@himmler251 They use it in the field against rebels and terrorists, It shoots and they have tons so they'll modify and use them. Screw what other people think. The AFP would gladly trade them for a couple of hundred new MP-5s but you don't have that and the US government won't allow it.
@timawanet sorry, i didnt realise that this was a Armed Forces Philipine weapon. I thought it was some collector that demolished this weapon. My apologies. Also the US Military and Police forces dont use MP5s, they use M4 series of assault fifles
Oh and don't forget all the blowbacks all firing from an open bolt with a fixed firing firing pin on the face of the bolt. Much less complicated to manufacture or fix, thats why you still see these guns readily available...everything but the receivers.
Why revive such an inferior weapon when the philippine armed forces have rendered it obsolete??? And especially issuing this to marine spec ops is a complete joke! Did filipino armed forces run out of cash or something? cuz they seemed desperate to the point of reviving this crap and just adding a silencer+picatinny rail without any major modernization on the gun.
@Axz92 the considered buying new guns but felt it would be cheaper to update current stocks of M3's. Turns out it was about the same. doesn't really matter though it's still gonna kill whoever's on the other end
@Axz92 Inferior to what? Not up to an M4 5.56 assault rifle with M193 or M855, for sure. But only a fraction the cost........and much quieter, thanks to the subsonic 45acp 230grain through the moderator. Use a subsonic 5.56 through a mod to avoid the supersonic crack, and you've got a bullet only a fraction the size and effectiveness. Smalll SMGs like the Mac-10 are harder to keep on target. The HK MP-5 is vastly more expensive, isn't any more controllable, and doesn't hit as hard.
Its inferior considering the age of the weapon. obviously this is the sign of the low budget of Philippine armed forces. The M3 is designed for cheap and mass production like the sten, how would it even compare with newer SMGs?
@Axz92 Compares very favorably: hits harder, more controllable, the massive subsonic round is easiest to silence whilst still being effective, much cheaper.
That's the most interesting idea for a safety lock. I read that the Filipino military can put forty M3 SMGs into operations for what it would cost to put a single Heckler & Koch UMP into operation ( probably at the same level of effectiveness too ).
After reading Inside Delta Force I always wondered why they kept "a few grease guns fitted with silencers" handy. After watching this video I finally know why. Thanks for uploading.
i may sound a little stupid askin this, but do they use this gun today, and if they do, is it the same as the WWII version, or modified in some significant way?
@TheGeekwad the version in this clip is meant for special forces - the basic gun is the same as the WWII M3 but they added a paint job, suppressor and a Picatinny rail. Its meant for reserves who needed a gun stronger then a pistol but not a bulky as a rifle
A nearly perfect homedefense weapon .The 45ACP is hard to beat as a fight stopper Too bad the gun laws here are so completly stupid because of all those crybaby libbers .
@RedDragonAirsoft Hey your that one guy who shows all the airsoft guns and stuff lol. but what im sayin is that they look better{in my opinion] and that their worth a lot more money if you leave them how they were in ww2:]
I never really knew any info about this weapon is it reliable? and I heard it can be interchanged with 9mm so our troops can use the 9x19 round in Germany. Tell me if I am wrong. I don't know anything about this thing.
originally produced during WWII for issue to tankers it is very reliable though not near as accurate as the modified weapon shown here (fantastic shooting marine). The weapon could be changed to 9mm very simply but the Army didn't feel it would be worth the extra cost and confusion so the conversion kit (consisting of barrel, mag and bolt) was never bought. On a related note there was an attachment that bolted on the end of the barrel that allowed shooting around corners that was purchased.
thats pretty cool but ive been hunting and shooting since i was 5 and ever simmons scope ive ever had was great when it was new but never lasted more than bout 2 or 3 years the one on my 10 22 just took a crap bout a month ago
a m1 fails badly to the new and improved weapons. which is why those who are issued an m1 carbine prefers to swap for a m1 garand. due to its increased accuracy and better stopping power
fail its says in your profile airsoft and the word studying hard, nice try anyway. you idiots are just a bunch of pussy ass teenagers who play games fuckin pathetic. Sorry I wasted time talking to game addicted idiots.
The M3 was always a nice weapon anyway, I rented one at a range long time ago outside Ft. Campbell and I was impressed with it. The trick to the M3 is that you really gotta put your shoulder into and lean forward slightly, after about 100rds you can get good with it! It points very natrally. The version I fired didnt have a charging handle on it though just a finger hole in the bolt and that took some getting used to! LOL
Why pay more when you can use a tried and true M3? Just add some current mods and you have a effective Spec-Ops SMG. While SWAT teams are shelling out thousands for there UMPs and MP5s (don't get me wrong, they are very good) the PMC is doing it for half that! The Phillipino military is very resourceful, they modded the AR-15 to the MSSR sniper, then they modded transport trucks to Talisman gun trucks!
well as a Philippine citizen myself i hate the government they are suckers compare to the terrorist abu sayaf because there guns sucks there they even use garands and M1 Carbines
What's wrong with M1 Garands and M1 Carbines? They survived the greatest war in history and they did their job well. Makes sense to use them now since they already have them, why shell out more money for something that will do the same job?
The reload mechanism on the Garand excepts clips of 8 rounds, and the rifle is cheap and effective. A well trained soldier could eaisily take out a soldier with a assault rifle with a Garand or carbine. Plus, these guns are rugged, can take the abuse one might find in the jungles of the Philipines. Other modern weapons are complicated and can gunk up.
except the 30-06 round is heavy, high recoil, and expensive... a rifleman with 5.56 can carry many more rounds for the same weight, and be just as if not more effective then the 30-06. thats why we use it now. plus 5.56 is a standard nato round, making logistics much easier
Those points do seem logical, but if they already have the 30-06 munition, then they do not need to buy any more of it. I am saying if the Philipino military already has the equipment and can barely buy any more, what they have is what they must use, and the equipment is not that bad for the job.
