That Eclipse is not twin turbo... Its stock at that. Did you see how it got off the line? That right there shows you, and then how quick the camaro ran it down..... if that Ecipse was turbo then the Camaro wouldnt have had a chance in hell.
@Theskateboarderguy I have a real car its called a camaro z28 and nos is nitrous oxide system don't be a fool nothing with fast and the furious moron. If you wanna techmivally talk about a real car ill out up a video of my 1962 Corvette and that's a 100% real car not a cute little ricer toy
@guerofresa i think you missed something. the vid was uploaded in 06 not 96. i think u got thrown off by the desription that says 96 camaro. nice cars btw
Quite frankly I think turbos, superchargers, and nos are cheap ways to win. It's all about what the engine can do but always fun to add shit to burn some rubber on whatever car XD
Since when does it make sense to twin turbo charge a GSX? It wouldn't be very efficient, one turbo is enough...I have only seen it done once....with a lot of expense and very little in return. I'd like to see the engine and see actual dyno run before believing this...That run looks like about a 12 second run...any good tuner can make a GSX do that easily. I only speak from experience though...not the great wealth of knowledge that I see represented here...
@booofy Well the theory is that two turbos would produce some less lag and more torque at lowRPM. If you want response, you need a good torque before a good power top end. If you can afford a lighter turbo for fast starting, and a heavier one for "take off", then you may get the best result. Built on a 4 cylinders, it seems a good thing. But it is expensive... and a simple big turbo + Synchronic POV (to air bypass) seems also to give good results.
I have a 1994 Camaro Z28 its a great car and i love it. Im thinking about trading for a mitsubishi eclipse gsx. Would it be a good trade? can anyone tell me the pros and cons of the gsx? it would be much appreciated. Im trying to get opinions.
@tbktm Pros : AWD, Cheap to make fast, Good das milage, Can run 10s and still get great MPG, Sexy as hell, Turbocharged, did i mention AWD?
Cons: You will get bagged on for a 4cyl, nothing beats the sound of a SBC, if you spin you break a T-case (get a John Shep Tcase problem cured), Not super reliable, have to change oil alot due to turbo.
@thebeholder19 dude look at my name.........I know pretty much everything there is to know about DSM. I also know that this GSX was pretty much stock just a BOV and maybe hard pipes possile a 14b (i would hope) and i have personally seen a Bone stock GSX with just a 14b run a 14.0 in the 1/4 true the camaro dude cant drive but he lost to a GSX he has and excuse AWD is hard to beat off the line and catch if you mess up like that in a Stock Z28/SS
@corniea1 PEOPLE CRACK ME UP WHEN THEY PULL THAT TWIN TURBO CRAP ON THEIR 4 CYLINDER CARS.... IVE BEEN AROUND CARS ALL MY LIFE AND I HAVE NEVER EVER EVA EVA SEEN ONE WIT BI TURBO ...... RA-TARDS
@sickcamaroZ28 are you blind? The GSX whopped his ass, the only reason the Camaro ended up ahead was because the GSX let off the gas so the dumb ass in the Camaro wouldnt head on a big rig
not twin turbo... its nice.. but not a twin turbo.. my 16g talon pulls alot more.... i kicked a maro SS in the ass after giving him the launch last night hahaha... claimed to run 10s but i run 12 soooooo not bad for a $2000 ship...
Haha. I was looking t the same thing. I only know of one in the DSM community.. and I believe he's making around 600hp and hits 10lbs around 2500rpm off the smaller turbine.
Haha. I was looking t the same thing. I only know of one in the DSM community.. and I believe he's making around 600hp and hits 10lbs around 2500rpm off the smaller turbine.
@EXiS091 why the fuck you pussy r dreaming???????????????????????????????????????? dosn't make sense hahahaha cant have a v8????? or dont want a v8?!! second one sounds more like it lol why want a v8 if i shit 70% of v8 in my town in my 4 banger.....you'll run out of gas before you catch up to me haha whats the MPG ON YOUR V8? 12?? LOL
evos are the same shity durability like subarus and even worse if you put heavy power on them best engines over all are the v8s fuck what others say they need to grow up older to understand what im talking about .
there is no way that thing is running a twin or a compound turbo set-up. With my compound set-up I have a turbonetics t4 60-1 turbo and mhi e3b16g and i am making 675 hp and 592 lb/ft torque and am running high low 9 and if its a 1/4 mile from where they started to the light he ran it in 15 seconds thats a stock time whoever made this vid is a retard........ DSM rules muscle
i don't think that eclipse was boosted i have ran them when my z28 was stock and they hang right in there till 40 or so before i really started to pull away... though i did have 273 rear gear at the time
you all import haters. If you didn't know, Crysler was helping Mitsubishi build cars during 80s-90s. They even designed an engine for Mitsubishi. I drive 94 mitsu and it falls a part. Because i drive cryseler with mitsubishi logo on it.
Listen I am not a a complete idiot when it comes to cars or modification but if I'm not mistaken there are more factors that go into a fast cars begin fast then just the size of the motor, with that being said the motor plays a very large roll in the definition of what is a fast car, also things to factor in are the power to weight ratio, gearing, torque, among with a few others. And when it comes to racing said cars, if you can't drive you 400-500 hp car then that power isn't really going to
Look I have an 82 camaro. and I will say an eclipse would kick its ass, especially from 60 mph and up. this race isn't really fair because its an LS1 chevy vs a four cylinder Eclipse. thats alot less smaller motor. Jap cars are way better for daily drivers and have tremendous power for just a 4 cylinder.. The 80's and 90's camaros with 4 cylinders and v6's aren't worth a shit, but the LS1 motor is fast, but its a V8
@TheAstonMartian would you rather spend 40k on a little 4 cylinder turbo and get 300hp or would you rather spend 30-40k and get a v-8 (with twice the potential) with 400+hp?
@Lestkn2 Well, it does point me towards the engineering. Knowing that the STi can do so much with only 4 cylinders makes it that much more attractive. I am pretty sure that a V10 engine is even more powerful, and better than a V8 having more power, but for a four cylinder car, would yo not agree that at only 2.5L engine, the WRX STi is revolutionary in doing what most cars couldn't? I find it amazing since so much power comes from so little. The Mustang comparatively should be in supercar level.
@TheAstonMartian you think you are so smart .v-8s, they are easy to build and maintain.if you spend the same $ on a 4 banger as you do a v-8 then the v-8 wins every time. 4 cylinder can never compete with a v-8 . 4 bangers are for kids.
