Added: 3 years ago
From: ArgusEyes
Views: 1,674
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Excellent!

  • this has nothing to do with ur vid, but dude, i watched a video of yours several mths back & ur still going at it? u are also starting to look a bit whiny in some of ur vids. for me personally, i don't like the feminist or men's groups. they're just a bunch of liberals yelling at each other. not only does no one else like libs, but they don't even like each other. i think the feminist & men's groups should kill each other off. they'd be doing the world a favor.

  • acadiantunes,

    Many serial killers, Pedophiles & Psychopaths have had a religious backgrounds, that's why in criminology we have to understand religions.

    However, it is not sexism that the majority of mothers get custody ( main care) of the children, study has shown that a woman suffers mentally without care of her children, plus you can't split a child in half & give out the halves to each parent. However, there are some cases where the mother is totally unfit, so the father has the Kids.

  • I agree with a lot of what you said like the part about religion etc but you should look into the issue of discrimination against fathers a little more. We started a group for divorced father about ten years ago [ on a small scale in a small town] yet we had a tremendous response with tons of blatant discrimination, all honest sharing [ no lawyers or money involved].

  • acadiantunes,

    Feel free to message me with any information, i wouldn't mind the information given. It is a shame that we do live in a world that carries dishonesty & also much selfishness from individuals of both sexes. Personally i have suffered at the hands of both sexes, so i am able to sit on the fence and be more or less neutral between the sexes. Both male & female can be damaging & it takes study to eliminate damage. Any psychotherapist will tell anyone that a child needs both parents.

  • Here's an idea for you - MEN ARE PEOPLE TOO! Men kill themselves, suffer depression, feel profound alienation from society, because of lack of access or no access to their kids. And you don't have to split a child in half, you can have realistic visitation times and have them ENFORCED. Men who can't see their children because the ex just refuses to let them should have legal protection against that. There are many areas where real change could be done for men but it always feminists in the way.

  • The worst building blocks are (1) Dishonesty ( 2) lack of education (3) Lack of understanding (4) Lack of love (5) Sexisim (6) Lack of communication in relationships ( inc: management).

    That list goes for both sexes male & female anywhere.

  • There are differences from woman to woman, the same as from one man to another man, this is personality people! There are sacrifices when it comes to a relationship, still this is no excuse for outright wanton abuses, there are particular symptoms of a woman who is raped, more study has to be forthcoming, and some men, not all men, naturally have a need for more than one sex partner, we have to get down on the scale of the individual here. And both sexes can tell lies. More study & changes.

  • In history all children were the property of thier father, the woman did not even get to see the children & she was an outcast, she was left to retire in solace at the generosity of either her father or her husband, for this reason women did usually not divorce, at one time men could only apply for divorce. Studies found that this had an impact on the children & damaged them, it also damaged the woman mentally. This is why women usually get custody, it's not sexisim, it's cutting down damage.

  • Children are damaged by being deprived of their father also. Most criminals come from single mother homes so.... and it is sexi sim . In most cases a mother gets custody because she is the primary care giver, but most men are the primary "financial" caregivers which is just as important to the child's well being. Men are told to do the right thing and work to support their families [to be wallets] then deprived of their children because of that role, but still expected to be a wallet $cha ching

  • acadiantunes,

    Yes that is true children are being damaged without there fathers. A child needs both parents male & female, unfortunatley that is not always possible in reality. I think a lot of problems could be solved if ' Dishonesty ' didn't exist, but unfortunatley again it does. However it isn't quite true that all criminals come from single parent homes, there are many criminals that have both parents, it largley depends upon the parent. One damaging aspect is parts of religion.

  • I don't know about USA laws , but in Britain if a guy marries a woman, he takes on any children she has, as his children. This includes if she had ben married before and the paternal father has died. Answer, i guy does not have to enter a legal marriage with the woman. Also the rape laws in Britain, required that a woman act like a man and get violent back ( this imposement was put on women from men, as this is all that could be understood), however, we now have aggressive women as a result.