Eh, a automatic M1 Carbine is useless. The gun becomes a "spray-and-pray" weapon, semi is just fine. That would be only good in very tight quarters, auto is not always better.
an automatic switch comes in handy for killing left wing commies. why did the manufacturers made "full auto" select if soldiers are not even going to use it. think about that.
You can make a gun automatic, whether its useful enough is your own decision. Usually, it's a waste of ammo, compared to well-placed rounds. 3 round burst is a compromise.
its a waste of ammo if you dont know how to think. lets say killing 20 commies and you have a clip of magazine. full view hiding behind a thin wall of plywood. now that banana mag can hold 60 rounds for armalite. you cant single shoot all those bastards quickly. you will have to switch to full out to take them out.
another example. commies hiding in thick narra trees and vegetation. good for ambushcades but bad for the victims. the platoon will need to figure out which direction the insurgents are hidden. once they figure out what direction that bullets are coming from. they will need to fire back violently and supressively to kill those hidden insurgents. you cant single shoot those bastards if you cant see them.
its no compromise. full auto is needed in the jungle. if we need semi automatic. there is always the handy m1911 for experience law enforcement officers.
That's when I say ful auto is good, in the jungle and in urban enviroment. I didn't say auto was all bad, close range is where it really should shine. Life is NOT like Rambo, where you can spray and magically hit every enemy, the recoil and lack of proper aiming stops that. But I digress, the comments section isn't here for arguments.
I merely stated that full auto has its use. wherein it contradicts your comment that full auto is "useless" find your comment about m2. m2s caliber is too small which is why we dont convert it to full auto. theres still the floro SMG cheap, full auto, easy to manufacture and operate, while brining the same accuracy and stopping power of an m1. its all about caliber and price range
I say that it has it's uses too, full auto is useless for a M1 Carbine. It really isn't meant for full auto, you lose the accuracy if it's on full auto. The caliber is small, but still powerful enough to take out enemies at close range.
m1 carbine is not even meant to be a "carbine". its like a very long pistol with an attached stock. m1 has a bit more range than a m1911. modifying it to full auto and attaching a higher capacity clip will make it into a ruger.
What do you mean "not a carbine"? of course its a carbine. It fits the definition, a lightweight rifle with a short barrel that fires rifle rounds. The Ruger is a completely different gun, just becuse they look the same doesn't mean they are comparable.
a carbine is used for raiding, recon, house to house fighting, mid range to close quarters combat, delivering an exceptional volume of fire power towards an enemy. carbines was first used by US rangers m1s rounds are not rifle rounds its miss classified as a carbine due to its lenght. a m1911 can deliver the same fire power of an m1 but why is a m1911 not classified as a carbine? lenght. therefore an m1 is nothing but a over sized side arm that has the same fire power of an m1911.
also the m1s where first issued to officers in ww2 they have the option to get a m1911, m1 or a garand. most choose the garand due to its penetration power.
You cannot fire a M2 accuratelly on auto, it's been proven in the Korean war. Soldiers would fire at a group of enemies charging up a hill and kill few of them, that's because they didn't accurately aim their M2s. The ammo the M1 uses is not a pistol caliber, it's called .30 Carbine. Hence it being a carbine, not a pistol. It is clear you know little of the subject matter, I will not debate with someone who can't back their claims.
Good God, Shadey, I don't know where you got all of this misinformation, but you need to forget it NOW. To start, Ruger is a BRAND, not a 'type' of firearm. There are Ruger rifles, pistols, etc. And your comparing a 1911 .45 to an M1 Carbine .30 cal? There is no comparison in ballistics. As ComradeGeneral pointed out, it's a rifle round, not a pistol round. And "M1" is the designation for a the rifle, but was distinguished by Garand or Carbine after, in most cases. There's more, but screw it.
we call it "ruger" due to its brand. yes im comparing an m1 to a m1911. m1s caliber is small which is why im comparing it with a m1911 pistol. stopping power is roughly the same however due to m1s structure its more accurate than a handgun.
The size of the bullet in a rifle cannot be compared to that of a pistol, because there's so much more velocity in a rifle cartridge. .30 carbine and .45 acp have VERY DIFFERENT terminal ballistics and VERY DIFFERENT velocities. A .30 carbine bullet weighs HALF as much and delivers TWICE the ft/lbs of force on impact. I own 2 1911's and one M1 Carbine. The effect on the target is NOT comparable. And by the way, the .45 is not a small cartridge by any means. Please study some ballistics charts.
"make it into a ruger"?! That'd be like saying putting a saddle on a mule would make it into a horse. Ruger is a manufacturer, NOT a model of firearm. You must be thinking of a Mini 14, which is modeled after the M14, which was a successor to the M1 Garand, and looks a little like an M1 carbine.
titan security force converted its m1s to fire automatic and modified it to use cheap metal folding stocks attached with a high capacity mag that can fit 20 rounds. it resembles a very good gun "ruger"
Is that right? You mean a COCONUT went down after one shot from BOTH?! That MUST mean that they have the same terminal ballistics! Obviously sarcasm, no harm intended, but seriously: The take-down power has nothing to do with the entry size of the bullet hole. It's what happens INSIDE that counts. If what you're saying made sense, then a .22LR cartridge is equal in power to a .223/5.56x45 cartridge just because they punch the same size hole in a piece of paper. Read the stats, man.