@Lestkn2 I am not smart. If I had as much knowledge about you as cars on engine, and suspension, then I would be glad. However, I am not dumb enough to deny that 300 hp on a four cylinder version is a rarity, and does baffle me because of so much in so little. I like V8's, but I am not biased, or even stereotypical over cylinders. Subaru looks boy racerish, but they are fast, and did beat other cars on several factors. That's all.
@TheAstonMartian im not stereotypical either. its no surprise that a 4banger gives you 300hp when a 8 banger gives you 600hp just as easy . where you can make a 4cylinder car 800hp , you can make a 8 cylinder 1600hp. even better why dont you try 8000hp 8 cylinders.. 4 cylinders cannot make nowhere near half of that without blowing up. does that baffle you any?
@Lestkn2 Thank you for understanding. A 4 banger giving 300 hp amazes me, because it takes less gas to give you that much power. A V8 is good, and all, but until recently, it was hard to buy a V8 which gave you that much power. The Mustang GT until 2010 only had 311 or so hp. Now, the Camaro SS, and Mustang GT have more power, but even then it does not come with 600 hp on stock versions. Getting more power from engine can be expensive too through mods, instead of stock.
@Lestkn2 no. considering the v8's put on top fuel dragsters are running off of nitromethane not gasoline or even e85 and they need to be rebuilt after every pass. talk about blowing up. how about a 1600hp eclipse running 7's in a 1/4 mile... does that baffle you? lol. it does me.
@mambacx u cant drive those kind of 7 second cars on the road . there are built up v8s that you can drive on the road that are 2000hp. do you ever watch any gt racing and see the v-8s fly by those little fag cars because they are slow. you need to move out of your grandmas basement and grow up.
@Lestkn2 never said it was road worthy only that it still had an origanal chassis from the firewall back. thats impressive. and i love american v8's as much as anyone else. however im not a narrow minded idiot who thinks there way is the highway. if you think you need 8 cylinders to be fast... then so be it. i'll just sit back and watch them go in a striaght line...
@Lestkn2 Mullet man, your POS v8 is screaming for you to go fix it cause the damn thing breaks everyday. So grab a busch light, sit down, slice your wrists and watch nascar. People like you give domestic leg humpers a bad name. I own both a 78 el camino, a 86 regal t-type, and a 95 Eagle talon and must say out of all of them, I love the 4 cylinder for it's mod friendly engine. I love the V6 for its ability to make great power, and still get good gas mileage, love the elcamino for sound.
@RichRusso4218 if i was the type to watch nascar and to wear a mullet i would also drive a 78 el camino. 86 regal ? you got to be kidding me . maybe when you get a real v-8 a drive it you will then grow up and be a man..
@mambacx Actually it is a 1200hp dsm running 7's and a 1600 hp one running 6's. Fastest 4 cylinder in the world. They keep restricting him in classes and he still sets world records.
@TheAstonMartian A subaru is garbage, they make power but for only a few weeks before their motors have enough. I tune Subarus and Evo's and DSM's pretty much weekly and so far all the subaru's making 500hp have blown up in a few months after being tuned. Perfect A/R's, perfect mapping and they just can't handle it. Evo's are beast's on the other hand, they are tried and proven motors.
@RichRusso4218 Hmm. What do you do with all that power though. A Subaru makes 300 hp which is plenty fast for the engine, does good cornering, can seat five people, and is a rally car. I am not sure if a Mustang can do all that effectively. Sure you can make faster, but a skyline is also fast with 1000 hp. Also only so much time is spent actually racing. Mostly, day to day drive-ability comes into play.
@Lestkn2 IDK where you buy your parts but with 2K I can pull out 300HP out of a DSM. 5K and you can get 500HP. That's buying shit brand new. Can get a DSM for about a grand for a decent one. So for 6K I will have a AWD 500HP, fuel efficient, light weight, V8 eater. Dumbass people who talk shit without knowing any knowledge of cars what so ever.
@RichRusso4218 if you find a decent eclipse for a grand i'll give you a grand. most decent dsm's start around 3800 to 4k. you want a nice upgraded one its about 6-7k, you want a nice upgraded one that has low miles you wont find one for sale unless your in the "know"
ya i have a 91 Eagle talon tsi. its running stock on 10lbs. but my friends brother built a 91 plymouth laser up to about 600 horse, running 28lbs on a t3t4 hybrid turbo, just wanna say, DSM's are fuckin sick, but they are peices of shit that break all the time. you want to build something, go with muscle. i have the talon and an 85 camaro with vids on here up and i love the camaro anyday. sounds better, looks better, and runs WAY better. just not as fast, but talon cheats by havin turbo.
@Lestkn2 ignorance isn't an excuse for ragging on 4 cylinders? my buddies rsx will beat most v-8's on the street running over 800ho to the wheels not bad for a 4 banger. let me guess you call BS i no. just look it up on youtube nrg turbo rsx by yankee81116
@JAoMC 4 cylinders are not good to make go that fast. they are not going to last.i have a stock camaro that is 300hp and another stock camaro that is 430hp with no mods so what does that tell you.
ive seen at the 2009 dsm shoot out at buschur a compound turbod eclipse. a tt setup that the supras use were a smaller turbo spools up a bigger turbo. it peaks at 40psi and is no joke look it up on here i found it under "compound turbo dsm" so you can do it!
hard to tell if its twin turbo or not. i personally know a guy with a twin turbo eclipse, although his kicks ass, and this one doesnt. he spools about 40 psi by 4400 rpms. its a red 99 gsx with white tears/stripes down the side. his name on the dsmtuner forums is 99gst_racer if you care to find him and discuss it.
dude in the camaro is a moron, he almost hit the semi head on and cut the eclipse off to get into his lane from getting hit. He should of slow down and got behind the eclipse instead of dodging the car hes racing and the semi truck. Whata way to kill yourself buddy , nice!
To avoid the AWD problem get them on a roll. Got a lightly modded GTP and it destroys them on a roll. Still take them off the line but takes around 60-70 before I start pulling past.
@TheLeeno CAI,PCM,3"downpipe,3.4"pulleys...easily take GSX's. Only $1,000 in mods on a large coupe and it's amazing what it can do. "Shit box?" GSX's and T's constantly break down, I guarantee a hell of lot more miles out of my car.
