Too much of what Howard Hunt said was bullshit, sorry. Ex-army nut Phillip J Corso wrote a bullshit book about aliens at Roswell - am I supposed to believe that too, now??
This guys know that they only have to hold their lies long enough for the public outcry to fade away.
Gutless AMERICANS, live in their Beer, TV and Shopping induced COMA.
THEY WILL DO NOTHING and the abusers will repeat over and over again, see 9-11. while they enslave USA with the Federal Reserve and the planet with the World Bank and the Intl Monetary Fund.
The CIA will destroy and suppress all evidence, while disclosure times (75 yrs) assure the guilty accomplices a long shameless lives.
The COVER UP by the CIA, FBI, SECRET SERVICE, the members of the WARREN COMMISSION: Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the US, John J. McCloy, President of the World Bank (1895-1989), Gerald Ford (R-MI), U.S. Representative (Bribed later with the 38th Presidency of the US),
PROVES THEIR IMPLICATION in the plot, ALSO a PROOF of a POWER ABOVE THE PRESIDENCY who decides WHO LIVES OR DIES.
Presidents are only puppets of this POWER, if they don't obey: JFK is the example.
Also if all the footage of all the film and pictures that the government have, if they were released, we would have 100% proof, were the shot's came from, but, everyone knows were the shot's came from and possiable by who, it's about what the USA People and justice department will do about it, with current proof, but that will never happen. Confession's or not, only time it will it will rest, is when true justice and people responsable pay for it, only then it will stop.
Have the Priest's been interviewed and what they have to say, also as we all know, the start of broadcast, no mention of the elm street route, crowd thing out, why, most of the person's there were put there to do 1 thing Kill JFK no matter what, also it's justice the people want and those responsable to pay for what they did, but that will never happen. PS: The Stemmon's sign removed with in days, why, due to bullet hole through it, also the windscreen on GC-000 or SS-100 X ?,+ 7.65 Mauser ?
By 7:34 I can hear 5 shots on this film, then they say 4, later they say 3, were there echos? Is the sound to this real or made up later? Since you can hear 5 shots why doesn't the film talk about that? Isn't it possible that the neck wound could be on exit? It's incomprehensible that such a poor autopsy was done. A case could be made for exhumation to repeat the autopsy at present times.
MJ-12 asasinated President Kennedy when he informed them that he was going to tell the public all the facts of the alien presence. He was killed by the Secret Service agent driving his car and it is plainly visible in the film held from public view.
that's real power when you can take out the most important man on the planet at the time and not be held accountable dam oswald was a patriot the covert operation of disinformation is still in effect the war goes on the rules of engagenment have changed rip JFK
For several years I resisted believing JFK had authorized a covert Cuban destabilization/coup operation run by his brother Jack as US Attorney General, a deep-cover parallel to FBI's Operation 40 & CIA's Operation Mongoose. But the more I've read I suspect White House's anti-Castro operation assets & planning were coopted by Deep State principle's & used against JFK himself, making gov. complicit in helping to cover-up conspiracy to limit fallout that would damage the office & JFK's legacy..
You gotta vote though. The game may be rigged but you can still win if you get really, really lucky. If everybody in this country voted against the military industrial complex then they would be forced into submission. They thrive on our apathy and ignorance. Now they may try to rig the election if they lose or assassinate whomever wins that they don't want, but at least the ball will be in their court. If they pull more shit like that somebody will know and expose it like they did with Kennedy.
Who cares where the shooter was.....with E Howard Hunts conffession, it is confirmed what we all already knew. America experienced a coup in 1963. LBJ, Hoover, CIA and military guys, were all complicite....plain and simple. And the Mainstream media, says, why hasn't the plot leaked in all these years, well it has, and they do nothing, just blame Oswald.
Unfortunately doesn't mention the killer head-shot made from the storm drain, below street level, to the right front of JFK limo. Also doesn't mention Dr. James Fetzer's important ongoing work, including his 2003 symposium which shows major advances in science to back up what we already know - JFK was killed by conspiracy.
I DON'T KNOW WHY ALL YOU PEOPLE ARE STILL DEBATING THIS!!! JFK WAS UNQUESTIONABLY, UNDENIABLY, ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A FUCKING DOUBT KILLED BY HIS OWN GOVERNMENT, THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, MY GOVERNMENT... All the proof has been written down and put in books over these many years by the many EXTREMELY IMPORTANT people that had EVERYTHING to do with it.. It's not a question and anyone who disputes it is only shinning a spot light on their own unfamiliarity with the subject...
No because you're not old enought- see that's your thinking- some one presents evidence contrary to what you've grown up thinking and you straight away blow it off
That's why you'll never look into anything different then what they teach you- I was a registered Democrat for nearly 20 years and left the party because I was tired of being told what to think- and what i thought was right wasn't right all the time- but I believed in that party line for years- just an example of changing the way you see thin
@autoad they didnt find no fragments in that car if they did they could have done those test you talking about where you get those crappy facts from lho was a patsy why you think they kiled him
Do you people have watched Shooters movies? Well i think it similiar with what happens to Oswald, but the differences Oswald not Hollywood actor so he he had bad ending....
autoad, your comments are so patronizing to everyone. And you do not know more than all of the witnesses, doctors, scientists, policemen, FBI agents, CIA agents and many others who have provided overwhelming evidence of multiple gunmen and conspiracy. Your comments are not only insulting to the intelligence, they are demeaning to the memory of the people who have died because of this conspiracy.
An observation: There are five "dubbed in" shots. Two shots struck the president and five were fired. Don't you think the people who supposedly put the conspiracy together and hired the gunmen to shoot the president would have selected people who could shoot better? Two out of five shots is 40% accuracy. That's terrible!
Oswald was a better shot than these "world class" gunman when he fired at a rapid rate. He hit the target 96% and 98% from 200 yards. All this talk of "conspiracy is bunk!
Our Government stands for truth and justice and they are right, no matter what. Just get back to work and keep paying your taxes, there's nothing to see here folks!
Another disinfo/shill exposed. USS Maine, Lusitania, Mohammed Mossadegh (operation ajax), Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, Jaime Roldos, Salvador Allende, Omar Torrijos, Watergate, Keating 5 S&L scandal, Iran Contra, Theres a list of covert ops for you to debunk. It never ends, play your disinfo game elsewhere. I challenge your credibilty, If im a conspiracy theorist that makes you a coincidence theorist. History wil lnot absolve us, do you want your children to live in tyranny?
@babybluesnowden i been tryna point this type of thing out to autodad but hes got an automind automatically agree's with whatever the government tells him, simple minded people are who these criminals depend on cuz they swallow the hole load like a cheap hooker, people like us ask questions where questions should be asked, point out discrepencys where they are obvious and arnt close minded, im canadian and i agree 100% with all you've said and ron paul is our only hope
@grantdeshane if we leave it to the tyrants we have in power in the spotight and behind the spotlight our world is doom'd well they are safe in their football stadium sized bunkers, ron paul is this worlds only hope of getting back on the right track and the right moral and ethical views of how a world and government should be run, if the founding fathers was alive today and seen this garbage they wouldnt be assassinated theyd fukin kill themselves
@grantdeshane There's something you should know about what I believe and don't. Many years ago I was convinced there was a conspiracy behind the assassination. Not anymore. Logic, reasoning and a willingness to challenge my own beliefs about what happened in Dallas to hold. My change didn't take happen overnight. The conspiracy theories are interesting, but there's no evidence to support them.
@autoad I agree with you except for one thing, there is no way that the bullets came from Oswald's direction and distance. Also the frequencies of shots are too close together for a bolt action hunting rifle with a scope. With this rifle he could have only got one accurate shot off in the time that we see on the film. The scope alone makes it too hard to make a quick re-load, aim, fire, let alone 4 shots. This was multiple assassins.
5.The 3 shot was fired at 88 yards. That is well within his range of proficiency.