I'm not saying a standard .22LR can! You made my point about bullet size being mostly irrelevant to take down power! What I'm saying is, size of bullet and length of barrel are only part of the equation. You have to consider the powder-load behind it, and a 5.56x45mm bullet that an M16 fires is 2/1000 of an inch larger than the .22 lr cartridge, and it can pierce level III body armor if loaded hot enough. The truth is in the ballistics, sir.
Im not saying anything about 5.56 you cant back up full auto? read your comments and tell me how a 5.56 should be compared to a .30. anyway lets compare bullets shall we. shooting a paper will do you know good. compare shooting persons. if you shot someone with a 5.56 in which case he would may still stand but due to the bullets pointed projectile it will cause much damage internally. shooting a .45 on someone will knock him down for good. because its projectile is fat! and relatively heavy.
Jesus Christ, I'm so sick of you keyboard commandos! I'm talking about Shadey comaparing a .30 carbine to a .45 acp, which is a stupid comparison, because they are not similar! I compared 5.56 to 22lr to prove that size of bullet does not always affect the terminal ballistics, which is something YOU OBVIOUSLY MISSED. And yes, let's talk about "shooting people". 5.56 is deadlier than .45 acp because it tumbles and fragments and there's a shitload more energy! I mean, fuck, do you want a chart?
Im sorry are you better? coming from a kid who favorite every single video about guns. talk about pathetic now go home buy a gun. shoot your computer. then join the army. unless you are a uncircumcised bastard playing army in the inernet due to his super special secret service special forces green berrets black ops navy seal CIA swat training. thank you for proving how senseless and stupid vanillaGorilla SS AKA major suzie can be!
Sir, I really can't understand why you're so quick to judge? I don't wish to discuss MY firearms collection online but I guess it may serve you to know I led point for 8 months in Iraq until I got hit in the chest/lungs by IED shrapnel. During my tour I got to know more about deadly ordnance than I ever wanted to. Could you explain, kindly, how this makes me a "senseless and stupid" "major suzie?"
what quick to judge? your just an idiot with plenty of spare time. Dont even try to even say you are a soldier. a real soldier will not search for stupid ass videos about guns.
why are you comparing a .22 to a 5.56. out of topic I may say. whats with your keyborad komandos? someone thinks highly of themsleves. you have no pint in your miserable point of life have ever serve any armed forces. unless if you count video games.
I served in commie bikol for 3 years. I have yet to be shot or get blown up by a grenades. saying that you are a soldier and got injured in combat do not make you better. it just shows how one person can make up stories to help him look credible.
Wow, you've been a soldier since you were about FIFTEEN YEARS OLD? I had to wait until I was 18 before I could go anywhere... you must be one hard-assed paintball-playing kid!
@VanillaGorillaSS actually we receive military training at the age of 15-17 for as long as you reach 3rd yr highscool through citizen's army training preceded by our PMT during the 1950s. which means if you where only mowing lawn for a buck when you where a kid. our kids is in schools practicing drills and handling a springfield and knowing the basics of chain of command.
a .45 is suited for law enfocement because! it can take down a target without killing them unlike a 5.56! I compared the .30 to .45 because the .30s is relatively small compared to other small arms weapons. dont you get it? a .30 lacks stopping power compared to a 5.56 which is why it can be compared to a .45 acp.
Why are you even commenting about caliber? back to square one. you are an idiot who knows only statistics that came from stupid ass internet. I will tell you why you are so stupid. FULLY AUTOMATIC CAPABILITY, AND ITS RELATIVELY SMALL CALIBER- m1.
now thats what we are talking about. dont include a fucking m16 or a fucking .22. a fucking video game sir is a good media that helps me recruit young dickless faggots like yourself to join the army.
"dickless faggots?" Do you remember my "keyboard commandos" comment? Hahaha. You're a real internet tough-guy, huh? We're all just politely discussing small arms ballistics when you kick the door in and start shouting.
Sir, I am talking about caliber because a certain Mr. "Dopey Shadey" was claiming that an M1 carbine was like a long barreled 1911 .45 pistol. This comparison is ridiculous. Then he was saying that bullet size is the only factor in ballistics, so I went on to illustrate the very different ballistics of a .22lr and 5.56, even though they're almost identical in diameter. Perhaps you should know me before you judge if or not I know my shit. I brought back some very uncomfortable shrapnel from Iraq.
yes a m1911 is comparable to a m1. if you think about it a .30s bullet speed and penetration fails compared to modern day projectiles such as a 5.56 might as well get a tommy gun for its superb rate of fire and decent accuracy. .22 and 5.56? no comparison im not even gonna tell you why its much more powerful.
hold your horses son. a m1s bullet is comparable to a magnum .357 handgun! you cant compare a .357 to 5.56. a 5.56x45 have more kinetic energy than those hallow points. thats their point! how hard is that to understand!?
You're absolutely right! But I wasn't comparing 5.56 to .357 mag or .30 carbine or .45 acp. I was just saying how un-alike .30 carbine and .45 acp are, which is what started this big flame war. I'm sure you'd agree, as slow as .45 is, you can't compare it with .30 carbine. I'm glad you're on your shit, though. Thanks :-)
well a .30 is classified as a handgun round. I have a revolver before switching to m1911. all I can say is that it delivers almost the same firepower but it lacks penetration when you compare it with the modern day carbines rounds such as the m4. its just too obselete 5.56 has more kinetic energy not to mention its a lot cheaper.
most of the m1 carbines you find on the market were previously m2's. after they were phased out the government turned em all semi auto so they could sell em to the public
I see your point our troops deserve the best equipment they can possibly have but due to budget issues i think we are not gonna see more modernize weapons. This is why AFP is one of the best armies in the world a
really??? DESTROYED THT PIECE OF HISTORY!!! JESUS CHRIST DUDE, FUCKING SERIOUS? WHAT NEXT A GOLD PAINTED MG42 WITH A SILENCER AND A FUCKING ACOG?!
