j'aime "aussi" le jazz car la technique n'est pas aussi exigeante!!!
Et pourtant,il faut écouter T.MONK ,voir ce qu'il arrive à faire avec une technique limitée(mais : quelle oreille!!!) ou par contre écouter ART TATUM ou OSCAR PETERSON et se rendre compte que les jazzmen ne sont pas non plus des manchots!!!
I notice more and more people get impressed by such technique...I really do not give a damn, I look for interpretation and maturity. Being impressed by te speed of a pianist is annoying me, I get lost. I don't remember which virtusose learned octaves to his ingeneer neighbourg and the guy did in 2 weeks what he never succeeded to reach in a lifetime...thank God, piano is more than hitting the right notes as quickly as possible. Pianists become stars by increasing tempos nowadays...
I had the good fortune of meeting him about 20 years ago in Miami in a party after the recital. (It didn't cost me a penny). Before the meal, we went up to him and shook his hands and chatted. Already, we were wowed by his amazing technique. All I can remember was when we shook hands, I felt as I had shaken hands with SOLID STEEL. I don't think I will ever forget that.
This cadenza isn't meant to be musical. It's not developmental, it's not melodic, it's not pretty or ugly; it's got nothing whatever to do with the material which surrounds it. It's just an explosion out of nowhere and out of context, and that's the point: it's pure fire for the sake of showing off and that's it. And damn if it isn't fabulously effective.
He's certainly fast, and is phenomenal in that sense for sure, but it lacks the musical quality. Argerich is equally fast, but she still (somehow) manages to make it musical...
es un gran pianista, algunos podrian criticar su cierta falta de sensibilidad, pero aun asi, sus aptitudes y capacidades, son tan grandes que ya es capaz de cambiar de mil maneras sus interpretaciones. Existen muy buenas grabaciones con el.
Listen to the cadenzas of Rach. #3. These are music thus have musicality. The Tchaikovsky by comparison in my view has far less "music" and is just banging octaves (Although I really do love the Tchaikovsky concerto as a whole..
Granted both are very difficult and wide open to interpretation. You don't need a Russian sole to play the
Tchaikovsky's cadenza but you must have one ala Berman, Gilels, Gavrilov to make music out of the Rachmaninoff. All in my opinion of course.
Obviously this is a cadenza, for the pianist to show his/her skills. this passage of the concerto has little musical value or meaning, it is just fun and exciting. Stop criticizing his musicality based on this passage. That would like judging someones musicality based on playing a few scales.
Are...you...kidding me. If you're not impressed by this, you know nothing of piano technique. You have no idea what it takes to get to this level, son.
I've been playing classical piano for close to 20 years and octave technique like this is still a pipe dream for me. I've seen a veritable encyclopedia of classical pianists and this is one of the most impressive displays I have ever seen.
Seriously. Lighten up. Those octaves were transcendental.
But come on! We've been talking about how this passage is not about musicality. This isn't the Adagio Cantabile section of Chopin's Fantaisie Impromptu. This is an fff 16th note octave run up the keyboard, and back down again.
I want to see a video of what you consider to be a musical rendition of these octaves. From what I've seen the only differences between this passage among professional pianists is the speed and volume. Neither of which influence the musicality (for me anyway).
i completely agree with you on the fail to impress issue but I think that it may be easier than you think. I can't do it, I'm only 16, but I'm sure in a year or 2 a will be able. Just slow practice. come on, Octaves are not the end of the world
I admire your confidence man. For me the difficulty lies in both the length and speed of the passage. My wrists get very tired by the time it's time to go back up the keyboard in eighth notes and there's a lot of white key to white key octaves which is very difficult to pull off accurately at that speed.
More power to you though! I hope to see your vid up on here one day..
to play octaves at this speed takes alot of talent. People can practice for years and never play them this fast. it is a reflex that only a few have, such as Martha Argerich, and this man.
@vladimirhorowitz Absolutely. I'd sell my mother to have octaves like that. I'm not sure it really serves the music to play them THAT fast, but maybe I'm just envious & I say that to console myself! Either way, WOW!
I was at this concert. The directos was Gustavo Dudamel. It was fenomenal!!! After the Thailkovsky they played the Mahler 2nd Sinphony.... One of my favorites concerts ever! from Venezuela...
It's a bad passage, even judged purely as a display of technique. Each octave blurs into the next, resulting in an unstable sound. With Argerich and Horowitz there is still a palpable sense of rhythm, which is missing here.
I love Argerich.... but I think Sergio did as well as Martha in this case. His octaves were perfect in my opinion... I'm not sure why you said "It's a bad passage, even judged purely as a display of technique." I can understand that you may like other interpretations... but man... playing octaves like this, live, it is something that I have only seen a very FEW other pianist do. Just for not missing a single note he deserve an A+++++.
It's not about playing ottavas "like this". It's about making music. For, playing ottavas, 5 solid stars. For making music in this passage, I'd give him one star. And that's being generous.
