I read somewhere that the real meaning behind the video was pretty dark. If you see some scenes you'll notice that they're in reverse. So, if you look at the whole video in reverse, the two robots are actually being separated and put-down because of "love". The obvious meaning that people take,i.e., two robots making love, is a bit too simplistic.
I looked the clip after reading your post. and I think you are right. although you call it "simplistic" your point of view quite spoils it(no offence)
but it makes it far more harder to understand the clip.
yes, i thought that twist was really interesting, also noting that it is two female robots being depicted. This video depicts a sort of emotional sentience among bots (way beyond artificial intelligence). Parts of the video are clearly in reverse (liquid rising up etc) and the director made no effort to hide this fact. Liquid makes it quite obvious.
This twist does spoil the "happy love" tone of the video, but depicts that a dark side exists parallel to the reality we perceive.
@rakshan Yes, you could say it has a dark tone to it but I highly doubt that there is some pessimistic, Joy Divisionesque underlying message about love within the video. I think a lot of people forget that art is often very anti-intellectual, and they put their own spin on what they see. But that's also part of what art is here for - reflecting. Chris was just following Bjork's visual ideas - these aren't really intellectual exercises. But I see what you are saying.
Hm, it is a beautiful song. But I still try to get it together with that robots-video. They kind of scare me! ....but that definitely hasn't been the intention. I guess for that song I would have thought of something different. Hm.... ;/
WHEN U R READING THIS DONT STOP OR SOMETHING BAD WILL HAPPEN MY NAME IS SUMMER I AM 15 YEARS OLD i have BLONDE HAIR , SCARS no NOSE OR EARS I AM DEAD IF U DONT COPY THIS JUS LIKE FROM THE RING COPY N POST THIS ON 5 MORE SITES OR I WILL APPEAR ONE CREEPY NIGHT WEN UR NOT ExPECTING IT BY YOUR BED WITH A NIFE AND KILL U THIS IS NO JOKE SUMMET ING GOOD WILL HAPPEN TO U IF YOU POST THIS ON 5 MORE FLASH BOXES
I would have to disagree with Peasandpeas' comment and say that Robots are infact the appropriate objects. Because robots are hard, sterile, clean, logical and in control. Love is just the opposite, soft, messy, illogical and uncontrollable - seeing Robots in the act of 'love making' just makes the espression just that much stronger...
CHRIS CUNNINGHAM FUCKED UP THE VIDEOOOOOOOO!! She should've gotten another director. Robots?!?! That isn't soft enough for the atmosphere of the song and what she described!!
Robots were perfect. Robots are innocent, efficient, and logical--like love. They were the perfect embodiment of it; the perfect representation of sexual love brought down to its bare essentials. I seriously think that neither Björk nor the director explicitly intended it that way, but that's the way it happened, so they must have implicitly expected it to be like that. And in response to "That isn't soft enough," I say this: The video is about love. Love isn't soft.
I think the music video for all is full of love is the most amazing video ever.
CopperEye108 7 months ago
I love her use of guttural sounds to describe what she means its surprisingly effective but hilarious
Hunkisthecoolest 8 months ago
4:01 "moo-niters" lol
namesofold 1 year ago
I wish there was one of these for every Bjork video! I'd love to know where the inspiration and ideas came for all of the concepts!
hca07mjb 1 year ago 2
Her voice annoys me.
Spectralancer 1 year ago
watch her fingers when she says erotic! LMFAO
lycrahoofie 2 years ago 18
lol...I'm pretty sure the editors didn't notice that...
lordsupreme210 2 years ago
I read somewhere that the real meaning behind the video was pretty dark. If you see some scenes you'll notice that they're in reverse. So, if you look at the whole video in reverse, the two robots are actually being separated and put-down because of "love". The obvious meaning that people take,i.e., two robots making love, is a bit too simplistic.
rakshan 3 years ago
I looked the clip after reading your post. and I think you are right. although you call it "simplistic" your point of view quite spoils it(no offence)
but it makes it far more harder to understand the clip.
but still respect for finding this out:)
creationisevolution 3 years ago
interesting, although I think that's reading into it a little too seriously. It is a simplistic song with a simplistic meaning, that's all.
LightofBeauty 3 years ago
Any video can be read into seriously. I think rakshan has a very clever implicit idea there.
LTstudios 2 years ago
do you have source to this info?
StrangerJeremy 3 years ago
@rakshan that is really interesting
BlancType6 1 year ago
Comment removed
rakshan 1 year ago
@BlancType6
yes, i thought that twist was really interesting, also noting that it is two female robots being depicted. This video depicts a sort of emotional sentience among bots (way beyond artificial intelligence). Parts of the video are clearly in reverse (liquid rising up etc) and the director made no effort to hide this fact. Liquid makes it quite obvious.