6. A Mannlicher bolt action can be fired at very high rate. Here on YouTube you can see six shots fired in 5.1 seconds from a Mannlicher with accuracy. LHO fired 3 in slightly more that 8 seconds.
7. There is no medical, physical, ballistic or forensic evidence to support shots fired from the front or side of JFK.
Sorry, there's no evidence of anyone other than LHO shooting JFK.
@autoad I can PLAINLY see that the shot is coming from the front. His brains splatter to the back. and why would he be grabbing the front of his neck?
@marktwainisgod Scientific analysis of the Z-film shows the particulate matter from the head shot moving forward. A frontal shot would have produced the following;
1. An exit wound to the right rear of his head
2. A high probability of Jackie being struck by the exiting bullet and/or bullet fragments and/or particulate matter.
3. A head-on frontal shot would create an exit wound to the back of his head and the particulate matter would have covered the trunk and/or the follow-up SS vehicle.
@autoad Jackie was in the line of fire for LHO. So was the driver. A shot from the upper rear would have blown JFK's forehead or face off. The autopsy pictures show the exit to the back/right. The military also has used many different kinds of bullets in the past besides solid lead. How about a mercury or graphite wood bullet?
@marktwainisgod She is not in the line of fire. She is to his left at all times.And that includes her face which is to JFK's left at the 10 o'clock position.
@marktwainisgod if you were shot in the back of the neck then you would reflex that way. He reflexes to the front. There are good arguments from both sides. But I wouldn't trust our Government with 2 cents and they had BIG motives for killing him. What was LHO's motive?
@marktwainisgod Motive does not need to be shown in a murder case. But in the case of LHO he had written a letter to him brother Robert when he was in the Soviet Union. In the letter he said he would" kill any American who wore the uniform in defense of his country, Any American". That would include the Commander In Chief of the armed forces and that would be JFK.
@autoad um apparently you have never shot something in the head, bones and brains go everywhere just like a melon even from 100 yards. That still doesn't explain why his forehead or face wasn't blown off. BUT you are probably right, our Government loves us and would never lie to us.Just keep going to work and pay your taxes, stay drunk and penniless, life is good
@marktwainisgod It doesn't matter if the entire world shot something in the head..you still have ZERO forensic or medical or ballistic or physical evidence to support any of your kooky accusations.
@autoad Im not OFFERING forensic evidence. IM ASKING A QUESTION. If he was shot from the back then why is his face or forehead not blown off? Apparently this question is WAY over your head.
@autoad If you were shot in the back of the head, (high and to the right as you say), from Oswald's angle or anything close to it, the bullet would exit your FACE or the forehead or ANY place in the FRONT of the head. What you are claiming is the exact opposite. You have just supported my cause thank you.
@marktwainisgod You can claim any kind of victory you wish. The evidence is overwhelming the shots came from the 6th floor of the TSBD. All the forensic, medical, ballistic and physical evidence are in agreement as to the location and direction of the shots. This is one of the most analyzed and measured aspect of the assassination and after 50 years the conspiracy nuts have yet to produce a shred of credible evidence that casts doubt on the findings of the W/C and the HSCA. Case closed. Next!
@marktwainisgod The bullet fragmented and created that horrible exit wound to the upper right side of his head. The fragments found in the limo were all to the front of the vehicle and were matched ballistically to LHO's Mannlicher. The fragments too small to be identified ballistically were tested by Dr. Vincent Guinn using a neutron activation process. The rounds tested were a match to rounds made by the Western Cartridge Company which were brand of bullets LHO fired.
@autoad You are telling me that the bullet entered his upper backside but to the right and then changed direction and came out the upper right side from a shooter on the same right side?? You have violated about 3 of Newton's laws and my brain. You have never even shot a gun.
@marktwainisgod No!!! JFK was struck by 2 bullets that were fired from above and behind him. The first exited his throat (Loads of evidence to prove this) the second hit the back of his head and fragmented.
You are a conspiracy loon! You have no idea what happened in Dallas that day!! Why are you posting goofy stuff??
@marktwainisgod It's been clearly documented what happened to the bullet after it struck JFK. Are you learning about this for the first time? Perhaps YOU should stop watching CSI.
@autoad I can plainly see with my own 2 eyes that a shot from JFK's upper right rear is not going to exit the same side. What documentation are you talking about? The one that your Government gave you?
@marktwainisgod You clearly don't have any idea how a person reacts to being shot. Don't say "it's simple physics". It's not. In the case of bullets like the ones LHO fired (Full metal jacket rounds) they are designed to penetrate the target. A bullet does not transfer its energy to the target an that includes a human head attached to the body. If a blunt object strikes a target, the target will move. When a penetrating object strikes it travels through the target.
@autoad Our Government stands for truth and justice and they are right, no matter what. Just get back to work and keep paying your taxes, there's nothing to see here folks!
Autoad, The three I mentioned all opposed central banking, those whom have opposed the BIS cartel have encountered grave and severe consequences. Do you support central banking, fractional reserve lending? Dont answer a question with a question, this is avoidance, and you are presenting false evidence in an attempt to solidify your supposed supreme authority. JFKs death is not of an arbitrary designation. The Warren comm covered it up intentionally. Just like the 9/11 comm, wanton negligence
Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and John F Kennedy all supported the congressional power to issue currency in accordance with the constitution and they opposed central banking. All three suffered retaliation, two were assassinated and Jackson had an attempt on his life but both guns misfired or he would have suffered the same fate. This is not a coincidence. It is all the evidence I need, Ron Paul is following in their footsteps. We must have our sovereign liberty returned. RON PAUL 2012
@babybluesnowden What was the reason for the assassinations of Garfield and McKinley?
What were the reasons for the attempts on Teddy Roosevelt, Herbert Hoover, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford,Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr. Bill Clinton. George Bush the younger and Barack Obama?
Your example, as you've defined it, isn't a coincidence. But you neglected all the aforementioned names and now you have something less than a coincidence.
Nunhum army of pathologists will convenser me that a boy of 24 years, could in 4 seconds remanobrar fuizil after giving a shot, find a target of 15 cm to 90m ditancia moving shot and acetate, think it does not exist
If we think of planning a conspiracy, where you put the shooters? Well, the buildings on the fence, and especially on the viaduct at the end of str helm. We have the vision of the whole scenario, we have easy access to escape, the gunman would be out of touch with the public, it would be easy to be helped by an escort and could be no other shooter did, he would give the final shot, so I understand what happened! The fatal shot came from the overpass.
@joaoisobr What if nine forensic pathologists say there is no medical, physical, ballistic or forensic evidence the victim was shot from the front or side what happens to your theory?
@autoad if im a man in power high power and ur a lowly forensic doctor and i tell u, say this or ur dead, or ill put u in gitmo, or we'll kill ur family, or heres some money, not to mention iv had complete control of all the evidence to begin with and i already had doctors hackup and mutilate the victims face to show one thing n not another you;d shutup or take the money as would 99.9% of people. theres ur theory aswer right there
Do you have any evidence that says 9 forensic pathologists for the HSCA were threatened/bribed/intimidated by any outside organization or government entity?
The answer is no. You have no such evidence. Therefore all you have is a theory that is supported by nothing.
@autoad do u have any real evidence oswald shot kennedy other then the words of some government agents who very well prolly was in on the whole thing ? when 8 marksmen said the 3 shots couldnt be fired that fast and even the fastest shooter in the world saying this ? no so ur a sheep followin and eating everything ur told. i got a bridge in california for sale and a big pile of scrap metal in paris for sale wanna buy it ?
@grantdeshane "prolly in on the whole thing"..You're accusing some unnamed person from some unnamed part of the government of a crime.
Do you have any evidence that someone from the government was "in on the whole thing". Again, the answer is no. You have no evidence. All you're doing is making empty accusations. Frankly speaking, that's irresponsible.