himmler251 1 month ago
@himmler251 They use it in the field against rebels and terrorists, It shoots and they have tons so they'll modify and use them. Screw what other people think. The AFP would gladly trade them for a couple of hundred new MP-5s but you don't have that and the US government won't allow it.
timawanet 1 month ago
@timawanet sorry, i didnt realise that this was a Armed Forces Philipine weapon. I thought it was some collector that demolished this weapon. My apologies. Also the US Military and Police forces dont use MP5s, they use M4 series of assault fifles
himmler251 1 month ago
Dear Santa,
TONY45066 2 months ago 4
i'd want one of those if i was in the military today
konatychuk 2 months ago
Wish they made a semi auto version
LethalX27 3 months ago
That's awesome!
EManthePB 3 months ago
bling pro:D
TheDennys21 3 months ago
its awesome how it has barely any recoil
RAWRPGaming 4 months ago
cool!
Fourteen88SoCal 4 months ago
now it sounds like an airsoft gun...
thebattery100 4 months ago
Oh and don't forget all the blowbacks all firing from an open bolt with a fixed firing firing pin on the face of the bolt. Much less complicated to manufacture or fix, thats why you still see these guns readily available...everything but the receivers.
drainocleanser 5 months ago
Is it a .45 like the Thompson, since it was built to replace it?
ben191209 7 months ago
@ben191209 Yeah its .45 ACP
Ironfistconsumerist 7 months ago
I came
Ironfistconsumerist 7 months ago
that is SEXY AS HELL
GisSlicknSmooth 8 months ago
Awesome.
SeedyNotions 8 months ago
Inseln erstaunlich gud yu no joke really howd u put silencer on
AWESOMETOMCAT 8 months ago
@MrWarlord396 it would be more practical if you didnt put all that crap on your guns which make it about 20 more pounds lol
SSsoldat1 8 months ago
hello
SSsoldat1 8 months ago
I want one!
cavolpert 8 months ago
Notice he's shooting the M3 version, as opposed to the later M3A1. That suppressor really works!
audadvnc 8 months ago
if i'm correct, this was to solve funding & and equipment problems by modernizing old stores of outdated guns.
MrWarlord396 8 months ago
this is from the philippines.ask me why
sniperwarfare97 9 months ago
badass grease gun..
bluxxx999 9 months ago
ahh FUCK!, why so expensive? they used to cost like 5$ to make
demonwolfdawg 10 months ago 2
@demonwolfdawg cause its from the 40s and what year are we in now
brennen7797 10 months ago
@brennen7797 so it goes up to 1,000?
demonwolfdawg 10 months ago
@demonwolfdawg apparently
brennen7797 10 months ago
@demonwolfdawg OVER 9000!
jando426 9 months ago
@jando426 :(
demonwolfdawg 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@demonwolfdawg inflation that was 65 years ago
andrewd1120 9 months ago
They still use grease guns?
DaRebel21 10 months ago
Why revive such an inferior weapon when the philippine armed forces have rendered it obsolete??? And especially issuing this to marine spec ops is a complete joke! Did filipino armed forces run out of cash or something? cuz they seemed desperate to the point of reviving this crap and just adding a silencer+picatinny rail without any major modernization on the gun.
Axz92 11 months ago
@Axz92 why its what we filipinos call "recycling"
PulisSniper 11 months ago
@Axz92 the considered buying new guns but felt it would be cheaper to update current stocks of M3's. Turns out it was about the same. doesn't really matter though it's still gonna kill whoever's on the other end
Garhunt05 10 months ago
@Axz92 Inferior to what? Not up to an M4 5.56 assault rifle with M193 or M855, for sure. But only a fraction the cost........and much quieter, thanks to the subsonic 45acp 230grain through the moderator. Use a subsonic 5.56 through a mod to avoid the supersonic crack, and you've got a bullet only a fraction the size and effectiveness. Smalll SMGs like the Mac-10 are harder to keep on target. The HK MP-5 is vastly more expensive, isn't any more controllable, and doesn't hit as hard.
jgreystoke 6 months ago
@jgreystoke
Its inferior considering the age of the weapon. obviously this is the sign of the low budget of Philippine armed forces. The M3 is designed for cheap and mass production like the sten, how would it even compare with newer SMGs?
Axz92 6 months ago
@Axz92 Compares very favorably: hits harder, more controllable, the massive subsonic round is easiest to silence whilst still being effective, much cheaper.
jgreystoke 6 months ago
@Axz92
Inferior why? What are you talking about? I wanna see you hit a dinner plat on full auto at 100 yards with any modern smg.
drainocleanser 5 months ago
@jgreystoke
I mean for shouldn't spec ops be given a much better and advanced weapon?
Axz92 6 months ago
omfg i want one
jordyboy321 11 months ago
That's the most interesting idea for a safety lock. I read that the Filipino military can put forty M3 SMGs into operations for what it would cost to put a single Heckler & Koch UMP into operation ( probably at the same level of effectiveness too ).
oeyesea 1 year ago
holy shit, you can actually here the bolt moving.... its literally silenced!
Johnvogel13 1 year ago
When did M3s come with scopes?
360Nomad 1 year ago
@ThePanzerWarMachine The M3 Grease Gun & MP40 look very simular.
( Comming from a Norwegian...)
FreestylaBoy 1 year ago
sure is mall ninja in here.
rifleman1122 1 year ago
Chicken wing much???
lugnuts69 1 year ago
wow the low firrerate + surpresor make it very good controlable!
theroyalgrapefruit 1 year ago
After reading Inside Delta Force I always wondered why they kept "a few grease guns fitted with silencers" handy. After watching this video I finally know why. Thanks for uploading.
