@chittyshevy For the Civic driver - most likely yes. For the passenger - possibly. The Silverado driver would have a broken right leg for sure, his footwell got ruined and in real life he would presumably have had his foot pressed hard against the brakes.
SUVs are much heavier and bigger than regular cars, and obviously they are safer because of that, but there is an advantage that car has in a crash and that is SUVs high center of gravity,so imagine a normal car hitting an SUV at the side with 60 km/h.I would not want be in an SUV at that moment. I do not want to insult anyone and tell that SUVs are not safer, I mean they are safer in a crash against a normal car but they are not safer in a frontal crash into a wall just because of their weight.
"What frustrates me even more is those idiot's who keep saying that the Civic did poorly, whereas the injury measurements reflect the opposite. I guess people lack the ability for critical thinking and literacy. It is not my opinion, this is based on data gathered from the dummies" Original comment um wtf are you talking about??
Smaller cars are cheaper, more efficient, safer for pedestrians, better handling, better looking and more fun to drive. That being said this is America and everyone has the right to drive which ever car they want, but if i had a dollar for every time a woman talking on a cell phone in a big empty SUV ran a red light or merged without looking and almost hit me in my 01 civic coupe. I understand vans and trucks, but if you want an suv for AWD you can get a Subaru or other AWD car
Thousands of stranded motorists each year die in their cars in the winter(kids, mothers, children, etc.), if they drove 4wd suv's their lives could have been saved.
Last year, drunk driver in a 1999 honda civic hit my uncle head on at 60 mph, my uncle was in a 2009 tahoe. The drunk driver(as opposed to the norm) died instantly, while my uncle walked away. SUV's save lives.... <3 :)
Or the fact that if a semi rear ends me he will go through half my car at just 50 mph or the fact that if a dumpster truck hits me head on his wheel would go over my hood and crush me or the fact that I can't go through 6 inches of snow or the fact that if I rear end someone at 2 mph my car is totaled, or the fact that I don't have half the visibilty as I normally would in an suv
I know my 3100 lb jeep cherokee performs poorly in crash tests, but so does the same year civic(1999)... But at least I know I have some chance of surviving if I hit at least a new sub compact(they would walk away, I would have no legs). Where as in a Civic I would be hurt much more against ANY modern vehicle.
Its amusing to note the attitude of SUV drivers, "don't drive a car" they say. Well how about you don't drive a SUV. Seriously, once everyone drives SUV's are we all then supposed to move up to small Trucks? Everyone started in cars, its people that decide they 'need' an SUV that fuel the never ending bullshit cycle.
Anyone who loves America loves freedom. That means the freedom to drive what the fuck you wanna drive. I hate those people that call people pussies for driving a car. You think you're all big and bad in a truck when you ain't shit and have a tiny dick.
Ouch I would not want to be spayed with that near boiling water that would hurt like a bitch, and the funny thing is that I actually used to have a red 2001 honda civic coupe.
I would not say the car is unsafe. What this test demonstrates is how dangerous SUV’s are to ordinary cars. Test after test has shown time and again that these high ground clearance suv’s are a serious danger to other road users (including pedestrians) when compared to cars, whilst not necessarily protecting their occupants any better than cars when hitting stationary ridged objects. They should be driven only by people who NEED off road capabilities.
@bommmmmmmm shut the hell up, last time i checked this is America the land of the free and people have the right to drive what ever the fuck they want, maybe they should make every body drive trucks, thats fair, your an idiot
I drive a Silverado and do use it as a Truck or whatever I need iy for. This is why this country is so fucked up! Sjould buses all get banned too? All because of the little pussy cars on the road?
@bommmmmmmm man I agree with you a hundred and ten percent when you said "They should be driven only by people who NEED off road capabilities." ... SUV's are such inefficient vehicles for daily commuting on roadways, I absolutely hate them in that sense, otherwise its good to have one if u live on a farm or an area that you would need off road capabilities.
@bommmmmmmm I like my SUV, I used to own a car. It's nice to know you have the upper hand in a wreck. It's THEIR choice to drive a roller skate, and they realize it's a trade between fuel economy and relative safety.
@98MAzdaMilleniaS 1/6 You have the upper hand NOT because of good design but because you ‘override’ the protection systems of ordinary cars. You miss the point on why cars are lower. Their safer for ordinary driving on at speed on roads because of a lower centre of gravity ensures better handling and stability required for higher speed driving. Look @ what high ground clearance 4x4 were originally designed for – travelling at slow/ modest speed over uneven terrain that would not be impassable..
@bommmmmmmm You think you are unsafe because of SUV's.... Well I think car's should be banned, I was rear ended in my old cherokee at 25 mph and fuel spewed out the gas tank and both cars caught fire. If cars werent so low then they wouldn't hit my gas tank. Plus there are these vehicles on the road that you call.... Semi's, buses, etc. SUV's(typically) have larger crumple zones and have more weight. My unibody 4wd jeep cherokee has a lower roofline than a dodge caliber lmao....
@98MAzdaMilleniaS 2/6...in cars. They were never supposed to be for freeways. Their higher centre of gravity means they have inferior handling, longer stopping distances and far more likely to roll over at higher speeds. In that respect they are fundamentally flawed. Incidentally, you might want to check up on off set crash tests into barriers of some SUV’s – not as good as many cars and furthermore some ‘pick ups’ were downright dreadful. A good large car WILL provide excellent protection ..
3/6...in a crash – whilst giving other road users a better chance. Its NOT the weight of the vehicle – many large cars are just as heavy as an SUV. It’s the height of suv’s that causes the problem. It’s not just cars but pedestrians too. Lets hope you never accidentally run a red light and hit a kid, because where’s a car tends to hit pedestrians at leg / hip level your suv will hit at upper body level (or head with a kid) ensuring fatal injuries. Let also hope you never ..
4/6...hit an ordinary car. You will hit above the cars impact absorbing members, pushing them uselessly under you, your own impact absorbing members will do nothing either as they would have hit the cars upper structure so will not dissipate energy before they reach the cars firewall causing cabin collapse and serious injury. Yet if you had both been in safe cars ALL people could have walked away. So what do you suggest when you say it’s their choice to drive a ...
@98MAzdaMilleniaS 5/6...‘roller-skate’? Do you suggest that everyone should go out and buy for daily road use less suitable, less stable, inferior handling high ground clearance vehicles to protect ourselves from other fools who go out and buy less suitable, less stable, inferior handling high ground clearance SUV vehicles??? Past experience with SUV drivers tells me that I won’t be able to reason with you. I choose...
