The only proof that dinosaurs existed are from fossils. Fossils were put in the ground by the devil to taint humankind's faith in god. You are being brainwashed by this evolution/billion year old earth/million year old animal garbage. Turn to the bible for real guidance.
Evolution have never been observed, that's the reality, on the contrary, it has been observed not to happen, it's a dogma, for you the compact majority.
Absurd nonsense. Evolution is constantly observed in LIVING POPULATIONS. Observed and experimented with by scientists. EVERY YEAR bioscientists publish around 20,000 peer reviewed articles about their research and discoveries about evolution. PubMed database alone contains about 300,000 such articles.
Uneducated nonsense. Formation of new species has been observed numerous times both in nature and in labs. Get some basic education and stop listening the idiotic anti-intellectual propaganda fed to you by religious fundamentalist liars.
Gullible Government believing nonsense, no species formation have been observed and described in the written history of man. And I don't listen to liars, religious christian.....or stupid religious evolutionist fundamentalist like you.
Dobzhansky, T. and O. Pavlovsky. 1971. Experimentally created incipient species of Drosophila. Nature. 230:289-292.
Gottleib, L. D. 1973. Genetic differentiation, sympatric speciation, and the origin of a diploid species of Stephanomeira. American Journal of Botany. 60: 545-553.
Koopman, K. F. 1950. Natural selection for reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution. 4:135-148.
Rabe, E. W. and C. H. Haufler. 1992. Incipient polyploid speciation in the maidenhair fern (Adiantum pedatum, adiantaceae)? American Journal of Botany. 79:701-707.
Rice, W. R. and G. W. Salt. 1988. Speciation via disruptive selection on habitat preference: experimental evidence. The American Naturalist. 131:911-917.
Want more? There is hundreds and hundreds of more as speciation has been observed many times.
Take off your religiogoggles, stop listening the idiotic babbling and anti-intellectual propaganda of your religious fundamentalist mentors and come to real world.
@Hobu123 Have you considered that what you see or or experience is not real? Samas's net, Indra's web, etc. Please define evolution, because until we figure out this dimension everything is thrown out the window like a bad acid trip.
How can egg-laying rodent-like creatures be considered mammals? Isn't mammal supposed be a technical term for creatures giving birth to live spawn? And not egg-laying. Well correct me if I'm wrong, either way.. this production has really lousy CGI effects.
I Don't believe in evolution... not like this. Science is nothing more than theory, one variable can throw it all off... What about the 'Off Earth' variable?
@ferm94 Thats the best you can do? There are traces of fungi in our DNA that were inserted into our makeup horizontally, without the usual vertical traces of genetic history which are vertical. These fungi cannot be found anywhere on earth. This is a serious problem with evolutionary theory. Darwin was an idiot. Do you have an intelligent comment to leave? Or have you not been laid in way too long/if ever?
@JungleMeta Uh, no science is not just theory. In many cases it's fact, and how can you not believe in evolution? I'm not saying scientists and palaentologists are right about all their assumptions but evolution is a proven fact on so many levels.
@Apmongoman Just sayin I don't agree with everything, I think we could used to be able to change forms long ago, but the human case still has questions. Humans are devolving, we have shorter life spans (compare to 5 thousand years ago). What I mean is, you can't observe anything without altering the outcome. Science is all based on observation, and these are our interpretations. We can't even prove particles exist, electrons,etc.haven't seen them yet, we can only tell there must be something.
@JungleMeta So your conclusion seems to be, since science cannot explain everything, then science explains nothing. Damn good thing your attitude is in the rare minority.
@alachabre And it is also known that the majority of humans are mentally defective. I like how a scientific discussion turns into an argument with personal insults, very wise of you. Yes, the fact even that observing an experiment takes away from the result is itself the thread that undoes the whole quilt. Your beliefs are based on faulty info. Keep drinking Fluoride, its good for your pineal/pituitary gland.
