I've written a paper that tells you all you need to know to solve this and in a way it's confirmation of my theories. That time difference will translate to angles and finally distance to your event. It's basically the so called red shift at higher frequencies.
I know why this happened. Basically the two photons did not travel the same path to the observer. The shorter wave length was refracted more by the dark matter that surrounds the galaxy where this explosion occurred. The longer wave length did not get as refracted as much by the dark matter so it's path was more direct. If you want I can explain it to you but it will take more than the 500 characters I'm allowed here.
so wait is that why color happens higher frequency photons vibrate at different colors. and like sound ringing in a room is why when light dims it doesnt change color?
@Zanzabarism if that is true i should be able to affect the pattern of light frequencies with other wave forms right?....crystal does this...so do crystals change the "frequencies" of light when they refract a group of photons. which is how we get the colors that we do.
@Zanzabarism but that would all support string theory........it would explain the hutchinson affect wouldnt it? three tesla coils and overlapping fields affecting the way matter behaves because all of matter is just basically a frequency of energy?
What's amusing is that "little brains" with just a book and internet, can contradict Big brains from Goddard, or Jpl space centre with an armada of super hight technology telescopes, massive computers and half a life of study....
just be respectful enough to thanks them they "dilute" the explanations to something easy that we can understand
@timster112 Yeah, if it was that simple. But the speed limit of masses are dependent of the rest mass, not the inertial mass. Photons have (before we disprove it :P) as rest mass of zero, it's "true" mass.
If you wish to see GOD particle, Higgs Boson see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA.FIT-lFuture Imaging tool or Certainty tool technology developed which is GOD Particle in Human body.Based on data in biometric or biosensor of hands where FITtechnology has blue prints of future diasters like earthquake,nuclear radiation,tsunami,Dam burst ,Hurricane, KATRINA , 9/11 2001 WTC Tragedy, 26/11 2008 mumbai serial blast.scientist welcome to see and test FIT
The reason why quantum mechanics and relativity are not unified is because Chuck Norris travelled back in time to the Big Bang and roundhouse-kicked the Theory of Everything in the face.
How can you apply a theory of gravity to the particles that actually cause the process of gravity? I think science needs to figure out what causes mass before it starts making up shit about what gravity is!
To comprehend what "gravity is" requires a comprehension of what causes "mass"; to understand that you need a better paradigm for motion. You'll also need to be a bit more skeptical of the physics you THINK you know. Our equations tell us how gravity works with objects that have the property of mass; they do not tell us the cause of mass or gravity. Mass and energy are both measured properties of matter; they are not autonomous entities!
@MsWanderer1 which is why science isn't perfect. Scientists are constantly at the drawing board trying to solve some of the largest questions known to man.
And just to illustrate how science is constantly changing, your grandparents probably believed in what goes up, must come down. However, if I were to throw an apple upward at 11.2km/s or more, and if it didn't collide with any other body it would continue and never come down, (unless you invoke some symmetrical theories, but that's when physics all goes to hell.)
The solution of uniting those theories... Is right in front of you guys! Hint: Look at atom, on how an electron orbits the nucleus, and then look at how two black holes orbit each other! See any difference? Did you get the idea?
@danielbluesmoke Two black holes eventually come together, forming a super black hole. The electron just keeps going around and around the nucleus much faster than the black hole orbits eachother. Funny thing is that if the electrons orbit too fast, it will fly away from the nucleus, eventually just bouncing around, but still has some force pulling towards the nucleus. But if same is with black holes that eventually fly away from eachother if fast, they can eventually leave eachother's gravity.
@warriorofguitar Two black holes orbiting each other, resembles the same pattern as electrons orbiting the nucleus. Keep in mind that those black holes reach the speed of light just before merging, and they generate gravity waves. Now in case of atoms, the situation might be very different, but check out the "Schwarzschild proton" theory. This could throw out the window the standard model, since it assumes that in the center of each proton/neutron is a black hole.
nasa's fermi mission is but A mouse-ion for raising founds. non of what nasa does is truely physics it is merely description of how humanity should fight to prevail regardless of how eminent is their collective death. GRAVE E.T. the smoking ass from behind the universe's bottom it's all a mirage E to the WC^2. bullshit rampancy.
Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on just two postulates,
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
The idea is that at subatomic levels, space time is not smooth and continuous.. And so, a high energy, high frequency photon with very short wavelengths, traveling in this warped and jagged space time fabric would experience resistance due to interference by the space time fabric.. However a low frequency low energy photon has wavelengths far higher than the fine roughness of the space-time fabric, and thus experience no resistance when traveling through space-time..
It is known that space can bend light, and by passing it through large distances in space, we can study how the fabric of space time affect the behavior of light across different frequencies of the EM spectrum.. And since the EM spectrum consists of a large variety of wavelength, from gamma rays of wavelengths less than the diameter of an electron to radio waves with wavelength longer than that of a football field, it is the perfect candidate for the test..
Einstein's relativity suggests that the space time fabric is smooth and continuous.. While quantum physics says that no.. At subatomic levels, the space time fabric is not smooth.. In fact it's very rough, violent and unpredictable.. What we are trying to figure is if space time fabric is really sandpaper, or smooth rubber..
i think there is a flaw in these concepts. particles do not exist until the wave energy they comprise is collapsed at a confined location, i.e. until someone observes them. before that they are standing wave without any location. it may well be that the speed of light is just an effect that depends on a finite speed of physical observation. the speed of observation has never been considered, but i guess it also conforms to an uncertainty principle. thus the speed of light is not exactly constant
@badsalad313 No, I was saying it doesn't work. Your referring to "The Law" a boundary set by mankind using their free will. I was talking about this "gods" gift of free will to man...
@daelohmen No...The speed of light is much faster than the nerve impulses traveling from your eyes to you brain.
Basically you never see anything exactly as it currently exists, you see it as it was as the light bounced off of it, before it traveled to your eyes and was compiled into a coherent image by your brain.
@daelohmen theres no speed of sight, light become in contact with something and that light go to your eyes, your eyes capture that, and your brain process it, that is sight
"In the physical sciences, a particle is a small localized object to which can be ascribed several physical properties such as volume or mass. The word is rather general in meaning, and is refined as needed by various scientific fields."
So physics would just refine photon as "massless particle which ...."
Well, to all the religious folks here: If you already have the answers in your Bible, why bother watching this video? In fact, why would you need to spread the word of God? Everyone already knows where it can be found -- in your moldy, old book.
You know one thing I didn't understand about science is when somebody says, "It was too miniscule to affect it." Just by being miniscule doesn't it affect it? Maybe not as much as something smaller, but isn't it still affected and altered by it?