@BlackBirdv6 most dsm's? you mean the non turbo or the stock ones, what does a gtp do in the 1/4, like 16??? rofl seriously 200 hp omg a DSM has that stock and its alot lighter face it, your either dreaming or lying...
for 1 im not talking about a gtp. for 2 my little v6 does fine against TURBO dsm's, 3 last time i weighed my car it was 3100 with a full tank, my little honda is 2900 with a full tank, and i doubt a full weight fwd dsm is much lighter, and yeah its got 10 more hp than mine but mine has 11 more torque and i dont have turbo lag. and sorry buddy, but my poor little v8 only has about 150 more hp and gobs more torque and might weigh 3-400 pounds more. and personally in the v6 ive beat modded gst's.
@TheLeeno A gtp will usually do 14.9-15.0 bone stock with an average joe driving. They have 240hp 280ft lbs stock, ive seen them go as low as 14.50 stock (a 1998 daytona edition did this). Stock vs stock gsx and gtp is a very good match but a gtp might edge out a gsx at the line. For modding, gtp's can be made fast just as easily as dsm's. High 12s for about $1500 (if you do the work yourself) in a full weight 3500lb fwd automatic car, pretty impressive.
@circlelt1 um ya i read 200 hp 220 trq, so not sure where your getting your #'s, but the 15second ish, to mid 15's is about right, I dont know about 14.5 "STOCK", but I'll give it to you. GSX's are known to run low 14's "STOCK" put $200 in it and you can hit 13's, unfortunatley the GTP is a SHITbox as far as performance goes, the mistu 4g63 is WAY better of a platform, and it's a 2.0 four banger. Can you even get a gtp stick? GAY.
@TheLeeno The 200hp gtp's are the 3.4 DOHC gtp's, which got replaced by the 3800s/c in 1997. Everyone knows they are 240hp for the series 2 3800s/c. The series 1 has 205hp but those never went in gtp's, the ssei's and regals got those pre-97. The video of the stock 14.5 is on streetfire and might be on here too. The gtp is a great platform, and although they dont come with a stick, They wouldnt be any faster with a stick, its one of the few cars that are actually quicker with an auto.
@TheLeeno And in anycase ive heard of chimps getting faster than mid 15s in gtp's :P Another thing to consider if you see one running mid 15 is that they are the type of car that dont commonly get taken care of except by the occassional enthusiast.
Stop talking shit. There is a twin turbo eclipse out there. And his torque curve is monstrous. So i would just shut the fuck up. You sound stupid when you dont know what your talking about. Is this one a TT- no. The only TT eclipse was finished only a few months ago.
@crownv80 actually if you looks really hard the eclipse still lost the camaro caught him. That just shows how bad ass that camaro really is. Plua that is a GSX eclipse with AWD so if should be a big V8 RWD off the line don't ya think?
Not a TT GSX thats for sure. I have worked on plenty of eclipses and there just isn't enough room to do twin turbo. You can gain just as much power with going with a big single turbo and it's a hell of alot less of a hassle.
I agree with getalife04 as well, no point in installing a TT system when one can do the job. both drivers sucked balls, the GSX would have killed it anyway.. power over weight ratio..
@bigpeteswackshack Just depends on your preference really, small turbos spool quick BUT at the top end it doesn't have shit. For me on a WRX like I drive the best street turbo is like a VF39 or a VF22 and even a 16G or 18G turbo it's too bad either. The 18G is really the biggest you should go if it's a street car otherwise your lag will suck ass if you go bigger lol.
@getalife04 true. now heres somebody who actually knows something about cars. small (not to small though) turbos for low end torque for most street applications with no more than . but yes if your gonna run track racing you want between 16 and 18g for a higher pull and mid to high end torque
@bigpeteswackshack Yeah for wrx's the best over all street turbo is the VF39 or the VF22 hands down. Now the VF22 takes longer to spool but still spins up by 3200rpm but the VF39 (STi Turbo) spools up under 3,000 rpms and actually hold strong until 6000 rpms then it drops pretty quick for the final 7000 rpm redline. I build up these cars all the time and thats what I always recommend for everyone. Never seems to fail me lol.
@getalife04 now im a professional mechanic and i just learned something from you. its always good to commerce with other men of the trade. or woman whatever you may be. lol. ill keep that in mind cause im going back to school cause i have to renew every two years. but im going back to do import racing.
@bigpeteswackshack LOL we all learn something from time to time. One thing I have learned in messing with cars is that you NEVER know everything lol. And yeah I am all man :D. And one thing I forgot was the VF22 is a great topend turbo they hold boost very nicely in the upper range hence the slower spool up. Really it all depends on the size/flow of the motor. More mods like heads and cams and stuff you can run a bigger turbo on the street. It really just depends on what you got. As you know lol
@getalife04 the only way u can put twin turbos in it is to replace the engine with 3000gt vr 4's engine , Its possible and i know people who did that ,
@akifmafia Yeah true I have seen it as well but really the 4G63 motor is great so why go through all that hassle? The vr4 engine is good but hell I'd just buy a VR4 and save myself the hassle lol. They aren't much heavier and have better differentials. Although the transfer case in both of them sucks.
@getalife04 VR4 twin turbo engines bolt into eclipses are are V6's. 6a12tt for the gsx/gst is bolt in. 6a13tt for the rs/gs is bolt in. So twin turbo can work in eclipses.
@getdrunk1990 yeah it's not insanely difficult to do it but the way I see it why bother doing that at all? The 4G63 motor is one of the best 4 cylinders ever made. So I see no point in changing that lol.
@getalife04 a compound turbo setup I believe is the only 'twin' setup that has been done on these cars. it's possible but definitely a true TT setup is just not worth the time/bother to fit in there as you said.
The eclipse is a turbo cause you can hear the BOV and you have to have a turbo for that
theflyingdoutchmen 1 week ago
@thebeholder it's a gsx not gst dumbass. Huge difference.
xtbergen33x 2 months ago
That Eclipse is not twin turbo... Its stock at that. Did you see how it got off the line? That right there shows you, and then how quick the camaro ran it down..... if that Ecipse was turbo then the Camaro wouldnt have had a chance in hell.
XxC4S3YxXsvr 3 months ago
@XxC4S3YxXsvr Im pretty sure an lt1 camaro is faster than a turbo eclipse.
dalesocks 2 weeks ago
@dalesocks are you serious? First of all it depends on how much money you put into it. A 4banger can make light work of this pos any day
XxC4S3YxXsvr 2 weeks ago
@XxC4S3YxXsvr Thought we where comparing stock for stock. Was the point of comparing an 800hp eclipse to a stock Camaro or vice versa.
dalesocks 2 weeks ago
AWD!!! but then the camaro's horses start to kick in....
etomas6 3 months ago
That's the point/benefit of twin turbo on an inline engine? O_o
24okay 4 months ago
not twin turbo. sorry pal
MrGstatus007 5 months ago
umm ey "guerofresa"...wtf.. i don't really think this vid could possibly had been uploaded in 96.