@autoad like i said buddy ur a sheep, iraq has wmd's. the cia didnt help bin laden in the soviet afghan war, obama will pull the troops out soon as hes elected and wtc 7 just some how collapsed without prior knowledge when it was reported over 25 mins before it happens, its obvious oswald did not do this alone he could not do the shooting in the time they say, u close ur eyes to all the key evidence and only open them to things that suit ur theory. ur a close minded sheep
@grantdeshane the people running this show of homeland terror to scare there citizens into giving up their rights depend on people like u and until u open ur eyes and ask questions even if the answers arnt what u wanna hear then u will always be a sheep. just wait i bet u got a stockpile of guns and ammo and a bunker in ur backyard waiting for the reds to invade wait till the fbi etc comes aknocking saying sir u cant own guns anymore or that type of ammo then u will be on here 2cry
@grantdeshane What may be obvious to you clearly isn't obvious to the most people. Your examples are anecdotal and without any foundation of fact whatsoever. That's one of the major problem with the pro-conspiracy crowd. The "evidence" they cite isn't evidence but opinion.
@autoad lmao, if the people that are in on the plot are also the people in the positions to control the evidence what do u think happens to that evidence if theres something that implicates them ? duh, u need to open ur eyes to a broader view my friend theres alot going on under our noses and the simple minded follow the script the open minded ask questions, u obviously are simple minded cuz u swallowed the store that has many holes in it like a 2$ hooker since u have no questions
@grantdeshane It's been nearly 50 years since the assassination and to this day there's not one speck of evidence to support the accusation of a conspiracy. At some point a little common sense should be applied instead of relying on accusations as evidence.
@autoad Isn't that what the "lone nut" theorists do? Rely on accusations as evidence? I have not seen evidence that LHO was guilty. The only "evidence" presented was what the WC wrote. Some people have a different perspective than yours. We could both look at the Z-film and see totally different images and have different conclusions. But you are entitled to your opinions, of course.
@TheAmbassador11 The "evidence" the WC used came from standard law enforcement procedures of collecting and examining evidence and the examination of witnesses. It also came from forensic procedures to determine the direction, angle of the shots- the caliber of the bullets fired, the manufacturer of the bullets as well as ballistic tests to identify the weapon used to fire the bullets. All of the medical, physical, ballistic and forensic evidence says LHO did it and nobody else. If you want to
@TheAmbassador11 dismiss all the evidence collected to make this determination, that is your prerogative. However, to dismiss the evidence and suggest something nefarious took place, then you must have supporting evidence to back that claim. But remember that accusations of underhanded tactics needs to have supporting evidence. And accusations are not evidence.
@autoad Yes,I know that accusations are not evidence..LHO was accused of murdering J.Kneendy. I have not seen any evidence. The WC used limited resourses and discouned any indication that may have caused or allowed them to look elsewhere. Their conclusions were predetermined.
With the use of limited resources (according to you), the results of the Warren Report has stood the test of time. Dozens of different theories about the assassination have been proposed and each one of them crumbles into dust under the lightest of scrutiny.
@MiamiIndianTribe There's ZERO proof of the "government" killing JFK. The film in the box uses innuendo, supposition, rumor and guesses and pretends they're facts. They're not facts; they're opinions founded in conjecture. This film has 6 shots dubbed in. Another YouTuber has 7 dubbed into his film. You guys can't agree on the total number of shots, the number of gunman, their positioning, the weapons used, the caliber of the bullets, the motive and the people involved.
@autoad Check out a man called Perry Russo- To be honest- I'm not sure how man shots there was- from what I've read and from the many films on this subject my personal thought is anywhere from 1-6 shots- These things you mention have been brought up over the last nearly 50 years- You have to dig - you can't go into something like this with any political affiliation -He wasn't a Democrat or a Republican he was an American president and there needs to be an answer to these questions
@MiamiIndianTribe I'm very familiar with Perry Russo. He was the prime witness for Jim Garrison in the Clay Shaw trial. Garrison had Russo drugged and hypnotized in an attempt to get information out of him to help prosecute Clay Shaw. Russo failed multiple polygraph exams and he even told the examiner he had no recollection of Clay Shaw at the meeting with Oswald and Ferrie. Garrison put him on the stand anyway knowing Russo was going to lie to help convict Shaw. The trial was a sham.
@MiamiIndianTribe This film says shots came from behind the fence on the knoll. But, of the hundreds of people in Dealey Plaza, no one saw anyone shooting from the knoll or fence. No weapon was found on the knoll and no evidence of any shots fired from the fence. There's no ballistic, physical, medical or forensic evidence to support shots from the front or side.
@autoad There is more then 1 account of people seeing a shooter- Check out somthing on here called The men who killed Kennedy- it's lengthy but if you watch it from start to finish you will here accounts like this- one for example was from a deaf man who saw a shooter leaving the fence and taking apart a rifle-
@MiamiIndianTribe TMWKK is a flagrant propaganda piece filled with misinformation, fabrications, half-truths and outright lies. They've "enhanced" the Maryann Moorman photo that supposedly shows Badge Man by colorizing and adding a human figure to the picture. The Discovery Channel was sued by the Johnson family for their flagrant accusation of LBJ masterminding the assassination. TMWKK is trash and has no value whatsoever to serious JFK assassination students.
@MiamiIndianTribe I'd believe it if there was proof in the case of the JFK assassination. But there isn't any and it's foolish to insist the country killed him when there is ZERO evidence of the government being involved.
@autoad there is proof you just won't look into it without blowing it off- you can keep putting ZERO in caps all you want-it's called ballistics- if you've ever fired a weapon at so much as a tin can you'll know the difference between entry and exit
@autoad i think people are naive when they don't think their gov't can kill it's own people- your one of those people that doesnt think the feds can do any wrong-Jesus could come down and tell you he was hit from the front- You're just one of those that won't believe what this country has done to others
@MiamiIndianTribe If Ed Hoffman was such a terrific witness, why didn't Ed die a "mysterious death"? He lived to be 73 years of age and first told his "story" in 1967 (4 years after the assassination). That means he was 30 years old when he started spilling the beans about what he saw. That's 43 years of story telling. How did he manage not to get killed by the government who must have been upset with Ed and what he "witnessed"? Was Ed THAT smart in outwitting the government assassins? Please.
@MiamiIndianTribe another thought- Just to give you an example of things not making sense in this case from my view- Let's say that tonight someone breaks into your neighbors home- Beats him and his wife up- and steal the car. The police would write a report and when they caught the guy would have notes from the interragation right? Oswald is arrested and and questioned the evening of the 22'd and into the next day- no record of any of this- why?
@MiamiIndianTribe There was a record of the interrogation. The Assassination Records Review Board released the notes of Captain Fritz of the Dallas PD back in 1997.
Why are you presenting ancient, old misinformation?? The notes were released 15 years ago!
Stop reading that pro-conspiracy nonsense! Don't you realize the people who make up that stuff are trying to make a buck off people who are trusting and unsuspecting?
John Le Oswald konnte innerhalb von 8.3 sec durchaus 3 Schüße abgeben,
nach den neusten Untersuchungen in 2009, ob er einen Mitäter hatte ist bislang noch nicht bewiesen wurden, allerdings sind einige Dinge immer noch sehr
mißterious da ca. 50 Zeugen sagten Sie hörten auch Schüße von der Grasing
wall und ca. 10 Ärtzte bestätigen die Verletzung am Hinterkopf wären Eintrittswunden gewesen, außerdem fehlem immer noch einige Opptopsyphotos von JFK .
It is simple to prove the conspiracy.Between the second and third shots, LHO had to reload the weapon, find the head of JFK and shoot again, the time marked on the video zapruther between the second and third shots are 4 seconds in the video is a tangible proof. This maneuver like hitting the lottery. It is impossible for a boy of 24 years can do it. He missed the first shot to 20 feet without having to maneuve.It is impossible to reload a sniper rifle and a find a moving target in 4 seconds.
How could people not be struck by the earliest press statement's clear gesture of "a simple matter of a bullet righjt through the head" pointing at the right temple area exactly where the fatal shot came from the grassy knoll, as video evidence indicates. It's preposterous how the official story was able to take such a sharp turn from first statements! Did people just forget what they saw & heard? Also, it seems obvious the camera was panning over the knoll afterwards, seeking the gunman.