@JungleMeta Personal insults? Where did you see a personal insult? That comment in itself lends evidence that your comprehensive skills may be lacking. To get back on subject, you are quite wrong that the influence of observation on experimentation invalidates the whole enterprise. The idea is, to be kind, preposterous. (statement-rebuttal-close)
Like Multituberculata, they may hav had rodent lik skulls but they were related 2 marsupials. I kno, it's confusing, but theydid evolve these features cuz they filled the niche that rodents do 2day. Read more about the evolution of rodents so u kan understand more.
We didn't evolve from mice of the order Rodents, but we did came from the last common ancestor of all placental mammals, wich all looked lk rats and opossums. Then they turned into primates, ungulates, and so on! Rodents 2day hav features that differ from these rat like critters they evolved from. Not to mention there were mammals that had rodent like features but were related 2 marsupials..
We evolved from mouse-like critters, and they wernt true mice (not to mention the mouse like mammals in the late cretaceous were actually marsupials, related to opossums). They may had looked lik mice from the outside, but they wernt even rodents at all! Just like the first true reptiles in the Carboniferous may have looked like lizards, but they wernt even from the order Squamata.
Is this tard seriously trying to tell me we came from freakin mice?? Why would a mouse still be around today then? If we supposedly evolved from these creatures, theoretically showing natural selection choosing us causing mice to become extint due to the fact that we are the dominant species, then why are the mice still around? If it "evolved" into something better, why did it stick around?
@TheDrummerDude4820 we came from mammals that look like a mouse, its not mouse. Many mammals may look the same when they are actually not the same species. For instance human and chimpanzees share the same ancestors, that ancestors is not a chimpanzee, but a creature that we see as looking like a chimp.
Monotremes are mammals that lay eggs and the females have primitive milk glands with no visible nipple or breast. The difference with them is that they have a cloaca to facilitate reproduction. They represent a bridge between reptiles and mammals. There are three classifications of mammals based on reproductive characteristics by the females of their species that are currently extant; Monotremes, Marsupials, and Placentals.
Monotremes are mammals that lay eggs and have primitive milk glands with no visible nipple or breast. They represent a bridge between reptiles and mammals. There are three types of mammals currently extant; Placentals, Marsupials, and Monotremes.
@carlsm95 It is most unfortunate that now a days, our youth; is way more motivated by the quality of CGI and XF than the actual content of a documentary. Most unfortunate indeed.
2:57 You bastard ! You killed my great x 10^7 grandfather !
albert88721 2 days ago
I wish there was another Walking With Dinosaurs series...
That was some top notch stuff.
EthanNin0 6 days ago
thx for uploading
OneManHasFun 1 week ago
The mammals are okay-looking, but the dinosaurs, ugh... the dinosaurs just suck.
RajaHarimau98 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
1:40 our ancestor XD hahaha
mralanv 3 weeks ago
how did they know it had hair?
Lakanen90 3 weeks ago
FAKE !!!
NorthSideCapone 3 weeks ago
@NorthSideCapone well no shit...
pump555 2 weeks ago
2:44 ....... IT'S A TRAP!
corbweb4 3 weeks ago
That early mammal is so cute.
Dogmutt45 3 weeks ago
@Dogmutt45
i think they cutie-fied it for the special just to make it seem more likeable.
who knows if they were actually more feral and ratty-looking. those things
looked way too cuddly for descendants of 'reptilian mammals'.
TheReviewSpace 1 week ago
is THAT so...
LibranWay 1 month ago
How do we know for certain that T rex couldn't swim? Or are we still just guessing...
356butch 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only proof that dinosaurs existed are from fossils. Fossils were put in the ground by the devil to taint humankind's faith in god. You are being brainwashed by this evolution/billion year old earth/million year old animal garbage. Turn to the bible for real guidance.
ErikaCn100 1 month ago
@ErikaCn100 Are you fucking kidding me?
You're probably the most ignorant person I've seen on youtube
theElectr0ne 3 weeks ago
lol, after "walking with dinosaurs" this looks like shit
Fr1jd 1 month ago
Supersaurus could have gotten heavier!!!
