No, it's actually quite good. Resolution is the number of pixels vertically and horizontally. These screens are what, like 1 inch? 640/400 (or whatever the number is, I think my estimation is a little off) is really good when those pixels are inside of a 1 inch square :p When you see monitors that have like 1920/1600 resolutions etc. they're on monitors that are like 24". You just didn't know what resolution numbers were and just assumed that a "larger number is better".
HAHA!! OK I'm sorry... Believe me I know what "resolution" means... so I'll give you an example: If I where to give you a picture, Would you prefer it in 4 large colored pixels or 16 that are the 1/6th of the other pixels? In plain text: More pixels = More detail
Well, "more pixels = more detail" is ONLY true when you know the size of the area you're dealing with. So, it would be more accurate to say, more pixels per square inch = more detail (or whatever other increment of measurement you prefer).
Sure, why not? If my mobile phone's screen has a 320x160 resolution and my 42" TVs screen has the same resolution then my TV SUCKS. but still if my mobile phone had the resolution my TV was supposed to have then my phone would have to be from the future...
when is this coming out???
Emblemz 2 years ago
what a prick
stashman123456 3 years ago
btw it's called vuzix
MODZxARExUS 3 years ago
halo 3 or something?? its looks more like Vegas or cod4
arkendias3 3 years ago
turn ur mic up PLEASE lol
Maverick5588 4 years ago
turn ur volume up u idiot!
greekpanther1 4 years ago
get rid of that air head girl. Logan FTW!
Kaleb34 4 years ago
What resolution will those get to?
Hrakleus 4 years ago
640x400 I think. 24-bit color.
qaesyan 3 years ago
Meeh... then it kinda sucks...
Hrakleus 3 years ago
No, it's actually quite good. Resolution is the number of pixels vertically and horizontally. These screens are what, like 1 inch? 640/400 (or whatever the number is, I think my estimation is a little off) is really good when those pixels are inside of a 1 inch square :p When you see monitors that have like 1920/1600 resolutions etc. they're on monitors that are like 24". You just didn't know what resolution numbers were and just assumed that a "larger number is better".
qaesyan 3 years ago
HAHA!! OK I'm sorry... Believe me I know what "resolution" means... so I'll give you an example: If I where to give you a picture, Would you prefer it in 4 large colored pixels or 16 that are the 1/6th of the other pixels? In plain text: More pixels = More detail
and lets not talk about color bits..
Hrakleus 3 years ago
Well, "more pixels = more detail" is ONLY true when you know the size of the area you're dealing with. So, it would be more accurate to say, more pixels per square inch = more detail (or whatever other increment of measurement you prefer).
qaesyan 3 years ago
Sure, why not? If my mobile phone's screen has a 320x160 resolution and my 42" TVs screen has the same resolution then my TV SUCKS. but still if my mobile phone had the resolution my TV was supposed to have then my phone would have to be from the future...
Hrakleus 3 years ago
the volume could have been any lower
igob8a 4 years ago
sweet wonder how much itl be...prolly pretty expensive
buckamoona 4 years ago
dude i want that for my computer that is one cool shit but is it realy good graphice
CRAZCHEVBOY 4 years ago
when it moves around on the screen when he takes it off his head
that is MAD.
MCSin2007 4 years ago
you looked kinda confused when you were reviewing the pc version lol but yeaa.. nice product
drifter1o1 4 years ago