FinestMelatonin3mg 1 year ago
i may sound a little stupid askin this, but do they use this gun today, and if they do, is it the same as the WWII version, or modified in some significant way?
TheGeekwad 1 year ago
@TheGeekwad The gun is still in very limited use with tank crews and are the exact same gun today as they were during WWII.
saculla1975 1 year ago
@TheGeekwad the version in this clip is meant for special forces - the basic gun is the same as the WWII M3 but they added a paint job, suppressor and a Picatinny rail. Its meant for reserves who needed a gun stronger then a pistol but not a bulky as a rifle
redcoltken 1 year ago
Are you a Philippine marine?
from the philippines
PulisSniper 1 year ago
I like it! i want one!
adrianrubi 1 year ago
great video, thanks for posting
preparehandbook 1 year ago
A nearly perfect homedefense weapon .The 45ACP is hard to beat as a fight stopper Too bad the gun laws here are so completly stupid because of all those crybaby libbers .
bigdubbatoo 1 year ago
@bigdubbatoo Not better than a shotgun. I'll take a 16ga 2.75 #4 coates compensator over the m3 ( I like the m3)
GrigoriZhukov 1 year ago
@bigdubbatoo exactly-- they say "why do you need a fully-automatic machine gun" i say "why DON'T we deserve them?"
MrWarlord396 8 months ago
thats what i want to see, a cool gun shoting at visible targets, no a fucking red neck firing at nothing
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
timawa kanino naka issue yang mga baril na yan ang ganda khit ww2 weapon kumakatay
iiiasaiii 1 year ago
Nice video, thanks for uploading :)
WatchRyder 1 year ago
that is fuckin awesome
kommando92 1 year ago
sexy weapon
flymistaslick 1 year ago
all i have to say is sweet
kingd3001 1 year ago
Better than KRISS i guess. :)
DennyAJD 1 year ago
looks like a daewood k7
tron72mon 1 year ago
god that is sick
cheech658 1 year ago
that gun is pimped out
falcondude32 1 year ago
My people really know how to modify guns.... sweet
Gemo377 1 year ago
wow that actually looks rly modern
phish33194 1 year ago
How the hell did he get a scope on a M3? Do they have rails for them?
IWIUSMCIMIUSSR 1 year ago
Take the Sight and Suppressor off and it is a real Grease Gun
Telonelemon3 1 year ago
world war 2 guns upgraded with suppressors and red dot sights FTW hahaha hell yea
hexlhieA 1 year ago
i could never do that to a peice of history like that
SSsoldat1 1 year ago 2
@SSsoldat1 what do you think this thing was made for? Too shoot not to be a wall hanger
RedDragonAirsoft 1 year ago 4
@RedDragonAirsoft Hey your that one guy who shows all the airsoft guns and stuff lol. but what im sayin is that they look better{in my opinion] and that their worth a lot more money if you leave them how they were in ww2:]
SSsoldat1 1 year ago
@SSsoldat1 ah yes, how dare they solve a practical problem and make use of their useless stores of guns by modernizing and modularizing them.
they are meant to be in the hands of those who need them, not the hands of collectors.
MrWarlord396 8 months ago
WOW! Excellent shooting. Right at 45 yards, shows that the big bullet slow fire concept still works!
sbd45acp 1 year ago
hahaha thts soo sick
MilSim411 1 year ago
We need to bring back WW2 guns and customize them like that.
IronLion27 2 years ago
@IronLion27 the Philippines have
Garhunt05 1 year ago
I smell a Pack-A-Punch machine in the making.
gomddrummer 1 year ago
@IronLion27 Our country's marines are doing that, since they have so much budget cuts
Gemo377 1 year ago
very nice kling klang klung....didnt expect an old eqp like tat can be mod to socom style.
bghon 2 years ago
Now that's some nice shooting!
tehGR1ZZ 2 years ago
Shlocklocklocklock---Tititititititiiing !!! What a music!
serbianhero 2 years ago
I never really knew any info about this weapon is it reliable? and I heard it can be interchanged with 9mm so our troops can use the 9x19 round in Germany. Tell me if I am wrong. I don't know anything about this thing.
Jstnevns 2 years ago
I think youll find it uses .45acp,there may well be versions in 9mm,i think theres a conversion kit too.
silver760 2 years ago
originally produced during WWII for issue to tankers it is very reliable though not near as accurate as the modified weapon shown here (fantastic shooting marine). The weapon could be changed to 9mm very simply but the Army didn't feel it would be worth the extra cost and confusion so the conversion kit (consisting of barrel, mag and bolt) was never bought. On a related note there was an attachment that bolted on the end of the barrel that allowed shooting around corners that was purchased.
texasdustfart 2 years ago
the germans used a 9mm parabellum round in their sub machineguns
baconator490 1 year ago
thats pretty cool but ive been hunting and shooting since i was 5 and ever simmons scope ive ever had was great when it was new but never lasted more than bout 2 or 3 years the one on my 10 22 just took a crap bout a month ago
rangerman2237 2 years ago
just got my simmons today. theyre high quality and only 50 bucks
ObviouslyBoredKid 2 years ago
insanely badass =D
keepwhistlingbob 2 years ago
yan yung baril ni vic moroe di ba?
EvendimataE 2 years ago
a m1 fails badly to the new and improved weapons. which is why those who are issued an m1 carbine prefers to swap for a m1 garand. due to its increased accuracy and better stopping power
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
fail its says in your profile airsoft and the word studying hard, nice try anyway. you idiots are just a bunch of pussy ass teenagers who play games fuckin pathetic. Sorry I wasted time talking to game addicted idiots.