Linen products are easy to store, they can withstand temperature differentials and the toughest washings, which make them even softer, whiter, and more clinging to the body. You can find best linen fabric store on my profile, or just visit:
linen-fabric. net
All over the world people want to use only natural and environmentally friendly materials like linen and cotton!
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Join the revolution!
Astonishing that on the other side of humanity we have all this knowledge and science and amazing development. And on the other side we have religion.
Useless superstition still holds billions in its grasp. Its embarassing and ridiculous.
Religious nuts hate science. And trhat's not too strange..science is doing a pretty good job of a#¤-f¤#king the religions, more and more every day of course. I think that even many christtards/jewtards or muslimtards really know that religion/superstition is losing, hehe.: )
Relativity is nothing more than a mathematical methodology to correct for variances due to motion and the limits of data collection to the speed of light. There are NO ABSOLUTE REFERENCES. Quantum Mechanics is also basically only a mathematical methodology. Realize a proper paradigm of reality and there will be no conflict between the two.
BTW: spacetime is just another name for aether and light is a wave in that spacetime aether medium; NOT a particle. Also; string theory is BS!
I've always wondered how someone barely out of his teenage years can acquire greater knowledge and experience than someone who has spent almost 50 years in several science fields; did you learn all that while still sucking your mother's tit or did it come to you through osmosis? You arrogant stupid children are quite annoying when you demonstrate your ignorance online!
You need to stop watching the Discovery Channel and thinking it give you a PhD in physics!
@MsWanderer1 hahahahahahahahahahaha thank you any way for your tact (i have read more than 20 books about this area of science )
all the scientists that have changed the humanity life and have proposed all the dominant theories , all of them was a young men not an old people like you
and i conclude that you have no imagination
someday you will wake up , then you will realize that you've wasted your time for nothing except depreciating the others .
Holy shit; you are so ignorant. The greatest advances in science came from old folk like me. You don't even seem to have a high school physics education!
Subscribe to the trade journals; 20 "Cat In The Hat" science books only teach what sells to you general public geniuses. Unfortunately some good scientists have to publish crap like that to simply earn a living; their academic jobs don't pay shit!
Now; why don't you tell us more of your scientific enlightenment? :-))
Do you think it's possible to build a thought barrier? What would you build it out of?
Space-time and thought are both abstracts and have no physical properties; the only difference is that space-time is a mathematical abstract used to correct for our observational variances and measurement limitations.
I would suggest you join a science or physics blog web-site; your questions require a great deal more study on your part. Review the Stanford YouTube account for some excellent video lectures on Relativity and many other topics.
LOL; Actually NO it does not; MASS bends "space-time" as defended by Einstein's GR and space-time is a mathematical abstract. In Einstein's Relativity, space-time is just another word for ether! You are making the assumption that the cause of mass is known; the Higggs Boson is one theory that has not been proven yet; read up on your Feynman. If space can be bent then it is a physical entity; what is it? Do as I suggested; then ask the right questions.
I believe this video stated that Relativity is a methodology to allow different reference frames to measure the same events and acquire the same data. Space-time is one of the abstracts of the equations that make this possible. Don’t allow simple physics to be turned into a complex quagmire of BS explanations of mathematical terms.
"What is gravity"? Do you want the textbook answer or would you like a more accurate description other than "a force property of mass"?
@MsWanderer1 Well that depends. Does a Techion exist in all levels or only the one you thing it does. What is the spark of conciousness? Here is a chaotic theory what if the reason the this teenager has greater knowledge is because he is you in an alternate existance. perharps he has studied this before and now in this time he can use it. perhaps all is random and nothing has sense even if a 1 plus 1 is 2. What if its 1 plus 1 is 11 or even 20000000000!
science was created to understand how god worked. In fact the idea came in a dream were an angel dictated the basis for science. And just because some assholes hijacked the idea of a god doesnt make it any less likely. God is a word and you can associate many things to it. Could just be another word for "everything". but why get out of bed? well, its all about the experience so why not? so much anger on both sides shows both are blind..
see, that is the problem with scientist. they overthink things. oh one photon arrives before another. that would be the clear answer. but noooo, they have to overthink it and say well maybe not, maybe some little fabricky stuff changes it
so this means that our thoughts and feelings are being caught by light particle/waves through the rotating axes of spacetime? and that when we die we will travel the light beams to the most amazing flights of fancy?
Maybe the two photons move together in unison in some sort of parter like a couple of dancer dancing in unison. Causing them arrive in the exact same time.
Why get out of bed? Only god can think, so why act at all? Why waste your time with life at all; why not just end it now so you can go visit your friend in the sky? After all, the whole purpose of this life is to be a test for the next; right?
What a pile-o-$%&#. Try some logic yourself for once, rather than blindly trudging through your short life with mysticism; you might be surprised.
@TheDrunkard1 Why bother you say? Why do anything and just let god handle things, you ask? There's nothing logical about god, so I don't think I'll do that. If you think people of science believe we're alive as a test run for the next life, study your textbooks a bit more. We don't KNOW what comes after this dimension we're in, could be oblivion, could be a raise in consciousness. Either or, it has nothing to do with organized religion and if you think so, you're missing so much!
@Ptinski I was being sarcastic to the theist. I was taking an over-the-top look at where belief in an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent overlord would logically leave one. I can't believe you didn't catch that...hehe.
@TheDrunkard1 i understand what you mean however do you not fall also in his or her level. You fallow logic that seems to work for you, but if i may add some chaos into it. If the number twelve is drawn with a rainbowed patten is it a color or a number. That depends on what your looking at the color or the number. so you see the number but he or she sees the colors. Combine the two and you get actual picture. The question is was there a number with color to begin with?
I believe in subjective perception, yes. The problem begins when we state our perceptions as completely objective, especially when those perceptions are not based on evidence. There must be a common experience in which we can all share, else even language falls apart. The only common experience is what we call reality, that conglomeration of objects as they actually are (not as they may appear or how we want them to be). Unobservable objects are beyond our scope.
@TheDrunkard1 do you need evidence to know that you breath and live? just because you cant see it those not rule out the fact that it does existce. like the wind you breath it yet you can't see it yet it has the power to uproot the very earth. open your mind stop being afraid and rigid flow like water. or is it because your emotions are so irradic or so dim that life is just a series of numbers and events with no meaning? im only asking to shift our perspetive add to your knowledge and grow.