@98MAzdaMilleniaS 6/6...to drive a very safe ‘roller-skate’ because I know it will protect me well in a crash on its own or with another car, whilst still giving other people a chance. You drive a high ground clearance machine to ‘have the upper hand in a wreck’ with out regard for the other party. The ‘me, me, me’ society. That’s where you and I differ.
@bommmmmmmm Plus I don't like hyrdolocking my engine if I drive through a 2 inch puddle. :) Nor do I like having to worry about losing my front bumper on a curb, or worry about trucks headlights blinding me, or not being able to park in an open field on july 4 because the entry is a steep divot and I would bottom out, or the fact that I slam my head into whatever t bones me, or that i have 7 inches of crumple zone on the highway, or that I will get decapitated if i rear end a semi at 30 mph.
@bommmmmmmm that is the thought of an idiot. this is America, and i have the right to buy and drive the biggest and the baddest truck I want to. Just because a big truck does more damage doesn't mean anything. Get some nuts and buy a truck.
@jrunyon513 ‘the thought of an idiot’.. No. It’s stating points that the majority of crash experts would agree with. ‘This is America and I have the right’.. But of course. But it’s not about rights. It’s a moral issue. Do YOU need a vehicle that put OTHER’S at greater risk? I don’t NEED such a vehicle so choose not to. ‘Truck does more damage doesn't mean anything’.. Really? Talk to experts and you will find they will disagree. “Get some nuts and buy a truck”..Why? they look shit
@bommmmmmmm That's a horrible idea... It's my choice to drive a truck and it's your choice to drive a car and the consequences that come with it. If you want to feel safer vs. other vehicles, then drive a truck.
@MrThesween That is the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. That's like saying "It's my choice to own an assault rifle and, if you want to feel safer, wear a bulletproof vest." These vehicles have been tested to be astronomically safe against any other vehicle meeting certain requirements. Being in a truck does not make you any more safe, it only makes you *less* safe to anything you end up running into.
Trucks are not only dangerous to their passengers, but also to whoever they hit
@CPUOverclocker64 Haha your comparison makes no sense whatsoever... The comparison would be more like, "It's my choice to bring a gun to the fight. It's your choice to bring a knife and the disadvantages. If you want to feel equal, bring another gun." If you want to stick with a gun analogy. It's been proven that being in a truck is safer than being in a mid-size sedan, so you should do some more research. Inform me to how they are dangerous to passengers? So should everyone drive a smart car?
@CPUOverclocker64 P.S. your original analogy makes perfect sense to me. If you want to feel safer against a gun, wouldn't you want to wear a bullet proof vest? How is that "Idiotic"? Unless common sense is now idiotic. If it is, I'll make sure when someone is shooting at me, that I tell them to wait so I can take off my bullet proof vest. I really don't want to die an idiot.
@bommmmmmmm Or by those who simply need a massive amount of cargo room and towing capabilities. BTW, crashing into this truck is in no way worse than crashing into a cement wall used in a regular crash test so yes, this car would be unsafe to drive. One thing to consider though is the fact that the truck was moving as well and that caused a much higher force of impact.
First i was like Civic 0 chevy 1 but then if u look closer, u will see that the civic was strong (yeah i no) but look at the chevys footwell at 0:57 ouch right also look at the descripripn
At first, I was like "Honda drivers got pwnt!" but then I looked a little closer. The Silverado didn't crush the Civic; it ran it over. Though this doesn't sound very good either, it means a good thing. The truck went over the passengers instead of right into them. A very clever design, Honda.
What frustrates me even more is those idiot's who keep saying that the Civic did poorly, whereas the injury measurements reflect the opposite. I guess people lack the ability for critical thinking and literacy. It is not my opinion, this is based on data gathered from the dummies.
The injury readings say otherwise. The deformation was an upward motion, not a rearward motion, so the dummy was barely affected. In fact, the Silverado's leg are about the same as the Civic's. Around 3,000 Newtons isn't much, 10,000 is considered broken.
@CarPro1993 what are you talking about the civic is a death trap, also i would like to point out that in the video the engine coolant from the silverado gets all over the crash test dummies and that stuff is about 202 degrees so i would say that is more than minor injuries, prob 2nd degree burns
@spk9grsch This actually got very good ratings from both the NHTSA and the IIHS, it does great for its size and year of manufacture. This is just what happens when a lighter vehicle is pitted against a heavier vehicle.
@CarPro1993 Right. So you're saying you wouldn't have broken ankles, feet or legs? I begged to differ competely. ;) Look at how far the floorboard was trashed at the end of the video.. You'd be fuct.
@PineAppleEx420 True but keep in mind also the HIC/ and Chest G's for both vehicles are with in the same injury grouping HIC greater than or equal to 400 = possible concussion or little to no injury. HIC is place into groups anything greater than or equal to1800 HIC would most likely be considered fatal.
yea it makes sense, the laws physics say both vehicles should experience the same amount of force, but since the silverado is about 1/3 heavier than the civic, the head and chest Gs do come out in a similar proportion.
@Atheist18505 well the silverado driver may have a broken leg because the civic was so low to the ground, but the civic driver would probably be dead.
@PineAppleEx420 Did you bother to read and interperate the injury measurements for both vehicles? Because the drivers HIC is 203, and passengers HIC is 400(both in worst case have a concusion. Infact other than the door's being bent so badly(most likely required the jaws of life to remove them) the driver and passenger would be able to walk away. Please expand the video info man.
@Atheist18505 so whats your point? im sure the silverado occupants probably have an itch on their heads at worst. Idk whats so hard for you to understand here but i assure that if you repeated the test at increasing speeds, the civic occupants will be dead long before the trucks, and they will always suffer more head and chest Gs than the silverado.
I mean come on man its a 4000 lb vehicle vs 2500 lb. what do you think is gunna happen?
@PineAppleEx420 Well based on your comment, i will take it as you did not compare the injury measurements of both vehicle's. Base on the intrusion into the passenger compartment of the Silverado any increase in speed and the civic's engine block would be on the lap of the driver in the truck. Yeah a 218 degrees celsius 900 lb block of steel and aluminium crashing into your legs/pelvis sounds like a fun experiance.
