Added: 10 months ago
From: olyv1
Views: 6,105
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Horowitz treats this piece as a caricature. He plays it not as an elegant waltz but as a bombastc mechanical piece with his bizarre sense of art,. Godowsky plays it as it should be.

  • @freeqwerqwer who new rachmaninov? :)

  • @freeqwerqwer horowitz was very good friends with rachmaninov so I'm sure he new better than anyone how to perform his music.

  • @MrTomt1990 , it's "knew", not "new". Whether someone personally knows someone else is irrelevant. It is evident Horowitz is an overrated interpreter. Check out Godowsky's version.

  • @freeqwerqwer "For Rachmaninoff, Horowitz was a champion of both his solo works and his Third Concerto, about which Rachmaninoff remarked publicly after the 7 August 1942 Hollywood Bowl performance that “This is the way I always dreamed my concerto should be played, but I never expected to hear it that way on Earth.”"

  • Op.34 No.2 is a waltz

  • @New4785689 Of course, you're right ! Thanks.

  • wrong description, two waltz were played

  • @New4785689 Really ?! I've rechecked my video: it only contains the 8 titles of the description above, and only one waltz (op. 64 n°2 in C sharp minor). Which waltz is missing in your opinion ?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more