I believe I'm doing just that. I was extremely religious for nearly all-my-life but I've managed a complete shift in my thinking. It was difficult to say the least. Such a transition requires openness and a love for truth. I've come to realize that not all others share my love for truth, seeking to fulfill other needs first. This may not be a bad thing in some instances (love, etc) but stagnates one in other instances. Truth is a requirement to understanding, don't you think? :)
@TheDrunkard1 yes and no it depends on what your trying to understand. but alas we can only continue t explorer just don't get to caught up in the detail that you miss te bigger picture peace
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "the bigger picture." We only have our immediate, "pseudo-section" of the universe to understand and explore. Anything "bigger" is beyond our scope, therefore speculative or even imaginary. I understand that there is still much beyond our silly-little bit of understanding but make-believe in regards to its nature should not compete with actual science. We need a common foundation upon which to build and communicate logic.
or some of us look at the real world around us as a how and not a why. the scientific process is fundementally flawed in telling anything about the metaphysical. thats why its called physics, and not metaphysics. i dont really believe in the stories of the bible myself, but it says nothing about before light but that god existed. i bet big bang theorists felt a little something after ironically showing how much sense it makes verbatim and even showing why light came before day or the sun.
but the worst part of your argument is that there are two paths, athiests and believing, either god or some direct contact in his stead appears for all to see and the believers are triumphant, or athiests complain about a paradoxed question until the Great Freeze. you can liken religion to imaginary or apparitions,but youll never prove it. and until something miraculous comes,believers cant prove your wrong since they only have scripture to reference.
i think the point is that the speed of light is a misnomer. if youve ever taken calculus and know about limits youd understand. anything can come extremely close the speed of light, including photons. its just that photons may be infinity close to the C, but in true velocity is can only be described at "speed of light<C" and not "speed of light <= C", or as velocity approaches C; Df(v)= infinity. C should be a constant in its own right and not reserved to photons in a vacuum.
You mean like the invention of antibiotics and vaccinations didn't do anything? Or do you mean like electricity and IT? What about the printing press or transportation - those are surely examples of something that isn't doing anything - right?
Science has done more to help humanity than your "God" ever will.
sigh...whats with people and not looking at science as how and religion as why? either a miracle will happen and believers will be vindicated, or athiests can wait until the last proton decays in quiet desperation. is it so weird someone who believes firmly in god sees the innovation of man in medicine and other great technologies? how bout we keep physics and metaphysics separate?
@beechgroveHO - you're a moron. Trying to be smart. You're arguments have no substance. Just like religion. No substance. Science? Puts the fancy nike shoes on your feet bitch
How do you know the large and small light waves left at the same time? usually in an explosion, there could be more then 1 ignition point, a secondary explosion or even a dual sided explosion (coming from 2 ends at different distances form you satellite Ermes) for an accurate test or theory on this, you would have to control the explosion
Aha, yes how many people have killed themselves because of some illiterate fool spouting a great wisdom about great changes that only they know about.
The world changes every second of every day, there's no great wisdoms behind it, it just happens.
If anyone tells you that they have an answer to the changes or the reasons why things are changing beyond what we actually know is a liar simple as that.
Why is it ignorant to think there is no god? All our precessors who believed in the other 1000ths of gods have been WRONG.
Thor, Loki, Odin, Zeus, Apollo, Ra, Venus, Poseidon, you name it, all utter nonsense. The chance Christians or any other religion has got it right is statistically less than 0.1%.
It's kinda pathetic really that theists never learn. They all think they got it right, that they have the right god this time... just like those Zeus believers before them.
@Phyrexious Exactly thats why they're all gone because of their ignorance even the Aztecs went down from all of their gods to a single one , the one above all the alpha and the omega, just look it up" fractals" ," the golden mean" its no coincidence god is everywhere man.
@Phyrexious For your information there are scientists who believe in God. The complexity of macrocosmos, microcosmos and life points to a Creator - God. Did you not know that God is the ultimate Scientist...Science only re-affirms what God had already done.
Throughout history the made up gods have lost their power whenever mankind discovered the real physics behind it. Arora Borealis, lightning, the sun, you name it and a god was responsible before we could rid ourselves from the ignorance on the subject. Appearantly you're still stuck believing a magical being is the answer to it all, yet it tells you *nothing*. All you've done is replace X with Y and fool yourself into thinking you've got the answer.
DLando, you didn't provide any arguments for your statements. All life points to a creator? Maybe if you ignore the facts that tell you otherwise...
How would you explain the fact that we have a direct FUSION of 2 chimp genes in our genetic code. (We have 1 chromosome pair less and the fused one is rare and matches perfectly). Did your precious god use chimp DNA to make humans? If not, you have no answer yet evolution has a perfectly valid one.
And that's just one of MANY examples where a creator makes no sense whatsoever whereas evolution predicted the outcome before it was even discovered.
If you're done answering my DNA question maybe you could enlighten us on the following examples:
Why do fish on the bottom of the ocean have blind eyes? Evolution predicts that as they go deeper with less sunlight they eventually lose their sight because it's not needed anymore. Did your god just gave them blind eyes for fun 'n giggles?
And last but not least, why do dandelions have the yellow flower when they reproduce Asexually. Meaning they don't need pollination anymore and thus the yellow flower is obselete.
Did you god once again just had a brain fart and gave them flowers for being pretty?
The evolutionary story actually makes sence and is backed up by the evidence that dandelions used to reproduce with the help of pollination but gradually changed over time to reproduce asexually and still have a vestigial flower.
@Phyrexious Why do you even think the way you do? Because God gave you a mind to reason. I don't have to go into quantum physics, complex mathematics, particles of the microcosmos, the behavior of macrocosmos, the components of DNA, and the enormous probability of life occurring by itself without a Creator. The bottom line is I have hope and you don't. You can continue to deny God if you want but if you are curious about the difference between man's science and God's Science hint:God's enormous
@Phyrexious And you have just lost your chance in entering the Kingdom of God, a spiritual realm outside of space and time and the physical universe. Your life will end without ever knowing the mind of God. Stuck in man's science which is far below God's Science.
Yeah keep wishing for another life while wasting your time in the only one life you know for sure is real. All time time praying to someone who's not there, just like all the Muslims and Hindu's in the world think THEIR god is real, and how believers in Zeus, Ra, Vishnu, Odin and thousands of others prayed to their non-existent god. So sad.
You are SO sure you found the real god this time, JUST LIKE all the other theists throughout history whose gods we now both agree are BS.
@Phyrexious Your right about the other gods, The true God exposed them as false. No I'm not wasting my time and life. I'm living my life and I have confidence in God who will resurrect and extend the lives of those who believe and accept God. Man has only seen a small part of God's creation. God set the parameters of what man can observe and discover, man cannot go beyond that unless you accept God. You can't go outside of space and time, the physical universe into the spiritual on your own.
I've written a paper that tells you all you need to know to solve this and in a way it's confirmation of my theories. That time difference will translate to angles and finally distance to your event. It's basically the so called red shift at higher frequencies.