@willsirotak ..the complete press statement was not aired on all channels. The complete one that you mention with that statement of a bullet to the head was not aired on a couple of stations. I have seen that in a longer JFK documentary. Maybe they covered that up. Most people only saw the first part of the press statement.
RIP President Kennedy. You served your nation with HONOR and paid the ultimate price. We will never forget what the CIA and Pentagon scumbags did to you. We know the truth and we will fight them tooth and nail, regardless of how many Discovery Channel puff pieces and revisionist history books these animals continue to pump out.
erroneously called the snipers nest? witnesses 1 floor directly below heard shots from there. not saying it was or wasn't LHO, but pretty sure shots were fired from there
ruby says it himself "this whole thing wouldnt have happened if Adale Stevenson was the VP. This wasnt about a fake commie threat, civil rights or Castro. it was the fact that JFK wasnt a puppet, had his own $, he was dramatically changing the public discourse so far to the left that the early 60s were more liberal then today. it was also about money, power and to put a stop to Kennedy changes throughout the world. peace isnt profitable. its 2 hard 2 describe fully in 500 charts so ill stop now
@pat442389 ...peace is still not profitable today unfortunatly. If people knew what wars are actually about, they would stand up against it globally. It always was and is about money, power, oil or any other bullshit reason. War is an industry. I think that it is one of the reasons the US are in financial problems. War is good for nothing. Only innocent people die on both sides and loose and the corrupt ones win and get rich while others fight for them, JFK was a good man for peace.
I heard five shots and 3 and 4 are right on top of each other, which fact by itself means one bolt action rifle could not possibly have done all this. Wake up America. Wake up before it is really too late.
there was an element in this that thought jfk was a national security threat because of his percieved soft stance on the commies. the right wing had there flamethrowers out there calling every reform or east -west summit talks a commie plot. in the south hl hunt sponsored a radio show called lifeline which put out the commie takeover fear thing. alot these people were in the cia, political office, pentagon. they had paramilitary camps and mafia alliances. and they said a commie did it!
7:25 I heard 5 shots. Oswald was not only an excellent shot, shooting through a tree at a moving target, he was also a quick shot! Especially using that piece of crap Fucile di Fanteria rifle with the sight off! Shots 3 and 4 were less than a 1/2 second apart. He really cocked that fast! WOW! Lets hear it for the Lee Harvey Oswald the fastest and best shot in the east west north and south!
I can't believe they are still trying to say Oswald was a lone gun man!
One FBI agent, now retired, who worked the investigation and saw the Zapruder film up close,told me he counted 11 shots. First shot hit pavement in front of limo. 2nd shot hit JFK in throat. He was ordered by senior agents not to disagree with the WC theory. My guess is given the stakes for a miss or two, at least 4 shooters would be needed. LHO was a terrible shot, so no way he could have been one.
Op Northwoods does make you re-think all terror attacks on the USA and any CIA complicity or direct involvement.
bobzeda 16 hours ago
Comment removed
bobzeda 16 hours ago
Too much of what Howard Hunt said was bullshit, sorry. Ex-army nut Phillip J Corso wrote a bullshit book about aliens at Roswell - am I supposed to believe that too, now??
Zebonka 1 day ago
7:36
AloysiusAtJSP 2 days ago
I just love how the driver hears gun fires and slows down until the kill shot then speeds off, what the fuck.
AloysiusAtJSP 2 days ago
@AloysiusAtJSP
i can't help but to be overwhelmed with anger.
AloysiusAtJSP 2 days ago
Agreed...NO Doubt.
Markemark44 2 days ago
king kill 33 degrees ritual
haviturway1000 4 days ago
This guys know that they only have to hold their lies long enough for the public outcry to fade away.
Gutless AMERICANS, live in their Beer, TV and Shopping induced COMA.
THEY WILL DO NOTHING and the abusers will repeat over and over again, see 9-11. while they enslave USA with the Federal Reserve and the planet with the World Bank and the Intl Monetary Fund.
The CIA will destroy and suppress all evidence, while disclosure times (75 yrs) assure the guilty accomplices a long shameless lives.
RDELAPLAZA 4 days ago
The COVER UP by the CIA, FBI, SECRET SERVICE, the members of the WARREN COMMISSION: Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the US, John J. McCloy, President of the World Bank (1895-1989), Gerald Ford (R-MI), U.S. Representative (Bribed later with the 38th Presidency of the US),
PROVES THEIR IMPLICATION in the plot, ALSO a PROOF of a POWER ABOVE THE PRESIDENCY who decides WHO LIVES OR DIES.
Presidents are only puppets of this POWER, if they don't obey: JFK is the example.
RDELAPLAZA 4 days ago
"I'm a patsy!"
MrLimborace 5 days ago
Pretty sure that the "black dog man" is Gordon Arnold and that he falls down.
hybridmcgee 1 week ago
Also if all the footage of all the film and pictures that the government have, if they were released, we would have 100% proof, were the shot's came from, but, everyone knows were the shot's came from and possiable by who, it's about what the USA People and justice department will do about it, with current proof, but that will never happen. Confession's or not, only time it will it will rest, is when true justice and people responsable pay for it, only then it will stop.
7071t6 1 week ago
Have the Priest's been interviewed and what they have to say, also as we all know, the start of broadcast, no mention of the elm street route, crowd thing out, why, most of the person's there were put there to do 1 thing Kill JFK no matter what, also it's justice the people want and those responsable to pay for what they did, but that will never happen. PS: The Stemmon's sign removed with in days, why, due to bullet hole through it, also the windscreen on GC-000 or SS-100 X ?,+ 7.65 Mauser ?
7071t6 1 week ago
By 7:34 I can hear 5 shots on this film, then they say 4, later they say 3, were there echos? Is the sound to this real or made up later? Since you can hear 5 shots why doesn't the film talk about that? Isn't it possible that the neck wound could be on exit? It's incomprehensible that such a poor autopsy was done. A case could be made for exhumation to repeat the autopsy at present times.
sidharthafocus 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MJ-12 asasinated President Kennedy when he informed them that he was going to tell the public all the facts of the alien presence. He was killed by the Secret Service agent driving his car and it is plainly visible in the film held from public view.
GIMOZARDO 2 weeks ago
that's real power when you can take out the most important man on the planet at the time and not be held accountable dam oswald was a patriot the covert operation of disinformation is still in effect the war goes on the rules of engagenment have changed rip JFK
phineazz273 2 weeks ago
For several years I resisted believing JFK had authorized a covert Cuban destabilization/coup operation run by his brother Jack as US Attorney General, a deep-cover parallel to FBI's Operation 40 & CIA's Operation Mongoose. But the more I've read I suspect White House's anti-Castro operation assets & planning were coopted by Deep State principle's & used against JFK himself, making gov. complicit in helping to cover-up conspiracy to limit fallout that would damage the office & JFK's legacy..
starmanskye 2 weeks ago
You gotta vote though. The game may be rigged but you can still win if you get really, really lucky. If everybody in this country voted against the military industrial complex then they would be forced into submission. They thrive on our apathy and ignorance. Now they may try to rig the election if they lose or assassinate whomever wins that they don't want, but at least the ball will be in their court. If they pull more shit like that somebody will know and expose it like they did with Kennedy.
rustyschackleford100 3 weeks ago
it was a very sucessful coup. they are still in absoult contol. stupid voters think they are still voting
datzfast 3 weeks ago
how come the crowd numbers drop to practacally zero at the head shot location
datzfast 3 weeks ago
Who cares where the shooter was.....with E Howard Hunts conffession, it is confirmed what we all already knew. America experienced a coup in 1963. LBJ, Hoover, CIA and military guys, were all complicite....plain and simple. And the Mainstream media, says, why hasn't the plot leaked in all these years, well it has, and they do nothing, just blame Oswald.
