Added: 4 years ago
From: tenz0r99
Views: 5,926
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (44)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol aim

  • 15-20 FPS (because of FRAPS), in a game I had only played for about 2 hours at that time, "lol" all you want.

  • E6300 1800mhz oc 2450mhz

    4gb ddr2800

    Geforce 8800 gts 640mb oc 632/1624/1896

    samsung 2x1TB Hard Drive

    x-fi fatality sound card

    Crysis in winxp using mod off gamecopy world. I've got everything on very high except shaders, which is on high at a res of 1280x1024 x2aa and get 23 min fps.

    25fps withh aa off. It's reasonably smooth most of the time. Anyone know how much better a gtx 9800+/250 is at the same res, as I'm thinking of getting one. What fps with the same settings do you get?

  • You are using quad core 6600 and a higher video card 8800 gts with 640 mb, what a waste of money? Well actually we have the same performance and graphic quality on 1024x768 with my old obsolete pc( ATLON 3000+, 512 mb 8600 gt vcard, and a 5 year warranty 500 gig hard disk. 2 gig is my memory. Do you want proof?

  • You're dumb.

  • wht monitor did u had when u made this cideo

  • I had a 19" viewsonic.

  • Maybe i will get Q6600 Soon and i have 8800 GTS game will run Smooth?

  • no need, i actually try this game on all high settings at 1024x768 (no lags no delays but with great graphics and game experience) with a settings as low at atlon 3000+ with 8600 gt , 2 gig system ram and a 500 gig hdisk, okey? Even thought this is an obsolete pc but runs just what you see on the clip. Do you want evidence? The pc is in my garage, but I still play on all high settings.

  • you have a q6600 and a 8800 GTS 640 MB and you play the game at 1024x768 rezolution=)).Try 1280x1024 or 1440x900 lol:) copy and paste

  • That was back when Crysis hadn't released any patches to increase FPS, also when NVIDIA drivers ran like crap on Crysis. I currently have a GTX 260 and a 22" monitor with a resolution of 1680x1050, running on max settings @ 1680x1050 w/ playable FPS, no problem.

  • ok your pc is great

  • I do agree on that, but what i try is only 1064x768, this is what my old monitor can support, it runs great just like the clip above with my obsolete pc specs (atlon 3000+, 4 pc400 512 mb system ram, 8600 gt 512 mb vram and a 500 gig hard disk. A price that is just only little.

  • @druidkg lol i have the same setup and i run on all high at 1920x1080. not sure whats up with your guys comps.

  • you have a q6600 and a 8800 GTS 640 MB and you play the game at 1024x768 rezolution=)).Try 1280x1024 or 1440x900 lol:)

  • Maybe he doesn't need it when he has a small monitor ^^

  • Running crysis @ 1680x1050 with GTX 260 :P

  • i have a

    q6600 @ 2.7

    xfx 8800gt @ stock

    4 gb ram ( 2 * 2 800 mhz )KINGSTON

    asus p5n e sli, 650i chipset

    and a 550 TT modular psu..

    do you recomend me to change mi gt to a 4850?

    would i see a big jump in performance?

    plz reply its important

  • Would you see a decent increase in performance? Yes. Do I personally believe going from an 8800 GT to a HD 4850 is worth it? Not overly. You'll definitely see higher a FPS, but it will vary from game to game. If you are going to get a new video card, at least look at something like an overclocked GTX 260 or an HD 4870. Stock clocked GTX 260's for $220 after rebates, and you can get extremely overclocked GTX 260's for ~$270 after rebates. Diamond has an overclocked HD 4870 for $260 after rebates.

  • thx 4 replyng..

    i live in uruguay.. and the 4870 costs 450 bucks.. and te 4850 274 $

    So im selling my gt at 220 amn pay the rest 4 the 4850..

    so i should wait or what? i want more fps :D

  • I personally think you should wait to either get more money to pay for a better video card, or just wait for the prices to go down in general. I've come to see that Europe and South America and basically the rest of the world in general have higher prices on hardware compared to the USA and seem to be a few months behind in price cuts. I know how you feel wanting more FPS, seeing how I've been though 4 video cards in 2 years. I went from an FX 5600 Ultra, to 7600 GT, to an 8800 GTS to a GTX 260.

  • hmm, you have a lot of money, me from a damage 6600, i buy a new 8600 gt and put on a msi mboard with a atlon 3000+ and a 2 gig system pc400 ram runs great on crysis (all high settings) at 1024x768 (my old monitor can only support this one)

  • hey, i might be buying a new comp. and can u tell me where to buy a Q6600, are there any at best buy? thnx :)

  • lmao. Reading that comment made me laugh...

    coolmanjasdeep congradulations. You are a real noob....