1. i know for a fact youtube was not near close to incention in 96..
2. youtube was found in 05, so 1. is out of the pic.
3. ur an fuckin idiot for laughing at thinking u where right...
4. after u read this, u can lol at ur damn self ...
5. point proven, u can hate i don care..
oh..btw..computers where not as high tech in 96, as they are now....
lol.lol. whos laughing now....
313stratus 6 months ago
WAHOO! Twin Turbo! lol hahahahaha
jagray85 6 months ago
I don't have the shit anymore moron read the comment on it XD
bradleymoney07 6 months ago
@Theskateboarderguy I have a real car its called a camaro z28 and nos is nitrous oxide system don't be a fool nothing with fast and the furious moron. If you wanna techmivally talk about a real car ill out up a video of my 1962 Corvette and that's a 100% real car not a cute little ricer toy
bradleymoney07 6 months ago
Comment removed
torfason15 6 months ago
i havent read the comments yet but did you guys notice it says a 98 gsx when it was uploaded in 96?? wtf?? LoL
guerofresa 6 months ago
@guerofresa i think you missed something. the vid was uploaded in 06 not 96. i think u got thrown off by the desription that says 96 camaro. nice cars btw
ElegyXD 6 months ago
Quite frankly I think turbos, superchargers, and nos are cheap ways to win. It's all about what the engine can do but always fun to add shit to burn some rubber on whatever car XD
bradleymoney07 6 months ago
@bradleymoney07 did you really just say nos? stop watching fast and furious and go buy an actual car
TheSkateboarderGuy 6 months ago
Get shit on by DSM.
XxTr0llKingxX 6 months ago
Since when does it make sense to twin turbo charge a GSX? It wouldn't be very efficient, one turbo is enough...I have only seen it done once....with a lot of expense and very little in return. I'd like to see the engine and see actual dyno run before believing this...That run looks like about a 12 second run...any good tuner can make a GSX do that easily. I only speak from experience though...not the great wealth of knowledge that I see represented here...
booofy 6 months ago
@booofy Well the theory is that two turbos would produce some less lag and more torque at lowRPM. If you want response, you need a good torque before a good power top end. If you can afford a lighter turbo for fast starting, and a heavier one for "take off", then you may get the best result. Built on a 4 cylinders, it seems a good thing. But it is expensive... and a simple big turbo + Synchronic POV (to air bypass) seems also to give good results.
Seventaiji 6 months ago
I have a 1994 Camaro Z28 its a great car and i love it. Im thinking about trading for a mitsubishi eclipse gsx. Would it be a good trade? can anyone tell me the pros and cons of the gsx? it would be much appreciated. Im trying to get opinions.
tbktm 8 months ago
@tbktm dsmtuners . com will answer any and all your q's
4g63jojo 6 months ago
@tbktm what year is the gsx your looking to trade for?
sejfiu100 6 months ago
@tbktm Pros : AWD, Cheap to make fast, Good das milage, Can run 10s and still get great MPG, Sexy as hell, Turbocharged, did i mention AWD?
Cons: You will get bagged on for a 4cyl, nothing beats the sound of a SBC, if you spin you break a T-case (get a John Shep Tcase problem cured), Not super reliable, have to change oil alot due to turbo.
DSMeclipsegst 4 months ago
@DSMeclipsegst Not a twin turbo. Single turbo. The VR4 300gt's are twin turboed.
thebeholder19 4 months ago
@thebeholder19 dude look at my name.........I know pretty much everything there is to know about DSM. I also know that this GSX was pretty much stock just a BOV and maybe hard pipes possile a 14b (i would hope) and i have personally seen a Bone stock GSX with just a 14b run a 14.0 in the 1/4 true the camaro dude cant drive but he lost to a GSX he has and excuse AWD is hard to beat off the line and catch if you mess up like that in a Stock Z28/SS
DSMeclipsegst 4 months ago
@DSMeclipsegst Not to mention, lol at everyone proud of an LT1 camaro running down a mostly stock DSM.
ironbloodus 1 month ago
Twin turbo GSX. WTFE
BigNick419andholding 8 months ago
hey v8 drivers how was it telling your parents you are gay? suck my 4g63!
holsetdsm91 8 months ago
I love my DSM, but nothing beats the sound of a V8 or the look of a Camaro
BrendelxD 8 months ago
Hahahah a twin turbo GSX? uhhh i think thats a typo.
corniea1 8 months ago
@corniea1 PEOPLE CRACK ME UP WHEN THEY PULL THAT TWIN TURBO CRAP ON THEIR 4 CYLINDER CARS.... IVE BEEN AROUND CARS ALL MY LIFE AND I HAVE NEVER EVER EVA EVA SEEN ONE WIT BI TURBO ...... RA-TARDS
XW1CKED666X 8 months ago
@XW1CKED666X look up ams performance they made one
on a 4 cylinder evo a small turbo feeding a bigger one its badass
impleasen 8 months ago
@XW1CKED666X i agree with you, its pointless anyways...
Ateyurock 8 months ago
Eclipse FTW
ComputerTutorialPro 10 months ago
That camaro driver fucked up pretty bad but all that car made up for his mistake
steelcityracer1320 10 months ago
He'll ya the camaro won and it's not a tt but any1 can buy a tt kit for around 1300
sickcamaroZ28 10 months ago
@sickcamaroZ28 are you blind? The GSX whopped his ass, the only reason the Camaro ended up ahead was because the GSX let off the gas so the dumb ass in the Camaro wouldnt head on a big rig
DSMeclipsegst 4 months ago
@DSMeclipsegst Whoever drove the camaro can't fucking drive, but the camaro would definitely take the gst.
thebeholder19 4 months ago
?? Did the camaro not know he was in a race? He looked like he kinda lagged there off the line.
s14attack 10 months ago
Twin Turbo??? Wow ok sure
1214cookiemonster 10 months ago
That was a GSX but NOT twin turbo!
TomorrowzHero 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
camaro all the wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
misha44472 10 months ago
camaro all the wayyyyyyyyyyyyy
misha44472 10 months ago
dsm dont make tt's, WTF.
