ITS OFFICIAL!!!I now despise Barack Obama as much as George W. Bush1He refuses to appoint a special prosecutor to punish Bush for his illegal WIRE TAPPING and TORTURING ways.Its becoming real clear that our government tortured detainees not for information but for forced confessions2He's NOT pushing for Single Payer Health Care3He's killing innocent civilians in Afghanistan and is killing Americans troops in these failed 2 wars he refuses to end.He's just another BITCH of Dick Cheney.God help us
I agree with this guy! You measure her "achievements" as being a winner? Nude pix, lying? She can have her opinion, that is not the point. She lied and I don't feel she properly represents my state. All gays should picket every function she attends. That would send Trump the message.
Isn't David Shuster the same guy that compared Chelsea Clinton to a prostitute by saying that the Hillary Clinton campaign was "pimping" her out? This guy is clearly misogynist, sexist, whatever you want to call it. Why he or Mr. Hilton is in a position to pass judgment on this, or any woman is beyond me.
You asked: "Why he or Mr. Hilton is in a position to pass judgment on this, or any woman is beyond me."
I don't now about Schuster but in the case of Perez Hilton he is an actual judge on the pageant and that's what gave him the "position to pass judgment."
your username fits your comment quite well. He wasn't saying her gay marriage opinion was superficial, he was saying the series of events that happened proved that the contest has no real integrity if she won despite violating the rules even in the eye of the public
AIA: "Right. And OJ didn't do it, right? I'm sure this has nothing to do with her controversial statement. Honestly, think for yourself! Thanks for recognizing my clever login name."
Im not sure how OJ comes into play, nor did I assert that the anchors dont hold their own views about her opinion.
I didn't think it was an intellectual leap to see that Shuster is pointing out the fact she won despite breaking the rules, regardless of her opinions, but clearly you're apathetic towards the "rules"
So you agree that Shuster's reaction of "can i vomit now?" is a result of a politically charged outrage as a direct result from her opinion on gay marriage?
Well im sure he wasnt happy about her answer and is fired up about it but his point about the competition still stands regardless of his thoughts about gay marriage;
that the competition holds no integrity if the winner is found in violation of the rules and is allowed to retain their position. This is the point he makes.
Im sure he wasn't happy with her gay marriage answer, but that is besides his main point which is she violated the rules and suffered no consequences for her actions.
Well yes obviously, I never denied that, nevertheless he is right in his original point that the contest turned out to be a sham. Im confused as to why you'd expect him to be as apathetic as yourself & what your actual point is.
His point was the contest was a sham, and therefore he doesn't approve of it.
How is that
#1) wrong
#2) even related to his opinion on gay marriage?
Even if he shared her views on gay marriage his point would still be valid, so im not sure what your getting at here.
I'm glad we agree that his opinion was fueled out of distaste for her answer, but his job is to report news and not state opinions. It is journalism ethics 101. We're all human and sometimes we can't stop it, but to phrase it as "can I vomit now?" is unprofessional and unethical. This unethical behavior is a direct result of his blind ideology to a pornographic news organization. He has no place in objective news.
Really? I had to spell it out like that? Did you go to a public high school?
To see that rules were violated without consequence is wrong. Shuster was simply pointing out that this is wrong and actually cares, its not his opinion, its just morality. You are using the same argument people who defend torture use; that its a matter of opinion, regardless of all that "right/wrong & true/false" business.
If you want to see unprofessional watch o reilly shout down a guest or glen beck photoshop fangs onto obama. Wow. Glad your non public school left you so enlightened
lol, don't you worry! I've been articulating this argument for years now. Mainly in face to face debates. I prefer it. I enjoy watching the blood drain from someone's face as I put them in their place. *sigh* I just can't get that from a computer screen...
We all understand, but there is no lack of objectivity here, like I had said, shuster does state the facts of what happened.
He just also comments that breaking the rules and remaining the winner is wrong and despicable. This does not detract from his report as it is an obvious truth, nor is it his opinion, it is just a fact: Breaking the rules is wrong.
Its hard to take you seriously at this point anyways after what you said about Bill O'Reilly. His avg. viewer is 71 years old, cmon now.