Sept11Discovery 4 weeks ago 5
@Sept11Discovery
I don't think Hoover was part of a coup or had DIRECT knowledge when or if it would occur. I would consider him guilty of complicity after the fact.
bobzeda 16 hours ago
KENNEDY LEFT THE SECRET SERVICE ACCORDING TO THIS NARRATION
THESE GUYS WERE PROFESSIONALS, WOULD THEY USE A STORM DRAIN?
VNNJHV 4 weeks ago
Unfortunately doesn't mention the killer head-shot made from the storm drain, below street level, to the right front of JFK limo. Also doesn't mention Dr. James Fetzer's important ongoing work, including his 2003 symposium which shows major advances in science to back up what we already know - JFK was killed by conspiracy.
33rdPatriot 4 weeks ago
I DON'T KNOW WHY ALL YOU PEOPLE ARE STILL DEBATING THIS!!! JFK WAS UNQUESTIONABLY, UNDENIABLY, ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A FUCKING DOUBT KILLED BY HIS OWN GOVERNMENT, THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, MY GOVERNMENT... All the proof has been written down and put in books over these many years by the many EXTREMELY IMPORTANT people that had EVERYTHING to do with it.. It's not a question and anyone who disputes it is only shinning a spot light on their own unfamiliarity with the subject...
seanzoz 1 month ago 6
@seanzoz YOU COULDN'T HAVE SAID IT ANY BETTER. IF MY COUNTRY CAN'T KILL ANOTHER HUMAN, THEY WILL START KILLING BRICKS. THE DNA OF THE USA IS HORRIFIC
spowell2166 4 weeks ago in playlist imko
@seanzoz YEP YEP!! Agreed.NO Doubt. Can WE TRUST?
Markemark44 2 days ago
I had some Nyquil the other night that did the same thing to me. My head just went back and to the left
seanzoz 1 month ago
@seanzoz LMFAO THATS DAMN GOOD ... ON THE LEVEL OF CLASSIC
spowell2166 4 weeks ago in playlist imko
I have to read the warren report in the morning- peace for now
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
No because you're not old enought- see that's your thinking- some one presents evidence contrary to what you've grown up thinking and you straight away blow it off
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
That's why you'll never look into anything different then what they teach you- I was a registered Democrat for nearly 20 years and left the party because I was tired of being told what to think- and what i thought was right wasn't right all the time- but I believed in that party line for years- just an example of changing the way you see thin
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
AE911Truth Experts Speak Out
marcoestevesdmc 1 month ago
Oswald was framed.
TheAmbassador11 1 month ago
How can anyone deny the evidence after watching this?
andreasegde 1 month ago
@ autoad what the hell you watching more importantly were you get your misinformation
dannielle10517 1 month ago
@autoad they didnt find no fragments in that car if they did they could have done those test you talking about where you get those crappy facts from lho was a patsy why you think they kiled him
dannielle10517 1 month ago
Do you people have watched Shooters movies? Well i think it similiar with what happens to Oswald, but the differences Oswald not Hollywood actor so he he had bad ending....
pastlearner 1 month ago
autoad, your comments are so patronizing to everyone. And you do not know more than all of the witnesses, doctors, scientists, policemen, FBI agents, CIA agents and many others who have provided overwhelming evidence of multiple gunmen and conspiracy. Your comments are not only insulting to the intelligence, they are demeaning to the memory of the people who have died because of this conspiracy.
TheLensSolution 2 months ago
@TheLensSolution
What doctors, scientists, policeman, FBI agents, CIA agents provided overwhelming evidence of multiple gunman and conspiracy? Who?
What was the "overwhelming evidence"?
autoad 1 month ago
An observation: There are five "dubbed in" shots. Two shots struck the president and five were fired. Don't you think the people who supposedly put the conspiracy together and hired the gunmen to shoot the president would have selected people who could shoot better? Two out of five shots is 40% accuracy. That's terrible!
Oswald was a better shot than these "world class" gunman when he fired at a rapid rate. He hit the target 96% and 98% from 200 yards. All this talk of "conspiracy is bunk!
autoad 2 months ago
Our Government stands for truth and justice and they are right, no matter what. Just get back to work and keep paying your taxes, there's nothing to see here folks!
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
Police officers? Where? On motorcycles sure but not in the crowd.
bucknorm 2 months ago
Another disinfo/shill exposed. USS Maine, Lusitania, Mohammed Mossadegh (operation ajax), Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, Jaime Roldos, Salvador Allende, Omar Torrijos, Watergate, Keating 5 S&L scandal, Iran Contra, Theres a list of covert ops for you to debunk. It never ends, play your disinfo game elsewhere. I challenge your credibilty, If im a conspiracy theorist that makes you a coincidence theorist. History wil lnot absolve us, do you want your children to live in tyranny?
babybluesnowden 2 months ago
@babybluesnowden i been tryna point this type of thing out to autodad but hes got an automind automatically agree's with whatever the government tells him, simple minded people are who these criminals depend on cuz they swallow the hole load like a cheap hooker, people like us ask questions where questions should be asked, point out discrepencys where they are obvious and arnt close minded, im canadian and i agree 100% with all you've said and ron paul is our only hope
grantdeshane 2 months ago
@grantdeshane if we leave it to the tyrants we have in power in the spotight and behind the spotlight our world is doom'd well they are safe in their football stadium sized bunkers, ron paul is this worlds only hope of getting back on the right track and the right moral and ethical views of how a world and government should be run, if the founding fathers was alive today and seen this garbage they wouldnt be assassinated theyd fukin kill themselves
grantdeshane 2 months ago
@grantdeshane There are dozens of different theories associated with the assassination.
Which one is the correct one? All of them cannot be correct at the same time.
autoad 2 months ago
@grantdeshane There's something you should know about what I believe and don't. Many years ago I was convinced there was a conspiracy behind the assassination. Not anymore. Logic, reasoning and a willingness to challenge my own beliefs about what happened in Dallas to hold. My change didn't take happen overnight. The conspiracy theories are interesting, but there's no evidence to support them.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad I agree with you except for one thing, there is no way that the bullets came from Oswald's direction and distance. Also the frequencies of shots are too close together for a bolt action hunting rifle with a scope. With this rifle he could have only got one accurate shot off in the time that we see on the film. The scope alone makes it too hard to make a quick re-load, aim, fire, let alone 4 shots. This was multiple assassins.
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod Hate to disagree with you but we have to look at what we know is true;
1. JFK was struck by two bullets fired from above and behind.
2. The "magic bullet" has been matched ballistically to LHO's Mannlicher to the exclusion of all other rifles.
3. The bullet fragments found in the limo were forward of JFK and they were ballistically/chemically matched to LHO's Mannlicher and bullets he fired.
4. LHO scored 48/50 and 49/50 rapid fire at 200 yards while in the USMC
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad These are not facts. This is what you were told.
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod And what does that mean?
Told by whom?
I suppose you're going to say that you have the facts and everyone else doesn't.
(More goofiness from the CL's.)
autoad 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod
5.The 3 shot was fired at 88 yards. That is well within his range of proficiency.
6. A Mannlicher bolt action can be fired at very high rate. Here on YouTube you can see six shots fired in 5.1 seconds from a Mannlicher with accuracy. LHO fired 3 in slightly more that 8 seconds.
7. There is no medical, physical, ballistic or forensic evidence to support shots fired from the front or side of JFK.
Sorry, there's no evidence of anyone other than LHO shooting JFK.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad I can PLAINLY see that the shot is coming from the front. His brains splatter to the back. and why would he be grabbing the front of his neck?
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod Scientific analysis of the Z-film shows the particulate matter from the head shot moving forward. A frontal shot would have produced the following;
1. An exit wound to the right rear of his head
2. A high probability of Jackie being struck by the exiting bullet and/or bullet fragments and/or particulate matter.
3. A head-on frontal shot would create an exit wound to the back of his head and the particulate matter would have covered the trunk and/or the follow-up SS vehicle.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad Jackie was in the line of fire for LHO. So was the driver. A shot from the upper rear would have blown JFK's forehead or face off. The autopsy pictures show the exit to the back/right. The military also has used many different kinds of bullets in the past besides solid lead. How about a mercury or graphite wood bullet?