TALONE4G6 10 months ago
Since when they make twin turbo GSX's
dakill2 1 year ago
@dakill2
when people who work on cars modify theirs to be twin turbo.
anark07 11 months ago
not twin turbo... its nice.. but not a twin turbo.. my 16g talon pulls alot more.... i kicked a maro SS in the ass after giving him the launch last night hahaha... claimed to run 10s but i run 12 soooooo not bad for a $2000 ship...
PABLORL1989 1 year ago
1st off...GSX arent TT...therefore this is fake..^^
it would take extreme mod to the engine bay to make it a TT
2nd, yea obviously the Camaro won..ITS A REAL CAR BITCHES HAHA
if u have 4 cylinders, ur obviously missing the other 4.
yea im a V8 fan boy myself..y? cuz i had an 98 Eclipse GSX...
now i have an 02 Camaro SS id pick the Camaro over that weak ass shit any day
captgjohnson 1 year ago
i guess there's no replacement for displacement....except for FORCED INDUCTION.
Descente36 1 year ago 2
A twin turbo GSX?
Illeagle98 1 year ago 13
@Illeagle98
Haha. I was looking t the same thing. I only know of one in the DSM community.. and I believe he's making around 600hp and hits 10lbs around 2500rpm off the smaller turbine.
Evancarrick12 1 year ago
@Illeagle98
Haha. I was looking t the same thing. I only know of one in the DSM community.. and I believe he's making around 600hp and hits 10lbs around 2500rpm off the smaller turbine.
Evancarrick12 1 year ago
@Illeagle98 exactly, twin turbo would be stupid on this car?!?!?!
suprakilzz26 5 months ago
@Illeagle98 yah they are rare and only came out in japan, oh wait they were build in the u.s. lol
dalesocks 2 weeks ago
v8s can suck my nuts
dsmtony 1 year ago 5
@dsmtony ur mad casue you a int got a v8
studios567 1 year ago
@studios567 if i had a v8 everyone would be beating the crap out of me at the track lol......4g63 all way FTW!!!
dsmtony 9 months ago
@dsmtony lol silly ricer
mylilpony71 8 months ago
@mylilpony71 seriously? ricer??? lmao nice! is that the only word mustake owners know?
dsmtony 8 months ago
@dsmtony aww you mad that the poor little twin turbos couldn't handle the big bad v8? suck my american muscle having cock :p
FlawlessVizionz08 8 months ago
@FlawlessVizionz08 suck my american muscle having cock??? dosn't make sence but ok its understandable coming from a v8 idiot
dsmtony 8 months ago
@dsmtony
your girlfriend can suck my nuts too lol
EXiS091 7 months ago
@EXiS091 your mom just did lol
dsmtony 6 months ago
@dsmtony
my mom just did it ? why the fuck you pussy r dreaming ???? always bullshit !!!
you r a bitch u know why ? because u cant have a v8 car u pussy xD
so stfu and see how im fucking your gf
EXiS091 6 months ago
@EXiS091 why the fuck you pussy r dreaming???????????????????????????????????????? dosn't make sense hahahaha cant have a v8????? or dont want a v8?!! second one sounds more like it lol why want a v8 if i shit 70% of v8 in my town in my 4 banger.....you'll run out of gas before you catch up to me haha whats the MPG ON YOUR V8? 12?? LOL
dsmtony 5 months ago
@dsmtony
oh im sorry !!! i 4got ricers r poor
EXiS091 5 months ago
evos are the same shity durability like subarus and even worse if you put heavy power on them best engines over all are the v8s fuck what others say they need to grow up older to understand what im talking about .
IssaBendeck1 1 year ago
@IssaBendeck1 evos are not even close to shitty..maybe you just need to "grow up older" yourself to learn more about "cars"
CauseU 1 year ago 13
@IssaBendeck1 Wow man. v8 fan boy much?
JAoMC 1 year ago
there is no way that thing is running a twin or a compound turbo set-up. With my compound set-up I have a turbonetics t4 60-1 turbo and mhi e3b16g and i am making 675 hp and 592 lb/ft torque and am running high low 9 and if its a 1/4 mile from where they started to the light he ran it in 15 seconds thats a stock time whoever made this vid is a retard........ DSM rules muscle
rgsamson89 1 year ago
i don't think that eclipse was boosted i have ran them when my z28 was stock and they hang right in there till 40 or so before i really started to pull away... though i did have 273 rear gear at the time
JPARKERZ28 1 year ago
you all import haters. If you didn't know, Crysler was helping Mitsubishi build cars during 80s-90s. They even designed an engine for Mitsubishi. I drive 94 mitsu and it falls a part. Because i drive cryseler with mitsubishi logo on it.
aleksankazakov 1 year ago
DAMN THAT SS WAS DOING IT'S THING
DEADRIGHTZ 1 year ago
camaro ftw. and it wasnt even a ls1, it was lt1
fastgoat04 1 year ago
@fastgoat04 i know right he chocked the launch and still pulled... sad that the uploader can't tell its a z28 not an ss
JPARKERZ28 1 year ago
Listen I am not a a complete idiot when it comes to cars or modification but if I'm not mistaken there are more factors that go into a fast cars begin fast then just the size of the motor, with that being said the motor plays a very large roll in the definition of what is a fast car, also things to factor in are the power to weight ratio, gearing, torque, among with a few others. And when it comes to racing said cars, if you can't drive you 400-500 hp car then that power isn't really going to
thescionknight 1 year ago
v8, twice the motor, twice as slow.
comgeturs 1 year ago
Look I have an 82 camaro. and I will say an eclipse would kick its ass, especially from 60 mph and up. this race isn't really fair because its an LS1 chevy vs a four cylinder Eclipse. thats alot less smaller motor. Jap cars are way better for daily drivers and have tremendous power for just a 4 cylinder.. The 80's and 90's camaros with 4 cylinders and v6's aren't worth a shit, but the LS1 motor is fast, but its a V8
649alex 1 year ago
4 cylinders are like fat women " they are fun until you get caught with them".
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 Tell that to the new Subaru WRX STi. So much power for so little.
TheAstonMartian 1 year ago
@TheAstonMartian would you rather spend 40k on a little 4 cylinder turbo and get 300hp or would you rather spend 30-40k and get a v-8 (with twice the potential) with 400+hp?
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 Well, it does point me towards the engineering. Knowing that the STi can do so much with only 4 cylinders makes it that much more attractive. I am pretty sure that a V10 engine is even more powerful, and better than a V8 having more power, but for a four cylinder car, would yo not agree that at only 2.5L engine, the WRX STi is revolutionary in doing what most cars couldn't? I find it amazing since so much power comes from so little. The Mustang comparatively should be in supercar level.