@Atheist18505 Your original comment was that in a head on collision between a full size truck and compact car would result in the compact car suffering less damage, and im just here to prove you wrong with simple physics. and your right a higher speed would result in the honda engine block ending up in the silverado's front seat and the diced up and charred remains of the civic driver would probably be smeared all over the truck driver's face.
LOL, if you think this is "good" check out a Mercedes S-Class or Range Rover. Even a 1980's S-Class can slam into a an offset concrete block and the front door opens with the door handle! Look at the tire in the foot well!!! This thing did a crap job at protecting the legs.
That's why Ricers should avoid flooring their piece of shit Fart Canned 4Bangers.
Actually,all the Truck Haters you'll see here are either Civic drivers or those who drive Yarises and they are dieing to believe that they will stand properly on a high speed crash with a truck.
Me and others sucked up the excuses-benefits of why should we be driving a small car (MPG,parking,environment,etc),now suck up the disadvantages of them and stop finding excuses in order to believe what you want.
You'll notice that the Civic is passing underneath the Silverado to a large degree. The Chevy's hood is virtually unaffected. It's surprising that with all the government regulations that exist that they don't have one relating to bumper heights needing to be more or less equal.
I'm glad that where I live (Canada), there are less bohemoth trucks and SUV's on the road than in the US.
@MaestroTJS its impossible to have them all equal height, because their platforms and suspensions are all designed at different height for different purpose
a SUV designed for work on offroad condition has to have higher ground clearance
a sport car will have a much lower ground clearance
Unfortunately we all know that most SUV's (and trucks but to a lesser extent) see offroad conditions less often than snow in Texas. Variable adjusting suspensions are becoming more common but might not work in more heavy duty vehicles, perhaps.
weight is what counts the most............its actuallynot that bad for the civic considering the damage on the silverado......but even a bmw 1 series will have a tough time against a silverado.............
Civics do suck, BUT to be fair it is hitting a object moving at 40.5 km and weighing much more then its self, You will find most small cars on the market even a decade later will have the same results. For example the Yaris vs Camry crash test.
@aniblaelas This is a 2001 model, the 500 was born in 2007. Btw the chassis of the american version of the 500 has been totally modified to can resist to the IIHS crash in fact the european version still got the older and less safe chassis but it cost more,lol. Another reason for don't buy fiat, said by me that I'm italian.
So that's all it takes to smash up a full size heavy ass truck eh? Wow haven't we come a long way...next we'll have grasshopper-strike rated windshields...I T-boned a Crown Vic in my '98 Escort at 35mph and didn't even break the glass. Biggest injury for ANYONE involved was a bruise on my forehead from the airbag seam...and in spite of logic...65kmh hitting 40kmh does NOT equate to hitting at 105kmh...the Civic endured about the same as hitting a solid barrier at about 75kmh or 45-50mph.
I totally feel safe in my Civic . Hmm wonder what happened to the Government and the Auto Industry lowering the bumpers of their SUVs and Trucks to reduced the impacts for smaller cars. Guess that's another lie that we were told like more fuel efficient vehicles nope just bigger and bigger engines that guzzle gas.
I have this honda coupe same year. glad to know my legs would be completely shattered if i ever got in an accident with practically any car bigger than mine
@CRF150EXPERT First of all just cuz its a Honda doesnt mean its a ricer. 2nd of all I didnt ask for ur input on my comment ok asshole. at least i'll be passing ur broken down ford
@fordsucksGOHONDA first of all, i dont drive a ford, try cadillac, in 2009, the ford fusion and Mercury Milan once again beat the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry in reliability.
@CRF150EXPERT Only 30% of the Fusion's parts/materials are made in Canada/United States. The other 70% are imported from China and Mexico. The Camry and Accord contain 80% and 70% of US/Canadian made parts and natural materials. Honda and Toyota employ many more U.S. workers than Ford/Lincoln and Mercury put together. They also have better wages and pensions. Buy Honda, buy American.
@thatmuse76 There's a difference between a simple grammar mistake and someone leaving a comment that is completely incorrect and inaccurate, It was the tire going threw* the footbox/footwell witch* ever name soots* you best, i bet the dash on the honda was pushed back further than the dash on the chevy
@Streetracingpunk72 ..you might want to recheck that ...toyota might have more staff...but alot of toyotas american workforce is made up of part timers and temp workers..and toyota does not pay more then ford or GM
and toyota still imports some of its cars ..even if the toyota was 100% american made content,,that profit still goe's back to japan..a ford can be sold anywere in the world and the profit comes to american soil ..something toyota and honda can not say
@390merc65 You can't think about profit. None of Ford or GM's profit helps the United States more than Toyota's does! Their profit goes back to the company, just like Toyota's. What do you gain from having GM or Ford a profittable company? Nothing. It's about putting the American worker back to work and, from where I'm standing Japan is doing a better job of that than the Big Three.
@Streetracingpunk72 so toyota being japanese help's us more then our very own home grown company's?..how do you figure that ?..ford and GM pay their employ's more to begin with ..they have more full time employ's ,and when 9/11 happened..it was only ford GM and mopar who donated millions in cash and vehicles and other equipment ..while toyota and honda did nothing but turned their backs to us and counted their american profit ..and to me,,that means alot...toyota is a scumbag company
@Streetracingpunk72 putting the american worker back to work will be up to the big 3..i dont know if it happened yet but toyota is supposed to shut down all of its american , mexican plants ..and why?..because toyota is such a more american company then the big 3 [ as they claim] .toyota will shut down plants because of what happened in japan..so this so called american employer must shut down due too parts shortage in japan .the big 3 are going to hire a few thousand american worker soon
@Streetracingpunk72 so the american car company being profitable means nothing to us?..i didnt look but i will bet the american car company probably sponsored alot of things that go on in this country for decades longer then toyota ..and yes toyota hired ppl here..but what about the plant in cali that they shut the doors on and all of those ppl lost their toyota employment ?.toyota might have more ppl working for them but like i said they have alot of part timers and temp workers
@Streetracingpunk72 i wouldnt argue with 390merc65... no this man has the knowledge of economics, engineering, history and psychology wrapped up and a brilliantly ignorant package. he is all knowing 0_o
@teddyd2009 It's like grabbing all the race issues in the world and tying them to a Fat Man. On that topic, where was the "precious, precious big three" when the Japan earthquake-tsunami hit?