Well, I agree to some extent, in my opinion music is both: musicality and technique (just like tennis is power and intelligence). You cannot be good unless you have both qualities. However, I guess you think that both qualities must be present at all times during the entire concerto; and it is there where I think you are wrong. Based on this short passage, you cannot judge how much music ANYBODY can make. This passage is meant to show technique and power. There are other passages where we
absolutely. absolutely. people need to stop over analyzing and being so critical. this passage IS meant to show off, and if he can, he absolutely should.
could talk about musicality, but not here. And even if you want to talk about it, this guy would never be a 1* guy...please. I don't think guy is the best musician other there, but he is definetely not a 1* pianist. This is just amazing and deserves 5* for what it is: power, precision, and technique. I would give this guy a 3.5* or 4* for the music he makes based on OTHER recordings I have listened to, but not this one because I cannot honestly judge that quality in this particular passage.
hey hey, don't get me wrong. I have listened to a lot of Sergio Tiempo. I think his technique is clean (very clean) and his musicality is there when we wants it. Have you heard him with Maisky? He's great and very collaborative and musical. Here he chose to show off and that's all it is - a set of ottaves.
No, I have not listened to him playing with Maisky, but thanks for the recommendation. I will see if I can find it here in youtube. Take care man y saludos a todos los Venezolanos!
@GeorgeMaxwellDuPre It's cool for you to voice your opinion, but you could do it a little less publicly. The musician is amazing and has a blessed talent for the piano
@GeorgeMaxwellDuPre It's cool for you to voice your opinion, but you could do it a little less publicly. The musician is amazing and has a blessed talent for the piano
his fingers are so faking fast that the camera can't catch up with it at the end. I wonder what he'd be like had he done something else. Say,,,boxing..?
I don't think that there is any meaning to cut this passage form the whole piece out. What can we measure on this? The seconds, speed of hands? Than should we say the pianist who play faster the better one? I don't think so.
It is only one aspect of piano playing, you are correct. However, for those who are interested in bravura playing as a end in itself, this is great stuff.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
My comment it's about not only this video, but also about other Tiempo's performances i've seen. Regarding this video: great octave passge, yes, but for me a copy of Argerich once again.
Im not sure if I believe that he plays like argerich. He does seem to imitate her penchant for speed, but in terms of nuance, sound production, and personality? I'm not quite sure if the two pianists are comparable, even if she is his teacher.
Some like it slow, some like it fast. Thank God we have more than one pianist to choose from. I personally like it fast. Who knows, maybe I will change my mind in an hour.
this is a very good interpretation,idiots,what are you talking about??listen the interpretation of 2005 for me is the best never played.All critics serve only to critics.
It's difficult to hear, but poor Sergio hits a couple of wrong notes in his octaves. Serves him right for totally blowing off the climax of the whole concerto. He ruined one of the best passages in the piano literature just to impress people who don't know any better. His study on chopin's etudes are still pretty cool though.
good octaves, but what's the point? where's the music? this octaves encloses a purpose, what is not just a circus show... tempo, be yourself and not another copy of argerich.... she is a legend because knew how be original...
what are you talking about? this is one of the best interpretations of the concert, it has the perfect notes measures, and uses the pedal just the way its supossed when he hits the 8va part everybody criticises tiempo but if you really dont believe in a universal interpretation of a piece then you will learn to apreciate other points of views and others conceptions of a piece he must be really quick learning everything and likes Liszt you must like something with more melody like aranjuez
Yea! He will! No, he will be bigger than Liszt! Whatever if Liszt is the best pianist ever and wrote the harder version of his transcendental etudes when he was 15. They say he even played chopins first etude in octaves, but whatever! Tiempo will easily be that good.
Seriously, you ppl exaggerate everything. He is good, but not Godlike, only because he can play fast octaves.
BTW everybody, this is a clip from his interview on some french show. i'd rather see the whole performance, but i can't deny this clip is fucking awesome! i looked online for DVD performances... not too much out there.
sergio is an amazing pianist and i love his illustrative playing, but let's not forget that tchaikovsky wrote the song. this part was meant to be played fast.. if i'm not mistaken, the octaves were meant to be played as a cadenza. (I dunno what's with all the bad comments..?)
Effettivamente Tiempo sembra sempre voler mettere in mostra la sua tecnica, il che colpisce forse più la vista che l'udito, ma questa è musica e il suono dovrebbe essere tutto...
Chi gli ha dato dell'effeminato? Chi ha detto che non è un musicista? Ho fatto un commento e anche costruttivo dire. Una grande tecnica è strumentale al suono, non è fine a se stessa...
Dell`effeminato gli hanno dato in molti "Link". Non ho detto finocchio, soltanto sembra. Piú di altro sembra il figlio di mama....... grande tecnica ? Si e anche no perché como fatto meccanico va bene, ma no ha nessun controlo di frasseggio fino e altre cose simile. Questo lo puoi vedere en il link dove suona il 2do tempo del terzo concerto di Beethoven. Piú movimenti ceh quel che suona, e sembra chiaro che lui non sa cosa stá facendo. Non e un musicista nel senso de la parola.
Very ugly and uinneccesary speed ..to say what? ..i can play faster than you all?.