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod And you haven't one speck of evidence to support this theory.
autoad 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod Jackie was not in the line of fire! She was off to the left of JFK!! What the hell are you talking about???
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad when he is shot in the head she is holding him, right in LHO's line of fire.
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod She is not in the line of fire. She is to his left at all times.And that includes her face which is to JFK's left at the 10 o'clock position.
autoad 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod if you were shot in the back of the neck then you would reflex that way. He reflexes to the front. There are good arguments from both sides. But I wouldn't trust our Government with 2 cents and they had BIG motives for killing him. What was LHO's motive?
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod Motive does not need to be shown in a murder case. But in the case of LHO he had written a letter to him brother Robert when he was in the Soviet Union. In the letter he said he would" kill any American who wore the uniform in defense of his country, Any American". That would include the Commander In Chief of the armed forces and that would be JFK.
autoad 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod
4. The exiting bullet or bullet fragments exiting the back of his head would have stuck the SS agents and /or the follow up car.
If the shot came from the front, how did John and Nellie Connally and Agents Greer and Kellerman get covered with particulate matter?
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad well anytime I have to shoot a deer or a cow at point blank, I get splattered with blood even though the bullet is traveling away from me.
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod and regardless, if he was shot from the back, his forehead or face would have been blown off.
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod Blood splatter at close range -yes. And it's minimal.
Bone, brain and tissue NO. That doesn't happen.
You theory is unsupportable. You have ZERO data to back it up.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad um apparently you have never shot something in the head, bones and brains go everywhere just like a melon even from 100 yards. That still doesn't explain why his forehead or face wasn't blown off. BUT you are probably right, our Government loves us and would never lie to us.Just keep going to work and pay your taxes, stay drunk and penniless, life is good
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod It doesn't matter if the entire world shot something in the head..you still have ZERO forensic or medical or ballistic or physical evidence to support any of your kooky accusations.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad Im not OFFERING forensic evidence. IM ASKING A QUESTION. If he was shot from the back then why is his face or forehead not blown off? Apparently this question is WAY over your head.
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod The reason his face and forehead were not blown off because of the following;
1. He was slumped forward and leaning to the left.
2. Elm Street has a 4 degree slope away from the TSBD
4. The bullet struck JFK's head high and just to the right of center.
I hope this answers your question.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad If you were shot in the back of the head, (high and to the right as you say), from Oswald's angle or anything close to it, the bullet would exit your FACE or the forehead or ANY place in the FRONT of the head. What you are claiming is the exact opposite. You have just supported my cause thank you.
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod You can claim any kind of victory you wish. The evidence is overwhelming the shots came from the 6th floor of the TSBD. All the forensic, medical, ballistic and physical evidence are in agreement as to the location and direction of the shots. This is one of the most analyzed and measured aspect of the assassination and after 50 years the conspiracy nuts have yet to produce a shred of credible evidence that casts doubt on the findings of the W/C and the HSCA. Case closed. Next!
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad So WHERE did the bullet exit? Since you are soooooo brainwashed by CSI WHERE did the bullet EXIT??????
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod The bullet fragmented and created that horrible exit wound to the upper right side of his head. The fragments found in the limo were all to the front of the vehicle and were matched ballistically to LHO's Mannlicher. The fragments too small to be identified ballistically were tested by Dr. Vincent Guinn using a neutron activation process. The rounds tested were a match to rounds made by the Western Cartridge Company which were brand of bullets LHO fired.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad You are telling me that the bullet entered his upper backside but to the right and then changed direction and came out the upper right side from a shooter on the same right side?? You have violated about 3 of Newton's laws and my brain. You have never even shot a gun.
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod No!!! JFK was struck by 2 bullets that were fired from above and behind him. The first exited his throat (Loads of evidence to prove this) the second hit the back of his head and fragmented.
You are a conspiracy loon! You have no idea what happened in Dallas that day!! Why are you posting goofy stuff??
autoad 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod It's been clearly documented what happened to the bullet after it struck JFK. Are you learning about this for the first time? Perhaps YOU should stop watching CSI.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad I can plainly see with my own 2 eyes that a shot from JFK's upper right rear is not going to exit the same side. What documentation are you talking about? The one that your Government gave you?
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
Comment removed
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
@marktwainisgod You clearly don't have any idea how a person reacts to being shot. Don't say "it's simple physics". It's not. In the case of bullets like the ones LHO fired (Full metal jacket rounds) they are designed to penetrate the target. A bullet does not transfer its energy to the target an that includes a human head attached to the body. If a blunt object strikes a target, the target will move. When a penetrating object strikes it travels through the target.
autoad 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@autoad Our Government stands for truth and justice and they are right, no matter what. Just get back to work and keep paying your taxes, there's nothing to see here folks!
marktwainisgod 2 months ago
Autoad, The three I mentioned all opposed central banking, those whom have opposed the BIS cartel have encountered grave and severe consequences. Do you support central banking, fractional reserve lending? Dont answer a question with a question, this is avoidance, and you are presenting false evidence in an attempt to solidify your supposed supreme authority. JFKs death is not of an arbitrary designation. The Warren comm covered it up intentionally. Just like the 9/11 comm, wanton negligence
babybluesnowden 2 months ago
Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln and John F Kennedy all supported the congressional power to issue currency in accordance with the constitution and they opposed central banking. All three suffered retaliation, two were assassinated and Jackson had an attempt on his life but both guns misfired or he would have suffered the same fate. This is not a coincidence. It is all the evidence I need, Ron Paul is following in their footsteps. We must have our sovereign liberty returned. RON PAUL 2012
babybluesnowden 2 months ago
@babybluesnowden What was the reason for the assassinations of Garfield and McKinley?
What were the reasons for the attempts on Teddy Roosevelt, Herbert Hoover, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford,Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr. Bill Clinton. George Bush the younger and Barack Obama?
Your example, as you've defined it, isn't a coincidence. But you neglected all the aforementioned names and now you have something less than a coincidence.
autoad 2 months ago
Nunhum army of pathologists will convenser me that a boy of 24 years, could in 4 seconds remanobrar fuizil after giving a shot, find a target of 15 cm to 90m ditancia moving shot and acetate, think it does not exist
joaoisobr 2 months ago
If we think of planning a conspiracy, where you put the shooters? Well, the buildings on the fence, and especially on the viaduct at the end of str helm. We have the vision of the whole scenario, we have easy access to escape, the gunman would be out of touch with the public, it would be easy to be helped by an escort and could be no other shooter did, he would give the final shot, so I understand what happened! The fatal shot came from the overpass.
joaoisobr 2 months ago
@joaoisobr What if nine forensic pathologists say there is no medical, physical, ballistic or forensic evidence the victim was shot from the front or side what happens to your theory?
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad if im a man in power high power and ur a lowly forensic doctor and i tell u, say this or ur dead, or ill put u in gitmo, or we'll kill ur family, or heres some money, not to mention iv had complete control of all the evidence to begin with and i already had doctors hackup and mutilate the victims face to show one thing n not another you;d shutup or take the money as would 99.9% of people. theres ur theory aswer right there
grantdeshane 2 months ago
@grantdeshane You said the key word; "theory".
Do you have any evidence that says 9 forensic pathologists for the HSCA were threatened/bribed/intimidated by any outside organization or government entity?
The answer is no. You have no such evidence. Therefore all you have is a theory that is supported by nothing.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad Actually, the fact that it is founded upon no evidence strips his right from calling it a theory at all.
tehmaninblack 2 months ago
@tehmaninblack You are correct.