Wow - the Silverado's tire went straight into the cabin. The Civic is smashed up pretty good but the driver doesn't look too beat up. I wonder how a new Civic would do with the ACE body structure...
damn a face full of scalding hot radiator fluid from the truck drilled straight into the face. that would suck something fierce.
checkfoldcallraise 6 days ago
Little cars are dangerous when put in front of a pick-up/ SUV. And, Cars are way safer now than they were in the 90s
maccollectorZ 1 week ago
0:16 truck wizzed
beatzboy01 1 week ago
that why I don't change my suburban regardless if I spend 140 in gas every week
thenenebello21 2 weeks ago
Bad enough to get smashed but you have to get scalded by hot radiator fluid as well!!!
violinjim 2 weeks ago
would this have been fatal in either vehicle?
chittyshevy 2 weeks ago
@chittyshevy For the Civic driver - most likely yes. For the passenger - possibly. The Silverado driver would have a broken right leg for sure, his footwell got ruined and in real life he would presumably have had his foot pressed hard against the brakes.
dankennedy999 2 weeks ago
honda made in china
kamaro100 3 weeks ago
@kamaro100 They're made in Ohio, you dumbass.
CPUOverclocker64 1 week ago
Honestly ... I never liked American Trucks always preferred European and Japanese cars, Taking one of these in Brazil and US$ 150 000, :P
AndreLuiw 4 weeks ago
Glad i have the exact same year and model of that truck
GreenDayFan3811 4 weeks ago
SUVs are much heavier and bigger than regular cars, and obviously they are safer because of that, but there is an advantage that car has in a crash and that is SUVs high center of gravity,so imagine a normal car hitting an SUV at the side with 60 km/h.I would not want be in an SUV at that moment. I do not want to insult anyone and tell that SUVs are not safer, I mean they are safer in a crash against a normal car but they are not safer in a frontal crash into a wall just because of their weight.
maral430 1 month ago
its a good idea to put crumple zones on the car. but its a bad idea to include the whole car as one big crumple zone.
amokachi31 1 month ago
Lol I love how the gas door on the truck flies open then slams back shut.
xXjaketotheman737Xx 1 month ago
yeah your done in that honda...i cant believe that silverados wheel ended up inside on the floorboard...i drive one identical to it at work.
hondacrxd16a6 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"What frustrates me even more is those idiot's who keep saying that the Civic did poorly, whereas the injury measurements reflect the opposite. I guess people lack the ability for critical thinking and literacy. It is not my opinion, this is based on data gathered from the dummies" Original comment um wtf are you talking about??
Atheist18505 1 month ago
i never really felt safe in a honda
sodaspider 1 month ago 2
@sodaspider any car will be destroy hitting at that speed against that huge truck, it's like twice of the weight of the honda
josequinto17 1 month ago
@josequinto17 Not my car!
sodaspider 1 month ago
"R.I.P" In Memory Of....
Whoeva Drivin' The Honda Civic!
bbsSKEET13 1 month ago
Smaller cars are cheaper, more efficient, safer for pedestrians, better handling, better looking and more fun to drive. That being said this is America and everyone has the right to drive which ever car they want, but if i had a dollar for every time a woman talking on a cell phone in a big empty SUV ran a red light or merged without looking and almost hit me in my 01 civic coupe. I understand vans and trucks, but if you want an suv for AWD you can get a Subaru or other AWD car
relytv2 2 months ago
at :26 sec the truck is like 3 inches from the dummies head hahaha
MrTrip3ace 2 months ago
The 2 dislikes are from Honda owners
JVPRCNG 2 months ago 2
Thousands of stranded motorists each year die in their cars in the winter(kids, mothers, children, etc.), if they drove 4wd suv's their lives could have been saved.
98MAzdaMilleniaS 2 months ago
Last year, drunk driver in a 1999 honda civic hit my uncle head on at 60 mph, my uncle was in a 2009 tahoe. The drunk driver(as opposed to the norm) died instantly, while my uncle walked away. SUV's save lives.... <3 :)
98MAzdaMilleniaS 2 months ago
Or the fact that if a semi rear ends me he will go through half my car at just 50 mph or the fact that if a dumpster truck hits me head on his wheel would go over my hood and crush me or the fact that I can't go through 6 inches of snow or the fact that if I rear end someone at 2 mph my car is totaled, or the fact that I don't have half the visibilty as I normally would in an suv
98MAzdaMilleniaS 2 months ago
I know my 3100 lb jeep cherokee performs poorly in crash tests, but so does the same year civic(1999)... But at least I know I have some chance of surviving if I hit at least a new sub compact(they would walk away, I would have no legs). Where as in a Civic I would be hurt much more against ANY modern vehicle.
98MAzdaMilleniaS 2 months ago
Or combine safety of SUV's with the sure footed handling of cars..... heaven forbid, the CROSSOVER !!
98MAzdaMilleniaS 2 months ago
Its amusing to note the attitude of SUV drivers, "don't drive a car" they say. Well how about you don't drive a SUV. Seriously, once everyone drives SUV's are we all then supposed to move up to small Trucks? Everyone started in cars, its people that decide they 'need' an SUV that fuel the never ending bullshit cycle.
dustziggy 2 months ago
Anyone who loves America loves freedom. That means the freedom to drive what the fuck you wanna drive. I hate those people that call people pussies for driving a car. You think you're all big and bad in a truck when you ain't shit and have a tiny dick.
KristophM 3 months ago
fit a roll cage on this mofo and hit it again ..i dare u
boxajr 3 months ago
lol look at the truck's wheel xD, i would rather drive the civic than that silverado
MekOlll 3 months ago
Ouch I would not want to be spayed with that near boiling water that would hurt like a bitch, and the funny thing is that I actually used to have a red 2001 honda civic coupe.
dergin38467 3 months ago
face met bumper
manfromtx90 3 months ago
LOL @ 0:12...apparently it's bring your child to work day.
deloreanman14 3 months ago
I would not say the car is unsafe. What this test demonstrates is how dangerous SUV’s are to ordinary cars. Test after test has shown time and again that these high ground clearance suv’s are a serious danger to other road users (including pedestrians) when compared to cars, whilst not necessarily protecting their occupants any better than cars when hitting stationary ridged objects. They should be driven only by people who NEED off road capabilities.
bommmmmmmm 3 months ago 10
@bommmmmmmm Well said!
idontcare80 3 months ago
@bommmmmmmm shut the hell up, last time i checked this is America the land of the free and people have the right to drive what ever the fuck they want, maybe they should make every body drive trucks, thats fair, your an idiot
onenice85chevy 3 months ago
@bommmmmmmm
I drive a Silverado and do use it as a Truck or whatever I need iy for. This is why this country is so fucked up! Sjould buses all get banned too? All because of the little pussy cars on the road?