TheAstonMartian 1 year ago
@TheAstonMartian you think you are so smart .v-8s, they are easy to build and maintain.if you spend the same $ on a 4 banger as you do a v-8 then the v-8 wins every time. 4 cylinder can never compete with a v-8 . 4 bangers are for kids.
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 I am not smart. If I had as much knowledge about you as cars on engine, and suspension, then I would be glad. However, I am not dumb enough to deny that 300 hp on a four cylinder version is a rarity, and does baffle me because of so much in so little. I like V8's, but I am not biased, or even stereotypical over cylinders. Subaru looks boy racerish, but they are fast, and did beat other cars on several factors. That's all.
TheAstonMartian 1 year ago
@TheAstonMartian im not stereotypical either. its no surprise that a 4banger gives you 300hp when a 8 banger gives you 600hp just as easy . where you can make a 4cylinder car 800hp , you can make a 8 cylinder 1600hp. even better why dont you try 8000hp 8 cylinders.. 4 cylinders cannot make nowhere near half of that without blowing up. does that baffle you any?
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 Thank you for understanding. A 4 banger giving 300 hp amazes me, because it takes less gas to give you that much power. A V8 is good, and all, but until recently, it was hard to buy a V8 which gave you that much power. The Mustang GT until 2010 only had 311 or so hp. Now, the Camaro SS, and Mustang GT have more power, but even then it does not come with 600 hp on stock versions. Getting more power from engine can be expensive too through mods, instead of stock.
TheAstonMartian 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 no. considering the v8's put on top fuel dragsters are running off of nitromethane not gasoline or even e85 and they need to be rebuilt after every pass. talk about blowing up. how about a 1600hp eclipse running 7's in a 1/4 mile... does that baffle you? lol. it does me.
mambacx 1 year ago
@mambacx 8000 HP running 4 second quarter miles. so when you grow up and become a man and get away from those kiddy cars then let me know.
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 more like 4.5. and 7 flat is in a car. not a dragster. you prolly have a mullet and think your 91 camaro is the shit huh?
mambacx 1 year ago
@mambacx u cant drive those kind of 7 second cars on the road . there are built up v8s that you can drive on the road that are 2000hp. do you ever watch any gt racing and see the v-8s fly by those little fag cars because they are slow. you need to move out of your grandmas basement and grow up.
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 never said it was road worthy only that it still had an origanal chassis from the firewall back. thats impressive. and i love american v8's as much as anyone else. however im not a narrow minded idiot who thinks there way is the highway. if you think you need 8 cylinders to be fast... then so be it. i'll just sit back and watch them go in a striaght line...
mambacx 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 Mullet man, your POS v8 is screaming for you to go fix it cause the damn thing breaks everyday. So grab a busch light, sit down, slice your wrists and watch nascar. People like you give domestic leg humpers a bad name. I own both a 78 el camino, a 86 regal t-type, and a 95 Eagle talon and must say out of all of them, I love the 4 cylinder for it's mod friendly engine. I love the V6 for its ability to make great power, and still get good gas mileage, love the elcamino for sound.
RichRusso4218 1 year ago
@RichRusso4218 if i was the type to watch nascar and to wear a mullet i would also drive a 78 el camino. 86 regal ? you got to be kidding me . maybe when you get a real v-8 a drive it you will then grow up and be a man..
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 Or maybe when you give "real" DSMs a drive you'll then see how addicting it is..like crack
CauseU 1 year ago
@CauseU you would know
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@mambacx Actually it is a 1200hp dsm running 7's and a 1600 hp one running 6's. Fastest 4 cylinder in the world. They keep restricting him in classes and he still sets world records.
RichRusso4218 1 year ago
@RichRusso4218 lol splitting hair a little bit.
mambacx 1 year ago
@TheAstonMartian A subaru is garbage, they make power but for only a few weeks before their motors have enough. I tune Subarus and Evo's and DSM's pretty much weekly and so far all the subaru's making 500hp have blown up in a few months after being tuned. Perfect A/R's, perfect mapping and they just can't handle it. Evo's are beast's on the other hand, they are tried and proven motors.
RichRusso4218 1 year ago
@RichRusso4218 Hmm. What do you do with all that power though. A Subaru makes 300 hp which is plenty fast for the engine, does good cornering, can seat five people, and is a rally car. I am not sure if a Mustang can do all that effectively. Sure you can make faster, but a skyline is also fast with 1000 hp. Also only so much time is spent actually racing. Mostly, day to day drive-ability comes into play.
TheAstonMartian 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 And your a retard too you spend 3-4k and get 300 hp learn what your talking about
rgsamson89 1 year ago
@rgsamson89 what are you talking about?
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 IDK where you buy your parts but with 2K I can pull out 300HP out of a DSM. 5K and you can get 500HP. That's buying shit brand new. Can get a DSM for about a grand for a decent one. So for 6K I will have a AWD 500HP, fuel efficient, light weight, V8 eater. Dumbass people who talk shit without knowing any knowledge of cars what so ever.
RichRusso4218 1 year ago
@RichRusso4218 when you get a job and you can afford to buy those things then let me know and i will out run you in a none modified v-8.
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@RichRusso4218 if you find a decent eclipse for a grand i'll give you a grand. most decent dsm's start around 3800 to 4k. you want a nice upgraded one its about 6-7k, you want a nice upgraded one that has low miles you wont find one for sale unless your in the "know"
Inuyashatg98 1 year ago
ya i have a 91 Eagle talon tsi. its running stock on 10lbs. but my friends brother built a 91 plymouth laser up to about 600 horse, running 28lbs on a t3t4 hybrid turbo, just wanna say, DSM's are fuckin sick, but they are peices of shit that break all the time. you want to build something, go with muscle. i have the talon and an 85 camaro with vids on here up and i love the camaro anyday. sounds better, looks better, and runs WAY better. just not as fast, but talon cheats by havin turbo.
Lmaoman12 1 year ago
No such thing as a TT GSX ask any real DSMer best you can do is a compound turbo setup
Irv0613 1 year ago
anything you do to a 4 cylinder car is not worth the time or money
Lestkn2 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 shut tha fff up dam that was lame, ohh look at me im so random lol.