This talented but effeminate and few brain pianist, has to try to do thngs alone and not to try to co`y his teacher Martha Argerich who despite the great pianist she is, also is sometimes an histerycal woman who make a lot of nonsense when is in a bad mode. Like the video rehearsal when she play the same octaves so fast without any reason more than : "I like it".
Oye "wilscon" hijo de puta. Yo abro la boca cuando me da la gana y respondo por frateramdeus que el y ytpiano7 finalmente fueron bloquedaos porlos verdaderos que tenían esa identidad. Bajo ese seudónimo hemos escrito hasta 5 personas algunas vez. Yo soy una de ellas y frateramdeus (el no verdadero) está de gira y por eso en su lugar te mando a la mierda. Que no se nada de piano? pobre infeliz que no tienes idea con quien estas tratando. Además......aprende redacción so cagado ------>
------------> Comentario negativo no significa estar en desacuerdo con lo que alguien toca. ¿Entendiste? Comentario negativo es cuando no se dice la verdad perjudicando a otro. Yo digo la verdad que obviamente te cuesta mucho esfuerzo entenderla por tu ignorancia so mediocre, adorador de carroña. Tu "Idolito" el mariconcito Tiempo tiene mucho talento, muchos dedos, poco cerebro y mucho amaneramiento. Anda a usar Scheriproct.
look asshole martha is an artist, she is supersensitive and the reason is because she is ...................A SENSITIVE ARTIST YOU ARE NOTHING STUPID BOY
Perhaps Tchaikosvky intended this to be the most profound moment of the concerto? There are merely exciting ways of playing this passage and boring ways. There is no profoundly musical way.
There's such a thing as playing this TOO fast. Argerich is sometimes guilty of an overly speedy, and less musical technique. I guess I'm one the few who don't care much for her.
His playing is diabolic (listen to his scarbo, wow!). Very musical and artistic. He studied with Alexander Rabinovitch who's a great genius. So lucky this guy!
it is inevitable that you copy a lot from your teacher as this is the person who tells you how to play! as he is taught by martha argerich it is not that surprising!
Wow, so many negative comments based on 22 seconds of footage. Musicians have a nasty habit of making hasty judgments and being only able to see what already supports their view - we can be more rational and responsible than that.
Mr. Tiempo's technique is no doubt superb, but musicianship is not about that. He is so concerned with outspeeding everybody else, but it comes across as exactly that, as concern with spectacular muscular dexterity as oposed to say for instance Ms. Argerich, who gives us a sense of impeding danger and the inevitability of such tempos. Mr. Tiempo lacks the ability to convey such emotions because he is merely concerned with being in awe of his own technical prowess. Absolutely boring.
He's the soloist - It's the cadenza - he can jolly well do what he likes - it's his moment! That is what a cadenza is for!! I disagree with anyone who says his technique isnt good..his ocatves are perfectly fine! and the way he plays this really makes the heart race right at the climax... I'd pay to hear it! so would thousands of other professional musicians..leave him alone!
There is a great paradox in piano playing: if you play superb technically (Argerich, Tiempo, Lang, Berezovsky), you are a robot. If you play very expressive, you "probably" lack of techinical means...
berezovksy is the exception to your rule, hes is phenominal technically, but has a brillaitn interpretation as well, he did win the tchaikovsky competition in 1990, so i reckon the judges are probably right.
It's truly really fast, but it's just more impressive because we see his hands. There's a lot (well, still relative) of pianists who are playing this at this speed
Juste une petite rectification:
j'aime "aussi" le jazz car la technique n'est pas aussi exigeante!!!
Et pourtant,il faut écouter T.MONK ,voir ce qu'il arrive à faire avec une technique limitée(mais : quelle oreille!!!) ou par contre écouter ART TATUM ou OSCAR PETERSON et se rendre compte que les jazzmen ne sont pas non plus des manchots!!!
jeanlucchapelon 2 months ago
I notice more and more people get impressed by such technique...I really do not give a damn, I look for interpretation and maturity. Being impressed by te speed of a pianist is annoying me, I get lost. I don't remember which virtusose learned octaves to his ingeneer neighbourg and the guy did in 2 weeks what he never succeeded to reach in a lifetime...thank God, piano is more than hitting the right notes as quickly as possible. Pianists become stars by increasing tempos nowadays...
KamalKablan 2 months ago
Впечатляет!
yuli4kaver 3 months ago
O_o
MegaPetrof 3 months ago
Wow.... just... wow.
Sinclairelim 3 months ago
INCREDIBILE PIU0 VELOCE DELL ARGERICH ANCHE SE DI POCO..PENSAVO CHE LA PIU' VELOCE FOSSE DI HUNG JUNG LIM INVECE E' DI TIEMPO E ARGERICH
giuseppe76761 7 months ago
I had the good fortune of meeting him about 20 years ago in Miami in a party after the recital. (It didn't cost me a penny). Before the meal, we went up to him and shook his hands and chatted. Already, we were wowed by his amazing technique. All I can remember was when we shook hands, I felt as I had shaken hands with SOLID STEEL. I don't think I will ever forget that.
cubanbach 7 months ago
@cubanbach I shook his hand yesterday! :o
theronniedinhoshow 7 months ago
@theronniedinhoshow So tell me! How was it? :)
cubanbach 7 months ago
speed hack
cheater...
