Added: 4 years ago
From: BillsDotCom
Views: 2,770
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • tell the IRS TO LICK MY BALLS AND THE FED CAN EAT MY ASS

  • To say the income tax is voluntary is a corruption of statements made by the IRS, the courts, and Congress to encourage taxpayer compliance with the law, without the need for legal action against taxpayers. When confronted by claims that income taxes are voluntary, courts readily explain that the payment of income tax is mandatory, not optional: Appellants claim that payment of federal income tax is voluntary clearly lacks substance. Helvering v. Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 399 (1938).

  • Article. I. Section. 2. "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years"

    this has yet to be removed from our Constitution so there for you can't add something that goes agents this and also you have yet to give me the law code that say you have to pay

  • Who told you that???? That's ridiculous. Check Websters for the definition of "amendment". So, my friend, does that mean that the 14th amendment, which provides for equal protection, does not apply to the former slaves? Becuae, guess what, the 3/5ths clause in the body of the Constitution, which states that they are to be counted as 3/5ths of a person for congressional apportionment pursposes, is still there. It hasn't been removed.

  • that maybe so but you still have yet to give me a law code that says you have to pay a federal income tax you've addressed everything but the law code im not talking about section 61 or title 26 im talking about the law code that enforces that amendment

  • Try section 1 of Title 26, "There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual . . . who is not a married individual a tax determined in accordance with the following table:" followed by a table specifying the tax rates on various income amounts. If you are married, you are covered by the similar provision at section 1(a).

  • wrong thats the title it explanes what the title is ok you know how you get a speeding ticket an they say you violated this law code (what ever it maybe where you live) thats what im asking for your section 1 of title 26 only says what it is an there is no enforcement also i would really like to recommend you to watch "theft by deception" it breaks down the hole title 26 it detail but its an hour an a half long... enjoy

  • its been almost a week an you still haven't answered my question what is the law code that you violate when you dont pay a federal income tax?

  • And I told you! Section 1 of Title 26. That is the exact, precise law. Would you like me to get you the Public Law number?

  • I've got some good videos on how you can pay up to 0% tax and it's LEGAL.

    Take a look at the tax wizards * com

  • WARNING!!!!!!!!

    the I.R.S. is an illegal tax on the people of the United States

    there its NO law that requires U.S. citizens 100% of your tax dollars goes to line the pockets of the banks dont believe me? than prove me wrong!!

  • Bullshit

  • really? prove me wrong

  • Prove you wrong??!! *lol* It's called the tax code, Title 26, and the 16th Amendment. I know you'll try to parse words and say it doesn't apply, but the courts have consistently held that position to be wrong. You are the one who needs to prove ME wrong.

  • no where in "Title 26" does it say that a person has to pay taxes on there wages the "16th Amendment" was NEVER LEGALLY ratified do some research theres TONS of vids on youtube an TONS of websites court cases an Gov. documents saying that the "Federal Income Tax" is an illegal tax

  • 1). Yes it does.

    2). Yes it was.

    Both of these issues have been reviewed by the courts many times and have been upheld by them. End of story.

  • ok wheres your proof? everywhere i look everywhere i see i always see an hear no so give me the law code that states that a person has to pay taxes on there wages

  • This issue has come before the federal court system numerous times, including the supreme court. Each time, the courts have upheld the validity of the ratification of the 26th Amendment AND the Income tax. End of story. It's the law. Period.

  • still haven't seen a code till you can give me the code your wrong

  • The Internal Revenue Code does not define income. Technically correct, but irrelevant. Section 61 of the Internal Revenue Code defines gross income, from which taxable income is calculated, as all income from whatever source derived and gives a number of examples of the types of income included in gross income in section 61, including compensation for services (i.e., wages, salaries, and other forms of earned income).

  • Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 US 103 (1916) (Entire text of ruling)

    "...by the previous ruling, it was settled that the provisions of the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation but simply prohibited the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from being taken out of the category of INDIRECT taxation to which it inherently belonged.."

    so there for if you didn't pay taxes before the 16th amendment you dont have to after it

  • "In substance, the court holds that the Sixteenth Amendment did not empower the Federal Government to levy a new tax."

    New York Times

    January 25, 1916

    "Based on research....by the Congressional Research Service, there is no provision which....requires....an individual to pay an income tax."

    Letter from Senator Daniel Inoway to Tom Selgas of Tax Honesty.

  • "It's actually very simple. Congress tried to enact an income tax in 1894 the Supreme Court said that is unconstitutional. When the Supreme Court says something is unconstitutional, its unconstitutional. They tried again in 1913 and the Supreme Court said the 16th amendment conferred

  • no new power of taxation. So if they didn't have it then, and they didn't get it, they don't have it. There is no constitutional base for a tax on wages for Americans living and working in the fifty states of the union. Period, end of argument."

  • 26 crf ch.1

    "the purpose of publishing revenue rulings and revenue procedures in the internal revenue bulletin is to promote correct and uniform application of the tax laws by internal revenue service employees and to assist taxpayers in attaining maximum VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE" so there for you dont have to pay

  • Tax protestors love to quote some old Supreme Court opinions that say that the Sixteenth Amendment "conferred no new power of taxation." Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co. This conclusion is false.

  • The short answer is that, while the Supreme Court did hold that the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation, the amendment relieved the pre-existing power to tax incomes from the constitutional requirement of apportionment. Therefore, the previous problem with the income tax was removed and the income tax is now constitutional.

  • Good free info on tax resolution for IRS debts.

  • It's great to see these kind of videos. We can read about debt consolidation, tax resolution, mortgage refinance all day, but it's nice to have someone just tell it to you straight! Thanks, this helped.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more