  • here here, 92359hg, you're a very intelligent person

  • You know, I only recently started questioning this whole female bias, and your videos contain a lot of very interesting material. Thank you for posting.

  • I could of sworn per-jury is against the law oh forgot its a woman

  • Well done. The Prager soundbite was also spot on.

  • good one!!

  • I have no problem puting a lot of blame on feminists for many things but we have to stop blaming feminists for everything. We should declare war on all these men out there who insist on giving all this dam chilvalry to women. These men make me sick !!!

  • Stop thinking about it that way. I go about my daily activities and hold doors open for both men and women because I would rather be polite and courteous than some inconsiderate prick who let's doors slam in other people's faces, as has happened to me many times because I'm a man.

  • We have something in common bud.

  • never let a door slam in anybody's face thinking that i believe in that. I meant a lot of male judges in family courts and some politicians ETC sorry for not making that clear

  • oh figuratively speaking, yeah laws are unfair to make the majority vote happy so that politicians can get elected or re-elected.

  • I agree those chivalric self- haters need to realize that they're doing far more harm than good, and whether they like it or not, the claims of our oppression are true, the evidence is all over the place, and emasculating shame tactics from either gender, will no longer be tolerated.

  • Agreed, acadiantunes, and I also think that ninja has a point as well, we need to put chivalry to rest and just be courteous to everyone.

  • Great work! "Parents' wrongdoing." How ffffing pathetic. Love the microphone! If all men stand up...we will be free.

  • irregarless 7:08 lol!

  • That poor guy. First he's trying to come to terms with the fact his children aren't his and his wife betrayed him, then he gets hit with a ruling like that. Feminism is really pissing on us and they're not going to stop they're just going to keep pissing as long as they can and the "patriarchy" will just keep passing their laws. In the end the pendulum going back the other way might just have to be Islam. Maybe women have to be in burquas before men have rights again.

  • Feminists are short sighted fools. Every human civilization has been based and maintained by the men of that language group protecting the women of that language group, from foreign invaders. But since the internet, makes language translation fluent for all people, there stops needing to be protection for them. We hear now what they say in every tongue. "Me, me, me!" I've become complaisant to the idea of foreigners wanting our women. The can rape 'em all day long, 24/7, if they want.

  • I'm sick of being a slave-soldier who can drafted to fight other slave-soldiers, just to protect some people who despise me. Females are for children. Just talk to other species. Men from around the world and cast aside the country system, and be like we were 8000 years ago. One species, with women no longer dominating every aspect of society. Death to chivalry. It's an illusion we created to have women who could speak our languages around. What do they say that is valuable to mankind?

  • I agree with you, I wouldn't defend them from a damn thing now that we've seen over the last 30 years there attitude to us. Everything is about how stupid we are, how we just won't shape up, how evil and bad we are. And all while white washing their own behaviour and exalting themselves. Oh and of course still going on about how it's all just about equality and respect for everyone. What a fucking joke. Why don't they just say they're enjoying fucking us?

  • 2. They are completely happy to kick us out of parenting after divorce like we're nothing more than dogs (while of course ranting about dead beat dads). Their contempt for and dismissal of men as fathers, or any kind of adult (teachers etc), is just total. Yet we must step up for them if things get shitty with foreigners? Fuck 'em. I'd watch them getting burqued and just carry on with my curry.

  • I notice that nobody really complains that women still aren't allowed to serve in combat zones.

  • Honestly I really couldn't care about women not being able to serve in a combat zone, simply because I think war is lame to begin with.

  • I wonder why so many of us are on the same page but aren't united.

  • I know but I saw a video by pinegrove33 once and he talked about how guys trying to organise a male group on a university campus fared. Their meeting was invaded and they were basically shut down by a feminist bunch of jumped up little Hitlers the very first time they got together. And all they were doing was organising beer parties but dared call themselves masculinists or something. Even if just having a joke any male group has to be "vetted".

  • Men have to take charge though.

    The problem is women are always getting what they want just by complaining so if guys do something they're made out to be the bad guys. We have to elevate ourselves above their propaganda.