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
My question is?;
why would you silence an M3 Grease Gun? it's the most coolest sounding gun Americans ever made?! O.0
( comming from a German..)
ThePanzerWarMachine 2 years ago 8
The ones issued to special operations units are silenced. The ones issued to armor crews (the majority) are not.
timawanet 2 years ago 13
okay, that makes sence? do they still use the Grease Gun? i know it was used in a limit number in the Vietnam war, but do they?
ThePanzerWarMachine 2 years ago
its still being used by other countries such as mine philippines. its a fine gun as long as it can still shoot bullets its still in service!
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
I love its slow rate of fire
commommm 2 years ago 2
Real Prob is Government spends money on cheap ammo
christlubas 2 years ago
How about the M2 Browning and about only few Barrett .50
christlubas 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ang lakas ng loob niyo mag english putsa mali-mali naman grammar, hoy mag tagalog na lang kayo!!!
askrodel 2 years ago
m3 version 2006? LOL
ePLANKA 2 years ago
idk about the red dot but that gun is sexy
happymerc 2 years ago
The M3 was always a nice weapon anyway, I rented one at a range long time ago outside Ft. Campbell and I was impressed with it. The trick to the M3 is that you really gotta put your shoulder into and lean forward slightly, after about 100rds you can get good with it! It points very natrally. The version I fired didnt have a charging handle on it though just a finger hole in the bolt and that took some getting used to! LOL
Gloomshadow1 2 years ago
Why pay more when you can use a tried and true M3? Just add some current mods and you have a effective Spec-Ops SMG. While SWAT teams are shelling out thousands for there UMPs and MP5s (don't get me wrong, they are very good) the PMC is doing it for half that! The Phillipino military is very resourceful, they modded the AR-15 to the MSSR sniper, then they modded transport trucks to Talisman gun trucks!
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago
well as a Philippine citizen myself i hate the government they are suckers compare to the terrorist abu sayaf because there guns sucks there they even use garands and M1 Carbines
pilipinas weak
christlubas 2 years ago
What's wrong with M1 Garands and M1 Carbines? They survived the greatest war in history and they did their job well. Makes sense to use them now since they already have them, why shell out more money for something that will do the same job?
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago 4
No the new ones are better example Garand reload mechanism vs magazine
christlubas 2 years ago
The reload mechanism on the Garand excepts clips of 8 rounds, and the rifle is cheap and effective. A well trained soldier could eaisily take out a soldier with a assault rifle with a Garand or carbine. Plus, these guns are rugged, can take the abuse one might find in the jungles of the Philipines. Other modern weapons are complicated and can gunk up.
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago
except the 30-06 round is heavy, high recoil, and expensive... a rifleman with 5.56 can carry many more rounds for the same weight, and be just as if not more effective then the 30-06. thats why we use it now. plus 5.56 is a standard nato round, making logistics much easier
ceverest2 2 years ago
Those points do seem logical, but if they already have the 30-06 munition, then they do not need to buy any more of it. I am saying if the Philipino military already has the equipment and can barely buy any more, what they have is what they must use, and the equipment is not that bad for the job.
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago 2
An AK can do all that and more, for less money since there are so many
EstevanL 2 years ago
My point is they already have these rifles, so they don't need to spend anymore money, like if they were to buy a AK-47.
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago 2
Though i think they should at least convert some M1 Carbines to M2 so it will be like an assault rifle
christlubas 2 years ago
Eh, a automatic M1 Carbine is useless. The gun becomes a "spray-and-pray" weapon, semi is just fine. That would be only good in very tight quarters, auto is not always better.
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago
but now pH HAS LOTS OF m16 but the M16A1 so the terrorist here is actually better they have M249s M4s M60
christlubas 2 years ago
The Philipines does have the M60, seen it before. They also have the M1919 Browning ;)
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago
an automatic switch comes in handy for killing left wing commies. why did the manufacturers made "full auto" select if soldiers are not even going to use it. think about that.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
You can make a gun automatic, whether its useful enough is your own decision. Usually, it's a waste of ammo, compared to well-placed rounds. 3 round burst is a compromise.
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago
its a waste of ammo if you dont know how to think. lets say killing 20 commies and you have a clip of magazine. full view hiding behind a thin wall of plywood. now that banana mag can hold 60 rounds for armalite. you cant single shoot all those bastards quickly. you will have to switch to full out to take them out.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
another example. commies hiding in thick narra trees and vegetation. good for ambushcades but bad for the victims. the platoon will need to figure out which direction the insurgents are hidden. once they figure out what direction that bullets are coming from. they will need to fire back violently and supressively to kill those hidden insurgents. you cant single shoot those bastards if you cant see them.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
its no compromise. full auto is needed in the jungle. if we need semi automatic. there is always the handy m1911 for experience law enforcement officers.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
That's when I say ful auto is good, in the jungle and in urban enviroment. I didn't say auto was all bad, close range is where it really should shine. Life is NOT like Rambo, where you can spray and magically hit every enemy, the recoil and lack of proper aiming stops that. But I digress, the comments section isn't here for arguments.
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago
I merely stated that full auto has its use. wherein it contradicts your comment that full auto is "useless" find your comment about m2. m2s caliber is too small which is why we dont convert it to full auto. theres still the floro SMG cheap, full auto, easy to manufacture and operate, while brining the same accuracy and stopping power of an m1. its all about caliber and price range
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
I say that it has it's uses too, full auto is useless for a M1 Carbine. It really isn't meant for full auto, you lose the accuracy if it's on full auto. The caliber is small, but still powerful enough to take out enemies at close range.