  • nerd...

  • Screw You!

  • damn, I got a 8800 GT with Q6600 and 4 Gigs of RAM it runs.. like 25 - 30 FPS average urgh...

  • how will i do at 1280x1024 on high?

    quad core q6600

    diamond 4850

    2 gig 800 ram

    xp pro?

  • Well, NVIDIA cards generally do better on Crysis compared to all the ATI cards, but the HD 4850 does better on Crysis than my 8800 GTS did (I had a GTX 260 now). Also, I was running on older drivers and Crysis v1.1 back when I made this, so with v1.2 and new drivers, I probably could of ran on 1280x1024 fine with my 8800 GTS. With updated catalyst drivers, and the v1.2 update for Crysis, an HD 4850 should be more than enough.

  • is this better than 8800gts, though 8800gts 640mb seems to have less SP?

  • It depends on which 8800 GTS we are talking about. There are 3 different models, 2 use the G80 core and one uses the G92. The G92 is a shrunken down G80 with higher clocks, but the G80 on the 8800 GTS's have some of the shaders laser cut from them. The GTS with the G92 is the 512mb model, in which case no, the 8800 GTS 640mb (G80) is NOT faster than the 8800 GTS 512mb (G92). I don't use the 8800 GTS anymore however, I got a GTX 260 now.

  • well i was comparing 8800gts 640mb to 8800gt 512mb.

  • Nice vid I got a AMD with a ATI 3870 and runs pretty nice.  Got vids checkem out if you want.

  • vista sux for gaming. vista is just a system hog and slows the frame rate tremendously

  • not on new games. there it's better with vista

  • divx 10 can only run on vista

  • r u idot? did you mean:

    xp sux for gaming. xp is just a system hog and haves a fucking gaming core

  • Very nice.That runs pretty well on that system.I'd like to see how it runs on very high.

  • I'm getting the Q9450 next week then I'm going to sell my Q6600 on eBay :D

  • I can run very high settings but I get about 22 FPS average but on high settings I get 28-30 FPS average in the Crysis benchmark. Very smooth for me too.

  • On 1280x1024 i can now get it to 35-45 fps sometimes peeking at 60 with all settings high except shaders at medium, 0xaa. Shaders reduce the most fps

  • I might try and run this game on very high settings with my setup.

    Q6600 @ 3.2GHz

    4GB DDR2 800

    8800 GTS 640MB (overclocked myself, 650 - core, 1514 - shader, 947 - memory.

    Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit

    1200W PSU

    250GB HDD SATA II

  • Nope u cant run Crysis on very high!

    My rig is :

    Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 @ 3GHz (maybe upgrate to E8400-8500)

    2GB DDR2 800MHz

    XFX 8800GT 512MB Alpha Dog Edition

    Windows Vista 64 Ultimate

    I can run all high 1440x900 and its realy smooth :)

  • you can run Mster config with quality, it looks the same as very high

  • I might try and run this game on very high settings with my setup.

    Q6600 @ 3.2GHz

    4GB DDR2 800

    8800 GTS 640MB (overclocked myself, 650 - core, 1514 - shader, 947 - memory.

    Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit

    1200W PSU

    250GB HDD SATA II

  • some issues with aiming...huh? ;-) anyway... nice video tough. shows what can do a q6600 and 8800. nice

  • Yeah, it's kind of hard to aim and jump when it's recording at 20-25 FPS. Normally I get an average of 40 FPS but FRAPS really lags things up.

  • Dude i have the same rig as you do you find that if you turn aa on you lose to much fps?

  • Depends on what game. The only games that I get low FPS on with AA on is Crysis and UT3. I can run every other game with good FPS with 2x and 4x AA, and some games even more.

  • seriously, i turn on 4x AA and crysis slows WAY down. nice video, AMAZING framerate.

  • i think there is somethin wrong/weird going on in my comp. it doesnt matter what resolution i have, its still the same fps, i did a test and it doesnt change with AA either, so now im at 1024x768 res. and 4x AA, and it looks better than 1280x1024, and i noticed that when u lower your resoltion, the framerates get more stable (less lags).

    btw im running on AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+, XFX 8800GT Alpha Dog Edition Standard and 1.5 GB RAM. Also Paradise Lost runs almost better than the others levels.

  • processor bottleneck, everything caps off at your max CPU potential, so overclock, or get a new CPU/mobo. 1.5 GB of ram is fine for crysis at high settings.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more