DiogenesofCalgary 3 weeks ago
I know why this happened. Basically the two photons did not travel the same path to the observer. The shorter wave length was refracted more by the dark matter that surrounds the galaxy where this explosion occurred. The longer wave length did not get as refracted as much by the dark matter so it's path was more direct. If you want I can explain it to you but it will take more than the 500 characters I'm allowed here.
DiogenesofCalgary 3 weeks ago
so wait is that why color happens higher frequency photons vibrate at different colors. and like sound ringing in a room is why when light dims it doesnt change color?
Zanzabarism 2 months ago
@Zanzabarism if that is true i should be able to affect the pattern of light frequencies with other wave forms right?....crystal does this...so do crystals change the "frequencies" of light when they refract a group of photons. which is how we get the colors that we do.
Zanzabarism 2 months ago
@Zanzabarism but that would all support string theory........it would explain the hutchinson affect wouldnt it? three tesla coils and overlapping fields affecting the way matter behaves because all of matter is just basically a frequency of energy?
Zanzabarism 2 months ago
Too bad they don't know shit about Walter Russell therefore they're years away from theory of everything - fuckin n00bs , learn who Tesla was - peace
dankcro 3 months ago
WWET...what would Einstein think?
AttackArtists 4 months ago
@AttackArtists Why Einstein never defined time?!!!!
demarmat 3 months ago
i would wanna see a race between neutrino fired from the LHC and a foton fired in the LHC
ill bet the foton wins then and also moves faster then its ordinaire speed..
they need to test.
can the LHC also shoot fotons threw the collider?
i dunno
ImmortalUniverse 5 months ago
@ImmortalUniverse
Dunno, write to them, but first remember to spell photon properly
Danisfail 3 months ago
@Danisfail Well thats the problem with English and me speaking another language.
I wrote Photon in my own language, guess i forgot the English word.
thnx anyways.
ImmortalUniverse 3 months ago
@ImmortalUniverse
Oh, well fair enough
Danisfail 2 months ago
fotons and electro magnetism and gravity are waves aswell .
waves of bigger particles.
that are traveling accros a lane of smaller micro waves .
thats why i think our space and time can stretch and create holes.
because there is another background .
but thats my stupid theory,
that space and time can speedup particles within another space and time .
thats why i think neutrino arived faster then lightspeed in the LHC from Cern
ImmortalUniverse 5 months ago
i think gamma rays are the structure of the Universe .
gamma rays from quasars might even feed electro magnetism and gravity.
the earth gets hit by gamma rays every day from the sun .
but also from quasars created billions of years ago , close to the beginning of our space and time.
before that the universe probably was a big space and time full of micro waves.
but maybe with multiple big bangs, that maybe even overlap each other .
and therefor we dont understand all energy.
ImmortalUniverse 5 months ago
@ImmortalUniverse Did you said " I think"? Very good joke!
demarmat 3 months ago
@demarmat
yeah im hilarious.
you should hear the joke i made about your momma.
but then again , it was more sad.
ImmortalUniverse 3 months ago
What's amusing is that "little brains" with just a book and internet, can contradict Big brains from Goddard, or Jpl space centre with an armada of super hight technology telescopes, massive computers and half a life of study....
just be respectful enough to thanks them they "dilute" the explanations to something easy that we can understand
MrLewooz 5 months ago
@MrLewooz - nice blurb and very true...lol
CYRAPHYM 5 months ago
that woman needs 2 slow down, seriously she talking at the god dam speed of light
hasnaen 5 months ago
@hasnaen maybe your ears need to work faster ;)
TheWeepingCorpse 5 months ago
@hasnaen - it seems you are able to listen and hear however, her Irish accent is really what you are having difficulty with. IMO
CYRAPHYM 5 months ago
It would make sense.. more energy is more 'mass'? ergo less speed
timster112 5 months ago
@timster112 Yeah, if it was that simple. But the speed limit of masses are dependent of the rest mass, not the inertial mass. Photons have (before we disprove it :P) as rest mass of zero, it's "true" mass.
murdakah 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you wish to see GOD particle, Higgs Boson see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA.FIT-lFuture Imaging tool or Certainty tool technology developed which is GOD Particle in Human body.Based on data in biometric or biosensor of hands where FITtechnology has blue prints of future diasters like earthquake,nuclear radiation,tsunami,Dam burst ,Hurricane, KATRINA , 9/11 2001 WTC Tragedy, 26/11 2008 mumbai serial blast.scientist welcome to see and test FIT
vksonakia@yahoo.co.in
unified field scientist
India
vksonakia 6 months ago
The reason why quantum mechanics and relativity are not unified is because Chuck Norris travelled back in time to the Big Bang and roundhouse-kicked the Theory of Everything in the face.
p7byrd 6 months ago
Do these people not know about String Theory, specifically M-Theory???
midnightclub0019 6 months ago
@midnightclub0019 Yeah but the problem is they don't work together. Getting relativity and m theory together would equal the theory of everything.
lightitupfool 6 months ago
How can you apply a theory of gravity to the particles that actually cause the process of gravity? I think science needs to figure out what causes mass before it starts making up shit about what gravity is!
MsWanderer1 6 months ago
@MsWanderer1 "before it starts making up shit about what gravity is!"
can you name this "shit" in more detail please so I can refute your argument.
I'm guessing you have a far better understanding of what gravity is?
RTRVII 6 months ago
@RTRVII
More detail so you can REFUTE me? :-)
To comprehend what "gravity is" requires a comprehension of what causes "mass"; to understand that you need a better paradigm for motion. You'll also need to be a bit more skeptical of the physics you THINK you know. Our equations tell us how gravity works with objects that have the property of mass; they do not tell us the cause of mass or gravity. Mass and energy are both measured properties of matter; they are not autonomous entities!
MsWanderer1 6 months ago
@MsWanderer1 which is why science isn't perfect. Scientists are constantly at the drawing board trying to solve some of the largest questions known to man.
reepermaple 6 months ago
And just to illustrate how science is constantly changing, your grandparents probably believed in what goes up, must come down. However, if I were to throw an apple upward at 11.2km/s or more, and if it didn't collide with any other body it would continue and never come down, (unless you invoke some symmetrical theories, but that's when physics all goes to hell.)
reepermaple 6 months ago
The solution of uniting those theories... Is right in front of you guys! Hint: Look at atom, on how an electron orbits the nucleus, and then look at how two black holes orbit each other! See any difference? Did you get the idea?
danielbluesmoke 7 months ago
@danielbluesmoke Two black holes eventually come together, forming a super black hole. The electron just keeps going around and around the nucleus much faster than the black hole orbits eachother. Funny thing is that if the electrons orbit too fast, it will fly away from the nucleus, eventually just bouncing around, but still has some force pulling towards the nucleus. But if same is with black holes that eventually fly away from eachother if fast, they can eventually leave eachother's gravity.
warriorofguitar 7 months ago
@warriorofguitar Two black holes orbiting each other, resembles the same pattern as electrons orbiting the nucleus. Keep in mind that those black holes reach the speed of light just before merging, and they generate gravity waves. Now in case of atoms, the situation might be very different, but check out the "Schwarzschild proton" theory. This could throw out the window the standard model, since it assumes that in the center of each proton/neutron is a black hole.
danielbluesmoke 7 months ago
Isn't it pronounced f-ER-mi like Enrico Fermi not f-AR-mi
1KevinsFamousChili1 7 months ago
Is light eternal?