RedWhiteAndBlueVideo 3 months ago
@bommmmmmmm man I agree with you a hundred and ten percent when you said "They should be driven only by people who NEED off road capabilities." ... SUV's are such inefficient vehicles for daily commuting on roadways, I absolutely hate them in that sense, otherwise its good to have one if u live on a farm or an area that you would need off road capabilities.
theproudONE92 3 months ago
@bommmmmmmm I like my SUV, I used to own a car. It's nice to know you have the upper hand in a wreck. It's THEIR choice to drive a roller skate, and they realize it's a trade between fuel economy and relative safety.
98MAzdaMilleniaS 3 months ago
@98MAzdaMilleniaS 1/6 You have the upper hand NOT because of good design but because you ‘override’ the protection systems of ordinary cars. You miss the point on why cars are lower. Their safer for ordinary driving on at speed on roads because of a lower centre of gravity ensures better handling and stability required for higher speed driving. Look @ what high ground clearance 4x4 were originally designed for – travelling at slow/ modest speed over uneven terrain that would not be impassable..
bommmmmmmm 2 months ago
@bommmmmmmm You think you are unsafe because of SUV's.... Well I think car's should be banned, I was rear ended in my old cherokee at 25 mph and fuel spewed out the gas tank and both cars caught fire. If cars werent so low then they wouldn't hit my gas tank. Plus there are these vehicles on the road that you call.... Semi's, buses, etc. SUV's(typically) have larger crumple zones and have more weight. My unibody 4wd jeep cherokee has a lower roofline than a dodge caliber lmao....
98MAzdaMilleniaS 2 months ago
@98MAzdaMilleniaS 2/6...in cars. They were never supposed to be for freeways. Their higher centre of gravity means they have inferior handling, longer stopping distances and far more likely to roll over at higher speeds. In that respect they are fundamentally flawed. Incidentally, you might want to check up on off set crash tests into barriers of some SUV’s – not as good as many cars and furthermore some ‘pick ups’ were downright dreadful. A good large car WILL provide excellent protection ..
bommmmmmmm 2 months ago
@98MAzdaMilleniaS
3/6...in a crash – whilst giving other road users a better chance. Its NOT the weight of the vehicle – many large cars are just as heavy as an SUV. It’s the height of suv’s that causes the problem. It’s not just cars but pedestrians too. Lets hope you never accidentally run a red light and hit a kid, because where’s a car tends to hit pedestrians at leg / hip level your suv will hit at upper body level (or head with a kid) ensuring fatal injuries. Let also hope you never ..
bommmmmmmm 2 months ago
@98MAzdaMilleniaS
4/6...hit an ordinary car. You will hit above the cars impact absorbing members, pushing them uselessly under you, your own impact absorbing members will do nothing either as they would have hit the cars upper structure so will not dissipate energy before they reach the cars firewall causing cabin collapse and serious injury. Yet if you had both been in safe cars ALL people could have walked away. So what do you suggest when you say it’s their choice to drive a ...
bommmmmmmm 2 months ago
@98MAzdaMilleniaS 5/6...‘roller-skate’? Do you suggest that everyone should go out and buy for daily road use less suitable, less stable, inferior handling high ground clearance vehicles to protect ourselves from other fools who go out and buy less suitable, less stable, inferior handling high ground clearance SUV vehicles??? Past experience with SUV drivers tells me that I won’t be able to reason with you. I choose...
bommmmmmmm 2 months ago
@98MAzdaMilleniaS 6/6...to drive a very safe ‘roller-skate’ because I know it will protect me well in a crash on its own or with another car, whilst still giving other people a chance. You drive a high ground clearance machine to ‘have the upper hand in a wreck’ with out regard for the other party. The ‘me, me, me’ society. That’s where you and I differ.
bommmmmmmm 2 months ago
@bommmmmmmm Plus I don't like hyrdolocking my engine if I drive through a 2 inch puddle. :) Nor do I like having to worry about losing my front bumper on a curb, or worry about trucks headlights blinding me, or not being able to park in an open field on july 4 because the entry is a steep divot and I would bottom out, or the fact that I slam my head into whatever t bones me, or that i have 7 inches of crumple zone on the highway, or that I will get decapitated if i rear end a semi at 30 mph.
98MAzdaMilleniaS 2 months ago
@bommmmmmmm that is the thought of an idiot. this is America, and i have the right to buy and drive the biggest and the baddest truck I want to. Just because a big truck does more damage doesn't mean anything. Get some nuts and buy a truck.
jrunyon513 2 months ago
@jrunyon513 ‘the thought of an idiot’.. No. It’s stating points that the majority of crash experts would agree with. ‘This is America and I have the right’.. But of course. But it’s not about rights. It’s a moral issue. Do YOU need a vehicle that put OTHER’S at greater risk? I don’t NEED such a vehicle so choose not to. ‘Truck does more damage doesn't mean anything’.. Really? Talk to experts and you will find they will disagree. “Get some nuts and buy a truck”..Why? they look shit
bommmmmmmm 2 months ago
@bommmmmmmm That's a horrible idea... It's my choice to drive a truck and it's your choice to drive a car and the consequences that come with it. If you want to feel safer vs. other vehicles, then drive a truck.
MrThesween 1 month ago 5
@MrThesween That is the most idiotic thing I've ever heard. That's like saying "It's my choice to own an assault rifle and, if you want to feel safer, wear a bulletproof vest." These vehicles have been tested to be astronomically safe against any other vehicle meeting certain requirements. Being in a truck does not make you any more safe, it only makes you *less* safe to anything you end up running into.
Trucks are not only dangerous to their passengers, but also to whoever they hit
CPUOverclocker64 1 week ago
@CPUOverclocker64 i think he's completely right.
thecardrawer10 1 week ago
@CPUOverclocker64 Haha your comparison makes no sense whatsoever... The comparison would be more like, "It's my choice to bring a gun to the fight. It's your choice to bring a knife and the disadvantages. If you want to feel equal, bring another gun." If you want to stick with a gun analogy. It's been proven that being in a truck is safer than being in a mid-size sedan, so you should do some more research. Inform me to how they are dangerous to passengers? So should everyone drive a smart car?
