the rifftrax for it, you'll see what I mean.

  • LaurenceRoques is the comment I'm pushing off this page with this comment. He defended the movie and got 13 thumbs up. mst3k is my favorite show ever. So what if they did a rifftrax for it? They did one for The Dark Knight also. Do you really need to base your opinion off of what Mike Nelson and Kevin Murphy say? It's not serious at all, they're just making fun.

    BTW, Spidey 3, along with 2, was actually cool. In 3, Tobey Mac wasn't such a p****.

  • Go watch the movie with the rifftrax. They spend the entire time pointing out how retarded the whole film is.

  • Comment removed

  • Will you morons shut the fuck up about the Aliens damn. Indy has found just about EVERYTHING else if any of you ever read the novels or comic book's you would know. Aliens was a good choice at least it wasn't bigfoot

  • You just forget to put those "FU..ING CGI CHIPMUNKS" from the begining in your awsome montage!

  • i acctually luv indiana jones 4.

    it was a nice change.