Not to mention O'Reilly unlike Shuster says things that are blatantly false or flat out lies, and then never fails to give his opinion on the matter, which seems to be the very issue that you are trying to argue against. He is continuously disproven and never retracts his statements or owns up to his lies.
Personally I think Its more important that you at least get the facts right on your network than just making sure that you dont agree out loud that breaking the rules is wrong
Who the hell are these three assclowns???? the guy in this vid is a freaking joke, And why don't they hold Obama to the same scrutiny??? he said the very same thing about marriage, where were these three tools!????
Wow I actually disagree with Shuster for once. If anything these pageants should be even MORE superficial! Clearly the likes of Prejean are dumb bimbos so why burden them with difficult questions? It's called a BEAUTY contest for god's sake it's supposed to be superficial!
Carrie certainly being hot, can't possibly be the hottest Cali has to offer so that would be another bonus, and I very much doubt the any other potential candidates could be any dumber either for those concerned.
Nah she's a dumb bimbo because she preaches about respect while going on the 700 club, and does a monologue about freedom of speech and what her grandfather fought for when that has NOTHING to do with a beauty pageant or having your opinions be above criticism. I wasn't bothered by her answer at Perez's dumb question though. But yes she is a dumb bimbo.
No honestly I am not bothered by her answer. The first one I attacked on this story when it broke was that assclown Perez Hilton who is worthless scum if I ever saw it. However I AM bothered by her holier than thou hypocrisy(Pat Robertson? REALLY?) and the fact that she went out of her way to become a prop for NOM or that gay storm thingy. That did indeed piss me off,
Where does she come of talking about respect while whoring herself to NOM with the ad about "The gays are coming! And I am AFRAID!"
Even though it's funny that evangelicals would embrace an idol who built a career on vanity and the lust of men (seven sins who CARES! Leviticus is what the Bible is all about!) and has no problems flashing her nice fake tittles for the camera I'm also more bothered than amused by that. I'm used to evangelicals being hypocrites that isn't entertaining anymore.
Thank you! Hey your profile makes it clear you are a fan so you elevating me to her level how can I not take that as a compliment?
I have reasonably explained why I don't like her. I reserve my right to call her a dumb bimbo, her grandpappy killed all the Nazi's just so I could gosh darnit! Don't criticize me for it! This is NOT supposed to happen in America!
Oh lighten up will you! Don't act all pissy because I don't like your idol. I bet I hate Perez as much as you do so we can be bestest friends after all!
thenoblequran (Ctrl+Enter)
Islamfromallah 1 year ago
shut up bitch suck this
michaellovesthecat 1 year ago
liberals make me sick, but damn contessa brewer is hott.
TheZamminator 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ITS OFFICIAL!!!I now despise Barack Obama as much as George W. Bush1He refuses to appoint a special prosecutor to punish Bush for his illegal WIRE TAPPING and TORTURING ways.Its becoming real clear that our government tortured detainees not for information but for forced confessions2He's NOT pushing for Single Payer Health Care3He's killing innocent civilians in Afghanistan and is killing Americans troops in these failed 2 wars he refuses to end.He's just another BITCH of Dick Cheney.God help us
onerpone 2 years ago
AMEN my friend!!! Awesome comment, definetely not spam. These people are sheep.
WorldBFree2006 2 years ago
I agree with this guy! You measure her "achievements" as being a winner? Nude pix, lying? She can have her opinion, that is not the point. She lied and I don't feel she properly represents my state. All gays should picket every function she attends. That would send Trump the message.
Tones4me 2 years ago 2
tones: She lied and I don't feel she properly represents my state
She represents the views of Californians who have voted against homosexual marriage twice in 8 years, in line with the vast majority of Americans.
If you don't like it then move to Canada.
Garysher2 2 years ago
Yup...and angry that his ratings are below anemic.
You would think these libs would be happy as shit right now, since they control everything, and the GOP is supposedly dead and buried...
...But yet theyre obsessed with destroying a beauty queen, and Sarah Palin's daughter...
I think theyre a lot less confident in their positions then they seem :) .
Maybe they realize the middle of the country isnt buying their crap.
bucs2921 2 years ago
LMAO @ Girly man Shuster whining about a beauty pageant..