Botchlae 9 months ago 4
This cadenza isn't meant to be musical. It's not developmental, it's not melodic, it's not pretty or ugly; it's got nothing whatever to do with the material which surrounds it. It's just an explosion out of nowhere and out of context, and that's the point: it's pure fire for the sake of showing off and that's it. And damn if it isn't fabulously effective.
tyrelroo 10 months ago 4
@tyrelroo yes.
tombennettpiano 9 months ago
Comment removed
tyrelroo 10 months ago
This is pretty amazing. Check him out. He's also GORGEOUS!!!!
trschaefer 10 months ago
RIDICULOUS
wow this guy is AMAZING
derek44344 11 months ago
Awful and weird.
ueblondon 11 months ago
All technique, no music...
georgecziffra 1 year ago
He's certainly fast, and is phenomenal in that sense for sure, but it lacks the musical quality. Argerich is equally fast, but she still (somehow) manages to make it musical...
mmoynan 1 year ago
That must hurt so badly
Japanzor 1 year ago
martha's still better though
yohbyo 1 year ago
haha Martha Argerich written ALL over him.... he's defniitely being taught well
chutdigadut 1 year ago
i got a musical BONER
hohohee1 1 year ago 2
just as fantastic as Volodya yet even faster and cleaner!!
24link135 1 year ago
Where can I find the entire movment of the Concerto?
modelstatue 1 year ago
WOW!
OrangeSodaKing 1 year ago
Impressionnant : pas seulement la vitesse, mais aussi l'électricité :!
pianotonton 1 year ago
He is A mosterr!!
claudialanfranchi 1 year ago
not impressed at all, only technique, say's nothing. Only showing of with his octaves
mombeekmarcel 1 year ago
@mombeekmarcel Listen to the whole concerto, and it will put this in context.
OrangeSodaKing 1 year ago
not impressed at all, only technique, say's nothing. Only showing of with his octaves
mombeekmarcel 1 year ago
I got crazy.
pashmake07 1 year ago
wouauuuuuuuuuuuuu,,,,eheh:-)
Ellinidara 1 year ago
theyre fast and impressive, but that hand position could ruin his hands
Prepared2Die 1 year ago 6
che polsi alti...
GRANDE
4785689 1 year ago
es un gran pianista, algunos podrian criticar su cierta falta de sensibilidad, pero aun asi, sus aptitudes y capacidades, son tan grandes que ya es capaz de cambiar de mil maneras sus interpretaciones. Existen muy buenas grabaciones con el.
Nimenicamine01 1 year ago
Whoa!
Listen to the cadenzas of Rach. #3. These are music thus have musicality. The Tchaikovsky by comparison in my view has far less "music" and is just banging octaves (Although I really do love the Tchaikovsky concerto as a whole..
Granted both are very difficult and wide open to interpretation. You don't need a Russian sole to play the
Tchaikovsky's cadenza but you must have one ala Berman, Gilels, Gavrilov to make music out of the Rachmaninoff. All in my opinion of course.
mrjlowitz 1 year ago
*makes me want to chuck my piano out the wondow :/*
pianomangabe 2 years ago
Obviously this is a cadenza, for the pianist to show his/her skills. this passage of the concerto has little musical value or meaning, it is just fun and exciting. Stop criticizing his musicality based on this passage. That would like judging someones musicality based on playing a few scales.
davidbaker03 2 years ago 7
@davidbaker03 yes.
tombennettpiano 9 months ago
most of the people here who have to say something about the performance will never play the happy birthday in a Casio keyboard...
:P
cascarudo71 2 years ago 6
First, let me say that you're not sure about that. Secondly, let me say that this was just for flash and dash and fails to impress as a result.
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 2 years ago
@GeorgeMaxwellDuPre "fails to impress"
Are...you...kidding me. If you're not impressed by this, you know nothing of piano technique. You have no idea what it takes to get to this level, son.
I've been playing classical piano for close to 20 years and octave technique like this is still a pipe dream for me. I've seen a veritable encyclopedia of classical pianists and this is one of the most impressive displays I have ever seen.
Seriously. Lighten up. Those octaves were transcendental.
vladimirhorowitz 2 years ago 40
The octaves are phenomenal! The music here is not.
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 2 years ago 3
But come on! We've been talking about how this passage is not about musicality. This isn't the Adagio Cantabile section of Chopin's Fantaisie Impromptu. This is an fff 16th note octave run up the keyboard, and back down again.
I want to see a video of what you consider to be a musical rendition of these octaves. From what I've seen the only differences between this passage among professional pianists is the speed and volume. Neither of which influence the musicality (for me anyway).
vladimirhorowitz 2 years ago 5
And "phenomenal" is generally not a word one uses to describe something that "fails to impress" them. =P
vladimirhorowitz 2 years ago
It is impressive from a particular standpoint. I'll look for a reading that is musically impressive to send to you. hahah
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 2 years ago
@GeorgeMaxwellDuPre
I totally agree!!
zander09401 2 years ago
Jesus Christ. Someone criticized this?
