Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
This has been flagged as spam show
"Dr. James E. Hansen...received approx $1.6 million in outside, direct cash income 2006-2011 for work related to...his public service as a global warming activist within NASA...he failed to report tens of thousands of dollars in global travel provided to him by outside parties – including to London, Paris, Rome, Oslo, Tokyo, the Austrian Alps, Bilbao, California, Australia and elsewhere, often business or first-class and also often paying for his wife..."
---PJ Media 18 November 2011
JuifVivant 2 weeks ago
(When i mentioned climactic weapons earlier i had also included the 1000+ atmospheric nuclear explosions during the 20th century which also has literature on it, and is not a conspiracy theory)
EdgeStormcrow 9 months ago
@Hofsteder I've thought about the same thing before myself! Maybe increased CO2 force water vapour, which could cause global warming instead of trace ammounts of CO2 doing it by itself. However to me its unlikely minor percentile increases from an already trace gas can throw a planetary biogeochemical cycle out of whack.
While true the WV (condenses out) becoming no longer a greenhouse gas. major forcer sunlight hits the surface (Albedo etc) the net percentage of WV in the atmosphere changes.
EdgeStormcrow 9 months ago
@Hofsteder Hello. I regret the closure of debate, i know Youtube isn't the best forum for these discussions.. I do agree with you humans are affecting the climate, blind freddy should see that the atmosphere is being juiced. Of course billions of tons of CO2 isnt a good thing, but we must keep in mind water oddly is a stronger greenhouse gas and is more abundant. Its too simplistic to box one gas as the sole problem. There is a lot of literature on climactic weapons, its cheap+deniable wafare.
EdgeStormcrow 9 months ago
The atmospheric problems are not from the trace gas carbon dioxide, our problems stem from the widespread use of climactic weapons since the 1970's and the fact that not many citizens know about them.
EdgeStormcrow 9 months ago
@Hofsteder heya! theres trace ammounts of the vital molecule ozone, < 0.01%. Ozone is repleted from from photonic induction in the upper atmosphere. The real ozone question is, how do you punch a 10,000 Km hole in one area of the atmosphere almost overnight in the mid 80's? If your answer was spay cans and refrigerators.. Think again.
EdgeStormcrow 9 months ago
Lunatics oil-coal-supporters like Limbaugh & Beck STILL support their dead theory that AGW is not real. They should be tortured & executed for advocating the deaths of coal miners in W Va & KY and forced to pay back for the property destruction (i.e. vandalism) from the endless oil spill off the coast of La in the Gult of Mexico.
duck24x 1 year ago
I wonder if lunatic Hansen is protesting at the coal mines today. He seems to have some compulsive disorder.
doawkins 2 years ago
In 1942 the CO2 was 400 ppm. We have seen it lower ever since then. I get this fact deleted on various warmist blogs. They cheat on facts.
CO2 is around 385 now.
doawkins 2 years ago
@doawkins
liar
aerobique 2 years ago
That's all true!
All coast cities on 1988 are now about 30 meter underwater...
And ice are gone long away from both poles :-)
JorgeCSyt 2 years ago
i love how people buy this shit hook line and sinker without looking at anything.
Can you answer this question?.
What percentage of the air we breathe is carbon dioxide?
If CO2 levels doubled this year (crazy), what percentage would CO2 be?
If you dont know, you're in for a shock.
EdgeStormcrow 3 years ago
Without any doubt man is causing global warming,the only people who dont are the people who believe in the flying spaghetti monster.
glesgason 3 years ago
The young vs. the special interest!!
simonpra 4 years ago