    Every group that has suffered oppression had to face some sort of violent opposition or something... notice how all women had to do was cry about it?

  • I often wonder that myself

  • ----I think you are undervaluing the effect of the marrage and the choices made and lived within it. If the kids are in their teens at the time of the couple's separation, then the father has accepted them as his own. The DNA results, though interesting, are irrelevent.

  • You are a brainwashed mangina with no testicles.

  • ----Maybe, but at least I have found a page- and an author- I can do without.

  • Spoken like true feminist scum. I truly hope you never get the chance to parent a child, because you are willing to raise one on lies, so much as to lie to everyone about not only the childs real father, but also the very foundation the husband-wife relationship is based upon. And you still have the nerve to say the father should pay the mother money, when he himself was mislead for an entire marriage! Some people are only alive because it's illegal to kill them.

  • zep,

    I was going to come back and school sheba but I can see that you have it WELL in hand. TY.

  • "If the kids are in their teens at the time of the couple's separation, then the father has accepted them as his own."

    Yes, under false pretense. Most people call that fraud.

  • ---While we asign parenthood by DNA, other means are also used. The purpose of marriage is to produce and provide for legitimate offspring. The idea that DNA is the sole test of legitimacy is crazy. DNA is but a tool, and a very recent one at that. The goal here is the proper raising of society's offspring. That's why there is marriage. That's why there is adoption.

  • ---Lets flip this:

    A couple gets divorced after nine years of marriage & having one son. Both want custody. Then DNA says the boy is not the husband's offspring. Does the husband lose all parental rights?

    -----As a further step, would you say the husband's feelings were no longer valid?

  • "The goal here is the proper raising of society's offspring."

    If that's the case why isn't automatic joint custody the default setting in child custody court? Children generally turn out a lot healthier in every way if they still have as much contact as possible with both parents. So why are so many men reduced to a visit a every week or even two weeks and have no protection under the law if the woman just decides she won't honour even that? Why is it shaped so completely unequally?

  • ----My point is this issue issue is a lot more complex than simply adopting DNA testing as the sole standard by which parenthood is determined.

    ---I can not begin to comment on the other point(s) you attempted to raise. They are delt with on a state by state basis.

  • Interesting fact: Children are much more likely to engage in, to use a blanket term, anti-social behaviour if they've been raised by a single mother. Basically, a boy raised by a single mother is ten times more likely to go to prison.

  • So let's just assign every bastard child to a man and force him to be the father. Sound good? Why should a man decide if he should be a parent or not? It's not like men are women who have choice. I really hope you're kidding. It's people like you who make me think we should have mandatory paternity tests for every birth.

  • The ease of genetic analysis these days suggests mandatory tests might not be a bad idea. Clinics report that about 10% of the children they test are calling the wrong man "dad". But hey, women don't cheat, only slimy men do that. What a shameful lie we perpetuate.

  • -----Can you handel this cutting both ways? If parental responsibility is set by DNA tests will those same tests also dettermine parental rights?

  • ----Did I say that? Or did I talk about Marriage and adoption?

  • your "comedy of errors" at the end was hilarious!

  • Only a women & a mangina could of made a ruling like this

  • I find it absolutely obscene that that man was not only tricked into raising children that were not his own for sixteen years, but that the judge actually forced him to continue paying to support them.

    If anything, the mother should have been ordered to pay damages to her ex-husband for all the years he put into raising them when they shouldn't have even been his responsibility in the first place.

  • Giant Mircrophones FTW

  • Are you a very small man, or is that a monstorous microphone?!

  • If you have a way of explaining your masculinist anti porn/prostitution stance, without promoting the virtues of a facist dictatorist, I'd love to hear it.

  • For me freedoom, and that "masonic constitution" have an inate immeasurable value. Theres no use arguing with facists, just like radical feminists. Once again, I may have been prepared to examine your anti porn views, but you managed to fuck it by advocating facism. Tisk, Tisk, Tisk. I didn't know this movement attracted people like you. Very sad.