Since light travels such distances, does that mean it exists until it is absorbed by an object?
JOHNINCOLUMBUS 7 months ago
if space time isn't like invisible bubble wrap then what is it?
Giant bubble wrap
Aki1011001 8 months ago
nasa's fermi mission is but A mouse-ion for raising founds. non of what nasa does is truely physics it is merely description of how humanity should fight to prevail regardless of how eminent is their collective death. GRAVE E.T. the smoking ass from behind the universe's bottom it's all a mirage E to the WC^2. bullshit rampancy.
dedanoe 8 months ago
HELL YEAH EINSTEIN'S STILL THE BEST
sirsagan 9 months ago
maybe dark matter has a reflective index that's not 1, this would slow down shorter wavelength photos more
vk45de 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Boy have I got news for you people - see my videos
HeliumXenonKrypton 9 months ago
Could the difference between quantum and classical physics be because quantum physics represents the passage of time itself?
This theory is based on just two postulates,
1. The first is that the quantum wave particle function explained by Schrödinger’s wave equation represents the forward passage of time or Arrow of Time photon by photon.
2. The second is that Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that is formed by the wave function is the same uncertainty we have with any future event.
nickharvey7 9 months ago
The idea is that at subatomic levels, space time is not smooth and continuous.. And so, a high energy, high frequency photon with very short wavelengths, traveling in this warped and jagged space time fabric would experience resistance due to interference by the space time fabric.. However a low frequency low energy photon has wavelengths far higher than the fine roughness of the space-time fabric, and thus experience no resistance when traveling through space-time..
remoraid7 9 months ago
It is known that space can bend light, and by passing it through large distances in space, we can study how the fabric of space time affect the behavior of light across different frequencies of the EM spectrum.. And since the EM spectrum consists of a large variety of wavelength, from gamma rays of wavelengths less than the diameter of an electron to radio waves with wavelength longer than that of a football field, it is the perfect candidate for the test..
remoraid7 9 months ago
@remoraid7 space can bend light???... is that in sense of extreme generalization??
exceptional1414 9 months ago
Einstein's relativity suggests that the space time fabric is smooth and continuous.. While quantum physics says that no.. At subatomic levels, the space time fabric is not smooth.. In fact it's very rough, violent and unpredictable.. What we are trying to figure is if space time fabric is really sandpaper, or smooth rubber..
remoraid7 9 months ago
i think there is a flaw in these concepts. particles do not exist until the wave energy they comprise is collapsed at a confined location, i.e. until someone observes them. before that they are standing wave without any location. it may well be that the speed of light is just an effect that depends on a finite speed of physical observation. the speed of observation has never been considered, but i guess it also conforms to an uncertainty principle. thus the speed of light is not exactly constant
rinchendawa 9 months ago
@badsalad313 No, I was saying it doesn't work. Your referring to "The Law" a boundary set by mankind using their free will. I was talking about this "gods" gift of free will to man...
Your "metaphoric description" doesn't work.
MrRyanification 11 months ago
is the speed of sight the speed of light.? dont blink
daelohmen 11 months ago
@daelohmen No...The speed of light is much faster than the nerve impulses traveling from your eyes to you brain.
Basically you never see anything exactly as it currently exists, you see it as it was as the light bounced off of it, before it traveled to your eyes and was compiled into a coherent image by your brain.
MrAudiovideodisco 9 months ago
@MrAudiovideodisco cool i never thought of it that way b4 thanx
daelohmen 9 months ago
@daelohmen theres no speed of sight, light become in contact with something and that light go to your eyes, your eyes capture that, and your brain process it, that is sight
AdolphX 9 months ago
@daelohmen no, nerve impulses travel at an average of I believe 340m/s, light travels at 300,000,000m/s
Helge129 9 months ago
super cool...thanks
DavidBylsma 11 months ago
Unification of the extreme chasms?
The "M" Theory; via Graviton study-
..but that news is at least 6 or 7 years old by now (2011)...
MarcusDarling4026 11 months ago
its like they told me noting with alot of words
ridimwave 1 year ago
"Answers may lie in the journey of two photons across 7 billion light years in space.... and these two tiny _PARTICLES_..."
particles = something with mass, right? photons doesnt have mass >(
shakedown33 1 year ago
@shakedown33 Apparently, not:
"In the physical sciences, a particle is a small localized object to which can be ascribed several physical properties such as volume or mass. The word is rather general in meaning, and is refined as needed by various scientific fields."
So physics would just refine photon as "massless particle which ...."
StrikaAmaru 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Einstein was wrong about Relativity
agathangelidisantonis.blogspot.com
argiman1 1 year ago
whell SHURE einstine could have bin wrong but the overall was a good idea nontheless
jannikmt 1 year ago
lol nasa= NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER
danzinnyman 1 year ago
Time is a constant,all the rest can change.
this can be easily proven by a simple 'Theorem'...
FreitasPh11th 1 year ago
Cool
ShallowThoughts 1 year ago
If you drove a boat through molasses and a boat through water they would travel the same speed.
sug15 1 year ago
Very cool..
missuniversemusic 1 year ago
what bugs me is people debate about religious stuff instead of the quantum mechanics in the video... one big palm face
zanaelf 1 year ago
@zanaelf Yeah this video mentioned nothing about religion.....
entrailsgalore 1 year ago
@entrailsgalore Yes :-)
zanaelf 1 year ago
Well, to all the religious folks here: If you already have the answers in your Bible, why bother watching this video? In fact, why would you need to spread the word of God? Everyone already knows where it can be found -- in your moldy, old book.
carlesul 1 year ago
You know one thing I didn't understand about science is when somebody says, "It was too miniscule to affect it." Just by being miniscule doesn't it affect it? Maybe not as much as something smaller, but isn't it still affected and altered by it?
skullking777 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks for video.
