British asshole! In closing he states "a country that prides itself on the freedom to own a weapon for hunting and self defense" Wrong!! The right to bare arms in in place in the event the people need to fight tyranny and a repressive government should our freedoms become compromised. Example---The British controlling the colonies LOL LOL. I guess our British commentator didn't see fit to discuss that particular topic.
Last I recall in England, their is a serious problem with people getting knifed. Killers are going to kill, doesn't matter if they have access to guns or not!
Lol. British media. This reporter is a tool. Let's see... 9 dead... that's 3 less than the twelve Derrick Bird killed in his 2010 rampage in Cumbria. Yep, in jolly old England. You know, the place that prides itself on it's strict gun-control and has mostly disarmed its population. Wtf-ever my friend. Liberal P.O.S.
Just another asshole trying to sell me real-estate in the Utopian-Fantasyland they could create for us if only we'd all just "give up our guns". Fuck off, redcoat.
sorry to inform all of you who thought it was illegal to send soldiers to the streets of Alabama. but it was the ALABAMA NATIONAL GUARD!!! the governor can call the national guard when the state needs help!!!! the Army National Guard has a dual mission, they can be called upon by the President of the USA, and they can be called upon by the State Governor. the National Guard is ran by the states governments. NOT the federal government!!!!
@trilllowkey Yep you are correct. The guard takes it's orders from the state. If the federal government calls upon the guard I believe it must be in cooperation with the states governer. The last time there was a conflict between a governer and President over the used of the Guard was the Wallace-Johnson showdown where Federal troops were sent to face off against Wallace and his National Guard to allow intergration in southern schools.
Guy's they deploy troops every chance they get so people will become use to see them and begin to believe that it is no big deal. Then less people will be ready to stand and fight when the government call for Martial law.
Why are they putting armed soldiers on US soil, this is against the Constitution. No armed military force is to take up arms against it's own people. But hey I was in NO and there were FMT's all over the place and mean from Israel and Italy and Spain Mexico, so the fix is in. Good luck and good bye USA
First off your a dumb ass. State govt. calls on Guard troops all the time for help with problems. Also many State govt's local counties have agreements with military police to help one another and patrol certain areas.
Also pay attention to this video. You hear a "British" speaker. The UK is a police state that runs anti-American news to scare its citizens into doing what it wants. There is 1 camera for every 14 citizens no guns allowed and they still have the highest crime in Europe.
To call on the national guard is fine, but the troops in NO were troops that had recently been in the ME. You should know that many people down there saw and spoke to troops that were not USGI, they were BW, those are private troops. I also know there is a training base in Boloxi Ms as well as Pensacola Fla which is 2 hrs away from NO. I was born there.
This is an excellent observations and 100% right! The UK has the 3rd highest crime rate in the World, and they rule their citizens with martial law all the time. Thats why the US had to fight the British in 1776!
It is the point that the armed forces are never to be sent out for a civic problem.Don't you know your own Constitution. Whoa, so dumbed down you can't even see what is wrong.
fuckin right . gun ownership is necessary. keep your opinion in your own country . why the fuck did they bring in the army for this? they must be pateiently waiting for shit to go down.
British asshole! In closing he states "a country that prides itself on the freedom to own a weapon for hunting and self defense" Wrong!! The right to bare arms in in place in the event the people need to fight tyranny and a repressive government should our freedoms become compromised. Example---The British controlling the colonies LOL LOL. I guess our British commentator didn't see fit to discuss that particular topic.
mrtrek64 9 months ago
@mrtrek64 Meanwhile in britain self defense of any kind is pretty much illegal but the cops won't help you.
kinggilgamesh76 8 months ago
More law abiding citizens with guns = less crime. Assault victims UK=2.8%, US=1.2%, total crime victims UK=24.6%, US=10%.
vsnips 1 year ago
Last I recall in England, their is a serious problem with people getting knifed. Killers are going to kill, doesn't matter if they have access to guns or not!
acetong1990 1 year ago 6
Lol. British media. This reporter is a tool. Let's see... 9 dead... that's 3 less than the twelve Derrick Bird killed in his 2010 rampage in Cumbria. Yep, in jolly old England. You know, the place that prides itself on it's strict gun-control and has mostly disarmed its population. Wtf-ever my friend. Liberal P.O.S.
Just another asshole trying to sell me real-estate in the Utopian-Fantasyland they could create for us if only we'd all just "give up our guns". Fuck off, redcoat.
RugerMan73 1 year ago
HELL RIGHT WE PRIDE OURSELVES WE HAVE ALOT LESS CRIME WITH GUN RIGHTS MORONIC REPORTER
MirageScience 1 year ago
sorry to inform all of you who thought it was illegal to send soldiers to the streets of Alabama. but it was the ALABAMA NATIONAL GUARD!!! the governor can call the national guard when the state needs help!!!! the Army National Guard has a dual mission, they can be called upon by the President of the USA, and they can be called upon by the State Governor. the National Guard is ran by the states governments. NOT the federal government!!!!
trilllowkey 1 year ago
@trilllowkey Yep you are correct. The guard takes it's orders from the state. If the federal government calls upon the guard I believe it must be in cooperation with the states governer. The last time there was a conflict between a governer and President over the used of the Guard was the Wallace-Johnson showdown where Federal troops were sent to face off against Wallace and his National Guard to allow intergration in southern schools.
mrtrek64 9 months ago
Guy's they deploy troops every chance they get so people will become use to see them and begin to believe that it is no big deal. Then less people will be ready to stand and fight when the government call for Martial law.
nonsmokerable 2 years ago
@nonsmokerable So what makes you think that soldiers are going to listen to their orders and hurt the people they are protecting?
bcBryanbc 2 years ago
Why are they putting armed soldiers on US soil, this is against the Constitution. No armed military force is to take up arms against it's own people. But hey I was in NO and there were FMT's all over the place and mean from Israel and Italy and Spain Mexico, so the fix is in. Good luck and good bye USA
clarisd 3 years ago
First off your a dumb ass. State govt. calls on Guard troops all the time for help with problems. Also many State govt's local counties have agreements with military police to help one another and patrol certain areas.
Also pay attention to this video. You hear a "British" speaker. The UK is a police state that runs anti-American news to scare its citizens into doing what it wants. There is 1 camera for every 14 citizens no guns allowed and they still have the highest crime in Europe.
Warpath2198 2 years ago
To call on the national guard is fine, but the troops in NO were troops that had recently been in the ME. You should know that many people down there saw and spoke to troops that were not USGI, they were BW, those are private troops. I also know there is a training base in Boloxi Ms as well as Pensacola Fla which is 2 hrs away from NO. I was born there.
clarisd 2 years ago
This is an excellent observations and 100% right! The UK has the 3rd highest crime rate in the World, and they rule their citizens with martial law all the time. Thats why the US had to fight the British in 1776!
HolyKngt 1 year ago
they did not bring in the army. the army helped with traffic control..how do i know..i was a local televison reporter that covered the events
dbondy1 3 years ago
It is the point that the armed forces are never to be sent out for a civic problem.Don't you know your own Constitution. Whoa, so dumbed down you can't even see what is wrong.
clarisd 3 years ago
fuckin right . gun ownership is necessary. keep your opinion in your own country . why the fuck did they bring in the army for this? they must be pateiently waiting for shit to go down.
sjfmeyers67 3 years ago 8