really don't like brady, bradshaw over staubach when both QB's won championships they were ok qbs on really good teams, and if you are measuring qbs on SB then aikman should be on ur list also marino should be #1 he is the best qb ever
If you base that on stats, championships won, and the ability to play well for below par teams, then sorry, Brady doesn't make the cut. Bart Starr, Otto Graham, Terry Bradshaw, Brett Favre, Roger Staubach, Joe Montana, Johnny Unitas, Joe Namath, Bob Griese, Sid Luckman, Sammy Baugh, Len Dawson, Bob Waterfield, Norm VAn Brocklin, John Brodie, Troy Aikman, Jim Kelly, Dan Marino, John ELway, Ben Rothelsberger, Kurt Warner, Jim Plunkett, Donovan McNabb,,,,,
are you kidding me? Brady played increidble when he had an awful recieving corp. Yeah he had a record year when he got good ones, but that doesn't chance the fact he still makes the passes. How many of those guys have won more then 3 super bowls? He's been in 4 in 9 years. He's broken records, won championships AND played good with shitty recievers. Good try though hahaha
how can you say that when he won three championships with sub par talent........ when he finally got some real talent around him he showed what he could do
coleio, last time I checked, Montana and Bradsahw have four SB wins. Aikman has three, Graham played pre SB, and has 6 championship wins, and Brady has had steller defenses through his career, and now has a stocked WR core. sub par talent around him,?! Yeah, that's why NE had top five ranked OL's through Brady's career as well. Nice try guys.
so your saying Brady has won from great talent, but then you throw Montana, Bradshaw, AND Aikman out there, ALL who had better talent surrounding them than Brady. Montana had rice, an amazing defence, and all pro runningback. Bradshaw was surrounded by arguably the greatest team in history. AIkman has one of the best runningbacks of all time. Ya brady had a decent defence but it wasn't anything special.
Actually, you could make the arguement that Montana, Bradshaw, and Aikman all started off with horrible teams, where Brady inherited a team that already was close to being play off calibur.
Bradshaw threw hella ints in his career and bradshaws team was like invicible they were the team of the decade. Terry Bradshaw had all that great talent around him
Franco Harris, Lynn Swann, John Stallworth
Defense JOE GREENE, jack lambert, jack ham, mel blount
I dont like bradshaw at all though because look at his records his QB rating is almost in the 60's he threw as many int as touchdowns so there is no way you should consider him better than brady.
Montana did have a good team all the pieces were there already. Bill Walsh took over and built that team not liek jerry rice would have sucked without joe montana. Montana left, Jerry Rice still did amazing with Steve Young AND Rich Gannon.
I think you just hate Tom Brady because everybody today watched him win too much and they are sick of it. Tom Brady before Randy Moss had Troy Brown and Deion Branch to throw to and never had a good Runningback. Branch is a nobody now after leaving.
Brady is definitely better than aikman because he has 2 superbowl MVP 1 Regular season MVP and statistically Brady is already better than Aikman
Aikman Played 11 years
Brady is like on his 10th year and he has already thrown for more
Touchdowns
Less Interceptions
Yardage
and a QB rating 10 points higher than Aikman.
Aikman had a good Offense and Defense too so dont even try to compare. The 3 QB ur arguing for their receivers are in the HOF troy brown and branch will never be HOFers
You mentioned about Montana having a good team? You really should study history. First, the 49ers were medicore team, and a roster filled with journeyman players when Montana started for them.
As for throwing too many INT's, then you must not think much of the career leader in INT's, Brett Favre. Brady is a great quarterback. Bradshaw won 4 sb's, and never lost one. Brady hasn't.
Bradshaw called his own plays, Brady doesn't. Then again, not many qb's call their own plays anymore.
Montana did have a good team i dont care if it started off mediocre it didnt take long before everyone developed. You cannot give credit to Joe Montana for that team being good. Bill Walsh deserved all the credit. When Montana left the 49ers they still were able to win another Superbowl. Brett Favre yes has the most career INT but he has the MOST TOUCHDOWNS. Bradshaws career was like 212td and 200int with like a 70QB rating. I say Brady is better than Bradshaw and Aikman.
I'll give you that Brady is higher then Aikman, based onn play off record alone, but the Steelers were a run and grind team with fleet recievers. It wasn't about the deep pass for them. Brady was the product of a pass first run second offense, the exact opporsite.
btw, the 49ers were basement dwellers when Montana took over, the team was built around Montana.