Linen products are easy to store, they can withstand temperature differentials and the toughest washings, which make them even softer, whiter, and more clinging to the body. You can find best linen fabric store on my profile, or just visit:
linen-fabric. net
All over the world people want to use only natural and environmentally friendly materials like linen and cotton!
linenfabricwholesale 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the Establishment doesn't want ppl to know this,Go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and get the blueprints for a genuine magnet motor ,Join the revolution!
despinapjr 1 year ago
God no bubblewrap no two down at lest cool i cant wait till the t-shirt great
fallbread 1 year ago
The fact is man's science is already in favor of a Creator so don't even try to put yourself above me with your sarcastic remark.
DLando 1 year ago
God's Science is unimaginable, beyond the scope of the human mind. The physical universe is only a glimpse of God's creativity.
DLando 1 year ago
Astonishing that on the other side of humanity we have all this knowledge and science and amazing development. And on the other side we have religion.
Useless superstition still holds billions in its grasp. Its embarassing and ridiculous.
bary1234 1 year ago
I don't think light would help us with the final secrets of the universe.. Maybe Space travel but
thats it
savagekid94 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HavokOnePointZero phyrexious...u damn homo!! dont be so anti-church u damn homo!
haha, you're going to hell for swearing!
shibbyobibbyo 1 year ago
Religious nuts hate science. And trhat's not too strange..science is doing a pretty good job of a#¤-f¤#king the religions, more and more every day of course. I think that even many christtards/jewtards or muslimtards really know that religion/superstition is losing, hehe.: )
winterstellar 1 year ago
i love her accent :)
myco578 1 year ago
again it all depends on your construct of reality and space and time. Because all can be different at one point then change in a matter of seconds.
cybernako088 1 year ago
i believe that someday the scientists will find the missing part and that they will answer a lot of questions
but
i also believe , in every time we solve a puzzle we will face a puzzle that is harder to solve
the study of the universe is like a mission that is impossible to solve.
even though i am a chemist , i am very very interested in this amazing field of science.
khaled1988able 1 year ago
Comment removed
khaled1988able 1 year ago
I never understood how there can be a texture or fabric to space if space is supposed to be nothing... how does nothing have any attributes at all?
thorsmitersaw 1 year ago
lol @ that dudes tea pot pose ....oh and that woman looks like she has downs.
IHateYourFaceYo 1 year ago
Thumbs up of you think the host guy looks like a pervert O_O
donth4ck 1 year ago
Relativity is nothing more than a mathematical methodology to correct for variances due to motion and the limits of data collection to the speed of light. There are NO ABSOLUTE REFERENCES. Quantum Mechanics is also basically only a mathematical methodology. Realize a proper paradigm of reality and there will be no conflict between the two.
BTW: spacetime is just another name for aether and light is a wave in that spacetime aether medium; NOT a particle. Also; string theory is BS!
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 no
khaled1988able 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1
there is something called the standard model in particle physics that proposed many things and suggested the presence of many particles
all of these based on QM
the accelerators and many other exps proved that this is true
khaled1988able 1 year ago
@khaled1988able
YES!!!
I've always wondered how someone barely out of his teenage years can acquire greater knowledge and experience than someone who has spent almost 50 years in several science fields; did you learn all that while still sucking your mother's tit or did it come to you through osmosis? You arrogant stupid children are quite annoying when you demonstrate your ignorance online!
You need to stop watching the Discovery Channel and thinking it give you a PhD in physics!
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 hahahahahahahahahahaha thank you any way for your tact (i have read more than 20 books about this area of science )
all the scientists that have changed the humanity life and have proposed all the dominant theories , all of them was a young men not an old people like you
and i conclude that you have no imagination
someday you will wake up , then you will realize that you've wasted your time for nothing except depreciating the others .
khaled1988able 1 year ago
@khaled1988able
Holy shit; you are so ignorant. The greatest advances in science came from old folk like me. You don't even seem to have a high school physics education!
Subscribe to the trade journals; 20 "Cat In The Hat" science books only teach what sells to you general public geniuses. Unfortunately some good scientists have to publish crap like that to simply earn a living; their academic jobs don't pay shit!
Now; why don't you tell us more of your scientific enlightenment? :-))
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 all of the issues that have been raised by an old people have an ordinary level and any body can think about or discover
but the complex one have been raised by a young scientists
you know i will never replay you again because of your speaking level
unless you show me your academic level ,because your words show that you have nothing to do with science at all.
khaled1988able 1 year ago
@khaled1988able
Thanks so much for your comic entertainment! :-)
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 Do you think its possible to build space-time barrier?
TobiramaSenju 1 year ago
@TobiramaSenju
Do you think it's possible to build a thought barrier? What would you build it out of?
Space-time and thought are both abstracts and have no physical properties; the only difference is that space-time is a mathematical abstract used to correct for our observational variances and measurement limitations.
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 Thoughts don't have physical properties.But thoughts effect the whole being.
But what does Gravity bend if space-time is an abstract?I
TobiramaSenju 1 year ago
@TobiramaSenju
I would suggest you join a science or physics blog web-site; your questions require a great deal more study on your part. Review the Stanford YouTube account for some excellent video lectures on Relativity and many other topics.
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 You don't know?
Mass bends space and that curvature is called gravity.
TobiramaSenju 1 year ago
@TobiramaSenju
LOL; Actually NO it does not; MASS bends "space-time" as defended by Einstein's GR and space-time is a mathematical abstract. In Einstein's Relativity, space-time is just another word for ether! You are making the assumption that the cause of mass is known; the Higggs Boson is one theory that has not been proven yet; read up on your Feynman. If space can be bent then it is a physical entity; what is it? Do as I suggested; then ask the right questions.
BTW: I DO KNOW! :-)
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 Then what is space-time curvature?And what is gravity?
TobiramaSenju 1 year ago
@TobiramaSenju
I believe this video stated that Relativity is a methodology to allow different reference frames to measure the same events and acquire the same data. Space-time is one of the abstracts of the equations that make this possible. Don’t allow simple physics to be turned into a complex quagmire of BS explanations of mathematical terms.
"What is gravity"? Do you want the textbook answer or would you like a more accurate description other than "a force property of mass"?
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 I want to know what is space-time CURVATURE?
TobiramaSenju 1 year ago
@TobiramaSenju -- Curvature in Space-time produces Gravity.
MarvelsofaLifetime 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 Well that depends. Does a Techion exist in all levels or only the one you thing it does. What is the spark of conciousness? Here is a chaotic theory what if the reason the this teenager has greater knowledge is because he is you in an alternate existance. perharps he has studied this before and now in this time he can use it. perhaps all is random and nothing has sense even if a 1 plus 1 is 2. What if its 1 plus 1 is 11 or even 20000000000!
cybernako088 1 year ago
@cybernako088
Stop watching the Discovery Channel! :-)
MsWanderer1 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 why im getting knowledge to better understand myself and the universe.
cybernako088 1 year ago
@MsWanderer1 you might just be the single smartest troll EVER
pato1996 1 year ago
Comment removed
winterstellar 1 year ago
most likely they're trolls
ledestroyer 1 year ago
science was created to understand how god worked. In fact the idea came in a dream were an angel dictated the basis for science. And just because some assholes hijacked the idea of a god doesnt make it any less likely. God is a word and you can associate many things to it. Could just be another word for "everything". but why get out of bed? well, its all about the experience so why not? so much anger on both sides shows both are blind..