FrshJurassicPrnceYA 1 month ago
Always the evolution propaganda rubbish.
kennjohnsen 1 month ago
@kennjohnsen
Have problems with real world?
Hobu123 1 month ago
@Hobu123
No.
kennjohnsen 1 month ago
@kennjohnsen
Evolution is real world.
Hobu123 1 month ago
@Hobu123
No, it's a dogma, designed for the compact majority.
kennjohnsen 1 month ago
@kennjohnsen
What is "dogma" in observable reality?
Hobu123 1 month ago
@Hobu123
Evolution have never been observed, that's the reality, on the contrary, it has been observed not to happen, it's a dogma, for you the compact majority.
kennjohnsen 1 month ago
@kennjohnsen
Absurd nonsense. Evolution is constantly observed in LIVING POPULATIONS. Observed and experimented with by scientists. EVERY YEAR bioscientists publish around 20,000 peer reviewed articles about their research and discoveries about evolution. PubMed database alone contains about 300,000 such articles.
Out of which you have read exactly ZERO.
Hobu123 1 month ago
@Hobu123
Absolutely nonsense, no birth of a species have ever been observed, it's pure stupidity for you the people.
kennjohnsen 1 month ago
@kennjohnsen
Uneducated nonsense. Formation of new species has been observed numerous times both in nature and in labs. Get some basic education and stop listening the idiotic anti-intellectual propaganda fed to you by religious fundamentalist liars.
Hobu123 1 month ago
@Hobu123
Gullible Government believing nonsense, no species formation have been observed and described in the written history of man. And I don't listen to liars, religious christian.....or stupid religious evolutionist fundamentalist like you.
kennjohnsen 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@kennjohnsen
>>>>>no species formation have been observed
>>>>and described in the written history of man
You are pathological and uneducated LIAR.
Dobzhansky, T. and O. Pavlovsky. 1971. Experimentally created incipient species of Drosophila. Nature. 230:289-292.
Gottleib, L. D. 1973. Genetic differentiation, sympatric speciation, and the origin of a diploid species of Stephanomeira. American Journal of Botany. 60: 545-553.
Hobu123 1 month ago
Koopman, K. F. 1950. Natural selection for reproductive isolation between Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis. Evolution. 4:135-148.
Rabe, E. W. and C. H. Haufler. 1992. Incipient polyploid speciation in the maidenhair fern (Adiantum pedatum, adiantaceae)? American Journal of Botany. 79:701-707.
Rice, W. R. and G. W. Salt. 1988. Speciation via disruptive selection on habitat preference: experimental evidence. The American Naturalist. 131:911-917.
Hobu123 1 month ago
Soltis, D. E. and P. S. Soltis. 1989. Allopolyploid speciation in Tragopogon: Insights from chloroplast DNA. American Journal of Botany. 76:1119-1124.
Thompson, J. N. 1987. Symbiont-induced speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 32:385-393.
Weinberg, J. R., V. R. Starczak and P. Jora. 1992. Evidence for rapid speciation following a founder event in the laboratory. Evolution. 46:1214-1220.
Hobu123 1 month ago
Want more? There is hundreds and hundreds of more as speciation has been observed many times.
Take off your religiogoggles, stop listening the idiotic babbling and anti-intellectual propaganda of your religious fundamentalist mentors and come to real world.
Hobu123 1 month ago
@Hobu123 Have you considered that what you see or or experience is not real? Samas's net, Indra's web, etc. Please define evolution, because until we figure out this dimension everything is thrown out the window like a bad acid trip.
JungleMeta 4 weeks ago
@JungleMeta your 100% correct, but the other "dimensions" or spiritual worlds are like really cool acid trips
Markle6 3 weeks ago
7:07- 7:13 Creeped the hell out of me.
Xonx68 1 month ago
How can egg-laying rodent-like creatures be considered mammals? Isn't mammal supposed be a technical term for creatures giving birth to live spawn? And not egg-laying. Well correct me if I'm wrong, either way.. this production has really lousy CGI effects.