Blazen8gsx 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 ignorance isn't an excuse for ragging on 4 cylinders? my buddies rsx will beat most v-8's on the street running over 800ho to the wheels not bad for a 4 banger. let me guess you call BS i no. just look it up on youtube nrg turbo rsx by yankee81116
fubu30086 1 year ago
@Lestkn2 Tell that to me and 3 of my friends who have dsms all pumping over 300hp on a nice little 4cyl. One bud of mine got 430hp on his 93 Talon.
JAoMC 1 year ago
@JAoMC 4 cylinders are not good to make go that fast. they are not going to last.i have a stock camaro that is 300hp and another stock camaro that is 430hp with no mods so what does that tell you.
Lestkn2 1 year ago
lol wake up the race has started
nismohead100 1 year ago
ive seen at the 2009 dsm shoot out at buschur a compound turbod eclipse. a tt setup that the supras use were a smaller turbo spools up a bigger turbo. it peaks at 40psi and is no joke look it up on here i found it under "compound turbo dsm" so you can do it!
sk8rj514 1 year ago
Lmfao this aint porsche, its not a TT 4g63.Its a single turbo obviously.
garrett6699 1 year ago
HAHAHAH WAS THE CAMARO RACING ON THE TURNING LANE
MIDWAYMARTH 1 year ago
....slow
3rni3PL 1 year ago
That shit is NOT twin turbo, the guy on Dsmtuners is the ONLY person to have done it successfully so far. Video is a joke.
kjecrew 1 year ago
hard to tell if its twin turbo or not. i personally know a guy with a twin turbo eclipse, although his kicks ass, and this one doesnt. he spools about 40 psi by 4400 rpms. its a red 99 gsx with white tears/stripes down the side. his name on the dsmtuner forums is 99gst_racer if you care to find him and discuss it.
darigaaz06 1 year ago
an eclipse wont be able to be twin turbo its just a 4 cylinder and there is not enough space
hector1130 1 year ago
dude in the camaro is a moron, he almost hit the semi head on and cut the eclipse off to get into his lane from getting hit. He should of slow down and got behind the eclipse instead of dodging the car hes racing and the semi truck. Whata way to kill yourself buddy , nice!
1998gst4611 1 year ago
lol even with the horrible start it caught up to the "twin turbo" eclipse.
DSMking90 1 year ago
Not a TT GSX for sure but it was still modded and still got caught by an LT1 Z28.
TrowVr01 1 year ago
Thats not even a SS Camaro. Thats a Z28.
73camarokid 1 year ago
again eclipse CANT BE TT ever no 4 cylinders can
95525v 1 year ago
@95525v actually yes they can with the proper setup.
bigpeteswackshack 1 year ago
fake and gay
not twin turbo unless you mde it sequential but even then you would be wasting your time
and if that was a gsx even it would have still been going especialy in 3rd gear
and he clearly wasnt getting on it
and that camaro sounded like an auto wich means its gear ratios are doo-doo for stock ratios
and gtps wont beat a gst with 10psi boost and fmi already tested it
Debajabe420666 1 year ago
Cant be TT, eclipse's only have one manifold which means only 1 turbo
XxHaWkRiDeRsxX 1 year ago
my raptor woulda beat both of them pieces of shit...and whats with these noobs that claim they have a TT eclipse, how stupid do u think people are
mylaser91 1 year ago
yeap thats a Z28
Luisitopadron 1 year ago
To avoid the AWD problem get them on a roll. Got a lightly modded GTP and it destroys them on a roll. Still take them off the line but takes around 60-70 before I start pulling past.
ldxml 1 year ago
gtp is fwd, and they suck ass
lukaskrew 1 year ago
@lukaskrew who cares if they are front wheel, they still take out eclipses and camaros, which is funny considering they are not sports cars
ldxml 1 year ago
@ldxml which is even funnier becuase your slow as balls shitty pontiac couldnt beat my winter beater 4 banger.... hahaha
TheLeeno 1 year ago
@ldxml I highly doubt that your pontiac shit box beats any half way modded dsm, sorry dude.... FAIL
TheLeeno 1 year ago
@TheLeeno CAI,PCM,3"downpipe,3.4"pulleys...easily take GSX's. Only $1,000 in mods on a large coupe and it's amazing what it can do. "Shit box?" GSX's and T's constantly break down, I guarantee a hell of lot more miles out of my car.
ldxml 1 year ago
my rwd pontiac eats most dsm's, and for the ones the v6 cant beat the v8 comes out and beats. sad thing is both of them are almost bone stock
BlackBirdv6 1 year ago
@BlackBirdv6 most dsm's? you mean the non turbo or the stock ones, what does a gtp do in the 1/4, like 16??? rofl seriously 200 hp omg a DSM has that stock and its alot lighter face it, your either dreaming or lying...
TheLeeno 1 year ago
for 1 im not talking about a gtp. for 2 my little v6 does fine against TURBO dsm's, 3 last time i weighed my car it was 3100 with a full tank, my little honda is 2900 with a full tank, and i doubt a full weight fwd dsm is much lighter, and yeah its got 10 more hp than mine but mine has 11 more torque and i dont have turbo lag. and sorry buddy, but my poor little v8 only has about 150 more hp and gobs more torque and might weigh 3-400 pounds more. and personally in the v6 ive beat modded gst's.
BlackBirdv6 1 year ago
@TheLeeno A gtp will usually do 14.9-15.0 bone stock with an average joe driving. They have 240hp 280ft lbs stock, ive seen them go as low as 14.50 stock (a 1998 daytona edition did this). Stock vs stock gsx and gtp is a very good match but a gtp might edge out a gsx at the line. For modding, gtp's can be made fast just as easily as dsm's. High 12s for about $1500 (if you do the work yourself) in a full weight 3500lb fwd automatic car, pretty impressive.
circlelt1 1 year ago
@circlelt1 um ya i read 200 hp 220 trq, so not sure where your getting your #'s, but the 15second ish, to mid 15's is about right, I dont know about 14.5 "STOCK", but I'll give it to you. GSX's are known to run low 14's "STOCK" put $200 in it and you can hit 13's, unfortunatley the GTP is a SHITbox as far as performance goes, the mistu 4g63 is WAY better of a platform, and it's a 2.0 four banger. Can you even get a gtp stick? GAY.
