Curtis Glencross Gets Waved Off Twice In Mere Seconds

[ManSocks1]

god i hate when i press play/pause and youtube goes all weird and makes it full screen

[bboyeddroid]

I was at that game sitting in the nosebleed seats, After that whenever the ref got on the ice everybody would boo and chant " BS! BS! BS!"

[BentonioD]

Surprised that Ref wasn't killed when he left.

[TheWitchOvAgnesi]

Which pixel shows where Glencross makes contact with the puck?

[Arror69]

second call was too close his stick was dropiing when it made contact

[bdGongShow]

consipracy? lol just kidding but that call was bs

[Hiei2k7]

First call was atrocious. This is why cracking down on Tomas Holmstrom is fucking with the whole league.

2nd call obviously right. replay from the backside of the ice shows Glencross's stick well above crossbar and even Backstrom's head.

[opmpride]

the first call is completely ridiculous. The second one is more reasonable.

[patriots43v3r]

i think they're both good. btw i'm fairly sure it's the shoulders, not crossbar

[Nycetrees]

@patriots43v3r hahahahah bro go back to your backyard wiffle ball games. if it was shoulders that would make zero sense idiot. So chara can tip a puck at 6 feet in the air but gionta cant?? think about it budd

[patriots43v3r]

@Nycetrees k calm down hero don't get your cape all twisted, i've always heard people say it's the shoulders, sorry i'm not perfect like you bud

[altagolfer]

Glencross sucks anyways.

[eepruls]

This is such bullshit! The first one WAS a goal. And I honestly think the second was a goal as well because his stick was coming down as he hit the puck.

[Apeman711]

Fucking piece of shit ref. Worse then Fucking Auger.

[Mr24fan24]

The first one was a goal, the second was the correct call, a high stick.

[theauraofawesomeness]

@Mr24fan24 well you wouldn't be able to tell because of the bullshyte quality

[thecrazziestR]

first one was weak, but i've seen weaker called so i'm not tooo suprised

second one was close, personally i think it was legal but it wasn't diffinative, so i can understand why they waved it off

either way, sucks to be Glencross

[mrferrier1]

i remember watching that game, and i was calling the ref some bad names lol

[CGY2021]

both goals were good....BS calls and Marc Crawford is a MORON

[JCMoney]

the second goal was a high stick as you can clearly see it was above the crossbar.

the first one was bullshit though.

[Flamesfan7]

LOL @ how much Crawford hates the Flames. It was comical all season when he was with HNIC.

[CrunchSabres69]

man do i miss the days when Glencross was for the Syracuse Crunch

[RevitalizeYourSoul]

im surprised he didnt smack the Ref because that was jusy terribad reffing.

[HamzaHawksKing]

I watched this game and I was really pissed when the 2nd one happened but I think flames won the game.

[wellyes]

Now I am an atheist, but clearly, this is part of god's plan.

[indiantan]

wow i am a canucks fan

those goals should have been counted

reffs like these should be out of the NHL

[deets987]

lol y is pheneuf down there

[bruinsfan1234]

If was that glencross dude I would leabe with a statement by throwing the sick or something

[GINLEE69]

eric furlatt is a fucking retard

[tbrays1]

thats bs even the ECHL and AHL refs are better than that... what happened to that ref by the way?????

[L0NEGUNMAN27]

I can't say both were legal but two pucks in the net from the same guy in a few seconds, give him one.

[Ryanf51]

his feet werent even in the crease!

[Fisher38oncp]

thats just cheap

[Deempie92]

Furlat should go get another doughnut.

[moesaghir]

marc crawford is a retard and shouldn't be a commentator , this is what he says " if u look at the old rule" wtf does the old rule have to do with the new rules , fukin retard

[OrgasmicOprah]

He was just saying that it would have been disallowed under the old rule but with the new rule it should have been a goal.

Do you not understand that?

[CureFan123]

Furlatt is the worst referee in the NHL. He's absolutely fucking terrible.

[ImSoPro52]

these were really shitty calls and i love calgary and everything but this was really funny

[wellyes]

Typical Calgary whining. Bad calls happen. Deal with it. If you scored on any of the other 40 consecutive PP's this wouldnt be such a big deal.

[playinghockey28]

this is why I cant stand most fans, you dont know the rules, so you all bitch when these rules are enforced.. Even when the rule is right on this page. Get a clue people, it is annoying when you whine especially about a crease violation.. It was the right call

[OrgasmicOprah]

His feet were not in the crease, either way the defender was pushing him around and Glencross did his best to stay out.

It was a goal.