Im not gonna argue on Montana anymore I agree with you that he is the best Quarterback. That team had a huge support system 5 of the players Montana played with are either HOFers or Going to be next year.
Brady pass first offense is because they have to. Patriots if you have not notice they do not have a good run game. They never had a good RB Brady never had a great WR because of the mediocre help around him compared to Bradshaw I say Brady is better. Brady has better stats anyway.
If New England had beaten the Giants and gone undefeated, then an argument could be made for having Brady over Bradshaw. Fact is that Bradshaw never lost a super bowl, which rates him over Brady.
that's a completely stupid reason to rate Bradshaw over Brady. How do u even justify that kind of reasoning its completely stupid. I mean Bradshaw has never led a team 16-0 and he had all the tools to do it. With that kind of reasoning i guess Aikman is better than Elway, Marino, and Brett Favre Think carefully before you even decide to say yes to what i just said. Bradshaw has a pathetic QB rating. Brady is 20 pts higher than Bradshaw For a QB rating and tied 2 superbowl MVPs and has more TDs
again tom at #8? this video is full of shit fuck all of the other qb tom is the best
krieg213 1 month ago
Dan Marino is in the top two ever not number five
kingfootball89 1 month ago
How is brady not in the top 5 how is fran tarkenton even on the list and how farve only 7 this is coming from lions fan f y i
lilbuck9842 4 months ago
no montana? and staubach not n the top 10? my 8 yar old grandmother knows more football than u do
ronan1321 4 months ago
No Joe Namath? No Kenny Stabler?
Crap. Pure crap.
PooPoo2U 7 months ago
watch my top 5 video it has highlights and a great list
peytonmanningfan7 10 months ago
same crap. more dislikes than likes.
xxSonyBoy1xx 1 year ago
old one is better
menumber81 1 year ago
Comment removed
McCoySux 2 years ago
Take a look at my list guys! for top ten QBs
missionbears 2 years ago
Farve should be ahead of manning and Graham higher for sure
Timmyh077 2 years ago
really don't like brady, bradshaw over staubach when both QB's won championships they were ok qbs on really good teams, and if you are measuring qbs on SB then aikman should be on ur list also marino should be #1 he is the best qb ever
cowboysfan08s 2 years ago
favre #1, 3 mvps, tops easily
runninbak32akacman 2 years ago
Tom Brady? Not even in my top 15 all time, he barely makes top 20 all time.
quietriotfan1976 3 years ago
well your an idiot then
coleio17 2 years ago
If you base that on stats, championships won, and the ability to play well for below par teams, then sorry, Brady doesn't make the cut. Bart Starr, Otto Graham, Terry Bradshaw, Brett Favre, Roger Staubach, Joe Montana, Johnny Unitas, Joe Namath, Bob Griese, Sid Luckman, Sammy Baugh, Len Dawson, Bob Waterfield, Norm VAn Brocklin, John Brodie, Troy Aikman, Jim Kelly, Dan Marino, John ELway, Ben Rothelsberger, Kurt Warner, Jim Plunkett, Donovan McNabb,,,,,
quietriotfan1976 2 years ago
are you kidding me? Brady played increidble when he had an awful recieving corp. Yeah he had a record year when he got good ones, but that doesn't chance the fact he still makes the passes. How many of those guys have won more then 3 super bowls? He's been in 4 in 9 years. He's broken records, won championships AND played good with shitty recievers. Good try though hahaha
coleio17 2 years ago
how can you say that when he won three championships with sub par talent........ when he finally got some real talent around him he showed what he could do
hipo250 2 years ago
coleio, last time I checked, Montana and Bradsahw have four SB wins. Aikman has three, Graham played pre SB, and has 6 championship wins, and Brady has had steller defenses through his career, and now has a stocked WR core. sub par talent around him,?! Yeah, that's why NE had top five ranked OL's through Brady's career as well. Nice try guys.
quietriotfan1976 2 years ago
so your saying Brady has won from great talent, but then you throw Montana, Bradshaw, AND Aikman out there, ALL who had better talent surrounding them than Brady. Montana had rice, an amazing defence, and all pro runningback. Bradshaw was surrounded by arguably the greatest team in history. AIkman has one of the best runningbacks of all time. Ya brady had a decent defence but it wasn't anything special.