Apmongoman 1 month ago
Comment removed
Fuckethead 1 month ago
@Apmongoman Ahh, At 6:25 he says when the placenta evolved it allowed an internal connection, but before that mammals laid eggs. Weird!
Fuckethead 1 month ago
@Fuckethead do you know platypus? ...it's the same stuff :P
KantoIkari 1 month ago
@Apmongoman Explain how the duck-billed platypus is a mammal then.
TheVelociraptor15 1 month ago
@TheVelociraptor15 Easy - mammary glands, from which the term mammals evolves. That, and fur instead of scales or feathers.
alachabre 6 days ago
@Apmongoman The first mammals laid eggs, they were monotremes, like the platypus.
alachabre 6 days ago
Didn't some of this come from Mammals vs. Dinos?
mothrasaurus 1 month ago
i for one am glad an asteroid came and killed off the dinosaurs
juki0h 1 month ago
a burning carnotarus......that is sad
lizardsrulz33 2 months ago
I Don't believe in evolution... not like this. Science is nothing more than theory, one variable can throw it all off... What about the 'Off Earth' variable?
JungleMeta 2 months ago
@JungleMeta well then ur an idiot...
ferm94 1 month ago
@ferm94 Thats the best you can do? There are traces of fungi in our DNA that were inserted into our makeup horizontally, without the usual vertical traces of genetic history which are vertical. These fungi cannot be found anywhere on earth. This is a serious problem with evolutionary theory. Darwin was an idiot. Do you have an intelligent comment to leave? Or have you not been laid in way too long/if ever?
JungleMeta 1 month ago
@JungleMeta
Traces of fungi in DNA? Do you have any idea what you are talking about?
Hobu123 1 month ago
@Hobu123 Yeah, thats Laymen for Mitochondria and RNA. When I dig up the 250 page report I'll forward you the link.
JungleMeta 4 weeks ago
@JungleMeta Uh, no science is not just theory. In many cases it's fact, and how can you not believe in evolution? I'm not saying scientists and palaentologists are right about all their assumptions but evolution is a proven fact on so many levels.
Apmongoman 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Apmongoman Just sayin I don't agree with everything, I think we could used to be able to change forms long ago, but the human case still has questions. Humans are devolving, we have shorter life spans (compare to 5 thousand years ago). What I mean is, you can't observe anything without altering the outcome. Science is all based on observation, and these are our interpretations. We can't even prove particles exist, electrons,etc.haven't seen them yet, we can only tell there must be something.
JungleMeta 1 month ago
@JungleMeta So your conclusion seems to be, since science cannot explain everything, then science explains nothing. Damn good thing your attitude is in the rare minority.
alachabre 6 days ago
@alachabre And it is also known that the majority of humans are mentally defective. I like how a scientific discussion turns into an argument with personal insults, very wise of you. Yes, the fact even that observing an experiment takes away from the result is itself the thread that undoes the whole quilt. Your beliefs are based on faulty info. Keep drinking Fluoride, its good for your pineal/pituitary gland.
JungleMeta 6 days ago
@JungleMeta Personal insults? Where did you see a personal insult? That comment in itself lends evidence that your comprehensive skills may be lacking. To get back on subject, you are quite wrong that the influence of observation on experimentation invalidates the whole enterprise. The idea is, to be kind, preposterous. (statement-rebuttal-close)
alachabre 6 days ago
that's the derpiest t-rex i've ever seen....
Thesurge747 2 months ago
Like Multituberculata, they may hav had rodent lik skulls but they were related 2 marsupials. I kno, it's confusing, but theydid evolve these features cuz they filled the niche that rodents do 2day. Read more about the evolution of rodents so u kan understand more.
KadoatieXD 2 months ago
We didn't evolve from mice of the order Rodents, but we did came from the last common ancestor of all placental mammals, wich all looked lk rats and opossums. Then they turned into primates, ungulates, and so on! Rodents 2day hav features that differ from these rat like critters they evolved from. Not to mention there were mammals that had rodent like features but were related 2 marsupials..