MrThesween 1 week ago
@CPUOverclocker64 P.S. your original analogy makes perfect sense to me. If you want to feel safer against a gun, wouldn't you want to wear a bullet proof vest? How is that "Idiotic"? Unless common sense is now idiotic. If it is, I'll make sure when someone is shooting at me, that I tell them to wait so I can take off my bullet proof vest. I really don't want to die an idiot.
MrThesween 1 week ago
@bommmmmmmm Or by those who simply need a massive amount of cargo room and towing capabilities. BTW, crashing into this truck is in no way worse than crashing into a cement wall used in a regular crash test so yes, this car would be unsafe to drive. One thing to consider though is the fact that the truck was moving as well and that caused a much higher force of impact.
LoveMyUSofA 3 weeks ago
@bommmmmmmm bitch i'll drive whatever the fuck i want.
thecardrawer10 1 week ago
check 1:36 ... now imagine those are your feet
KennYA51 3 months ago
did the chevy spray water on the civic? or did it cum on it O_O
TheSlenderFan 3 months ago
That passengers neck in the civic would be broke as shit.
sahibmurphy1234 3 months ago
Oh my god thats the worst crash you can be in a pickup vs a small coupe
marcvie9 4 months ago
First i was like Civic 0 chevy 1 but then if u look closer, u will see that the civic was strong (yeah i no) but look at the chevys footwell at 0:57 ouch right also look at the descripripn
zainuintel 4 months ago
Bueno!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
willyr777 4 months ago
So, the driver of the civic gets sprayed with near boiling radiator fluid? awesome...
dalejr82010 4 months ago
Civic did its job pretty well. Especially considering it's a small coupe going up against a heavy truck
XxBakerxX72 4 months ago
thats death for the driver of the Honda
jamesjackson214 4 months ago
At first, I was like "Honda drivers got pwnt!" but then I looked a little closer. The Silverado didn't crush the Civic; it ran it over. Though this doesn't sound very good either, it means a good thing. The truck went over the passengers instead of right into them. A very clever design, Honda.
DatGuyRawkz 4 months ago
THE PASSENGER AIRBAG OF THE SILVERADO CLEARLY HAS A SMILEY FACE ON IT!!!!
sperfly2015 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Next Hummer H1 vs Smart for two
IBMowner1 4 months ago
wow that chevy was terrible i cant belive those are on the road!
atlantaboy1122 4 months ago
Might as well not even put the air bags in the civics. Do the person a favor, and let him die instantly rather than suffer or be messed up for life.
unreal3010 4 months ago
Gotta love the shotgun of boiling hot coolant straight to the face.
philritter21 4 months ago
Uh...isnt it a bit unfair that the civic is travelling much faster than the chevy?
Int3rvent1on 5 months ago
@Int3rvent1on
it makes no difference, it would be the same even if one vehicle was stopped and the other was going both their velocities added.
PineAppleEx420 4 months ago
A bigot redneck rams into a family in a Civic for shits and grins.
wokeupthismorning100 5 months ago
What frustrates me even more is those idiot's who keep saying that the Civic did poorly, whereas the injury measurements reflect the opposite. I guess people lack the ability for critical thinking and literacy. It is not my opinion, this is based on data gathered from the dummies.
Atheist18505 5 months ago 9
@Atheist18505
Structurally the Civic did poorly, granted you'd have to be extricated, but you would be treated for only minor (If any) injuries.
CarPro1993 5 months ago 4
Comment removed
tyso2mic 4 months ago
@tyso2mic
The injury readings say otherwise. The deformation was an upward motion, not a rearward motion, so the dummy was barely affected. In fact, the Silverado's leg are about the same as the Civic's. Around 3,000 Newtons isn't much, 10,000 is considered broken.
CarPro1993 4 months ago
Comment removed
tyso2mic 4 months ago
@CarPro1993 what are you talking about the civic is a death trap, also i would like to point out that in the video the engine coolant from the silverado gets all over the crash test dummies and that stuff is about 202 degrees so i would say that is more than minor injuries, prob 2nd degree burns
spk9grsch 3 months ago
@spk9grsch This actually got very good ratings from both the NHTSA and the IIHS, it does great for its size and year of manufacture. This is just what happens when a lighter vehicle is pitted against a heavier vehicle.
idontcare80 3 months ago
@CarPro1993 Right. So you're saying you wouldn't have broken ankles, feet or legs? I begged to differ competely. ;) Look at how far the floorboard was trashed at the end of the video.. You'd be fuct.
epcdaniel 2 months ago
@CarPro1993 Haha, how could you possibly make that claim as a fact.
hanoxx2 1 month ago
@hanoxx2
Because I've done my research on these tests.
CarPro1993 1 month ago
@Atheist18505 It kind of doesn't make sense I mean the dummy's head was practically 5 inches away from the truck.
sunnymuffins13208 4 months ago
@Atheist18505
measurements on the legs in the silverado were more b/c the civic was so low to the ground, but the chest and head Gs were completely the opposite.
PineAppleEx420 3 months ago
@PineAppleEx420 True but keep in mind also the HIC/ and Chest G's for both vehicles are with in the same injury grouping HIC greater than or equal to 400 = possible concussion or little to no injury. HIC is place into groups anything greater than or equal to1800 HIC would most likely be considered fatal.
Atheist18505 3 months ago
@Atheist18505 less than 400 HIC my fuck up
Atheist18505 3 months ago
@Atheist18505
yea it makes sense, the laws physics say both vehicles should experience the same amount of force, but since the silverado is about 1/3 heavier than the civic, the head and chest Gs do come out in a similar proportion.
PineAppleEx420 3 months ago
@Atheist18505 well the silverado driver may have a broken leg because the civic was so low to the ground, but the civic driver would probably be dead.
PineAppleEx420 2 months ago
@PineAppleEx420 Did you bother to read and interperate the injury measurements for both vehicles? Because the drivers HIC is 203, and passengers HIC is 400(both in worst case have a concusion. Infact other than the door's being bent so badly(most likely required the jaws of life to remove them) the driver and passenger would be able to walk away. Please expand the video info man.
Atheist18505 2 months ago
@Atheist18505 so whats your point? im sure the silverado occupants probably have an itch on their heads at worst. Idk whats so hard for you to understand here but i assure that if you repeated the test at increasing speeds, the civic occupants will be dead long before the trucks, and they will always suffer more head and chest Gs than the silverado.
I mean come on man its a 4000 lb vehicle vs 2500 lb. what do you think is gunna happen?
