"Could their knowledge have come from extra terrestrial sources." Only if someone was paid off to destroy our Earth. Space exploration costs us our tectonic plates when launching pads for space shuttles have 6 to 9 SBR's (Shuttle Booster Rockets) that kick each well made launch pad by 2.8 million pounds PER SQUARE FOOT, not even by 2.8 million pounds per square feet which would spread the pressure a bit. And no one cares.
1: What most ppl dont think about is that they cant know how old these ancient sites are or when they where built cause only organic remnants of once-living organisms can be carbon dated because the C-14 that is tested for is replenished in the organisms while they are alive. But once they die, it is no longer replenished and the C-14 decays. By measuring the amount of decay, the age can be determined. So, no, you can't Carbon date stone.
Most of the evidence that Von Daniken relies on is easily explained. Instead of citing every piece of evidence that vaguely suports his theories he should concentrate only on the small quantity of that which cannot. Skeptics need only debunk the weakest evidence to discredit a theory. By dumping that weakest evidence the theory is strengthened and becomes more credible and less easily debunked. This is his error, not the concept itself.
"Could their knowledge have come from extra terrestrial sources." Only if someone was paid off to destroy our Earth. Space exploration costs us our tectonic plates when launching pads for space shuttles have 6 to 9 SBR's (Shuttle Booster Rockets) that kick each well made launch pad by 2.8 million pounds PER SQUARE FOOT, not even by 2.8 million pounds per square feet which would spread the pressure a bit. And no one cares.
dr33mweav 5 months ago
Quetzalcoatl was not HUMAN! Hes was a Feathered Serpent who came from the Heavens!
landovida 1 year ago
@landovida it was originally the name of an emperor who wanted to half human sacrifice, then they built the mythos over him =P
Morganofthesea 1 year ago
look this up on the website "debunker" .com
itzahazylife 1 year ago
One of the best documentaries I have ever seen. But do I belive....
jamesaellis 1 year ago
viva mexico cabrones. somos dioses.
1980vince 1 year ago 8
Impressive!
jamesaellis 1 year ago
THIS IS INCREDIBLE!!!!!!
THANKS
mrcorrea2000 1 year ago
1: What most ppl dont think about is that they cant know how old these ancient sites are or when they where built cause only organic remnants of once-living organisms can be carbon dated because the C-14 that is tested for is replenished in the organisms while they are alive. But once they die, it is no longer replenished and the C-14 decays. By measuring the amount of decay, the age can be determined. So, no, you can't Carbon date stone.
PrometheusX9 2 years ago
Thanks for sharing. Do you happen to know the name of the music played?
beltor333 2 years ago
Most of the evidence that Von Daniken relies on is easily explained. Instead of citing every piece of evidence that vaguely suports his theories he should concentrate only on the small quantity of that which cannot. Skeptics need only debunk the weakest evidence to discredit a theory. By dumping that weakest evidence the theory is strengthened and becomes more credible and less easily debunked. This is his error, not the concept itself.
shatros 2 years ago
They loved our Tacos!
enriquegonzalez1972 3 years ago 5
Aliens seem to love Mexico...viva Mexico!
usoolaldeen 3 years ago 6
COZ IT STINKS
thewasted1 2 years ago
@thewasted1 your mama!!!
1980vince 1 year ago