I was being generous calling it a theory because its the Holidays.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad do u have any real evidence oswald shot kennedy other then the words of some government agents who very well prolly was in on the whole thing ? when 8 marksmen said the 3 shots couldnt be fired that fast and even the fastest shooter in the world saying this ? no so ur a sheep followin and eating everything ur told. i got a bridge in california for sale and a big pile of scrap metal in paris for sale wanna buy it ?
grantdeshane 2 months ago
@grantdeshane "prolly in on the whole thing"..You're accusing some unnamed person from some unnamed part of the government of a crime.
Do you have any evidence that someone from the government was "in on the whole thing". Again, the answer is no. You have no evidence. All you're doing is making empty accusations. Frankly speaking, that's irresponsible.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad like i said buddy ur a sheep, iraq has wmd's. the cia didnt help bin laden in the soviet afghan war, obama will pull the troops out soon as hes elected and wtc 7 just some how collapsed without prior knowledge when it was reported over 25 mins before it happens, its obvious oswald did not do this alone he could not do the shooting in the time they say, u close ur eyes to all the key evidence and only open them to things that suit ur theory. ur a close minded sheep
grantdeshane 2 months ago
@grantdeshane the people running this show of homeland terror to scare there citizens into giving up their rights depend on people like u and until u open ur eyes and ask questions even if the answers arnt what u wanna hear then u will always be a sheep. just wait i bet u got a stockpile of guns and ammo and a bunker in ur backyard waiting for the reds to invade wait till the fbi etc comes aknocking saying sir u cant own guns anymore or that type of ammo then u will be on here 2cry
grantdeshane 2 months ago
@grantdeshane What may be obvious to you clearly isn't obvious to the most people. Your examples are anecdotal and without any foundation of fact whatsoever. That's one of the major problem with the pro-conspiracy crowd. The "evidence" they cite isn't evidence but opinion.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad lmao, if the people that are in on the plot are also the people in the positions to control the evidence what do u think happens to that evidence if theres something that implicates them ? duh, u need to open ur eyes to a broader view my friend theres alot going on under our noses and the simple minded follow the script the open minded ask questions, u obviously are simple minded cuz u swallowed the store that has many holes in it like a 2$ hooker since u have no questions
grantdeshane 2 months ago
@grantdeshane It's been nearly 50 years since the assassination and to this day there's not one speck of evidence to support the accusation of a conspiracy. At some point a little common sense should be applied instead of relying on accusations as evidence.
autoad 2 months ago
@autoad Isn't that what the "lone nut" theorists do? Rely on accusations as evidence? I have not seen evidence that LHO was guilty. The only "evidence" presented was what the WC wrote. Some people have a different perspective than yours. We could both look at the Z-film and see totally different images and have different conclusions. But you are entitled to your opinions, of course.
TheAmbassador11 1 month ago
@TheAmbassador11 The "evidence" the WC used came from standard law enforcement procedures of collecting and examining evidence and the examination of witnesses. It also came from forensic procedures to determine the direction, angle of the shots- the caliber of the bullets fired, the manufacturer of the bullets as well as ballistic tests to identify the weapon used to fire the bullets. All of the medical, physical, ballistic and forensic evidence says LHO did it and nobody else. If you want to
autoad 1 month ago
@TheAmbassador11 dismiss all the evidence collected to make this determination, that is your prerogative. However, to dismiss the evidence and suggest something nefarious took place, then you must have supporting evidence to back that claim. But remember that accusations of underhanded tactics needs to have supporting evidence. And accusations are not evidence.
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad Yes,I know that accusations are not evidence..LHO was accused of murdering J.Kneendy. I have not seen any evidence. The WC used limited resourses and discouned any indication that may have caused or allowed them to look elsewhere. Their conclusions were predetermined.
TheAmbassador11 1 month ago
@TheAmbassador11
With the use of limited resources (according to you), the results of the Warren Report has stood the test of time. Dozens of different theories about the assassination have been proposed and each one of them crumbles into dust under the lightest of scrutiny.
autoad 1 month ago
@TheAmbassador11 And by the way...all you did was make another accusation that's not supported by any evidence whatsoever.
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad are you not watching the film above in the box? what proof do you people need- your gov't kills it's own- why can't you see that
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe There's ZERO proof of the "government" killing JFK. The film in the box uses innuendo, supposition, rumor and guesses and pretends they're facts. They're not facts; they're opinions founded in conjecture. This film has 6 shots dubbed in. Another YouTuber has 7 dubbed into his film. You guys can't agree on the total number of shots, the number of gunman, their positioning, the weapons used, the caliber of the bullets, the motive and the people involved.
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad Check out a man called Perry Russo- To be honest- I'm not sure how man shots there was- from what I've read and from the many films on this subject my personal thought is anywhere from 1-6 shots- These things you mention have been brought up over the last nearly 50 years- You have to dig - you can't go into something like this with any political affiliation -He wasn't a Democrat or a Republican he was an American president and there needs to be an answer to these questions
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe I'm very familiar with Perry Russo. He was the prime witness for Jim Garrison in the Clay Shaw trial. Garrison had Russo drugged and hypnotized in an attempt to get information out of him to help prosecute Clay Shaw. Russo failed multiple polygraph exams and he even told the examiner he had no recollection of Clay Shaw at the meeting with Oswald and Ferrie. Garrison put him on the stand anyway knowing Russo was going to lie to help convict Shaw. The trial was a sham.
autoad 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe This film says shots came from behind the fence on the knoll. But, of the hundreds of people in Dealey Plaza, no one saw anyone shooting from the knoll or fence. No weapon was found on the knoll and no evidence of any shots fired from the fence. There's no ballistic, physical, medical or forensic evidence to support shots from the front or side.
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad There is more then 1 account of people seeing a shooter- Check out somthing on here called The men who killed Kennedy- it's lengthy but if you watch it from start to finish you will here accounts like this- one for example was from a deaf man who saw a shooter leaving the fence and taking apart a rifle-
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe TMWKK is a flagrant propaganda piece filled with misinformation, fabrications, half-truths and outright lies. They've "enhanced" the Maryann Moorman photo that supposedly shows Badge Man by colorizing and adding a human figure to the picture. The Discovery Channel was sued by the Johnson family for their flagrant accusation of LBJ masterminding the assassination. TMWKK is trash and has no value whatsoever to serious JFK assassination students.
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad Clay shaw was part of a group that was kicked out of Italy for spying
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe You're speaking about Ed Hoffman who had told three to four different versions to the FBI over the past two decades.
Which version of his story should I be considering?
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad I guess you should believe Allen spector's theory the most I suppose- you dont think our country kills people do you?
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe I'd believe it if there was proof in the case of the JFK assassination. But there isn't any and it's foolish to insist the country killed him when there is ZERO evidence of the government being involved.
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad there is proof you just won't look into it without blowing it off- you can keep putting ZERO in caps all you want-it's called ballistics- if you've ever fired a weapon at so much as a tin can you'll know the difference between entry and exit
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe You never answered my question;
If I told my son and made a recording that I was involved in the assassination of JFK would you believe it?
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad You do know howard hunt told his sone st john he was involved don't you
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe If I told my son I was involved in the assassination and made a recording would you believe that too?
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad i think people are naive when they don't think their gov't can kill it's own people- your one of those people that doesnt think the feds can do any wrong-Jesus could come down and tell you he was hit from the front- You're just one of those that won't believe what this country has done to others
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe I think people who buy the pro-conpiracy crap are suckers and deserve to have their money extracted from their purses and wallets.
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad I don't buy anything- Tell the CIA to release the atuopsy photos it still has hidden away after 49 years- if Oswald was such a great sniper
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe And how do you know they have autopsy photos hidden away?
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad In the early 90's they had congressional hearings to discuss releasing records- they withheld them -
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe Can you be more specific with the name of the committee and when they met. I want to read the report for myself.
