Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
The other comments are amusing.
The 1st comment is shallow. No matter who won a debate, it isn't the same thing as being right. To win debates is to be a persuasive speaker/rhetorician. Being a scholar is a different ability. There are many horrific political & religious leaders who are great debaters.
Anyway here is an article of Wolfe analyzing D'Souza:
w ww. nytimes. com/2007/01/21/books/review/Wolfe. t. html
The 2nd comment misses the point. Wolfe argues against wingnuts on the left & right.
MarmaladeINFP 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
checkout my page for real christian talk podcast style. straight shooting about the truth. we want to destroy the hypocrisy, misunderstanding, self-righteous views. please help us. tryin to spark the youth and the Army of God that will rise up during these times. thanks guys peace and love!
TruthBeTold827 7 months ago
Wolfe is a wingnut. Hes a nobody who tries to get attention by trying to criticize famous economist. I think he just hopes they will reply and he will get some publicity. But like Richard Dawkins once said regarding moron that "debating them does nothing for me, but fo them it legitimizes them". Wolfe is the same way on economic issues. He tries to criticize famous economist just to get some publicity.
shaqdaddy11 1 year ago
alan wolfe is an ignoramus he got slaughtered in a debate with dinesh dsouza
eugdog106 2 years ago