PineAppleEx420 1 month ago
@PineAppleEx420 Well based on your comment, i will take it as you did not compare the injury measurements of both vehicle's. Base on the intrusion into the passenger compartment of the Silverado any increase in speed and the civic's engine block would be on the lap of the driver in the truck. Yeah a 218 degrees celsius 900 lb block of steel and aluminium crashing into your legs/pelvis sounds like a fun experiance.
Atheist18505 1 month ago
@Atheist18505 Your original comment was that in a head on collision between a full size truck and compact car would result in the compact car suffering less damage, and im just here to prove you wrong with simple physics. and your right a higher speed would result in the honda engine block ending up in the silverado's front seat and the diced up and charred remains of the civic driver would probably be smeared all over the truck driver's face.
PineAppleEx420 1 month ago
@Atheist18505
LOL, if you think this is "good" check out a Mercedes S-Class or Range Rover. Even a 1980's S-Class can slam into a an offset concrete block and the front door opens with the door handle! Look at the tire in the foot well!!! This thing did a crap job at protecting the legs.
cromartie800 1 month ago
That's why Ricers should avoid flooring their piece of shit Fart Canned 4Bangers.
Actually,all the Truck Haters you'll see here are either Civic drivers or those who drive Yarises and they are dieing to believe that they will stand properly on a high speed crash with a truck.
Me and others sucked up the excuses-benefits of why should we be driving a small car (MPG,parking,environment,etc),now suck up the disadvantages of them and stop finding excuses in order to believe what you want.
truebassB 5 months ago
I still say my ol' Ford Tempo is safer than this piece o' crap...
theyermany 5 months ago
You'll notice that the Civic is passing underneath the Silverado to a large degree. The Chevy's hood is virtually unaffected. It's surprising that with all the government regulations that exist that they don't have one relating to bumper heights needing to be more or less equal.
I'm glad that where I live (Canada), there are less bohemoth trucks and SUV's on the road than in the US.
MaestroTJS 5 months ago
@MaestroTJS its impossible to have them all equal height, because their platforms and suspensions are all designed at different height for different purpose
a SUV designed for work on offroad condition has to have higher ground clearance
a sport car will have a much lower ground clearance
warset 5 months ago
@warset True enough.
Unfortunately we all know that most SUV's (and trucks but to a lesser extent) see offroad conditions less often than snow in Texas. Variable adjusting suspensions are becoming more common but might not work in more heavy duty vehicles, perhaps.
MaestroTJS 5 months ago
Did Anyone Notice That Front Bumper on the Honda is MISSING????
JVPRCNG 5 months ago
@JVPRCNG
It's just the bumper cover, it's nothing structural. It's removed to show the line-up of the Honda's bumper to the Silverado's bumper.
CarPro1993 5 months ago 8
I am soO GLAD I am dring a truck, yet still worried.
PlayHiFi 5 months ago
at least you feel fresh before you go
8Jallin 5 months ago
the pickups are death mashines!
Ampelfreund 5 months ago
@Ampelfreund correction: chevys are death machines. look at the 2003 blazer crash test
xBloodfatherx 5 months ago
@xBloodfatherx well then you can say fords are a death machine, look at Crash Test Ford F150
sublimedward 5 months ago
weight is what counts the most............its actuallynot that bad for the civic considering the damage on the silverado......but even a bmw 1 series will have a tough time against a silverado.............
italoarubiano 5 months ago
Chevrolet Tahoe vs Honda Pilot!
001chatlos001 5 months ago
Civics do suck, BUT to be fair it is hitting a object moving at 40.5 km and weighing much more then its self, You will find most small cars on the market even a decade later will have the same results. For example the Yaris vs Camry crash test.
Laceration242 5 months ago
the silverado pissed
DaveTube24 5 months ago
Civic is for homos !
legorret1 5 months ago 3
@legorret1 Why are homo's bad?
wootness3000 4 months ago
@wootness3000 Homosexual are not bad ! lol ! this an expression ! I have nothing against homos ! lot of them are very great person.
legorret1 4 months ago
Caraca, que massacre, he, he!
RobertoDallossi 5 months ago
honda civic is not a car ... its a FAILED SHIT
patwill0007 5 months ago 3
@patwill0007 The Silverado weight twice as much and still manages to have higher leg injury figures.
dsjr2006 5 months ago
i have the exact same car and now i dont feel so safe
BrandonMackenzie 5 months ago
Next: Chevy Silverado vs FIAT 500
IwantaLexusLFA 6 months ago 22
@IwantaLexusLFA
Check out the 500 vs Audi Q7 crash test video, it's not the same but the fiat did a great job protecting the occupants
aniblaelas 5 months ago
@aniblaelas This is a 2001 model, the 500 was born in 2007. Btw the chassis of the american version of the 500 has been totally modified to can resist to the IIHS crash in fact the european version still got the older and less safe chassis but it cost more,lol. Another reason for don't buy fiat, said by me that I'm italian.
IwantaLexusLFA 5 months ago
@IwantaLexusLFA You can see on You tube a video Audi Q7 vs Fiat 500 ! brr ! i wouldn't be here in the Fiat the result is catastrophic !
legorret1 4 months ago
So that's all it takes to smash up a full size heavy ass truck eh? Wow haven't we come a long way...next we'll have grasshopper-strike rated windshields...I T-boned a Crown Vic in my '98 Escort at 35mph and didn't even break the glass. Biggest injury for ANYONE involved was a bruise on my forehead from the airbag seam...and in spite of logic...65kmh hitting 40kmh does NOT equate to hitting at 105kmh...the Civic endured about the same as hitting a solid barrier at about 75kmh or 45-50mph.
yellowmusicfreak 6 months ago
honda = moving coffin
danielrentube 6 months ago
@danielrentube Chevy Silverado = insurance loss waiting to happen.
yellowmusicfreak 6 months ago
CIVIC FAIL
Donmud 6 months ago
It may look bad, but the Civic did it's job perfectly.. the dummy is well controlled.
wootness3000 6 months ago
the test was not realistic!
who is driving with stickers on the ear?
beachnut82 6 months ago
I totally feel safe in my Civic . Hmm wonder what happened to the Government and the Auto Industry lowering the bumpers of their SUVs and Trucks to reduced the impacts for smaller cars. Guess that's another lie that we were told like more fuel efficient vehicles nope just bigger and bigger engines that guzzle gas.
soyntgo4it 6 months ago
The 03-05 year model had a stronger frame! And the Sedan is much safer it would of had support of the B-pillar!