hipo250 2 years ago
Actually, you could make the arguement that Montana, Bradshaw, and Aikman all started off with horrible teams, where Brady inherited a team that already was close to being play off calibur.
quietriotfan1976 2 years ago
Bradshaw threw hella ints in his career and bradshaws team was like invicible they were the team of the decade. Terry Bradshaw had all that great talent around him
Franco Harris, Lynn Swann, John Stallworth
Defense JOE GREENE, jack lambert, jack ham, mel blount
I dont like bradshaw at all though because look at his records his QB rating is almost in the 60's he threw as many int as touchdowns so there is no way you should consider him better than brady.
missionbears 2 years ago
Montana did have a good team all the pieces were there already. Bill Walsh took over and built that team not liek jerry rice would have sucked without joe montana. Montana left, Jerry Rice still did amazing with Steve Young AND Rich Gannon.
I think you just hate Tom Brady because everybody today watched him win too much and they are sick of it. Tom Brady before Randy Moss had Troy Brown and Deion Branch to throw to and never had a good Runningback. Branch is a nobody now after leaving.
missionbears 2 years ago
Brady is definitely better than aikman because he has 2 superbowl MVP 1 Regular season MVP and statistically Brady is already better than Aikman
Aikman Played 11 years
Brady is like on his 10th year and he has already thrown for more
Touchdowns
Less Interceptions
Yardage
and a QB rating 10 points higher than Aikman.
Aikman had a good Offense and Defense too so dont even try to compare. The 3 QB ur arguing for their receivers are in the HOF troy brown and branch will never be HOFers
missionbears 2 years ago
You mentioned about Montana having a good team? You really should study history. First, the 49ers were medicore team, and a roster filled with journeyman players when Montana started for them.
As for throwing too many INT's, then you must not think much of the career leader in INT's, Brett Favre. Brady is a great quarterback. Bradshaw won 4 sb's, and never lost one. Brady hasn't.
Bradshaw called his own plays, Brady doesn't. Then again, not many qb's call their own plays anymore.
quietriotfan1976 2 years ago
Montana did have a good team i dont care if it started off mediocre it didnt take long before everyone developed. You cannot give credit to Joe Montana for that team being good. Bill Walsh deserved all the credit. When Montana left the 49ers they still were able to win another Superbowl. Brett Favre yes has the most career INT but he has the MOST TOUCHDOWNS. Bradshaws career was like 212td and 200int with like a 70QB rating. I say Brady is better than Bradshaw and Aikman.
missionbears 2 years ago
I'll give you that Brady is higher then Aikman, based onn play off record alone, but the Steelers were a run and grind team with fleet recievers. It wasn't about the deep pass for them. Brady was the product of a pass first run second offense, the exact opporsite.
btw, the 49ers were basement dwellers when Montana took over, the team was built around Montana.
quietriotfan1976 2 years ago
Im not gonna argue on Montana anymore I agree with you that he is the best Quarterback. That team had a huge support system 5 of the players Montana played with are either HOFers or Going to be next year.
Brady pass first offense is because they have to. Patriots if you have not notice they do not have a good run game. They never had a good RB Brady never had a great WR because of the mediocre help around him compared to Bradshaw I say Brady is better. Brady has better stats anyway.
missionbears 2 years ago
If New England had beaten the Giants and gone undefeated, then an argument could be made for having Brady over Bradshaw. Fact is that Bradshaw never lost a super bowl, which rates him over Brady.
quietriotfan1976 2 years ago
that's a completely stupid reason to rate Bradshaw over Brady. How do u even justify that kind of reasoning its completely stupid. I mean Bradshaw has never led a team 16-0 and he had all the tools to do it. With that kind of reasoning i guess Aikman is better than Elway, Marino, and Brett Favre Think carefully before you even decide to say yes to what i just said. Bradshaw has a pathetic QB rating. Brady is 20 pts higher than Bradshaw For a QB rating and tied 2 superbowl MVPs and has more TDs
missionbears 2 years ago
whats the name of this song
badazz876 1 year ago
dude tarkenton should be on there but favre number 1 and graham 3 baugh 5
olhrocks 3 years ago
Tarkenton was a good quarterback, but no way he should be in the top 10. Where's Namath? Troy Aikman?
NYCman530 3 years ago
I am ussally a big fan of your lists. But this one freaking sucks! Reply me back and i'll give you my argument why
doom950324 3 years ago
ya give me some feedback
hipo250 3 years ago