They don't use reverse thrusters on long runways, sometimes 757 pilots don't use reverse thrusters (I've seen it) If the runway is long enough, a plane like a 767 even can land without Thrusters, just good old speed brakes and breaks on the tires (under a certain speed)
@2004JETTA Yeah, I read up on why AA's EMB-145s don't use reverse thrust. They said they don't use them on longer runways that are in good condition. If it's a shorter runway and/or has bad conditions, like weather, then they will use reverse thrust.
They don't use reverse thrusters on long runways, sometimes 757 pilots don't use reverse thrusters (I've seen it) If the runway is long enough, a plane like a 767 even can land without Thrusters, just good old speed brakes and breaks on the tires (under a certain speed)
Fsxroflcopter 1 year ago
@Fsxroflcopter I knew they did that with the EMBs but not the big boeings! thanks for the comment!
cjracer1000 1 year ago
Nice.
Fsxroflcopter 1 year ago
@SkyWestCRJPilot LOL VERY true on that one, I can say so my self.
cjracer1000 1 year ago
@SkyWestCRJPilot I wouldn't call it trash. It saves fuel, and that's less ware on the engines.
cjracer1000 1 year ago
Comment removed
2004JETTA 1 year ago
@2004JETTA Yeah, I read up on why AA's EMB-145s don't use reverse thrust. They said they don't use them on longer runways that are in good condition. If it's a shorter runway and/or has bad conditions, like weather, then they will use reverse thrust.
cjracer1000 1 year ago