Shut your sass hole, little man.
bucs2921 2 years ago
Isn't David Shuster the same guy that compared Chelsea Clinton to a prostitute by saying that the Hillary Clinton campaign was "pimping" her out? This guy is clearly misogynist, sexist, whatever you want to call it. Why he or Mr. Hilton is in a position to pass judgment on this, or any woman is beyond me.
sickleman5 2 years ago
You asked: "Why he or Mr. Hilton is in a position to pass judgment on this, or any woman is beyond me."
I don't now about Schuster but in the case of Perez Hilton he is an actual judge on the pageant and that's what gave him the "position to pass judgment."
laleeloolelo 2 years ago
nice pwn
sbwsk8er 2 years ago
what exactly is the outrage?
an annoying gay guy asked a gay marriage question to your typical hypocritical bible thumping/nude posing/bimbo.
freak show. please america, lets move on now.
mostecri 2 years ago
Shuster is just pissed he is not Miss California.
1reimhard 2 years ago
superficial? She gave an honest answer and didn't pander. Seems pretty real to me. MSNBC is to news as alcoholism is to driving.
ApathyInAction 2 years ago
your username fits your comment quite well. He wasn't saying her gay marriage opinion was superficial, he was saying the series of events that happened proved that the contest has no real integrity if she won despite violating the rules even in the eye of the public
dlindstadt 2 years ago
AIA: "Right. And OJ didn't do it, right? I'm sure this has nothing to do with her controversial statement. Honestly, think for yourself! Thanks for recognizing my clever login name."
Im not sure how OJ comes into play, nor did I assert that the anchors dont hold their own views about her opinion.
I didn't think it was an intellectual leap to see that Shuster is pointing out the fact she won despite breaking the rules, regardless of her opinions, but clearly you're apathetic towards the "rules"
dlindstadt 2 years ago
So you agree that Shuster's reaction of "can i vomit now?" is a result of a politically charged outrage as a direct result from her opinion on gay marriage?
ApathyInAction 2 years ago
Well im sure he wasnt happy about her answer and is fired up about it but his point about the competition still stands regardless of his thoughts about gay marriage;
that the competition holds no integrity if the winner is found in violation of the rules and is allowed to retain their position. This is the point he makes.
Im sure he wasn't happy with her gay marriage answer, but that is besides his main point which is she violated the rules and suffered no consequences for her actions.
dlindstadt 2 years ago
so you admit that partially his comment was politically charged as a result from her answer?
Do you think, as a news anchor during a news program and not a commentary program, he should be stating opinions in such a way?
ApathyInAction 2 years ago
Well yes obviously, I never denied that, nevertheless he is right in his original point that the contest turned out to be a sham. Im confused as to why you'd expect him to be as apathetic as yourself & what your actual point is.
His point was the contest was a sham, and therefore he doesn't approve of it.
How is that
#1) wrong
#2) even related to his opinion on gay marriage?
Even if he shared her views on gay marriage his point would still be valid, so im not sure what your getting at here.
dlindstadt 2 years ago
I'm glad we agree that his opinion was fueled out of distaste for her answer, but his job is to report news and not state opinions. It is journalism ethics 101. We're all human and sometimes we can't stop it, but to phrase it as "can I vomit now?" is unprofessional and unethical. This unethical behavior is a direct result of his blind ideology to a pornographic news organization. He has no place in objective news.
Really? I had to spell it out like that? Did you go to a public high school?
ApathyInAction 2 years ago
To see that rules were violated without consequence is wrong. Shuster was simply pointing out that this is wrong and actually cares, its not his opinion, its just morality. You are using the same argument people who defend torture use; that its a matter of opinion, regardless of all that "right/wrong & true/false" business.
If you want to see unprofessional watch o reilly shout down a guest or glen beck photoshop fangs onto obama. Wow. Glad your non public school left you so enlightened
dlindstadt 2 years ago
O'Reilly is one of the last few remaining true journalists. The market has spoken for the last 100 months that they trust him.
Do you really believe Shuster actually cares this much about beauty pageants? Really?
ApathyInAction 2 years ago
"Do you think, as a news anchor during a news program and not a commentary program, he should be stating opinions in such a way?"
Where have you been the last 13 years?