Someone needs to get a life.
FredilYupigo 2 years ago 11
AMEN! sick of jealous haters who think they are true musicians.
davidbaker03 1 year ago 4
i completely agree with you on the fail to impress issue but I think that it may be easier than you think. I can't do it, I'm only 16, but I'm sure in a year or 2 a will be able. Just slow practice. come on, Octaves are not the end of the world
kevinjamespiano 2 years ago
I admire your confidence man. For me the difficulty lies in both the length and speed of the passage. My wrists get very tired by the time it's time to go back up the keyboard in eighth notes and there's a lot of white key to white key octaves which is very difficult to pull off accurately at that speed.
More power to you though! I hope to see your vid up on here one day..
vladimirhorowitz 2 years ago
to play octaves at this speed takes alot of talent. People can practice for years and never play them this fast. it is a reflex that only a few have, such as Martha Argerich, and this man.
davidbaker03 1 year ago
I think personally Alexei Grynyuk's HR6 is faster in the octave unleash part, but I do agree that this level is amazing by itself already.
mrkwonsony 1 year ago
@vladimirhorowitz Absolutely. I'd sell my mother to have octaves like that. I'm not sure it really serves the music to play them THAT fast, but maybe I'm just envious & I say that to console myself! Either way, WOW!
assindiastignani 1 month ago
omg was my first impresion haha
64wulf 2 years ago
I was at this concert. The directos was Gustavo Dudamel. It was fenomenal!!! After the Thailkovsky they played the Mahler 2nd Sinphony.... One of my favorites concerts ever! from Venezuela...
Alberto
albertohh07 2 years ago
The teacher has been dethroned!
Liebromeistal 2 years ago 3
It's a bad passage, even judged purely as a display of technique. Each octave blurs into the next, resulting in an unstable sound. With Argerich and Horowitz there is still a palpable sense of rhythm, which is missing here.
demosj 2 years ago
I love Argerich.... but I think Sergio did as well as Martha in this case. His octaves were perfect in my opinion... I'm not sure why you said "It's a bad passage, even judged purely as a display of technique." I can understand that you may like other interpretations... but man... playing octaves like this, live, it is something that I have only seen a very FEW other pianist do. Just for not missing a single note he deserve an A+++++.
KalymotxoII 2 years ago 3
It's not about playing ottavas "like this". It's about making music. For, playing ottavas, 5 solid stars. For making music in this passage, I'd give him one star. And that's being generous.
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 2 years ago
Well, I agree to some extent, in my opinion music is both: musicality and technique (just like tennis is power and intelligence). You cannot be good unless you have both qualities. However, I guess you think that both qualities must be present at all times during the entire concerto; and it is there where I think you are wrong. Based on this short passage, you cannot judge how much music ANYBODY can make. This passage is meant to show technique and power. There are other passages where we
KalymotxoII 2 years ago 3
absolutely. absolutely. people need to stop over analyzing and being so critical. this passage IS meant to show off, and if he can, he absolutely should.
davidbaker03 2 years ago 6
could talk about musicality, but not here. And even if you want to talk about it, this guy would never be a 1* guy...please. I don't think guy is the best musician other there, but he is definetely not a 1* pianist. This is just amazing and deserves 5* for what it is: power, precision, and technique. I would give this guy a 3.5* or 4* for the music he makes based on OTHER recordings I have listened to, but not this one because I cannot honestly judge that quality in this particular passage.
KalymotxoII 2 years ago
hey hey, don't get me wrong. I have listened to a lot of Sergio Tiempo. I think his technique is clean (very clean) and his musicality is there when we wants it. Have you heard him with Maisky? He's great and very collaborative and musical. Here he chose to show off and that's all it is - a set of ottaves.
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 2 years ago
No, I have not listened to him playing with Maisky, but thanks for the recommendation. I will see if I can find it here in youtube. Take care man y saludos a todos los Venezolanos!
KalymotxoII 2 years ago
@KalymotxoII Besides the wrong note.
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 1 year ago
@demosj
Come on! he played it well. (I just didn't like it much. It was too fast, like a blur of sound).
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 1 year ago
@GeorgeMaxwellDuPre It's cool for you to voice your opinion, but you could do it a little less publicly. The musician is amazing and has a blessed talent for the piano
ScarceOTatties 1 year ago
@GeorgeMaxwellDuPre It's cool for you to voice your opinion, but you could do it a little less publicly. The musician is amazing and has a blessed talent for the piano
ScarceOTatties 1 year ago
his fingers are so faking fast that the camera can't catch up with it at the end. I wonder what he'd be like had he done something else. Say,,,boxing..?
cisdolce 2 years ago
I don't think that there is any meaning to cut this passage form the whole piece out. What can we measure on this? The seconds, speed of hands? Than should we say the pianist who play faster the better one? I don't think so.
nblart 2 years ago
It is only one aspect of piano playing, you are correct. However, for those who are interested in bravura playing as a end in itself, this is great stuff.