TheLeeno 1 year ago
@TheLeeno The 200hp gtp's are the 3.4 DOHC gtp's, which got replaced by the 3800s/c in 1997. Everyone knows they are 240hp for the series 2 3800s/c. The series 1 has 205hp but those never went in gtp's, the ssei's and regals got those pre-97. The video of the stock 14.5 is on streetfire and might be on here too. The gtp is a great platform, and although they dont come with a stick, They wouldnt be any faster with a stick, its one of the few cars that are actually quicker with an auto.
circlelt1 1 year ago
@TheLeeno And in anycase ive heard of chimps getting faster than mid 15s in gtp's :P Another thing to consider if you see one running mid 15 is that they are the type of car that dont commonly get taken care of except by the occassional enthusiast.
circlelt1 1 year ago
There is no such thing as a TT eclipse....
blueoctaneevoX 1 year ago
Looks like the Camaro won, and the GSX definitely had the start because of AWD
candle2k 1 year ago 2
Stop talking shit. There is a twin turbo eclipse out there. And his torque curve is monstrous. So i would just shut the fuck up. You sound stupid when you dont know what your talking about. Is this one a TT- no. The only TT eclipse was finished only a few months ago.
mytbouf21 1 year ago
@mytbouf21 You're wrong. Many years ago a guy did twin turbo a 4G63 Eclipse.
4G63PWR 1 year ago
@mytbouf21 wheres the link for that? I'd like to know where they stuck the second turbo in an engine bay that size.
eGnasty 1 year ago
yay!!!!lets race head on into a semi!!! woo, dumbasses
deathkricket123 1 year ago
no one puts 2 turbos on a 4 banger fuck my car when it was on a single tdo6h was faster than that.
camaroSYChevelle 1 year ago
both cars were slow and ur full of shit that car is not a TT.. ur a fucking idiot! hahhahahahahahaha!!!!
flowback101 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
+
OMG, i love the twilight movies!
I actually just watched TWILIGHT NEW MOON online in DVD quality...FREE!
Check it out here:
cctv,ws/7/newmoon
(Just put a dot where the comma is. Enjoy!)
+
Wendy9796 1 year ago
don`t matter if the camaro had a bad start as you don`t get a restart at the track where they should be ! twin turbo or not ; he beat the camaro !
crownv80 1 year ago
@crownv80 actually if you looks really hard the eclipse still lost the camaro caught him. That just shows how bad ass that camaro really is. Plua that is a GSX eclipse with AWD so if should be a big V8 RWD off the line don't ya think?
getalife04 1 year ago
LOL.
ConstrictedTruth 1 year ago
camaro bad start
ABINSK 1 year ago 2
Not a TT GSX thats for sure. I have worked on plenty of eclipses and there just isn't enough room to do twin turbo. You can gain just as much power with going with a big single turbo and it's a hell of alot less of a hassle.
getalife04 1 year ago 18
getalife04 is right. There's no way you could fit a TT in an Eclipse.
DudewithdaShades 1 year ago
I agree with getalife04 as well, no point in installing a TT system when one can do the job. both drivers sucked balls, the GSX would have killed it anyway.. power over weight ratio..
flowback101 1 year ago
@getalife04 well if your gonna be doing street racing like that you want a smaller turbo not a big one.
bigpeteswackshack 1 year ago
@bigpeteswackshack Just depends on your preference really, small turbos spool quick BUT at the top end it doesn't have shit. For me on a WRX like I drive the best street turbo is like a VF39 or a VF22 and even a 16G or 18G turbo it's too bad either. The 18G is really the biggest you should go if it's a street car otherwise your lag will suck ass if you go bigger lol.
getalife04 1 year ago
@getalife04 true. now heres somebody who actually knows something about cars. small (not to small though) turbos for low end torque for most street applications with no more than . but yes if your gonna run track racing you want between 16 and 18g for a higher pull and mid to high end torque
bigpeteswackshack 1 year ago
@bigpeteswackshack Yeah for wrx's the best over all street turbo is the VF39 or the VF22 hands down. Now the VF22 takes longer to spool but still spins up by 3200rpm but the VF39 (STi Turbo) spools up under 3,000 rpms and actually hold strong until 6000 rpms then it drops pretty quick for the final 7000 rpm redline. I build up these cars all the time and thats what I always recommend for everyone. Never seems to fail me lol.
getalife04 1 year ago
@getalife04 now im a professional mechanic and i just learned something from you. its always good to commerce with other men of the trade. or woman whatever you may be. lol. ill keep that in mind cause im going back to school cause i have to renew every two years. but im going back to do import racing.
bigpeteswackshack 1 year ago
@bigpeteswackshack LOL we all learn something from time to time. One thing I have learned in messing with cars is that you NEVER know everything lol. And yeah I am all man :D. And one thing I forgot was the VF22 is a great topend turbo they hold boost very nicely in the upper range hence the slower spool up. Really it all depends on the size/flow of the motor. More mods like heads and cams and stuff you can run a bigger turbo on the street. It really just depends on what you got. As you know lol
getalife04 1 year ago
@getalife04 oh yeah. my auto teacher made sure we all knew that. it was great talking to you.
bigpeteswackshack 1 year ago
oh yes you can. they swap 3000gt vr-4 engine. but its a lot of work
yanogly123 1 year ago
@yanogly123 lol a lot of work is an understatement lol. I know some people that have done it and they wouldn't do it again if somebody paid them lol.
getalife04 1 year ago
@getalife04 the only way u can put twin turbos in it is to replace the engine with 3000gt vr 4's engine , Its possible and i know people who did that ,
akifmafia 1 year ago
@akifmafia Yeah true I have seen it as well but really the 4G63 motor is great so why go through all that hassle? The vr4 engine is good but hell I'd just buy a VR4 and save myself the hassle lol. They aren't much heavier and have better differentials. Although the transfer case in both of them sucks.
getalife04 1 year ago
@getalife04 VR4 twin turbo engines bolt into eclipses are are V6's. 6a12tt for the gsx/gst is bolt in. 6a13tt for the rs/gs is bolt in. So twin turbo can work in eclipses.
getdrunk1990 1 year ago
@getdrunk1990 yeah it's not insanely difficult to do it but the way I see it why bother doing that at all? The 4G63 motor is one of the best 4 cylinders ever made. So I see no point in changing that lol.
getalife04 1 year ago
@getalife04 Theres a point in doing if you have a 420a eclipse.
getdrunk1990 1 year ago
@getalife04 a compound turbo setup I believe is the only 'twin' setup that has been done on these cars. it's possible but definitely a true TT setup is just not worth the time/bother to fit in there as you said.
Bbdrew 1 year ago
@getalife04 yeah but theres lag as well with one big turbo vs 2 smaller turbos in a parallel twin turbo configuration
mustang517 1 year ago