  • Mate, you almost had me going there, you really did. Until I saw you fingering the jews as the source of evil, and promoting a facist dictatorship. However ignorant my comment may have seemed, its just to bad that your good message had to be tainted with this despotic shit.

  • You seem a lot more nervous than usual this vid. :-)

    I've come up against the notion of "Underrepresentation" a few times now and I ask them if they know what they are actually saying.

    I point out that a lawyer Represents you. They argue your best interest.

    Women are exceptionally well Represented in politics by Men. They are just not doing the RepresentING.

    I'd be completely happy if a group of Women in politics were representing in my favor - I'd be stoked and grateful.

  • Maybe because I am reading the screen and not looking into the camera.

  • They say this man was the only father the children knew and that's why he must pay child support...

    Why does that matter?

    If this is a normal divorce, the man has very little or no time allowed with his children, so they wouldn't know him any longer.

    The children should be allowed to choose who they go with, not automatically assigned to the mother.

    fuck that.

    Be an Equalist.

    Not a Feminist.

  • Indeed he was tricked into fatherhood if he knew they werent his to begin with and then chose to be their father it would be different.

  • I was watching a forum talk show a few months ago where they were speaking about marriage, they had a feminist speaker who would constantly bring up that women needed more power concerning divorce, I wish I could find that show on the net I think you would have liked it.

  • The family courts are just a way for the divorce industry to take money out of mens pockets. Its a system of plunder plain and simple.

  • So then, society sees men as the ones who have to be in debt when it's not even theirs.

  • Women may be better at taking care of children than men, but men are sure as hell better at raising children than women. This is because men are more discipline-oriented. Feminists are pretty ignorant to not have realized just how much they have been hurting children by glorifying single motherhood.

  • 16 years is a piece of cake. Imagine if the kids were 2 or 3 and you had the burdon of CS on your back for the next 15 years.

  • he was already paying for 16yrs he found out when they were 16 with a dna test

  • "he was already paying for 16yrs he found out when they were 16 with a dna test"

    - so they were split up when they were were babies?

  • No i dont recall when they split up but the wife cheated on him during the marriage and she told the children were his after a few years they got divorced and he was paying cs but she wanted more then he wanted dna test then they found out and she susupected the children werent his i read the artical weeks ago dont remember it all anymore.

  • Imagine the countless guys (like here in Canada) that idiotically hook up with chicks for 2 years or more that have young kids.

    Automatic child support (even if he gets booted after 2 years) until the kids are 18 + 50% of whatever their university tuition is.

    The system = 1 big anti male assrape.

  • You know what else is in "the children's best interest" other than the all mighty dollar? The tradittional nuclear family !! Not having a divorce, not denying dad proper access when divorced ETC ETC Im ashamed of my province more than i can put into words. I hope men start doing the same to women now that women are earning money. "It's for the children"?????? FUCK OFF

  • "celibacy never sounded so good" I hear you on that one. Regular visits with a high class prostitute is much more enjoyable, and less expensive then any of these nightmare forays. Your penalty for breaking the law will probobly be less to than if your girlfriend or wife picks ups the phone and sobs. Your also guanteed to atleast have a woman who pretends to like you, will service you sexually, and you already know what kind of woman she is, no need for her or you to pretend she's virtuous.

  • N.O.W. would just love a female in the cabinet, wouldn't they? Especially if she'd be a radical feminist that can help further most of their agendas.

    It's funny how the government is letting this happen, when the system is clearly a farce, and a lot of women are clearly asking for nothing less than everything they want, a thrown of power, and everything with no/lesser penalties to them.

    Anyone who says Feminism is for equal rights is a fool. Don't let anyone fool you too.

  • It can only go on for so long. It will get to the point where men will have no choice than to take away the woman's right to vote.

  • She should have to pay him back for every penny he gave her if you ask me.

  • its not the mans fault that the woman was a whore..

  • ----Did you know this couple? How do you know what did or didn't motivate these two people?

  • These sort of judgements really shouldn't be allowed to happen in todays environment.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more