Frozentoes1 2 years ago 4
nop, but he`s a really grate pianist!
albertohh07 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
My comment it's about not only this video, but also about other Tiempo's performances i've seen. Regarding this video: great octave passge, yes, but for me a copy of Argerich once again.
TheEngraver 2 years ago
Im not sure if I believe that he plays like argerich. He does seem to imitate her penchant for speed, but in terms of nuance, sound production, and personality? I'm not quite sure if the two pianists are comparable, even if she is his teacher.
yogaman13 2 years ago 3
He has such big fingers!
davidgray2 2 years ago
Bah..it seems to me Tiempo is a bad copy of Martha Argerich, every composition he play.
TheEngraver 2 years ago 5
It's not a very fair comment after you watch such a great octave passage by a very competent artist, but ...I must agree. : |
leomulder 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Actually that passage was pretty horrible, seeing there was zero meaning in it and 100% technique showoff.
Tiempo is like an Argerich minus the music plus more ridiculous speed.
trigalg693 2 years ago
I'm not so radical, but ok.
leomulder 2 years ago
Agreed!
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 2 years ago
Lol this is just the climax from the Tchikovski {Yes I don't know how to spell his name...} concerto
Chopianist3 2 years ago
same as argerich...
vrljikkerssfesst 3 years ago 4
I wonder why :)
framaulo 2 years ago
agree
gjwr 2 years ago
who dont mate? :D
fast is always better than slow
elmok
hehehehe
tmaem
cmoll7b9 3 years ago
Some like it slow, some like it fast. Thank God we have more than one pianist to choose from. I personally like it fast. Who knows, maybe I will change my mind in an hour.
elmok81 3 years ago 27
you've got it!
SirArmengol 2 years ago
i want his technique
cisdolce 3 years ago 8
me too!!!!!.....
Elicgt 3 years ago
this is a very good interpretation,idiots,what are you talking about??listen the interpretation of 2005 for me is the best never played.All critics serve only to critics.
foppola 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not music!!!
PianoGirl555 3 years ago
Argerich played this octaves so well.. and look to her student! Can't understand...
peixotoraul 3 years ago
It's difficult to hear, but poor Sergio hits a couple of wrong notes in his octaves. Serves him right for totally blowing off the climax of the whole concerto. He ruined one of the best passages in the piano literature just to impress people who don't know any better. His study on chopin's etudes are still pretty cool though.
musictheory123 3 years ago
this is acrobat or sport,not music.
relaxanimal 3 years ago
good octaves, but what's the point? where's the music? this octaves encloses a purpose, what is not just a circus show... tempo, be yourself and not another copy of argerich.... she is a legend because knew how be original...
PianoVlog 3 years ago 7
what are you talking about? this is one of the best interpretations of the concert, it has the perfect notes measures, and uses the pedal just the way its supossed when he hits the 8va part everybody criticises tiempo but if you really dont believe in a universal interpretation of a piece then you will learn to apreciate other points of views and others conceptions of a piece he must be really quick learning everything and likes Liszt you must like something with more melody like aranjuez
josemariomonzon 3 years ago 2
good use of the 4th finger on the black keys.... and thanx to czerny perhaps? ^_^
vrljikkerssfesst 3 years ago 2
Show off!
GeorgeMaxwellDuPre 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this guy is the next liszt!! i would like 2 c him play a trio with Maksim Markov and Valentina Lisitsa!! OMG!! that would b the ultimate passion!!
bluematrix109 3 years ago
Yea! He will! No, he will be bigger than Liszt! Whatever if Liszt is the best pianist ever and wrote the harder version of his transcendental etudes when he was 15. They say he even played chopins first etude in octaves, but whatever! Tiempo will easily be that good.
Seriously, you ppl exaggerate everything. He is good, but not Godlike, only because he can play fast octaves.
Pianisteny2k 3 years ago 2
Maksim and Lisitsa? haha...
THhere very different types of pianists, especially Sergio.
Lemonizm 3 years ago 2
lol! He should Marry Valentina Lisitsa!! haha!
bluematrix109 3 years ago
Why SHE all of people?
Whom does he marry? By the way I´m convinced that he has a girlfriend, perhaps lots of girlfriends. Look, this man is a glamor boy.
And his playing is incredible!!
AlmaSchiwago 3 years ago
check her out on youtube... she's another awesome pianist... i recommend the rachmaninoff etude.. short, sweet, and to the point.
rachelcheng1 3 years ago
BTW everybody, this is a clip from his interview on some french show. i'd rather see the whole performance, but i can't deny this clip is fucking awesome! i looked online for DVD performances... not too much out there.
sergio is an amazing pianist and i love his illustrative playing, but let's not forget that tchaikovsky wrote the song. this part was meant to be played fast.. if i'm not mistaken, the octaves were meant to be played as a cadenza. (I dunno what's with all the bad comments..?)
rachelcheng1 3 years ago
lol hax
robbiethemann 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
SO ?????