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago
m1 carbine is not even meant to be a "carbine". its like a very long pistol with an attached stock. m1 has a bit more range than a m1911. modifying it to full auto and attaching a higher capacity clip will make it into a ruger.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
What do you mean "not a carbine"? of course its a carbine. It fits the definition, a lightweight rifle with a short barrel that fires rifle rounds. The Ruger is a completely different gun, just becuse they look the same doesn't mean they are comparable.
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago
a carbine is used for raiding, recon, house to house fighting, mid range to close quarters combat, delivering an exceptional volume of fire power towards an enemy. carbines was first used by US rangers m1s rounds are not rifle rounds its miss classified as a carbine due to its lenght. a m1911 can deliver the same fire power of an m1 but why is a m1911 not classified as a carbine? lenght. therefore an m1 is nothing but a over sized side arm that has the same fire power of an m1911.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
a ruger is a good example of a modern day m1. its almost the same except some features of the ruger are more up to date.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
also the m1s where first issued to officers in ww2 they have the option to get a m1911, m1 or a garand. most choose the garand due to its penetration power.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
converting an m1 to fire fully automatic is a good idea. firing a hail of accurate pistol caliber rounds.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
You cannot fire a M2 accuratelly on auto, it's been proven in the Korean war. Soldiers would fire at a group of enemies charging up a hill and kill few of them, that's because they didn't accurately aim their M2s. The ammo the M1 uses is not a pistol caliber, it's called .30 Carbine. Hence it being a carbine, not a pistol. It is clear you know little of the subject matter, I will not debate with someone who can't back their claims.
ComradeGeneralK 2 years ago
as for you my chop suy minded friend. this is not a debate in which you think. I am merely backing up that "full auto" has its uses.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
Good God, Shadey, I don't know where you got all of this misinformation, but you need to forget it NOW. To start, Ruger is a BRAND, not a 'type' of firearm. There are Ruger rifles, pistols, etc. And your comparing a 1911 .45 to an M1 Carbine .30 cal? There is no comparison in ballistics. As ComradeGeneral pointed out, it's a rifle round, not a pistol round. And "M1" is the designation for a the rifle, but was distinguished by Garand or Carbine after, in most cases. There's more, but screw it.
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
we call it "ruger" due to its brand. yes im comparing an m1 to a m1911. m1s caliber is small which is why im comparing it with a m1911 pistol. stopping power is roughly the same however due to m1s structure its more accurate than a handgun.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
The size of the bullet in a rifle cannot be compared to that of a pistol, because there's so much more velocity in a rifle cartridge. .30 carbine and .45 acp have VERY DIFFERENT terminal ballistics and VERY DIFFERENT velocities. A .30 carbine bullet weighs HALF as much and delivers TWICE the ft/lbs of force on impact. I own 2 1911's and one M1 Carbine. The effect on the target is NOT comparable. And by the way, the .45 is not a small cartridge by any means. Please study some ballistics charts.
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
"make it into a ruger"?! That'd be like saying putting a saddle on a mule would make it into a horse. Ruger is a manufacturer, NOT a model of firearm. You must be thinking of a Mini 14, which is modeled after the M14, which was a successor to the M1 Garand, and looks a little like an M1 carbine.
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
titan security force converted its m1s to fire automatic and modified it to use cheap metal folding stocks attached with a high capacity mag that can fit 20 rounds. it resembles a very good gun "ruger"
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
charts and graphs? compare bullet holes. shoot coconuts! shoot a wall! difference in accuracy knockdown power is roughly same
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
Is that right? You mean a COCONUT went down after one shot from BOTH?! That MUST mean that they have the same terminal ballistics! Obviously sarcasm, no harm intended, but seriously: The take-down power has nothing to do with the entry size of the bullet hole. It's what happens INSIDE that counts. If what you're saying made sense, then a .22LR cartridge is equal in power to a .223/5.56x45 cartridge just because they punch the same size hole in a piece of paper. Read the stats, man.
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
a good take down power means less expectation a guy will not stand from that one shot. a .22 cant break 4 inch of wood thats not possible
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
I'm not saying a standard .22LR can! You made my point about bullet size being mostly irrelevant to take down power! What I'm saying is, size of bullet and length of barrel are only part of the equation. You have to consider the powder-load behind it, and a 5.56x45mm bullet that an M16 fires is 2/1000 of an inch larger than the .22 lr cartridge, and it can pierce level III body armor if loaded hot enough. The truth is in the ballistics, sir.
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
Im not saying anything about 5.56 you cant back up full auto? read your comments and tell me how a 5.56 should be compared to a .30. anyway lets compare bullets shall we. shooting a paper will do you know good. compare shooting persons. if you shot someone with a 5.56 in which case he would may still stand but due to the bullets pointed projectile it will cause much damage internally. shooting a .45 on someone will knock him down for good. because its projectile is fat! and relatively heavy.
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
Jesus Christ, I'm so sick of you keyboard commandos! I'm talking about Shadey comaparing a .30 carbine to a .45 acp, which is a stupid comparison, because they are not similar! I compared 5.56 to 22lr to prove that size of bullet does not always affect the terminal ballistics, which is something YOU OBVIOUSLY MISSED. And yes, let's talk about "shooting people". 5.56 is deadlier than .45 acp because it tumbles and fragments and there's a shitload more energy! I mean, fuck, do you want a chart?
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
amen
rumbo84 2 years ago
Thank you! I take it that you, like myself, appreciate data from REAL TRIGGER TIME, not speculation and video games!