SeadGBosnia 7 months ago
LIKE A ROCK !!! HA!
MotherMonsterLuver 7 months ago
and my dad said this was a safe car pfff
j20c1 7 months ago
@j20c1 Dude did look at the injury measurements? You are dumb, I feel sorry for you.
Atheist18505 7 months ago
@j20c1 sorry but your dad is dumb
xXxchipperchopperxXx 6 months ago
I have this honda coupe same year. glad to know my legs would be completely shattered if i ever got in an accident with practically any car bigger than mine
j20c1 7 months ago
Still, better than chinese cars.
SuperQwertyman101 7 months ago
why they putting a car vs a turck lol put a fucken train vs that chevy
1993Omarsito 8 months ago
thank god i have a full size american truck..and a full size rear wheel drive american car..no small shit for me
390merc65 8 months ago
im glad i drive a big truck :)
automotiveDIY 8 months ago
kRaZy thanks for the info and the heads up ! White for a truck is definitely out !!!!! Blue is cool
SuperPreyMantis 10 months ago
I was gonna say the Civic lost that battle until i seen the tire inside of the Silverado.
geterdonein01 1 year ago
Damn
lggrocks 1 year ago
shouldnt have hit vtec yo
crazyviolent69 1 year ago
u would be fine in the honda cuz the dashboard didnt go up so the wouldnt break ur knees and stuff
fordsucksGOHONDA 1 year ago
@fordsucksGOHONDA oh yeah, nice 5 year old logic on that one dumbass, go wreck your ricer
CRF150EXPERT 1 year ago
@CRF150EXPERT First of all just cuz its a Honda doesnt mean its a ricer. 2nd of all I didnt ask for ur input on my comment ok asshole. at least i'll be passing ur broken down ford
fordsucksGOHONDA 1 year ago
@fordsucksGOHONDA first of all, i dont drive a ford, try cadillac, in 2009, the ford fusion and Mercury Milan once again beat the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry in reliability.
CRF150EXPERT 1 year ago
@CRF150EXPERT Only 30% of the Fusion's parts/materials are made in Canada/United States. The other 70% are imported from China and Mexico. The Camry and Accord contain 80% and 70% of US/Canadian made parts and natural materials. Honda and Toyota employ many more U.S. workers than Ford/Lincoln and Mercury put together. They also have better wages and pensions. Buy Honda, buy American.
Streetracingpunk72 1 year ago
@Streetracingpunk72 and are cars are still better, they may be assembled in the states but there designed in japan by the Japanese
CRF150EXPERT 10 months ago
@CRF150EXPERT
It's "our cars" not "are cars". If you are going to wave the flag at others, at least learn to speak the language.
thatmuse76 10 months ago
@thatmuse76 There's a difference between a simple grammar mistake and someone leaving a comment that is completely incorrect and inaccurate, It was the tire going threw* the footbox/footwell witch* ever name soots* you best, i bet the dash on the honda was pushed back further than the dash on the chevy
CRF150EXPERT 10 months ago
@Streetracingpunk72 ..you might want to recheck that ...toyota might have more staff...but alot of toyotas american workforce is made up of part timers and temp workers..and toyota does not pay more then ford or GM
and toyota still imports some of its cars ..even if the toyota was 100% american made content,,that profit still goe's back to japan..a ford can be sold anywere in the world and the profit comes to american soil ..something toyota and honda can not say
390merc65 8 months ago
@390merc65 You can't think about profit. None of Ford or GM's profit helps the United States more than Toyota's does! Their profit goes back to the company, just like Toyota's. What do you gain from having GM or Ford a profittable company? Nothing. It's about putting the American worker back to work and, from where I'm standing Japan is doing a better job of that than the Big Three.
Streetracingpunk72 8 months ago
@Streetracingpunk72 so toyota being japanese help's us more then our very own home grown company's?..how do you figure that ?..ford and GM pay their employ's more to begin with ..they have more full time employ's ,and when 9/11 happened..it was only ford GM and mopar who donated millions in cash and vehicles and other equipment ..while toyota and honda did nothing but turned their backs to us and counted their american profit ..and to me,,that means alot...toyota is a scumbag company
390merc65 8 months ago
@Streetracingpunk72 putting the american worker back to work will be up to the big 3..i dont know if it happened yet but toyota is supposed to shut down all of its american , mexican plants ..and why?..because toyota is such a more american company then the big 3 [ as they claim] .toyota will shut down plants because of what happened in japan..so this so called american employer must shut down due too parts shortage in japan .the big 3 are going to hire a few thousand american worker soon
390merc65 8 months ago
@Streetracingpunk72 so the american car company being profitable means nothing to us?..i didnt look but i will bet the american car company probably sponsored alot of things that go on in this country for decades longer then toyota ..and yes toyota hired ppl here..but what about the plant in cali that they shut the doors on and all of those ppl lost their toyota employment ?.toyota might have more ppl working for them but like i said they have alot of part timers and temp workers
390merc65 8 months ago
@Streetracingpunk72 i wouldnt argue with 390merc65... no this man has the knowledge of economics, engineering, history and psychology wrapped up and a brilliantly ignorant package. he is all knowing 0_o
teddyd2009 8 months ago
@teddyd2009 Awesome comment Teddy. Glad to see the world isn't completely full for morons like 390merc65.
Streetracingpunk72 8 months ago
@teddyd2009 It's like grabbing all the race issues in the world and tying them to a Fat Man. On that topic, where was the "precious, precious big three" when the Japan earthquake-tsunami hit?
wokeupthismorning100 5 months ago
take this civic vs TRAIN nex time ...or Boing 747 during take off.
Platon7 1 year ago
this is why i dont like small cars and will never ever ride in one!!!!
kamaster1011 1 year ago
sad thing the Civic's driver had lower chest G's than to "Like a rock" silverado
Octonuke 1 year ago
I think the civic took it better than the silvie
seanofthedead90 1 year ago
i am getting one of them 01 civics lol beter not crash it
abnormalp2010 1 year ago
That Silverado's passenger airbag was almost a little too late ...
LoveTheCity123 1 year ago
Poor Silverado!
GayUOPXBoy10 1 year ago
Wow - the Silverado's tire went straight into the cabin. The Civic is smashed up pretty good but the driver doesn't look too beat up. I wonder how a new Civic would do with the ACE body structure...
autofanatic1 1 year ago