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad JFK Assassination files- House Gov't Oss subcmte- They met in January of 92
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@autoad and Ed Hoffman is deaf he couldn't have told anybody anything
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe If Ed Hoffman was such a terrific witness, why didn't Ed die a "mysterious death"? He lived to be 73 years of age and first told his "story" in 1967 (4 years after the assassination). That means he was 30 years old when he started spilling the beans about what he saw. That's 43 years of story telling. How did he manage not to get killed by the government who must have been upset with Ed and what he "witnessed"? Was Ed THAT smart in outwitting the government assassins? Please.
autoad 1 month ago
@autoad you didnt watch howard hunt's confession of "the big event" did you?
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe Keep up the research. Read both sides of the murder, ( including the "pro-conspiracy nonsense") You're on the right track.
TheAmbassador11 1 month ago
@TheAmbassador11 oh and the forensic evience too-
MiamiIndianTribe 4 weeks ago
@autoad I have to go to sleep for now- Look up Howard Hunt's confession video on here -Peace
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe another thought- Just to give you an example of things not making sense in this case from my view- Let's say that tonight someone breaks into your neighbors home- Beats him and his wife up- and steal the car. The police would write a report and when they caught the guy would have notes from the interragation right? Oswald is arrested and and questioned the evening of the 22'd and into the next day- no record of any of this- why?
MiamiIndianTribe 1 month ago
@MiamiIndianTribe There was a record of the interrogation. The Assassination Records Review Board released the notes of Captain Fritz of the Dallas PD back in 1997.
Why are you presenting ancient, old misinformation?? The notes were released 15 years ago!
Stop reading that pro-conspiracy nonsense! Don't you realize the people who make up that stuff are trying to make a buck off people who are trusting and unsuspecting?
autoad 1 month ago
John Le Oswald konnte innerhalb von 8.3 sec durchaus 3 Schüße abgeben,
nach den neusten Untersuchungen in 2009, ob er einen Mitäter hatte ist bislang noch nicht bewiesen wurden, allerdings sind einige Dinge immer noch sehr
mißterious da ca. 50 Zeugen sagten Sie hörten auch Schüße von der Grasing
wall und ca. 10 Ärtzte bestätigen die Verletzung am Hinterkopf wären Eintrittswunden gewesen, außerdem fehlem immer noch einige Opptopsyphotos von JFK .
sagritarius01 3 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
@sagritarius01 ..Seine nahme war Lee Harvey Oswald, nicht John.
ricotermonen 2 months ago
It is simple to prove the conspiracy.Between the second and third shots, LHO had to reload the weapon, find the head of JFK and shoot again, the time marked on the video zapruther between the second and third shots are 4 seconds in the video is a tangible proof. This maneuver like hitting the lottery. It is impossible for a boy of 24 years can do it. He missed the first shot to 20 feet without having to maneuve.It is impossible to reload a sniper rifle and a find a moving target in 4 seconds.
joaoisobr 3 months ago 2
@joaoisobr The "JFK Assassination" episode of Jesse Ventura's show "Conspiracy Theory" proves what you said.
JTruth2010 2 months ago
@joaoisobr Not true.It can be done easily.
autoad 2 months ago
The banks did it, look up John j Mcloy.
kevlarunderware 3 months ago
How could people not be struck by the earliest press statement's clear gesture of "a simple matter of a bullet righjt through the head" pointing at the right temple area exactly where the fatal shot came from the grassy knoll, as video evidence indicates. It's preposterous how the official story was able to take such a sharp turn from first statements! Did people just forget what they saw & heard? Also, it seems obvious the camera was panning over the knoll afterwards, seeking the gunman.
willsirotak 3 months ago
@willsirotak ..the complete press statement was not aired on all channels. The complete one that you mention with that statement of a bullet to the head was not aired on a couple of stations. I have seen that in a longer JFK documentary. Maybe they covered that up. Most people only saw the first part of the press statement.
ricotermonen 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RIP President Kennedy. You served your nation with HONOR and paid the ultimate price. We will never forget what the CIA and Pentagon scumbags did to you. We know the truth and we will fight them tooth and nail, regardless of how many Discovery Channel puff pieces and revisionist history books these animals continue to pump out.
LongLiveOx 3 months ago
PMnews1 ya do know the Z film which you are watching does NOT have sound right? the "shots" you heard are dubbed for this video
RedStateRoy 3 months ago
erroneously called the snipers nest? witnesses 1 floor directly below heard shots from there. not saying it was or wasn't LHO, but pretty sure shots were fired from there
RedStateRoy 3 months ago
ruby says it himself "this whole thing wouldnt have happened if Adale Stevenson was the VP. This wasnt about a fake commie threat, civil rights or Castro. it was the fact that JFK wasnt a puppet, had his own $, he was dramatically changing the public discourse so far to the left that the early 60s were more liberal then today. it was also about money, power and to put a stop to Kennedy changes throughout the world. peace isnt profitable. its 2 hard 2 describe fully in 500 charts so ill stop now
pat442389 3 months ago
@pat442389 ...peace is still not profitable today unfortunatly. If people knew what wars are actually about, they would stand up against it globally. It always was and is about money, power, oil or any other bullshit reason. War is an industry. I think that it is one of the reasons the US are in financial problems. War is good for nothing. Only innocent people die on both sides and loose and the corrupt ones win and get rich while others fight for them, JFK was a good man for peace.
ricotermonen 2 months ago
@ricotermonen very astute point as evidenced by haliburton and the 'cheney adminstration".
mad4you1000 2 months ago
I cound five shots in 8-9 seconds, which is impossible for Lee Harvey Oswald with that bolt action rifle he had. Nixonw as right. This is a hoax.
Boelcke1919 4 months ago
Richard Nixon said the Warren Commission Report was the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people. Think about it.
Boelcke1919 4 months ago
@Boelcke1919 Nixon never said that. Attributing that statement to him is an absolute falsehood.
LoneNutter1 3 months ago
I heard five shots and 3 and 4 are right on top of each other, which fact by itself means one bolt action rifle could not possibly have done all this. Wake up America. Wake up before it is really too late.
Boelcke1919 4 months ago
Comment removed
TheTITTTTYYinspector 5 months ago
those arent the real shots i dont think. u wouldnt be able to hear the shells hit the floor after the shots....
junky9 5 months ago
Well that was an intresting film , i guess we will find out the truth sometime in the year 2197
aaron1976leeds 5 months ago
there was an element in this that thought jfk was a national security threat because of his percieved soft stance on the commies. the right wing had there flamethrowers out there calling every reform or east -west summit talks a commie plot. in the south hl hunt sponsored a radio show called lifeline which put out the commie takeover fear thing. alot these people were in the cia, political office, pentagon. they had paramilitary camps and mafia alliances. and they said a commie did it!
larrywheels 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This Evil LBJ statement I believe refers to the murder of JFK
"It is the Melancholy law of human societies to be compeled sometimes to chose a great evil in order to ward off a greater evil"
cruisersism 5 months ago
7:25 I heard 5 shots. Oswald was not only an excellent shot, shooting through a tree at a moving target, he was also a quick shot! Especially using that piece of crap Fucile di Fanteria rifle with the sight off! Shots 3 and 4 were less than a 1/2 second apart. He really cocked that fast! WOW! Lets hear it for the Lee Harvey Oswald the fastest and best shot in the east west north and south!
I can't believe they are still trying to say Oswald was a lone gun man!
PMnews1 6 months ago
the total action makes me to ask why? who is taking over and with what price?
artbiz45 6 months ago
Hold up I thought he was killed by the Mob.
Totalpckge 6 months ago
@Totalpckge They say that the mob (Jack Ruby) killed Lee Oswald.
Hoonozit 5 months ago
One FBI agent, now retired, who worked the investigation and saw the Zapruder film up close,told me he counted 11 shots. First shot hit pavement in front of limo. 2nd shot hit JFK in throat. He was ordered by senior agents not to disagree with the WC theory. My guess is given the stakes for a miss or two, at least 4 shooters would be needed. LHO was a terrible shot, so no way he could have been one.
390bullitt1968 7 months ago
Thanks for the film, what is it called? Its too obvious Jfk was shot from the front, making two shooters.
GrizzlyFist 10 months ago
@GrizzlyFist t