8u80n1k 1 year ago
see, that is the problem with scientist. they overthink things. oh one photon arrives before another. that would be the clear answer. but noooo, they have to overthink it and say well maybe not, maybe some little fabricky stuff changes it
petrafied77 1 year ago
Your God is Dead. Killer=Internet. Bye bye
Neueregel 1 year ago
so this means that our thoughts and feelings are being caught by light particle/waves through the rotating axes of spacetime? and that when we die we will travel the light beams to the most amazing flights of fancy?
officialresearch 1 year ago
@officialresearch it's my watch, it's broken
officialresearch 1 year ago
like.
advent141 2 years ago
Maybe the two photons move together in unison in some sort of parter like a couple of dancer dancing in unison. Causing them arrive in the exact same time.
chocogalarza 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
indeed
FIGHTFANNERD3 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
science is evil it wont save the human race only god can
why waste your time on science its not going to do anything for us
FIGHTFANNERD3 2 years ago
Why get out of bed? Only god can think, so why act at all? Why waste your time with life at all; why not just end it now so you can go visit your friend in the sky? After all, the whole purpose of this life is to be a test for the next; right?
What a pile-o-$%&#. Try some logic yourself for once, rather than blindly trudging through your short life with mysticism; you might be surprised.
TheDrunkard1 2 years ago 29
@TheDrunkard1 Why bother you say? Why do anything and just let god handle things, you ask? There's nothing logical about god, so I don't think I'll do that. If you think people of science believe we're alive as a test run for the next life, study your textbooks a bit more. We don't KNOW what comes after this dimension we're in, could be oblivion, could be a raise in consciousness. Either or, it has nothing to do with organized religion and if you think so, you're missing so much!
Ptinski 1 year ago
@Ptinski I was being sarcastic to the theist. I was taking an over-the-top look at where belief in an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent overlord would logically leave one. I can't believe you didn't catch that...hehe.
TheDrunkard1 1 year ago
@TheDrunkard1 i understand what you mean however do you not fall also in his or her level. You fallow logic that seems to work for you, but if i may add some chaos into it. If the number twelve is drawn with a rainbowed patten is it a color or a number. That depends on what your looking at the color or the number. so you see the number but he or she sees the colors. Combine the two and you get actual picture. The question is was there a number with color to begin with?
cybernako088 1 year ago
@cybernako088
I believe in subjective perception, yes. The problem begins when we state our perceptions as completely objective, especially when those perceptions are not based on evidence. There must be a common experience in which we can all share, else even language falls apart. The only common experience is what we call reality, that conglomeration of objects as they actually are (not as they may appear or how we want them to be). Unobservable objects are beyond our scope.
TheDrunkard1 1 year ago
@TheDrunkard1 do you need evidence to know that you breath and live? just because you cant see it those not rule out the fact that it does existce. like the wind you breath it yet you can't see it yet it has the power to uproot the very earth. open your mind stop being afraid and rigid flow like water. or is it because your emotions are so irradic or so dim that life is just a series of numbers and events with no meaning? im only asking to shift our perspetive add to your knowledge and grow.
cybernako088 1 year ago
@cybernako088
I believe I'm doing just that. I was extremely religious for nearly all-my-life but I've managed a complete shift in my thinking. It was difficult to say the least. Such a transition requires openness and a love for truth. I've come to realize that not all others share my love for truth, seeking to fulfill other needs first. This may not be a bad thing in some instances (love, etc) but stagnates one in other instances. Truth is a requirement to understanding, don't you think? :)
TheDrunkard1 1 year ago
@TheDrunkard1 yes and no it depends on what your trying to understand. but alas we can only continue t explorer just don't get to caught up in the detail that you miss te bigger picture peace
cybernako088 1 year ago
@cybernako088
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "the bigger picture." We only have our immediate, "pseudo-section" of the universe to understand and explore. Anything "bigger" is beyond our scope, therefore speculative or even imaginary. I understand that there is still much beyond our silly-little bit of understanding but make-believe in regards to its nature should not compete with actual science. We need a common foundation upon which to build and communicate logic.
TheDrunkard1 1 year ago
@TheDrunkard1 Here is a mathematical equation for you, your logic = incorrect conclusion
DLando 1 year ago
@TheDrunkard1 mysticism is logic.. you sir is lost in a constant haze of confusion.. i believe life's purpose is to know why YOU exist..
iMpRiSoNeD44 1 year ago
@iMpRiSoNeD44 That's beautiful; It's nice to see you've found a purpose, although delusional.
TheDrunkard1 1 year ago
or some of us look at the real world around us as a how and not a why. the scientific process is fundementally flawed in telling anything about the metaphysical. thats why its called physics, and not metaphysics. i dont really believe in the stories of the bible myself, but it says nothing about before light but that god existed. i bet big bang theorists felt a little something after ironically showing how much sense it makes verbatim and even showing why light came before day or the sun.
Pimpmastahanhduece 1 year ago
@Pimpmastahanhduece Excellent points. Well, taken. :)
TheDrunkard1 1 year ago
thank you, take care
Pimpmastahanhduece 1 year ago
but the worst part of your argument is that there are two paths, athiests and believing, either god or some direct contact in his stead appears for all to see and the believers are triumphant, or athiests complain about a paradoxed question until the Great Freeze. you can liken religion to imaginary or apparitions,but youll never prove it. and until something miraculous comes,believers cant prove your wrong since they only have scripture to reference.
be logical,be civil, and just accept people
Pimpmastahanhduece 1 year ago
i think the point is that the speed of light is a misnomer. if youve ever taken calculus and know about limits youd understand. anything can come extremely close the speed of light, including photons. its just that photons may be infinity close to the C, but in true velocity is can only be described at "speed of light<C" and not "speed of light <= C", or as velocity approaches C; Df(v)= infinity. C should be a constant in its own right and not reserved to photons in a vacuum.
Pimpmastahanhduece 1 year ago
go live in the cave you retard
stevekad1 2 years ago
typical religious idiot
Mattothee 2 years ago
You mean like the invention of antibiotics and vaccinations didn't do anything? Or do you mean like electricity and IT? What about the printing press or transportation - those are surely examples of something that isn't doing anything - right?
Science has done more to help humanity than your "God" ever will.