[moesaghir]

the first call was the bigest bullshit call i have ever seen in a game , this ref doesnt not belong in the nhl calls like that are ridiculous if ur gona call that why not the other 200 hundred the red wings score with holmstrom in front , this was fukin stupid i dono how much the wild pied this guy for that B.S of a call

[19JesterRace89]

do you know how many of the wings goals are disallowed for this very reason? just take a glance at last years stanley cup final for some further proof....but I will agree that first one was a BS call but the wings get tons of these same goals disallowed, makes me angry when refs get away with this shit when toronto easily has a great view on all of these goals and can easily overturn them

[moesaghir]

this same ref " eric furlat" was behind the net when chicago scored the game winner in o.t in the first game of the playoffs , and he allowed the goal when kipper was not able to make the save because of the hawks player in the crease , that's how u know this ref is getting payed big time, total BULLSHIT refs like this ruin the game ,

[josh17beaton]

1st call was absolute bullshit

[inklinkinklink]

First one should've counted. 2nd one was understandable.

[NJDevils1087]

For the first goal -- didn't the NHL get rid of the crease rule a few years back and change it to where you only aren't allowed to make contact with the goalie?

Since that's the case, the first goal should have been allowed.

[playinghockey28]

you guys are idiots.. First goal foot was still in crease before puck entered.. Allowing for a crease violation. Second stick was above crossbar when contact was made.. It is cut and dry, black and white.. in other words easy calls to make. Instead of bitching about the officiating, why not do something about it? Like try skating yourselves. Or better yet try reading the rule book. When I am working games people are always quick to criticize me as well. If you can't do it, don't bitch.

[sdevils15]

You're the idiot, what dont you get? YOU ARE allowed to have your feet in the crease as long as you dont interfere with the goalie trying to make a save, did he do that NO not even close. Once again if he did interfere which the ref said he did where was the penalty? Clearly you are blind which is probably why you are ref he did not make contact with puck over the crossbar and fyi i have played and still play highly competitive hockey today so go ref your retards.

[playinghockey28]

His FOOT was still in the crease, he does not have to interfere or make contact with the goalie. Your foot in the crease before the puck, goal scored= no goal.. Simple.. High stick was above crossbar where initial contact was made.. Not talking about follow through. Lastly, playing Junior A tier 3 is not competitive hockey it is a gong show.. Congrats on being a shitty hockey player.

[sdevils15]

You're seriously are retarded aren't you? That is not a rule YOU ARE ALLOWED TO HAVE YOUR FEET IN THE CREASE!Didn't know Jr A and CIS were gong show leagues? who knew?

[playinghockey28]

You clearly have NEVER read the rule book.. The CREASE IS THE GOALIES area!. You cannot be in there unless the puck is.. PERIOD.

[a69a59b]

they changed that rule dumb fuck.

[playinghockey28]

Really? rule number please?

[icky2unk]

they changed the rule along time ago, if you even listen to the video they say several times the "old" rule

[playinghockey28]

I suggest you read the rule book.. try rule number 69.3

[sdevils15]

ahahahah like I said you're retarded. 69.3 Contact Inside the Goal Crease - If an attacking player initiates contact with a goalkeeper, incidental or otherwise, while the goalkeeper is in his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

What the hell does that rule have to do with his feet being in the crease? He never made contact with the goalie.Blind and dumb.

NEXT

[moesaghir]

he was never in the crease u can go watch any angle of this replay he was in the crease for about half a second and that was the back of his skate he moved it then the puck was shot in

[jumba202]

both goals counted for sures erik furlat called both Erik Furlat ur a horrible officail we needed a streaker that woud be perfect

[jumba202]

goalnoteveninthecrease

[playinghockey28]

Im a referee so I am obviously going to side with the referees on this one.. The first no goal was a good call because he was still in the crease, even if it was just a part of his skate.. Second goal was an excellent call stick was above the cross bar, and the puck hit the stick above the cross bar. Just stinks that the same referee made both calls.. Really makes it come across as being biased or unfair.

[sdevils15]

1. Your allowed to be in the crease and when the pucked went by backstrom he wasnt even in it. If he interefered with backstrom trying to make the save why wasnt there a penalty?2. It wasnt a high stick it was very close i respect the call they made but they should of taken some more time to properly review it.

[MMorellat]

As a Canucks fan, I wanted the wild to win this one, but this was just funny. I would of just laughed if Glencross got another one after the net came of its morings on the same PP. Calgary won this one fairly. Vancouver will get the division title and make a good run one of these years.

[MadelnCanada]

As much as I dislike the flames, that was a complete b/s call

[10020113001]

I agree on both comments

[weirdear89]

First one was definitely a goal. Second one I can agree with getting called off. The NHL is terrible for stuff like this though.

[alejoe84]

well at least they review... but first call was wrong

[ian5534]

jeff now we got something to toalk about next friday on neal blogtv

[holyscythe]

I'm not a Flames fan, but that was just not right... The first one should have been a goal, but the second, can't be too sure.