KadoatieXD 2 months ago
We evolved from mouse-like critters, and they wernt true mice (not to mention the mouse like mammals in the late cretaceous were actually marsupials, related to opossums). They may had looked lik mice from the outside, but they wernt even rodents at all! Just like the first true reptiles in the Carboniferous may have looked like lizards, but they wernt even from the order Squamata.
KadoatieXD 2 months ago
is this the same documentary with the carnotaurus? I always wanted to see carnotaurus on documentaries.
ronaldello97 2 months ago
Is this tard seriously trying to tell me we came from freakin mice?? Why would a mouse still be around today then? If we supposedly evolved from these creatures, theoretically showing natural selection choosing us causing mice to become extint due to the fact that we are the dominant species, then why are the mice still around? If it "evolved" into something better, why did it stick around?
TheDrummerDude4820 2 months ago
@TheDrummerDude4820 we came from mammals that look like a mouse, its not mouse. Many mammals may look the same when they are actually not the same species. For instance human and chimpanzees share the same ancestors, that ancestors is not a chimpanzee, but a creature that we see as looking like a chimp.
savanath 2 months ago
@TheDrummerDude4820 If North Americans came from English, French and Spanish, why are there still English French and Spanish?
alachabre 6 days ago
christians wiped out the dinosaurs...
sajakram1 2 months ago
Not bad...Not bad...
adamgrogory 3 months ago
"Our ancestors, mammals" I think someomne forgot, that we are mammals.
inotaishu1 3 months ago 5
the croc is a KSer
lamestbiokinectic 3 months ago
@SuperLoumister @monstermoonshine @lifeform106:
Monotremes are mammals that lay eggs and the females have primitive milk glands with no visible nipple or breast. The difference with them is that they have a cloaca to facilitate reproduction. They represent a bridge between reptiles and mammals. There are three classifications of mammals based on reproductive characteristics by the females of their species that are currently extant; Monotremes, Marsupials, and Placentals.
himmelstanzer 3 months ago 3
Comment removed
himmelstanzer 3 months ago
@SuperLoumister @monstermoonshine @lifeform106:
Monotremes are mammals that lay eggs and have primitive milk glands with no visible nipple or breast. They represent a bridge between reptiles and mammals. There are three types of mammals currently extant; Placentals, Marsupials, and Monotremes.
himmelstanzer 3 months ago
10:08- Do A Barrel Roll!!
pong224 3 months ago
its like life after people
lolzmadgame 3 months ago
Sorry but I have to admit the CGI is very mediocre. I could make those things on MS Paint.
carlsm95 4 months ago
@carlsm95 Well..its NG. Its not a hollywood blockbuster or anything :P
Int3rvent1on 4 months ago 13
@Int3rvent1on Walking with dinosaurs was so much better CG wise.
justafrinian 1 month ago
@carlsm95 It is most unfortunate that now a days, our youth; is way more motivated by the quality of CGI and XF than the actual content of a documentary. Most unfortunate indeed.
mcmlxvi 1 month ago
@carlsm95 I'll bet you 100 dollars you can't ... you have all the YouTube witnesses.
Markle6 3 weeks ago
Yay, Kritosaurus!!
DestrIGNo101 4 months ago
How come there mammals if they lay eggs:L 2:49?
SuperLoumister 4 months ago
@SuperLoumister : Primitive mammals lay eggs... there are some mammals today that continue to do so, such as the Platypus.
monstermoonshine 4 months ago
@monstermoonshine Yea i guess your right...
SuperLoumister 4 months ago
@SuperLoumister dude there are ones today that still laid eggs!
lifeform106 3 months ago
COOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
mason8398 4 months ago
1:37 SO CUTE!!!! I want one!
kinotakashi 5 months ago 14
@kinotakashi I know! :D
Int3rvent1on 5 months ago 7
@kinotakashi You gonna need a Delorean and 1.1 gigawatts of power! haha If you're gonna get on of those little creatures.
Marvel126 2 weeks ago
Nice
JewwTroll 6 months ago
Thank you!
AdvanXer 6 months ago