This twist does spoil the "happy love" tone of the video, but depicts that a dark side exists parallel to the reality we perceive.
rakshan 1 year ago
@rakshan That's a nice theory, but no. The lyrical content is pretty clear.
madsketcher 1 year ago
@madsketcher
Its not the lyrical content. Its the visualization. Chris Cunningham's videos have a dark undertone. Look at his other work.
rakshan 1 year ago
@rakshan Yes, you could say it has a dark tone to it but I highly doubt that there is some pessimistic, Joy Divisionesque underlying message about love within the video. I think a lot of people forget that art is often very anti-intellectual, and they put their own spin on what they see. But that's also part of what art is here for - reflecting. Chris was just following Bjork's visual ideas - these aren't really intellectual exercises. But I see what you are saying.
madsketcher 1 year ago
hmm.. she looks kinda like Annette Ozlen here.
UglyCrazyWorthless 3 years ago
the interview was when she was recoreded the video? or more later, in the record of médulla? her hair style is the same of the medulla stage..
mariorlanzas 4 years ago
she is icelandic, and very cool, and her music too, seen her in Amsterdam on 8 juli 2007, it was very very nice !!! greets from a BIG FAN !
jornmulder 4 years ago 6
Amazing video and song, she is an alien not a human being cool. He also did Madonna's Frozen clip
dandyboy1 4 years ago
well i think the vids gr8. and i really like this version. which does she perform live?
sleater84 4 years ago
Great post thanks, this song/video is beautiful
stopmeltingme 4 years ago
I love her hair, and her hand gesture for erotic. Heh heh. She's incredible.
pyrolite2 4 years ago 11
hehe i caught that, shes gr8
sleater84 4 years ago 3
like..like like a rock or something.. yea.. like like.. yea.. lol
ShenOmega 4 years ago
She"s so weird and cool. :)
Sessshy 4 years ago 2
Very interesting to see. I usually don´t like computer-generated-animation but this is awesome, I don´t see that it´s done by a puter!
inorcistartist 4 years ago
I want one of those robots.
spritenite 4 years ago
Hm, it is a beautiful song. But I still try to get it together with that robots-video. They kind of scare me! ....but that definitely hasn't been the intention. I guess for that song I would have thought of something different. Hm.... ;/
AnnieBBln31 4 years ago
it's not aphex twin, it's chris cunningham.
exstt 4 years ago
How did this video do on MTV?
comatoselucy 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHEN U R READING THIS DONT STOP OR SOMETHING BAD WILL HAPPEN MY NAME IS SUMMER I AM 15 YEARS OLD i have BLONDE HAIR , SCARS no NOSE OR EARS I AM DEAD IF U DONT COPY THIS JUS LIKE FROM THE RING COPY N POST THIS ON 5 MORE SITES OR I WILL APPEAR ONE CREEPY NIGHT WEN UR NOT ExPECTING IT BY YOUR BED WITH A NIFE AND KILL U THIS IS NO JOKE SUMMET ING GOOD WILL HAPPEN TO U IF YOU POST THIS ON 5 MORE FLASH BOXES
kikkkkaaa 4 years ago
Shut up with the chain letter crap.
123456yellll 4 years ago
Why do we have to over-ANALyze everything? Just enjoy the damn song and video!
Christopher81 4 years ago
The robots were real. The face was real. Freaking...
Holy crap.
Dagibit 4 years ago
i know i was like HOLY FREAKIN SHIT AWESOME
deadringersilence 4 years ago
I don't really like the video either, but she asks for white things with a hard surface. And those robots fit pretty good into that description.
PaulineVHS 5 years ago
I agree with jonin , althought peas have some good points.
DjBeast 5 years ago
chris and bjork make a great team
anticliche321 5 years ago
I would have to disagree with Peasandpeas' comment and say that Robots are infact the appropriate objects. Because robots are hard, sterile, clean, logical and in control. Love is just the opposite, soft, messy, illogical and uncontrollable - seeing Robots in the act of 'love making' just makes the espression just that much stronger...
joninberlin 5 years ago
exactly
deadringersilence 4 years ago
Heh , i think the video is fine , but oh well
DjBeast 5 years ago
CHRIS CUNNINGHAM FUCKED UP THE VIDEOOOOOOOO!! She should've gotten another director. Robots?!?! That isn't soft enough for the atmosphere of the song and what she described!!
QLateralus6 5 years ago
Robots were perfect. Robots are innocent, efficient, and logical--like love. They were the perfect embodiment of it; the perfect representation of sexual love brought down to its bare essentials. I seriously think that neither Björk nor the director explicitly intended it that way, but that's the way it happened, so they must have implicitly expected it to be like that. And in response to "That isn't soft enough," I say this: The video is about love. Love isn't soft.
Peasandpeas 5 years ago
wow
MasterG06 5 years ago
lollll!
DjBeast 5 years ago
eww dude...no richard thats not right
grayfox663 5 years ago
Sweet.
bibowski 5 years ago
thank you
ninamichaela 5 years ago
interesting
stormar 5 years ago