[abui4]

im a wild fan and these were some horrible calls. These refs sucked

[heihoimoikei]

Jokinen's goal was pretty awsome but what a fuckercocksucker asshole judge by the ref!

[oleHABSole]

Guys just be happy they took that rule out,stuff like this made it possible.

[KimmoKuopio]

Ha ha, coach take him off

[keeyaaw]

the high stick I can't say for sure, it was close to being a goal at least from the angles shown, but the first one was a goal for sure. he had his BLADE in the crease. that hasn't been an in the crease call in a decade.

[Essie77]

Maybe the second goal now that I really look at it but the first goal is GOOD! I'm glad I don't have to listen to Crawford everyday. Poor Calgary.

[Essie77]

WHERE IN THE BLUE HELL DID THIS REF COME FROM!

I'm not even a Flames fan but that is dispicable. That is minor league officiating. The league needs to look into that for sure

[dunlizop]

first of all, worst call i have ever seen. absolutely brutal. secondly, marc crawford has no idea what he is talking about. what a fucking tool. and lastly, if we would have lost that game, i have no idea how pissed i would be right now.

[poohpush]

im a nucks fan as well and i think those are some bad calls

[Verosthenes]

Im a Nucks fan, but I watched this game and even I thought those two calls were ridiculous.

[bigllama99]

absurd.. this ain't 1999 where they had the crease rule...

[nevmiles]

yeah . . THAT was brutal. Worst rule ever.

[qim1]

Great call he was standing in the crease completely

[sdevils15]

Your retarded!

[JackBerton]

YOU'RE retarded sdevils15

[cabbsnmu]

You're retarded! Invest in some grammar books.

[cabbsnmu]

you're a good man

[playinghockey28]

so now I have to quote the entire rule because you only quoted a portion of it. clearly you did not READ the whole RULE!

If an attacking player establishes a significant position within the goal crease, so as to obstruct the goalkeepers vision and impair his ability to defend his goal, and a goal is scored,the goal will be disallowed.

SO clearly you just like to pick and choose rules that you think should be followed instead of the entire thing. You were wrong just like the fans.Get over it.

[moesaghir]

ya then maybe every goal scored by detroit on the powerplay should be disallowed ,have u seen holmstrom infron of goalies , this call was total bullshit , goals like this are scored every night and none of them are ever waived off unless the player actually makes contact with the goaltender which in this case did not happen.

[hockeyhelper]

THE REFS WERE PRO MINNESOTA!

[ashasx]

amazing. Holmstrom is allowed to put his ass in the face of a goalie, but this is called off?

[ImSoPro52]

wow thats a terrible reffing,

[stp83]

I was at that game and the broadcast does zero justice to how loud the crowd actually was...when the ref was making his no goal announcements you couldn't hear him at all, the place was just in a total frenzy.

[jeppekoira3]

lol what a clown.

[darkknight109]

Terrible officiating. Absolutely terrible.

[gobluejackets61]

LOL I JUST NOTICED THAT!!

HAHA

[Ensiferum123]

First call was one of the worst ever. Ref should be sent to the AHL.

Second was closer. Their cameras suck so it's hard to make out where he hit the puck. Still, should have ruled it a goal on the ice and reviewed it to make up for the first call.

[Makave22]

wow.... bullshit call.

[Michigan1985]

I wonder how much the ref bet on that game.

[Heffiewiggle]

Garbage calls. Second one was more reasonable, but still, it looked to me like it was under the crossbar when he made contact.

[leafsfan313]

both goals should have counted! that's fucking ridiculous..jesus christ i woulda killed da ref...fuckin fag

[chaingang90]

the first one, I disagree, that shoulda been allowed... the 2nd one, yeah, it looks like a high stick

[abyssiniaboy]

haha best ref i ever seen

[a69a59b]

lol its the same ref from the bruins shoot out probly lol

[potan2021]

Glencross musta been pissed...

and i think that ref is going to be ambushed by flames fans >=D

[JulleBS]

REF SUCKS

[izmodezmo]

HAHAHAHAH thats so fucking ridiculous.. oh my

[MisterPocky]

LOLOLOL you uploaded it so fast the game was like 2 or 1 hours ago.

Lol. I got pretty ticked off. I was ready to knock the ref out.

[DudeiLikePancakes]

both goals looked fine that ref is an idiot

[JaziB]

Deflection looked clean to me.

[friskie1986]

I'm not sure about the high-stick one, but the first goal called off was a joke. I'm just glad that neither of those goals came back to bite them because that was some ridiculous officiating.

[XFS]

I agree

[MezM0rEyez]

Lmao.. sucks to be him.