666
z666z666z 3 years ago
Ow ! O_o It's just too fast !
anisweiler 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
MEGA fast.
SO ?????????
666
z666z666z 3 years ago
Effettivamente Tiempo sembra sempre voler mettere in mostra la sua tecnica, il che colpisce forse più la vista che l'udito, ma questa è musica e il suono dovrebbe essere tutto...
phemt666 3 years ago
Ciao phemt666 certo. Questo effeminato non fa altro che suonare presto e forte.
Nos e veramente musicista.
Suona incredibilmente presto ........le ottave a 300 Km .........ma cosa significa quello?
666
z666z666z 3 years ago
Ho fatto un sbaglio.....ho voluto scribere: "NON e veramente musicista"...
666
z666z666z 3 years ago
Chi gli ha dato dell'effeminato? Chi ha detto che non è un musicista? Ho fatto un commento e anche costruttivo dire. Una grande tecnica è strumentale al suono, non è fine a se stessa...
phemt666 3 years ago
Dell`effeminato gli hanno dato in molti "Link". Non ho detto finocchio, soltanto sembra. Piú di altro sembra il figlio di mama....... grande tecnica ? Si e anche no perché como fatto meccanico va bene, ma no ha nessun controlo di frasseggio fino e altre cose simile. Questo lo puoi vedere en il link dove suona il 2do tempo del terzo concerto di Beethoven. Piú movimenti ceh quel che suona, e sembra chiaro che lui non sa cosa stá facendo. Non e un musicista nel senso de la parola.
666
z666z666z 3 years ago
This guy wins the octaves race, that's for sure but musically it is way out of context.
shubus 3 years ago 3
his play resembles martha argerich
chinenyuki 3 years ago
Come on chiyenyuki...........Martha teached him some time ago, but Martha is martha .............
666
z666z666z 3 years ago
SERGIO!!!!I need whole performens of Tchaik. asap!!!!!!!!!!!I need it .
sam0xin 3 years ago
okay, this does not sound really good. Why ?
1° "Tempo I (allegro con fuoco) ma tranquillo, POCO piu mosso".
NOT PRESTISSIMO ! ! !
2° "FF then FF MARTELATO E RITENUTO MOLTO."
vos2k 3 years ago
Very ugly and uinneccesary speed ..to say what? ..i can play faster than you all?.
This talented but effeminate and few brain pianist, has to try to do thngs alone and not to try to co`y his teacher Martha Argerich who despite the great pianist she is, also is sometimes an histerycal woman who make a lot of nonsense when is in a bad mode. Like the video rehearsal when she play the same octaves so fast without any reason more than : "I like it".
frateramadeus
frateramadeus 3 years ago
siempre tienes algun comentario negativo. ¿Por qué no cierras la boca un rato? Es obvio que no puedes tocar el piano y que no sabes nade de musica.
wilsocn 3 years ago
Oye "wilscon" hijo de puta. Yo abro la boca cuando me da la gana y respondo por frateramdeus que el y ytpiano7 finalmente fueron bloquedaos porlos verdaderos que tenían esa identidad. Bajo ese seudónimo hemos escrito hasta 5 personas algunas vez. Yo soy una de ellas y frateramdeus (el no verdadero) está de gira y por eso en su lugar te mando a la mierda. Que no se nada de piano? pobre infeliz que no tienes idea con quien estas tratando. Además......aprende redacción so cagado ------>
z666z666z 3 years ago
------------> Comentario negativo no significa estar en desacuerdo con lo que alguien toca. ¿Entendiste? Comentario negativo es cuando no se dice la verdad perjudicando a otro. Yo digo la verdad que obviamente te cuesta mucho esfuerzo entenderla por tu ignorancia so mediocre, adorador de carroña. Tu "Idolito" el mariconcito Tiempo tiene mucho talento, muchos dedos, poco cerebro y mucho amaneramiento. Anda a usar Scheriproct.
666
z666z666z 3 years ago
look asshole martha is an artist, she is supersensitive and the reason is because she is ...................A SENSITIVE ARTIST YOU ARE NOTHING STUPID BOY
jesemus33 3 years ago 3
Wow, that's a huge fucking orchestra.
FuocoID 3 years ago
Boy, i love your sense of humour!! I am still laughing
amcmjel 3 years ago
lol if this is huge don't watch karajan and Beethoven's 9th symphony T_T
misotoma 3 years ago
Great speed, fun to watch, fast as his teacher Martha (not as clear and powerful), but certainly not musical.
Few pianists play these octaves in a musical way (i.e.Pogorelich)
voolare 3 years ago 2
Perhaps Tchaikosvky intended this to be the most profound moment of the concerto? There are merely exciting ways of playing this passage and boring ways. There is no profoundly musical way.
cziffra1980 3 years ago
I don't like :s...in my opinion technically is perfect, but this type of music is not so fast and hard, it may sound more nice
Rickyr389 3 years ago 2
It's not absolutely "perfect" :in fact he misses one "G-F" (0'11 ; he plays A)
But it's so fast...