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
lol, don't you worry! I've been articulating this argument for years now. Mainly in face to face debates. I prefer it. I enjoy watching the blood drain from someone's face as I put them in their place. *sigh* I just can't get that from a computer screen...
ApathyInAction 2 years ago
@Apathy
"O'Reilly is one of the last few remaining true journalists. The market has spoken for the last 100 months that they trust him"
You complaining about commentary in journalism? Tell me you're joking?
ipbalkenende 2 years ago 3
I'm complaining about the lack of objectivity during a hard news report. Tell me you understand?
ApathyInAction 2 years ago
We all understand, but there is no lack of objectivity here, like I had said, shuster does state the facts of what happened.
He just also comments that breaking the rules and remaining the winner is wrong and despicable. This does not detract from his report as it is an obvious truth, nor is it his opinion, it is just a fact: Breaking the rules is wrong.
Its hard to take you seriously at this point anyways after what you said about Bill O'Reilly. His avg. viewer is 71 years old, cmon now.
dlindstadt 2 years ago
Not to mention O'Reilly unlike Shuster says things that are blatantly false or flat out lies, and then never fails to give his opinion on the matter, which seems to be the very issue that you are trying to argue against. He is continuously disproven and never retracts his statements or owns up to his lies.
Personally I think Its more important that you at least get the facts right on your network than just making sure that you dont agree out loud that breaking the rules is wrong
dlindstadt 2 years ago 2
Who the hell are these three assclowns???? the guy in this vid is a freaking joke, And why don't they hold Obama to the same scrutiny??? he said the very same thing about marriage, where were these three tools!????
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago
Wow I actually disagree with Shuster for once. If anything these pageants should be even MORE superficial! Clearly the likes of Prejean are dumb bimbos so why burden them with difficult questions? It's called a BEAUTY contest for god's sake it's supposed to be superficial!
Carrie certainly being hot, can't possibly be the hottest Cali has to offer so that would be another bonus, and I very much doubt the any other potential candidates could be any dumber either for those concerned.
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
Dumb Bimbos? Cus she said something you didn't want to hear? Real mature that'll certainly help your cause. Name calling. nice.....
JayDG6385 2 years ago
Nah she's a dumb bimbo because she preaches about respect while going on the 700 club, and does a monologue about freedom of speech and what her grandfather fought for when that has NOTHING to do with a beauty pageant or having your opinions be above criticism. I wasn't bothered by her answer at Perez's dumb question though. But yes she is a dumb bimbo.
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
Suit yourself but remember you ain't gonna be helping your cause with the name calling. Yes you are bothered by her answer.
JayDG6385 2 years ago
@Jay
No honestly I am not bothered by her answer. The first one I attacked on this story when it broke was that assclown Perez Hilton who is worthless scum if I ever saw it. However I AM bothered by her holier than thou hypocrisy(Pat Robertson? REALLY?) and the fact that she went out of her way to become a prop for NOM or that gay storm thingy. That did indeed piss me off,
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
Where does she come of talking about respect while whoring herself to NOM with the ad about "The gays are coming! And I am AFRAID!"
Even though it's funny that evangelicals would embrace an idol who built a career on vanity and the lust of men (seven sins who CARES! Leviticus is what the Bible is all about!) and has no problems flashing her nice fake tittles for the camera I'm also more bothered than amused by that. I'm used to evangelicals being hypocrites that isn't entertaining anymore.
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
Yeah and you calling her names is making you a hell of alot better than her. Much "respect".
JayDG6385 2 years ago
Thank you! Hey your profile makes it clear you are a fan so you elevating me to her level how can I not take that as a compliment?
I have reasonably explained why I don't like her. I reserve my right to call her a dumb bimbo, her grandpappy killed all the Nazi's just so I could gosh darnit! Don't criticize me for it! This is NOT supposed to happen in America!
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
Hey you can keep on but your just showing how immature you're being so knock yourself out I ain't stoppin ya.
JayDG6385 2 years ago
Oh lighten up will you! Don't act all pissy because I don't like your idol. I bet I hate Perez as much as you do so we can be bestest friends after all!
ipbalkenende 2 years ago
Me pissy? You're the one calling her names and shit. lol
JayDG6385 2 years ago
Yeah that's true, but aside from that I mean.
ipbalkenende 2 years ago