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
Im sorry are you better? coming from a kid who favorite every single video about guns. talk about pathetic now go home buy a gun. shoot your computer. then join the army. unless you are a uncircumcised bastard playing army in the inernet due to his super special secret service special forces green berrets black ops navy seal CIA swat training. thank you for proving how senseless and stupid vanillaGorilla SS AKA major suzie can be!
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
Sir, I really can't understand why you're so quick to judge? I don't wish to discuss MY firearms collection online but I guess it may serve you to know I led point for 8 months in Iraq until I got hit in the chest/lungs by IED shrapnel. During my tour I got to know more about deadly ordnance than I ever wanted to. Could you explain, kindly, how this makes me a "senseless and stupid" "major suzie?"
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
what quick to judge? your just an idiot with plenty of spare time. Dont even try to even say you are a soldier. a real soldier will not search for stupid ass videos about guns.
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
why are you comparing a .22 to a 5.56. out of topic I may say. whats with your keyborad komandos? someone thinks highly of themsleves. you have no pint in your miserable point of life have ever serve any armed forces. unless if you count video games.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
well Im a airborne special forces in the philippine army. I kill communist bastards with old weapons. So in this case I know my gun god damn it.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
FROM YOUR PROFILE PAGE: "always playing computer while studying hard
I play a little wargames like paintball and airsoft." Damn, that's I didn't know communist insurgents liked airsoft.
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago 3
who are you talking too?
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
I served in commie bikol for 3 years. I have yet to be shot or get blown up by a grenades. saying that you are a soldier and got injured in combat do not make you better. it just shows how one person can make up stories to help him look credible.
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
Wow, you've been a soldier since you were about FIFTEEN YEARS OLD? I had to wait until I was 18 before I could go anywhere... you must be one hard-assed paintball-playing kid!
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago 52
@VanillaGorillaSS actually we receive military training at the age of 15-17 for as long as you reach 3rd yr highscool through citizen's army training preceded by our PMT during the 1950s. which means if you where only mowing lawn for a buck when you where a kid. our kids is in schools practicing drills and handling a springfield and knowing the basics of chain of command.
kevinabarsoza 1 year ago
@VanillaGorillaSS military training starts when you hit 3rd yr highshcool if the school have the citizen army training program.
kevinabarsoza 11 months ago
a .45 is suited for law enfocement because! it can take down a target without killing them unlike a 5.56! I compared the .30 to .45 because the .30s is relatively small compared to other small arms weapons. dont you get it? a .30 lacks stopping power compared to a 5.56 which is why it can be compared to a .45 acp.
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
Small arms *caliber* I know you are such a smart ass.
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
Why are you even commenting about caliber? back to square one. you are an idiot who knows only statistics that came from stupid ass internet. I will tell you why you are so stupid. FULLY AUTOMATIC CAPABILITY, AND ITS RELATIVELY SMALL CALIBER- m1.
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
now thats what we are talking about. dont include a fucking m16 or a fucking .22. a fucking video game sir is a good media that helps me recruit young dickless faggots like yourself to join the army.
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
"dickless faggots?" Do you remember my "keyboard commandos" comment? Hahaha. You're a real internet tough-guy, huh? We're all just politely discussing small arms ballistics when you kick the door in and start shouting.
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
Sir, I am talking about caliber because a certain Mr. "Dopey Shadey" was claiming that an M1 carbine was like a long barreled 1911 .45 pistol. This comparison is ridiculous. Then he was saying that bullet size is the only factor in ballistics, so I went on to illustrate the very different ballistics of a .22lr and 5.56, even though they're almost identical in diameter. Perhaps you should know me before you judge if or not I know my shit. I brought back some very uncomfortable shrapnel from Iraq.
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago
yes a m1911 is comparable to a m1. if you think about it a .30s bullet speed and penetration fails compared to modern day projectiles such as a 5.56 might as well get a tommy gun for its superb rate of fire and decent accuracy. .22 and 5.56? no comparison im not even gonna tell you why its much more powerful.
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
hold your horses son. a m1s bullet is comparable to a magnum .357 handgun! you cant compare a .357 to 5.56. a 5.56x45 have more kinetic energy than those hallow points. thats their point! how hard is that to understand!?
MagicFingering 2 years ago 25
You're absolutely right! But I wasn't comparing 5.56 to .357 mag or .30 carbine or .45 acp. I was just saying how un-alike .30 carbine and .45 acp are, which is what started this big flame war. I'm sure you'd agree, as slow as .45 is, you can't compare it with .30 carbine. I'm glad you're on your shit, though. Thanks :-)
VanillaGorillaSS 2 years ago 2
well a .30 is classified as a handgun round. I have a revolver before switching to m1911. all I can say is that it delivers almost the same firepower but it lacks penetration when you compare it with the modern day carbines rounds such as the m4. its just too obselete 5.56 has more kinetic energy not to mention its a lot cheaper.
MagicFingering 2 years ago
@MagicFingering no aamof the 5.56x45 does NOT have more kinectic energy than a .357mag. Thankyou for playing the game...you are now reset to zero.
GrigoriZhukov 1 year ago
fully automatic m1s is good for clearing houses.
KimCHiBaStaRd 2 years ago
most of the m1 carbines you find on the market were previously m2's. after they were phased out the government turned em all semi auto so they could sell em to the public
Kylef7735 2 years ago
Right we have lots of .30 5.56 and more but no 7.62 x 39
christlubas 2 years ago
I think corruption and America would well just stop us from getting that
christlubas 2 years ago
I see your point our troops deserve the best equipment they can possibly have but due to budget issues i think we are not gonna see more modernize weapons. This is why AFP is one of the best armies in the world a
DopeyShadey 2 years ago
Wow. I am a big fan of this sorta stuff. Old well proven guns given a new lease on life with modern mods.
MacMeaties 2 years ago 2