Emlomor 3 years ago
Haha... finally this "Rickyr389" make an intelligent comment. Well sometimes never is too late.
frateramadeus
frateramadeus 3 years ago
Quelle force et technique. Extraordinaire.
9461305 3 years ago
Still not as good as the incomparable Martha Argerich
JasonERAU 3 years ago 2
There's such a thing as playing this TOO fast. Argerich is sometimes guilty of an overly speedy, and less musical technique. I guess I'm one the few who don't care much for her.
kjw163 3 years ago
sorry its tcahiowksyk but its not normal speed its 2x speed
1905gsgs 3 years ago
Simply for the sake of seeing people's responses. You're still here to, so I'd say were both up to the same thing. We just have diffrent stands.
jecian1978 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it isn tchaiowsky it is chopins concerto no 2
1905gsgs 4 years ago
You are wrong. It's Tchaikovsky's piano concerto no. 1
0OoFACUoO0 4 years ago
hahahah, oh that's too good...
HaparukuU 3 years ago
"Are there any differences between sergio tiempo and martha argerich? "
This phrase is wrong,I think.
He has talent different from his teacher.
When he was a child,he was good piano player.
werqf 4 years ago
His playing is diabolic (listen to his scarbo, wow!). Very musical and artistic. He studied with Alexander Rabinovitch who's a great genius. So lucky this guy!
arthurcrescendo 4 years ago
Eat shit katsaris!!!!!!!!
jecian1978 4 years ago
well jecian i m glad you re still out there trying to find someone better than him.The only question is why?
Tacitus87 3 years ago
彼の先生のマルタ・アルゲリッチと比べるのはよくないと思うんですけどねえ
werqf 4 years ago
it is inevitable that you copy a lot from your teacher as this is the person who tells you how to play! as he is taught by martha argerich it is not that surprising!
mephisto66773 4 years ago
wow.
jannokas85 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hes Far better than Martha u fool
konzolmester 4 years ago
Is he trying to copy Martha Argerich??
jero13595 4 years ago
Or maybe Horowitz ?
rigel48 4 years ago
oh yeah he made this minor mistake at 0:11, just 10 more of those in each of his performances and he'd definitely be copying horowitz!
fionasapple 4 years ago
Well he was taught by Martha
squirrel221 4 years ago
Wow, so many negative comments based on 22 seconds of footage. Musicians have a nasty habit of making hasty judgments and being only able to see what already supports their view - we can be more rational and responsible than that.
percusxn 4 years ago
You're so right!:-)
JJKjaer 4 years ago
Mr. Tiempo's technique is no doubt superb, but musicianship is not about that. He is so concerned with outspeeding everybody else, but it comes across as exactly that, as concern with spectacular muscular dexterity as oposed to say for instance Ms. Argerich, who gives us a sense of impeding danger and the inevitability of such tempos. Mr. Tiempo lacks the ability to convey such emotions because he is merely concerned with being in awe of his own technical prowess. Absolutely boring.
lobo48ar 4 years ago
That speed owns me.
RumunskiePorzekadlo 4 years ago
He's the soloist - It's the cadenza - he can jolly well do what he likes - it's his moment! That is what a cadenza is for!! I disagree with anyone who says his technique isnt good..his ocatves are perfectly fine! and the way he plays this really makes the heart race right at the climax... I'd pay to hear it! so would thousands of other professional musicians..leave him alone!
pianoboyo 4 years ago 2
well said!!!
lipattihaskill 4 years ago
There is a great paradox in piano playing: if you play superb technically (Argerich, Tiempo, Lang, Berezovsky), you are a robot. If you play very expressive, you "probably" lack of techinical means...
liszt80 4 years ago 3
berezovksy is the exception to your rule, hes is phenominal technically, but has a brillaitn interpretation as well, he did win the tchaikovsky competition in 1990, so i reckon the judges are probably right.
ljoekelsoey4 4 years ago
Horowitz, Cziffra, Richter?
HaparukuU 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
another proof: tiempo is NOT a musician and probably will never be one...
marcelmombeekeigen 4 years ago
WOW!!! (...) But he's an idiot exhibitionist playing this part this fast!!
MihDiV 4 years ago
................................
sapetoku67 4 years ago
fukkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
ihrtmusic12334 4 years ago
watch?v=MALX7cVpuKU
me testing out octaves for FUN.
rachmaninovian92 4 years ago
Argerich Owns those octaves :D
ieronim2003 4 years ago 2
:DDDDD
MihDiV 4 years ago
dammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
klin666 4 years ago
fingersticks
hr2 4 years ago
i am amazed and disgusted at the same time.
jefftam1234 4 years ago
It's truly really fast, but it's just more impressive because we see his hands. There's a lot (well, still relative) of pianists who are playing this at this speed
cesarcui 4 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FUCKKKKKKKKKKKKKK!!!!!!!
tru da TEMPO endurance weaknezz a bit vizible in da end but DAIM, da raw wank zkillz iz TRU!!!!!
datruzepp 4 years ago