DigitizedSelf 2 years ago 19
sigh...whats with people and not looking at science as how and religion as why? either a miracle will happen and believers will be vindicated, or athiests can wait until the last proton decays in quiet desperation. is it so weird someone who believes firmly in god sees the innovation of man in medicine and other great technologies? how bout we keep physics and metaphysics separate?
Pimpmastahanhduece 1 year ago
god is evil and it wont save the human race. only science can.
why waste your time on god? he cant do anything because he isnt real.
Ah.... better.
polop1234 2 years ago
if there wasn't science you wouldn't be able to type the comment. god didnt create transistors man did.
uut0 2 years ago
@beechgroveHO - you're a moron. Trying to be smart. You're arguments have no substance. Just like religion. No substance. Science? Puts the fancy nike shoes on your feet bitch
texasteabag 2 years ago
How do you know the large and small light waves left at the same time? usually in an explosion, there could be more then 1 ignition point, a secondary explosion or even a dual sided explosion (coming from 2 ends at different distances form you satellite Ermes) for an accurate test or theory on this, you would have to control the explosion
2012DarkKnight 2 years ago
jeddah, you are doing noble work, i will see you back on K-PAX
hrd2imagin 2 years ago
Aha, yes how many people have killed themselves because of some illiterate fool spouting a great wisdom about great changes that only they know about.
The world changes every second of every day, there's no great wisdoms behind it, it just happens.
If anyone tells you that they have an answer to the changes or the reasons why things are changing beyond what we actually know is a liar simple as that.
Krippers 2 years ago
In darkness one is as blind as in blinding light.
omegavalerius 2 years ago
WHY is there always some religious nut whining about these science video's?
Go waste your time in church and do us all a favor and keep your ignorance between you and your imaginary friend.
Thank you.
Phyrexious 2 years ago 64
That was pretty ignorant of you. Do you need to go to church too?
tornadoforce117 2 years ago
No I don't, but I'm glad you agree that churchgoers are stupid.
Phyrexious 2 years ago
I didn't agree to anything. I was simply being a smart ass. =]
tornadoforce117 2 years ago
@Phyrexious its also ignorant to think that theres no god com-on you should know better.
Erickpv07 1 year ago
Why is it ignorant to think there is no god? All our precessors who believed in the other 1000ths of gods have been WRONG.
Thor, Loki, Odin, Zeus, Apollo, Ra, Venus, Poseidon, you name it, all utter nonsense. The chance Christians or any other religion has got it right is statistically less than 0.1%.
It's kinda pathetic really that theists never learn. They all think they got it right, that they have the right god this time... just like those Zeus believers before them.
Phyrexious 1 year ago
@Phyrexious Exactly thats why they're all gone because of their ignorance even the Aztecs went down from all of their gods to a single one , the one above all the alpha and the omega, just look it up" fractals" ," the golden mean" its no coincidence god is everywhere man.
Erickpv07 1 year ago
Fractals = god? Haha, that's hilarious.
Your god has become so vague it lost all it's meaning. Don't worry, every made-up god in our history gradually lost meaning, it's only natural.
Phyrexious 1 year ago
@Phyrexious For your information there are scientists who believe in God. The complexity of macrocosmos, microcosmos and life points to a Creator - God. Did you not know that God is the ultimate Scientist...Science only re-affirms what God had already done.
DLando 1 year ago
@DLando
Throughout history the made up gods have lost their power whenever mankind discovered the real physics behind it. Arora Borealis, lightning, the sun, you name it and a god was responsible before we could rid ourselves from the ignorance on the subject. Appearantly you're still stuck believing a magical being is the answer to it all, yet it tells you *nothing*. All you've done is replace X with Y and fool yourself into thinking you've got the answer.
Phyrexious 1 year ago
DLando, you didn't provide any arguments for your statements. All life points to a creator? Maybe if you ignore the facts that tell you otherwise...
How would you explain the fact that we have a direct FUSION of 2 chimp genes in our genetic code. (We have 1 chromosome pair less and the fused one is rare and matches perfectly). Did your precious god use chimp DNA to make humans? If not, you have no answer yet evolution has a perfectly valid one.
Please, humor me and give your explanation.
Phyrexious 1 year ago
And that's just one of MANY examples where a creator makes no sense whatsoever whereas evolution predicted the outcome before it was even discovered.
If you're done answering my DNA question maybe you could enlighten us on the following examples:
Why do fish on the bottom of the ocean have blind eyes? Evolution predicts that as they go deeper with less sunlight they eventually lose their sight because it's not needed anymore. Did your god just gave them blind eyes for fun 'n giggles?
Phyrexious 1 year ago
And last but not least, why do dandelions have the yellow flower when they reproduce Asexually. Meaning they don't need pollination anymore and thus the yellow flower is obselete.
Did you god once again just had a brain fart and gave them flowers for being pretty?
The evolutionary story actually makes sence and is backed up by the evidence that dandelions used to reproduce with the help of pollination but gradually changed over time to reproduce asexually and still have a vestigial flower.
Phyrexious 1 year ago
@Phyrexious Why do you even think the way you do? Because God gave you a mind to reason. I don't have to go into quantum physics, complex mathematics, particles of the microcosmos, the behavior of macrocosmos, the components of DNA, and the enormous probability of life occurring by itself without a Creator. The bottom line is I have hope and you don't. You can continue to deny God if you want but if you are curious about the difference between man's science and God's Science hint:God's enormous
DLando 1 year ago
@DLando
Ah how typical, you ignore my examples, stick your head in the sand about the facts, and just head straight over to the preaching.
You sir, you just lost an argument. Good day.
Phyrexious 1 year ago
@Phyrexious And you have just lost your chance in entering the Kingdom of God, a spiritual realm outside of space and time and the physical universe. Your life will end without ever knowing the mind of God. Stuck in man's science which is far below God's Science.
DLando 1 year ago
@DLando
Yeah keep wishing for another life while wasting your time in the only one life you know for sure is real. All time time praying to someone who's not there, just like all the Muslims and Hindu's in the world think THEIR god is real, and how believers in Zeus, Ra, Vishnu, Odin and thousands of others prayed to their non-existent god. So sad.
You are SO sure you found the real god this time, JUST LIKE all the other theists throughout history whose gods we now both agree are BS.
Phyrexious 1 year ago
@Phyrexious Your right about the other gods, The true God exposed them as false. No I'm not wasting my time and life. I'm living my life and I have confidence in God who will resurrect and extend the lives of those who believe and accept God. Man has only seen a small part of God's creation. God set the parameters of what man can observe and discover, man cannot go beyond that unless you accept God. You can't go outside of space and time, the physical universe into the spiritual on your own.
DLando 1 year ago